DOCSLIB.ORG

Dear Sir/Madam, I Am Submitting This Submission in the Hope That Parents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Dear Sir/Madam, I am submitting this submission in the hope that parents like myself will be heard and given fair consideration in regards to the ‘No Jab No Pay” policy. I am a parent of a child in childcare and next year Early Learning and a child in primary school and Out of School Hours Care. I am sickened to the core by the thought that I will have to leave the workforce and remove my children from care next year as we will not be able to afford full childcare, ELC and OSHC fees. If this happens we will also be forced to sell our house as we cannot afford the mortgage on one wage. My children are beautiful, warm hearted and full of potential. They deserve the right to an education through childcare and early learning programs as do all children. This legislation discriminates against parents like myself who cannot afford full fees. It does not affect the children of wealthy parents. My children deserve the same rights as their children. I am not a conspiracy theorist and do not just believe everything on the internet. I am open to all sides of the vaccine topic and critically examine and research every factor until I made my fully informed and educated decision. I am concerned about the authenticity of safety studies and the lack of independent studies, conflicts of interests, corruption, vaccine ingredients and the relevance of certain vaccines such as Hepatitis B, chicken pox and the Flu vaccine. I am not entirely anti vaccine. I am not opposed to the concept of vaccines for some illness and do believe vaccines play a role in places where living conditions and emergency healthy care are inadequate. Australia is not one of those places. I am opposed to not being free to make my own informed choice for my own children without penalty, discrimination or abuse from the media, medical profession, politicians or pro vaccine members of the community. I am opposed to the number of vaccines on the ever expanding vaccine schedule and not being allowed to choose what vaccines my children receive without penalty. My first child was vaccinated on a delayed and selective schedule which I established with my GP. Luckily my daughter did not suffer any severe adverse effects until she received her first MMR at the age of 4 years. Within hours of receiving this vaccine, she developed severe stomach pains and two years on now suffers daily from Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Her GP refused to acknowledge the reaction. My son only received the Infanrix IPV vaccine at 6 months of age. I choose the Infanrix IPV over the standard Infanrix Hexa as my child had no need to be vaccinated with the Hepatitis B component. By that evening my son was unable to swallow breast milk without gaging and was unable to swallow any pureed solids for 7 days amongst other adverse reactions. He then developed a food aversion and went from a child who loved food and had a terrific healthy appetite to one who was afraid of food. Again, the GP refused to acknowledge or even discuss his reaction. She did admit though that his throat was very inflamed. He was not sick at the time the vaccine was administered. The GP refused to report my sons reaction so I made the report to the TGA. Prior to the constant media and government vaccination campaigns, I was considering allowing my children to have selective vaccines at some point in the future when I felt they were more capable of dealing with side effects but as a result of this ‘all or nothing’ policy, I will never allow them to have another vaccine. My mistrust, hatred and anger of the government, powerful pharmaceutical companies and medical profession has been confirmed and increased as a result of this policy and the total disregard for parental rights and disrespect of my children’s rights. Vaccines are medical procedures. All medical procedures have risks. Each and every vaccine insert lists dozens of possible adverse reactions from mild to death. No medical procedure should be mandated as is does with this policy. If there is any risk, there needs to be a choice. The entire vaccine schedule has never been tested. Each individual vaccine has been tested through (biased) studies by its makers but the entire schedule has never been tested. My children are not science experiments and should not be treated as potential collateral damage when something does go wrong. I also believe this policy is a form of coercion and manipulation and stands against the concept of valid consent. The Australian Immunisation Handbook defines valid consent as: “Valid consent can be defined as the voluntary agreement by an individual to a proposed procedure, given after sufficient, appropriate and reliable information about the procedure, including the potential risks and benefits, has been conveyed to that individual” It goes onto to state that for consent to be legally valid, particular elements must be present: 1. It must be given by a person with legal capacity, and of sufficient intellectual capacity to understand the implications of being vaccinated. 2. It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation. 3. It must cover the specific procedure that is to be performed. 4. It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, risks of not having it and any alternative options have been explained to the individual. http://www.immunise.health.gov.au/internet/immunise/publishing.nsf/Content/Handbook10- home~handbook10part2~handbook10-2-1 This policy will force parents like myself to be coerced into vaccinating in order to keep their children in affordable care through receiving the child care rebate, benefit and end of financial year supplement. I will not be forced. I was vaccinated as a child in the mid 1970’s to the early 1990’s. Back then, the Australian Vaccine schedule only contained a small number of vaccines. After pharmaceutical companies were given protection from all legal liability, the schedule expanded rapidly to the ridiculous schedule we have today. If the schedule still resembled what it did in the 1970 and 1980’s I do not believe I would have ever questioned it. Today, the schedule includes vaccines such as Hepatitis B and Chicken Pox. Children are at almost no risk of catching Hep B unless the mother is infected or they are in high risk homes. It is a blood born virus mostly amongst IV drugs user and sex workers. All women are screened for it during routine blood tests during pregnancy. I am not Hep B positive and my children do fall into this risk group. They therefore do not need to be vaccinated against it. This policy forces all children to be vaccinated regardless of need or risk. When I was a child, Chicken Pox was a mild and normal short term illness which was considered ‘better to get it over and done with now as a child’ by parents. Contracting the illness normally results in life long immunity. Chicken Pox is almost always a mild illness in childhood but can be severe in adulthood. The short term vaccine immunity (if any) children are now receiving from the vaccine, will mean they are at high risk of catching the illness as an adult and would be at high risk of suffering severe complications. Below I have listed all vaccines and their ingredients on the Australian vaccine schedule. Please take time to read this information. National Immunisation Program Schedule Birth: Hepatitis B (hepB) 2 months: Hepatitis B, Diphtheria, Tetanus, acellular pertussis (whooping cough), Haemophilus influenzae type b, inactivated poliomyelitis (polio) (hepB-DTPa-Hib-IPV), Pneumococcal conjugate (13vPCV), Rotavirus 4 months: Hepatitis B, diphtheria, Tetanus, acellular pertussis (whooping cough), Haemophilus influenzae type b, inactivated poliomyelitis (polio) (hepB-DTPa-Hib-IPV), Pneumococcal conjugate (13vPCV) Rotavirus 6 months: Hepatitis B, diphtheria, Tetanus, acellular pertussis (whooping cough), Haemophilus influenzae type b, inactivated poliomyelitis (polio) (hepB-DTPa-Hib-IPV) Pneumococcal conjugate (13vPCV), Rotavirus 12 months: Haemophilus influenzae type b, Meningococcal C (Hib-MenC), Measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) , 18 months: Measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (chickenpox) (MMRV) 4 years: Diphtheria, Tetanus, acellular pertussis (whooping cough), inactivated poliomyelitis (polio) (DTPa-IPV), Measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) (to be given only if MMRV vaccine was not given at 18 months) School programs 10–15 years: Varicella (chickenpox), Human papillomavirus (HPV), Diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis Below I have listed the ingredients of the vaccines: Engerix B or HBVAX II – Hep B Ingredients – aluminum hydroxide, yeast protein, phosphate buffers http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf http://www.gsk.ca/english/docs-pdf/product-monographs/Engerix-B.pdf Infanrix Hexa – Diptheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, polio, Hib Ingredients - formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, polysorbate 80, Fenton medium (containing bovine extract), modified Latham medium (derived from bovine casein), modified Stainer-Scholte liquid medium http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf RotaTeq – Rotavirus Ingredients - sucrose, sodium citrate, sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate, sodium hydroxide, polysorbate 80, cell culture media, fetal bovine serum, vero cells [DNA from porcine circoviruses (PCV) 1 and 2 has been detected in RotaTeq. PCV-1 and PCV-2 are not known to cause disease in humans. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf
Recommended publications
  • EH&S COVID-19 Chemical Disinfectant Safety Information

    EH&S COVID-19 Chemical Disinfectant Safety Information

    COVID-19 CHEMICAL DISINFECTANT SAFETY INFORMATION Updated June 24, 2020 The COVID-19 pandemic has caused an increase in the number of disinfection products used throughout UW departments. This document provides general information about EPA-registered disinfectants, such as potential health hazards and personal protective equipment recommendations, for the commonly used disinfectants at the UW. Chemical Disinfectant Base / Category Products Potential Hazards Controls ● Ethyl alcohol Highly flammable and could form explosive Disposable nitrile gloves Alcohols ● ● vapor/air mixtures. ● Use in well-ventilated areas away from o Clorox 4 in One Disinfecting Spray Ready-to-Use ● May react violently with strong oxidants. ignition sources ● Alcohols may de-fat the skin and cause ● Wear long sleeve shirt and pants ● Isopropyl alcohol dermatitis. ● Closed toe shoes o Isopropyl Alcohol Antiseptic ● Inhalation of concentrated alcohol vapor 75% Topical Solution, MM may cause irritation of the respiratory tract (Ready to Use) and effects on the central nervous system. o Opti-Cide Surface Wipes o Powell PII Disinfectant Wipes o Super Sani Cloth Germicidal Wipe 201 Hall Health Center, Box 354400, Seattle, WA 98195-4400 206.543.7262 ￜ fax 206.543.3351ￜ www.ehs.washington.edu ● Formaldehyde Formaldehyde in gas form is extremely Disposable nitrile gloves for Aldehydes ● ● flammable. It forms explosive mixtures with concentrations 10% or less ● Paraformaldehyde air. ● Medium or heavyweight nitrile, neoprene, ● Glutaraldehyde ● It should only be used in well-ventilated natural rubber, or PVC gloves for ● Ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) areas. concentrated solutions ● The chemicals are irritating, toxic to humans ● Protective clothing to minimize skin upon contact or inhalation of high contact concentrations.
  • Dental White Paper

    Dental White Paper

    Institute for Science in Medicine WHITE PAPER THE ANTI-FLUORIDATIONIST THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH PREPARED BY JOHN E. DODES, DDS, FISM AND MICHAEL W. EASLEY, DDS, MPH, FISM APRIL 2012 Institute for Science in Medicine (ISM) is an international, educational and public-policy or- ganization comprised of health care professionals, scientists, and researchers who agree that the best science available should be used to determine health policy and to establish a standard of care that both protects and promotes the public health. We necessarily oppose policies which erode a science-based standard of care and thereby significantly expose the public to fraudulent, worthless, or harmful medical practices and products. Copyright 2012 by Institute for Science in Medicine. Permission to reproduce in its entirety is hereby granted, provided that it is not altered, not distributed for commercial purposes, and this notice is in- cluded. All other rights are reserved. White Paper: The Anti-Fluoridationist Threat to Public Health Declared by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to be one of the ten greatest public- health achievements of the Twentieth Century,1 community water fluoridation has been under attack by a small band of critics since its inception. The scientific consensus over fluoridation’s health benefits, safety, social justice, and economies has been firmly established over six decades of widespread use in the United States and elsewhere. Nevertheless, anti-science critics have never relented in their opposition — recycling previously disproven charges of harm, inventing new ones out of whole cloth, misrepresenting scientific facts and research, exaggerating risks, understating benefits, inappropriately invoking the precautionary principle, and accusing public health officials of corruption, conspiracy, and ‘mass medication’ of whole populations.
  • May 9-12 Rotterdam Netherlands

    May 9-12 Rotterdam Netherlands

    2018 ANNUAL MEETING MAY 9-12 ROTTERDAM NETHERLANDS PROGRAM BOOK www.autism-insar.org INSAR 2018 Sponsors We thank the following organizations for their generous support of the INSAR Annual Meeting. Platinum Sponsor Level Gold Sponsor Level Silver Sponsor Level Autism Science Foundation Hilibrand Foundation Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation TABLE OF CONTENTS Sponsorship .................................Inside Front Cover TABLE OF CONTENTS Special Interest Groups Schedule .......................... 6 Speaker Ready Room ............................................ 6 De Doelen Floor Plans ........................................ 7-9 Meeting Information Schedule-At-A-Glance .................................... 10-12 In-Conjunction Events .................................... 13-14 Keynote Speakers .............................................. 15 Awardees ..................................................... 16-19 INSAR MISSION Acknowledgments .......................................... 20-21 STATEMENT To promote the highest quality INSAR Summer Institute .................................... 22 research in order to improve the Abstract Author Index ...................................... 134 lives of people affected by autism. General Information .......................................... 208 Exhibitors ....................................................... 210 Strategic Initiatives Setting the Bar: Increase the quality, AM diversity and relevance of research promoted through annual meetings, journal, Keynote Address ...............................................
  • Download File

    Download File

    Page 1 “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” Mark Twain’s quote is more relevant than ever in times of online communication, where information or misinformation, bundled in bits and bytes, streams around the earth within seconds. SUMMARY This UNICEF working paper aims to track and analyse online anti-vaccination sentiment in social media networks by examining conversations across social media in English, Russian, Romanian and Polish. The findings support the assumption that parents actively use social networks and blogs to inform their decisions on vaccinating their children. The paper proposes a research model that detects and clusters commonly-used keywords and intensity of user interaction. The end goal is the development of targeted and efficient engagement strategies for health and communication experts in the field as well as for partner organisations. DISCLAIMER UNICEF working papers aim to facilitate greater exchange of knowledge and stimulate analytical discussion on an issue. This text has not been edited to official publications standards. Extracts from this paper may be freely reproduced with due acknowledgement. For the purposes of this research, no personal data has been extracted and stored for data collection and analysis. Page 2 CONTENT 1. Rationale 4 2. Introduction 5 2.1 Social Media: the conversation shift 5 2.2 Social Media: Fertile ground for anti- 5 vaccination sentiment 2.3 Social Media Monitoring 7 2.4 Influencers 8 3. Research Objectives 9 4. Methodology 11 4.1 Descriptive and Explorative Research Design 11 4.2 Data Collection 12 4.3 Limitations 13 4.4 Ethical Considerations 13 5.
  • Possible Dangers of Mandated COVID-19 Vaccination: a Special Interview with Barbara Loe Fisher by Dr

    Possible Dangers of Mandated COVID-19 Vaccination: a Special Interview with Barbara Loe Fisher by Dr

    Possible Dangers of Mandated COVID-19 Vaccination: A Special Interview With Barbara Loe Fisher By Dr. Joseph Mercola Dr. Mercola Welcome everyone, Dr. Mercola, helping you take control of your health and today we're joined with a veteran, the famous Barbara Loe Fisher, who is the co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), which is one of the best organizations out there, certainly one of the oldest providing objective, non-biased information about vaccines to help people make an informed choice about whether or not they want to participate in the vaccine program. Welcome and thank you for joining us today because we've got loads of information to discuss since the last time we talked. Barbara Loe Fisher: That's so true. Dr. Mercola [Crosstalk 00:00:38]. Barbara Loe Fisher: In a way, it's a culmination what's happened this year of everything we have been talking about for the last decade. I know back in 1993, I started to predict that the day would come when Americans would not be able to participate in society without showing proof they've been vaccinated with whatever the government says they have to be vaccinated with, and I think we're most definitely heading that way right now. It's been unprecedented what's happened in this country, and really around the world since January. Dr. Mercola A very clever and sophisticated strategy to implement that goal, for sure, and most of us or many of us believe it was planned for certain. I think that is probably the main topic of discussion, and there's so many other things that we can go on and tangents to it, but it's this mandatory vaccination.
  • Autism 2002 Mercury, Heavy Metals

    Autism 2002 Mercury, Heavy Metals

    Autism 2002 Mercury, Heavy Metals... Toxicity Stephanie Cave, M.D., F.A.A.F.P. Dr. Cave received her M.D. from LSU Medical School in New Orleans, Louisiana in 1983. She completed a residency in 1986 and is board certified in Family Practice. She and her colleague, Dr. Amy Holmes, are presently treating over 1000 children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in a private clinic in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Dr. Cave lectures on Autism and Vaccines and has recently published a book titled What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Children's Vaccinations. Last summer she testified before the United States Congressional Committee on Governmental Reform regarding the mercury content in vaccines. AUTISM AND IMMUNIZATIONS Stephanie F. Cave, M.S., M.D., F.A.A.F.P. I am honored that you have asked me to speak at the Autism 2002 conference. I would like to talk to you about a subject close to my heart---autism spectrum disorder and the possible link to vaccines. Presently my colleague and I are treating over 1500 children with this problem. In the past five years we have seen an incredible number of children recover from this devastating illness and take their places beside their schoolmates and siblings. This subject, as you might expect, is a very controversial one, but I think you will agree with me before the end of this lecture that this is an epidemic in medicine unlike anything that we have seen in the past. The debate about vaccinations has been going on since the smallpox vaccine was given during the early part of the twentieth century.
  • Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief

    Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief

    Case: 1:16-cv-04282 Document #: 2 Filed: 04/13/16 Page 1 of 22 PageID #:2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Case No. 16 CV 4282 Plaintiff, v. COMPLAINT FOR MERCOLA.COM, LLC, a limited liability PERMANENT company, INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF MERCOLA.COM HEALTH RESOURCES, LLC, a limited liability company, and DR. JOSEPH MERCOLA, individually and as an owner, officer, and director of MERCOLA.COM, LLC, and MERCOLA.COM HEALTH RESOURCES, LLC, Defendants. Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), for its Complaint alleges: 1. The FTC brings this action under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 53(b), to obtain a permanent injunction, rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the refund of monies paid, disgorgement of ill-gotten monies, and other equitable relief for Defendants’ acts or practices in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a) and 52, in connection with the labeling, advertising, marketing, distribution, and sale of Mercola brand indoor tanning systems. 1 Case: 1:16-cv-04282 Document #: 2 Filed: 04/13/16 Page 2 of 22 PageID #:3 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1337(a), and 1345, and 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 53(b). 3. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), (c)(1), (c)(2), and (d), and 15 U.S.C.
  • Comparison of Effectiveness Disinfection of 2%

    Comparison of Effectiveness Disinfection of 2%

    ORIGINAL RESEARCH Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science (J Dentomaxillofac Sci ) December 2018, Volume 3, Number 3: 169-171 P-ISSN.2503-0817, E-ISSN.2503-0825 Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of 2% Original Research glutaraldehyde and 4.8% chloroxylenol on tooth extraction instruments in the Department of Oral CrossMark http://dx.doi.org/10.15562/jdmfs.v3i2.794 Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of North Sumatera Month: December Ahyar Riza,* Isnandar, Indra B. Siregar, Bernard Volume No.: 3 Abstract Objective: To compare disinfecting effectiveness of 2% glutaraldehyde while the control group was treated with 4.8% chloroxylenol. Each Issue: 2 and 4.8% chloroxylenol on tooth extraction instruments at the instrument was pre-cleaned using a brush, water and soap for both Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of North groups underwent the disinfection process. Sumatera. Results: The results were statistically analyzed using Mann-Whitney Material and Methods: This was an experimental study with post- Test. The comparison between glutaraldehyde and chloroxylenol First page No.: 147 test only control group design approach. Purposive technique is showed a significant difference to the total bacteria count on applied to collect samples which are lower molar extraction forceps. In instrument after disinfection (p=0.014 < 0.05). this study, sample were divided into 2 groups and each consisting of 18 Conclusion: 2% glutaraldehyde was more effective than 4.8% P-ISSN.2503-0817 instruments. The treatment group was treated with 2% glutaraldehyde chloroxylenol at disinfecting lower molar extraction forceps. Keyword: Disinfection, Glutaraldehyde, Chloroxylenol, Forceps E-ISSN.2503-0825 Cite this Article: Riza A, Siregar IB, Isnandar, Bernard.
  • The Truth About COVID-19 Exposing the Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal Dr

    The Truth About COVID-19 Exposing the Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal Dr

    Also by Dr. Joseph Mercola EMF*D: 5G, Wi-Fi and Cell Phones: Hidden Harms and How to Protect Yourself (2020) KetoFast: Rejuvenate Your Health With a Step-by-Step Guide to Timing Your Ketogenic Meals (2019) Fat for Fuel: A Revolutionary Diet to Combat Cancer, Boost Brain Power, and Increase Your Energy (2017) Effortless Healing: 9 Simple Ways to Sidestep Illness, Shed Excess Weight, and Help Your Body Fix Itself (2015) The Great Bird Flu Hoax: The Truth They Don’t Want You to Know About the ‘Next Big Pandemic’ (2006, with Pam Killeen) The No-Grain Diet: Conquer Carbohydrate Addiction and Stay Slim for Life (2003, with Alison Rose Levy) Dark Deception: Discover the Truth About the Benefits of Sunlight Exposure (2008, with Jeffry Herman) Generation XL: Raising Healthy, Intelligent Kids in a High-Tech, Junk-Food World (2007, with Ben Lerner) Healthy Recipes for Your Nutritional Type (2007, with Kendra Degen Pearsall) Take Control of Your Health (2007, with Kendra Degen Pearsall) Sweet Deception: Why Splenda®, NutraSweet®, and the FDA May Be Hazardous to Your Health (2006, with Kendra Degen Pearsall) Also by Ronnie Cummins Grassroots Rising: A Call to Action on Climate, Farming, Food, and a Green New Deal Genetically Engineered Food a Self-Defense Guide for Consumers (2000, with Ben Lilliston) Children of the World (1990, a five-book series) The Truth About COVID-19 Exposing The Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal Dr. Joseph Mercola Ronnie Cummins Foreword by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Chelsea Green Publishing White River Junction, Vermont London, UK Copyright © 2021 by Florida Health Publishing, LLC.
  • Interview of Dr. Boyd E. Haley by Teri Small

    Interview of Dr. Boyd E. Haley by Teri Small

    B.E. Haley and T. Small/Medical Veritas 3 (2006) 921–934 921 Interview with Dr. Boyd E. Haley: Biomarkers supporting mercury toxicity as the major exacerbator of neurological illness, recent evidence via the urinary porphyrin tests Boyd E. Haleya, PhD and Teri Smallb aProfessor and Chair bAutismOne Radio Department of Chemistry 1816 Houston Ave. University of Kentucky Fullerton, CA 92833 USA Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: www.autismone.org Abstract In the recent past, several biological finds have supported the hypothesis that early exposure of infants to Thimerosal was the major exacerbation factor in the increase in autism-related disorders since the advent of the mandated vaccine program. These initially included the observations of a genetic susceptibility impairing the excretion of mercury and the increased retention of mercury by autistic children. This was followed by data indi- cating that autistics have low levels of the natural compound glutathione that is necessary for the bilary excretion of mercury, possibly explaining the genetic susceptibility. Other observations clearly point out that various biochemical processes are inhibited at exceptionally low nanomolar levels of Thimerosal, including the killing of neurons in culture, the inhibition of the enzyme that makes methyl-B12, the inhibition of phagocytosis (the first step in the innate and acquired immune system), the inhibition of nerve growth factor function at levels not cytotoxic, and the negative effect on brain dendritic cells. It is also now quite clear from primate studies that Thimerosal, or more correctly, the ethylmercury from Thimerosal delivers mercury to the brain, and causes brain inorganic mercury levels higher than equal levels of methylmercury.
  • An Enlightening Conversation on Autism « Dana Foundation

    An Enlightening Conversation on Autism « Dana Foundation

    An Enlightening Conversation on Autism « Dana Foundation https://danablog.org/2016/02/10/an-enlightening-conversation-o... An Enlightening Conversation on Autism FEBRUARY 10, 2016 An hour before a program titled “The Spectrum” began, featured participant David Amaral, Ph.D., complained that in the weeks leading up to the event, he had had trouble getting his hands on Snow Cake, a 2007 film in which Sigourney Weaver plays a high-functioning autistic woman. “I tried Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Hulu, and couldn’t find it anywhere,” said Amaral. “But I was eventually able to find the DVD on Amazon—and liked it very much.” That’s high praise coming from one of the nation’s foremost researchers on autism. Amaral, UC Davis Distinguished Professor of Psychiatry and Neuroscience and the Beneto Foundation chair, and founding research director of the M.I.N.D. Institute, and Weaver, an acclaimed actress, film producer, and noted environmentalist, discussed autism to a sold-out audience at the Rubin Museum of Art in Manhattan. Lyn Hughes Photography, courtesy of the Rubin Museum of Art. The program—the second in an annual Brainwave series that runs through April—opened with a clip from Snow Cake [here’s a short clip via YouTube]. Despite a review in the New York Times that called Weaver’s performance “convincingly precise,” few in the audience had seen or heard of the film. Brain- centric films, even when they are lauded for extraordinary performances (Concussion with Will Smith and Still Alice with Julianne Moore come to mind), rarely live up to box office expectations.
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0004156A1 Mellstedt Et Al

    (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0004156A1 Mellstedt Et Al

    US 2014.0004156A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0004156A1 Mellstedt et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jan. 2, 2014 (54) BOLOGICAL INHIBITORS OF ROR1 Publication Classification CAPABLE OF INDUCING CELL, DEATH (51) Int. C. (76) Inventors: Hakan Mellstedt, Stockholm (SE): C07K 6/28 (2006.01) Hodjattallah Rabbani, Stockholm (SE); CI2N IS/II3 (2006.01) Ingrid Teige, Lund (SE) (52) U.S. C. CPC ............ C07K 16/28 (2013.01); CI2N 15/1138 (21) Appl. No.: 13/516,925 (2013.01) USPC ...... 424/400; 530/387.9; 536/24.5:536/23.1; (22) PCT Filed: Dec. 10, 2010 435/320.1; 435/325; 435/375; 424/139.1; (86). PCT No.: PCT/EP2010/007524 514/44. A:536/23.53; 435/331 S371 (c)(1), (57) ABSTRACT (2), (4) Date: Mar. 1, 2013 The invention relates to antibodies and siRNA molecules for (30) Foreign Application Priority Data inducing cell death by the specific binding of ROR1, domains thereof of nucleotide molecules encoding ROR1. There are Dec. 18, 2009 (GB) ................................... O922143.3 also provided methods involving and uses of the antibodies Jun. 3, 2010 (GB) ................................... 1OO93O7.8 and siRNA molecules of the invention. Patent Application Publication Jan. 2, 2014 Sheet 1 of 25 US 2014/0004156A1 L/S.*L/SdXL|-WLIXCRIO6] N Patent Application Publication Jan. 2, 2014 Sheet 2 of 25 US 2014/0004156A1 a bi-saw exit-8 ext: xx x: i. s: s x 8. : xxx xx . ex* x8. gri syst {{..} : twic s yxi-xxii. 33. 8 M. : : ised-east x 8. Patent Application Publication Jan.