DOCSLIB.ORG

Mar03 People Before Pokies K Booth 0.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mar03 People Before Pokies K Booth 0.Pdf PEOPLE BEFORE POKIES A TASMANIAN GREENS POLICY INITIATIVE TASMANIA. Launched by Kim Booth MP CREATE OUR February 2014 OWN FUTURE Authorised by Nick McKim MP, Parliament House, Hobart ` > YOUR TEAM IN STATE PARLIAMENT > WANT MORE INFO? State Parliamentary Offices of the Tasmanian Greens Level 1, 162 Macquarie Street, Hobart, 7000 Postal Address: Parliament House, Hobart, 7000 Phone: (03) 6233 8300 Fax: (03) 6223 1406 E-mail: greens@parliament.tas.gov.au Web: mps.tas.greens.org.au Tasmanian Greens Policy Initiative: People Before Pokies | Issued on 03 March 2014 | Authorised by Nick McKim MP, Parliament House, Hobart People before Pokies A Five Year Plan to Remove Pokies from Tasmania The Tasmanian Greens have a plan to make Tasmania pokie-free over five years. In the calendar year January 2013 to January 2014 Tasmanians lost • Despite the much lauded Federal Labor gambling mandatory pre- $206, 326, 356 on pokies. commitment promises, these promises were broken, leaving little changed at the federal arena, making state intervention all the This is an average of $17, 193, 863 over 12 months. more urgent. This is $402.25 lost per every Tasmanian. (as per Treasury’s latest • Community, welfare and church groups have been calling for Population data.) action on pokies for the last decade, only to be ignored by successive state governments as the problem intensifies. Community organisations, churches, small businesses, legal representatives are calling for action to stop the damage pokies are wreaking on our communities – the Greens will make Tasmania pokie- free over five years. > OUR PLAN Commence a five year withdrawal period, at the end of which pokies > THE ISSUE will no longer be permitted to operate in Tasmania • Tasmanians lose between $14 million – $17 million each month This includes all pokies in Tasmania’s hotels, clubs, casinos on pokies - more than $400 annually per man, woman and child. and TT-Line vessels Around 40 per cent of that money is lost by problem gamblers. Creation of a ‘Pokie Transition Adaptation Fund’ (receiving • Over the last five years Tasmanians have lost more than $200 money currently lining the pockets of the monopoly holder) million each year on pokies – that is over $1 billion. will see pokies fund their own removal, ensuring the proposal remains cost neutral. • Anglicare Tasmania estimates there are more than 2, 500 people with a gambling problem in Tasmania, but for every problem Amend the Gaming Control Act 1993 to end the monopoly gambler, another 5 – 10 people are affected. This means almost held by Federal Hotels (Federal Group) over Tasmanian 27, 500 Tasmanians are adversely affected by problem gambling. pokies. • The Tasmanian government’s monopoly arrangement with Provide Federal Hotels a fair and equitable exit package, Federal Hotels locks in a potential total of 3680 pokies. negotiated by the Auditor-General. • The monopoly arrangement, the Deed of Agreement, was Help venues identify and implement alternative forms of secretly extended for another 15 years in 2003, it will now not revenue raising entertainment and provide business planning expire until 2023. assistance. • Pokies are recognised as the most dangerous and addictive form Implement harm minimisation strategies throughout the of gambling currently available. transition period, including a $1 bet limit on all pokies. • The latest Treasury figures show Tasmania has 3 572 pokies Require casinos to contribute four per cent of gaming profits across the casinos and pub and club venues. to the Community Support Levy. • The Productivity Commission’s Report on gambling indicated that The Greens are committed to ending the current situation where people can lose $1, 200 per hour. The Commission also estimates substantial profit is made from the losses of those who can least that the average annual cost to the community for each problem afford to lose. gambler is between $10,500 and $33,600. • Anglicare’s ‘Nothing Left to Lose’ report highlights the increasing trend of people ending up before the courts and in gaol due to problem gambling This results in social and financial costs of relationship breakdowns, imprisonment, suicide, demands on counselling and support services. Tasmanian Greens Policy Initiative: People Before Pokies | Issued on 3 March 2014 | Authorised by Nick McKim MP, Parliament House, Hobart Page 1 of 3 ` “The government will not be liable in damages or in any other > DELIVERING OUR POLICY remedy to Federal Hotels or the other parties to the deed if the parliament amends or repeals the deed”. There are three main courses of action comprising our plan to have removed pokies from Tasmania in five years: > Casinos to Contribute to the CSL (1) legislative reform by which to drive the structural changes required to wean government from pokies revenue; The Greens attempt to require Tasmania’s casinos to contribute to the (2) the establishment of financial transition arrangements to assist Community Support Levy were blocked by both the other two parties companies and venues to exit from current pokie arrangements; in October 2011. and Under this commitment we will legislate to ensure casinos (3) of equal importance will be the harm minimisation arrangements contribute to the CSL while we transition out of pokies over which will be introduced immediately to operate in conjunction the five year period. with the five year transition to becoming a pokie free state, to help Tasmanians affected by pokies and problem gambling. The Greens estimate that should casinos contribute four per cent of their gross profits, as pub and club pokies venues are required to do under the Gaming Control Act 1993, an additional $3 million to $ 4 million each year could be > Legislative Reform injected into the Community Support Levy. Ending the monopoly The first step in implementing this commitment is to end the existing monopoly arrangement with Federal Hotels. > Financial Transition and Reform Schedule 1 of the Gaming Control Act 1993 contains a Deed of Agreement between Federal Hotels (amongst others) and the Crown in Exit Package for Federal Hotels (Federal Group Right of the State of Tasmania, providing an ‘Exclusive Right’ for Tasmania) operation of gaming machines, casinos and Keno within Tasmania. While no legal obligation exists to compensate Federal Hotels in the It is this Deed that provides Federal Hotels with its monopoly over event the State Parliament legislates to end their monopoly, the Tasmanian pokies, in hotel and club venues, as well as in the two Tasmanian Greens believe it is responsible to negotiate a fair exit casinos. package. The Tasmanian Greens will introduce legislation amending the Gaming To achieve this, the Auditor General will be engaged to assess Control Act 1993. This amendment will: the options available for negotiating a takeover of the pokie machines (which will be subsequently destroyed and recycled Vest the monopoly held by Federal Hotels in the Crown at the end of the transition period). Commence a five year withdrawal period, at the end of which This negotiated exit package will be funded from the Pokie pokies will no longer be permitted to operate in Tasmania Transition Adaptation Fund ultimately ensuring the implementation of this proposal remains cost neutral. > Parliament Can Amend the Act Pokie Transition Adaptation Fund Section 7 of the Gaming Control Act 1993 states that: Through the legislative reforms above, the current monopoly vested in “If there is an inconsistency between a provision of this Act and a Federal hotels, is vested in the Crown. That means the Crown will provision of the 2003 Deed, the provision of this Act prevails”. receive a larger spike of the pokies income until the end of the five year transition period, due to receiving Federal hotels’ pokies income. Amending the Act will therefore end the monopoly over pokie machines without impacting upon other arrangements with regard to The second part of the legislative reform is to establish a Pokie operating casinos and Keno. Transition Adaption Fund, where based on recent figures the Fund could receive between $160 million to $180 million over the five year In 2003 the Tasmanian Greens received advice from noted transition period, factoring in a set percentage decrease in the current constitutional law expert Mr Michael Stokes on the capacity of number of pokies around Tasmania. Parliament to change the monopoly arrangement. This fund, consisting of rediverted pokies revenue will pay for the In summary, Mr Stokes’ advice is that: phase out of poker machines over the five year transition period. “There is no limit to the power of the Tasmanian parliament (It is also important to note that this total could be much lower a s a to amend or repeal the deed to enact legislation which is result of the $1 bet limit also being implemented. inconsistent with it. Tasmanian Greens Policy Initiative: People Before Pokies | Issued on 3 March 2014 | Authorised by Nick McKim MP, Parliament House, Hobart Page 2 of 3 ` The purpose of the new ‘Pokie Transition Adaptation Fund’ is to: Restrict coin changing machines limits • Fund a pokie buyback scheme; and The Greens would introduce restriction on automatic coin machines in venues, ensuring that a maximum limit on exchanging dollar notes for • Assist venues in: coins is established. We will work with welfare agencies, the Tasmanian Gaming Commission and other stakeholders to establish an Identifying and adopting alternative forms of revenue raising appropriate limit and timeframe for this reform to be implemented. entertainment to replace pokies income Plain packaging on Pokies Obtaining expert business planning assistance to readjust to operating without pokies. The Greens will also trial ‘plain packaging’ on pokies. This will The ‘Pokie Transition Adaptation Fund’ will serve three broad purposes: strengthen the state’s harm minimisation toolkit, while along with the $1 Bet limit and the eventual roll back of pokies out of the community.
Load more
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

—— Preview end. ——

Recommended publications
  • Senator Bob Brown - Australian Greens
    Senator Bob Brown - Australian Greens Bob Brown, born in 1944, was educated in rural New South Wales, became captain of Blacktown Boys High School in Sydney and graduated in medicine from Sydney University in 1968. He became the Director of the Wilderness Society which organised the blockade of the dam-works on Tasmania’s wild Franklin River in 1982/3. Some 1500 people were arrested and 600 jailed, including Bob Brown who spent 19 days in Risdon Prison. On the day of his release, he was elected as the first Green into Tasmania's Parliament. After federal government intervention, the Franklin River was protected in 1983. As a State MP, Bob Brown introduced a wide range of private member's initiatives, including for freedom of information, death with dignity, lowering parliamentary salaries, gay law reform, banning the battery-hen industry and nuclear free Tasmania. Some succeeded, others not. Regrettably, his 1987 bill to ban semi-automatic guns was voted down by both Liberal and Labor members of the House of Assembly, seven years before the Port Arthur massacre. In 1989, he led the parliamentary team of five Greens which held the balance of power with the Field Labor Government. The Greens saved 25 schools from closure, instigated the Local Employment Initiatives which created more than 1000 jobs in depressed areas, doubled the size of Tasmania's Wilderness World Heritage Area to 1.4 million hectares, created the Douglas-Apsley National Park and supported tough fiscal measures to recover from the debts of the previous Liberal regime. Bob resigned from the State Parliament in 1993 and Christine Milne took over as leader of the Tasmanian Greens.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitlam's Children? Labor and the Greens in Australia (2007-2013
    Whitlam’s Children? Labor and the Greens in Australia (2007-2013) Shaun Crowe A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Australian National University March 2017 © Shaun Crowe, 2017 1 The work presented in this dissertation is original, to the best of my knowledge and belief, except as acknowledged in the text. The material has not been submitted, in whole or in part, for a degree at The Australian National University or any other university. This research is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship. 2 Acknowledgments Before starting, I was told that completing a doctoral thesis was rewarding and brutal. Having now written one, these both seem equally true. Like all PhD students, I never would have reached this point without the presence, affirmation and help of the people around me. The first thanks go to Professor John Uhr. Four and half years on, I’m so lucky to have stumbled into your mentorship. With such a busy job, I don’t know how you find the space to be so generous, both intellectually and with your time. Your prompt, at times cryptic, though always insightful feedback helped at every stage of the process. Even more useful were the long and digressive conversations in your office, covering the world between politics and philosophy. I hope they continue. The second round of thanks go to the people who aided me at different points. Thanks to Guy Ragen, Dr Jen Rayner and Alice Workman for helping me source interviews. Thanks to Emily Millane, Will Atkinson, Dr Lizzy Watt, and Paul Karp for editing chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of the Australian Greens
    Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information, analysis and advice for the Parliament RESEARCH PAPER www.aph.gov.au/library 22 September 2008, no. 8, 2008–09, ISSN 1834-9854 The rise of the Australian Greens Scott Bennett Politics and Public Administration Section Executive summary The first Australian candidates to contest an election on a clearly-espoused environmental policy were members of the United Tasmania Group in the 1972 Tasmanian election. Concerns for the environment saw the emergence in the 1980s of a number of environmental groups, some contested elections, with successes in Western Australia and Tasmania. An important development was the emergence in the next decade of the Australian Greens as a unified political force, with Franklin Dam activist and Tasmanian MP, Bob Brown, as its nationally-recognised leader. The 2004 and 2007 Commonwealth elections have resulted in five Australian Green Senators in the 42nd Parliament, the best return to date. This paper discusses the electoral support that Australian Greens candidates have developed, including: • the emergence of environmental politics is placed in its historical context • the rise of voter support for environmental candidates • an analysis of Australian Greens voters—who they are, where they live and the motivations they have for casting their votes for this party • an analysis of the difficulties such a party has in winning lower house seats in Australia, which is especially related to the use of Preferential Voting for most elections • the strategic problems that the Australian Greens—and any ‘third force’—have in the Australian political setting • the decline of the Australian Democrats that has aided the Australian Greens upsurge and • the question whether the Australian Greens will ever be more than an important ‘third force’ in Australian politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Experiences of the Tasmanian Greens: the Politics of the Periphery1
    in Ecopolitics: Thought and Action, Vol 1, No 1, 2000, pp. 53-71. Parliamentary Experiences of the Tasmanian Greens: The Politics of the Periphery1 i Kate Crowley ABSTRACT This paper reflects upon the green political trajectory in Tasmania from the founding in 1972 of the world's first green2 party, the United Tasmania Group, to the recent 'electoral reform’ that in effect disenfranchised most of the Tasmanian parliamentary greens (Crowley, 2000). It argues that green politics, whilst fundamentally transforming the island state of Tasmania in part through its nature conservation successes, has remained a politics at the periphery that is resisted by both the major parties. This peripheralisation is not entirely owed to the green's longstanding pursuit of wilderness preservation, however, but also to their preoccupation both with progressive politics and democratic accountability that has led them into state parliament where they have twice achieved the balance of power (Crowley, 1996; 1999b). This paper recounts familiar terrain with its description of Tasmania as a conservative, economically marginal island state that has pursued a development formula based upon resource exploitation and hydroindustrialisation that went unchallenged until the rise of the greens. It shows how Tasmania's green politics, perhaps unlike green politics in more vital, less marginal contexts, has been a politics of contrast and change, ecocentric to its core, but strategically concerned with broader social reformism. By considering the failure of both green minority governments (Labor-Green 1989-91; and Liberal-Green 1996-8), it further reinforces how much the major parties have resisted green efforts both to share the state political stage and to move more than rhetorically away from resource based developmentalism3.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Heritage Register Datasheet
    Tasmanian Heritage Register Datasheet 103 Macquarie Street (GPO Box 618) Hobart Tasmania 7001 Phone: 1300 850 332 (local call cost) Email: enquiries@heritage.tas.gov.au Web: www.heritage.tas.gov.au Name: Oura Oura THR ID Number: 11875 Status: Permanently Registered Municipality: Northern Midlands Council Tier: State Location Addresses Title References Property Id 159 GULF RD, LIFFEY 7301 TAS 202805/1 6753804 Dr Bob Brown Wilderness Society Oura Oura and the Former dairy building, members with Dr Bob Cluan Tiers Oura Oura Bush Heritage Brown 1983 DPIPWE 2018 DPIPWE 2018 Australia Wilderness Society Collection Former barn ('Jacob Verandah and front of Dr Bob Brown, Oura Shed'), Oura Oura house, Oura Oura Oura and Drys Bluff DPIPWE 2018 DPIPWE 2018 DPIPWE 2018 Setting: Oura Oura has a picturesque location at the foot of Drys Bluff, a peak of the Great Western Tiers, at the southern end of the basaltic inner northern Tasmanian farmlands . The Upper Liffey River separates Gulf Road from the paddocks in front of the house. Behind the house, the forested slopes rise to the dolerite cliffs of the often snow-clad mountain. This setting, with the simple house dwarfed by a rugged peak, recalls the ‘Sublime’ artistic tradition favoured by Romantic artists and ‘wilderness’ photographers . A Drys Bluff walking track constructed by the Dean family and used regularly by Bob Brown climbs through the regrowth eucalypt forest of the Oura Oura Reserve. Description: Oura Oura is a simple L-shaped weatherboard Queen Anne Federation farm house built on a rise south of the Liffey River. It has a hipped and gable roof with front verandah, and modern red Colorbond roof sheeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Balancing Act: the Australian Greens 2008-2011
    Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services RESEARCH PAPER NO. 7, 2011–12 8 February 2012 Balancing act: the Australian Greens 2008–2011 Dr Joy McCann Politics and Public Administration Section Executive summary • In 2008 the Parliamentary Library published The rise of the Australian Greens which discussed the emergence of environmental politics in Australia, analysed the characteristics of Greens’ voters, and speculated as to whether the Australian Greens party would ever be more than ‘positioned on the edge’ of mainstream politics. • In the 2010 federal election, the Australian Greens emerged with the balance of power in the Senate and shared balance of power in the House of Representatives in the first hung federal parliament in Australia for 70 years. As a result, the ALP entered into an agreement with the Greens in order to secure the party’s commitment to a stable government during the 43rd Commonwealth Parliament. • The increased visibility of the Australian Greens at a national level has generated greater public scrutiny and debate about the implications of the Greens’ policy agenda for Australia, and exposed a lingering confusion about the true ideological nature of the party. • The party has a distinctive political culture and values with a ‘grassroots’ organisational structure reflecting its origins in social and environmental movements and citizen-led activism. • The party’s federal electoral success has also highlighted the way in which the Greens are engaged in a ‘balancing act’, both externally, as a coalition partner with the Labor government and as the balance-of-power party in the Senate, and internally, between the pragmatists and idealists within its membership.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mother of All Effects? Stability and Change in Greens Political Party
    The Mother of All Effects? Stability and Change in Greens Political Party Identification in Australia Bruce Tranter University of Tasmania and Jonathan Smith Monash University Abstract Some of the first young Australians able to inherit Greens party identity are examined, as the Australian Greens only formed as a national party in 1992. Analysis of youth cohort data from the state of Queensland spanning 5 years (n=2,160; aged 17 to 22), shows that parental political affiliation (especially maternal affiliation) strongly influences Greens party identification as it does for the major parties. However, Greens are less likely than major party identifiers to exhibit stable party allegiances over time. Defections between Greens and Labor identifiers are also far more likely than between these parties and conservative parties (Liberals or Nationals). The comparatively recent formation of the Australian Greens accounts for the relative instability of Greens identity over time. Nevertheless, inter- generational transmission of Greens identity should translate into a relatively stable electoral base for the Greens, helping ensure they remain an influential presence in Australian federal politics. Keywords Party identification Green parties Green voting Australia Introduction Identification with the Greens party among young Australians is of particular interest for several reasons. While environmental social movements have been influential in Australia for decades (Hutton and Connors 1999), and the Australian Democrats’ Norm Sanders ‘was the first “green” politician, elected to the Tasmanian parliament in 1980’ (Turnbull and Vromens 2006, 456), the Australian Greens did not form a national political party until 1992.1 As partisan loyalties develop in childhood and early adolescence (Jennings and Niemi 1974), and given the small scale and fragmented nature of green parties across Australia prior to 1992, until very recently, only a small proportion of adult Greens identifiers could have acquired their partisan allegiances from their parents.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FAR-LEFT HISTORY of the AUSTRALIAN GREENS the Greens’ Past Shows They Are a Party of the Radical Left, Not the Environment, Argues Christian Kerr
    THE FAR-LEFT HISTORY OF THE AUSTRALIAN GREENS The Greens’ past shows they are a party of the radical left, not the environment, argues Christian Kerr. THE FAR-LEFT HISTORY OF THE AUSTRALIAN GREENS R Brown was a prominent figure in were joined by three other members— the Wilderness Society from its earliest Christine Milne, Lance Armstrong CHRISTIAN KERR Journalist with The Australian days. He wrote about rafting the and Di Hollister—largely elected in Franklin River in the very first issue protest against a proposed paper pulp of its journal and became the society’s mill at Wesley Vale, outside the north- paradox lies at the very director in 1978, putting him at the eastern centre of Devonport. heart of the Greens. ‘The very forefront of the dam debate. It was during this term of first Green Party anywhere It was an Australian Democrat, parliament that the movement got in the world began in Norm Sanders, who was first elected a name. The Tasmanian Wilderness AAustralia in 1972, the United to the state parliament off the back Society had already spread to the Tasmania Group, which grew out of of the controversy. He became a mainland, dropping the specific state pioneering Australian environmental member for Denison in a by-election reference as its work broadened. campaigns,’ the official creation story early in 1980, the first Australian The growing political organisation on their website reads. ‘Early elections political candidate elected on an found a title too. saw Greens representatives hold the environmental platform. But Brown The title came from the Green balance of power at the state level, very much became the face of the ‘No Ban campaigns in Sydney of the including Bob Brown and Christine Dams’ campaign as it spread beyond early 1970s which had begun after Milne in Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Politics and the Tasmanian Greens
    THE PLACE OF NATURE? ELECTORAL POLITICS AND THE TASMANIAN GREENS Kate Crowley Green politics in Tasmania is very much a politics of place, driven by struggles to save iconic natural areas such as Lake Pedder, the Franklin River, the South West wilderness and more recently the state’s old growth forests and unprotected areas. These struggles have inspired a green politics that is historic, in the sense of inspiring the formation of the world’s first green party, and distinctive for the growing and consolidating of green parliamentary representation. Whilst the rest of the world may be attempting to explain the waxing and waning of green parliamentary politics, in Tasmania the questions that need answers are: why does green parliamentary representation persist and has it reached its limits. This paper focuses on the trajectory of Tasmania’s parliamentary greening, rather than on the green movement’s broader characteristics, disputes and groups. It is a study of recent electoral efforts by the Tasmanian Greens and the counter efforts of anti-green forces. It focuses on the state election in 2006, and argues that there are very clear limits to the place of nature within the state parliament. Whilst the Greens are old hands at gaining parliamentary advantage, in the 2006 election opposing forces used effective tactics to constrain their further success. TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF Greens would again assume the balance of PARLIAMENTARY GREENING power and what demands they would bring Nearly twenty years ago, Australia’s small, to government. A further more academic remote, southern, and relatively wild, state question is whether, after decades in state of Tasmania was described as a crucible of parliament, the Greens are now capable of environmental conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Greens
    .Tasmanian Greens. Organiser(s) POSITION DESCRIPTION POSITION DETAILS Position title: Organiser(s) Roles available: Multiple roles available. Each role will focus on a specific Tasmanian region. Further information will be discussed at interview Primary location: Tasmanian Greens state office, Hobart Tasmanian Greens Bass electorate office, Launceston Status: Fixed contract until one week after the Federal Election Remuneration: Contract rate of $60,000-$66,000pa pro rata with additional 9.5% superannuation Primary hours: Full-time or Part-time, including evening and weekend work Probation: A thirty-day probation period applies Position begins: The week beginning 14th January 2019 Responsible to: This position reports to the Federal Election Campaign Manager This position is offered under the The Australian Greens Industrial Staff Collective Agreement 2018. Agreement ABOUT THE ROLE Are you passionate about caring for Tasmania’s future? Are you interested in community organising? We are looking for organisers – people who can build a team to support our Greens candidates. You will be a real people person, prepared to have meaningful and persuasive conversations with Tasmanian voters during the Greens federal election campaign. You will be implementing four key elements of our election campaign at a local level; (a) volunteer recruitment and care, (b) voter contact coordination, (c) leadership development, and (d) training. This isn’t your average job: you’ll often work weekends and evenings instead of weekdays, and you’ll need to be self-motivated and flexible – but you’ll meet amazing Greens members from all walks of life, and make a real difference to growing the political party that stands up for what matters.
    [Show full text]
  • NT Voluntary Euthanasia Society
    NT Voluntary Euthanasia Society Inc GPO Box 2734 Darwin NT 0801 Patron: Mr Marshall Perron Phone: 8945 1446 President: Mrs Judy Dent No.36 __._,_.___ April 2013 Community Groups and Human Rights Advocates Launch Voluntary Euthanasia Party The Voluntary Euthanasia Party (VEP) brings together civil rights organisations, high profile euthanasia advocates and community supporters to make voluntary euthanasia a central issue at the 14 September Federal election. According to Dr Philip Nitschke of Exit International, “The Voluntary Euthanasia Party has come together at the right time to build on the growing momentum of support within the community and across the political spectrum more broadly.” In 1996 and 1997, Dr Nitschke assisted with the deaths of four terminally ill patients under the Northern Territory’s Rights of the Terminally Ill Act. This compassionate piece of legislation was overturned by the passage of the Euthanasia Laws Bill in Federal Parliament in March 1997. Since then, Exit International and the state and territory Dying with Dignity and VE societies have lobbied for VE law reform. Mr Richard Mills, President of Dying with Dignity NSW and long-term advocate for this cause said, “VEP has a real opportunity to make sure that no candidate is elected in September without addressing our issue.” VEP founder, Corey McCann, said that the party had been created as a means of ensuring that one’s right to a peaceful death is established in law. Australia is signatory to the International Convention on Human Rights. Control over how one dies is fundamental and consistent with human rights domestically and with our obligations internationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Green-Supported Minority Government in Tasmania
    Strained Parliamentary Relations Green-supported minority government in Tasmania Kate Crowley * This article takes Strom’s 1 and Moon’s 2 discussion of minority regimes and explores it in the Tasmanian context by reviewing the Labor–Green Accord (1989–92) and the Liberal–Green Alliance (1996–98) govern- ments. It argues that these Green-supported minority governments in Tasmania, while short-lived and contentious, have had significant positive implications for public policy and the shaping of politics, and for not entirely precluding, in fact for encouraging, reform agendas. Indeed, it is argued that they illustrate Kingdon’s notion of policy windows whereby problems, policies and politics come together at critical times, in times of crisis for instance, and facilitate fundamental policy innovation and change. The article characterises Green minority government in Tasmania, examines the circumstances that led to its creation, acknowledges the ideological strain of Greens partnering government, but concludes that Green minority government offers significant reform opportunities. By considering these two very different governments, this article adds empirical justification to Strom’s and Green–Pedersen’s 3 case that minority governments are far from passive and constrained in terms of governing capacity. * Graduate Coordinator of Public Policy, School of Government, University of Tasmania. Dr Crowley teaches environmental politics and policy. She is widely published on environmental politics and policy, and is co-editor of Australian Environmental Policy: Studies in Decline & Devolution ( with Ken Walker), UNSWPress, Kensington, NSW. 1 K. Strom, Minority Government and Majority Rule , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990. 2 J. Moon ‘Minority Government in the Australian States: From Ersatz Majoritarianism to Minoritarianism’, Australian Journal of Political Science , 31: Special issue on Consensus Policy- Making, 1995, pp.
    [Show full text]