Digital Activism and Social Movements: How the World Perceives the Gezi Movement Dr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Digital Activism and Social Movements: How the World Perceives the Gezi Movement Dr Amity Journal of Media & Communication Studies Copyright 2015 by ASCO 2015, Vol. 5, No. 1 – 2, 16-26 Amity University Rajasthan (ISSN 2231 – 1033) Digital Activism and Social Movements: How the World perceives the Gezi Movement Dr. Ece Baban Assistant Professor Okan University Email ID: [email protected] Dr. Ebru Güzel Assistant Professor Okan University Email ID: [email protected] Internet activism (also known as online activism, digital campaigning, digital activism, online organizing, electronic advocacy, cyberactivism, e-campaigning, and e-activism) is the use of electronic communication technologies such as social media, especially Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, e-mail, and podcasts for various forms of activism to enable faster communication by citizen movements and the delivery of local information to a large audience. From Occupy to Uncut, from the Arab Spring to the Slutwalk movement, few questions about recent activism raise as much controversy as the role of the internet. This study covers two main issues; one of them is the way activists use the new media and the second is how the new media affects the globalization of social activities. The study investigated the Arab Spring, the Occupy Wall Street and the London Revolt as examples of digital activism in the world. The study also offers the Gezi Parkı events as an example from Turkey. It mentions some groups such as Occupy Gezi New York Action Group, Occupy Gezi Deutschland, Occupy Gezi Milano that were formed to use the new media to promote digital activities. These groups that are formed on facebook have investigated the use of the new media according to Morozov's new media strategies. Keywords: Digital Activism, Social Media, Social Movements, Occupy Gezi “To radically shift regime behavior we must think clearly the internet. The influence area of digital activism and boldly for if we have learned anything, it is that has increased due to the globalization and the regimes do not want to be changed. Every time we internet. witness an act that we feel to be unjust and do not act, we The fact that the digital activism became a part of become a party to injustice.“ (Julian Assange, our daily lives began with the emergence of Conspiracy as Governance, December 2, 2006). Wikileaks by the late 2010. The fact that especially activists who were be in search of democracy used DIGITAL ACTIVISM HISTORY social media platforms together with Arab Spring Digital activism history is concurrent with internet process to make their voices heard showed how history. Digital Activism is the fact that individuals, effective was the digital activism experienced at the by benefiting from the rapid propagation present day. After the addition of Occupy Wall characteristics of the network structures and Street! 'actions and London riots, it became possible information technology, intend and execute actions to see occupation movements that become which can grow independently from the center on widespread by globalization on different topics in cases, thoughts or events social and / or political almost every country. issues such as freedom of expression, human rights or the environment that they defend or react, and There are three defining principles of social the main objective of which is to be able to produce movements: The common identity of the movement, high public voice and momentum. Due to the anti-motion and social objective criteria (Castells, growing technological infrastructure along with the Touraine). According to Manuel Castells, these globalization, people have become easier to reach 16 concepts should be understood as follows. Identity media platforms used by people to be organized, corresponds to what the movement is and on behalf was one of the outstanding hashtags (Ntvmsnbc, of whom does it speak; anti corresponds to the main 2011). enemy defined by the movement; social objective People of all age groups participated in the action, corresponds to social order or the form of social and the age group constituting the majority was organization that the collective action of the between 15-35 years. The most important reason that movement wants to ensure in its historical horizon. there were more participants from this age group was the fact that they used the internet more All around the world, riots resulting from different frequently. While those who participated in the social problems of the countries have broken out movement were walking, they also shared the and continue to break out. It is possible to see these movement on social sharing sites by using the riots and various social explosions in Latin America, internet, and they conveyed what they experienced mass demonstrations of European working class, the and felt and the photos they took to the world via youth actions and immigrants' riots, riots of the the internet. The movement of don't touch my Arab peoples, the mass strikes took place in Greece internet gained globosity due to social platforms on and the events took place in England. Riots make the Internet. trouble, wounds, inequality and injustice which are rendered invisible a current issue and lead to public Another movement of don't touch my internet took debate. Examples of digital activism were place on January 18, 2014. On social media organizing on social media platforms and arose on platforms, people were invited to go out on January the streets. Streets are places where the demand for 18 at 18:00 and to be organized in different cities in justice emerges in its purest form. In order to Turkey to say stop internet censorship with the understand the concept of digital activism, Gezi #18Ocak18DeSokaklara hashtag. Aslo, RedHack Park protests seen after the protest of "Don't touch group gave support to the riot via Twitter. my internet" in Turkey with some of the digital activism movements that occurred in the world will The identity of this riot was composed of group of be examined. people of all ages who protested against restrictions and censorship. The movement emerged to protest DIGITAL ACTIVISM AND GEZI MOVEMENT IN TURKEY the prevention of internet users' right to freedom of In Turkey, the most crowded movement among expression and access to information. The social those held by organizing via social sharing networks objective is to ensure that internet usage and open for the first time was the "Do not touch my Internet and unfiltered access are seen as a basic human right movement" which took place in 2011. By the as in international organizations. The movement of decision of BTK (information and communication don't touch my internet is evaluated in the new technologies authority), people who oppose the ban social movements in terms of its aims, values and and censorship on the Internet achieved a wide organization. The movement of don't touch my support and took a joint action on May 15, 2011. internet that we discuss as an example of digital Against the system which would bring a new filter activism in Turkey is involved in type of Internet- to the Internet said to be implemented in August 22, enabled activism from types of digital activism. 2011, hundreds of thousands of Internet users set u p During this movement process, people organized Facebook and Twitter groups, organized on these protests and walkings and held demonstrations. The platforms and protested in the street. Simultaneous people, who used social media platforms in order to demonstrations were held in a total of 28 provinces organize, had the entry into force of the law in Turkey and then in 3 countries (Germany, postponed due to the protests they carried out. In Austria, the Netherlands) with the globalization of brief, the movement of don't touch my internet demonstration abroad. #22agustos, which was used which was initiated for internet censorship as the to draw attention to the filtering that would begin first digital activism movement in Turkey took place on August 22 on Twitter which is one of the social with dozens of participants and was successful. The 17 movement of don't touch my internet is evaluated in event. Social media is a tool which accelerates an the new social movements in terms of its aims, effect very quickly and ensures its concentration and values and organization. Tens of thousands of increase in its power. Also, the fact that the number people organized via internet and performed their of people who use social media in Turkey is great actions on the street. This is also an important leads to great effect. Taksim Gezi Park resistance example of the actual digital activism in Turkey in instantly found its supporters in the virtual world terms of the fact that the online action was dominated by social media platforms. People took to implemented in an offline environment. the streets and formed large masses due to social media. Due to the fact that the mainstream media OCCUPY GEZI did not include this event, activists followed the Gezi Park movement began in Taksim, İstanbul at information flow on computers and even on mobile the end of May in 2013 and then became a global phones, not from the mainstream media such as movement by spreading all around the world. On radio and television. Therefore, mainstream media May 27, 2013, while constructional works were was protested by the activists. In the first phase, performed for the pedestrianization project which images of violence executed by the police to the was approved by Municipal Council on Taksim activists spreaded around the country and world via Square, a portion of Gezi Park's wall was destroyed, Facebook, Twitter and Youtube. When analyzed the and in addition, these trees were removed under the numerical data of Gezi Park resistance via Facebook scope of implementing Taksim pedestrianization and Twitter in general, 7,920,511 messages were project.
Recommended publications
  • Cultural Production and Urban Locality in the Fields of Jazz and Fashion Design: the Case of Kuledibi, Istanbul
    CULTURAL PRODUCTION AND URBAN LOCALITY IN THE FIELDS OF JAZZ AND FASHION DESIGN: THE CASE OF KULEDİBİ, İSTANBUL A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF THE MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY ALTAN İLKUÇAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2013 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof.Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Ayşe Saktanber Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Helga Rittersberger-Tılıç Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assist. Prof. Dr. Eminegül Karababa (METU-MAN) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Helga Rittersberger-Tılıç (METU-SOC) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tahire Erman (BİLKENT-POLS) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sibel Kalaycıoğlu (METU-SOC) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Erdoğan Yıldırım (METU-SOC) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Altan İlkuçan Signature : iii ABSTRACT CULTURAL PRODUCTION AND URBAN LOCALITY IN THE FIELDS OF JAZZ AND FASHION DESIGN: THE CASE OF KULEDİBİ, İSTANBUL İlkuçan, Altan Ph.D., Department of Sociology Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Helga Rittersberger-Tılıç September 2013, 230 pages This study aims to analyze the relationship between cultural producers in Istanbul and the wider processes of neoliberal urban restructuring that takes in their surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • Galata and Pera 1 a Short History, Urban Development Architecture and Today
    ARI The Bulletin of the İstanbul Technical University VOLUME 55, NUMBER 1 Galata and Pera 1 A Short History, Urban Development Architecture and Today Afife Batur Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul Technical University, Taşkışla, 34437, Taksim, Istanbul, Turkey Keywords: Galata, Pera, Urban development, Architectural development The coastal band stretching from the to be more prominent starting from 10th northern shores of the Golden Horn until century onwards. The conditions that had Tophane and the slopes behing it have been created the Medieval Galata were being known as Galata since the 8th century. formed in these trading colonies. At first Formerly this area was known as Sycae Amalfi, then the Venetians and later the (Sykai), or as peran en Sykais, which Pisans had obtained special privileges from essentially means ‘on opposite shore’. the Byzantines. The Genovese, who had It is thought that Galata’s foundation established themselves on the southern preceded that of Constantinopolis. The shores of the Golden Horn as a result of archaeological finds here indicate that it their rights recognized by Emperor Manuel was an important settlement area in Comnenos I (1143-1186), were forced to Antiquity. Although its borders can not be move over to Pera on the opposite shore determined precisely, it is known that when the Venetians seized their territory during the reign of Emperor Constantin during the Latin invasion of 1204. (324 –337), it was a fortified settlement When the Latins departed from consisting of a forum, a theatre, a church, a Constantinople in 1261, the city was in harbor and bath buildings, as well as 431 complete ruins.
    [Show full text]
  • Advocacy Planning in Urban Renewal: Sulukule Platform As the First Advocacy Planning Experience of Turkey
    Advocacy Planning in Urban Renewal: Sulukule Platform As the First Advocacy Planning Experience of Turkey A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Community Planning of the College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning by Albeniz Tugce Ezme Bachelor of City and Regional Planning Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul, Turkey January 2009 Committee Chair: Dr. David Varady Submitted February 19, 2014 Abstract Sulukule was one of the most famous neighborhoods in Istanbul because of the Romani culture and historic identity. In 2006, the Fatih Municipality knocked on the residents’ doors with an urban renovation project. The community really did not know how they could retain their residence in the neighborhood; unfortunately everybody knew that they would not prosper in another place without their community connections. They were poor and had many issues impeding their livelihoods, but there should have been another solution that did not involve eviction. People, associations, different volunteer groups, universities in Istanbul, and also some trade associations were supporting the people of Sulukule. The Sulukule Platform was founded as this predicament began and fought against government eviction for years. In 2009, the area was totally destroyed, although the community did everything possible to save their neighborhood through the support of the Sulukule Platform. I cannot say that they lost everything in this process, but I also cannot say that anything was won. I can only say that the Fatih Municipality soiled its hands. No one will forget Sulukule, but everybody will remember the Fatih Municipality with this unsuccessful project.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Riot Zone: Why Taksim Square Matters to Turks by Susannah Cullinane , CNN June 7, 2013 -- Updated 1127 GMT (1927 HKT) CNN.Com
    http://edition.cnn.com/2013/06/07/world/europe/turkey-taksim-square-symbol/ Beyond the riot zone: Why Taksim Square matters to Turks By Susannah Cullinane , CNN June 7, 2013 -- Updated 1127 GMT (1927 HKT) CNN.com Taksim Square: Click on markers to explore the centerpoint of Istanbul's protests. (CNN) -- It's a congested, sprawling transport hub surrounded by 1950s architecture and predominantly used by commuters or tourists to cross the city of Istanbul. But proposed changes to Taksim Square have seen it become the flashpoint for protests that have swept through Turkey in the past week, leaving thousands injured and focusing the world's attention on the government of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Taksim has been no stranger to violence. In 1977, at least 34 protesters died during May Day clashes with police. May 1 rallies in the square were banned in 1980 and were only allowed to legally resume in 2010. On May Day this year, there were riots after city authorities again refused to grant trade unions and youth groups permission to demonstrate in Taksim, blaming construction work being carried out in the square. Professor Ersin Kalaycioglu, professor of political science at Istanbul's Sabanci University, said significantly, Taksim Square was also known as "republic square," because it was built by the Republic of Turkey's founding fathers to commemorate the war of liberation. "Taksim Square is connected to Istiklal Caddesi -- Independence Avenue -- and Cumhuriyet Caddesi -- the Avenue of the Republic. So there is a lot of symbolism that has to do with the Turkish Republic," he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Taksim Square As 'Heritage Site' and the 2013 Gezi Protests
    Whitehead C, Bozoğlu G. Protest, Bodies, and the Grounds of Memory: Taksim Square as 'heritage site' and the 2013 Gezi Protests. Heritage and Society (2017) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2017.1301084 Copyright: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Heritage and Society on 30/03/2017, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2017.1301084 Date deposited: 11/04/2017 Embargo release date: 30 September 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence Newcastle University ePrints - eprint.ncl.ac.uk This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Heritage and Society on 30/04/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2159032X.2017.1301084 Protest, Bodies and the Grounds of Memory: Taksim Square as ‘heritage site’ and the 2013 Gezi Protests Christopher Whitehead and Gönül Bozoğlu Media, Culture, Heritage, Newcastle University Place incarnates the experiences and aspirations of a people. Place is not only a fact to be explained in the broader frame of space, but it is also a reality to be clarified and understood from the perspectives of the people who have given it meaning. (Yi-Fu Tuan Space and Place, 1979: 387) The current protest movement isn’t about the past; it is about today and tomorrow. It started because a new generation wanted to defend Gezi Park, a public green space, against the violent, abusive manner in which the government sought to sacrifice it to the gods of neo-liberalism and neo- Ottomanism with a plan to build a replica of Ottoman barracks, a shopping mall and apartments (Edhem Eldem, ‘Turkey’s False Nostalgia’, New York Times, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Gezi Assemblages: Emergence As Embodiment in the Gezi Movement
    Gezi Assemblages: Emergence as Embodiment in the Gezi Movement INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY DOCTORAL PROGRAM UNIVERSITAT OBERTA DE CATALUNYA (UOC) Autor: Öznur Karakaş Research Group: CareNET Supervisor: Israel Rodriguez-Giralt (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya) BARCELONA December 21, 2017 1 TABLE OF MATTERS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ....................................................................................................... 5 ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 1 ....................................................................................................................... 25 The Gezi Movement: Emerging contentious communities in-the-making ...................... 25 1.1. How were Gezi communities made? Accounting for embodied emergence of new dissident communities ............................................................................................................ 30 1.2. Some methodological concerns: how to dwell on community-making..................... 42 1.3. Conceptualizing the communities-in-the-making: From network to assemblage ... 56 CHAPTER 2 ....................................................................................................................... 70 Action in Translation: The Action Repertoire of the Gezi Movement .............................. 70 2.1. Occupation
    [Show full text]
  • The Gezi Park– Taksim Demonstrations and Uses of Social Policy for Reimagining Turkey
    Hakan Seckinelgin Social policy and conflict: the Gezi Park– Taksim demonstrations and uses of social policy for reimagining Turkey Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Seckinelgin, Hakan (2015) Social policy and conflict: the Gezi Park–Taksim demonstrations and uses of social policy for reimagining Turkey. Third World Quarterly . pp. 1-17. ISSN 0143-6597 DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1089164 © 2015 Southseries Inc This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/65063/ Available in LSE Research Online: January 2016 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Social Policy and Conflict: Gezi Park-Taksim Demonstrations and Uses of Social Policy for Reimagining Turkey Hakan Seckinelgin, Department of Social Policy, LSE The article is interested in the ways in which social policy debates, both on particular policy ideas and on policy implementation, are instrumental in understanding socio-political conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Grapes of Wrath
    #6.13 PERSPECTIVES Political analysis and commentary from Turkey THE TRANSFORMATION OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AREAS IN TURKEY GRAPES OF WRATH DEMOCRACY FOREIGN POLICY HUMAN LANDSCAPES The Gezi Park Resistance Objective versus Process in Turkey’s Memet Aksoy: and the Peace Process EU Membership Bid This is What Being an Artist is: Nazan Üstündağ Erhan İçener Taking Sides Page 54 Page 62 Ayşegül Oğuz Page 66 TURKEY REPRESENTATION Contents From the editor 3 ■ Cover story: The transformation of agriculture and rural areas in Turkey The dynamics of agricultural and rural transformation in post-1980 Turkey Murat Öztürk 4 Europe’s rural policies a la carte: The right choice for Turkey? Gökhan Günaydın 11 The liberalization of Turkish agriculture and the dissolution of small peasantry Abdullah Aysu 14 Agriculture: Strategic documents and reality Ali Ekber Yıldırım 22 Land grabbing Sibel Çaşkurlu 26 A real life “Grapes of Wrath” Metin Özuğurlu 31 ■ Ecology Save the spirit of Belgrade Forest! Ünal Akkemik 35 Child poverty in Turkey: Access to education among children of seasonal workers Ayşe Gündüz Hoşgör 38 Urban contexts of the june days Şerafettin Can Atalay 42 ■ Democracy Is the Ergenekon case a step towards democracy? Orhan Gazi Ertekin 44 Participative democracy and active citizenship Ayhan Bilgen 48 Forcing the doors of perception open Melda Onur 51 The Gezi Park Resistance and the peace process Nazan Üstündağ 54 Marching like Zapatistas Sebahat Tuncel 58 ■ Foreign Policy Objective versus process: Dichotomy in Turkey’s EU membership bid Erhan İcener 62 ■ Culture Rural life in Turkish cinema: A location for innocence Ferit Karahan 64 ■ Human Landscapes from Turkey This is what being an artist is: Taking Sides Memet Aksoy 66 ■ News from HBSD 69 Heinrich Böll Stiftung - Turkey Represantation The Heinrich Böll Stiftung, associated with the German Green Party, is a legally autonomous and intellectually open political foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • BEST WESTERN PLUS the President Hotel Istanbul Address
    WSEAS CONFERENCE GUIDE Conference Location: BEST WESTERN PLUS The President Hotel Istanbul Address: Tiyatro Cd No. 25, Beyazit 34126, Istanbul, Turkey Tel: +90 212 516 69 80 Fax: +90 212 516 69 98 Email: [email protected] URL: http://thepresidenthotel.com/en/home.html How to get to Istanbul By Air: The easiest way to get in Istanbul is to travel by airplane. Turkish Airlines and many other world airlines have regular daily flights to Istanbul. There are also local airliners that run charter flights to Ataturk Airport Tel.: +90 212 463 3000 Istanbul especially during the summer months. There are two International Airports, Ataturk Airport URL: http://www.ataturkairport.com and Sabiha Gokcen Airport. Sabiha Gokcen International (SAW) Ataturk International Airport is located 20km west of the city center. Tel.: +90 216 588 88 88 Address: Istanbul Ataturk Airport International Terminal, 34149 Yesilkoy, Istanbul, Turkey URL: http://www.sabihagokcen.aero/ Sabiha Gokcen Airport is located on the Anatolian shore of Istanbul at Pendik / Kurtkoy, at a distance of 40 km to Kadikoy Address: Sabiha Gökçen Airport Terminal Building Pendik 34912 Istanbul, Turkey By Train: Turkish Railways (TCDD) has regular train schedules from/to Istanbul to Budapest, Bucarest, Kishinev, Thessaloniki, Sofia, Damascus and Tehran. International trains depurts/arrives at Sirkeci Station on the European side or Haydarpasa Station on the Asian side of Istanbul. By Bus: Some private Turkish companies run scheduled buses to Istanbul from Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France, Greece, Bulgaria, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iran, Jordan, Russia, Georgia, and Romania. You can consult your local travel agency in order to plan your trip.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the Gezi Park Protests Through the Lens of Media Süleyman Hakan Yılmaz, Yasemin Gülşen Yılmaz
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Vol:9, No:8, 2015 A Look at the Gezi Park Protests through the Lens of Media Süleyman Hakan Yılmaz, Yasemin Gülşen Yılmaz of Security’s data, there have been 4,900 protests relating to Abstract—The Gezi Park protests of 2013 have significantly Gezi Park in 80 provinces except in the provinces of Bayburt changed the Turkish agenda and its effects have been felt historically. and Bingöl, and during these protests 5.300 people were taken The protests, which rapidly spread throughout the country, were into custody, 160 of which were arrested [2]. triggered by the proposal to recreate the Ottoman Army Barracks to Participants come from a wide range of social backgrounds. function as a shopping mall on Gezi Park located in Istanbul’s Taksim neighbourhood despite the oppositions of several NGOs and They include, Alevis, anti-Capitalist Muslims, Revolutionist when trees were cut in the park for this purpose. Muslims, with the Beşiktaş fan-lub ÇARŞI in the lead, Once the news that the construction vehicles entered the park on supporters of Fenerbahçe and Galatasaray football teams, May 27 spread on social media, activists moved into the park to stop feminist organizations, Kemalist-Nationalist groups, Kurds, the demolition, against whom the police used disproportioned force. LGBT's, unions, socialist parties and idealist groups, besides With this police intervention and the then prime-minister Tayyip Taksim Dayanışma (Taksim support group) as an uniting Erdoğan's insistent statements about the construction plans, the protests turned into anti- government demonstrations, which then organization [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Humour As Resistance a Brief Analysis of the Gezi Park Protest
    PROTEST AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS 2 PROTEST AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS David and Toktamış (eds.) In May and June of 2013, an encampment protesting against the privatisation of an historic public space in a commercially vibrant square of Istanbul began as a typical urban social movement for individual rights and freedoms, with no particular political affiliation. Thanks to the brutality of the police and the Turkish Prime Minister’s reactions, the mobilisation soon snowballed into mass opposition to the regime. This volume puts together an excellent collection of field research, qualitative and quantitative data, theoretical approaches and international comparative contributions in order to reveal the significance of the Gezi Protests in Turkish society and contemporary history. It uses a broad spectrum of disciplines, including Political Science, Anthropology, Sociology, Social Psychology, International Relations, and Political Economy. Isabel David is Assistant Professor at the School of Social and Political Sciences, Universidade de Lisboa (University of Lisbon) , Portugal. Her research focuses on Turkish politics, Turkey-EU relations and collective ‘Everywhere Taksim’ action. She is currently working on an article on AKP rule for the Journal of Contemporary European Studies. Kumru F. Toktamış, PhD, is an Adjunct Associate Professor at the Depart- ment of Social Sciences and Cultural Studies of Pratt Institute, Brooklyn, NY. Her research focuses on State Formation, Nationalism, Ethnicity and Collective Action. In 2014, she published a book chapter on ‘Tribes and Democratization/De-Democratization in Libya’. Edited by Isabel David and Kumru F. Toktamış ‘Everywhere Taksim’ Sowing the Seeds for a New Turkey at Gezi ISBN: 978-90-8964-807-5 AUP.nl 9 7 8 9 0 8 9 6 4 8 0 7 5 ‘Everywhere Taksim’ Protest and Social Movements Recent years have seen an explosion of protest movements around the world, and academic theories are racing to catch up with them.
    [Show full text]
  • Power of Public in Remaking the Space: Reflections from Istanbul's
    Power of Public in Remaking the Space: Reflections from Istanbul’s Gezi Zeynep Gunay, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey Sixth Asian Conference on Arts and Humanities Official Conference Proceedings 2015 Abstract The paper attempts to question the power of public in remaking the urban space through the reflections from Istanbul’s Gezi Park. Since the 1940s after its construction, Gezi Park and Taksim Square has appeared to be the symbol of republican and secular state, the symbol of the new society, the symbol of worker class, the symbol of tolerance and self-expression, the symbol of cultural production and consumption through an unending tension between the global and the local. Occupy Gezi Movement in May 2013, though, has made Gezi Park not only a symbol for state-driven authoritarian initiatives in the urban landscapes of Turkey, but also a role-model for inclusive urbanity based on community empowerment. Regarding this unique case study, the paper presents the use of power in the reproduction of space and the implications of the discovery of the power of space by highlighting the need for a transition from the old role of public space as a set format of the state towards rethinking the public space as the representation space of right to the city and empowerment in resolving the conflicts between different power relations engaged in the reproduction of urban space. Keywords: Public space, power, community empowerment, Istanbul, Gezi Park iafor The International Academic Forum www.iafor.org Introduction The public space is the legitimate platform to present power - the ability to make a difference in the world; thus the paper attempts to question the power of public in remaking the urban space through the reflections from Istanbul’s Gezi Park.
    [Show full text]