University of Cincinnati
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date: 9-Apr-2010 I, Edward Silberstein , hereby submit this original work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Arts in Art History It is entitled: And Moses Smote the Rock: The Reemergence of Water in Landscape Painting In Late Medieval and Renaissance Western Europe Student Signature: Edward Silberstein This work and its defense approved by: Committee Chair: Kristi Ann Nelson, PhD Kristi Ann Nelson, PhD Kimberly Paice, PhD Kimberly Paice, PhD Mikiko Hirayama, PhD Mikiko Hirayama, PhD 9/28/2010 1,111 And Moses Smote the Rock: The Reemergence of Water in Landscape Painting in Late Medieval and Renaissance Western Europe A thesis submitted to the Graduate School Of the University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In the Department of Art History Of the College of Design, Architecture, Art and Planning Master of Arts in Art History By Edward B. Silberstein B.A. magna cum laude Yale College June 1958 M.D. Harvard medical School June 1962 Committee Chair: Kristi Nelson, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This thesis undertook the analysis of the realistic painting of water within the history of art to examine its evolution over four millennia. This required a detailed discussion of what realism has meant, especially over the centuries of the second millennium C.E. Then the trends in the painting of water from Cretan and Mycenaean eras, through Hellenistic and Roman landscape, to the limited depiction of landscape in the first millennium of the Common Era, and into the late medieval era and the Renaissance were traced, including a discussion of the theological and philosophical background which led artists to return to their attempts at producing an idealized realism in their illuminations and paintings. To reduce or avoid the subjectivity inevitable in my analysis of the relative quality of the 266 images of water which I found in texts and museums, a semi-quantitative scale was devised. The scale provided descriptions and images of four levels of quality in the areas of hue, luminosity, reflection, motion, immersion, and perspective. The criteria were designed to be used by any observer, although the verbal scale and accompanying illustrative images would be used in any attempt to assess inter-observer variability. The examination of my intra-observer variability was crucial to this thesis, since the data have no validity if they cannot be reproduced. Both the six individual components, and the summed scores (resulting from adding these components), were found to have a high degree of reproducibility on statistical testing. This fact permitted a quantitative analysis of the trends in the development of the painting of water in the medieval era where the scores were very low until the criterion of hue first rises in the duecento . Not until the fifteenth century do the slopes of the six components graded for the quality of water painting all rise significantly. The subject ii matter of these images changes from having secular content in about 10% of images in the fourteenth century to 50% in the next century. Comparisons were undertaken between the levels of quality scores between Italian and Northern European artists. No differences were found in the summed scores between paintings and illuminations of the two regions except in the component of reflection, which received higher quality scores in Northern European painting than in Italian works. An analysis of which region produces the highest quality scores earlier revealed that the Northern European artists dominated in this area, led by Jan van Eyck. iii iv Acknowledgements This thesis is dedicated to Jonathan Reiss, Ph.D., whose generosity, friendship, commitment, and guidance were an inspiration to me. May his memory be for a blessing. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I wish to express my appreciation to Kristi Nelson, Ph.D., for her encouragement, guidance, scholarship, and patience, and to Mikiko Hirayama, Ph.D., and Kimberly Paice, Ph.D., for wise counsel. The writing of this thesis would have been impossible without the wonderful partnership I share with my wife, Jacqueline M. Mack. I am grateful for statistical consultation provided by Zheng Shu, Ph.D., technical assistance in reproducing color imaging by Mr. David Collins, and the computer expertise of Ms. Lisa Silberstein. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS v LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF TABLES ix Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION; THE HYPOTHESIS 1 Chapter 2. THE CONCEPT OF REALISM 5 Chapter 3. HISTORICAL, SOCIOLOGICAL, PHILOSOPHICAL, AND THEOLOGICAL INFLUENCES ON THE DEPICTION OF WATER 10 Chapter 4. DEVELOPMENT OF CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF THE PAINTING OF WATER 28 Chapter 5. DEFINTION AND SCORING OF THE QUALITY LEVELS 32 Chapter 6. DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS 41 Chapter 7. CONCLUSIONS 54 BIBLIOGRAPHY 56 FIGURES 71 TABLES 99 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Anonymous. Fishing and Fowling in the Marshes . C. 1400 B.C.E. Painting on plaster. 66 x 93 cm Tomb of Menna. Thebes…………………71 2. Anonymous. Landscape with Boating Part, House of M. Lucretitus, Pompeii , Second Century B.C.E. Painting on plaster, d.u. Museo Nazionale, Naples………………………………………………………… 72 3. Anonymous. The Calling of Peter and Andrew . C. 520 C.E. Mosaic. 122 x 152 cm. Ravenna. Saint’ Apollinare Nuovo…………………………73 4. Anonymous. David Playing in the Harp . Tenth Century C.E. Tempera on parchment, d.u. Paris Bibliotheque Nationale…………………………..74 5. Anonymous. River Landscape (detail). C. 715 C.E. Mosaic d.u. Damascus, Great Mosque…………………………………………………..75 6. Bonaventura Berlinghieri. Miracles of St. Francis (detail). 1235 C.E. tempera on panel. (detail).d.u. (full panel 151 x 102 cm). Pescia, Church of San Francesco………………………………………………………….. 76 7. Ambrogio Lorenzetti. The Effects of Good Government in the Countryside (detail).c.1339.d.u. Siena, Palazzo Publicco…………………77. 8. Master of Guillaume de Machaut. The Mysterious Garden .c.1355-1360 Paris: Bibliotheque Nationale…………………………………………… 78 9. Jan van Eyck. Baptism of Christ . Turin-Milan Hours, f.30v.c.1420 Turin. Museo Civico d’Arte Antica………………………………………………79. 10. Antonio and Piero del Pollaiuolo. Hercules and Deianira .c.1470. Oil on canvas transferred from panel. 54.6 x 79.2 cm. New Haven, Yale University Gallery…………………………………………………………80. 11. Jean Pucelle. Confirmation . The Belleville Breviary, Tome I, f37.c.1330. Paris………………………………………………………………………..81 12. Pol, Jean, and Herman Limbourg. St. Nicholas Stops the Storm at Sea. Les Belles Heures de Jean, Duc de Berry.c.1410. New York: The Cloisters………………………………………………………………82. 13. Jean Fouquet. The Right Hand of God Protecting the faithful Against vii the Demons . Book of Hours of Etienne Chevalier. F33v.c.1452-1460. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art…………………………………83 14. Reginaldus Piramus. Aristotle. Nichomachean Ethics . Frontispiece, Book VI.45v.c.1500. Vienna: Osterreichische Nationalbibliotek…………84 15. Cristoforo Maiorana. Ptolemy, Geography . f.296.c.1485. Paris: Bibliotheque Nationale……………………………………………………85 16. Anonymous. Christ Healing the Leper . Echternach Gospel Lectionary. 8th Century. MS Lat. 9389. Paris: Bibliotheque Nationale………………..86. 17. Guglielmo Giraldi. La Divina Commedia: Inferno, Canto VIII . F.20v. c.1481. Federico da Montefeltro’s Dante, La Divina Commedia Rome: Biblioteca Apostolico Vaticana……………………………………………87 18. Lucas Cranach the Elder. Nymph of the Spring.c.1510. Oil on wood. 15.2 x 20.3 cm. New York, Metropolitan Museum………………………..88 19. Anonymous. The Sixth Angel Sounds His Trumpet and the Tour Angels Which Are Bound in the River Euphrates Are Loosed . Latin Apocalypse IX: 12-15.f 15r.c.1320. New York: Metropolitan Museum…………….…89. 20. Anonymous. A Boat Docked to a Whale . MS Ludwig VIII 2 (83.MK.93).f.61v. c.1270. Los Angeles: J.Paul Getty Museum………..…90. 21. Guglielmo Giraldi and Giorgio d’Alemagna. Aeneas Shipwrecked . Virgil, Aeneid.f.228.c.1458. Paris: Bibliotheque Nationale………………91 22. Scatter Plot of Summed Score by Years…………………………………..92. 23. Scatter Plot of Summed Score by Years (Year>1200 C.E.)………………93 24. Scatter Plot of Scores of Each Component by Year and Source………….94 25. Cumulative Distributions of Percent of Component Peak Scores by Year……………………………………………………………………….95 26. Scatter Plot of Summed Scores for Paintings for Italian and European Sources…………………………………………………………………..96 27. Box-Whisker Plots by Painting Sources for the Six Components………97 28. Cumulative Percent to Peak Score by Year of Realistic Paintings of Water for the Six Components of Water Painting by Geographic Region…………………………………………………………………...98 viii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Water Realism Depiction in Western Art: Scoring Criteria…………99 2. List of Images Scored……………………………………………….101 3. List of Grades of All Images………………………………………..107 4. Distribution of Scores of Each Component for 266 Images………...114 5. Distribution of Scores of Each Component for Images of Northern European and Italian Origin…………………………………………115 6. Scores of Seventy-Seven Regraded Images…………………………116 7. Quantitative Reproducibility of Rescoring Results………………….123 8. Statistical Analysis of Levels of Agreement between Two Independent Readings of Seventy-seven Illuminations and Paintings Occurring Over a Year Apart……………………………. 124 9. Uses of Landscape in the Centuries under Study……………………125 10. Slope of Each Component by Century of Images Analyzed………...126 11. Artist and Year of Attainment of the Optimal Score………………...127