DOCSLIB.ORG

Further Records of Hoverfly Species (Diptera, Syrphidae) in Norway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Further Records of Hoverfly Species (Diptera, Syrphidae) in Norway © Norwegian Journal of Entomology. 14 May 2008 Further records of Hoverfly species (Diptera, Syrphidae) in Norway Øivind Gammelmo & Tore R. Nielsen Gammelmo, Ø. & Nielsen, T.R. 2008. Further records of Hoverfly species (Diptera, Syrphidae) in Norway. Norw. J. Entomol. 55, 19–23.–23. A hoverfly material, mainly from the collections of Natural History Museum Oslo, is published. Three species, Epistrophe olgae Mutin, 1993, Xanthogramma stackelbergi Violovitsh, 1975 and Xylota ignava (Panzer, 1798) are reported new to the Norwegian fauna, and there is also a second record of Temnostoma sericomyiaeforme (Portschinsky, 1887). Key words: Diptera, Syrphidae, new records, Norway. Øivind Gammelmo, BioFokus, Gaustadalléen 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Tore R. Nielsen, Sandvedhagen 8, NO-4318 Sandnes, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION THE SPECIES The Norwegian hoverfly fauna was revised and The paper reports on new material of rare or less summarized in a check list by Nielsen (1999), common species, mainly from the Natural History followed by two supplementary lists (Nielsen Museum Oslo (NHMO). 2002, 2005). In addition several publications dealing with the Norwegian hoverfly fauna has Codes: * (new to Norway). Red List codes: DD been published since 1999; Falck 1999, Nielsen (Data Deficient), EN (Endangered), NT (Near 2003, Lønnve & Nielsen 2003, Gammelmo & Threatened), VU (Vulnerable). Abbreviations Aarvik 2007. for counties: Ø (Østfold); AK (Akershus); HE (Hedmark); O (Oppland); B (Buskerud); VE Records of each species include the EIS-grid (Vestfold); TE (Telemark); AA (Aust-Agder); VA number, based on 50 × 50 km squares (Endrestøl (Vest-Agder); R (Rogaland); HO (Hordaland); 2005). Regional abbreviations are identical to SF (Sogn og Fjordane); MR (Møre og Romsdal); those given by Økland (1981). ST (Sør-Trøndelag); NT (Nord-Trøndelag); N (Nordland); TR (Troms), F (Finnmark). Hoverflies were surveyed for the 2006 Norwegian Abbreviations of subdivisions: I (interior); Y Red List (Kålås et al. 2006). A total of 963 species (coastal); S (southern); N (northern); V (western); of Diptera were evaluated for listing, of which Ø (eastern). Collections: TRN (Tore Randulff 564 species were chosen for detailed red List Nielsen (private)). assessment (Gammelmo et al. 2006). In all, there are 233 species of Diptera on the 2006 Red List, EN Arctophila bombiformis (Fallén, 1810) of which 62 are hoverflies. OS, Lunner: Grindvoll (EIS 36) 4 July 1985, 1♂, and Grindvoll, Vestern 3–6 July 2006, 1♀, both Gammelmo & Nielsen: Further records of hoverflies in Norway leg. O. Lønnve. Cheilosia sootryeni Nielsen, 1970 Note: Large conspicuous species. Second record HES, Kongsvinger: Abborhøgda (EIS 38) 26 in Norway since 1988. All records are from forest May–22 June 2003, 1♀, Malaise trap, leg. K. habitats in eastern Norway. Redlisted (EN) due to Sund. habitat fragmentation and destruction (Gammelmo et al. 2006). Cheilosia velutina Loew, 1840 AK, Rygge: Sildebauen (EIS 19) 24 July 2005, Blera fallax (Linnaeus, 1758) 1♀, leg. L. Aarvik; Ø, Hvaler: Kjerkøy, Ørekroken TEI, Seljord: Svartdal, Lien Midtre (EIS 26) 26 (EIS 12) 16 July–15 August 2003, 3♂♂3♀♀, June 2005, 1♂, leg. Ø. Gammelmo; Tinn: Spjeldset Malaise trap, leg. L.O. Hansen. (EIS 27) 16 July 2005, 2♂♂, leg. O. Lønnve; HES, Kongsvinger: Dragonmoen (EIS 27) 28 May–22 DD Cheilosia vulpina (Meigen, 1822) June 2005, 1♂2♀♀, leg. K. Sund. AK, Oslo: Bygdøy, Hengsenga (EIS 28) 9 June 2006, 1♂2♀♀, sweep net, leg. Ø. Gammelmo. Brachyopa testacea (Fallén, 1817) Note: In Norway only known from this locality HES, Kongsvinger: Abborhøgda (EIS 38) 26 (Nielsen, 1999). Gammelmo et al. (2006) red May–22 June 2003 1♂ Malaisetrap, leg. K. Sund. listed this species due to lack of knowledge. EN Callicera aenea (Fabricius, 1781) Chrysotoxum cautum (Harris, 1776) AK, Bærum: Kjaglidalen (EIS 28) 10 June 2006, AK, Oslo: Bygdøy, Hengsenga (EIS 28) 9 June 1♀, leg. Ø. Gammelmo. 2006, 1♀, leg. Ø. Gammelmo; Ø, Hvaler: Kjerkøy, Note: Redlisted (EN) based on two records from Ørekroken (EIS 12) 22 June–16 July 2003, 1♀, southern Norway (VAY, TEY) (Gammelmo et al. Malaise trap, leg. L.O. Hansen. 2006). EN Chrysotoxum vernale Loew, 1841 Chalcosyrphus valgus (Gmelin, 1790) Ø, Hvaler: Kjerkøy, Ørekroken (EIS 12) 16 Ø, Fredrikstad: Slevik (EIS 20) 21 June 2003, 1 ♂, July–16 August 2003, 1♀, Malaise trap, leg. L.O. leg. O. Lønnve; HES, Kongsvinger: Abborhøgda Hansen; AK, Oslo: Bygdøy, Hengsenga (EIS (EIS 38) 26 May–22 June, 2003, 5♂♂3♀♀, leg. 28) 9 June 2006, 1♀, leg. Ø. Gammelmo; BØ, K. Sund; TRI, Målselv: Dividalen, Høgskardhus Modum: Vestre Spone, Verksted (EIS 28), Malaise (EIS 147) 26 June 2005, 1♀ leg. E. Heibo. trap, May–September 2004, 1♀, sandy slope, pine forest, leg. O.K. Hesthagen & L.O. Hansen. Chamaeasyrphus scaevoides (Fallén, Note: Redlisted (EN) based on scattered records 1817) in southeastern Norway (VAY, TEY, VE, AK) AK, Oslo: Hovedøya (EIS 28) 29 June–21 July (Gammelmo et al. 2006). 2005, 1♀ in Malaise trap, leg. Ø. Gammelmo & O. Lønnve; BØ, Nedre Eiker: Mjøndalen, Hagatjern, EN Criorhina ranunculi (Panzer, 1804) Ryggsetra (EIS 28) July 1994, 1♀ in Malaise trap, BØ, Modum: Buskerud landbrukshøgskole (EIS leg. V. Berg & L.O. Hansen. 28), May–June 2003, 1♀, Malaisetrap, leg. A. Eikeland. Cheilosia carbonaria Egger, 1860 Note: Redlisted (EN) based on scattered records ON, Vang: Øye, Hole (EIS 52) 30 June 2003, in south Norway (RY, VAY, VE) (Gammelmo et 2♂♂, leg. L. Aarvik. al. 2006). Cheilosia morio (Zetterstedt, 1838) Didea alneti (Fallén, 1817) AK, Frogn: Bonn (EIS 28) 11 May 2006, 1♀, leg. AAY, Birkenes: Nordåsen (EIS 6) August 2005, O. Lønnve. 1♂, leg. S. Svendsen; HES, Kongsvinger: Abborhøgda (EIS 38) 26 May–22 June 2003, 1♀, 0 Norw. J. Entomol. 55, 19–23 Malaise trap, leg. K. Sund. leg. O. Sørlibråten; HES, Kongsvinger: Møkeren, Tråssholmen (EIS 38) 23 June 2001, 1♀, leg. K. Didea fasciata Macquart, 1834 Sund. HES, Kongsvinger: Abborhøgda (EIS 38) 10–20 July 2003, 1♀, Malaise trap, leg. K. Sund. Eristalis pseudorupium Kanervo, 1938 Ø, Rygge: Sildebauen (EIS 19) 14 June 2003, 1♂; Didea intermedia Loew, 1854 AK, Ås: Rustad (EIS 28) 1 June 2003, 1♂; HES, HES, Kongsvinger: Abborhøgda (EIS 38) 10–20 Eidskog: Linkjølen (EIS 38) 22 June 2003, 1♂, all July 2003, 1♀, Malaise trap, leg. K. Sund. leg. L. Aarvik, all in coll. NHMO. Epistrophe obscuripes (Strobl, 1909) DD Lejogaster tarsata (Meigen, 1822) AK, Oslo: Hovedøya (EIS 28) June 2005, 1♂, HES, Kongsvinger: Abborhøgda (EIS 38) 10–20 leg. Ø. Gammelmo. July 2003, 1♀ in Malaise trap, leg. K. Sund; Eidskog: Linkjølen (EIS 38) 22 June 2003, 1♀, * Epistrophe olgae Mutin, 1993 leg. L. Aarvik. HOY, Bergen: Paradis (EIS 30) 21 May 1972, Note: Previously reported from AK, Oslo, EIS 1♂1♀; Åstveit (EIS 39), 2♂♂, leg. T.R. Nielsen, 28 (Falck, 1999). Redlisted (DD) based on two coll. TRN. records from one locality in eastern Norway (AK) Note: Described from eastern Russia and recently (Gammelmo et al. 2006). published from Finland (Haarto & Kerppola 2007). Very similar to E. nitidicollis (Meigen, 1822) and Lejota ruficornis (Zetterstedt, 1843) therefore probably an overlooked species with a VE, Andebu: Bjørnevatnet (EIS 19) 13 July 1996, wider distribution. 1♂, leg. A. Fjellberg; TEI, Seljord: Svartdal, Lien (EIS 26) 1♂, leg. L. Aarvik. Eriozona syrphoides (Fallén, 1817) Ø, Råde: Vannsjø, Langøya (EIS 20) 17 September Leucozona inopinata Doczkal, 2000 2005, 1♀ leg. O. Lønnve; OS, Lunner: Gruakollen AK, Nesodden: Nesodden kirke (EIS 28) 11 June (EIS 36) 28 July 2005, 2♂♂, leg. Ø. Gammelmo; 2006, 1♂, leg. O. Lønnve; HES, Kongsvinger: HES, Kongsvinger: Trossholmen (EIS 38) July Abborhøgda (EIS 38) 29 July–10 August 2003, 2002, 1♀, K. Sund. 1♀, Malaise trap, leg. K. Sund. Eristalis oestracea (Linnaeus, 1758) Melangyna coei Nielsen, 1971 AK, Oslo: Østensjøvann (EIS 28) 25 May 2005, MRI, Norddal: Tafjord, Øynaskredet (EIS 69) 24 1♀; Fet, Borgen (EIS 29) 17 July 1986, 1♀; AAY, June 1994, 1♂, leg. T. Nagypal. Tvedestrand: Sandøya (EIS 6) 2 August 1998, 1♀; FØ, Sør-Varanger: Nedregård (EIS 169) 7 July Melangyna lucifera Nielsen, 1980 1997, 1♀, all leg. M. Falck, all in coll. NHMO; Ø, Rygge: Sildebauen (EIS 19) 7 May 2006, 1♀, TEI, Tinn: Hovin, Spjeldset (EIS 27) 21 July leg. L. Aarvik. 2004, 1♀, leg. O. Lønnve. EN Orthonevra intermedia Lundbeck, Eristalis picea (Fallén, 1817) 1916 Ø, Fredrikstad: Slevik, Ramseklovene (EIS 20) OS, Gjøvik: Bråstad, Koltjernet (EIS 45), 1♂1♀, 27 June 2005, 1♂ on flowers of Aegopodium leg. and det. L. Aarvik. podagraria, leg. O. Lønnve; Rygge: Sildebauen Note: Redlisted (EN) based on records from (EIS 19) 14 May 2005, 1♂, leg L. Aarvik; AK, three localities in south Norway (VAY, AK, Ø) Bærum: Høvik (EIS 28) 1♀; Ås: Bjørnebekk (EIS (Gammelmo et al. 2006). 28) 17 May 2003, 1♂, leg. L. Aarvik; Sørum: Sørliløkka, Dammyra (EIS 37) 27 May 2001, 1♂, Gammelmo & Nielsen: Further records of hoverflies in Norway EN Orthonevra stackelbergi Thompson & 17) 15 July–15 Sept. 1999, 1♀ in Malaise trap, Torp, 1982 leg. L.O. Hansen & D. Wisland. HES, Eidskog: Linkjølen (EIS 38) 8 July 2005, Note: Redlisted (EN) based on records in eastern 1♂, leg. Ø. Gammelmo. Norway (VE, AK, BØ) (Gammelmo et al. 2006). Note: Redlisted (EN) based on records from scattered localities in South Norway (RY, AK, DD Temnostoma sericomyiaeforme HES) (Gammelmo et al. 2006). (Portschinsky, 1887) AK, Nesodden: Skoklefall (EIS 28) 27 June–9 Paragus finitimus Goeldlin, 1971 July 2005, 1♂, Malaise trap, O. Lønnve. Ø, Hvaler: Kjerkøy, Ørekroken (EIS 12) 22 June– Note: This is the second Norwegian record of this 16 July 2003, 1♂2♀♀, Malaise trap, leg. L.O. eastern species (Nielsen, 2005). Redlisted (DD) Hansen. based on one record from Vest-Agder county (VAY) (Gammelmo et al. 2006). Platycheirus europaeus Goeldlin, Maibach & Speight, 1990 Trichopsomyia flavitarsis (Meigen, 1822) TEI, Tinn: Hovin, Spjeldset (EIS 27) 11 July VE, Tjøme: Moutstranda (EIS 19) 8 July 1983, 2005, 1♀, leg.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kartlegging Av Naturverdier På Løkeneshalvøya I Asker Kommune
    6 Kartleggingav naturverdier på Løkeneshalvøya i Askerkommune Odd EgilStabbetorp DagSvalastdg LarsErikstad C NINA.NIKU NINANorsk institutt for naturforskning Kartleggingavnaturverdier på Løkeneshalvøya i Askerkommune OddEgilStabbetorp DagSvalastog LarsErikstad NINANorskinstituttfornaturforskning nina oppdragsmelding642 Stabbetorp, 0. E., Svalastog, D. & Erikstad, L. 2000. Kartlegging av NINA•NIKUs publikasjoner naturverdier på Løkeneshalvøya i Asker kommune. —NINA Opp- dragsmelding 642: 1-29. NINA•NIKU utgir følgende faste publikasjoner: Oslo, januar 1999 NINA Fagrapport NIKU Fagrapport ISSN0802-4103 Her publiseres resultater av NINAs og NIKUs eget forskningsar- ISBN 82-426-1126-2 beid, problemoversikter, kartlegging av kunnskapsnivået innen et emne, og litteraturstudier. Rapporter utgis også som et alter- Rettighetshaver e: nativ eller et supplement til internasjonal publisering, der tids- NINA•NIKU Stiftelsen for naturforskning aspekt, materialets art, målgruppe m.m. gjør dette nødvendig. og kulturminneforskning Opplag: Normalt 300-500 Publikasjonen kan siteres fritt med kildeangivelse NINA Oppdragsmelding NIKU Oppdragsmelding Dette er det minimum av rapportering som NINA og NIKU gir til oppdragsgiver etter fullført forsknings- eller utredningsprosjekt. I tillegg til de emner som dekkes av fagrapportene, vil oppdrags- meldingene også omfatte befaringsrapporter, seminar- og kon- feranseforedrag, årsrapporter fra overvåkningsprogrammer, o.a. Opplaget er begrenset. (Normalt 50-100) NINAsNIKU Project-Report Serien presenter resultater fra
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Resource Choice of Flower-Visiting Insects in Relation to Pollen Nutritional Quality and Land Use
    Diversity and resource choice of flower-visiting insects in relation to pollen nutritional quality and land use Diversität und Ressourcennutzung Blüten besuchender Insekten in Abhängigkeit von Pollenqualität und Landnutzung Vom Fachbereich Biologie der Technischen Universität Darmstadt zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doctor rerum naturalium genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl. Biologin Christiane Natalie Weiner aus Köln Berichterstatter (1. Referent): Prof. Dr. Nico Blüthgen Mitberichterstatter (2. Referent): Prof. Dr. Andreas Jürgens Tag der Einreichung: 26.02.2016 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29.04.2016 Darmstadt 2016 D17 2 Ehrenwörtliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit ehrenwörtlich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit entsprechend den Regeln guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis selbständig und ohne unzulässige Hilfe Dritter angefertigt habe. Sämtliche aus fremden Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Gedanken sowie sämtliche von Anderen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Daten, Techniken und Materialien sind als solche kenntlich gemacht. Die Arbeit wurde bisher keiner anderen Hochschule zu Prüfungszwecken eingereicht. Osterholz-Scharmbeck, den 24.02.2016 3 4 My doctoral thesis is based on the following manuscripts: Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2011): Land-use intensity in grasslands: changes in biodiversity, species composition and specialization in flower-visitor networks. Basic and Applied Ecology 12 (4), 292-299. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2014): Land-use impacts on plant-pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines. Ecology 95, 466–474. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M , Blüthgen, N. (in prep.): Land-use intensification triggers diversity loss in pollination networks: Regional distinctions between three different German bioregions Weiner, C.N., Hilpert, A., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoverfly (Diptera: Syrphidae) Richness and Abundance Vary with Forest Stand Heterogeneity: Preliminary Evidence from a Montane Beech Fir Forest
    Eur. J. Entomol. 112(4): 755–769, 2015 doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.083 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Hoverfly (Diptera: Syrphidae) richness and abundance vary with forest stand heterogeneity: Preliminary evidence from a montane beech fir forest LAURENT LARRIEU 1, 2, ALAIN CABANETTES 1 and JEAN-PIERRE SARTHOU 3, 4 1 INRA, UMR1201 DYNAFOR, Chemin de Borde Rouge, Auzeville Tolosane, CS 52627, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] ² CNPF/ IDF, Antenne de Toulouse, 7 chemin de la Lacade, F-31320 Auzeville Tolosane, France 3 INRA, UMR 1248 AGIR, Chemin de Borde Rouge, Auzeville Tolosane, CS 52627, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France; e-mail: [email protected] 4 University of Toulouse, INP-ENSAT, Avenue de l’Agrobiopôle, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France Key words. Diptera, Syrphidae, Abies alba, deadwood, Fagus silvatica, functional diversity, tree-microhabitats, stand heterogeneity Abstract. Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) provide crucial ecological services and are increasingly used as bioindicators in environ- mental assessment studies. Information is available for a wide range of life history traits at the species level for most Syrphidae but little is recorded about the environmental requirements of forest hoverflies at the stand scale. The aim of this study was to explore whether the structural heterogeneity of a stand influences species richness or abundance of hoverflies in a montane beech-fir forest. We used the catches of Malaise traps set in 2004 and 2007 in three stands in the French Pyrenees, selected to represent a wide range of structural heterogeneity in terms of their vertical structure, tree diversity, deadwood and tree-microhabitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera, Sy Ae)
    Ce nt re fo r Eco logy & Hydrology N AT U RA L ENVIRO N M EN T RESEA RC H CO U N C IL Provisional atlas of British hover les (Diptera, Sy ae) _ Stuart G Ball & Roger K A Morris _ J O I N T NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE NERC Co pyright 2000 Printed in 2000 by CRL Digital Limited ISBN I 870393 54 6 The Centre for Eco logy an d Hydrolo gy (CEI-0 is one of the Centres an d Surveys of the Natu ral Environme nt Research Council (NERC). Established in 1994, CEH is a multi-disciplinary , environmental research organisation w ith som e 600 staff an d w ell-equipp ed labo ratories and field facilities at n ine sites throughout the United Kingdom . Up u ntil Ap ril 2000, CEM co m prise d of fou r comp o nent NERC Institutes - the Institute of Hydrology (IH), the Institute of Freshw ater Eco logy (WE), the Institute of Terrestrial Eco logy (ITE), and the Institute of Virology an d Environmental Micro b iology (IVEM). From the beginning of Ap dl 2000, CEH has operated as a single institute, and the ind ividual Institute nam es have ceased to be used . CEH's mission is to "advance th e science of ecology, env ironme ntal microbiology and hyd rology th rough h igh q uality and inte rnat ionall) recognised research lead ing to better understanding and quantifia ttion of the p hysical, chem ical and b iolo gical p rocesses relating to land an d freshwater an d living organisms within the se environments".
    [Show full text]
  • SINGLE-CELLED SPECIES Is Excessivedisturbanceandcontaminationofsoils
    SINGLE-CELLED SPECIES 1. Status and Distribution Slime moulds share some of the characteristics of In terms of weight, single-celled organisms are the protozoa single-celled organisms. However, they most abundant form of life on this planet. They are have been traditionally studied by mycologists and too small to be seen by the naked eye but make up are often included in fungal studies. Physiologically, around half of all known species in Scotland: the creeping movement achieved by slime moulds is definitely animal-like, but the spore producing Viruses: An estimated 3,300 species in Scotland. reproductive structures are fungus-like. They can be Bacteria: An estimated 3,300 species in Scotland. found in a variety of habitats, particularly on rotting Protozoa: A rough estimate of more than 37,000 wood or seaweed, but almost nothing is known species in Scotland. about their distribution and importance in Dumfries & Galloway. Viruses cannot multiply on their own, so they have to invade a ‘host’ cell and take over its machinery There is still much to discover about single-celled in order to be able to make more virus particles. organisms, but it becoming clear that this microscopic Bacteria are capable of multiplying by themselves, as life keeps many ecosystems functioning and they have the power to divide. They exist everywhere, keeps the Earth habitable. They play a particularly including on and inside our bodies. Viruses and important role in soil ecosystems, though precisely bacteria are best known as agents of disease but SINGLE-CELLED SPECIES how is not yet clear. It is likely that they are critical to most of them are completely harmless and some of many processes, including decomposition, nitrogen them are essential for life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flora and Fauna of the Northwich Woodlands
    The Flora and Fauna of the Northwich Woodlands Compiled by Paul M Hill Last updated: 23 rd August 2010 CONTENTS Plants 4 Mosses 8 Fungi 9 Bryophytes 10 Lichens 10 Beetles 11 Bees, Ants and Wasps 13 Sawflies 13 Parasitic / Gall Waps 14 True Bugs 14 Planthoppers and Aphids 14 Mayflies 14 Scorpianflies 15 Lacewings 15 Stoneflies 15 Caddisflies 15 Flies 15 Micro-moths 20 Butterflies 24 Macro-moths 24 Dragonflies and Damselflies 27 Earwigs 27 Grasshopper, Crickets and Groundhoppers 28 Amphipods 28 Wood and Water Louse 28 Spiders 28 Mites 29 Centipedes and Millipedes 29 Leeches 29 Snails and Slugs 30 Birds 31 Mammals 33 Amphibians and Reptiles 33 BOTANICAL Plants Equisetum arvense............. Field Horsetail Phleum bertolonii................ Smaller Cat's-tail Equisetum palustre............. Marsh Horsetail Phleum pratense ................ Timothy Equisetum sylvaticum......... Wood Horsetail Phragmites australis ........... Common Reed Larix decidua ..................... European Larch Poa annua.......................... Annual Meadow-grass Pinus nigra......................... Austrian Pine / Corsican Poa compressa .................. Flattened Meadow-grass Pine Poa pratensis ..................... Smooth Meadow-grass Pinus sylvestris .................. Scots Pine Poa humilis......................... Spreading Meadow-grass Taxus baccata.................... Yew Poa trivialis......................... Rough Meadow-grass Taxodium distichum ........... Swamp Cypress Puccinellia distans.............. Reflexed Saltmarsh-grass Ophioglossum vulgatum....
    [Show full text]
  • Taxon Group Common Name Taxon Name First Recorded Last
    First Last Taxon group Common name Taxon name recorded recorded amphibian Common Frog Rana temporaria 1987 2017 amphibian Common Toad Bufo bufo 1987 2017 amphibian Smooth Newt Lissotriton vulgaris 1987 1987 annelid Alboglossiphonia heteroclita Alboglossiphonia heteroclita 1986 1986 annelid duck leech Theromyzon tessulatum 1986 1986 annelid Glossiphonia complanata Glossiphonia complanata 1986 1986 annelid leeches Erpobdella octoculata 1986 1986 bird Bullfinch Pyrrhula pyrrhula 2016 2017 bird Carrion Crow Corvus corone 2017 2017 bird Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs 2015 2017 bird Chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita 2014 2016 bird Coot Fulica atra 2014 2014 bird Fieldfare Turdus pilaris 2015 2015 bird Great Tit Parus major 2015 2015 bird Grey Heron Ardea cinerea 2013 2017 bird Jay Garrulus glandarius 1999 1999 bird Kestrel Falco tinnunculus 1999 2015 bird Kingfisher Alcedo atthis 1986 1986 bird Mallard Anas platyrhynchos 2014 2015 bird Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus 2000 2000 bird Moorhen Gallinula chloropus 2015 2015 bird Pheasant Phasianus colchicus 2017 2017 bird Robin Erithacus rubecula 2017 2017 bird Spotted Flycatcher Muscicapa striata 1986 1986 bird Tawny Owl Strix aluco 2006 2015 bird Willow Warbler Phylloscopus trochilus 2015 2015 bird Wren Troglodytes troglodytes 2015 2015 bird Yellowhammer Emberiza citrinella 2000 2000 conifer Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 2004 2004 conifer European Larch Larix decidua 2004 2004 conifer Lawson's Cypress Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 2004 2004 conifer Scots Pine Pinus sylvestris 1986 2004 crustacean
    [Show full text]
  • Rødgjellet Solabbor (Lepomis Gibbosus) I Asker – Status Og Mulige Tiltak
    Rødgjellet solabbor (Lepomis gibbosus) i Asker – status og mulige tiltak RAPPORT NR. 5 - 2012 FYLKESMANNEN I OSLO OG AKERSHUS Miljøvernavdelingen Postboks 8111, Dep. 0032 OSLO Telefon 22 00 35 00 – E-post: [email protected] Tittel: Rapport nr. 5/2012 Rødgjellet solabbor (Lepomis gibbosus) i Asker – status og ( mulige tiltak Dato: 18.5.2012 Forfatter(e): Antall sider: Markus Lindholm, Norsk Institutt for Vannforskning/NIVA 23 Lise Cats Myhre, NTNU Prosjektledere: Kristine Lund og Helge Lorentzen, Miljøvernavdelingen ISBN: 978-82-7473-221-6 ISSN: 0802-582 Sammendrag: Oppdragsgiver for rapporten er FMOA, og den gir en vurdering av det invaderende potensialet til rødgjellet solabbor i vassdrag rundt Oslofjorden, og drøfter mulige tiltak. Rødgjellet solabbor har sin naturlige utbredelse i USA og Canada, men ble spredt til Europa for hundre år siden, og vurderes som en av de ti fiskeartene som har høyest invaderende potensial på verdensbasis. Solabbor ble første gang rapportert fra en isdam i Asker i 2004, men har senere blitt spredt til enkelte andre dammer og tjern i regionen. Forekomstene ligger dels nær Oslofjorden, og da arten tåler salinitet opp mot 18 ‰ er det i prinsippet mulig at den kan spre seg til nye vassdrag via fjorden. Både i Norge og andre land har erfaringer vist at folk har lav terskel for å fange solabbor og sette den ut i nye tjern. Dette er trolig grunnen til den hurtige spredningen også her i landet. NIVA fant reproduserende populasjoner i to ulike tjern. I tillegg er det mistanke om at arten er forsøkt satt ut i andre tjern enn dem som ble undersøkt i 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Effectiveness of Agri-Environment Schemes in Different Agricultural Landscapes in the Netherlands
    Ecological Effectiveness of Agri-Environment Schemes in Different Agricultural Landscapes in The Netherlands DAVID KLEIJN,∗‡ FRANK BERENDSE,∗ RUBEN SMIT,∗ NIELS GILISSEN,∗ JOHN SMIT,∗ BASTIAAN BRAK,∗ AND ROLF GROENEVELD† ∗Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Bornsesteeg 69, 6708 PD Wageningen, The Netherlands †Environmental Economics and Natural Resources Group, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands Abstract: Agri-environment schemes are an instrument used by western European countries to counteract the negative effects of contemporary agriculture on biodiversity, but not much is known about their effectiveness. We investigated the ecological effects of Dutch agri-environment schemes aimed at promoting botanical diversity or meadow birds, and we tested whether the effectiveness of the schemes depends on landscape type or structure. In three different types of landscape, we surveyed plants, birds, bees, and hover flies on 78 paired fields that either had agri-environment schemes or were managed conventionally, and we collected data on a range of different environmental variables. Neither plant species richness nor abundance of meadow birds was higher on fields with agri-environment schemes. Landscape type had a significant effect on both species groups, but the effects of the schemes were independent of landscape type. Neither the diversity of plants nor the abundance of birds was related to any of the environmental variables. Agri-environment schemes designed to promote plant species richness or bird abundance did have positive side-effects because they enhanced the species richness of bees and hover flies, irrespective of the type of landscape. Furthermore, landscape type, groundwater level (hover flies), and area of wooded edges (bees) significantly affected both species groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Digest
    Dipterists Digest Platycheirus c1ypeatus edition No. 5 1990 Dipteri ts Digest No.5 1990 Edited by: Derek Whiteley Published by: Derek Whiteley - Sheffield - England for the Diptera Recording Scheme assisted by the Musee Zoologique, Lausanne, Switzerland ISSN 0953-7260 A A TALE OF lWO TEXTS Martin C.D.SpeighL If one were to be frank, the production of most papers is, more than anything else, a wearisome, solitary business. Whatever excitement there may be, in having uncovered some information worth publishin~, is normally long past by the time the writing begins. The tale of the two texts (Goeldlin et aI, 1990 and Speight & Goeldlin, 1990) on species related to Platycheirns clypeatus (Mg.), is rather different from usual. I suppose that what triggered the whole thing was a visit to Ireland by Prof.Goeldlin and his colleague Alain Maibach, to search for larvae of hoverfly species difficult to obtain in Switzerland. During the course of our various field excursions we had the opportunity to discuss many vexed questions concerning European hoverflies. One matter which interested me was Plalycheirus angustipes, Goeldlin. I asked Prof.Goeldlin which species most closely resembled P.angustipes. His reply that it was most similar to Pnngustatus and P.clypeatus interested me greatly. I had suspected for years that among material of these latter species from Ireland I had some additional taxon mixed in, though, for the life of me, I had not been able to find any satisfactory basis for separating out extra species. On his return to Switzerland, Prof.Goeldlin kindly sent me some specimens of P.angustipes.
    [Show full text]
  • Havstrand På Sørøstlandet Regionale Trekk Og Botaniske Verdier
    0 47 Havstrand på Sørøstlandet Regionale trekk og botaniske verdier Anders Lundberg Knut Rydgren NORSK INSTITUrITI' FOR NATURFORSKNTING Havstrand på Sørøstlandet Regionale trekk og botaniske verdier Anders Lundberg Knut Rydgren NORSK INST1TUTT FOR NATURFORS nina forskningsrapport 047 NINAs Iikalc7';ner Lundberg, A. & Rydgren, K. 1994. Havstrand på Sørøstlandet. Regionale trekk og botaniske verdier. - NINA Forskningsrapport NINA utgir fem ulike faste publikasjoner: 47: 1-222. NINA Forskningsrapport Trondheim, august 1994 Her publiseres resultater av NINAs eget forskningsarbeid, i den hensikt å spre forskningsresultater fra institusjonen til et ISSN 0802-3093 større publikum. Forskningsrapporter utgis som et alternativ ISBN 82-426-0422-3 til internasjonal publisering, der tidsaspekt, materialets art, målgruppe m.m. gjør dette nødvendig. Forvaltningsområde: Arealforvaltning NINA Utredning Land use management Serien omfatter problemoversikter, kartlegging av kunnskaps- nivået innen et emne, litteraturstudier, sammenstilling av an- Rettighetshaver C): dres materiale og annet som ikke primært er et resultat av Stiftelsen for naturforskning og kulturminneforskning NINAs egen forskningsaktivitet. (NINAiNIKU) NINA Oppdragsmelding Publikasjonen kan siteres fritt med kildeangivelse Dette er det minimum av rapportering som NINA gir til opp- dragsgiver etter fullført forsknings- eller utredningsprosjekt. Redaksjon: Opplaget er begrenset. Eli Fremstad NINA, Trondheim NINA Temahefter Disse behandler spesielle tema og utarbeides etter behov for å Design
    [Show full text]
  • 042 Fagrapportfagrapport
    042 FAGRAPPORTFAGRAPPORT Provisional list of rare and potentially threatened spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) in Norway including their proposed Red List status Kjetil Aakra Erling Hauge NINA Norsk institutt for naturforskning nina fagrapport 042 Norwegian Institute for Nature Reseach Aakra, K. & Hauge, E. 2000. Provisional list of rare and potential- ly threatened spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) in Norway including (NINA) and Norwegian Institute for their proposed Red List status. - NINA Fagrapport 42: 1-38. Cultural Heritage Research (NIKU) Trondheim, July 2000 issue the following publications: ISSN 0805-469X NINA Scientific Reports (Fagrapport) ISBN 82-426-1151-3 NIKU Scientific Reports (Fagrapport) These series present the results of NINAs and NIKUs own rese- Management field: arch work, overviews of problems, existing knowledge within Conservation of biodiversity a topic, literature reviews and material gathered from outside sources. The reports are issued as an alternative or a supliment Copyright ©: to international publication when timing, the nature of the Foundation for Nature Research and material or the sector targeted, call for it. Cultural Heritage Research (NINA•NIKU) NINA Assignment Report (Oppdragsmelding) The report may be quoted when the source is NIKU Assignment Report (Oppdragsmelding) mentioned by name. This is the minimum report supplied by NINA/NIKU when ex- ternal research or investigative assignments have been com- pleted. The number of copies are limited. NINA Topic Report (Temahefte) NIKU Topic Report (Temahefte) These series present special topics. The series is targeted at the general public or specific groups in the community, e.g. the Editor: agricultural sector, environmental departments, tourism and Bjørn Åge Tømmerås outdoor recreation, organizations etc.
    [Show full text]