Torah-Observant Jewish Married Couples: the Influence of Mandated Abstinence Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Torah-Observant Jewish Married Couples: the Influence of Mandated Abstinence Of Torah-Observant Jewish Married Couples: The Influence of Mandated Abstinence of Physical Touch and Marital Maintenance by Melissa Wallace Framer Black A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved May 2020 to the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Jonathan Pettigrew, Co-Chair Anthony Roberto, Co-Chair Marilyn Thompson ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY August 2020 ABSTRACT Maintaining sexual desire as the marriage endures is a challenge, especially as it involves the interplay of seemingly opposing tensions of novelty, autonomy, and closeness. Difficulties can arise when autonomy, which requires spousal distancing, is perceived as a martial threat and therefore suppressed. This dissertation investigates whether prosocial marital distancing can nurture autonomy and promote sexual desire. Torah-observant Jewish married couples practice family purity, a Jewish law forbidding sexual relations during menstruation and shortly thereafter. During this time couples often avoid sleeping in the same bed, physical touch, and behaviors that can instigate a sexual encounter. These distancing restrictions are lifted when the wife immerses in a ritual bath. The process repeats at the next menstruation. This research examined the effects of family purity’s marital distancing through two studies. The first involved qualitative interviews of family purity wives (N = 10) guided by relational dialectics theory (Baxter & Montgomery, 1996). Study one findings suggest that family purity wives navigate the three tensions of integration, expression, and certainty. Study one also revealed a new tension, the dialect of restraint. The dialectic of restraint appears to enhance marital communication, heighten the appreciation for the mundane, and help sustain sexual desire. Study two, the quantitative phase of the research, applied self-expansion theory (Aron & Aron, 1986) to investigate differences between family purity and non-family purity couples. A sample of 90 married Jewish dyads (N = 180) participated in a cross- sectional online questionnaire. Findings suggest that while non-practicing couples report greater self-expansion, family purity couples report greater sexual closeness. Family i purity couples also report the same closeness and sexual closeness ideals, whereas non- practicing couples reported divergent ideals. Non-practicing family purity husbands had the greatest reported discrepancy between ideal and actual sexual closeness. The combined findings suggest that sanctioned prosocial distancing as practiced by family purity couples enables the integration of cognitive growth and mitigates the threat of autonomy. Prosocial distancing within the family purity marriage appears to provide the wife space for autonomy that in turn provokes novelty and sexual desire. Findings are discussed in relation to theoretical contributions, study limitations, and future directions. ii DEDICATION For my babies, Joseph Samuel Carey Black and Sophie Elizabeth Carey Black. Thank you, God, for this privilege and honor. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Completing a dissertation truly takes a village. First and foremost, thank you to my mother, Miranda, for lovingly looking after Joseph and Sophie so I could focus on this project. Having my babies while writing this dissertation would have been unmanageable without you. To my father, my aba, Mory, thank you for your unconditional support and love in all that I do and for your dedication to my success. To my sister, Francesca, thank you for always being there to listen, pour a glass of wine, and make me laugh. To Meri Sue, Paul, Lexi and Parker, we are so lucky to be so close emotionally and geographically. Thank you to my mother-in-law, Suzie, for your love and encouragement. To my partner in life, my loving husband, my number one fan, David. Your unwavering support and encouragement during this marathon gave me strength when I felt weak and hope when I felt discouraged. May we always support each other and our growth as we build our beautiful family, side by side. I am so proud of this life we are building. I am forever grateful for my supportive committee, Drs. Jonathan Pettigrew, Anthony Roberto, and Marilyn Thompson. Thank you for supporting my decision to grow my family while writing this dissertation. Dr. Pettigrew, you are an all-star. You were always available to work through challenging ideas, proofreading some pretty horrible first drafts, and motivating me to just keep going. I feel so fortunate to have had your guidance and mentorship, both academically and personally. To my gatekeeper: without you, this study would not have been possible. To Daniel Coven: thank you for your many hours helping me with statistics and for your encouragement. To Kristen Foht, thank you for your editing brilliance. iv To my wonderful and inspiring friends across the country and globe: Lara Svedin, Caitlin Curry, Jaime Cohen, Aliza Heiligman, Nayha Ikram, Rachel Mervis, Dr. Versha Anderson, and Shauna Schmeisser. I love you all so much. Dr. Versha Anderson, you walked me back from many cliffs. I cannot count how many times I called you crying, saying it was too hard to finish my dissertation with little babies and no sleep. You always answered the phone, were always there to help, encourage a nap, a chat, and ultimately re-set my compass to point me in the best direction to face the finish line. Thank you. Lastly, to my amazing tribe of mothers: Dr. Sarah Wypizinski, Lindsey Goldsmith-Weiss, Sharri Finkelstein, Jessica Englander, Leah Amiot, and Rebecca Feinman. Mothering would be so lonely without you. I am so grateful for our daily messages of support, encouragement, and humor as we figure out how to parent our children. I am so grateful to Jewish Baby University for these life-long friendships. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................. x CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 Family Purity ........................................................................................................... 4 Benefits of Family Purity ..................................................................................... 6 Family Purity in Biblical and Rabbinic Law ....................................................... 7 Outcomes of Family Purity ................................................................................ 10 2 MARITAL MAINTENANCE ............................................................................... 13 Theoretical Foundations ........................................................................................ 16 3 STUDY ONE: RELATIONAL DIALECTIC THEORY ..................................... 17 Assumptions of RDT ............................................................................................. 18 Research Question ................................................................................................. 20 Methods .................................................................................................................. 21 Interview Procedures .......................................................................................... 21 Recruitment ......................................................................................................... 22 Participants .......................................................................................................... 23 Procedures ........................................................................................................... 23 Measures and Instrumentation ........................................................................... 24 Qualitative Data Analysis ................................................................................... 24 Findings ................................................................................................................ 26 vi CHAPTER Page Dialectic of Integration: Connection-Autonomy ................................................. 27 No Questions Asked ......................................................................................... 27 Dialectic of (Un)Certainty: Novelty-Predictability ........................................... 28 Dialectic of Expression: Openness-Closedness ................................................. 30 Dialectic of Desire: Friend-Lover ...................................................................... 32 Maintenance during Niddah, the Mikveh Night, and Tehora ........................... 36 Maintenance during Niddah/ Navigating the dialectic of restraint ................ 36 Sexual Desire ................................................................................................. 36 Nurturing Friendship ..................................................................................... 37 Verbalizing Closeness ................................................................................... 39 Cognitive Maintenance .................................................................................. 40 Maintenance Behaviors: The Mikveh Night................................................... 42 Prioritizing “Your Day” ................................................................................ 42 Me Time ........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Halachic and Hashkafic Issues in Contemporary Society 91 - Hand Shaking and Seat Switching Ou Israel Center - Summer 2018
    5778 - dbhbn ovrct [email protected] 1 sxc HALACHIC AND HASHKAFIC ISSUES IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY 91 - HAND SHAKING AND SEAT SWITCHING OU ISRAEL CENTER - SUMMER 2018 A] SHOMER NEGIAH - THE ISSUES • What is the status of the halacha of shemirat negiah - Deoraita or Derabbanan? • What kind of touching does it relate to? What about ‘professional’ touching - medical care, therapies, handshaking? • Which people does it relate to - family, children, same gender? • How does it inpact on sitting close to someone of the opposite gender. Is one required to switch seats? 1. THE WAY WE LIVE NOW: THE ETHICIST. Between the Sexes By RANDY COHEN. OCT. 27, 2002 The courteous and competent real-estate agent I'd just hired to rent my house shocked and offended me when, after we signed our contract, he refused to shake my hand, saying that as an Orthodox Jew he did not touch women. As a feminist, I oppose sex discrimination of all sorts. However, I also support freedom of religious expression. How do I balance these conflicting values? Should I tear up our contract? J.L., New York This culture clash may not allow you to reconcile the values you esteem. Though the agent dealt you only a petty slight, without ill intent, you're entitled to work with someone who will treat you with the dignity and respect he shows his male clients. If this involved only his own person -- adherence to laws concerning diet or dress, for example -- you should of course be tolerant. But his actions directly affect you. And sexism is sexism, even when motivated by religious convictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Wedding Customs „ All Piskei Horav Yisroel Belsky Shlita Are Reviewed by Horav Yisroel Belsky Shlita
    Halachically Speaking Volume 4 l Issue 12 „ Compiled by Rabbi Moishe Dovid Lebovits „ Reviewed by Rabbi Benzion Schiffenbauer Shlita Wedding Customs „ All Piskei Horav Yisroel Belsky Shlita are reviewed by Horav Yisroel Belsky Shlita Lag B'omer will be upon us very soon, and for this is because the moon starts getting people have not been at weddings for a while. smaller and it is not a good simon for the Therefore now is a good time to discuss some chosson and kallah.4 Others are not so convinced of the customs which lead up to the wedding that there is a concern and maintain one may and the wedding itself. marry at the end of the month as well.5 Some are only lenient if the chosson is twenty years of When one attends a wedding he sees many age.6 The custom of many is not to be customs which are done.1 For example, concerned about this and marry even at the walking down the aisle with candles, ashes on end of the month.7 Some say even according to the forehead, breaking the plate, and the glass, the stringent opinion one may marry until the the chosson does not have any knots on his twenty-second day of the Hebrew month.8 clothing etc. Long Engagement 4 Chazzon Yeshaya page 139, see Shar Yissochor mamer When an engaged couple decide when they ha’yarchim 2:pages 1-2. 5 Refer to Pischei Teshuva E.H. 64:5, Yehuda Yaleh 2:24, should marry, the wedding date should not be Tirosh V’yitzor 111, Hisoreros Teshuva 1:159, Teshuva 2 too long after their engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strength of Social Norms Across Human Groups
    PPSXXX10.1177/1745691617708631Gelfand et al.Strength of Social Norms 708631research-article2017 Perspectives on Psychological Science 2017, Vol. 12(5) 800 –809 The Strength of Social Norms Across © The Author(s) 2017 Reprints and permissions: Human Groups sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708631 10.1177/1745691617708631 www.psychologicalscience.org/PPS Michele J. Gelfand1, Jesse R. Harrington1, and Joshua Conrad Jackson2 1University of Maryland and 2University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Abstract Social norms are a defining feature of human psychology, yet our understanding of them is still underdeveloped. In this article, we present our own cross-cultural research program on tightness-looseness (TL)—which draws on field, experimental, computational, and neuroscience methods—to illustrate how going beyond Western borders is critical for understanding social norms’ functions and their multilevel consequences. Cross-cultural research enables us to account for the universal features of norm psychology but also explains the great cultural diversity we see in social norms around the globe. Keywords culture, diversity, neuroscience, individual differences, environment Imagine a world where everyone drives on both sides around town, to having conversations, to running an of the road. There are stoplights but no one pays atten- organization turn into an uncoordinated mess. tion to them. Trains, buses, and airplanes don’t operate Perhaps because of their important role in human with any fixed schedule. In conversations, people don’t behavior, social norms have been a central topic of greet each other, interrupt each other frequently, and study in psychology. The earliest studies of normative invade each other’s space.
    [Show full text]
  • Halachic and Hashkafic Issues in Contemporary Society 24 - Must a Kallah Cover Her Hair - Part 1 Ou Israel Center - Summer 2016
    5776 - dbhbn ovrct [email protected] 1 sxc HALACHIC AND HASHKAFIC ISSUES IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY 24 - MUST A KALLAH COVER HER HAIR - PART 1 OU ISRAEL CENTER - SUMMER 2016 A] HAIR COVERING FOR MARRIED WOMEN A1] THE TORAH DERIVATION - SOTAH //// v tv Jt«r , t g rpU wv hbpk v tv , t i v«F v sh ng vu 1. jh:v rcsnc The head of the sotah was made ‘paru’a’ in public. What does ‘parua’ mean? ivk htbd atrv hukda ktrah ,ubck itfn 'v,uzck hsf tvrga ,ghke ,t r,ux - grpu 2. oa h"ar Rashi explains the expression ‘para’ to refer to untying the woman’s braids and learns from this that Jewish women must cover their head. How does he get from one to the other? grpu (jh:v rcsnc) unf ubukeu umna vkd,b /vkudn - gurp :h"ar) /o vhneC v­mnJk i º«r&vt v´«g rp(h F tU·v g­*rp h¬F o ºgv(, t Æv J«n tr³Hu 3. (vatv atr ,t vf:ck ,una Rashi clearly learns that the word ‘parua’ means ‘uncovered’. utk t,ga tuvvs kkfn grpu ch,fsn b"t ruxts kkfn vkguc kg ,utb,vk v,aga unf vsn sdbf vsn vkuubk hfv vk ibhscgsn 4. rehg ifu atr ,ugurp ,tmk ktrah ,ubc lrs iht vbhn gna ,uv vgurp /cg ,ucu,f h"ar Rashi on the Gemara gives two derivations for the halacha: (a) uncovering the woman’s hair was designed to be a public humiliation and thus we can infer that covering the hair in public is dignified; and (b) the need to uncover the hair of the married woman implies that married women’s hair was generally covered.
    [Show full text]
  • Korach June 23-24, 2017 Rosh Chodesh Tammuz 5777
    CONGREGATION BETH AARON ANNOUNCEMENTS Parshat Korach June 23-24, 2017 Rosh Chodesh Tammuz 5777 SHABBAT TIMES This week’s announcements are sponsored by Lamdeinu. Friday, June 23 For information on their schedule of classes, see page 4 and go to lamdeinu.org. Plag Mincha/Kabbalat Shabbat: 6:45 p.m. Study in depth; be inspired! Earliest Candles: 6:58 p.m. Early Mincha/Kabbalat Shabbat: 7:00 p.m. SCHEDULE FOR THE WEEK OF JUNE 25 Latest Candles: 8:13 p.m. Zman Mincha/Kabbalat Shabbat: Sun Mon Tues Wed Thu Fri 8:15 p.m. 25 26 27 28 29 30 Earliest Tallit 4:26 4:26 4:27 4:27 4:27 4:28 Shabbat, June 24 Hashkama Minyan: 7:30 a.m. Shacharit 6:20 MS 5:40 SH 5:55 SH 5:55 SH 5:40 SH 5:55 SH Nach shiur: 8:20 a.m. 7:15 SH 6:20 BM 6:30 BM 6:30 BM 6:20 BM 6:30 BM Main Minyan: 8:45 a.m. 8:00 MS 7:10 BM 7:15 BM 7:15 BM 7:10 BM 7:15 BM Sof Zman Kriat Shema: 9:11 a.m. 8:45 SH 8:00 BM 8:00 BM 8:00 BM 8:00 BM 8:00 BM Youth Minyan: 9:15 a.m. Mincha 1:45 BM Scholar-in-Residence Rabbi Zvi Grumet: following the Kiddush, “Winning the Mincha/ 8:15 MS 8:15 BM 8:15 BM 8:15 BM 8:15 BM 6:45 BM Battle but Losing the War” Maariv 7:00 MS Early Mincha: 1:45 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marriage Issue
    Association for Jewish Studies SPRING 2013 Center for Jewish History The Marriage Issue 15 West 16th Street The Latest: New York, NY 10011 William Kentridge: An Implicated Subject Cynthia Ozick’s Fiction Smolders, but not with Romance The Questionnaire: If you were to organize a graduate seminar around a single text, what would it be? Perspectives THE MAGAZINE OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR JEWISH STUDIES Table of Contents From the Editors 3 From the President 3 From the Executive Director 4 The Marriage Issue Jewish Marriage 6 Bluma Goldstein Between the Living and the Dead: Making Levirate Marriage Work 10 Dvora Weisberg Married Men 14 Judith Baskin ‘According to the Law of Moses and Israel’: Marriage from Social Institution to Legal Fact 16 Michael Satlow Reading Jewish Philosophy: What’s Marriage Got to Do with It? 18 Susan Shapiro One Jewish Woman, Two Husbands, Three Laws: The Making of Civil Marriage and Divorce in a Revolutionary Age 24 Lois Dubin Jewish Courtship and Marriage in 1920s Vienna 26 Marsha Rozenblit Marriage Equality: An American Jewish View 32 Joyce Antler The Playwright, the Starlight, and the Rabbi: A Love Triangle 35 Lila Corwin Berman The Hand that Rocks the Cradle: How the Gender of the Jewish Parent Influences Intermarriage 42 Keren McGinity Critiquing and Rethinking Kiddushin 44 Rachel Adler Kiddushin, Marriage, and Egalitarian Relationships: Making New Legal Meanings 46 Gail Labovitz Beyond the Sanctification of Subordination: Reclaiming Tradition and Equality in Jewish Marriage 50 Melanie Landau The Multifarious
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSGENDER JEWS and HALAKHAH1 Rabbi Leonard A
    TRANSGENDER JEWS AND HALAKHAH1 Rabbi Leonard A. Sharzer MD This teshuvah was adopted by the CJLS on June 7, 2017, by a vote of 11 in favor, 8 abstaining. Members voting in favor: Rabbis Aaron Alexander, Pamela Barmash, Elliot Dorff, Susan Grossman, Reuven Hammer, Jan Kaufman, Gail Labovitz, Amy Levin, Daniel Nevins, Avram Reisner, and Iscah Waldman. Members abstaining: Rabbis Noah Bickart, Baruch Frydman- Kohl, Joshua Heller, David Hoffman, Jeremy Kalmanofsky, Jonathan Lubliner, Micah Peltz, and Paul Plotkin. שאלות 1. What are the appropriate rituals for conversion to Judaism of transgender individuals? 2. What are the appropriate rituals for solemnizing a marriage in which one or both parties are transgender? 3. How is the marriage of a transgender person (which was entered into before transition) to be dissolved (after transition). 4. Are there any requirements for continuing a marriage entered into before transition after one of the partners transitions? 5. Are hormonal therapy and gender confirming surgery permissible for people with gender dysphoria? 6. Are trans men permitted to become pregnant? 7. How must healthcare professionals interact with transgender people? 8. Who should prepare the body of a transgender person for burial? 9. Are preoperative2 trans men obligated for tohorat ha-mishpahah? 10. Are preoperative trans women obligated for brit milah? 11. At what point in the process of transition is the person recognized as the new gender? 12. Is a ritual necessary to effect the transition of a trans person? The Committee on Jewish Law and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly provides guidance in matters of halkhhah for the Conservative movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Group Selection Plays an Essential Role in Explaining Human Cooperation: a Sketch of the Evidence
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2016), Page 1 of 68 doi:10.1017/S0140525X1400106X, e30 Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence Peter Richerson Emily K. Newton Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California– Department of Psychology, Dominican University of California, San Rafael, CA Davis, Davis, CA 95616 94901 [email protected] [email protected] http://emilyknewton.weebly.com/ www.des.ucdavis.edu/faculty/richerson/richerson.htm Nicole Naar Ryan Baldini Department of Anthropology, University of California–Davis, Graduate Group in Ecology, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA 95616 Davis, CA 95616 [email protected] https://sites.google.com/site/ryanbaldini/ [email protected] Adrian V. Bell Lesley Newson Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California– [email protected] http://adrianbell.wordpress.com/ Davis, Davis, CA 95616 [email protected] [email protected] Kathryn Demps https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lesley_Newson/ Department of Anthropology, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725 [email protected] Cody Ross http://sspa.boisestate.edu/anthropology/faculty-and-staff/kathryn- Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501 demps/ [email protected] http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=xSugEskAAAAJ Karl Frost Graduate Group in Ecology, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA 95616 Paul E. Smaldino [email protected] https://sites.google.com/site/karljosephfrost/ Department of Anthropology, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA 95616 [email protected] http://www.smaldino.com/ Vicken Hillis Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California– Timothy M.
    [Show full text]
  • SPIRITUAL JEWISH WEDDING Checklist
    the SPIRITUAL JEWISH WEDDING checklist created by Micaela Ezra dear friend, Mazal tov on your upcoming wedding! I am so happy you have found your way here. I have created this very brief “Spiritual Jewish Wedding Checklist” as a guide to use as you are planning your wedding. It evolved after a conversation with Karen Cinnamon of Smashing The Glass, in response to the need for more soulful Jewish wedding inspirations and advice online. So much of the organization (as essential as it is) can distract us from the true essence of the wedding day. I hope these insights and suggestions, can help keep you on track as you navigate the process, and that as a result, the day is as meaningful for you and your guests, as it is beautiful. I wish you an easy, joyful journey as you plan, and a sublime, euphoric wedding day! With love and Blessings, For more information, or to reach out, please visit www.micaelaezra.com www.ahyinjudaica.com ONE The lead up. What’s it all about? Get clear about what the meaning of the wedding is to you. Always have at the back of your mind the essence of what you’re working to- ward. It can help you to hold things in perspective. This is a holy and sacred day, in which two halves of a soul are reunited and with G-d’s blessing and participation. The rest is decoration. How Do You Want to Feel? Clearly define HOW YOU WANT TO FEEL at your wedding, and what you want your guests to feel.
    [Show full text]
  • Microculture in Organisations Hull
    2015-03-02 Micro Culture in Organisations What is it? Why does it matter? M. HEMADRI MBBS (Madras) FRCS (Edinburgh) MBA (Leicester) ATP (Intermountain) PSO (IHI) TMP (Kings Fund) ©M. HEMADRI Acknowledgement • Yorkshire and the Humber Leadership Academy • Health Education Yorkshire and the Humber 1 2015-03-02 My micro-world My micro culture CULTURE • CULTURE: the ideas, customs, and social behaviour of a particular people or society (Oxford English Dictionary) • Organizational culture is the behavior of humans within an organization and the meaning that people attach to those behaviors (Wikipedia) 2 2015-03-02 Culture in Society • Macro-culture • Context overlays (majority, overarching, dominant, large, common, visible. Historical time line related) • Small group macro-culture (Dominant micro-culture Representative-parliament Nonrepresentative- Oxbridge) MICRO CULTURE • Voluntary, short-lived, situation specific, ephemeral, non-verbal • Minority, weak, non-dominant, minimally visible • Powerful micro-culture (Think-tanks, extremists. ? Healthcare QI people) • Large group micro-cultures (women, ?unions?) • Yoga culture, Amish (not short lived) • SUBCULTURE 3 2015-03-02 • Macro-culture – similarity based (do not mind, understand and even tolerant of reduced values • Micro-culture – value (equality/morality/ethicality) based. Forced to tolerate ‘similarity’ • Subculture – difference/variance based MicroCulture • ALL MICROCULTURES • Structure • Activities – similar • Specifications/qualifications/knowledge – similar • ‘SUCCESSFUL MICROCULTURES’
    [Show full text]
  • Class, Style and Territory in the Drari Microcultures of Brussels
    societies Article Class, Style and Territory in the Drari Microcultures of Brussels Mattias De Backer 1,2 1 Department of Criminology, KU Leuven, Oude Markt 13, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; [email protected] 2 Department of Sociology, Université de Liège, Place du 20 Août 7, 4000 Liège, Belgium Received: 30 May 2019; Accepted: 25 August 2019; Published: 11 September 2019 Abstract: Much like Parsons’s notion of “youth culture,” the tradition of subculture developed by the Birmingham School was criticised as being too romantic, too general, and too dependent on a simplistic model based on the inside/outside binary. Since the 1990s, “post-subcultural” studies have developed which prefer to focus on agency rather than structure. A “third school” of youth cultural studies focused on medium sizes groups and their attachment to place, which they called “microcultures”. This paper, drawing from fieldwork undertaken in Brussels between 2013 and 2016 with young people, studies members of the Brussels “street culture” called the drari, while zooming in on the combinations of personalities, the events they share and the locations they make their own. Specifically, this paper argues that the drari microculture does not fit in the binary model of (post-)subcultural theory, nor in the criminological frame of urban youth gangs, by focusing on the affective and class-related phenomena internal to their practices of territory-building. Keywords: subcultures; microcultures; territory; class; Brussels youth 1. Introduction A whole set of “-cultures” has been coined by sociologists to refer to young people. “Youth culture” was first used as a concept by Talcott Parsons [1] in order to describe a set of professedly unique, distinctive patterns among young people, which emphasised values such as hedonism, consumption and irresponsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contemporary Jewish Legal Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Conflict with Halakha
    t HaRofei LeShvurei Leiv: The Contemporary Jewish Legal Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Conflict with Halakha Senior Honors Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Undergraduate Program in Near Eastern and Judaic Studies Prof. Reuven Kimelman, Advisor Prof. Zvi Zohar, Advisor In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts by Ezra Cohen December 2018 Accepted with Highest Honors Copyright by Ezra Cohen Committee Members Name: Prof. Reuven Kimelman Signature: ______________________ Name: Prof. Lynn Kaye Signature: ______________________ Name: Prof. Zvi Zohar Signature: ______________________ Table of Contents A Brief Word & Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………... iii Chapter I: Setting the Stage………………………………………………………………………. 1 a. Why This Thesis is Important Right Now………………………………………... 1 b. Defining Key Terms……………………………………………………………… 4 i. Defining Depression……………………………………………………… 5 ii. Defining Halakha…………………………………………………………. 9 c. A Short History of Depression in Halakhic Literature …………………………. 12 Chapter II: The Contemporary Legal Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Conflict with Halakha…………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 d. Depression & Music Therapy…………………………………………………… 19 e. Depression & Shabbat/Holidays………………………………………………… 28 f. Depression & Abortion…………………………………………………………. 38 g. Depression & Contraception……………………………………………………. 47 h. Depression & Romantic Relationships…………………………………………. 56 i. Depression & Prayer……………………………………………………………. 70 j. Depression &
    [Show full text]