Pinisi Journal of Art, Humanity & Social Studies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pinisi Journal of Art, Humanity & Social Studies ISSN 2747-2671 (online) PINISI JOURNAL OF ART, HUMANITY & SOCIAL STUDIES Vol. 1 No. 3, 2021 Problem of God and the Absolute: The Radhakrishnan View Peter. O. O. Ottuh1, Onos Godwin Idjakpo 2 1 Department of Religious Studies and Philosophy, Delta State University, Abraka, Delta State, Nigeria. 2 Department of Religious Studies and Philosophy, Delta State University, Abraka, Delta State, Nigeria. * [email protected] Abstract The problem of Ultimate Reality is one of the most important problems in the history of philosophy. In the enquiry into the nature of Ultimate Reality philosophers are also advocating a kind of dualism signifying two ultimate principles irreducible to each other, namely God and the Absolute. Since, the Absolute is the Ultimate Reality from the metaphysical standpoint and from the religious stand point God is regarded as the Supreme Reality, a question generally arises whether we identify the God of religion with the Absolute of metaphysics or we maintain a distinction between them. Although various solutions have been offered by different philosophers at different times, it was mainly Radhakrishnan, who has been credited as being the great reconciler of the problem of the relation between God and the Absolute. Hence in this present work an attempt has been made to highlight the solution offered by Radhakrishnan in this connection. Keywords: Ultimate Reality; Radhakrishnan; The problem of God. 1. INTRODUCTION will. Spinoza, the first great absolutist thinker of Hastings Rashdall (1912) states that the modern Europe holds that God is identical with the Absolute is not God alone, but God and all other Absolute (Connelly 2015). Again he says that God spirits forming with Him a system or unity. He is identical with the Infinite Substance which is the makes a distinction between God and the Absolute one and the only reality. Hegel identifies the and takes God in the ordinary sense of a finite ii Absolute of his philosophy with the God of personal being. According to Rashdall, the religion. According to Hegel the only difference Absolute cannot be identified with God. The between the Absolute and God is that the former is ground on the basis of which Rashdall draws a the Ultimate Reality interpreted in terms of pure distinction between God and the Absolute is that, thought, whereas the latter is the same reality while God is to be regarded as a self conscious represented pictorially i.e. in terms of imagination unity of selves or spirits, the Absolute is the unity and emotion (Gabriel 2016). Bradley (1985) draws a of God and the selves, but that unity is not the mere distinction between God and the Absolute and unity of self-conscious spirit. Besides this logical admits that the idea of God tends to pass into that ground there is a religious demand which also of the Absolute. For Bradley the Absolute is not compels man to make such distinction between God and that God has no meaning outside of the God and the Absolute. The problem of Ultimate religious consciousness and is essentially practical. Reality is a very vexed problem in the history of The Absolute for him cannot be God, because in the philosophy both Indian and Western. Although it end the Absolute is related to nothing and there is a very old problem it has not lost its novelty cannot be a practical relation between it and finite considering the ever new theories springing up 26 Pinisi Journal of Art, Humanity and Social Studies everyday. The Brahmasutra of Śaṅkara starts with conveniently define the Absolute as that structure the proposal of the enquiry after Ultimate Reality of the world system which any and every internally and this proves the importance of this problem in consistent purpose must recognize as the condition philosophy and particularly in the Vedānta system of its own fulfillment. So deny the existence of an (Sharma 1992). In the enquiry into the nature of Absolute thus defined, is in principle to reduce the Ultimate Reality philosophers are also advocating a world and life to a mere chaos” (Taylor 2018, p. 53). kind of dualism signifying two ultimate principles, An Absolute is the sort of entity which not irreducible to each other. The problem of God and only occupies a prime ontic category, but also the Absolute is one of the fundamental problems in occupies necessarily and unconditionally. An the philosophy of East and West. Absolute is such that it admits of no alternatives. If Generally God is regarded as the highest there is an Absolute of that essential sort, then it is principle of the theological interpretation of the meaningless to support that there might instead universe (Asadu & Nzuanke 2014, pp. 129-130), have been an Absolute of some other some what whereas the Absolute is the Ultimate Reality from different nature or essence (Duke 2016; Duke 2018; the metaphysical stand point. God is personal and Duke & John 2019; Duke 2020). When we make the Absolute is above personality (Ekpenyong & enquiry with our imperfect insight into modality, Okoi 2018). There is a basic unanimity among the we find that there are alternative Absolutes, but theologions that God is a personal being with our perfect insight into modality all such responding to our prayers and similar unanimity alternatively would vanish. The Absolute may be exists among Absolutists that the Absolute is an articulated into a number of members, each of impersonal Reality. But both God and the Absolute which requires and so includes all the others. An cannot be regarded to be equally real and ultimate Absolute must be taken as containing within itself at the same time. Therefore it has given rise to the the source of the Absoluteness claiming realm of serious problem of God and the Absolute. There values; it must be such as to embody all such are various philosophers who have discussed the values and to explain their detailed content. And if problem. The most impressive solution to the the Absoluteness and the claim of values can be problem of the relation between God and the shown to rest confusion, then there are and can be Absolute was offered by Radhakrishnan. In this no Absolutes. work we shall make a study of the Again, the Absolute may be conceived as a Radhakrishnan’s solution to this problem along concrete individuality, which is at the same time a with the views of some modern philosophers. concrete universal encouraging reality of all that experienced, of matter, life and spirit in their 2. CONCEPT OF THE ABSOLUTE relations and inter relations. It allows no gap Absolute is that which is not in any respect among these different elements, each of which is subject to conditions or limited; the first being directed towards the realization of values that are which is independent, subsistent, possessing embodied in the Absolute. Matter, life and Spirit within itself the reason for its existence and its are thus no appearances, but are different levels of qualifications, the fullness of being, the fullness of self-expression in the life of the Absolute. Another perfection (Victor 1992). The term Absolute is used feature which distinguishes this conception of the by the philosophers to signify the Ultimate Reality Absolute is that on it the individual selves instead regarded as one and yet as the source of variety; as of being appearances have been given a scope for complete or perfect and yet as not divorced from approximation to the unity and totality of Absolute the finite, imperfect world. The idea of the values. In this approximation lies the progressive Absolute is generally associated with a personality of the individual self which grows out transcendent Being divested of all concrete contexts of an antagonism between the self and the world and beyond all categorical determinations, setting up his rights and duties. The antagonism principally spatial, temporal and causal. Such a between the self of man and his not self pursues transcendent Being is an abstract universal, him and he is in the struggle so long as the ideals unchanging and unchangeable, not an object of or values he will be striving after will be held out to thought or discursive reason, but one of unique him as so many external goals. This happens so experience or intuition. “We may, in fact, long as he regards himself as a self centred moral 27 Pinisi Journal of Art, Humanity and Social Studies person. The inward realization of the presence of philosophy, the Absolute was understood as the the ideal by man within himself may be said to primordial and fundamental, the basic factor of the constitute the true significance of Divine cosmos. In ancient philosophy the problem of Immanence of the sphere of religion. In religion Absolute was posed by Thales of Miletus (Whitrow therefore the horizon of human ideals is so 1940). According to him, the Absolute principle or widened as to merge into the wider sphere of the cause of all reality is water. For Aristotle the objective values and perfection which are Absolute was being in the absolute sense, the most embodied in the being of God. In religion perfect Substance. The Absolute is identified with antagonism between the individual self and the unity and good, the intellect, the self-thinking Absolute reaches the vanishing point though such thought. In modern philosophy, according to a state does not mean annihilation but rather Descartes the Absolute is an infinite and perfect enrichment of the individual self in the Absolute. being whose essence is to be the cause of itself. The Religion thus conceived leaves a very thin line of Absolute is the cause of the idea of the Infinite distinction between God and the Absolute.
Recommended publications
  • What the Upanisads Teach
    What the Upanisads Teach by Suhotra Swami Part One The Muktikopanisad lists the names of 108 Upanisads (see Cd Adi 7. 108p). Of these, Srila Prabhupada states that 11 are considered to be the topmost: Isa, Kena, Katha, Prasna, Mundaka, Mandukya, Taittiriya, Aitareya, Chandogya, Brhadaranyaka and Svetasvatara . For the first 10 of these 11, Sankaracarya and Madhvacarya wrote commentaries. Besides these commentaries, in their bhasyas on Vedanta-sutra they have cited passages from Svetasvatara Upanisad , as well as Subala, Kausitaki and Mahanarayana Upanisads. Ramanujacarya commented on the important passages of 9 of the first 10 Upanisads. Because the first 10 received special attention from the 3 great bhasyakaras , they are called Dasopanisad . Along with the 11 listed as topmost by Srila Prabhupada, 3 which Sankara and Madhva quoted in their sutra-bhasyas -- Subala, Kausitaki and Mahanarayana Upanisads --are considered more important than the remaining 97 Upanisads. That is because these 14 Upanisads are directly referred to by Srila Vyasadeva himself in Vedanta-sutra . Thus the 14 Upanisads of Vedanta are: Isa, Kena, Katha, Prasna, Mundaka, Mandukya, Aitareya, Taittiriya, Brhadaranyaka, Chandogya, Svetasvatara, Kausitaki, Subala and Mahanarayana. These 14 belong to various portions of the 4 Vedas-- Rg, Yajus, Sama and Atharva. Of the 14, 8 ( Brhadaranyaka, Chandogya, Taittrirya, Mundaka, Katha, Aitareya, Prasna and Svetasvatara ) are employed by Vyasa in sutras that are considered especially important. In the Gaudiya Vaisnava sampradaya , Srila Baladeva Vidyabhusana shines as an acarya of vedanta-darsana. Other great Gaudiya acaryas were not met with the need to demonstrate the link between Mahaprabhu's siksa and the Upanisads and Vedanta-sutra.
    [Show full text]
  • Dvaita Vedanta
    Dvaita Vedanta Madhva’s Vaisnava Theism K R Paramahamsa Table of Contents Dvaita System Of Vedanta ................................................ 1 Cognition ............................................................................ 5 Introduction..................................................................... 5 Pratyaksa, Sense Perception .......................................... 6 Anumana, Inference ....................................................... 9 Sabda, Word Testimony ............................................... 10 Metaphysical Categories ................................................ 13 General ........................................................................ 13 Nature .......................................................................... 14 Individual Soul (Jiva) ..................................................... 17 God .............................................................................. 21 Purusartha, Human Goal ................................................ 30 Purusartha .................................................................... 30 Sadhana, Means of Attainment ..................................... 32 Evolution of Dvaita Thought .......................................... 37 Madhva Hagiology .......................................................... 42 Works of Madhva-Sarvamula ......................................... 44 An Outline .................................................................... 44 Gitabhashya ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Unit 1 Introduction to the Upanishads
    UNIT 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE UPANISHADS Contents 1.0 Objectives 1.1 Introduction 1.2 The Brahmanas Vs. the Upanishads – clash of classes? 1.3 Meaning of the Upanishads. 1.4 The form 1.5 Heterogeneity in thought. 1.6 Farewell to the vedic gods. 1.7 Unity in diversity. 1.8 The irrelevance of Bhakti. 1.9 The Analysis of mind. 1.10 Moksha and knowledge or realization 1.11 Let Us Sum Up 1.12 Key Words 1.13 Further Readings and References 1.14 Answers to Check Your Progress 1.0 OBJECTIVES In this unit: you will become familiar with the general tenor of the Upanishads you are expected to recognize the differences between the Vedas and the Upanishads, not only in content but also in spirit you should be able to notice various philosophical and primitive scientific issues, which have found place in the Upanishads you should be in a position to understand that philosophy is not merely an intellectual exercise in India, but also a guiding factor in human life 1.1 INTRODUCTION The Upanishads mark the concluding parts of the Vedic literature. In two different senses the Upanishads are called ‘Vedanta’. The first statement is one meaning. Vedanta also means the culmination of the Vedic thought. In our study of Unit, we learnt that the Vedic thought began with the age of Mantras and in the course of evolution it passed through two more stages; the 1 Brahmanas and the Aranyakas. While the text and the spirit of the Brahmanas did not really make any advance over the age of Mantras, the subsequent stage, i.e., the Aranyakas applied corrective measure.
    [Show full text]
  • Plagiarism Checker X Originality Report Similarity Found: 7%
    Plagiarism Checker X Originality Report Similarity Found: 7% Date: Sunday, April 26, 2020 Statistics: 4606 words Plagiarized / 65308 Total words Remarks: Low Plagiarism Detected - Your Document needs Optional Improvement. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VEDANTA & METODE PEMAHAMAN FILSAFAT HINDU Sanksi Pelanggaran Pasal 72 Undang-undang No. 19 Tahun 2002 tentang Hak Cipta (1) Barangsiapa dengan sengaja dan tanpa hak melakukan perbuatan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) atau Pasal 49 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) dipidana dengan pidana penjara masing-masing paling singkat 1 (satu) bulan dan/atau denda paling sedikit Rp 1.000.000,00 (satu juta rupiah), atau pidana penjara paling lama 7 (tujuh) tahun dan/atau denda paling banyak Rp 5.000.000.000,00 (lima miliar rupiah). (2) Barangsiapa dengan sengaja menyiarkan, memamerkan, mengedarkan, atau menjual kepada umum suatu Ciptaan atau barang hasil pelanggaran Hak Cipta atau Hak Terkait sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) dipidana dengan pidana penjara paling lama 5 (lima) tahun dan/atau denda paling banyak Rp 500.000.000,00 (lima ratus juta rupiah). Penerbit PÀRAMITA Surabaya VEDANTA & METODE PEMAHAMAN FILSAFAT HINDU Oleh: Ni Kadek Surpi Aryadharma Katalog Dalam Terbitan (KDT) Surabaya: Pàramita, 2019 xvi+288 hal ; 155 mm x 235 mm ISBN: 978-602-204-699-8 Penerbit & Percetakan : “PÀRAMITA” Email: info@penerbitparamita. com http://www. penerbitparamita. com Jl. Menanggal III No. 32Telp. (031) 8295555, 8295500 Surabaya 60234 Fax : (031) 8295555 Pemasaran “PÀRAMITA” Jl. Letda Made Putra 16BTelp. (0361) 226445, 8424209 DenpasarFax : (0361) 226445 Cetakan 2019 Penerjemah : Ni Kadek Surpi Aryadharma Layout : Agung Surya Cover : Hasan VEDANTA & METODE PEMAHAMAN FILSAFAT HINDU VEDANTA & METODE PEMAHAMAN FILSAFAT HINDU v KEMENTERIAN AGAMA REPUBLIK INDONESIA DIREKTORAT JENDERAL BIMBINGAN MASYARAKAT HINDU Jln.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is Gangaji & What Is She Doing?
    Who is Gangaji & What is She Doing? Unraveling Gangaji’s Home Page Introduction “Can Anyone Please Clearly State What Gangaji is doing?” What follows is an analysis of what a reader will find when they go to the Home Page for Gangaji’s Web Site at: http://www.gangaji.org/ Gangaji’s Introduction to Web Readers are in Envy Green Arial Bold, 10pt. Reasonable questions that an average responsible person might ask have been added in 8pt , Times New Roman Font. All supporting quotes are included in Times New Roman blue italic with focus portions highlighted in Bold Burnt Red. -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*- Itemized Breakdown of what Gangaji says on her Home Page “There is a great secret that beings throughout time have announced, the secret of an extraordinary treasure, the treasure of the nectar of eternal life.” Gangaji does not say whom she is alluding to. We are left to assume that she is referring to great spiritual luminaries like Lord Brahma, Narada Muni, Veda Vyasa, Lord Ramachandra, Lord Krishna, Confucius, Zarathustra, Lord Buddha, Lord Jesus, Saint Thomas Aquinas, Muhammad, Lord Caitanya etc. “It is the nectar of pure beingness, recognizing itself as consciousness and overflowing in the love of that recognition.” Some of the teachings of Confucius and Lord Buddha might be able to get stretched far enough to support this statement, but those who have actually studied what the greatest sages in history taught know that they would not appreciate the vague, elusive and misleading direction Gangaji’s second sentence is heading. “If you imagine yourself to be located in a body, then you will move that body from place to place, searching for this treasure of nectar.” Here Gangaji is either exposing her ignorance or her inability to communicate clearly.
    [Show full text]
  • Ii : Philosophy K-3617 ±Üâ.£.®Æãà./P.T.O
    Test Paper : II Test Booklet Serial No. : _______________________ Test Subject : PHILOSOPHY OMR Sheet No. : _________________________________ Test Subject Code : K-3617 Roll No. (Figures as per admission card) Name & Signature of Invigilator/s Signature : _________________________________ Name : _________________________________ Paper : II Subject : PHILOSOPHY Time : 1 Hour 15 Minutes Maximum Marks : 100 Number of Pages in this Booklet : 16 Number of Questions in this Booklet : 50 A»Ü¦ìWÜÚWæ ÓÜãaÜ®æWÜÙÜá Instructions for the Candidates 1. D ±âo¨Ü Ü ÊáàÆᤩ¿áÈÉæ J¨XÔ¨Ü Ü Ó§ÙÜ ¨Ü ÈÉÜ ¯ÊáÜ ¾ ÃãàÇ æ ®íÃÜ ®Ü áÜ ° ÃÀáÄ.æ 1. Write your roll number in the space provided on the top of this page. 2. D ±Ü£ÅPæ¿áá ÖÜá BÁáR Ë«Ü¨Ü IÊÜñÜᤠ±ÜÅÍæ°WÜÙÜ®Üá° JÙÜWæãíw¨æ. 2. This paper consists of fifty multiple-choice type of questions. 3. ±ÄàPÜ Ò¿áæ ±ÝÅÃí»Ü ¨Ü ÈÉÜ , ±ÅÍÜ °æ±âÔ¤PÜ ¿á®æ áÜ ° ¯ÊáWÜ æ¯àvÇÝWÜ áÊÜ â¨Ü á.Ü Êã¨æ ÆÜ 5 ¯ËáÐWÜ ÙÜ ÈÉÜ 3. At the commencement of examination, the question booklet will ¯àÊâÜ ±âÔ¤PÜ ¿á®æ áÜ ° ñÃæ ¿áÆáæ ÊáñÜ á¤Ü PÙæ X®Ü íñÜ æPvÝÜ ¿áÊÝXx ±ÄàQÒÓÜ ÆáÜ PãàÃæ ÇÝX¨Ü .æ be given to you. In the first 5 minutes, you are requested to open the booklet and compulsorily examine it as below : (i) ±ÅÍÜ °æ ±âÔ¤PÜ Wæ æ ±ÅÊÜ àÍÝÊæ PÝÍÜ Ü ±vÜ ¿áÆá,æ D Öã©Pæ æ ±âo¨Ü Ü Aíb® Ü ÊáàÈÃæ áÊÜ Ü ±æà±Üà ÔàÆ®Üá° ÖÜÄÀáÄ. ÔrPÜRà ÔàÇ CÆÉ¨Ü A¥ÜÊÝ ñæÃæ¨Ü ±ÜâÔ¤Pæ¿á®Üá° (i) To have access to the Question Booklet, tear off the paper seal on the edge of the cover page.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 4 Brief History of Indian Metaphysics
    Introduction to Metaphysics UNIT 4 BRIEF HISTORY OF INDIAN METAPHYSICS Contents 4.0 Objectives 4.1 Introduction 4.2 The Vedas 4.3 The Upanisads 4.4 The Bhagavad Gita 4.5 Metaphysical Systems 4.6 Vedanta 4.7 Buddhism 4.8 Jainism 4.9 Saivism 4.10 Sikhism: Guru Nanak 4.11 Contemporary Indian Metaphysics 4.12 Let Us Sum Up 4.13 Further Readings and References 4.0 OBJECTIVES The present unit is oriented to: • Provide an overview of the main metaphysical trends in India • Provide the students with an opportunity to appreciate the metaphysical heritage of India 4.1 INTRODUCTION Indian metaphysics has developed over more than three thousand years. It is a plurality of the ways of understanding Being, from a rich source of ideas reflected in the Vedas, the Upanishads, and particularly in the classical systems of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. Metaphysics becomes explicit at various levels and in different contexts; in debates on soul, God, substances, universals, time, change, permanence/impermanence, one and many, etc. 4.2 THE VEDAS The Vedas are seen as the fertile ground of Indian metaphysics. The Vedic seers did not stop with a mythological view of Reality. They did not rest content until they had a vision of the unlimited Being (Tadekam). The hymn where the unlimited Being appears is the Nasadiya-sukta, which has been praised as containing ‘the flower of Indian thought.’ This hymn is the quintessence of Indian metaphysics. All things are traced to one principle. Opposites like being and non-being, life and death, night and day, are shown to be the self-unfolding of ‘That One.’ 40 Tadekam is the ground of the universe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosophy of the Upanisads
    The Philosophy Of The Upanisads K.R.Paramahamsa. 1 2 Table of Contents Page No Preface 9 1. The Background of Upanisadic Speculation 11 The Significance of the Study of the Upanisads 11 The Upanisads and the Rigveda 13 The Upanisads and the Atharvaveda 14 The Upanisads and the Brahmanas 15 Meaning of Revelation 17 2. Chronology of the Upanisads – Their Basic Content 19 Meaning of the Word Upanisad 19 Early and Later Upanisads 20 Main contents of the Upanisads 21 The Brhadaaranyaka Upanisad The Chhaandogya Upanisad The Isa Upanisad The Kena Upanisad The Aitareya Upanisad The Taittiriya Upanisad The Kaushitaki Upanisad The Katha Upanisad The Mundaka Upanisad The Svetaasvatara Upanisad The Prasna Upanisad The Maitri Upanisad The Maandukya Upanisad The Problems of the Upanisadic Philosophy 35 3. The Methods of the Upanisadic Philosophy 36 The Enigmatic Method 36 The Aphoristic Method 37 The Etymological Method 38 The Mythical Method 39 The Analogical Method 40 The Dialectic Method 41 The Synthetic Method 42 The Mono-logic Method 43 The Ad-hoc Method 44 The Regressive Method 45 The Poetry of the Upanisads 46 4. The Philosophers of the Upanisads and their Temporal Environment 48 3 The Mystical Philosophers 48 The Cosmological Philosophers 50 The Psychological Philosophers 51 The Metaphysical Philosophers 53 Saandilya Dadhyach Sanatkumaara Aaruni Yaajnavalkya Social Conditions of the Upanisadic Philosophers 58 Caste System Asrama System Position of Women The Relation of the Brahmins and Kshatriyas 5. The Development of Upanisadic Cosmogony 61
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 3 Chandogya
    UNIT 3 CHANDOGYA Contents 3.0 Objectives 3.1 Introduction 3.2 The ways of knowing Brahman 3.3 The philosophical implications of Tajjalaniti 3.4 The potential nature of the universe 3.5 Return to the nature of Brahman 3.6 Uddaalaka’s refutation of the Vedic suktas; his Cosmology 3.7 The Meaning of „Swapti’ and its relation to dream state 3.8 The bonds of Sat 3.9 Atman and the source of the universe, i.e., Brahman 3.10 The Supreme Knowledge (bhooma vidya) 3.11 Let Us Sum Up 3.12 Key Words 3.13 Further Readings and References 3.14 Answers to Check Your Progress 3.0 OBJECTIVES In this unit you will get to know in detail: the philosophical significance of the Chandogyopanishad a lot of discussion on liturgical aspects the establishing of the identity of Brahman and Atman the Upanishad as the earliest work on cosmology and the evolution of life. this work as the first ever attempt to introduce quantitative analysis in addition to qualitative analysis the nature of Atman in several ways as presented by this Upanishad. 3.1 INTRODUCTION This Upanishad belongs to Taandya Brahmana of the Samaveda. It consists of eight chapters with each chapter divided into several sections. First five chapters, excluding fourteenth section 1 of the third chapter which includes Shandilya Vidya are devoted to the superiority and effects of various forms of „Upasanas’ and „Homas’. Upasanas and Homas constitute rituals. The prominence enjoyed by these forms of rituals clearly indicate that (sections numbering around one hundred and ten are devoted to the description of these forms) the chapters and sections dealing with this aspect must have been appended to the Upanishad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosophy of the Upanishads. by Paul Deussen
    490 NOTICES OF BOOKS. the Vedic Indians saw Indra, you must go to the SarasvatI country south of Ambala. So with individual hymns. Dr. Arnold holds that the Vimada hymns, X, 20—26, belong to the very oldest in the Rgveda, and that e.g. X, 20 is much older than I, 1. We confess that we prefer the ordinary view that the Vimada hymns, instead of being early, are badly written and late imitations in elaborate metres much beyond the powers of the poet. The first line of X, 20, 2, which is unmetrical (agnim lie bhujam ydvistham), is surely deliberately put at the head of the collection (for v. 1 is merely a fragment of a refrain) in imitation of the famous agnim lie of I, 1, 1, and shows that the Vimada hymns are later than even that not very early hymn and the collection associated with it. What may be marks of antiquity may equally well in some cases, as in this, be signs of the incompetence of the poet. The doubts we feel about Dr. Arnold's results apply mainly to his treatment of the first four of the periods into which he divides the hymns, and he has rendered a valuable service by the careful examination and determination of the features characteristic of the ' popular' Rgveda. A. BERRIEDALE KEITH. THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE UPANISHADS'. By PAUL DEXJSSEN. Translated by Rev. A. S. GEDEN. (Edinburgh, 1906.) Mr. Geden has rendered a valuable service to students of Indian Philosophy by this translation of the second part of vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Upanishadic Approach to Reality
    THE UPANISHADIC APPROACH TO REALITY By SWAMI SATCHIDANANDENDRA SARASWATI ADHYATMA PRAKASHA KARYALAYA Holenarsipur - 573 211. (HASSAN DISTRICf, KARNATAKA,INDlA) 1997 Books You Ought To Read Salient Features of Sailkara's Vedanta Although many books are very popular probably because their authorship has been ascribed to the great Sankara, they contain tenets in conflict with one another and the various doctrines contained in the three groups of works collectively called the 'Prasthana Tray!', indisputably ascribed to Sailkara. As it is not easy for beginners to­ consolidate and discriminate for themselves the genuine Vedantic doctrines, an attempt is made by the Swamiji to solve this problem. Pages: 110 Intuition of Reality Another masterpiece from the pen of Shri Swiimi Satchida­ nandendra Saraswati, who has very ably illustrated as to how the Vedantic Knowledge is not mere subtle intellectualism, but it is an 'Intuition' of the Ultimate Reality arising through Divine Grace. The writer has inci­ dentally refuted the oft-repeated assertion that Sankara's philosophy is an out-and-out rationalistic system and that he has provided no place for Iswara in his Advaita Philosophy. Pages: 1115 Sailkara's Clarification of Certain Vedintic Concepts The Upanishads contain two sets of teaching regarding Brahman or Reality, addressed to two different levels of the mind. To the highest grade of the aspirants belongs the disciple who has attained the mental equipment necessary for entering upon the course of study, either in this birth or who possesses an introvert mind as a result of disciplines undergone in his previous lives - qualifying him to grasp the teaching imparted in the Sruti.
    [Show full text]
  • Brahma Sutras
    BRAHMA SUTRAS BRAHMA SUTRAS TEXT, WORD-TO-WORD MEANING, TRASLATION AND COMMENTARY BY Sri Swami Sivananda Published by THE DIVINE LIFE SOCIETY P.O. SHIVANANDANAGAR—249 192 Tehri-Garhwal, Uttarakhand, Himalayas, India Price ] 2008 [ Rs. 230/- First Edition: 1949 Second Edition: 1977 Third Edition: 1999 Fourth Edition: 2008 [ 1,000 Copies ] ©The Divine Life Trust Society ISBN 81-7052-151-3 ES22 Published by Swami Vimalananda for The Divine Life Society, Shivanandanagar, and printed by him at the Yoga Vedanta Forest Academy Press, P.O. Shivanandanagar, Distt. Tehri-Garhwal, Uttarakhand, Himalayas, India TO Sri Vyasa Bhagavan Sri Jagadguru Sankaracharya and Srimad Appayya Dikshitar SRI SWAMI SIVANANDA Born on the 8th Septem ber , 1887, in the illus trious family of Sage Appayya Dikshitar and several other renowned saints and sa vants, Sri Swami Sivananda had a natu ral flair for a life de voted to the study and prac tice of Vedanta. Added to this was an inborn eager ness to serve all and an in nate feeling of unity with all mankind. His pas sion for ser vice drew him to the medi cal ca reer; and soon he gravi tated to where he thought that his service was most needed. Malaya claimed him. He had earlier been ed it ing a health jour nal and wrote exten sively on health prob- lems. He discov ered that people needed right knowledge most of all; dis semi na tion of that knowledge he es poused as his own mission. It was divine dispen sa tion and the bless ing of God upon mankind that the doc tor of body and mind re nounced his ca reer and took to a life of renun ci ation to qualify for min is tering to the soul of man.
    [Show full text]