Port Snapshot 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

PORT OF ENTRY GEORGE BUSH INTERCONTINENTAL AIRPORT (IAH) Ports of entry within the state of Texas accounted for IAH’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE TEXAS nearly $740 BILLION in international trade in 2018. ECONOMY INCLUDE: TOTAL TRADE (2018) Texas has 29 OFFICIAL PORTS of entry that serve as critical gateways to global trade. Each port, whether an airport, land port or seaport, serves many domestic $14.1 BILLION and international economic activities across multiple DIRECT AND INDIRECT EMPLOYMENT industries. Each Texas port plays a distinctive role in the state’s transportation network and contributes to the state and local economies. 42,000 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT Glenn Hegar Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts $6.3 BILLION Sources: REMI, Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts GEORGE BUSH INTERCONTINENTAL AIRPORT: ABOUT THE GEORGE BUSH INTERCONTINENTAL AIRPORT ALL TRADE, 2003-2018 $20 69 $15 $10 GEORGE BUSH • INTERCONTINENTAL AIRPORT $5 45 IN BILLIONS $0 2005 2010 2015 Located north of Houston, IAH transports more Shipping activity through this airport than just travelers: cargo moves through the facility IAH accounted for $14.1 BILLION in trade in 2018, in impressive quantities. RANKS 19TH 96 percent more than in 2003 ($7.2 billion). NATIONALLY FOR IAH is part of the Houston-Galveston Customs District, TOTAL CARGO This airport’s trade, as a percentage of the which includes the Sugar Land Regional Airport, the TONNAGE AND NINTH FOR TOTAL FLIGHTS total through Texas cargo airports, has Port of Houston, the Port of Texas City, the Port of (ALL PLANES). fluctuated from as low as 19 percent in 2004 Galveston, the Port of Freeport, the Port of Port Lavaca to as high as 29.7 percent in 2011. and the Port of Corpus Christi. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, USA Trade Online HOUSTON PORTS OF HOUSTON, GEORGE BUSH INTERCONTINENTAL AIRPORT: TEXAS CITY AND TOTAL TRADE WITH TOP TRADING 10 GALVESTON PARTNERS, 2014-2018 IMPORTS EXPORTS $7 $6 $5 GEORGE BUSH INTERCONTINENTAL AIRPORT $4 $3 $2 TOP IMPORTS: MACHINERY, ELECTRONICS $1 IN BILLIONS $0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 TOP EXPORTS: MACHINERY, ELECTRONICS Germany, the Netherlands and China TOP TRADING GERMANY, THE NETHERLANDS, CHINA together accounted for about 29 percent of PARTNERS: the total trade through this airport in 2018, up from about 24 percent in 2014. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, USA Trade Online Glenn Hegar Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts GEORGE BUSH INTERCONTINENTAL AIRPORT IS ONE OF 29 OFFICIAL TEXAS PORTS OF ENTRY. See a select list, plus more in-depth regional data: comptroller.texas.gov/economy/economic-data/ports 96-1791-3 (8/19).

Copy Link

Recommended publications

DIRECT ECONOMIC EFFECTS of LACK of MAINTENANCE DREDGING of the HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL December 2010
DIRECT ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF LACK OF MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL December 2010 Prepared by CENTER FOR PORTS AND WATERWAYS TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE 701 NORTH POST OAK, SUITE 430 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77024‐3827 for PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. i CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND AND PROJECT APPROACH .................................................. 1 Phase 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Phase 2 ........................................................................................................................................ 6 CATEGORY 1: LIGHT LOADING ........................................................................................... 10 Selection and Data Acquisition ................................................................................................. 10 Valuation ................................................................................................................................... 13 CATEGORY 2: PARTIAL DISCHARGE AT WOODHOUSE TERMINAL ........................... 17 Selection and Data Acquisition ................................................................................................. 17 Valuation ................................................................................................................................... 17 CATEGORY
[Show full text]
Port of Houston Authority Tariff No. 14
Port of Houston Authority Tariff No. 14 February 1, 2021 Additional Rates, Rules, and Regulations Governing the Fentress Bracewell Barbours Cut Container Terminal EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 111 East Loop North - Houston, Texas 77029 USA P. O. Box 2562 - Houston, Texas 77252-2562 Phone (713) 670-2400 - Fax (713) 670-2564 Barbours Cut Container Terminal 1515 East Barbours Cut Boulevard – La Porte, Texas 77571 Phone (281) 470-1800 - Fax (281) 470-5580 PORT OF HOUSTON TARIFF NO. 14 Page No. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE: DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS SUBJECT SUBRULE PAGE NO. Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... 048 ......................................... 11 Agent or Vessel Agent ............................................................................................. 001 .......................................... 6 Baplie ....................................................................................................................... 002 ........................................... 6 Berth ......................................................................................................................... 003 ........................................... 6 Bonded Storage ....................................................................................................... 004 ........................................... 6 Checking .................................................................................................................. 005
[Show full text]
Port Services
Port Services LJA Engineering 713.953.5200 Houston Dallas LJA.com Alice Deer Park Arlington East Houston Austin Galveston Beaumont Katy Cedar Park San Antonio College Station Spring Conroe The Woodlands Corpus Christi Jacksonville, FL Port Services Projects • GT Logistics Crude Oil Terminal, LJA Engineering is a multi-discipline consulting engineering Port Arthur, Texas firm serving both local and international private and public • New Liquids Terminal Dock, sectors for over 45 years, with a specialty focus on offering Port of Texas City, Texas efficient solutions in midstream infrastructure design. Our understanding of integrated transportation and storage • Port Arthur Valero Refinery Joint operations, experience in terminal development for marine, Outfall Canal Access Bridge, Jefferson County, Texas rail, and truck terminals, and knowledge of pipeline facilities set us apart. • Dock Inspection Program for Port of Texas City, Texas City, From capacity improvements to greenfield design, Texas LJA provides comprehensive engineering services • Lynchburg Ferry Hurricane for port and terminal capital projects. Harvey Emergency Repair, LJA’s staff of over 700 professionals thrives on challenging Harris County - Precinct 2, Texas projects and designing new solutions for our clients. • Sabine Pass Port Authority Our engineers are well versed in designing port projects, About Us Port Expertise Resources L-Dock, Sabine Pass, Texas meter and pigging stations, terminal piping, pipe racks, LJA is a full service consulting We offer multi-disciplinary
[Show full text]
Project Overview
CREATING NEW MARKETS FOR CLEAN ENERGY Project Overview July 2020 Introduction PILOT LNG IS AN ENERGY PILOT LNG IS WORKING WITH SOLUTIONS COMPANY, THE PORT OF GALVESTON ON FOCUSED ON THE DELIVERY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS (LNG) LNG BUNKER TERMINAL THAT TO BOTH NEW AND EXISTING WILL BE LOCATED ON MARKETS BY DEVELOPING AND PELICAN ISLAND. THE LNG OPERATING LNG IMPORT AND BUNKER FUEL WILL SERVE THE LNG FUEL/BUNKERING GREATER GALVESTON / TERMINALS AND RELATED HOUSTON PORT COMPLEX BY INFRASTRUCTURE. THE SUPPLYING CLEAN BURNING COMPANY AIMS TO ESTABLISH LNG TO THE RAPIDLY LNG TERMINAL AND LOGISTICS EXPANDING FLEET OF LNG- OPPORTUNITIES WORLDWIDE FUELED VESSELS. TO MEET GROWING NATURAL GAS DEMAND. 1 Why LNG as a Marine Fuel? • New international regulations effective January 01, 2020 require the shipping industry to burn fuels with <0.5% Sulphur (SOx) globally • In certain regions (US, Europe), the regulations are more stringent <0.1% • LNG has much lower emissions than conventional marine fuels • LNG emits zero SOx • LNG has virtually no particulate matter • LNG emits 90% less NOx vs. conventional HFO • LNG as a marine fuel is less costly when compared to low Sulphur fuel oil Pilot LNG Source: DNV-GL 2020 2 LNG as a Marine Fuel: Emissions • LNG has a much better emissions performance than conventional fuels and solutions. • LNG emits zero Sox, and very low particulate matter. • Compared to existing heavy marine fuel oils, LNG can, depending on the technology used, emit 80% to 90% fewer NOx emissions. • Utilizing best practices and appropriate technologies to minimize methane leakage, realistic reductions of GHG by 10-20% are achievable, with a potential for up to 25% compared with conventional oil-based fuels.
[Show full text]
HGAC Access Management Studyl.Indd
Access Management Study Houston-Galveston Area Council l City of Texas City l Texas Department of transportation Final DraftFINAL Report REPORT December JANUARY, 7,2012 2011 Prepared by Acknowledgements H-GAC has provided planning solu ons for the Houston-Galveston area’s 13-county region since 1974. Each year, it manages the investment in transporta on improvement projects and provides a forum for interagency coopera on and public input into the stewardship of those funds. H-GAC works closely with ci zens, businesses and local governments to provide leadership to manage development wisely and facilitate change construc vely. H-GAC serves Aus n, Brazoria, Chambers, Colorado, Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, Liberty, Matagorda, Montgomery, Walker, Waller and Wharton Coun es, including more than 100 member ci es. The prepara on of this document was fi nanced in part through grants from the U.S. Department of Transporta on under Sec on 112 of the 1973 Federal Aid Highway Act and Sec on 8(d) of the Federal Transit Act of 1964, as amended. The contents of this document do not necessarily refl ect the offi cial views or policy of the Federal Highway Administra on, Federal Transit Administra on, U.S. Department of Transporta on, Texas Department of Transporta on, Houston-Galveston Area Council or the City of Texas City. Acceptance of this report does not in any way cons tute a commitment on the part of any of the above agencies to par cipate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with appropriate public laws.
[Show full text]
The Value of Texas Ports 6
Technical Report Documentation Plllte 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. TX -96/2994-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Apri11997 THE VALUE OF TEXAS PORTS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Perfonning Organization Report No. Zane A. Goff, William F. McFarland, Billy Edge, John Basilotto, and Sara Graalum Research Report 2994-1 9. Perfonning Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (fRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Study No. 7-2994 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Final Office of Research and Technology Transfer July 1996 - December 1996 P. O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Texas Port Association. Research Study Title: Identify and Assess the Collective Contribution (Value) of Texas Ports to Texas and the Nation 16. Abstract The foremost objective of this project is to demonstrate the importance of the ports in the State of Texas to the economy of the State and the Nation. Traditionally, the economic value of the state's ports has focused upon the economic impact to the region or a small sector of the state. Seldom has the full interior regions of the state been considered in the economic value of the ports. Moreover, the assessment will provide information including data, analyses and findings that may be used by TxDOT in developing a statewide port planning assistance program.
[Show full text]
Greater Houston Port Bureau Monthly Statistical Report
GREATER HOUSTON PORT BUREAU MONTHLY STATISTICAL REPORT Produced by the Marine Exchange of the West Gulf Using the HarborLights Vessel Tracking System 111 East Loop North Houston Texas 77029 713-678-4300 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 2011 YTD DEEPWATER VESSEL ARRIVALS BROWNSVILLE 20 21 41 21 CORPUS CHRISTI/INGLESIDE 134 115 249 270 FREEPORT 58 50 108 123 GALVESTON 69 56 125 168 HOUSTON 672 596 1,268 1,255 PORT LAVACA/POINT COMFORT 21 19 40 39 SABINE 163 141 304 298 TEXAS CITY 129 117 246 174 GRAND TOTAL 1,266 1,115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,381 2,348 HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL TUG/TOW MOVEMENTS 2012 2011 2012 Total YTD Jan Feb HSC TUG/TOW MOVEMENTS 11,226 10,641 21,867 20,522 PORT OF HOUSTON VESSEL ARRIVALS TERMINAL ARRIVALS 2011 2012 2012 YTD Jan Feb AGRIFOS 3 1 4 6 CARGILL 5 5 10 27 CEMEX 0 2 2 4 EXXON 44 40 84 90 GEORGIA GULF 0 5 5 3 GREENSPORT INDUSTRIAL 8 8 16 21 HOUSTON AMMONIA TERMINAL 2 3 5 7 HOUSTON CEMENT 3 5 8 9 HOUSTON FUEL OIL 40 33 73 76 INBESA 3 2 5 3 INDUSTRIAL TERMINALS 18 17 35 30 INTERCONTINENTAL TERMINAL COMPANY 47 41 88 81 KINDER MORGAN 48 29 77 61 LBC 28 29 57 53 LYONDELL 2 5 7 13 MAGELLAN 21 17 38 37 MANCHESTER TERMINAL COMPANY 18 14 32 19 ODFJELL 17 11 28 38 OIL TANKING 66 48 114 100 OLD MANCHESTER 8 9 17 15 PASADENA REFINING 2 2 4 2 PETROTEX 2 1 3 9 PHA BARBOURS CUT 56 50 106 93 PHA BAYPORT 31 32 63 61 PHA BULK PLANT 8 6 14 19 PHA CARE TERMINAL 9 11 20 16 PHA CITY DOCKS 54 53 107 111 PHA JACINTOPORT TERMINAL 11 10 21 25 PHA WOODHOUSE 6 9 15 19 SHELL 24 24 48 51 STOLTHAVEN 19 14 33 29 TARGA 7 8 15 16
[Show full text]
Regional Goods Movement Plan
H-GAC Regional Goods Movement Plan Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 What Is Goods Movement in the H-GAC Region? ................................................... 1-1 2.0 Goods Movement in the Region Today ...................................................... 2-1 2.1 H-GAC Freight System Overview ............................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Freight Significant Corridors and Facilities ............................................................. 2-18 2.3 Commodity Flow Patterns ......................................................................................... 2-20 2.4 Key Industries .............................................................................................................. 2-28 3.0 Key Trends Impacting Goods Movement in the Region ............................. 3-1 3.1 Employment and Population Growth ...................................................................... 3-1 3.2 International Trade ..................................................................................................... 3-5 3.3 Supply Chains .............................................................................................................. 3-8 3.4 Transportation Industry Trends ................................................................................ 3-10 3.5 Regulations and Policy ..............................................................................................
[Show full text]
An Analysis of the Value of Texas Seaports in an Environment of Increasing Global Trade
Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-09/0-5538-1 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date An Analysis of the Value of Texas Seaports in an Environment February 2008; Rev. October 2008 of Increasing Global Trade 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Peter Siegesmund, Jim Kruse, Jolanda Prozzi, Rene Alsup, 0-5538-1 Rob Harrison 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-5538 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report Research and Technology Implementation Office January 2006–August 2007 P.O. Box 5080 Austin, TX 78763-5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract This study undertook an economic impact exercise for all Texas ports, updated a similar study done a decade earlier, and so assisted TxDOT with incorporating the most recent marine port impacts into their state transportation planning. The study was awarded to a joint CTR-TTI team but work did not begin until the scope was clarified by TxDOT, following concerns expressed by some members of the Texas Ports Association (TPA). Almost all the larger Texas ports had undertaken economic impact studies and were understandably concerned about any new study providing different answers.
[Show full text]
Port Profiles Draft Report
Port Profiles Draft Report Houston-Galveston Area Council October 20, 2017 This page is intentionally left blank Port Profiles Houston-Galveston Area Council Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Port Industry Background ............................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Cargo Movement .................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Vessel Sizes ......................................................................................................................... 6 3 Industry Trends.............................................................................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................ 9 3.2 Panama and Suez Canals .................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Panama Canal ....................................................................................................... 10 3.2.2 Suez Canal ............................................................................................................ 12 3.3 Trends ...............................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Hitchcock 2018 State of the Community Report
State of the Community Report 2018 Foreword 2 Foreword This State of Community report was created by the Fall 2018- Plan 662 students in collaboration with Texas Target Communities and is for the internal educational purposes of the Texas A&M University students (the students who created this document) and Texas Target Community Staff who will be working on the Hitchcock Comprehensive plan in the spring of 2019. This document is not to be reproduced or published without the knowledge of the student collaborators. In the event that this document is published or reproduced outside of the University, the entities who own the reproduction rights of the photos on the cover need to be contacted in order to be granted permission to use their photos in the final document (these entities can be found in the citations throughout this document). If permission is not granted for the use of these photos, the student collaborators should be contacted and an appropriate alternative discussed. • Hitchcock ISD- Stewart Elementary https://www.hitchcockisd.org/vnews/display.v/SEC/Stewart • Hitchcock Chamber of Commerce https://www.hitchcockchamber.com/annual-banquet • Galveston County: The Daily News https://www.galvnews.com/blogs/in_focus/ collection_6b432c12-3e11-11e5-ab9d-e3d7d9e3d647.html#16 3 4 Beyond poverty and ability to reasonably afford housing, income is Executive Summary strongly linked to the economic opportunities in an area. From 2005 to 2015, Hitchcock’s economy experienced much growth, with the With an estimated population of 7,464 as of 2016 and population total number of jobs growing from 514 to 1,392, an increase of nearly density of 123 people per mile squared, Hitchcock is one of many a 171%.
[Show full text]
Chapter 4 – State of the Bay, Third Edition
CHAPTER 4 – STATE OF THE BAY, THIRD EDITION The Human Role, Present Written & Revised by Lisa A. Gonzalez The segment of the planet Earth called the coastal zone is especially important in the context of diversity and human interactions. This is by far the most populated and urbanized portion of our planet, as well as the richest and among the most perturbed. It is a bit surprising that it is also not the most familiar in concept and dimension, in view of the fact that so many people live within it or near it. —G. Carlton Ray, Sustainable Use of the Global Ocean, (1989) Introduction Human activities in and around Galveston Bay have shaped the watershed for thousands of years. The categories of resource use are wide ranging. From humans’ creation of the first shell middens to the present dredging of numerous navigation channels, human inhabitants have an impact on the bay and its surrounding landscape. As the human population grows, society’s influence on the physical and ecological components of the estuarine system becomes more pronounced. Anthropogenic stresses are placed upon the bay’s natural resources and the ecosystem services that they provide (such as clean air and water, flood attenuation, and wildlife habitat). The stressors diminish the health of the estuary and its watershed, as well as the quality of life of residents. The physical and ecological condition of Galveston Bay is a general indicator of the well-being of the regional environment. Most people realize that the bay is an important regional ecosystem, and they have a keen State of the Bay interest in protecting and maintaining its – Figure 4.1.
[Show full text]