Theophilus' on Diverse Arts: the Persona of the Artist and The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Theophilus' on Diverse Arts: the Persona of the Artist and The Theophilus’ On Diverse Arts: The Persona of the Artist and the Production of Art in the Twelfth Century by Heidi C. Gearhart A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History of Art) in The University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Professor Elizabeth L. Sears, Chair Associate Professor Megan L. Holmes Associate Professor Helmut Puff Assistant Professor Achim Timmermann Heidi C. Gearhart © 2010 All Rights Reserved Dedication For my family, without whom this would not be. In memory of Aileen Brink and Lucile Gearhart, whose wisdom inspired me; and in memory of Brian Cornwell, whose courage and love changed us all. I will not forget. ii Acknowledgments Many wonderful people helped me complete this project. Scholars, colleagues, librarians and friends aided me with tasks large and small, and contributed their time, energy, and encouragement. I am particularly grateful to my advisor, Professor Elizabeth Sears, who guided me through this project and gave so generously of her time, energy and expertise. Through many conversations, comments, and suggestions, she helped me see the dissertation in a deeper, clearer light, and her encouragement, understanding, and patient assistance enabled me to shape the dissertation, finally, into a whole. I have been privileged as well to have a supportive committee; Professors Megan Holmes, Helmut Puff, and Achim Timmermann continually gave much time and thought to the project, and their comments and suggestions improved the dissertation greatly. I am grateful for their assistance. Generous funding from the Department of the History of Art at the University of Michigan made much of my work on this project possible. In addition, a research fellowship from the Turcihin Foundation, given through the Department of History of Art, enabled one of my first forays into dissertation research, while a fellowship from the Rackham School of Graduate Studies funded the final months of dissertation writing. A year of research in Belgium was funded by the Belgian American Educational iii Foundation, and I am especially grateful to Emile L. Boulpaep and Marie-Claude Hayoit for their assistance and support during that year. I am honored to be a part of the history of the Foundation and to be a member of the “boat” of 2006. In Belgium, I was fortunate to work with Professor Barbara Baert at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, and appreciate her time, effort, and many thoughtful comments. By her generous invitation, I participated in a manuscript workshop organized through the universities Leuven, Lille, and the Courtauld Institute; the comments and suggestions of professors and colleagues during this workshop were a huge help, and I owe particular thanks to Professors John Lowden and Christian Heck; to Kathryn Gerry and finally to Laura Cleaver, who has been an invaluable colleague, and given many insightful comments on Theophilus, on pedagogy, on Rupert of Deutz. I spent two years in residence at the Zentralinstitut für Kunstgeschichte in Munich, thanks to a generous fellowship from the Kress Foundation. While there, I was privileged to have the support of distinguished scholars and to know colleagues whose work inspired and challenged me. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Augustyn not only gave valuable support to me as an American visitor, but his comments and suggestions regarding Theophilus gave me new perspectives on the project. From the first day I arrived at the Institute, Dr. Iris Lauterbach was a tremendous help and resource, for which I am greatly appreciative. From my colleagues at the Institute I learned much, and I am grateful for the kindness, patience, and stimulating conversation of Benjamin Sommer, Anja Weisenseel, Michael Stöneberg, Manuel Teget-Welz, Li Töppe, Julia Weber, Jonas Beyer, and Claudia Schwaighofer. I was honored to work alongside fine American colleagues in Belgium and Munich, and benefited much from their company and expertise. Jessica Keating and Susannah Fisher helped me and stimulated me with conversations of reliquaries, automata, and the beautiful Codex iv Aureus. Victoria Sancho Lobis has been both a colleague and dear friend; I am ever grateful not only for her challenging thoughts, insightful questions, and sharp mind, but also for her bright demeanor, her strength, her encouragement. During research and travel I have been fortunate to meet some wonderful scholars, and their thoughts and suggestions have made it, in one way or another, into this dissertation. At the Metropolitan Museum of Art, Peter Barnet and Pete Dandridge gave me many helpful insights, and I learned much from conversations with them, and I owe many thanks to Christine Brennan for her kind support. At the Museum of Fine Arts Boston, I was privileged to work under Marietta Cambareri and the late Tracey Albainy, who taught me much, and alongside Frederick Ilchman, whose kind advice and encouragement has been invaluable. In Brisbane, Australia, I had the wonderful opportunity to discuss the philosophy of Augustine with Edward Morgan, and I am grateful for his help on the topic. Elizabeth Nogrady, in New York, has been a constant companion on this journey, and her positive outlook and wise comments were of tremendous value. The manuscripts of Theophilus are spread all over Europe, and I was given generous help from librarians, scholars and staff members in all of these places. For their assistance I am especially grateful to Christian Heitzmann at the Herzog-August Bibliothek in Wolfenbüttel; Andreas Fingernagel at the Österreichische Nationalbibliothek in Vienna; Pascal Trousse at the Bibliothèque royale de Belgique / Koninklijke Bibliotheek van België in Brussels; Christoph Mackert at the Universitaetsbibliothek Leipzig; Pierre-Jean Riamond at the Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris; Michal Broda at the Wroclaw University Library; Elaine Pordes at the British Library, London; Sally Speirs and Christine Ferdinand at Magdalene College, Oxford; Julian Reid at Corpus Christi College, Oxford; Jayne v Ringrose at the University Library, Cambridge; Tricia Boyd at the Edinburgh University Library; Susy Marcon at the Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, Venice; Rosella Pecchioli in the Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale, Florence; Wolfgang-Valentin Ikas, at the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Munich; Heinz Ristory, at the Stiftsbibliothek Klosterneuburg; Mireille Vial at the Bibliothèque interuniversitaire section médecine, Ecole de Médecine, Montpellier; and the staff at the Rakow Research Library, Corning Museum of Glass, in Corning, New York. I am also grateful to the librarians and staff at the Zentralinstitut für Kunstgeschichte, Munich, at the Central Library and the Maurits Sabbe Theological Library at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, at the Andover-Harvard Theological Library, and at the Burke Library at Union Theological Seminary, New York. Finally, I owe many thanks to the staff of the Fine Arts Library at University of Michigan, who for many years happily aided my research needs, and to Denise Edmund at Rackham Graduate School. The department and professors at Michigan went beyond the call of duty in helping me, giving time and expertise. In coursework and conversation I greatly benefited from the help of Ilene Forsyth, Sussan Babaie, Margaret Root, Pat Simons, Celeste Brusati, Susan Siegfried and Alex Potts; in Medieval studies and Classical studies I was lucky to work with Diane Hughes, Patrick Nold, Michael Bonner, and Donka Markus. I began my studies of medieval art at Tufts University, and my professors there have since offered continuous support, especially Professors Eva Hoffman, Cristelle Baskins, and Eric Rosenberg; I owe many thanks especially to Professor Madeline Caviness, who first set me on the path to study medieval art. My introduction to art history was at Pomona College, and I am ever appreciative of Professors George Gorse, Judson Emerick, and Diana Linden, who showed me what an engaging field it could be. vi My colleagues at Michigan have become great friends, and they have inspired me and helped me in countless ways. My thanks go to Katie Hornstein, Christina Chang, and Heather Badamo, who were a fine cohort, impressive in many ways; to Catherine McCurrach, who guided me in all things medieval, Noel Schiller, who helped ease my transition to Belgium. I owe many thanks to Chris DeFay, JP Park, Angela Ho, Diana Presciutti, Heather Flaherty and Kirsten Olds, who exuded unfailing calm and gave much helpful advice, to Katie Brion, Melanie Sympson, Kathy Zarur, Silvia Tita, Bea Zengotitabengoa, and Kristine Ronan for their support and conversation, and to Phillip Guilbeau, who patiently took notes at my defense. Beyond our art history department I learned much from Bob Rich, Ari Friedlander, and Mark Lotito, and I owe special thanks to Dimitri Krallis, Gavin Hollis, and Meredith Mira, who not only kept me going but kept me on the right track. Finally, my thanks go to Monica Huerta, for her insights, her comments, for brainstorms, and countless conversations, for her constant positive outlook and humor. Without her I am sure, it would have been a far more difficult, and far less pleasant, process. Friends and family at home and the world over have helped me in countless ways. In Munich, I owe innumerable thanks to Mike Marquès and Sabine Erneker for their unending encouragement and positive outlook; to Jemma and Sascha Klengel, for sharp wit, new insights, and warm encouragement; to Hanna Sophie Welker, for her consistent cheer and hospitality; and to Raynald Martin, Michael Fausel, Lisa Hanley, Patrick Brennan, Oliver Detjen, and Ingrid Fridman, for their wonderful support and humor; and to Susan McDonald, for helpful conversation about the nature of art-making and the virtues of labor. Dear friends and colleagues the world over contributed much. In Belgium, I was fortunate to know a group of extraordinary women whose studies of philosophy put the vii Middle Ages into context and whose wisdom guided me: Iina Koskinen, Defne Cizacka, Cordelia Rizzo, and Tonia Tatti. In Oxford I was grateful for the hospitality and kindness of Bryce and Eunice McLeod.
Recommended publications
  • BYZANTINE CAMEOS and the AESTHETICS of the ICON By
    BYZANTINE CAMEOS AND THE AESTHETICS OF THE ICON by James A. Magruder, III A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland March 2014 © 2014 James A. Magruder, III All rights reserved Abstract Byzantine icons have attracted artists and art historians to what they saw as the flat style of large painted panels. They tend to understand this flatness as a repudiation of the Classical priority to represent Nature and an affirmation of otherworldly spirituality. However, many extant sacred portraits from the Byzantine period were executed in relief in precious materials, such as gemstones, ivory or gold. Byzantine writers describe contemporary icons as lifelike, sometimes even coming to life with divine power. The question is what Byzantine Christians hoped to represent by crafting small icons in precious materials, specifically cameos. The dissertation catalogs and analyzes Byzantine cameos from the end of Iconoclasm (843) until the fall of Constantinople (1453). They have not received comprehensive treatment before, but since they represent saints in iconic poses, they provide a good corpus of icons comparable to icons in other media. Their durability and the difficulty of reworking them also makes them a particularly faithful record of Byzantine priorities regarding the icon as a genre. In addition, the dissertation surveys theological texts that comment on or illustrate stone to understand what role the materiality of Byzantine cameos played in choosing stone relief for icons. Finally, it examines Byzantine epigrams written about or for icons to define the terms that shaped icon production.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice
    Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice PUBLICATIONS COORDINATION: Dinah Berland EDITING & PRODUCTION COORDINATION: Corinne Lightweaver EDITORIAL CONSULTATION: Jo Hill COVER DESIGN: Jackie Gallagher-Lange PRODUCTION & PRINTING: Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas SYMPOSIUM ORGANIZERS: Erma Hermens, Art History Institute of the University of Leiden Marja Peek, Central Research Laboratory for Objects of Art and Science, Amsterdam © 1995 by The J. Paul Getty Trust All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-89236-322-3 The Getty Conservation Institute is committed to the preservation of cultural heritage worldwide. The Institute seeks to advance scientiRc knowledge and professional practice and to raise public awareness of conservation. Through research, training, documentation, exchange of information, and ReId projects, the Institute addresses issues related to the conservation of museum objects and archival collections, archaeological monuments and sites, and historic bUildings and cities. The Institute is an operating program of the J. Paul Getty Trust. COVER ILLUSTRATION Gherardo Cibo, "Colchico," folio 17r of Herbarium, ca. 1570. Courtesy of the British Library. FRONTISPIECE Detail from Jan Baptiste Collaert, Color Olivi, 1566-1628. After Johannes Stradanus. Courtesy of the Rijksmuseum-Stichting, Amsterdam. Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Historical painting techniques, materials, and studio practice : preprints of a symposium [held at] University of Leiden, the Netherlands, 26-29 June 1995/ edited by Arie Wallert, Erma Hermens, and Marja Peek. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-89236-322-3 (pbk.) 1. Painting-Techniques-Congresses. 2. Artists' materials- -Congresses. 3. Polychromy-Congresses. I. Wallert, Arie, 1950- II. Hermens, Erma, 1958- . III. Peek, Marja, 1961- ND1500.H57 1995 751' .09-dc20 95-9805 CIP Second printing 1996 iv Contents vii Foreword viii Preface 1 Leslie A.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustus Buys Rome
    Augustus buys Rome His conquests made Augustus the richest man of the Roman Republic. He could afford to cover all expenses that up to then had been covered by the whole of the Roman aristocracy together. Thus every citizen of Rome became his client and Augustus unchallenged sole ruler. Augustus buys Rome 01 The enemy is defeated After the Battle of Actium, Egypt fell into the hands of Octavian, the victor. The defeated, Marc Antony and his Egyptian queen, committed suicide. Cleopatra’s death, painting by Jean-Baptiste Regnault, 1796/99, Museum Kunstpalast, Düsseldorf. Source: Wikicommons. Augustus buys Rome 02 Jackpot! Octavian finally had access to the resources of a country that could have been part of the Roman Empire long ago. Egypt was weak, but the senate had refrained from invading it so that no senatorial member could win its enormous resources. From then on the land of the Nile was put directly under the control of the emperor. He considered the ‘Granary of Rome’ his personal property and no one was permitted to set foot on it without his explicit consent. Illustration from ‘Description de l’Egypte’, between 1821 and 1826. Photo: Wikicommons. Augustus buys Rome 03 Fight war to bring peace Octavian’s newly acquired riches allowed for a personality cult like Rome had never seen it before. Coins, statues, buildings and literature from the time all bear witness of Octavian’s celebration of himself as the founder of the golden age. This coin motif alludes to the solemn ceremony in which, during times of peace, the temple doors, the ‘Gates of Janus’, were closed.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam and Eve: Shameless First Couple of the Ghent Altarpiece
    Adam and Eve: Shameless First Couple of the Ghent Altarpiece Linda Seidel Jan van Eyck’s depictions of Adam and Eve were marveled at for their lifelikeness before the close of the century in which they were painted, and on subsequent occasions in the following hundred years (Figure 1). Yet interest in their astonishingly realistic anatomy did not engage sustained discussion until the twentieth century, testimony to both the complex history the Ghent Altarpiece experienced during the intervening period and the figures’ particular fall from grace.1 Documents report that the Altarpiece, which from the outset was on restricted view in the private chapel at the Church of St. John for which it had been made, was subject to additional events that impeded its accessibility. These included wars, during which the Altarpiece was dismembered and hidden, and changes in taste that resulted in the removal of the Adam and Eve and their replacement by properly clothed copies (Figure 2).2 Only in the twentieth century, when Jan’s Adam and Eve were placed on public view in independent exhibitions and then returned to their original positions on the reconstructed Altarpiece, did conversation about their remarkable bodies emerge as a topic in the scholarly literature. Figure 1. Adam and Eve, end panels from the upper register of the inner wings, Ghent Altarpiece, St. Bavo’s Cathedral, Ghent Different Visions: A Journal of New Perspectives on Medieval Art (ISSN 1935-5009) Issue 1, September 2008 Seidel – Adam and Eve: Shameless First Couple of the Ghent Altarpiece But even then, discussion regarding their depictions receded behind art historical interest in other issues du jour.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewing Heaven: Rock Crystal, Reliquaries, and Transparency in Fourteenth-Century Aachen Claire Kilgore University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Theses, Dissertations, and Student Creative Activity, Art, Art History and Design, School of School of Art, Art History and Design 5-2017 Viewing Heaven: Rock Crystal, Reliquaries, and Transparency in Fourteenth-Century Aachen Claire Kilgore University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/artstudents Part of the Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque Art and Architecture Commons, Architectural History and Criticism Commons, Catholic Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, European History Commons, History of Christianity Commons, History of Religion Commons, Liturgy and Worship Commons, Medieval History Commons, Medieval Studies Commons, Metal and Jewelry Arts Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, Other Philosophy Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Kilgore, Claire, "Viewing Heaven: Rock Crystal, Reliquaries, and Transparency in Fourteenth-Century Aachen" (2017). Theses, Dissertations, and Student Creative Activity, School of Art, Art History and Design. 121. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/artstudents/121 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Art, Art History and Design, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations, and Student Creative Activity, School of Art, Art History and Design by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. VIEWING HEAVEN: ROCK CRYSTAL, RELIQUARIES, AND TRANSPARENCY IN FOURTEENTH-CENTURY AACHEN By Claire Kilgore A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Major: Art History Under the Supervision of Professor Alison Stewart Lincoln, Nebraska May, 2017 VIEWING HEAVEN: ROCK CRYSTAL, RELIQUARIES, AND TRANSPARENCY IN FOURTEENTH-CENTURY AACHEN Claire Kilgore, M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Calontir Heralds Handbook
    Calontir Herald’s Handbook Third Edition [updated 2014] This Page Intentionally Left Blank From the Gold Falcon Principal Herald Greetings to one and all! I would like to thank all those individuals who give of their time and efforts in the service of heraldry for the Kingdom of Calontir and the Society. Whether it’s through an aspect of vocal heraldry (making event announcements, handling camp cries, doing court); field heraldry (calling rounds, directing participants, announcing winners); pageantry (presenting combatants & consorts, helping with display, holding heraldic competitions); book heraldry (creating devices, documenting names, running consulting tables, providing commentary); ceremonial & protocol heraldry (researching period grants, writing scroll text, keeping an Order of Precedence); silent heraldry (assisting those with hearing impairments) or through support of those involved in an aspect of heraldry…the kingdom would not run as smoothly without your endeavors This is the third edition of the Calontir Herald’s Handbook published for both heralds within the kingdom and other individuals interested in the various aspects that the art and science of heraldry takes within the SCA and in Calontir specifically. We hope that all will find this publication to be a valuable resource. As the SCA’s knowledge of heraldry continues to develop there come changes to the standards and policies that heralds need to be aware of. Readers of this handbook will note some changes from previous editions, so whether you are new to heraldry, or are a more experienced herald, please take the time to read through the handbook to acquaint yourself with the material that it contains.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Modernist Collecting: Some European Practices of the Long Term
    NORDISK MUSEOLOGI 1993•2, S. 87-98 TOWARDS MODERNIST COLLECTING: SOME EUROPEAN PRACTICES OF THE LONG TERM Susan Pearce The beginning ofmodernist collecting, and, ofthe particular kinds ofknowledge and experience which it embodies are usually considered to begin within the fifteenth cen­ tury, where interests concentrates on the accumulations ofthe Medici, and upon the cabinets ofcuriosities, which begin to appear, as the century draws to a close. Howeve1; this early modern collecting practice did not crystalize out ofnothing. The standard procedures ofhistorical investigation can suggest some obvious predecessors: the collec­ tions ofrelics and treasures acquired by the great medieval churches and princes; the collections of Greek art acquired by first century and later Romans; and the material held in Greek temples, described for us by Pausanius. But underlying all this collecting activity it is perhaps possible to discern some characteristics ofthe European tradition which inform collecting, and make it likely that modernist collecting, when it finally comes into being with the rest ofmodernist practice, will take the shape and signifi­ cance which it has done. 1 This paper2 endeavours to single out some very important themes, which will be dis­ of these fundamental European characte­ cussed at befitting length elsewhere. ristics, and to suggest why they are signifi­ Meanwhile, this discussion of some long­ cant. There are many related issues which term European practices, in Braudel's sen­ cannot be addressed here, and these inclu­ se of the term (see, for example, Bintliff de a definition of collecting, a view of 1991), and their relationship to collecting what constitutes 'Europe' and its 'tradi­ practice, is offered here as a contribution tion', and the significance which this may to the debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Gospel of John
    Love in the GospeL of John _Moloney_LoveGospelJohn_TW_kf.indd 1 7/29/13 3:49 PM _Moloney_LoveGospelJohn_TW_kf.indd 2 7/29/13 3:49 PM Love in the of GospeL John ` An Exegetical, Theological, and Literary Study Francis J. Moloney, sDB K _Moloney_LoveGospelJohn_TW_kf.indd 3 7/29/13 3:49 PM These websites are hyperlinked. www.bakerpublishinggroup.com www.bakeracademic.com www.brazospress.com www.chosenbooks.com www.revellbooks.com www.bethanyhouse.com © 2013 by Francis J. Moloney Published by Baker Academic a division of Baker Publishing Group P.O. Box 6287, Grand Rapids, MI 49516-6287 www.bakeracademic.com Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—for example, electronic, photocopy, recording—without the prior written permission of the publisher. The only exception is brief quotations in printed reviews. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Moloney, Francis J. Love in the gospel of John : an exegetical, theological, and literary study / Francis J. Moloney, SDB. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8010-4928-6 (cloth) 1. Love—Biblical teaching. 2. Bible. John—Criticism, interpretation, etc. I. Title. BS2615.6.L6M65 2013 226.5 06—dc23 2013019115 Unless noted otherwise, Scripture translations are from the Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright 1952 [2nd edition, 1971] by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cincinnati
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date: 9-Apr-2010 I, Edward Silberstein , hereby submit this original work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Arts in Art History It is entitled: And Moses Smote the Rock: The Reemergence of Water in Landscape Painting In Late Medieval and Renaissance Western Europe Student Signature: Edward Silberstein This work and its defense approved by: Committee Chair: Kristi Ann Nelson, PhD Kristi Ann Nelson, PhD Kimberly Paice, PhD Kimberly Paice, PhD Mikiko Hirayama, PhD Mikiko Hirayama, PhD 9/28/2010 1,111 And Moses Smote the Rock: The Reemergence of Water in Landscape Painting in Late Medieval and Renaissance Western Europe A thesis submitted to the Graduate School Of the University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In the Department of Art History Of the College of Design, Architecture, Art and Planning Master of Arts in Art History By Edward B. Silberstein B.A. magna cum laude Yale College June 1958 M.D. Harvard medical School June 1962 Committee Chair: Kristi Nelson, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This thesis undertook the analysis of the realistic painting of water within the history of art to examine its evolution over four millennia. This required a detailed discussion of what realism has meant, especially over the centuries of the second millennium C.E. Then the trends in the painting of water from Cretan and Mycenaean eras, through Hellenistic and Roman landscape, to the limited depiction of landscape in the first millennium of the Common Era, and into the late medieval era and the Renaissance were traced, including a discussion of the theological and philosophical background which led artists to return to their attempts at producing an idealized realism in their illuminations and paintings.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Aachen 2010
    Welcome to Aachen 2018 Program Description Schedule Overview: (please crosscheck connections at the station) Meeting Point: 8.30 am at the Bonn Central Station; Departure from Bonn: 9.02 am Arrival in Aachen: 10.45 am 11.30 am – 1.00 pm Guided Tour of the Old Town 1.00 pm Lunch in „Restaurant zum goldenen Einhorn“ (tbc) 3.00 – 4.30 pm Combined guided tour of the Aachen Cathedral and the Treasury (tbc) From 5.00 pm Dinner in Restaurant Altes Torhaus Afterwards: separate program for students / academics Meeting Point: Aachen Central Station at 8.30 pm Departure for Bonn: 8.51 pm Arrival in Bonn: 10.25 pm Information: The International Charlemagne Prize of Aachen “A CITIZENS’ PRIZE FOR DISTINGUISHED SERVICE ON BEHALF OF EUROPEAN UNIFICATION” Since 1950 the international Charlemagne Prize has been awarded annually for the worthiest contribution in the service of West European understanding and common endeavour, and in the service of humanity and world peace. The contribution can be made in the literary, scientific- scholarly, economic, and political sectors. The International Charlemagne Prize has become the most important and renowned European award for distinguished service in the cause of Europe and European unification. Among the 51 laureates were Konrad Adenauer (1954), Sir Winston S. Churchill (1955), George C. Marshall (1959), King Juan Carlos I of Spain (1982), Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands (1996), Anthony (Tony) Charles Lynton Blair (1999), William Jefferson (Bill) Clinton (2000) Angela Merkel (2008 and Pope Francis (2016). On 7th May, 2018 (Ascension Day) the Charlemagne Prize of Aachen will be awarded to the President of France, Emanuel Macron.
    [Show full text]
  • The Multivocality of the Cross of the Scriptures
    THE MULTIVOCALITY OF THE CROSS OF THE SCRIPTURES: CLAIMING VICTORY, KINGSHIP, AND TERRITORY IN EARLY MEDIEVAL IRELAND by Caitlin Hutchison A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Art History Spring 2019 © 2019 Caitlin Hutchison All Rights Reserved THE MULTIVOCALITY OF THE CROSS OF THE SCRIPTURES: CLAIMING VICTORY, KINGSHIP, AND TERRITORY IN EARLY MEDIEVAL IRELAND by Caitlin Hutchison Approved: __________________________________________________________ Lawrence Nees, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Art History Approved: __________________________________________________________ John Pelesko, Ph.D. Interim Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Approved: __________________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Lawrence Nees, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Lauren Petersen, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Denva Gallant, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Texts to the Illustrations
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Antiquity in plaster : production, reception and destruction of plaster copies from the Athenian Agora to Felix Meritis in Amsterdam Godin, F.T.J. Publication date 2009 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Godin, F. T. J. (2009). Antiquity in plaster : production, reception and destruction of plaster copies from the Athenian Agora to Felix Meritis in Amsterdam. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:27 Sep 2021 Venus or Diana (ancient Roman statue in Treves) ill.3-6 Victory: statue at the temple in Henna 38 Victory statue: controversy over the statue at the Curia in Rome 43 Vier Bücher von menschlicher Proportion
    [Show full text]