DOCSLIB.ORG

Florida Forever Work Plan 2004 Annual Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Florida Forever Work Plan 2004 Annual Update South Florida Water Management District Florida Forever Work Plan 2004 Annual Update Contributors Ross Adair Carla Palmer Fred Davis Tracey Piccone Max Day Dean Powell Deborah Drum Dawn Rose Juan Diaz-Carreras Shawn Sculley Patrick Gostel Teri Short William Helfferich Patti Sime Lewis Hornung Wanda Caffi e-Simpson Jim Jackson Janet Starnes Sally Kennedy Lesa Tucker Kim O’Dell David Unsell Florida Forever Work Plan Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary xiii List of Tables vi List of Figures vii List of Abbreviations and Acronyms viii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Legislation (Florida Forever and Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan...........2 Florida Forever Performance Measures.......................................................................10 Project Rankings, Schedule and Resources .................................................................10 Chapter 2: Regional Study Area 13 Future without Plan Condition – Physical Facilities and Operations – the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control Project (Project Modifications) ................................15 Water Quality Problems and Opportunities – Regional Overview..............................15 Water Quality Problems and Opportunities – Mercury ...............................................17 Land Use ......................................................................................................................17 Study Purpose ..............................................................................................................19 Study Scope .................................................................................................................19 Other Studies................................................................................................................20 Permits and Authorizations..........................................................................................20 Interim Land Management...........................................................................................21 Chapter 3: Kissimmee Region 23 Physical Conditions – Kissimmee Region...................................................................23 Existing Condidtions – Kissimmee Region Water Management ................................26 i Table of Contents Florida Forever Work Plan Future without Plan Condition – Water Quality – Kissimmee Region .......................28 Future without Plan Condition – Physical Facilities and Operations – Kissimmee River Restoration .........................................................................................................29 Water Quality Problems and Opportunities – Kissimmee Region ..............................30 Land Use – Kissimmee Region....................................................................................32 Eligible Kissimmee Region Projects ...........................................................................34 Chapter 4: Lake Okeechobee Watershed Region 45 Physical Conditions – Lake Okeechobee Watershed Region......................................45 Existing Conditions – Lake Okeechobee Water Management ....................................46 Future Without Plan Condition – Water Quality – Lake Okeechobee ........................49 Future without Plan Condition – Physical Facilities and Operations – Manatee Protection ....................................................................................................................49 Future without Plan Condition – Physical Facilities and Operations – Lake Okeechobee Regulation Schedule................................................................................49 Future without Plan Condition – Physical Facilities and Operations – Critical Restoration Projects .....................................................................................................50 Water Quality Problems and Opportunities – Lake Okeechobee ................................50 Land Use – Lake Okeechobee Region.........................................................................51 Eligible Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) Projects.....................52 Other Eligible Projects.................................................................................................52 Chapter 5: Lower West Coast Region 55 Physical Conditions – Lower West Coast Region .......................................................55 Existing Conditions – Lower West Coast Region Water Management.......................56 Future without Plan Condition – Physical Facilities and Operations – Critical Restoration Projects .....................................................................................................58 Future without Plan Condition – Water Quality – Lower West Coast Region............59 Water Quality Problems and Opportunities – Lower West Coast Region...................60 Land Use – Lower West Coast Region........................................................................61 ii Florida Forever Work Plan Table of Contents Eligible Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) Projects.....................65 Other Eligible Projects.................................................................................................66 Chapter 6: Upper East Coast Region 73 Physical Conditions – Upper East Coast Region.........................................................73 Existing Condition – Upper East Coast Water Management.......................................74 Future without Plan Condition – Physical Facilities and Operations – Critical Restoration Projects .....................................................................................................78 Future without Plan Condition – Water Quality – Upper East Coast..........................78 Water Quality Problems and Opportunities – Upper East Coast.................................79 Land Use – Upper East Coast ......................................................................................80 Eligible Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) Projects.....................81 Other Eligible Projects.................................................................................................82 Chapter 7: Everglades Agricultural Area 85 Physical Conditions – Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) ......................................85 Existing Conditions – Everglades Agriculture Area (EAA) Water Management .......86 Future without Plan Condition – Water Quality – Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) ....................................................................................................................86 Water Quality Problems and Opportunities – Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA)..91 Land Use – Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) .......................................................92 Eligible Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) Projects.....................94 Chapter 8: Everglades, Florida Bay and Keys Regions 95 Physical Condition – Everglades, Florida Bay and Keys Regions ..............................95 Existing Conditions – Water Conservation Areas (WCAS) Water Management .......98 Existing Conditions – Everglades National Park and Florida Bay Water Management...............................................................................................................101 Existing Conditions – Florida Keys Water Management ..........................................103 iii Table of Contents Florida Forever Work Plan Future without Plan Condition – Water Quality – Natural Areas..............................103 Future without Plan Condition – Water Quality – Florida Bay.................................103 Future without Plan Condition – Water Quality – Florida Keys ...............................104 Future without Plan Condition – Physical Facilities and Operations – Water Conservation Areas (WCAS) and Everglades National Park Rainfall-Based Rainfall Water Delivery Plans.................................................................................................104 Future without Plan Condition – Physical Facilities and Operations – Emergency Interim Plan................................................................................................................104 Water Quality Problems and Opportunities – Natural Areas.....................................105 Water Quality Problems and Opportunities – Florida Bay........................................106 Water Quality Problems and Opportunities – Florida Keys ......................................106 Land Use – Water Conservation Areas (WCAS) ......................................................107 Land Use – Everglades National Park and Florida Bay ............................................110 Land Use – Florida Keys ...........................................................................................111 Eligible Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) Projects...................114 Other Eligible Projects...............................................................................................116 Chapter 9: Water Preserve Areas, Miami-Dade County and North Palm Beach County Regions 117 Physical Conditions – Water Preserve Areas, Miami-Dade County and North Palm Beach County Regions...............................................................................................117 Existing Conditions – Water Preserve Areas, Miami-Dade County and North Palm Beach County.............................................................................................................119 Future without Plan Condition –
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Resolution 2015-139
    Sponsored by: Puto CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA RESOLUTION 2015-139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARATHON' FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE 2015 UPDATE oF THE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY AS REQUIRE,D BY STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS TO QUALIFY FOR CERTAIN MITIGATION GRANT F.UNDING; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Marathon Council adopted a Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) update in2005, and an update in2011; and WHEREAS, Monroe County and the cities of Key West, Key Colony Beach, Layton, Islamorada, and Marathon have experienced hurricanes and other natural hazañ,events that pose risks to public health and safety and which may cause serious property damage; and WHEREAS, the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Management Act, as amended by the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, requires local jurisdictions to adopt mitigation plans in order to be eligible for post-disaster and pre-clisaster grants to implement Ãrtain mitigation projects; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Section2TP-22, the County and municipalities must have a formal LMS Working Group ancl the I-MS Working Group must review and update the LMS every five years in order to maintain eligibility for mitigation grant programs; and WHEREAS, the National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994, the Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2004, as amended, require local jurisdictions to aclopt a mitigation to be eligible for grants to implement certain flood mitigation projects; and WHEREAS, the planning process required by the State of Florida
    [Show full text]
  • Central Keys Area Reasonable Assurance Documentation
    Central Keys Area Reasonable Assurance Documentation F K R A D FKRAD Program December 2008 Prepared for FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Watershed Management Bureau Tallahassee, Florida Prepared by Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. URS Corporation Southern 1715 N. Westshore Boulevard 7650 Courtney Campbell Causeway Tampa, Florida 33607 Tampa, Florida 33607 Florida Department of Environmental Protection REASONABLE ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION CENTRAL KEYS AREA F K R A D December 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Central Keys Area Reasonable Assurance Document was developed under the direction of Mr. Fred Calder and Mr. Pat Fricano of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) with the assistance of the following stakeholder’s representatives: Ms. Suzy Thomas, Director of Community Services and Mr. Mike Hatfield, P.E., Weiler Engineering, City of Marathon Mr. Clyde Burnett, Mayor/City Administrator, City of Key Colony Beach; Mr. Philip “Skip” Haring, Assistant to Mayor City of Layton; Ms. Elizabeth Wood, P.E., Wastewater Section Chief, Monroe County; Mr. Jaime Barrera, FDOT District VI; and Mr. Fred Hand, Bureau of Facilities, FDEP. The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments review comments of the Stakeholders technical representatives and Mr. Gus Rios, Manager of FDEP’s Marathon Service Office. The document was developed a collaborative effort led by Mr. Scott McClelland of CDM Inc. and Mr. Stephen Lienhart of URS Corporation. S:\FDEP\Central RAD\FKRAD Central Cover and Prelim.doc i Florida Department of Environmental Protection REASONABLE ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION CENTRAL KEYS AREA F K R A D December 2008 Central Keys Area Stakeholders Documents As a measure of reasonable assurance and support of this document, the stakeholders in the Central Keys Area (City of Marathon, City of Key Colony Beach, City of Layton, Monroe County, FDOT and the Florida State Parks Service) have provided signed documents confirming that the management activities identified in this document indeed reflect the commitments of the stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Coastal Element Data Inventory and Analysis
    City of Marathon Comprehensive Plan CONSERVATION AND COASTAL ELEMENT DATA INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS This section addresses the data inventory requirements supportive of the development of goals, objectives, policies, and implementation programs for the Conservation and Coastal Element. (§9J-5.012(2) and §9J-5.013(1), F.A.C.) Environmental Setting of Marathon and the Florida Keys The low-lying limestone islands comprising the Florida Keys extend 233 miles southwestward in a gradual arc from Biscayne bay at the southeastern tip of the Florida peninsula to the Dry Tortugas in the Gulf of Mexico. Southeast of the Keys is the Florida Reef Tract, a continuous band of coral reefs bordering the Straits of Florida, lying five to seven miles offshore and extending 220 miles from Solider Key to the Dry Tortugas. To the west and northwest is Florida Bay, a shallow embayment of the Gulf of Mexico with an extensive network of carbonate mud shoals and seagrass beds (Florida DER, 1987d). At the top of the Upper Keys, Card Sound and Barnes Sound are shallow embayments which tie into Biscayne Bay. Climate Marathon and the Florida Keys experience a subtropical savanna-type climate characterized by warm humid summers and mild dry winters. The mean annual sunshine is 3,300 hours, ten percent more than the Florida Peninsula to the north. The average annual temperature in the Florida Keys ranges from a summer high of 89 degrees in July to a winter low of 63 degrees in February. Temperatures below freezing have not been recorded in the Keys, primarily due to the meliorative effects of the warm marine waters in the area and the presence of the warm Gulf Stream along the coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Forever Work Plan
    Florida Forever Work Plan January 1, 2003 prepared by South Florida Water Management District Florida Forever Work Plan Contributors South Florida Water Management District Florida Forever Work Plan January 1, 2003 Contributors Christine Carlson Dolores Cwalino Fred Davis Jude Denick Juan Diaz-Carreras Andy Edwards Paul Ellis William Helfferich Sally Kennedy Phil Kochan Tom McCracken Kim O’Dell Steve Reel Bonnie Rose Dawn Rose Wanda Caffie-Simpson Andrea Stringer iii Florida Forever Work Plan Contributors iv Florida Forever Work Plan Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 1999, the Florida Forever program was created, which authorized the issuance of bonds in an amount not to exceed $3 billion for acquisitions of land and water areas. This revenue is to be used for the purposes of restoration, conservation, recreation, water resource development, historical preservation and capital improvements to the acquired land and water. The program is intended to accomplish environmental restoration, enhance public access and recreational enjoyment, promote long-term management goals and facilitate water resource development. The water management districts create a five-year plan that identifies projects meeting specific criteria for the Florida Forever program. Each district integrates its surface water improvement and management plans, Save Our Rivers (SOR) land acquisition lists, stormwater management projects, proposed water resource development and water body restoration projects and other activities that support the goals of Florida Forever. Thirty-five percent of the Florida Forever bond proceeds are distributed annually to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for land acquisition and capital expenditures in order to implement the priority lists submitted by the water management districts.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Southern Florida's Native Plant Heritage
    A publication of The Institute for Regional Conservation’s Restoring South Florida’s Native Plant Heritage program Copyright 2002 The Institute for Regional Conservation ISBN Number 0-9704997-0-5 Published by The Institute for Regional Conservation 22601 S.W. 152 Avenue Miami, Florida 33170 www.regionalconservation.org [email protected] Printed by River City Publishing a division of Titan Business Services 6277 Powers Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 32217 Cover photos by George D. Gann: Top: mahogany mistletoe (Phoradendron rubrum), a tropical species that grows only on Key Largo, and one of South Florida’s rarest species. Mahogany poachers and habitat loss in the 1970s brought this species to near extinction in South Florida. Bottom: fuzzywuzzy airplant (Tillandsia pruinosa), a tropical epiphyte that grows in several conservation areas in and around the Big Cypress Swamp. This and other rare epiphytes are threatened by poaching, hydrological change, and exotic pest plant invasions. Funding for Rare Plants of South Florida was provided by The Elizabeth Ordway Dunn Foundation, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, and the Steve Arrowsmith Fund. Major funding for the Floristic Inventory of South Florida, the research program upon which this manual is based, was provided by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and the Steve Arrowsmith Fund. Part 3. Other Critically Imperiled Plants Adiantum melanoleucum Willd. Fragrant Maidenhair South Florida Status: Critically imperiled. Three occurrences in two conservation areas (Everglades National Park; Harden Hammock), and one government owned non-conservation area (Troop 69 Boy Scout Site). Taxonomy: Pteridophyte; Adiantaceae. Habit: Perennial lithophytic herb. Distribution: Native to South Florida and the West Indies.
    [Show full text]
  • Curry Hammock State Park 2016
    Curry Hammock State Park APPROVED Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks December 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 7 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 7 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 8 Management Coordination ................................................................... 9 Public Participation ..............................................................................9 Other Designations .............................................................................9 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 12 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 12 Topography .................................................................................. 12 Geology ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Biting and Predaceous Midges from Florida, Including Species New to the Fauna of the United States (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 10-15-2010 New records of biting and predaceous midges from Florida, including species new to the fauna of the United States (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) William L. Grogan Jr. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, [email protected] Lawrence J. Hribar Florida Keys Mosquito Control District, [email protected] C. Steven Murphree Belmont University, [email protected] James E. Cilek Florida A & M University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Grogan, William L. Jr.; Hribar, Lawrence J.; Murphree, C. Steven; and Cilek, James E., "New records of biting and predaceous midges from Florida, including species new to the fauna of the United States (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae)" (2010). Insecta Mundi. 667. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/667 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0147 New records of biting and predaceous midges from Florida, including species new to the fauna of the United States (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) William L. Grogan, Jr. Florida State Collection of Arthropods Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Gainesville, Florida 32614 U.S.A. Lawrence J. Hribar Florida Keys Mosquito Control District 503 107th Street Marathon, Florida 33050 U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Curry Hammock State Park Unit Management Plan
    CURRY HAMMOCK STATE PARK UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks FEBRUARY 11, 2005 Department of Environmental Protection Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building Jeb Bush 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, MS 140 Colleen Castille Governor Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Secretary Phone: (850) 245-2784 Fax: (850) 245-2786 February 11, 2005 Ms. BryAnne White Office of Park Planning Division of Recreation and Parks 3900 Commonwealth Blvd.; M.S. 525 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Re: Curry Hammock State Park Lease #3938 Dear Ms. White: On February 11, 2005, the Acquisition and Restoration Council recommended approval of the Curry Hammock State Park management plan. Therefore, the Office of Environmental Services, acting as agent for the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, approved the management plan for the Curry Hammock State Park. Pursuant to Sections 253.034 and 259.032, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 18-2, Florida Administrative Code this plan’s ten-year update will be due on February 11, 2015. Approval of this land management plan does not waive the authority or jurisdiction of any governmental entity that may have an interest in this project. Implementation of any upland activities proposed by this management plan may require a permit or other authorization from federal and state agencies having regulatory jurisdiction over those particular activities. Pursuant to the conditions of your lease, please forward copies of all permits to this office upon issuance. Sincerely, Paula L. Allen Office of Environmental Services Division of State Lands Department of Environmental Protection "More Protection, Less Process” Printed on recycled paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Keys Regional Working Group
    Florida Keys Regional Working Group MONROE COUNTY (part) The Florida Keys Regional Working Group liaison is Alison Higgins, The Nature Conservancy, P.O. Box 420237, Summerland Key, Florida, 33042, phone: 305-745-8402, fax: 305-745-8399, e-mail: [email protected] 30 Key West Naval Air Station County: Monroe PCL Size: 6,323 Project ID: FK-046 18.65 acres $73,177.76 Project ID: FK-053 45.00 acres $24,691.15 Project Manager: U.S. Navy Edward Barham, Natural Resources Manager Post Office Box 9007, Key West, Florida 33040-9007 Phone: 305-293-2911, Fax: 305-293-2542 E-mail: [email protected] Two projects occurred at Key West NAS; one for initial control and one for maintenance control. Initial control conducted on Big Coppitt Key and Geiger Key targeted Australian pine. Big Coppitt Key is a filled, scarified area within the Key West NAS Fish and Wildlife Management Area MU-5. The site is approximately 0.65 acres and is adjacent to mangrove wetlands and open water. Geiger Key is a former “Hawk Missile Site” and comprises approximately 18 acres. The second project area encompassed a natural beach berm along the Atlantic Ocean located on Key West NAS property on Boca Chica and Geiger Keys. This area is habitat for wildlife, including the endangered Lower Keys marsh rabbit (Sylvilagus palustris hefneri). Rapidly expanding populations of invasive exotic plant species infested the beach berm. The two primary invaders were lather leaf and Brazilian pepper. Also present, to a much lesser extent, were Australian pine and seaside mahoe.
    [Show full text]
  • ATTACHMENT 5 Biological Information on Covered Species
    ATTACHMENT 5 Biological Information on Covered Species and Special Status Plants Environmental Assessment for the Coral Reef Commons Project Incidental Take Permit Application Abbreviations/Acronyms Act Endangered Species Act of 1973 APAFR Avon Park Air Force Range ATV All-terrain Vehicle BCNP Big Cypress National Preserve BSHB Bartram’s scrub-hairstreak butterfly CFR Code of Federal Regulations CH Critical Habitat CRC Coral Reef Commons Project DERM Miami-Dade Department of Environmental Resource Management EEL Environmentally Endangered Lands ENP Everglades National Park\ FBC Florida Bat Conservancy FDOT Florida Department of Transportation FNAI Florida Natural Area Inventory FPNWR Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge FR Federal Register FTBG Fairchild Tropical Botanical Garden FWC Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission GA DNR Georgia Department of Natural Resources GTC Gopher Tortoise Council HCP Habitat Conservation Plan Indigo Snake Eastern indigo snake IRC Institute for Regional Conservation JDSP Jonathan Dickinson State Park Leafwing Florida leafwing butterfly LTDS Line Transect Distance Sampling MDC Miami-Dade County MVP Minimal viable population NAM Natural Areas Management NCSU North Carolina State University NFC Natural Forest Community NKDR National Key Deer Refuge NPS National Park Service Service United States Fish and Wildlife Service SOCSOUTH United States Army Special Operations Command Center South SWP Seminole Wayside Park TNC The Nature Conservancy UM University of Miami USCG United States Coast Guard USDA United States Department of Agriculture US Highway 1 US 1 WMA Wildlife Management Area 5-i Attachment 5 - Biological Information on Covered Species and Special Status Plants Bartram’s Scrub-Hairstreak Butterfly (endangered) Legal Status: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) listed the Bartram’s scrub-hairstreak butterfly (Strymon acis bartrami; BSHB) as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act) (87 Stat.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Reef Habitat Assessment for U.S. Marine Protected Areas
    Coral Reef Habitat Assessment for U.S. Marine Protected Areas: State of Florida: Dry Tortugas to Biscayne Bay National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA’s National Ocean Service Management & Budget Office Special Projects February 2009 Project Overview About this Effort NCCOS Habitat Mapping Effort The United States Coral Reef Task Force (USCRTF), in both its National The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Action Plan to Conserve Coral Reefs (2000) and its National Coral Reef Ocean Service (NOS) initiated a coral reef research program in 1999 to Action Strategy (2002), established a key conservation objective of protect- map, assess, inventory, and monitor U.S. coral reef ecosystems (Monaco et ing at least 20% of U.S. coral reefs and associated habitat types in no-take al. 2001). These activities were implemented in response to requirements marine reserves. NOAA’s Coral Reef Conservation Program has been outlined in the Mapping Implementation Plan developed by the Mapping supporting efforts to assess current protection levels of coral reefs within and Information Synthesis Working Group (MISWG) of the Coral Reef Task Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and quantify the area of U.S. coral reef Force (CRTF) (MISWG 1999). NOS’s National Centers for Coastal Ocean ecosystems protected in no-take reserves. The official federal definition of Science (NCCOS) Biogeography Team was charged with the development an MPA, signed into law by Executive Order 13158, is “any area of the ma- and implementation of a plan to produce comprehensive digital coral-reef rine environment that has been reserved by federal, state, tribal, territorial, ecosystem maps for all U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Potable Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities
    DD PPoottaabbllee WWaatteerr aanndd WWaasstteewwaatteerr TTrreeaattmmeenntt FFaacciilliittiieess POTABLE WATER TREATMENT FACILITIES In the Lower East Coast (LEC) Planning Area, potable water is produced by large water treatment facilities, smaller “package” water treatment facilities, and private wells supplying individual users. This appendix focuses on large facilities with average withdrawals of water equal to or greater than 100,000 gallons per day or 0.1 million gallons per day (MGD). Descriptions of Existing Facilities Table D-1 presents summary descriptions for each of the large potable water treatment facilities and their withdrawal (water) sources located in the LEC Planning Area. The table contains the name of the utility or supply entity, the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) consumptive use permit number, annual water allocation in MGD, raw water withdrawal sources, volume withdrawn in 2010, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) water treatment facility permit number and rated (design) capacity. Figures D-1 through D-3 show the locations of potable water treatment facilities in Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami-Dade counties, respectively. Additional information about the water sources — Surficial Aquifer System (SAS), Floridan Aquifer System (FAS), Upper Floridan aquifer, and surface water — is available from the SFWMD Water Use Regulatory Database, which is accessible online from the following link: http://my.sfwmd.gov/ePermitting/MainPage.do. More information regarding the potable water treatment plants permitted by the FDEP can be found at the following site: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/drinkingwater/bfr.htm. 2012 LEC Water Supply Plan Update | 1 Table D-1. Potable water treatment facilities in the LEC Planning Area.
    [Show full text]