THE FAR-LEFT HISTORY of the AUSTRALIAN GREENS the Greens’ Past Shows They Are a Party of the Radical Left, Not the Environment, Argues Christian Kerr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE FAR-LEFT HISTORY of the AUSTRALIAN GREENS the Greens’ Past Shows They Are a Party of the Radical Left, Not the Environment, Argues Christian Kerr THE FAR-LEFT HISTORY OF THE AUSTRALIAN GREENS The Greens’ past shows they are a party of the radical left, not the environment, argues Christian Kerr. THE FAR-LEFT HISTORY OF THE AUSTRALIAN GREENS R Brown was a prominent figure in were joined by three other members— the Wilderness Society from its earliest Christine Milne, Lance Armstrong CHRISTIAN KERR Journalist with The Australian days. He wrote about rafting the and Di Hollister—largely elected in Franklin River in the very first issue protest against a proposed paper pulp of its journal and became the society’s mill at Wesley Vale, outside the north- paradox lies at the very director in 1978, putting him at the eastern centre of Devonport. heart of the Greens. ‘The very forefront of the dam debate. It was during this term of first Green Party anywhere It was an Australian Democrat, parliament that the movement got in the world began in Norm Sanders, who was first elected a name. The Tasmanian Wilderness AAustralia in 1972, the United to the state parliament off the back Society had already spread to the Tasmania Group, which grew out of of the controversy. He became a mainland, dropping the specific state pioneering Australian environmental member for Denison in a by-election reference as its work broadened. campaigns,’ the official creation story early in 1980, the first Australian The growing political organisation on their website reads. ‘Early elections political candidate elected on an found a title too. saw Greens representatives hold the environmental platform. But Brown The title came from the Green balance of power at the state level, very much became the face of the ‘No Ban campaigns in Sydney of the including Bob Brown and Christine Dams’ campaign as it spread beyond early 1970s which had begun after Milne in Tasmania. In 1992, the Tasmania and mounted as a federal women from the well-heeled suburb Greens formed a national party.’ issue as the 1983 election loomed. of Hunters Hill, rebuffed by the local Not only is this strangely Sanders resigned from the council and Liberal state government, condensed. It omits what appealed to the hard- one would think are details THE GREAT PARADOX OF THE GREENS IS THAT left New South Wales absolutely crucial to the THEIR ORIGINS LIE IN A CAMPAIGN TO FIGHT THE branch of the militant story of the Greens. >DEVELOPMENT OF A SOURCE OF RENEWABLE Builders Labourers Yes, the Greens were ENERGY Federation to stop born from the United local development. Tasmania Group. It itself Jack Mundey, sprang from the Lake Pedder Action parliament at the end of 1982 in the BLF leader, coined the term at group, the body formed to try to protest at what he described as the start of 1973 to differentiate its revoke the removal of national park the ‘totalitarian’ treatment of dam environmentally-focussed actions status and flooding and enlargement protesters by the state government. from the traditional union ‘black bans’. of the south-west Tasmanian lake as More than 1500 had been arrested, The actions spread in 1973 and part of a hydro-electric project in the including Brown. 1974 across different parts of Sydney. late sixties and early seventies. Under Tasmania’s electoral system, The union and activists joined forces The group was created to contest a count back was held to determine to block developments in Potts Point seats at the 1972 Tasmanian election, who would succeed Sanders in and the Rocks, in the Anglican-church as flooding was set to get underway. Denison. The successful candidate owned areas of Glebe, and against It came within a few hundred votes was announced on January 4 1983. a freeway development that would of winning a seat, but its vote declined It was Brown, who the same day had have cut through the inner-western at the next election. Many of its emerged from 19 days in Hobart’s suburbs of Ultimo, Annandale, Rozelle members and other Lake Pedder Risdon Prison for obstructing workers and Leichhardt. activists drifted into the Tasmanian at the Franklin Dam site. The movement impressed a young Wilderness Society in 1976, including Brown had contested Denison visiting German bureaucrat from the the Launceston general practitioner at the 1982 poll as an independent. He European Commission and left-wing Bob Brown. was returned in the 1986 Tasmanian activist, Petra Kelly. She was fascinated The Wilderness Society was election, along with a second by the collaboration between the formed to continue and expand the environmental campaigner from workers of the BLF and the residents work of the Lake Pedder campaign— the neighbouring seat of Franklin, of the bohemian or rapidly gentrifying and harness its energy to stop the Gerry Bates. areas where the Green Ban actions Hydro-Electric Commission’s planned The movement continued to grow occurred. Franklin Dam on the Gordon River in in strength. Both Brown and Bates The name stuck with her and when the state’s rugged south-west. were returned at the 1989 election, and at the start of 1980 she became a key AUGUST 2013 | IPA Review 17 R THE FAR-LEFT HISTORY OF THE AUSTRALIAN GREENS Volume 65 I 2 The Greens woodchip protest AT THE VERY CORE OF THE GREENS’ PHILOSOPHY TODAY IS THAT THE PLANET ITSELF IS FACED BY AN EXISTENTIAL CRISIS THAT CAN ONLY BE RESOLVED BY RADICALLY >REMODELLING NOT JUST THE ECONOMY, BUT SOCIETY ITSELF CONTINUED their symbol while at the same time treaty, they were constitutionally valid driver in an effort to unite groups of adopting a name that attempted to under the Commonwealth’s external environmentalists, peace activists, hide the fact that it actually was a affairs powers. anti-NATO, anti-nuclear and anti- party. Even now the media simply The environmental issues of 2013, industrialisation protesters into a refers to them as the Greens. It however, are very different to those of single movement in a drive for real was telling that the day after Milne 1983. True, some are still fought on a political power and parliamentary discarded her agreement with the case by case, location by location basis. representation in her homeland she government that Julia Gillard, for the But at the very core of the Greens’ bestowed it on the new body. They very first time, referred to them as ‘the philosophy today is that the planet became Die Grünen, the Greens. Greens party’. itself is faced by an existential crisis The emerging political force There was a lack of honesty in its that can only be resolved by radically in Tasmania borrowed back the actions, an ambiguity—an ambiguity remodelling not just the economy, but name. They had originally been ‘the that continues to match the paradox of society itself—and the relationship of Independents’. At the end of 1991 they the party that is so obvious today. both with the ecology. became ‘the Green Independents’. By The 30th anniversary of the election At the heart of that existential August of 1992 they had become ‘the of the Hawke government on March crisis—or at least one of its most Greens’. 5 this year was also heralded by the crucial elements—is the supposed At the same time, the movement Greens as the 30th anniversary of threat of climate change, of global took the green triangular logo that the saving of the Franklin. Hawke warming caused largely by the had been the symbol of the Franklin had promised to block the proposal. production and use of coal to generate protestors, removed the words UNESCO had awarded world the electricity that not only powers ‘No Dams’, and replaced them with the heritage listing status to the wild our industries, but powers—and party name. rivers of Tasmania in December 1982. empowers—our society. It was an act rich in symbolism— The incoming Hawke government The great paradox of the Greens and hypocrisy. The anti-Franklin went on to introduce legislation is that their origins lie in a campaign protests, like the protests against to stop work on the Franklin Dam to fight the development of a source the flooding of Lake Pedder before and successfully defending its acts of renewable energy, hydro-electrical them, had been community-based against a High Court challenge by power, that their great day of social movements. Tasmania, saying that as they dealt celebration marked the effective end A political party had appropriated with a listing under an international of the push to develop this cheap and 18 IPA Review | ipa.org.au THE FAR-LEFT HISTORY OF THE AUSTRALIAN GREENS R carbon-neutral means of powering the movement, opponents of the two Gulf from 1990. Tasmanian economy. Wars and involvement in Afghanistan, Valentine cited the Quakers and Nothing was said about this on anti-urban development activists, the the Vietnam Moratorium movement March 5 by this supposed party of the women’s and gay rights movements, as keys to her activism. While a environment. It is a fact that simply animal activists, the community legal parliamentarian, she was arrested cannot be acknowledged by any centres movement, opponents of coal protesting outside the Australian/ member. This dark, guilty secret, the seam gas, opponents of genetically US joint facility at Pine Gap. She also party’s very own original sin, is kept modified organisms… the list goes on. marched against the American Clark absolutely hidden. Which begs the Their former national convenor, Air Base in the Philippines. question: what else do the Greens have Stewart Jackson, said in his doctoral She resigned citing ill health in to hide? thesis ‘the Australian Greens has a March 1992 (while continuing active The Lake Pedder and Franklin complex history, bringing together a involvement in various anti-American, Dam struggles are central to the number of different strands of social anti-uranium, anti-nuclear and Greens mythos.
Recommended publications
  • Recorder 298.Pages
    RECORDER RecorderOfficial newsletter of the Melbourne Labour History Society (ISSN 0155-8722) Issue No. 298—July 2020 • From Sicily to St Lucia (Review), Ken Mansell, pp. 9-10 IN THIS EDITION: • Oil under Troubled Water (Review), by Michael Leach, pp. 10-11 • Extreme and Dangerous (Review), by Phillip Deery, p. 1 • The Yalta Conference (Review), by Laurence W Maher, pp. 11-12 • The Fatal Lure of Politics (Review), Verity Burgmann, p. 2 • The Boys Who Said NO!, p. 12 • Becoming John Curtin and James Scullin (Review), by Nick Dyrenfurth, pp. 3-4 • NIBS Online, p. 12 • Dorothy Day in Australia, p. 4 • Union Education History Project, by Max Ogden, p. 12 • Tribute to Jack Mundey, by Verity Burgmann, pp. 5-6 • Graham Berry, Democratic Adventurer, p. 12 • Vale Jack Mundey, by Brian Smiddy, p. 7 • Tribune Photographs Online, p. 12 • Batman By-Election, 1962, by Carolyn Allan Smart & Lyle Allan, pp. 7-8 • Melbourne Branch Contacts, p. 12 • Without Bosses (Review), by Brendan McGloin, p. 8 Extreme and Dangerous: The Curious Case of Dr Ian Macdonald Phillip Deery His case parallels that of another medical doctor, Paul Reuben James, who was dismissed by the Department of Although there are numerous memoirs of British and Repatriation in 1950 for opposing the Communist Party American communists written by their children, Dissolution Bill. James was attached to the Reserve Australian communists have attracted far fewer Officers of Command and, to the consternation of ASIO, accounts. We have Ric Throssell’s Wild Weeds and would most certainly have been mobilised for active Wildflowers: The Life and Letters of Katherine Susannah military service were World War III to eventuate, as Pritchard, Roger Milliss’ Serpent’s Tooth, Mark Aarons’ many believed.
    [Show full text]
  • MAC1 Abstracts – Oral Presentations
    Oral Presentation Abstracts OP001 Rights, Interests and Moral Standing: a critical examination of dialogue between Regan and Frey. Rebekah Humphreys Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom This paper aims to assess R. G. Frey’s analysis of Leonard Nelson’s argument (that links interests to rights). Frey argues that claims that animals have rights or interests have not been established. Frey’s contentions that animals have not been shown to have rights nor interests will be discussed in turn, but the main focus will be on Frey’s claim that animals have not been shown to have interests. One way Frey analyses this latter claim is by considering H. J. McCloskey’s denial of the claim and Tom Regan’s criticism of this denial. While Frey’s position on animal interests does not depend on McCloskey’s views, he believes that a consideration of McCloskey’s views will reveal that Nelson’s argument (linking interests to rights) has not been established as sound. My discussion (of Frey’s scrutiny of Nelson’s argument) will centre only on the dialogue between Regan and Frey in respect of McCloskey’s argument. OP002 Can Special Relations Ground the Privileged Moral Status of Humans Over Animals? Robert Jones California State University, Chico, United States Much contemporary philosophical work regarding the moral considerability of nonhuman animals involves the search for some set of characteristics or properties that nonhuman animals possess sufficient for their robust membership in the sphere of things morally considerable. The most common strategy has been to identify some set of properties intrinsic to the animals themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian Democrats Andrew Bartlett*
    Australian Cultural History Vol. 27, No.2, October 2009, 187-193 The Australian Democrats Andrew Bartlett* The Australian Democrats had maintained a presence in the Senate since 1977, but the 2007 election threatened to end their representation for good. Their efforts to retain seats proved to be in vain. Keywords: 2007 election; Australian Democrats; Senate Following on from the 2004 election, where the Australian Democrats lost four seats (including the Democrat seat Meg Lees had taken with her when she resigned from the party in 2002), plus official parliamentary status and balance of power in the Senate, the Party faced a very difficult task in the 2007 election trying to keep its four remaining Senate seats. Right throughout John Howard's fourth term, opinion polls showed public support for the Democrats consistently scraping along rock bottom levels of 1 or 2 per cent, as they had ever since the Lees resignation and the related public implosion of Natasha Stott Despoja's leadership in 2002. Even though the removal of the Democrats from the balance of power after the 2004 poll led directly to the Coalition government gaining control of the Senate, where it frequently used its majority to stifle scrutiny and bulldoze through some controversial legislation, the Democrats were unable to use this situation to build public support for returning the Party to its traditional Senate watchdog position. The Party had avoided going into debt in its 2004 campaign, so there were sufficient funds to run a basic campaign in priority areas for the 2007 election. However, serious use of paid advertising was not feasible.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence on the U.S. Environmental Movement
    Australian Journal of Politics and History: Volume 61, Number 3, 2015, pp.414-431. Exemplars and Influences: Transnational Flows in the Environmental Movement CHRISTOPHER ROOTES Centre for the Study of Social and Political Movements, School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK Transnational flows of ideas are examined through consideration of Green parties, Friends of the Earth, and Earth First!, which represent, respectively, the highly institutionalised, the semi- institutionalised and the resolutely non-institutionalised dimensions of environmental activism. The focus is upon English-speaking countries: US, UK and Australia. Particular attention is paid to Australian cases, both as transmitters and recipients of examples. The influence of Australian examples on Europeans has been overstated in the case of Green parties, was negligible in the case of Friends of the Earth, but surprisingly considerable in the case of Earth First!. Non-violent direct action in Australian rainforests influenced Earth First! in both the US and UK. In each case, the flow of influence was mediated by individuals, and outcomes were shaped by the contexts of the recipients. Introduction Ideas travel. But they do not always travel in straight lines. The people who are their bearers are rarely single-minded; rather, they carry and sometimes transmit all sorts of other ideas that are in varying ways and to varying degrees discrepant one with another. Because the people who carry and transmit them are in different ways connected to various, sometimes overlapping, sometimes discrete social networks, ideas are not only transmitted in variants of their pure, original form, but they become, in these diverse transmuted forms, instantiated in social practices that are embedded in differing institutional contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambassade De France En Australie – Service De Presse Et Information Site : Tél
    Online Press review 7 May 2015 The articles in purple are not available online. Please contact the Press and Information Department. FRONT PAGE New Greens leaders seek ‘common ground’ on reform (AUS) Crowe The Greens are promising a fresh look at major budget savings after the sudden installation of Richard Di Natale as the party’s new leader signalled a dramatic shift in power to a new generation but stirred internal rancour. Get over historical indigenous wrongs: Noel Pearson (AUS) Bita Aboriginal leader Noel Pearson has challenged indigenous Australians to get over their traumatic history in the same way that Jews survived the Holocaust. Federal budget 2015: GST on Netflix and more on the way (CAN+SMH) Martin The federal government will move to impose the goods and services tax on services such as Netflix under new rules set to be included in next week's budget. Federal budget 2015: Census saved, $250m investment in Bureau of Statistics (CAN) Martin The census has been saved and the Australian Bureau of Statistics will get a $250 million funding boost as part of the biggest technology upgrade in its 110-year history. DOMESTIC AFFAIRS POLITICS Abbott rejects slur on Paris meeting as Fairfax Media slammed (AUS) Owens Tony Abbott has denied knowing that ambassador Stephen Brady’s male partner had been instructed to leave the tarmac of a Paris airport before the Prime Minister’s arrival on Anzac Day. Smearing Tony Abbott as a homophobe is victory for hatred (AUS/Comment) Kenny Given Tony Abbott has been dubbed a misogynist, Islamophobe and racist, I suppose the - occasional allegation of homophobia shouldn’t be a surprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Reclink Annual Report 2017-18
    , Annual Report 2017-18 Partners Our Mission Respond. Rebuild. Reconnect. We seek to give all participants the power of purpose. About Reclink Australia Reclink Australia is a not-for-profit organisation whose aim is to enhance the lives of people experiencing disadvantage or facing significant barriers to participation, through providing new and unique sports, specialist recreation and arts programs, and pathways to employment opportunities. We target some of the community’s most vulnerable and isolated people; at risk youth, those experiencing mental illness, people with a disability, the homeless, people tackling alcohol and other drug issues and social and economic hardship. As part of our unique hub and spoke network model, Reclink Australia has facilitated cooperative partnerships with a membership of more than 290 community, government and private organisations. Our member agencies are committed to encouraging our target population group, under-represented in mainstream sport and recreational programs, to take that step towards improved health and self-esteem, and use Reclink Australia’s activities as a means of engagement for hard to reach population groups. Contents Our Mission 3 State Reports 11 About Reclink Australia 3 AAA Play 20 Why We Exist 4 Reclink India 22 What We Do 5 Art Therapy 23 Delivering Evidence-based Programs 6 Events, Fundraising and Volunteers 24 Transformational Links, Training Our Activities 32 and Education 7 Our Members 34 Corporate Governance 7 Gratitude 36 Founder’s Message 8 Our National Footprint 38 Improving Lives and Reducing Crime 9 Reclink Australia Staff 39 Community Partners 10 Contact Us 39 Notice of 2017 Annual General Meeting The Annual General Meeting for Members 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Movements and Political Parties: Conflicts and Balance1
    Social movements and political parties: conflicts and balance1 Lee Rhiannon Abstract The paper addresses aspects of the relationship between political parties and social movements, with a focus on the Australian Greens. It posits some of the limitations and possibilities of this relationship, arguing that it is a necessary one, both to social movements seeking to pursue their agendas through the political system, and to political parties needing to be open to broad public participation and to maintain strong links to on-the-ground issues. It concludes that the Australian Greens have sought to strike a balance between party and movement, recognising the limits of both. Introduction For much of the 19th and 20th centuries the Left was renowned for being strong on organisation while the conservative side of politics relied on money and media dominance to advance their causes. The term "organising" is not used here to mean "well organised" in progressive politics, organising is about a commitment to involve and empower people through democratic decision-making. The term organising in Left politics embodies the society that is strived-for (see Alinsky 1971; Bobo et al 2001). Organising as a tool for building democratic structures and taking the message to a wider audience is at the core of progressive movements and political parties (Bronfenbrenner 1998; Doyle 2001). Without that commitment, focussed campaigns and progressive political parties will fail to bring about the far-reaching structural changes required to build a society free of exploitation of people and the environment (Kovel 2007; Panitch 2007). While right wing commentators and conservative politicians abuse the Left for a lack of democracy – and there have been dictators, big and small – a deep commitment to participatory democracy has characterised most progressive movements and political parties (see Maddison and Hamilton 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • August 5, 1976 / 3W *
    August 5, 1976 / 3W * PEACE AND FREEDOM THRUI NONVIOLENT ACT¡ON Seeking a Human Perspective on Housing How the'Vietnam War lsn't Over for Somã People Bird-Brained Schemes in the Pentagon Are Alternative lnstitutions the Way to Social Change? August Ir The 31st Anniversary of Hiroshima; For observances, see Events, page 17 1. \ ¡.ç "dltfiþ't'* *---lr^ ,qsl{r^-.{¡se***, å{-!¡t- ,l I am convinced that his present she cites show that he is not a pacifist, .¡ detention by the Lee Kuan Yew govern- perhdps) but they say nothing about the ment is for punitive reasons and NAEP. fgpPression of politicians who oppose 2) The WA\{-WSO is fïlled with hrs government. people who were in defense work. Just I appeal to all peace loving people all because a person once did defense work over the world to-once again help does not mean that hej or she only.does achieve the release not õnly ofmy evil thingb. husband Dr. Poh Soo Kai, but aliother 3) Iknow very little about the BECOMING REAI political prisoners such as Dr. Lim Hock world, but I doubt business that sub- are two ways, in thè stories at least. Siew, Said Zahari, Ho Piow and manv sidiaries of large corporations have their There others who have been in prison for m'ore first is like Pinocchio, and l've done it, projects.dictated to them by their þarent The than 13 years. I demand the PAP companies, or that the parent Through good works, and self-denial, and an enterpr¡s¡ng governrñent allow my husband to to companies have total access to the Conscience, and the only reward ' August 5,1976 l,Yol, Xll, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Senator Bob Brown - Australian Greens
    Senator Bob Brown - Australian Greens Bob Brown, born in 1944, was educated in rural New South Wales, became captain of Blacktown Boys High School in Sydney and graduated in medicine from Sydney University in 1968. He became the Director of the Wilderness Society which organised the blockade of the dam-works on Tasmania’s wild Franklin River in 1982/3. Some 1500 people were arrested and 600 jailed, including Bob Brown who spent 19 days in Risdon Prison. On the day of his release, he was elected as the first Green into Tasmania's Parliament. After federal government intervention, the Franklin River was protected in 1983. As a State MP, Bob Brown introduced a wide range of private member's initiatives, including for freedom of information, death with dignity, lowering parliamentary salaries, gay law reform, banning the battery-hen industry and nuclear free Tasmania. Some succeeded, others not. Regrettably, his 1987 bill to ban semi-automatic guns was voted down by both Liberal and Labor members of the House of Assembly, seven years before the Port Arthur massacre. In 1989, he led the parliamentary team of five Greens which held the balance of power with the Field Labor Government. The Greens saved 25 schools from closure, instigated the Local Employment Initiatives which created more than 1000 jobs in depressed areas, doubled the size of Tasmania's Wilderness World Heritage Area to 1.4 million hectares, created the Douglas-Apsley National Park and supported tough fiscal measures to recover from the debts of the previous Liberal regime. Bob resigned from the State Parliament in 1993 and Christine Milne took over as leader of the Tasmanian Greens.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charter and Constitution of the Australian Greens May 2020 Charter
    The Charter and Constitution of the Australian Greens May 2020 Charter .......................................................................................................................................................................3 Basis of The Charter ..............................................................................................................................................3 Ecology ..................................................................................................................................................................3 Democracy.............................................................................................................................................................3 Social Justice .........................................................................................................................................................3 Peace ....................................................................................................................................................................3 An Ecologically Sustainable Economy ....................................................................................................................4 Meaningful Work ....................................................................................................................................................4 Culture ...................................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Whitlam's Children? Labor and the Greens in Australia (2007-2013
    Whitlam’s Children? Labor and the Greens in Australia (2007-2013) Shaun Crowe A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Australian National University March 2017 © Shaun Crowe, 2017 1 The work presented in this dissertation is original, to the best of my knowledge and belief, except as acknowledged in the text. The material has not been submitted, in whole or in part, for a degree at The Australian National University or any other university. This research is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship. 2 Acknowledgments Before starting, I was told that completing a doctoral thesis was rewarding and brutal. Having now written one, these both seem equally true. Like all PhD students, I never would have reached this point without the presence, affirmation and help of the people around me. The first thanks go to Professor John Uhr. Four and half years on, I’m so lucky to have stumbled into your mentorship. With such a busy job, I don’t know how you find the space to be so generous, both intellectually and with your time. Your prompt, at times cryptic, though always insightful feedback helped at every stage of the process. Even more useful were the long and digressive conversations in your office, covering the world between politics and philosophy. I hope they continue. The second round of thanks go to the people who aided me at different points. Thanks to Guy Ragen, Dr Jen Rayner and Alice Workman for helping me source interviews. Thanks to Emily Millane, Will Atkinson, Dr Lizzy Watt, and Paul Karp for editing chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Given by Andrew John Bartlett and Anthony James Pink
    UNCLASSIFIED Copy 1 of 1 CRIME AND CORRUPTION COMMISSION TRANSCRIPT OF INVESTIGATIVE HEARING 10 CONDUCTED AT LEVEL 2, NORTH TOWER, 515 ST PAULS TERRACE, FORTITUDE VALLEY WITH RESPECT TO File No: CO-16-1664 HEARING NO: 17/0001 DAY 7 – FRIDAY 28 APRIL 2017 (DURATION: 45MINS) 20 Copies of this transcript must not be made or distributed except in accordance with any order made by the presiding officer concerning publication of these proceedings. LEGEND PO Presiding Officer – ALAN MACSPORRAN QC CA Counsel Assisting – GLEN RICE QC 30 HRO Hearing Room Orderly – MELISSA LETONDEUR W1 Witness – ANDREW BARTLETT W2 Witness – ANTHONY PINK LR Legal Representative – N/A EVIDENCE GIVEN BY A BARTLETT/A PINK Page 1 of 16 Transcriber: TH/KR (DTI) File No. CO-16-1664 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Copy 1 of 1 HRO This hearing is resumed. PO Yes, Mr RICE. CA Commissioner, it is proposed to call representatives of the Queensland Greens. In this instance, there are actually two, Mr Andrew BARTLETT and Mr Anthony PINK. They wish, as I understand it, to give their evidence together. I call those two gentlemen. 10 PO Thank you. CA Mr BARTLETT is on your right, Mr Commissioner. PO Mr BARTLETT and Mr PINK, do either of you have an objection to taking an oath on the Bible? W2 I might. Sorry. 20 PO An affirmation? W2 An affirmation will be fine. PO All right. I will have Mr Bartlett sworn in, and I will have you affirm through the Orderly, thanks. W2 I solemnly affirm and declare that the evidence given by me in these proceedings shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
    [Show full text]