DOCSLIB.ORG

A Plan for Galveston

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

GALVESTON COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT UNITED BOARD OF HEALTH 9850-A.106 Boardroom Emmett F. Lowry Expressway, Texas City AGENDA Wednesday, July 31, 2019 – 6:00 PM CONSENT AGENDA: ALL ITEMS MARKED WITH A SINGLE ASTERICK (*) ARE PART OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AND REQUIRE NO DELIBERATION BY THE UNITED BOARD OF HEALTH. ANY BOARD MEMBER MAY REMOVE AN ITEM FROM THIS AGENDA TO BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. PROCEED TO BOTTOM OF THIS DOCUMENT FOR APPEARANCE & EXECUTIVE SESSION GUIDELINES In accordance with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), persons in need of a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding shall, within three (3) days prior to any proceeding, contact the Executive Office at 9850-A.108 Texas City, Texas 77591 (409) 938-2401. ANY MEMBERS NEEDING TO BE REACHED DURING THE MEETING MAY BE CONTACTED AT 409-938-2288. REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING Meeting Called to Order Pledge of Allegiance *Item #1 ACTION ...........................................Agenda *Item #2 ACTION........................................... Excused Absence(s) *Item #3 ACTION ...........................................Consider for Approval Minutes from June 26, 2019 *Item #4 ACTION............................................Annual Policy Reviews a) Employee Complaint/Issue Resolution Policy b) Hiring Policy c) Communications Policy d) Purchasing Policy *Item #5 ACTION ...........................................Consider for Approval Appointments to the Animal Services Advisory Committee as Recommended by the City of Kemah and City of Hitchcock *Item #6 ACTION ...........................................Consider for Approval Quarterly Investment Report *Item #7 ACTION ...........................................Consider for Approval Quarterly Workers’ Compensation Report *Item #8 ............................................................Informational Reports a) CHW May 2019 Financials b) Morbidity Report c) Letter of Support for Gulf Coast Center’s Permanent Supportive Housing Program d) Letter of Support for City of Texas City’s Effort in Eradicating Rodents in Low Income Areas of the City Item #9..............................................................Executive Report Item #10............................................................Overview of Public Health Accreditation Board Standards Item #11 ACTION...........................................Consider for Approval June 2019 Financial Report Item #12 ACTION...........................................Consider for Approval Quarterly Compliance Report Item #13 ACTION............................................Consider for Approval Replacement of GAAA Supervisor Vehicle Item #14 ACTION............................................Consider for Approval Resolution Supporting Galveston Bay Estuary Program’s The Galveston Bay Plan, 2nd Edition, The Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan for the Galveston Bay Ecosystem Item #15…………............................................Presentation on Recent State Legislative Changes Regarding Certain County and Public Health District Fees Item #16 ACTION...........................................Consider for Approval the County Hiring an Outside Company to Evaluate all the Executive Positions in The District (Submitted by John Hackbarth, DDS) Item #17 ACTION..........................................Consider for Approval Sending United Board of Health Members to National Association of Local Boards of Health 2019 Annual Conference in Denver, CO from August 14-16, 2019 (Submitted by Eric Froeschner) Item #18...........................................................Comments from Board Members Adjournment Next Meeting: August 28, 2019 Appearances before United Board of Health A citizen desiring to make comment to the Board shall submit a written request to the Chief Executive Officer by noon on the Wednesday preceding the Wednesday Board meeting. A statement of the nature of the matter to be considered shall accompany the request. The Chief Executive Officer shall include the requested appearance on the agenda, and the person shall be heard if he or she appears. Executive Sessions The United Board of Health may recess into closed meeting (Executive Session) on any item listed on this agenda if the Executive Session is authorized under the Open Meetings Act pursuant to one or more the following exceptions: Tex. Gov’t Code §§ 551.071 (consultation with attorney), 551.072 (deliberation regarding real property), 551.073 (deliberation regarding a prospective gift or donation), 551.074 (personnel matters), 551.0745 (personnel matters affecting County advisory body), 551.076 (deliberation regarding security devices or security audits), and/or 551.087 (deliberations regarding economic development negotiations). The Presiding Officer of the United Board of Health shall announce the basis for the Executive Session prior to recessing into Executive Session. However, the United Board of Health may only enter into the Executive Session on any agenda item for which a separate Executive Session has not been separately posted if, prior to conducting the Executive Session, a majority of the Board votes to go into Executive Session. This motion requirement does not apply to any agenda item that has been previously noticed to constitute or include an Executive Session. The steps for enacting this procedure shall be as follows: 1. A Board member recommends that the discussion, so long as it pertains to one of the permissible exceptions noted above, be moved to a closed forum; 2. Additional detail about the subject-matter and why it should be discussed by the Board in private be provided to citizens in attendance, and citizens be offered the opportunity to ask questions about the matter which are to be answered at the discretion of the Board; and GALVESTON COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT UNITED BOARD OF HEALTH 9850-A.106 Boardroom Emmett F. Lowry Expressway, Texas City 3. An action or vote to commence for moving into Executive Session be passed by a majority Board members. The Galveston County Health District Boardroom is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are requested to contact GCHD’s Compliance Officer at 409-938-2492, or via e-mail at [email protected] at least 48 hours prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Back to Agenda GALVESTON COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Protecting and promoting the optimal health and well-being of Galveston County. Galveston County United Board of Health June 26, 2019 Board Members Staff Staff Present: Ben Raimer, MD Present: Kathy Barroso Present: Amy Weber Patrick McGinnis, MD Ronnie Schultz Stacey Bouse Mary Jo Godinich , MD Sharon Stonum Andrea Cortinas Eric Froeschner Ashley Tompkins Amanda Wolff Holly Lilley Richard Mosquera Della Brown, RN Cheryl Golla John Hackbarth, DDS Amber Adams Dr. Chad Clause Paula Compton Dr. Annette Jenkins Kenna Pruitt Barry Terrell Philip Keiser, MD Local Health Authority Excused Absence(s): Curtis Klages, DVM and Dewey H. Brunt III, P.E. Unexcused Absence(s): Tripp Montalbo Items # 1-5 Consent Agenda A motion was made by Dr. Hackbarth to approve the consent agenda items one through five. Dr. Godinich seconded the motion and the Board unanimously approved the consent agenda items one through five. Item # 6 Executive Session The United Board of Health will enter into Executive Session as permitted under the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, pursuant to Section 551.074 of the Government Code, Personnel Matters: specifically, to facilitate annual board evaluations. Item # 7 Executive Session The United Board of Health will enter into Executive Session as permitted under the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, pursuant to Section 551.074 of the Government Code, Personnel Matters: specifically, to conduct the Chief Executive Officer’s annual evaluation. Item #8 Reconvene Regular Open Meeting The meeting was reconvened at 7:10. Item #9 Possible Action from Executive Session Dr. Raimer announced that both the Board and CEO were reviewed in Executive Session. He reported that both reviews had good outcomes and things are going extremely well according to the evaluation numbers. Mr. Froeschner made a motion to approve Dr. Raimer’s assessment. Dr. Godinich seconded the motion and the Board unanimously approved. Page | 1 Item #10 Executive Report Kathy Barroso, Chief Executive Officer, presented the June 2019 Executive Report to the Board. Item #11 Consider for Approval May 2019 Financial Report Andrea Cortinas, Controller, presented the May 2019 financial report to the Board. A motion to approve the monthly financial report as presented was made by Dr. Hackbarth and seconded by Mr. Froeschner. The Board unanimously approved the May 2019 financial report. Item #12 Consider for Approval FY20 GCHD General Fund Funding Request to Galveston County Andrea Cortinas, Controller, presented the FY20 GCHD General Fund funding request to Galveston County to the Board. A motion to approve the budget request as presented was made by Mr. Froeschner and seconded by Dr. Hackbarth. The Board unanimously approved the FY20 GCHD General Fund Funding Request to Galveston County. Item #13 Consider for Approval FY20 GAAA Funding Request to the City of Galveston and Galveston County Andrea Cortinas, Controller, presented the FY20 GAAA funding request to the City of Galveston and Galveston County to the Board. A
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 7 – State of the Bay, Third Edition

    Chapter 7 – State of the Bay, Third Edition

    CHAPTER 7 – STATE OF THE BAY, THIRD EDITION Key Habitats of the Galveston Bay Watershed Written & Revised by L. James Lester The Gulf coastal plain rises gently from sea level to around 200 feet … Much of the flora is in tall grass and midgrass prairies and cordgrass marshes … The coastal marsh itself is a narrow belt of low wetlands. The fauna is very diverse, with more than three hundred species of birds relying on this area for food and rest on their spring and fall migrations ... Spanish records tell us that there were extensive open prairies of little bluestem, Indian grass, and sedges on the uplands between the many rivers. The bottomland hardwoods were abundant, with sugarberry, pecans, elm, and live oak. Now, most of the land has been plowed and cut into farms and ranches. —Richard Bartlett, in Saving the Best of Texas (1995) Introduction The Galveston Bay system contains a variety of habitat types, ranging from open water areas to wetlands to upland prairie. Regional habitats support numerous plant, fish, and wildlife species and contribute to the tremendous biodiversity found in the watershed. The maintenance of varied, abundant, and appropriate habitat is a requirement for the preservation of the characteristic biodiversity of the Galveston Bay system. Habitat is defined as the ecological or environmental area where organisms live. This chapter provides details on the most State of the Bay 2009 Bay the of State vulnerable habitats found – in and around Galveston Bay; including their location, relative area, CHAPTER 1 biological characteristics, State of the Bay – the ecological services 7 they provide and specific Figure 7.1.
  • DIRECT ECONOMIC EFFECTS of LACK of MAINTENANCE DREDGING of the HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL December 2010

    DIRECT ECONOMIC EFFECTS of LACK of MAINTENANCE DREDGING of the HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL December 2010

    DIRECT ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF LACK OF MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL December 2010 Prepared by CENTER FOR PORTS AND WATERWAYS TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE 701 NORTH POST OAK, SUITE 430 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77024‐3827 for PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. i CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND AND PROJECT APPROACH .................................................. 1 Phase 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Phase 2 ........................................................................................................................................ 6 CATEGORY 1: LIGHT LOADING ........................................................................................... 10 Selection and Data Acquisition ................................................................................................. 10 Valuation ................................................................................................................................... 13 CATEGORY 2: PARTIAL DISCHARGE AT WOODHOUSE TERMINAL ........................... 17 Selection and Data Acquisition ................................................................................................. 17 Valuation ................................................................................................................................... 17 CATEGORY
  • Port of Houston Authority Tariff No. 14

    Port of Houston Authority Tariff No. 14

    Port of Houston Authority Tariff No. 14 February 1, 2021 Additional Rates, Rules, and Regulations Governing the Fentress Bracewell Barbours Cut Container Terminal EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 111 East Loop North - Houston, Texas 77029 USA P. O. Box 2562 - Houston, Texas 77252-2562 Phone (713) 670-2400 - Fax (713) 670-2564 Barbours Cut Container Terminal 1515 East Barbours Cut Boulevard – La Porte, Texas 77571 Phone (281) 470-1800 - Fax (281) 470-5580 PORT OF HOUSTON TARIFF NO. 14 Page No. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE: DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS SUBJECT SUBRULE PAGE NO. Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... 048 ......................................... 11 Agent or Vessel Agent ............................................................................................. 001 .......................................... 6 Baplie ....................................................................................................................... 002 ........................................... 6 Berth ......................................................................................................................... 003 ........................................... 6 Bonded Storage ....................................................................................................... 004 ........................................... 6 Checking .................................................................................................................. 005
  • Changing Patterns and Perceptions of Water Use In

    Changing Patterns and Perceptions of Water Use In

    CHANGING PATTERNS AND PERCEPTIONS OF WATER USE IN EAST CENTRAL TEXAS SINCE THE TIME OF ANGLO SETTLEMENT A Dissertation by WENDY WINBORN PATZEWITSCH Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2007 Major Subject: Geography CHANGING PATTERNS AND PERCEPTIONS OF WATER USE IN EAST CENTRAL TEXAS SINCE THE TIME OF ANGLO SETTLEMENT A Dissertation by WENDY WINBORN PATZEWITSCH Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Jonathan M. Smith Committee Members, Peter J. Hugill Christian Brannstrom Bradford P. Wilcox Head of Department, Douglas J. Sherman May 2007 Major Subject: Geography iii ABSTRACT Changing Patterns and Perceptions of Water Use in East Central Texas Since the Time of Anglo Settlement. (May 2007) Wendy Winborn Patzewitsch, B.A., Trinity University; M.S., Southern Methodist University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Jonathan M. Smith Patterns and perceptions of water use have changed since Anglo settlement in Texas in the early nineteenth century. Change has not been constant, gradual, or linear, but rather has occurred in fits and spurts. This pattern of punctuated equilibrium in water use regimes is the central finding of this dissertation. Water use is examined in terms of built, organizational, and institutional inertias that resist change in the cultural landscape. Change occurs only when forced by crisis and results in water management at an increasing scale. Perception is critical in forcing response to crisis.
  • Trinity River Basin

    Trinity River Basin

    Below is an Electronic Version of an Out-of-Print Publication You can scroll to view or print this publication here, or you can borrow a paper copy from the Texas State Library, 512/463-5455. You can also view a copy at the TCEQ Library, 512/239-0020, or borrow one through your branch library using interlibrary loan. The TCEQ’s current print publications are listed in our catalog at www.tnrcc.state.tx.us/admin/topdoc/index.html. Basin 08 Trinity River 285 Trinity River Basin Narrative Summary Four forks of the Trinity River drain a large portion of north central Texas before merging into a single stream that flows south-southeastward and discharges into Trinity Bay on the Texas coast. The longest fork, the West Fork, originates in southeastern Archer County and flows across Jack, Wise, and Tarrant counties before joining the main stem in Dallas County. The Clear Fork originates in Parker County and flows southeastward, merging with the West Fork in Tarrant County. The Elm Fork originates near the Montague County line and flows across Cooke and Denton counties, converging with the West Fork in Dallas County. The river is called the Trinity downstream of the West Fork/Elm Fork confluence. The East Fork originates in Cooke County and flows southward through Collin and Kaufman counties, joining the main stem at the Kaufman/Ellis county line. The total drainage area of the system is 17,969 square miles and includes parts of 34 counties. The Trinity River Basin has the largest population of any river basin in Texas, the Dallas/Fort Worth metropolitan area alone containing more than three million people.
  • 2 State of the Double Bayou Watershed

    2 State of the Double Bayou Watershed

    2 State of the Double Bayou Watershed 2.1 Double Bayou Watershed Overview 2.1.1 Double Bayou landscape The Double Bayou watershed is located on the Upper Texas Gulf Coast and is part of the Galveston Bay watershed (Figure 2-1 Double Bayou watershed). Situated in the eastern portion of the Lower Galveston Bay, it is comprised of two main subwatersheds: East Fork and West Fork, which are also the primary waterways in the watershed. The Double Bayou watershed drains directly into the Trinity Bay system and ultimately into Galveston Bay. The majority (93%) of the watershed lies within Chambers County, Texas. The remaining 7% of the watershed is located in Liberty County, Texas. The Double Bayou watershed drains 98 square miles (61,445 acres) of predominantly rural and agricultural landscape. However, several residential centers are located in the watershed. Figure 2-1 Double Bayou watershed 1 The City of Anahuac, Texas is located on the Trinity River and the northeast bank of Trinity Bay. This rural community is the largest contiguous area of developed land in the watershed. Anahuac has a total area of 1,344 acres (2.1 square miles) and is nine feet above sea level (District 2013). Anahuac is the Chambers County seat, with a 2010 population of 2,243. Much of the middle portion of Chambers county drains into Double Bayou. The unincorporated community of Oak Island is identified by the U.S. Census as a designated place. Oak Island is located at the confluence of the East and West Forks of Double Bayou and Trinity Bay.
  • Port Services

    Port Services

    Port Services LJA Engineering 713.953.5200 Houston Dallas LJA.com Alice Deer Park Arlington East Houston Austin Galveston Beaumont Katy Cedar Park San Antonio College Station Spring Conroe The Woodlands Corpus Christi Jacksonville, FL Port Services Projects • GT Logistics Crude Oil Terminal, LJA Engineering is a multi-discipline consulting engineering Port Arthur, Texas firm serving both local and international private and public • New Liquids Terminal Dock, sectors for over 45 years, with a specialty focus on offering Port of Texas City, Texas efficient solutions in midstream infrastructure design. Our understanding of integrated transportation and storage • Port Arthur Valero Refinery Joint operations, experience in terminal development for marine, Outfall Canal Access Bridge, Jefferson County, Texas rail, and truck terminals, and knowledge of pipeline facilities set us apart. • Dock Inspection Program for Port of Texas City, Texas City, From capacity improvements to greenfield design, Texas LJA provides comprehensive engineering services • Lynchburg Ferry Hurricane for port and terminal capital projects. Harvey Emergency Repair, LJA’s staff of over 700 professionals thrives on challenging Harris County - Precinct 2, Texas projects and designing new solutions for our clients. • Sabine Pass Port Authority Our engineers are well versed in designing port projects, About Us Port Expertise Resources L-Dock, Sabine Pass, Texas meter and pigging stations, terminal piping, pipe racks, LJA is a full service consulting We offer multi-disciplinary
  • Chapter 3 – State of the Bay, Third Edition

    Chapter 3 – State of the Bay, Third Edition

    CHAPTER 3 – STATE OF THE BAY, THIRD EDITION The Human Role: Past Written by Alecya Gallaway At sundown we reached Redfish Bar, composed almost entirely of shells which extend from bank to bank the distance of several miles and appear to be formed by the confluence of the tide and the waters of the San Jacinto and Trinity, which unite a short distance above … This point is undoubtedly the head of navigation for vessels of heavy burden and has occurred to some as a more suitable site for a city than Galveston itself. —Texas in 1837, edited by Andrew Forest Muir (1958) Introduction This chapter examines the history of resource use in Galveston Bay and its adjacent land area. The chapter begins with a look back to the Pleistocene Ice Age and the impact of the earliest humans, continues with the use of resources by Native Americans and changes engendered by the transition to European-American settlement, and then focuses on the alterations that occurred to the bay as the regional focus shifted from agriculture to municipal and industrial development. This chapter describes resource use and human impact from pre-history to 1950. More recent developments and impacts are covered in Chapter 4. Resource Use: Prehistory to 1800 Galveston Bay is a recent feature of the Earth by geological reckoning. Thousands of years before the bay formed, water was held in continental ice sheets causing the sea level to be considerably lower than it is today. The shoreline was located 50–100 miles farther south into the area now covered by the Gulf of Mexico.
  • Chambers County Greenprint for Growth and Conservation

    Chambers County Greenprint for Growth and Conservation

    Published by The Trust for Public Land The Trust for Public Land conserves land for people to enjoy as parks, gardens, and other natural places, ensuring livable communities for generations to come. Chambers County Greenprint for Growth and Conservation Cover photo (left) by Amy Turner Cover photo (right) by Waterborne Education Center Chambers County Greenprint for Growth and Conservation A report by The trust for Public Land June 2009 The Trust for Public Land gratefully acknowledges the following supporters for their generous contributions toward this project: The Coastal Coordination Council pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA06NOS4190219 Chambers County Greenprint Coordinating Committee Greenprint Technical Advisory Committee Greenprint Strategy Exchange Team Exchange Week contributors to meals, lodging, and tours: Anahuac Area Chamber of Spoonbill RV Park and Lodge Commerce Turtle Bayou Landing Anahuac National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bayer Wallisville Project Chambers County Waterborne Education Center NRG Energy West Chambers County Chamber Oak Island Lodge of Commerce Rice Festival and Gator Fest Winnie Chamber of Commerce Speer Properties Additional thanks to the Chambers County community and all of the partners from local government, agencies, organizations, and citizens who participated in public stakeholder meetings and the Strategy Exchange Week. ©2009 The Trust for Public Land. All rights reserved. Greenprint for Growth is a registered trademark of The Trust for Public
  • Project Overview

    Project Overview

    CREATING NEW MARKETS FOR CLEAN ENERGY Project Overview July 2020 Introduction PILOT LNG IS AN ENERGY PILOT LNG IS WORKING WITH SOLUTIONS COMPANY, THE PORT OF GALVESTON ON FOCUSED ON THE DELIVERY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS (LNG) LNG BUNKER TERMINAL THAT TO BOTH NEW AND EXISTING WILL BE LOCATED ON MARKETS BY DEVELOPING AND PELICAN ISLAND. THE LNG OPERATING LNG IMPORT AND BUNKER FUEL WILL SERVE THE LNG FUEL/BUNKERING GREATER GALVESTON / TERMINALS AND RELATED HOUSTON PORT COMPLEX BY INFRASTRUCTURE. THE SUPPLYING CLEAN BURNING COMPANY AIMS TO ESTABLISH LNG TO THE RAPIDLY LNG TERMINAL AND LOGISTICS EXPANDING FLEET OF LNG- OPPORTUNITIES WORLDWIDE FUELED VESSELS. TO MEET GROWING NATURAL GAS DEMAND. 1 Why LNG as a Marine Fuel? • New international regulations effective January 01, 2020 require the shipping industry to burn fuels with <0.5% Sulphur (SOx) globally • In certain regions (US, Europe), the regulations are more stringent <0.1% • LNG has much lower emissions than conventional marine fuels • LNG emits zero SOx • LNG has virtually no particulate matter • LNG emits 90% less NOx vs. conventional HFO • LNG as a marine fuel is less costly when compared to low Sulphur fuel oil Pilot LNG Source: DNV-GL 2020 2 LNG as a Marine Fuel: Emissions • LNG has a much better emissions performance than conventional fuels and solutions. • LNG emits zero Sox, and very low particulate matter. • Compared to existing heavy marine fuel oils, LNG can, depending on the technology used, emit 80% to 90% fewer NOx emissions. • Utilizing best practices and appropriate technologies to minimize methane leakage, realistic reductions of GHG by 10-20% are achievable, with a potential for up to 25% compared with conventional oil-based fuels.
  • HGAC Access Management Studyl.Indd

    HGAC Access Management Studyl.Indd

    Access Management Study Houston-Galveston Area Council l City of Texas City l Texas Department of transportation Final DraftFINAL Report REPORT December JANUARY, 7,2012 2011 Prepared by Acknowledgements H-GAC has provided planning solu ons for the Houston-Galveston area’s 13-county region since 1974. Each year, it manages the investment in transporta on improvement projects and provides a forum for interagency coopera on and public input into the stewardship of those funds. H-GAC works closely with ci zens, businesses and local governments to provide leadership to manage development wisely and facilitate change construc vely. H-GAC serves Aus n, Brazoria, Chambers, Colorado, Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, Liberty, Matagorda, Montgomery, Walker, Waller and Wharton Coun es, including more than 100 member ci es. The prepara on of this document was fi nanced in part through grants from the U.S. Department of Transporta on under Sec on 112 of the 1973 Federal Aid Highway Act and Sec on 8(d) of the Federal Transit Act of 1964, as amended. The contents of this document do not necessarily refl ect the offi cial views or policy of the Federal Highway Administra on, Federal Transit Administra on, U.S. Department of Transporta on, Texas Department of Transporta on, Houston-Galveston Area Council or the City of Texas City. Acceptance of this report does not in any way cons tute a commitment on the part of any of the above agencies to par cipate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with appropriate public laws.
  • American Eel Biological Species Report

    American Eel Biological Species Report

    AMERICAN EEL BIOLOGICAL SPECIES REPORT U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 5 June 2015 This page blank for two-sided printing ii U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Northeast Region AMERICAN EEL BIOLOGICAL SPECIES REPORT Steven L. Shepard U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Maine Field Office 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite 2 Orono, Maine 04473-3702 [email protected] For copies of this report, contact: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Hadley, MA 01035 http://www.fws.gov/northeast/newsroom/eels.html http://www.regulations.gov This American Eel Biological Species Report has been prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) in support of a Status Review pursuant to the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531, et seq. This report reviews the best available information, including published literature, reports, unpublished data, and expert opinions. The report addresses current American eel issues in contemporary time frames. The report is not intended to provide definitive statements on the subjects addressed, but rather as a review of the best available information and ongoing investigations. The report includes updates to, and relevant material from, the Service’s 2007 American Eel Status Review. The report was published in January 2015 following peer review. The report was revised to correct typographical and minor factual errors and reissued in June 2015. With thanks to Krishna Gifford, Martin Miller, James McCleave, Alex Haro, Tom Kwak, David Richardson, Andy Dolloff, Kate Taylor, Wilson Laney, Sheila Eyler, Mark Cantrell, Rosemarie Gnam, Caitlin Snyder, AJ Vale, Steve Minkkinen, Matt Schwarz, Sarah LaPorte, Angela Erves, Heather Bell, the ASMFC American Eel Technical Committee, and the USFWS American Eel Working Group.