Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title GEOCHEMICAL AND COSMOCHEMICAL CYCLES INVOLVING SULFUR, SULFIDE, SULFITE, AND SULFATE Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3jb1c1qd Author Meyer, B. Publication Date 1979-07-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California LBL-9396 (!_~ Preprint · lrnl Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory ~ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, CA Materials & Molecular Research Division Submitted to Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta GEOCHEMICAL AND COSMOCHEMICAL CYCLES INVOLVING SULFUR, SULFIDE, SULFITE, AND SULFATE -. ECEP/ED B. Meyer, L. Peter and M. Ospina ~o./l.WR!:NCE Sl:fi..KW,'ZY I.A30RAiORY ! IJI 7 Q HY"Ig July 1979 .J t L u 1::1/ LlBR!.RY AND DOCUMENTS SE:Cl'IO.N TWp-WEEK LOAN COPY This is a Library Circulating Copy which may be borrowed for two weeks. For a personal retention copy, call Tech. Info. Division, Ext. 6782 Prepared for the U. S. Department of Energy under Contract W-7405-ENG-48 DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor the Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or the Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof or the Regents of the University of California. 0 GEOCHEMICAL AND COSMOCHEMICAL CYCLES INVOLVING SULFUR, SULFIDE, SULFITE AND SULFATE B. Meyer, * L. Peter and M. Ospina Department of Chemistry University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195 and Molecular and Materials Research Division Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California Berkeley, California 94720 ABSTRACT Raman spectra· of aqueous systems containing sulfur dioxide, elemental sulfur and sulfate indicate that the equilibrium between these species is catalyzed by elemental sulfur. There­ fore, dynamic equilibrium can be expected under conditions prevalent on Venus, on Io and in epigenic sulfur deposits. Sulfur, sulfuric acid, sulfur dioxide and water are in contact with each other in a variety of systems such as planetary atmospheres (Knollenberg, 1979; Nelson, 1978; Oyama, 1979; and Stewart, 1979), bio-epigenic sulfur deposits (Rucknick, 1979) as well as in industrial so2 recovery systems in coal burning power plants (Meyer, 1977). The reactions and equilibria between elemental sulfur, sulfur dioxide, sulfuric acid and water can be summarized in two over-all equations: Eq. 3S02 + 2H 20 2H 2so4 + 1/n sn + Eq. I I 1/n sn + 4H 2o 3H 2S H2so4 At room temperature pure liquid so2 in contact with water is stable for many years. Likewise, elemental sulfur, water and sulfuric acid do not readily react. However, contrary to· the widely held belief, this sulfur system is not inert. Priestley, 1970, heated sulfur dioxide in a sealed tube and observed the reaction over a period of several months and observed crystals which he identifi.ed as elemental sulfur. Boehm, 1882, studied reaction Eq. II. Bichowsky, 1922, studied both systems carefully and discovered that the reactions are rever­ sible. Despite its importance and practical applications, the chemistry of this system has not been studied in more than half a century, even though Thode's pioneering work on isotope fractionization (Monster, 1965) stimulated interest among earth scientists (Ellis, 1971; Dana, 1966; Dana 1971; and Robertson, 1973). Unfortunately, thermodynamics are only of limited help, because of the uncertainty about the variety of states in which the various sulfur species can appear. We report here some qualitative data based on experiments in which we used high purity elemental sulfur and ~situ observation techniques. Neither was available to earlier authors. At room temperature, we confirm that the pure chemicals in reaction (I) do not react notice­ ably over a period of at least five years. However, in the presence of ammonia or other suitable catalysts, reaction commences within weeks (Meyer, 1979), elemental sulfur precipi­ tates from tubes containing sulfur dioxide within one to three years, and the resulting -1- 0 r H20 -' 5042 b_;:~ HS04 s H0 2 2 c so.;- - ~ d ~ ~20 ~ XBL 793-8912 Fig. 1. Raman spectra of sulfur systems: (a) S02 and H20 after 27 hours at 80°C, (b) elemental sulfur and water after 24 hours at 190°C, (c) elemental sulfur, S02 and H20 after 12 hours at 120°C, and (d) so2 and water with 0.1 MBac1 2 after 12 hours at 25°C. solution contains dithionate and other sulfur oxyacids as transient species, in addition to sulfate which constitutes the most stable end product. Figure la shows the Ramen spectrum of the aqueous phase in a sealed pyrex tube 6 mm diam. x 6 em containing 0.2 ml. H20 and 0.2 ml liquid sulfur dioxide at 25°C after it was heated for 27 hrs at 80°C. The liquid remained clear and colorless. The broad peaks at 470 cm-1 and 800 cm-1 are characteristic for colloidal sulfur; the weak shoulders at 980 cm-l and 1,050 cm-l are due to sulfate and bisul­ 1 fate, respectively. The strongest peak at 1,144 cm- , due to unreacted sulfur dioxide, is ) not shown. The Raman band intensities can be evaluated by comparison with the internal water ·standard (Meyer, 1979) and correspond to 0.25 M sulfate and 0.30 M bisulfate solutions. Our observations are consistent with Bichowsky's equilibrium studies (Bichowsky, 1922), however, we have found that at 80°C reaction (I) proceeds about halfway in one day or less, while Bichowsky observed that at 312°C equilibrium in the opposite direction required at least three to seven days. -2- According to earlier work (Bichowsky, 1922) reaction (II) takes sixty days to reach equili­ brium at 260°C. However, using high purity sulfur, we observed already after 24 hrs at 190°C the Raman spectrum in Figure lb. The main peaks correspond to 0.01 M sulfate (so -2) and 4 0.03 M bisulfide (HS-1). Upon further heating, the concentration of sulfuric acid does not increase rapidly, but hydrogen sulfide disappears, probably because sulfuric acid and elemen­ tal sulfur enter reaction (I), and the resulting sulfur dioxide consume hydrogen sulfide yielding elemental sulfur. The latter reaction is well known and was first described by Wackenroder, 1846. It involves the formation of intermediate species in intermediate oxida­ tion states, including thiosulfate, tetrathionate, and other polythionates which are not stable under our conditions (Meyer, 1977). The existence of hydrogen sulfide in reaction (II) suggests that hydrogen sulfide might also occur as an intermediate in reaction (I). Unfortunately, this cannot be easily verified, beca·use of the above mentioned Wachenroder reaction. In further experiments, we added elemental sulfur to the reagents in reaction (I). Figure lc shows the Raman spectrum of this system after it was kept for 12 hrs at 120°C. The peaks at 1 1 1 1,050 cm- and 980 cm- correspond to 1 M Hso4- solution and 0.2 M sulfate. Obviously, this reaction is far faster than with so2 and water alone, as observed in the experiment shown in Figure la. We observed the behavior of this system over a range of temperatures between 20°C and 200°C, and conclude that it is catalyzed by solid as well as liquid elemental sulfur. We do not understand the mechanism, but the affinity between sulfur dioxide and elemental sulfur is consistent with our earlier observation that the solubility of elemental sulfur in so2 exhibits unusual temperature dependence (Meyer, 1971). The solubility and catalysis effects are both difficult to measure quantitatively, because sulfur undergoes a phase tran­ sition at 95°C and changes its allotropic composition above the melting point at 124°C. The catalysis appears to be inhibited by a factor of four in 1M HCl, but this effect is due to the fact that HCl reduces the solubility of S02 in water. In the last set of experiments we sealed so2 in a tube containing 0.1 M BaC1 2. The solution promptly clouded at room temperature due to the formation of BaS03 which slowly precipitated. Figure ld shows the Raman spectrum of the suspension after 9 hrs. The strongest peak at 960 cm-1 is due to barium sulfite. The peaks at ?00, 490 and 460 cm-1 are due to orthorhom­ bic elemental sulfur. The peak at 980 cm-1 corresponds to sulfate. Since barium sulfate has a solubility product (Cohen, 1940) of about lo-10 , our observation indicates that the sulfate ion concentration reaches at least 10-9 M in our system. Our experiments show that the ubiquitous reactions (I) and (II) can proceed over a wide range of temperatures, and thus can take a dynamic role wherever elemental sulfur and and sulfuric acid or sulfite and water are present. The Pioneer experiments (Knollenberg, 1979; Oyama, 1979; Stewart, 1979) have recently indicated that in the upper cloud layer in the atmosphere of Venus at 13°C, sulfuric acid (Knollenberg, 1979) and sulfur dust are present. In lower, hotter levels, 30 miles above the ground, sulfur dioxide (Oyama, 1979; Stewart, 1979) and water vapor at about 200°C are present.
Recommended publications
  • Crown Chemical Resistance Chart
    Crown Polymers, Corp. 11111 Kiley Drive Huntley, IL. 60142 USA www.crownpolymers.com 847-659-0300 phone 847-659-0310 facisimile 888-732-1270 toll free Chemical Resistance Chart Crown Polymers Floor and Secondary Containment Systems Products: CrownShield covers the following five (4) formulas: CrownShield 50, Product No. 320 CrownCote, Product No. 401 CrownShield 40-2, Product No. 323 CrownShield 28, Product No. 322 CrownPro AcidShield, Product No. 350 CrownCote AcidShield, Product No. 430 CrownPro SolventShield, Product No. 351 CrownCote SolventShield, Product No. 440 This chart shows chemical resistance of Crown Polymers foundational floor and secondary containment product line that would be exposed to chemical spill or immersion conditions. The chart was designed to provide general product information. For specific applications, contact your local Crown Polymers Floor and Secondary Containment Representative or call direct to the factory. ; Resistant to chemical immersion up to 7 days followed by wash down with water 6 Spillage environments that will be cleaned up within 72 hours after initial exposure. 9 Not Recommended Chemical CrownShield SolventShield AcidShield Chemical CrownShield SolventShield AcidShield 1, 4-Dichloro-2-butene 9 6 6 Aluminum Bromate ; ; ; 1, 4-Dioxane 9 6 6 Aluminum Bromide ; ; ; 1-1-1 Trichloroethane 9 ; ; Aluminum Chloride ; ; ; 2, 4-Pentanedione 6 ; 6 Aluminum Fluoride (25%) ; ; ; 3, 4-Dichloro-1-butene 6 6 6 Aluminum Hydroxide ; ; ; 4-Picoline (0-50%) 9 6 6 Aluminum Iodine ; ; ; Acetic Acid (0-15%) 9 6 6
    [Show full text]
  • The Institute of Paper Chemistry
    The Institute of Paper Chemistry Appleton, Wisconsin Doctor's Dissertation A Study of the Order and Nature of the Aspenwood Hemicellulose Removed During a Neutral Sulfite Semichemical Cook Robert Harold Quick June, 1955 A STUDY OF THE ORDER AND NATURE OF THE ASPENWOOD HEMICELLULOSE REMOVED DURING A NEUTRAL SULFITE SEMICHEMICAL COOK A thesis submitted by Robert Harold Quick B.S. in M.E. 1948, University of Washington M.S. 1953, Lawrence College in partial fulfillment of the requirements of The Institute of Paper Chemistry for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy from Lawrence College, Appleton, Wisconsin June, 1955 TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY iv INTRODUCTION Background of the Problem 1 Statement of the Problem 3 Historical Review 3 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS Approach to the Problem 7 Wood Data 7 Cooking Conditions 7 Spent Liquor Study During a NSSC Cook Cook C2P1 8 Hydrolysis of C2P1 Spent Liquor 10 Approximate Organic Balance on C2P1SL 10 Study of the Pulp and Liquor Cooks C3P1, C4P2, and C5P1 17 Hydrolysis of Spent Liquor 19 Wood and Pulp Analyses 23 Spent Liquor "Hemicellulose" Analysis 31 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS Liquor Study 35 Pulp and Liquor Study 37 SUMMARY 51 CONCLUSIONS 54 APPENDIX I Experimental Procedures Preparation of Chips 56 Pulping 56 iii Preparation of Holocellulose 57 Extraction of Hemicellulose from Holocellulose 59 Recovery of "Hemicellulose" from the Spent Liquor 61 Isolation of the Cold Water Extract of Aspenwood 62 Determination of the Degree of Polymerization Hemicellulose 63 Alkali-Resistant Cellulose 64 Hydrolysis Procedures
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Resistance 100% SOLIDS EPOXY SYSTEMS
    Chemical Resistance 100% SOLIDS EPOXY SYSTEMS CHEMICAL 8300 SYSTEM 8200 SYSTEM 8000 SYSTEM OVERKOTE PLUS HD OVERKOTE HD OVERKRETE HD BASED ON ONE YEAR IMMERSION TESTING –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Acetic Acid (0-15%) G II Acetonitrile LLG L Continuous Immersion Acetone (0-20%) LLL Acetone (20-30%) Suitable for continuous immersion in that chemical (based on LLG Acetone (30-50%) L G I ONE YEAR testing) to assure unlimited service life. Acetone (50-100%) G II Acrylamide (0-50%) LLL G Short-Term Exposure Adipic Acid Solution LLL Alcohol, Isopropyl LLL Suitable for short-term exposure to that chemical such as Alcohol, Ethyl LLG secondary containment (72 hours) or splash and spill Alcohol, Methyl LLI (immediate clean-up). Allyl Chloride LLI Allylamine (0-20%) L L I Allylamine (20-30%) L G I I Not Suitable Allylamine (30-50%) GGI Not suitable for any exposure to that chemical. Aluminum Bromide LL– Aluminum Chloride L L – Aluminum Fluoride (0-25%) L L – This chart shows chemical resistance of our various Aluminum Hydroxide LLL 1 topping materials (90 mils – ⁄4"). These ratings are based on Aluminum Iodide LL– temperatures being ambient. At higher temperatures, chemical Aluminum Nitrate LL– resistance may be effected. When chemical exposure is Aluminum Sodium Chloride L L – minimal to non-existent, a 9000 System–FlorClad™ HD or Aluminum Sulfate LLL 4600 System– BriteCast™ HD may be used. Alums L L L 2-Aminoethoxyethanol Resistance data is listed with the assumption that the material GGG has properly cured for at least four days, at recommended Ammonia – Wet L L – temperatures, prior to any chemical exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Names and CAS Numbers Final
    Chemical Abstract Chemical Formula Chemical Name Service (CAS) Number C3H8O 1‐propanol C4H7BrO2 2‐bromobutyric acid 80‐58‐0 GeH3COOH 2‐germaacetic acid C4H10 2‐methylpropane 75‐28‐5 C3H8O 2‐propanol 67‐63‐0 C6H10O3 4‐acetylbutyric acid 448671 C4H7BrO2 4‐bromobutyric acid 2623‐87‐2 CH3CHO acetaldehyde CH3CONH2 acetamide C8H9NO2 acetaminophen 103‐90‐2 − C2H3O2 acetate ion − CH3COO acetate ion C2H4O2 acetic acid 64‐19‐7 CH3COOH acetic acid (CH3)2CO acetone CH3COCl acetyl chloride C2H2 acetylene 74‐86‐2 HCCH acetylene C9H8O4 acetylsalicylic acid 50‐78‐2 H2C(CH)CN acrylonitrile C3H7NO2 Ala C3H7NO2 alanine 56‐41‐7 NaAlSi3O3 albite AlSb aluminium antimonide 25152‐52‐7 AlAs aluminium arsenide 22831‐42‐1 AlBO2 aluminium borate 61279‐70‐7 AlBO aluminium boron oxide 12041‐48‐4 AlBr3 aluminium bromide 7727‐15‐3 AlBr3•6H2O aluminium bromide hexahydrate 2149397 AlCl4Cs aluminium caesium tetrachloride 17992‐03‐9 AlCl3 aluminium chloride (anhydrous) 7446‐70‐0 AlCl3•6H2O aluminium chloride hexahydrate 7784‐13‐6 AlClO aluminium chloride oxide 13596‐11‐7 AlB2 aluminium diboride 12041‐50‐8 AlF2 aluminium difluoride 13569‐23‐8 AlF2O aluminium difluoride oxide 38344‐66‐0 AlB12 aluminium dodecaboride 12041‐54‐2 Al2F6 aluminium fluoride 17949‐86‐9 AlF3 aluminium fluoride 7784‐18‐1 Al(CHO2)3 aluminium formate 7360‐53‐4 1 of 75 Chemical Abstract Chemical Formula Chemical Name Service (CAS) Number Al(OH)3 aluminium hydroxide 21645‐51‐2 Al2I6 aluminium iodide 18898‐35‐6 AlI3 aluminium iodide 7784‐23‐8 AlBr aluminium monobromide 22359‐97‐3 AlCl aluminium monochloride
    [Show full text]
  • Rowe Scientific Barium Chloride Dihydrate
    ROWE SCIENTIFIC BARIUM CHLORIDE DIHYDRATE ROWE SCIENTIFIC Chemwatch Hazard Alert Code: 3 Chemwatch: 11379 Issue Date: 27/06/2017 Version No: 4.1.1.1 Print Date: 23/09/2019 Safety Data Sheet according to WHS and ADG requirements S.GHS.AUS.EN SECTION 1 IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE / MIXTURE AND OF THE COMPANY / UNDERTAKING Product Identifier Product name BARIUM CHLORIDE, DIHYDRATE Chemical Name barium chloride, dihydrate Synonyms CB0480, CB0481 Proper shipping name BARIUM COMPOUND, N.O.S. (contains barium chloride, dihydrate) Chemical formula BaCl2·2H2O|Ba-Cl2 Other means of Not Available identification CAS number 10326-27-9 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Manufacture of pigments, colour lakes, glass, mordant for acid dyes; weighting and dyeing textile fabrics; in aluminium Relevant identified uses refining; as a pesticide; boiler compounds for softening water; tanning and finishing leather. Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Registered company ROWE SCIENTIFIC name Address 11 Challenge Boulevard, Wangara WA 6065 Australia Telephone +61 8 9302 1911 Fax +61 8 9302 1905 Website Not Available Email [email protected] Emergency telephone number Association / ROWE SCIENTIFIC Organisation Emergency telephone +61 8 9302 1911 (24 Hrs) numbers Other emergency Not Available telephone numbers SECTION 2 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION Classification of the substance or mixture HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL. DANGEROUS GOODS. According to the WHS Regulations and the ADG Code. Poisons Schedule S6 Classification [1] Acute Toxicity (Inhalation) Category 4, Acute Toxicity (Oral) Category 3 1. Classified by Chemwatch; 2. Classification drawn from HCIS; 3. Classification drawn from Regulation (EU) No 1272/2008 - Legend: Annex VI Label elements Continued..
    [Show full text]
  • Decomposition of Dithionates Dissertation
    DECOMPOSITION OF DITHIONATE S DISSE RTATI ON PRESEN TE D IN PA RTIAL F%LFI L LM EN T O F TH E REQ %IREM ENTS FO R THE D EG REE O F DO C TO R O F PHI LO SO PH Y IN THE G RA D%A TE S C H O O L O F THE O HIO STATE %N I%ERSITY BY JACOB CORNOG 1921 TABLE O F C ONTE NTS R eview of th e Lit er atur e P ertin ent t o th e Form ation and f t t po sition o Di hiona es . Aim s of th e Pr es ent Work on of B ar i um Dithionate a x e e t al of V riou s Dithionates (E p rim n . ) G en eral C on sider ation s an d Proc edur e T he D ecompo s ition of Barium Dithion at e of Some Other Dithionat es th e Lit eratur e P LYT H I O A T E I . T H E O N S H Dithionic acid , 2 8 2 0 6 , the first ember of this remarkable 1 - group of acids , was discovered in 9 by Welter and Gay Lus 1 5“ sacl H 1 842 Lan lo i s z ; trithionic acid , 2 S 3 0 6 , in , by g ; tetrathionic H 1 843 G elis 3 a acid , 2 8 4 0 6 , in , by Fordos and ; pent thionic acid , H 8 0 1 845 Wacken roder“ hexathi 2 5 6 , in , by ; finally potassium K 1 88 5 onate , Q S 6 , was discovered in 8 by D ebu s as a part of ’ roder his classic investigation of Wacken s solution .
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Resistance Chart
    Polyurethane Thermal-Chem Corp. High Performance Epoxy Topcoats Products Chemical Resistance Chart E56 E = Excellent G = Good F = Fair Clear surfacer Plus 3.0 DecoTop < = Occasional Spillage U = Do Not Use AcidGard VersiGard ArmorTred Resurfacer Resurfacer ArmorClad Resurfacer Re DecoThane ArmorBond SolventGard DecoTop P92 Chemical 750 755 757 728 731 736 705 748 1056 1060 Polyurethane Thermal-Chem Corp. High Performance Epoxy Topcoats Products Chemical Resistance Chart E = Excellent G = Good F = Fair Clear surfacer Plus 3.0 DecoTop < = Occasional Spillage U = Do Not Use AcidGard VersiGard ArmorTred Resurfacer Resurfacer ArmorClad Resurfacer Re ThermalCrete ArmorBond SolventGard DecoFinish P81 Chemical 750 755 757 728 731 736 705 748 1030 1062 1, 4-Dichloro-2-butene U E E U U U U U U U 1, 4-Dioxane U < < U U U U U U U 1-1-1 Trichloroethane E E E F F G G F G G < < < < < 2, 4-Pentanedione F E E F F 3, 4-Dichloro-1-butene < E E U U U U U U U 4-Picoline (0-50%) U < < U U U U U V V Acetic Acid (0-5%) E E E G G G G G E G < < < < < < Acetic Acid (5-15%) E E E F Acetone(0-20%) E E E F G G G G E F Acetone (20-30% < E E < < < < < E < Acetone (30-50%) < E E < < < < < E < Acetone (50-100%) < F F < < < < < E < Acetonitrile F E E < < < < < E < Acrylamide (0-50%) E E E F G G G G F Adipic Acid Solution E E E E E E E E G Alcohol, Ethyl E E E F F F F F F Alcohol, Isopropyl E E E F F F F F G F Alcohol, Methyl < E E < < < < < < < Allyl Chloride < E E U U U U U E < Allylamine (0-20%) < E E U U U U U < Allylamine (20-30%) < E E U U U U U < Allylamine (30-50%) U < < U U U U U U Aluminum Bromate E E E F G G G G E Aluminum Bromide E E E E E E E E E Aluminum Chloride E E E E E E E E E Aluminum Fluoride (25%) E E E E E E E E E Polyurethane Thermal-Chem Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • HDPE Chemical Resistance Guide
    HDPE Chemical Resistance Guide 70º F 140º F 70º F 140º F Reagent (21º C) (60º C) Reagent (21º C) (60º C) A B Acetaldehyde S O Barium carbonate saturated S S Acetic acid (1-10%) S S Barium carbonate saturated S S Acetic acid (10-60%) S O Barium hydroxide S S Acetic acid (80-100%) S O Barium sulfate saturated S S Acetic anhydride S S Barium sulfite saturated S S Acetone S S Beer S S Acids (aromatic) S S Benzaldehyde S O Acrylic emulsions S S Benzene O U Adipic acid S S Benzene sulfonic acid S S Aluminum chloride concentrated S S Benzoic acid crystals S S Aluminum chloride dilute S S Benzoic acid saturated S S Aluminum fluoride concentrated S S Bismuth carbonate saturated S S Aluminum sulfate concentrated S S Black liquor S S Alums (all types) concentrated S S Bleach lye (10%) S S Amino acetic acid S S Borax cold saturated S S Ammonia (100% dry gas) S S Boric acid concentrated S S Ammonium acetate S S Boric acid dilute S S Ammonium bromide S S Brine S S Ammonium carbonate S S Bromic acid (10%) S S Ammonium chloride saturated S S Bromine liquid (100%) O U Ammonium fluoride (20%) S S Bromochloromethane U U Ammonium hydroxide S S Butadiene U U Ammonium metaphosphate (sat.) S S Butanediol (10%) S S Ammonium nitrate saturated S S Butanediol (60%) S S Ammonium persulfate saturated S S Butanediol (100%) S S Ammonium phosphate S S Butter S S Ammonium sulfate saturated S S Butyl acetate (100%) O U Ammonium sulfide saturated S S Butyl alcohol (100%) S S Ammonium thiocyanate saturated S S Butylene glycol S S Amyl acetate (100%) O U Butyric acid (100%)
    [Show full text]
  • Database Full Listing
    16-Nov-06 OLI Data Base Listings for ESP version 7.0.46, Analyzers 2.0.46 and all current alliance products Data Base OLI Tag (ESP) Name IUPAC Name Formula CAS Registry Number Molecular Weight ALLOY AL2U 2-Aluminum uranium Al2U 291.98999 ALLOY AL3TH 3-Aluminum thorium Al3Th 312.982727 ALLOY AL3TI 3-Aluminum titanium Al3Ti 128.824615 ALLOY AL3U 3-Aluminum uranium Al3U 318.971527 ALLOY AL4U 4-Aluminum uranium Al4U 345.953064 ALLOY ALSB Aluminum antimony AlSb 148.731537 ALLOY ALTI Aluminum titanium AlTi 74.861542 ALLOY ALTI3 Aluminum 3-titanium AlTi3 170.621536 ALLOY AUCD Gold cadmium AuCd 309.376495 ALLOY AUCU Gold copper AuCu 260.512512 ALLOY AUCU3 Gold 3-copper AuCu3 387.604492 ALLOY AUSN Gold tin AuSn 315.676514 ALLOY AUSN2 Gold 2-tin AuSn2 434.386505 ALLOY AUSN4 Gold 4-tin AuSn4 671.806519 ALLOY BA2SN 2-Barium tin Ba2Sn 393.369995 ALLOY BI2U 2-Bismuth uranium Bi2U 655.987671 ALLOY BI4U3 4-Bismuth 3-uranium Bi4U3 1550.002319 ALLOY BIU Bismuth uranium BiU 447.007294 ALLOY CA2PB 2-Calcium lead Ca2Pb 287.355988 ALLOY CA2SI 2-Calcium silicon Ca2Si 108.241501 ALLOY CA2SN 2-Calcium tin Ca2Sn 198.865997 ALLOY CA3SB2 3-Calcium 2-antimony Ca3Sb2 363.734009 ALLOY CAMG2 Calcium 2-magnesium CaMg2 88.688004 ALLOY CAPB Calcium lead CaPb 247.278 ALLOY CASI Calcium silicon CaSi 68.163498 ALLOY CASI2 Calcium 2-silicon CaSi2 96.249001 ALLOY CASN Calcium tin CaSn 158.787994 ALLOY CAZN Calcium zinc CaZn 105.468002 ALLOY CAZN2 Calcium 2-zinc CaZn2 170.858002 ALLOY CD11U 11-Cadmium uranium Cd11U 1474.536865 ALLOY CD3AS2 3-Cadmium 2-arsenic As2Cd3 487.073212
    [Show full text]
  • Barium Sulfite
    240 Barium Sulfite COHPONE:-iTS: EVALUATOR: 1. Bar1um sulf1te; BaS03; [7787-39-5] H.D. Lutz, Dept. of Chem1stry, 2. Water; H20; [7732-18-5] University of Slegen, FR Germany. August 1983. CRITICAL EVALUATION: Bar1um sulflte crystalllzes from aqueous solutions 1n the form of the anhydrous salt, BaS03' The solub111ty of BaS03 1n water has not yet been thoroughly invest1gated. Numer1cal data have been reported by Autenrleth et a1. (1), ROgow1CZ (2), Parsons (3), Marecek et a1. (4), Rod1n ct a1. (5), and Cohen et a1. (6), yet not under directly comparable exper1mental conditions. In 1898, Autenr1eth et a1. (1) reported the value 4 of 0.022 g/kg H20 (m(BaS03) = 1.0 x 10- mol kg-I) at 289 K. Rogowicz (2) gave the values 0.1974 and 0.0177 g/dm3 (c(BaS03) = 9.080 x 10-4 and 8.14 x 10-5 mol dm- 3) at 293 and 353 K, respect1vely. Parsons (3) reported the solubil1ty product of BaS03 (K sO ) as 9.5 x 10-10 mol 2 dm-6 at 298.2 K from a source which is not given nor could be traced. This value 1S equ1valent to a solubility of 6.7 mg/dm3 (c(BaS03) = 3.08 x 10-5 mol dm- 3). In 1983 Rod1n et a1. (5) determined some values from 1.23 x 10-3 g/dm3 (c(BaS03) = 5.7 x 10-6 mol dm- 3) at 293 K to 3.5 x 10-3 g/dm3 (1.61 x 10-5 mol dm-3) at 353 K.
    [Show full text]
  • Solubility Product Constants
    SOLUBILITY PRODUCT CONSTANTS The solubility product constant Ksp is a useful parameter for which is strongly shifted to the right except in very basic solutions. calculating the aqueous solubility of sparingly soluble compounds Furthermore, the equilibrium constant for this reaction, which de- under various conditions. It may be determined by direct measure- pends on the second ionization constant of H2S, is poorly known. ment or calculated from the standard Gibbs energies of formation Therefore it is more useful in the case of sulfides to define a differ- ∆fG° of the species involved at their standard states. Thus if Ksp = ent solubility product Kspa based on the reaction [M+]m, [A–]n is the equilibrium constant for the reaction + + MmSn(s) + 2H mM + nH2S (aq) + – MmAn(s) mM (aq) + nA (aq), Values of Kspa , taken from Reference 8, are given for several sulfides + - where MmAn is the slightly soluble substance and M and A are the in the auxiliary table following the main table. Additional discus- ions produced in solution by the dissociation of MmAn, then the sion of sulfide equilibria may be found in References 7 and 9. Gibbs energy change is + – ∆G° = m ∆fG° (M ,aq) + n ∆fG° (A ,aq) –∆fG° (MmAn, s) References The solubility product constant is calculated from the equation 1. Wagman, D. D., Evans, W. H., Parker, V. B., Schumm, R. H., Halow, I., Bailey, S. M., Churney, K. L., and Nuttall, R. L., The NBS Tables of Chemical Thermodynamic Properties, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Vol. ln K = –∆ G°/RT sp 11, Suppl. 2, 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulfur Dioxide Oxidation and Isotope Fractionation As a Function of Ph
    Sulfur dioxide oxidation and isotope fractionation as a function of pH Mark Wong Advisor: Dr. James Farquhar, Dr. Nanping Wu GEOL394 April 26, 2017 Abstract Acid rain is produced by oxidation of compounds such as sulfur dioxide, and causes damage to human structures and to the natural environment. Sulfur dioxide is released via fossil fuel combustion and when sulfur dioxide dissolves in water, it oxidizes to produce sulfate and sulfuric acid. Sulfur isotopes can be used to identify a source of pollution but when sulfur dioxide is oxidized, the isotopes fractionate and this introduces complexity to the source identification process. Sulfur dioxide, bisulfite, and sulfite will be oxidized by air during oxidation experiments that will vary the pH. Ultimately, changing pH will yield changes in isotopic redistribution in sulfur species and the pH of the solution of bisulfite is related to the fractionation of the sulfate produced in the oxidation reaction. The experiments conducted were set at certain pH levels through the use of buffer solutions to ensure the pH of the solution remains constant throughout the duration of the experiment. After oxidation, the remaining sulfite species in solution will be converted to gaseous sulfur dioxide by acidification using HCl. The sulfur dioxide will be pumped into another solution containing hydrogen peroxide and sodium hydroxide to oxidize the sulfur dioxide and trap in solution. After trapping, barium chloride will be added to precipitate barite which will be separated from the solution, weighed and prepared for mass spectrometer analysis and the sulfur isotope ratios in the barite will be analyzed. These ratios have provided some insight into the isotope fractionation process by revealing a correlation between pH and the fractionation factor.
    [Show full text]