DOCSLIB.ORG

PRELIMS MEDIEVAL HISTORY.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CHAPTER THE DELHI SULTANATE 3.1 (1206-1526 AD) Introduction After Muhammad Ghori’s death, his nephew Ghiyasuddin Mahmud became the ruler of Ghur, but he was in constant fear of internal revolts and foreign invasions. Tajuddin Yalduz, Nasiruddin Qubacha and Qutbud-din Aibak - the three able and trusted Turkish nobles of Muhammad Ghuri each one of them aspired for independence. Ghiyasuddin Mahmud could not suppress their revolts and hence immediately after the death of Muhammad Ghuri, partition of his empire started. Yalduz succeeded at Ghazni and as the ruler of Ghazni wished to bring India also under his suzerainty. Qubacha who had held Multan and Uchh since 1205, occupied the whole of Sind and decided to declare his independence. The Indian possession was held by Qutbud-din-Aibak. The establishment of Delhi Sultanate which existed from A.D. 1206 to 1526 had fi ve different dynasties - the Slave (Mamluk Sultans), Khilji, Tughlaq, Sayyids and Lodis. Not only they extended their rule over North India, but they also penetrated into the Deccan and South India. Their rule in India resulted in far-reaching changes in society, administration and cultural life. Slave/Mamluk Dynasty (Ilbari Turks) The dynasty founded by the Ilbari Turks is generally called the ‘Slave Dynasty’ or ‘Mamluk Dynasty’ because many of the important rulers of this dynasty had originally been slaves like Qutbud-din was a slave of Mahmud Ghuri, and Iltutmish was slave of Qutbud-din. Qutbuddin Aibak (1206-1210 AD) Qutbuddin Aibak was a Turkish slave who had risen to high rank in Muhammad Ghori’s army. After Muhammad Ghori’s death in AD 1206, the control of his Indian possessions was passed on to Qutbuddin Aibak. Aibak was the fi rst independent Muslim ruler of Northern India, the founder of Delhi Sultanate. Aibak had to face many revolts from Rajputs and other Indian chiefs. Tajudding Yaldauz, the rule of Ghazni, claimed his rule over Delhi. Aibak defeated Yaldauz and severed all connections with Ghazni. Aibak was able to win over his enemies by conciliatory measures as well as a display of power. 32 The successor of Jaichand, Harishchandra had driven out the Turks from Badayun and Farukhabad. Aibak re-conquered both Badayun and Farukhabad. Qutbuddin Aibak was brave, faithful and generous and due to his generosity he was known as “Lakh Baksh”. Most of the scholars consider Aibak as the real founder of Muslim rule in India. Aibak died in 1210 AD, while playing Chaugan (horse polo). Iltutmish (1210-1236 AD) On Aibak’s death in 1210 AD his adopted son Aram Shah succeeded to the throne but he was shortly after removed by Iltutmish, Qutbud-din’s slave and governor of Budaun. Iltutmish’s elevation was resented by many Turkish nobles while Qubacha, the governor of Sind and Yalduz, the governor of Ghazni rose in open revolt. Yalduz was defeated near Tarain in 1215 AD and Qubacha was fi nally subdued in 1228 AD. Ali Mordan Khan of Bengal and Bihar, who had rebelled, was suppressed. The revolt of Hindu rulers at Gwalior and Ranthambore who had declared their independence was tackled. In Bihar and Bengal, a person called Iwaz had taken the title of Sultan Ghiyasuddin has assumed his independence. In 1226-27, Iwaz was defeated and killed in a battle near Lakhanauti. Mongols under the leadership of Changiz Khan in pursuit of Jalaluddin, a prince of Khwarizm who had fl ed to Punjab and sought asylum in Iltutmish’s court marched towards India. India was in imminent danger of being overrun by the Mongols but Iltutmish’s acting with precedence, refused asylum and saved the infant Turkish empire from the wrath of the Mongol warlord. In 1229 AD, Iltutmish received a role of honour and a patent of investiture from Al Mustansir Bildah, the reigning caliph of Baghdad who confi rmed him Sultan-Azmi (great Sultan). In return, Iltutmish described himself as the ‘Lieutenant’ of the caliph and the name of caliph was inscribed on the coins issued by him and this strengthened his position still more. He issued a purely Arabic coinage of silver and was the fi rst to do so. He was the real founder of Delhi Sultanate and an architect of its administration. He eliminated the refractory nobles from all-important posts and organized a band of his own forty trusted nobles called ‘Turkan-I-Chihalgani’ (Chalisa). He organised the Iqta System and introduced reforms in civil administration and army, which was now centrally paid and recruited. He completed Qutub Minar in A.D. 1231-32 named after a Sufi saint Khwaja Qutb-ud-din Kaki, a native of Ush area in Baghdad. He extended the screen walls of the Quwwatul Islam Mosque constructed by Qutb-ud-din. Minhaj-us-Siraj, his contemporary historian too praised him. Raziya Sultan (1236-1240 AD) Although Iltutmish nominated his daughter Raziya as his successor, the Qazi of Delhi and Wazir put Ruknuddin Feroz on the throne. When the governor of Multan revolted, Ruknuddin marched to suppress that revolt and Raziya with the support of Amirs of Delhi seized the throne of Delhi Sultanate. She appointed an Abyssinian slave Yakuth as Master of the Royal Horses. 33 Raziya discarded the female apparel and held the court with her face unveiled and even went for hunting and led the army which aroused resentment among the Turkish nobles. In 1240, Altunia, the governor of Bhatinda revolted against her. She went in person to suppress the revolt but Altunia killed Yakuth and took Raziya prisoner. In the meantime, the Turkish nobles put Bahram, another son of Iltutmish on the throne. Raziya won over her captor, Altunia, and after marrying him marched towards Delhi but was defeated and killed. Nasirud-din-Mahmud (1246-1266 AD) After Raziya’s death, two weak rulers Bahram (1240-1242 AD) and Aluddin Masud (12142-46 AD) followed in quick succession. Their brief inglorious rule was marked by nothing else but the invasions of Mongols. In 1246 AD, Nasirud-din Mahmud, another son of Iltutmish ascended the throne. He was a man of peaceful and pious disposition and an excellent calligraphist spending his leisure time in copying Quran. Nasiruddin placed all powers into the hands of his Prime Minister Balban. They worked in perfect harmony except on one occasion when Balban was removed from offi ce for a brief period (1253 AD) at the instigation of Imadud-din Raihan, the leader of the part of Indian Mulsim nobles. As Prime Minister, Balban ruled with a strong hand and crushed the rebellious governors of Bengal, Avadh and Sind, defended the kingdom from Mongols who had marked into the Punjab in 1257 AD. Balban swooped upon the hilly country of Mewat and punished the Mewati marauders. The frontier posts were strongly garrisoned under his able cousin Sher Khan for checking the Mongol inroads and suppressed the refractory elements. After the death of Nasirud-din who had no son, Balban, ascended the throne. The contemporary chronicler Minhaj-us-Siraj had held a high post (chief Quazi) under the Sultan Nasirud-din and dedicated his ‘Tabaqat-i-Nasiri’ to his patron. Balban (1266-1287 AD) The struggle between the sultan and the Turkish nobles continued, till one of the Turkish chiefs. Balban, gradually arrogated all power to himself and fi nally ascended the throne in AD 1266. When Balban became the Sultan, his position was not secure and many Turkish chiefs were hostile to him. The Mongols were looking forward for an opportunity for attacking the Sultanate. The governors of the distant provinces were also trying to become independent rulers. The Indian rulers were also ready to revolt at the smallest opportunity. The law and order situation in the area around Delhi and in the Doab region had deteriorated. In the Ganga-Yamuna doab and Awadh, the roads were infested with the robbers and dacoits, because of which the communication with the eastern areas had become diffi cult. Some of the Rajput zamindars had set up forts in the area, and defi ed the government. The Mewatis had become so bold as to plunder people up to the outskirts of Delhi. To deal with these elements, Balban adopted a stern policy. In the Mewat many were killed. In the area around Badayun, Rajput strongholds were destroyed. Balban ruled in an autocratic manner and worked hard to elevate the position of the Sultan. He did not allow any noble to assume great power. He even formulated the theory of kingship. He introduced Sijda (postration before the monarch) and Paibos (kissing the feet of monarch). 34 The historian Barani, who was himself a great champion of the Turkish nobles, says that Balban Facts to Know remarked ‘whenever I see a base born ignoble man, During Balban’s reign, Firoz had been my eyes burn and I reach in anger for my sword (to the warden of the marches in north- kill him).” (It is not known if Balban actually said these west and had fought many successful words but his attitude towards the non-Turks was battles against the Mongols. that of contempt.) Firoz was called to Delhi as Ariz-i- Balban was not prepared to share power with anyone, Mumalik (Minister of War). not even with his own family. In 1290 AD Firoz murdered Kaimurs and seized the throne. Balban broke the power of the Chahalgani which A group of Khalji nobles led by him was his greatest contribution towards the stability of established the Khalji dynasty. the sultanate. Some scholars call this event as the To kept himself well informed, Balban appointed ‘dynastic revolution’ of 1290 AD.
Recommended publications
  • Medieval History

    Medieval History

    CONTENTS MEDIEVAL HISTORY 1. MAJOR DYNASTIES (EARLY ....... 01-22 2. EARLY MUSLIM INVASIONS ........23-26 MEDIEVAL INDIA 750-1200 AD) 2.1 Early Muslim Invasions ..................24 1.1 Major Dynasties of North ...............02 The Arab Conquest of Sindh ............... 24 India (750-1200 Ad) Mahmud of Ghazni ............................ 24 Introduction .......................................2 Muhammad Ghori ............................. 25 The Tripartite Struggle ........................2 th th The Pratiharas (8 to 10 Century) ........3 3. THE DELHI SULTANATE ................27-52 th th The Palas (8 to 11 Century) ...............4 (1206-1526 AD) The Rashtrakutas (9th to 10th Century) ....5 The Senas (11th to 12th Century) ............5 3.1 The Delhi Sultanate ......................28 The Rajaputa’s Origin ..........................6 Introduction ..................................... 28 Chandellas ........................................6 Slave/Mamluk Dynasty (Ilbari ............ 28 Chahamanas ......................................7 Turks)(1206-1526 AD) Gahadvalas ........................................8 The Khalji Dynasty (1290-1320 AD) ..... 32 Indian Feudalism ................................9 The Tughlaq Dynasty (1320-1414 AD) .. 34 Administration in Northern India ........ 09 The Sayyid Dynasty ........................... 38 between 8th to 12th Century Lodi Dynasty .................................... 38 Nature of Society .............................. 11 Challenges Faced by the Sultanate ...... 39 Rise
  • Qutb Minar: Religion and Power in 13Th-Century India Professor Munis Faruqui (Department of South and Southeast Asian Studies, UC Berkeley)

    Qutb Minar: Religion and Power in 13Th-Century India Professor Munis Faruqui (Department of South and Southeast Asian Studies, UC Berkeley)

    The Making of a Modern Myth Qutb Minar: Religion and Power in 13th-Century India Professor Munis Faruqui (Department of South and Southeast Asian Studies, UC Berkeley) I. Introduction India is the world’s largest democracy, and has the world’s second largest population of Muslims. Over the last few decades, deep religious divisions have appeared between the Hindu majority and the Muslim minority, who comprise 12–15 percent of the population. Extremists in either community have stoked violent religious conflict in ways that will be discussed shortly. Most of the violence in recent history has occurred in the form of pogroms. Most of the victims are Muslims. There are at least two critical threads that link contemporary anti-Muslim violence: first, a rising tide of Hindu nationalism. Second, much of the violence has been continuously stoked by rhetoricians’ use of an exaggerated and distorted history of endless conflict between these two groups—especially during the period when Muslim political authorities dominated northern India (c. 1200–1750). According to Hindu nationalists, the experience under the Muslims was oppressive, the Muslim rulers tyrannical, Hindu temples were destroyed, and so on. So the current anti- Muslim pogroms are payback, as the more extreme elements among the Hindu nationalists openly assert: attacking Muslims today is thus justified for what happened 500, 600, or 700 years ago. Like many groups elsewhere in the world, Hindu nationalists invoke history. Irish Republicanism invokes battles that happened in 1690 and so on. Groups in the Balkans are another example: Serbs, Croats, and Bosniacs have their own histories, and the 1389 battle of Kosovo becomes a central rallying cry for Serbian nationalism.
  • THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY in CAIRO School of Humanities And

    THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY in CAIRO School of Humanities And

    1 THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO School of Humanities and Social Sciences Department of Arab and Islamic Civilizations Islamic Art and Architecture A thesis on the subject of Revival of Mamluk Architecture in the 19th & 20th centuries by Laila Kamal Marei under the supervision of Dr. Bernard O’Kane 2 Dedications and Acknowledgments I would like to dedicate this thesis for my late father; I hope I am making you proud. I am sure you would have enjoyed this field of study as much as I do. I would also like to dedicate this for my mother, whose endless support allowed me to pursue a field of study that I love. Thank you for listening to my complains and proofreads from day one. Thank you for your patience, understanding and endless love. I am forever, indebted to you. I would like to thank my family and friends whose interest in the field and questions pushed me to find out more. Aziz, my brother, thank you for your questions and criticism, they only pushed me to be better at something I love to do. Zeina, we will explore this world of architecture together some day, thank you for listening and asking questions that only pushed me forward I love you. Alya’a and the Friday morning tours, best mornings of my adult life. Iman, thank you for listening to me ranting and complaining when I thought I’d never finish, thank you for pushing me. Salma, with me every step of the way, thank you for encouraging me always. Adham abu-elenin, thank you for your time and photography.
  • Muhommad Bin Tughlaq (By Bhawana Singh)

    Muhommad Bin Tughlaq (By Bhawana Singh)

    Magadh Mahila College Patna University Department of History Bhawana Singh(Guest Faculty) Email id- [email protected] B.A-3rd Year Paper -5, Unit-4 TughlaqDynasty(1320-1413A.D) Muhommad Bin Tughlaq Tughlaq Dynasty was established by Ghazi Malik who assumed the throne under the title Of Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq. After Alauddin Khalji's death from illness in 1316AD, a series of Arrests and assassinations followed with Khusro Khan coming to power after killing Mubarak Khalji,the son of Alauddin Khalji. However, he lacked the support of the nobles and aristocrats of the Khalji dynasty. Thus, the aristocrats invited Ghazi Malik, then the governor of Punjab under the Khalji's to remove Khusro Khan. In 1320AD Ghazi Malik Launched an attack and killed Khusro Khan to assume power. Hence, the Khalji dynasty was then replaced by a new dynasty known as Tughlaq dynasty. Ghiayasuddin Tughlaq raised the kingdom with his capacity, intelligence and peace and succeeded in restoring peace. He was a wise and liberal ruler. He re-established the food law of Alauddin Khalji, suppressed the revolt in the unfriendly provinces and resorted harmony, law and order. He structured aim proved Postal System and encouraged agriculture. But after his mysterious demise his son Jauna Khan succeeded him under the title of Muhammad Bin Tughlaq in 1325AD. MuhammadBinTughlaq(1325-1351A.D) He was the successor of Ghiyasudd in Tughlaq and the second ruler of Tughlaq dynasty. Tarikh-i-Firozshahi of Ziauddin Barni and Kitab-i-rehla of Ibn-Batutah gives detailed information about the rule of Muhammad Bin Tughlaq. Ibn Batutah vistited to India from Morroco during his rule in 1333A.D and was appointed as Qazi of Delhi.
  • Indo-Muslim Historiography During the Reign of Sultanate of Delhi: Its Genesis and Major Trends

    Indo-Muslim Historiography During the Reign of Sultanate of Delhi: Its Genesis and Major Trends

    Pakistan Perspectives Vol. 18, No.2, July-December 2013 Indo-Muslim Historiography during the reign of Sultanate of Delhi: Its genesis and major trends Humera Naz* Abstract This article aims to highlight impacts of Muslim rule on origin and development of Indian historiography. The period of the Sultanate of Delhi is significant for origin and introduction of some trends and traditions in Indian historiography for which we have find no records before this era. This essay is fundamentally based upon the literature review which offers an overview of the historical literature concerning different categories in history produced under the royal aegis. Besides the political history, some new aspects in terms of non-political historical literature are also considered on the basis of the mulfuzat, manaqib and insha literature. The paper explores the idea and concept regarding History was not considered as a recognized science (‘ilm) either secular or religious in medieval India with a specific object and methodology. In spite, as a subject, it was an elegant art and a noble discipline (fan-i sharif). The paper concludes by identifying the major prevailing historiographical trends during this era which were trend setter for the future historians. I anticipate that this endeavor would reveal some extent the true perception about the prevailing traditions and characteristics in Indo-Persian historiography. ––––––––– Introduction Unlike China, Greece and Rome, the literature of the ancient Indian history is not extant. Most of the modern scholars hold the view that before the dawn of the modern age, the people of India never had a developed sense for history writing of any value.1 Rather its accounts seem to be merged in a particular form of religious literature which may not be considered as much authentic.
  • Sayyid Dynasty

    Sayyid Dynasty

    SAYYID DYNASTY The Sayyid dynasty was the fourth dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate, with four rulers ruling from 1414 to 1451. Founded by Khizr Khan, a former governor of Multan, they succeeded the Tughlaq dynasty and ruled the sultanate until they were displaced by the Lodi dynasty. Khizr Khan (1414- 1421 A.D.) He was the founder of Sayyid Dynasty He did not swear any royal title. He was the Governor of Multan. He took advantage of the disordered situation in India after Timur’s invasion. In 1414 A.D. he occupied the throne of Delhi. He brought parts of Surat, Dilapur, and Punjab under his control. But he lost Bengal, Deccan, Gujarat, Jaunpur, Khandesh and Malwa. In 1421 he died. Mubarak Shah, Khizr Khan’s son succeeded him. Mubarak Shah (1421-1434 A.D.) He was the son of Khizr Khan who got Khutba read on his name and issued his own coins. He did not accept the suzerainty of any foreign power. He was the ablest ruler of the dynasty. He subdued the rebellion at Bhatinda and Daob and the revolt by Khokhars Chief Jasrat. He patronised Vahiya Bin Ahmad Sarhind, author of Tarikh-i-Mubarak Shahi. Mubarak Shah was succeeded by two incompetent rulers, Muhammad Shah (AD 1434- 1445) and Alauddin Alam Shah (AD 1445-1450). Most of the provincial kingdoms declared their independence. Hence, Alam Shah surrendered the throne and retired in an inglorious manner to Baduan. Finally Bahlol Lodhi captured the throne of Delhi with the support of Wazir Khan. Muhammad Shah (1434-1445 A.D.) He defeated the ruler of Malwa with the help of Bahlul Lodi, the Governor of Lahore.
  • Islamic Civilisation in the Mediterranean Nicosia, I-4 December 2010

    Islamic Civilisation in the Mediterranean Nicosia, I-4 December 2010

    IRCICA RESEARCH CENTRE FOR ISLAM lC HISTORY, ART AND CULTURE Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic Civilisation in the Mediterranean Nicosia, ı-4 December 2010 Akdeniz'de İslam Medeniyeti Milletlerarası Konferans Tebliğleri Lefkoşa, ı -4 Aralık 20 ı o Türkiye Dlyanet Vakfı .. \ . Islam Araştımıaları Met'k.ezi Kü'rtlphanesi Tas. No: İstanbul2013 The Blazon Western lnfluences on Mamluk Art after the Crusades Sumiyo Okumura* In Mamluk art, w e often see rounded or oval shaped ran k/ runuk (emblems, blazons or coats-of-arms), which are decorated with differentkinds ofheraldic symbols. They were use d by Mamluk amirs to identify the passessors and their status in the structure of Mamluk government. Although many important studies have been conducted on this subject, 1 histarical documents do not give much information ab out the origin of Mamluk emblems. There existed many kinds of emblems that indicated occupations including saqi (cup bearer) with the cup (Fig. 1); dawadar (inkwell holder the secretary or officer) with the pen box (Fig. 2); and djamdar (master of the robe keeper of clothes) with the shape of napkin, barfcP (postman, courier) with straight lines, jukandaf3 (çevgandar = holder of polo stick) with a hall and polo stick, and silahdar (swoi:d bearer) was symbolized with the sword (Fig. 3). The Ayyubid Sultan, Melikü's-Salih Najim al-Din Ayyub (r. 1240-1249) bestawed the emblem of a smail dining table, called Honca 1 Han çe, 4 on an amir who was appointed to the position of jashnkir. Jashnkir was the taster of the Sultan's food and drink.
  • Medieval India TNPSC GROUP – I & II

    Medieval India TNPSC GROUP – I & II

    VETRII IAS STUDY CIRCLE Medieval India TNPSC GROUP – I & II An ISO 9001 : 2015 Institution | Providing Excellence Since 2011 Head Office Old No.52, New No.1, 9th Street, F Block, 1st Avenue Main Road, (Near Istha siddhi Vinayakar Temple), Anna Nagar East – 600102. Phone: 044-2626 5326 | 98844 72636 | 98844 21666 | 98844 32666 Branches SALEM KOVAI No.189/1, Meyanoor Road, Near ARRS Multiplex, No.347, D.S.Complex (3rd floor), (Near Salem New bus Stand), Nehru Street,Near Gandhipuram Opp. Venkateshwara Complex, Salem - 636004. Central Bus Stand, Ramnagar, Kovai - 9 Ph: 0427-2330307 | 95001 22022 Ph: 75021 65390 Educarreerr Location VIVEKANANDHA EDUCATIONA PATRICIAN COLLEGE OF ARTS SREE SARASWATHI INSTITUTIONS FOR WOMEN AND SCIENCE THYAGARAJA COLLEGE Elayampalayam, Tiruchengode - TK 3, Canal Bank Rd, Gandhi Nagar, Palani Road, Thippampatti, Namakkal District - 637 205. Opp. to Kotturpuram Railway Station, Pollachi - 642 107 Ph: 04288 - 234670 Adyar, Chennai - 600020. Ph: 73737 66550 | 94432 66008 91 94437 34670 Ph: 044 - 24401362 | 044 - 24426913 90951 66009 www.vetriias.com © VETRII IAS STUDY CIRCLE First Edition – 2015 Second Edition – 2019 Pages : 114 Size : (240 × 180) cm Price : 220/- Published by: VETRII IAS STUDY CIRCLE F Block New No. 1, 9th Street, 1st Avenue main Road, Chinthamani, Anna Nagar (E), Chennai – 102. Phone: 044-2626 5326 | 98844 72636 | 98844 21666 | 98844 32666 www.vetriias.com E-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] / [email protected] Feedback: [email protected] © All rights reserved with the publisher. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the written permission of the publisher, will be responsible for the loss and may be punished for compensation under copyright act.
  • Copyright by Mohammad Raisur Rahman 2008

    Copyright by Mohammad Raisur Rahman 2008

    Copyright by Mohammad Raisur Rahman 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Mohammad Raisur Rahman certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Islam, Modernity, and Educated Muslims: A History of Qasbahs in Colonial India Committee: _____________________________________ Gail Minault, Supervisor _____________________________________ Cynthia M. Talbot _____________________________________ Denise A. Spellberg _____________________________________ Michael H. Fisher _____________________________________ Syed Akbar Hyder Islam, Modernity, and Educated Muslims: A History of Qasbahs in Colonial India by Mohammad Raisur Rahman, B.A. Honors; M.A.; M.Phil. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2008 Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to the fond memories of my parents, Najma Bano and Azizur Rahman, and to Kulsum Acknowledgements Many people have assisted me in the completion of this project. This work could not have taken its current shape in the absence of their contributions. I thank them all. First and foremost, I owe my greatest debt of gratitude to my advisor Gail Minault for her guidance and assistance. I am grateful for her useful comments, sharp criticisms, and invaluable suggestions on the earlier drafts, and for her constant encouragement, support, and generous time throughout my doctoral work. I must add that it was her path breaking scholarship in South Asian Islam that inspired me to come to Austin, Texas all the way from New Delhi, India. While it brought me an opportunity to work under her supervision, I benefited myself further at the prospect of working with some of the finest scholars and excellent human beings I have ever known.
  • Alauddin Khalji's Conquest of Malwa

    Alauddin Khalji's Conquest of Malwa

    Alauddin Khalji's conquest of Malwa Alauddin Khilji: the greatest ruler of the Khilji Dynasy in India! Alauddin Khilji (d.o.b. unknown-1316) was the greatest ruler of the Khilji Dynasy in India. During his reign, he successfully invaded 6 territories, conquering all of these territories in Northern India. Khilji also conquered territories in Southern India as well. After all of the conquests of India, he took control of all of the nobility. Khilji died of edema. Alauddin Khilji was born in Delhi in 1266 CE, lived his entire life in the Indian subcontinent, and ruled as sultan of Delhi from 1296 CE â“ 1316 CE. By any definition, he would have to be called an Indian monarch, not a foreign invader. As a ruler, he would prove himself to be one of Indiaâ™s greatest warrior kings and one of the worldâ™s great military geniuses. Khilji greatly expanded the empire that he inherited from his uncle, Sultan Jalaluddin Khilji, after killing him. Many of his conquests were of kingdoms ruled by Hindu kings, including Chittor, Devgiri, Warangal (from where he acquired the famous Kohinoor diamond), Gujarat, Ranthambore, and the Hoysala and Pandya kingdoms. In 1299, the Delhi Sultanate ruler Alauddin Khalji sent an army to ransack the Gujarat region of India, which was ruled by the Vaghela king Karna. The Delhi forces plundered several major cities of Gujarat, including Anahilavada (Patan), Khambhat, Surat and Somnath. Karna was able to regain control of at least a part of his kingdom in the later years. However, in 1304, a second invasion by Alauddin's forces permanently ended the Vaghela dynasty, and resulted in the annexation of Gujarat to the Delhi In 1305, the Delhi Sultanate ruler Alauddin Khalji sent an army to capture the Paramara kingdom of Malwa in central India.
  • Coins of Delhi Sultanate

    Coins of Delhi Sultanate

    Coins of Delhi Sultanate 5.1 Do you know Description Image Source Once the Delhi sultanate was firmly established in the 13th century, Indian coinage underwent a major change. The ancient pictorial tradition of coinage gave way to the so-called Islamic type of coins which were sans any pictorial motif. Islamic type of coins had inscription written in Arabic script on both the sides and furnished more information than their ancient counter parts. It offers Religious and Secular information The Khalji sultan Alauddin Muhammad Shah (1296-1316 CE), discarded the name of Abbasid Caliph from his coins and called himself Yamin- ul Khilafat (right hand of Caliph). The title was used for the first time by an Indian ruler. He also adopted the title of sikander-us-sani (Second Alexander). This indicates that he was well aware of the importance of Alexander, and wanted to be recognised as the second Alexander. Qutubuddin Mubarak (1316-1320 CE), the successor of Alauddin Khalji is known to have issued coins in gold, silver, billon and copper. He made a remarkable change in his coin inscription as he has not only discarded the name of Abbasid caliph but declared himself as caliph and called himself khalifullah (caliph of Allah) and Khalifah rabil alemin (caliph of the lord of the world). He also adopted the title of sikander uz zaman. Muhammad bin Tughluq (1325-1351 CE) introduced token currency in bronze. It weighed around 10 gm. and ruler has asked to accept this bronze tanka at the rate of silver tanka current in the market.
  • 1 Component-I (A) – Personal Details

    1 Component-I (A) – Personal Details

    Component-I (A) – Personal details: 1 Component-I (B) – Description of module: Subject Name Indian Culture Paper Name Outlines of Indian History Module Name/Title The slave dynasty (1206-1290) Module Id I C/ OIH/ 20 Knowledge in Medieval Indian History and Delhi Pre-requisites Sultanate To know the History of Slave/ Mamluk dynasty Objectives and their role in Delhi sultanate Qutb-ud-din Aibak / Iltutmish/ Razia / Balban / Keywords Slave / Mamluk / Delhi Sultanate E-text (Quadrant-I) 1. Introduction The Sultanate of Delhi, said to have been formally founded by Qutb-ud-din Aibak, one of the Viceroys of Muhammad Ghori. It is known as the Sultanate of Delhi because during the greater part of the Sultanate, its capital was Delhi. The Sultanate of Delhi (1206–1526) had five ruling dynasties viz., 1) The Slave dynasty (1206-1290), 2) The Khilji Dynasty (1290–1320) 3), The Tughlaq Dynasty (1320–1414), 4) The Sayyad Dynasty (1414–1451) and 5) The Lodi dynasty (1451–1526). The first dynasty of the Sultanate has been designated by various historians as ‘The Slave’, ‘The Early Turk’, ‘The Mamluk’ and ‘The Ilbari’ 2. Slave/Mamluk Dynasty 2.1. Qutb-ud-din Aibak (1206 – 1210) Qutb-ud-din Aibak was the founder of the Slave/Mamluk dynasty. He was the Turk of the Aibak tribe. In his childhood he was first purchased by a kind hearted Qazi of Nishapur as Slave. He received education in Islamic theory and swordmanship along with the son of his master. When Qazi died, he was sold by his son to a merchant who took him to Ghazni where he was purchased by Muhammad Ghori.