Farnham and Hedgerley

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Farnham and Hedgerley Farnham and Hedgerley and This profile provides an overview of the latest available information for the new Farnham and Hedgerley ward, effective May 2015. As the Office for National Statistics ward data is not due to be updated until end 2015/2016, this information has been derived from Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs have a population of between 1,000 and 1,500) on a “best fit” basis. Where this is not available, data is given at parish or district level. On the map above, the green hashed areas with green boundaries represent LSOAs. The red boundaries are the new ward boundaries and brown is where the LSOA and new ward boundaries converge. Quick Statistics (please refer to relevant section for more detail): Total Population 6,917 Economically Active 72.6% Area (hectares) 1,640.8 Average Household Size 2.6 Unemployment 3.7% Population Density 4.2 Total Households 2,698 Disability claimants 1.8% Total Dwellings 2,817 1 Population (Source: Office for National Statistics licensed under the Open Government Licence v.1.0) Age structure Source: Mid year population estimates 2013 LSOA & district level In 2013, the population of Farnham and Hedgerley ward was 6,917. The age breakdown of the ward’s population is shown in the table below. Total 0 - 4 5 - 14 15 - 19 20 - 44 45 - 64 65 - 79 Over 80 Farnham and Hedgerley 6,917 347 985 381 1,714 1,988 1,050 452 Farnham and Hedgerley 5.0% 14.2% 5.5% 24.8% 28.7% 15.2% 6.5% (%) South Bucks 67,941 6.0% 12.0% 5.6% 27.6% 28.2% 14.4% 6.2% England & Wales 56,948,200 6.3% 11.4% 6.1% 33.5% 25.3% 12.7% 4.7% Working - age population as a percentage Working-Age Population of total population (18 to 65) Source: Mid year population estimates 2013 LSOA & 63.0% 62% district level 62.0% 61.0% 60.0% 59.1% Working-age refers to all individuals who were aged 59.0% between 18 and 65 years old. The working-age 58.0% population of Farnham and Hedgerley as a 57.0% 56.6% 56.0% percentage of the total, was 2.5% below the district 55.0% average. 54.0% 53.0% Farnham & Hedgerley South Bucks England and Wales Ethnicity Source: 2011 Census - Table KS201EW (Nomis Website) The largest ethnic group for this ward was the 0.76% 0.67% Farnham & Hedgerley Asian / Asian British group with 729 people. This 10.63% White incorporates the following: 2.42% Mixed/multiple ethnic 443 Indian groups 134 Pakistani Asian/Asian British 74 Chinese Black/African/Caribbean/ 85.52% Black British 60 other Asian Other ethnic group 18 Bangladeshi. Religion Source: Table : KS209EW England South South Religion stated as: Ward and Bucks East Based on information from the 2011 Wales Census information 62.7% of the Christian 62.7% 62.3% 59.8% 59.3% population of Farnham and Buddhist 0.3% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% Hedgerley stated their religion as Christian. 20.8% stated that they had Hindu 2.3% 2.5% 1.1% 1.5% no religion. Jewish 0.4% 0.4% 0.2% 0.5% Muslim 2.6% 2.5% 2.3% 4.8% Sikh 3.8% 4.7% 0.6% 0.8% Other religion 0.2% 0.3% 0.5% 0.4% No religion 20.8% 19.8% 27.7% 25.1% Religion not stated 6.7% 6.9% 7.4% 7.2% 2 Household Composition Source: Table : KS105EW, 2011 Married couples with children made up 28.5% of households, just more than the district average. Lone parent households with dependent children made up 3.9% of the ward’s households. Household Composition Ward Ward South Difference (Number) (%) Bucks average (%) Single non-pensionable households 356 13.2% 12.9% -0.5% Single pensioner 364 13.5% 14.0% -0.3% All other pensioner households 313 11.6% 10.9% 0.2% Married couple households: No children 345 12.8% 13.0% -0.6% Married couple households: With children 769 28.5% 26.9% 3.8% Cohabiting couple households: No children 109 4.0% 4.1% -0.2% Cohabiting couple households: With children 84 3.1% 3.6% 0.0% Lone parent households: With dependent children 104 3.9% 4.5% 0.2% Lone parent households: All children non- 69 2.6% 3.1% -0.7% dependent Other households: With dependent children 71 2.6% 3.0% -0.7% Other households: Other 114 4.2% 4.0% -1.0% Acorn Data Source: Acorn Data 2013, produced by CACI. Acorn Data provides data about the characteristics of people based on the postcode in which they live. Using data from a range of sources, every postcode is classified into one of five categories. This data provides useful information to start to understand the feelings, behaviours and expectations of each group. The number of households within Farnham and Hedgerley which fell into the Affluent Achievers category was 12.8% higher than the district average, with a combined similar percentage to the district averages in the Financially Stretched and Urban Adversity categories. 3 Population Projection Source: 2013-based sub national South Bucks Forecast ONS population projections, Office for 82000 National Statistics 80000 2012 to 2037 Population forecasts are available at 78000 district level only and take no account of planning strategies and policies nor 76000 that South Bucks is 87% Green Belt, 74000 with the consequent restrictions on dwelling numbers. 72000 Overall, the population is forecast to 70000 increase by 22.6% for South Bucks, 68000 against an overall England increase of 16.2%. The movement is estimated to 66000 be almost all due to net migration, 2012 2017 2022 2026 2030 2034 2037 mainly for other parts of England. The largest increase is in the 65+ age group, forecast to increase by 72.8% (to 23,500), against 65% for all of England. The largest percentage increase by group is the 85+ age group across South Bucks and England, with the numbers of over ninety-year olds in the district expected to more than double to 2,000. % Age Group 2012 2022 2030 2037 change 0-19 15,900 17,500 18,300 18,200 14.47% 20-64 38,000 39,400 39,900 40,800 7.37% 65+ 13,600 16,900 20,600 23,500 72.79% Total Population 67,400 73,900 78,800 82,600 22.55% Community (Source: Office for National Statistics licensed under the Open Government Licence v.1.0) Health (Source: 2011 Census) General Health Source: Table: 2.8% 0.7% QS302EW Farnham & Hedgerley 87.2% of people within Farnham and 9.3% Hedgerley declared themselves as having very good or good health. Very good health Good health People who declared themselves as having bad or very bad health in the Fair health 54.5% ward was 0.3% lower than the Bad health district average (3.5% for the ward 32.7% and 3.8% for the district). Very bad health Provision of Unpaid Care Source: Table: QS301EW 10.5% of the population within Farnham and Hedgerley provided some form of unpaid care. This equates to 721 people. The split is as follows: 553 people were providing 1-19 hours unpaid care a week 71 people were providing 20-49 hours unpaid care a week 97 people were providing 50 or more hours unpaid care a week 4 Housing (Source: Office for National Statistics licensed under the Open Government Licence v.1.0. ) Housing Tenure Source: Table: KS402EW Household Tenure Ward South England Bucks and Wales Owned: Outright or with a mortgage or loan 74.7% 73.4% 63.6% Shared Ownership: Part owned and part rented 2.3% 1.5% 0.8% Social Rented: Council / Housing Association / Registered Social 11.1% 12.3% 17.6% Landlord Private Rented: Private landlord or letting agency 10.2% 11.4% 16.7% Living Rent Free 1.7% 1.4% 1.4% 74.7% of housing within Farnham and Hedgerley was owned either outright or with a mortgage or loan. This was just above the district average. 11.1% of housing in the ward was social housing, lower than the district average. Accommodation Type Source: Table: KS402EW Farnham & Hedgerley 1.1% 0.1% 1.5% 0.1% Detached house or bungalow Semi-detached house or bungalow 13.6% Terraced house or bungalow Purpose built flat, maisonette or 49.8% 15.2% apartment Converted flat, maisonette or apartment Flat, maisonette or apartment: In 18.6% commercial building Caravan or other mobile or temporary structure Shared dwelling 49.8% of the accommodation within Farnham and Hedgerley were detached houses or bungalows, against 41% for South Bucks and 22.7% for all of England. Council Tax Banding Source: Valuation list for the authority on 17 February 2015 Council Tax information can provide an overview of house value within an area, however whilst they provide an indication, it should be noted that these bandings were created several years ago. This information is only available at a parish level rather than by ward. The percentage of houses falling in the G - H bands for Farnham parish is higher than the district average, with the opposite true for Hedgerley. Parish Dwelling Bands A-C Bands D-F Bands G-H Count Farnham 2466 1.6% 42.0% 56.4% Hedgerley 365 1.7% 60.5% 37.8% South Bucks District 28,288 5.4% 50.5% 44.1% 5 Crime Source: Thames Valley Police Crime Summary for South Bucks District as at 31st March 2011 Information on crime levels is produced at police neighbourhood level rather than by ward.
Recommended publications
  • Buckinghamshire. Gbi 2.17
    COURT DIRECTORY.] BUCKINGHAMSHIRE. GBI 2.17 Prancis Henry, 6 Tring I'd. Aylesbury Gee Rev. Richd. RA. Green st.Wycmb Gooowin Jose~h Piggott, 32 St. John Prancis John Badcock M.A. Rectory, Geeves Thomas, Twyford, Buckinghm street, Newport PagneIl Chelvey, Slough George Geo. Buckingham I'd. Winslow Gordon Rev. Arthur M.A. Middle Francis Miss, Fernhurst, Gerrards Gerrett Alfd. C. 24 Tring rd.Aylesbry Claydon, Steeple Claydon S.O Cross R.S.O Gibb Mrs. High street, Olney S.O Gordon Major Herbert, Westhorpep Franklin Mrs. Arthur E. The Lodge, Gibbons Charles, Oxford rd.Wycombe Little Marlow, Marlo,," Chartridge, Chesham R.S.O.; &. 29 Gibbons Mrs. 10 Silver st. Aylesbury Gordon H. Charles Oscar, Haddenham Pembridge gardens, London W Glbbs F. R. Claytons,Bourne End 8.0 hall, Thame Pranklin Joseph, Scotsgrove, Hadden- Gibbs Miss, 71 High street,Aylesbury Gordon Mrs. Hemingford villas Chil- ham! Th~me G~bbs N. Clifton ho. Datchet, Windsor tern road, Wendover, Tring , Frankl~n Miss,The Ferns,Newp~rtPgnll G~bbs Richard, Wa:ddesdon, Aylesbury Gore-Langton William Frederick, The­ Franklm Wm.s Manor st.Buckmgham Glbson Chas.31 High st.sth.OlneyS.O Lodge, Padbury, Buckingham Fraser Surgeon-Gen. Archibald Henry, Gibson George, Pauls row, Wycombe Gorham Rev. Harry Morton M.A.. The Grove, Slough Gibson Theodore F. Holly dale,Slough West street, Marlow Fraser D.Tickford pk.Newport Pagnell Gibson Thomas James, I Clifton gro. Gotto F. E. 80 High st.StonyStratford. Fraser H. The Thor~s, High st.Slough ,Uxbridge. road, Slou~h Gould Rev. Joseph M.A. Rectory, Free Arfd.
    [Show full text]
  • 53 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    53 bus time schedule & line map 53 Bracknell View In Website Mode The 53 bus line (Bracknell) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Bracknell: 6:50 AM - 7:18 PM (2) Wexham Court: 5:40 AM - 6:00 PM (3) Whitegrove: 7:50 AM - 5:50 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 53 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 53 bus arriving. Direction: Bracknell 53 bus Time Schedule 54 stops Bracknell Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 6:50 AM - 7:18 PM Wexham Park Hospital, Wexham Court Tuesday 6:50 AM - 7:18 PM Stoke House, Stoke Poges Wednesday 6:50 AM - 7:18 PM Stoke Park, Farnham Royal Thursday 6:50 AM - 7:18 PM Beaconsƒeld Road, Farnham Royal Civil Parish Friday 6:50 AM - 7:18 PM Farnham Lane, Britwell Travis Court, Britwell Civil Parish Saturday 8:05 AM - 6:07 PM The Britwell Centre, Britwell Wentworth Avenue, Britwell 53 bus Info Kennedy Park Shops, Britwell Direction: Bracknell Stops: 54 St George's Church, Britwell Trip Duration: 70 min Line Summary: Wexham Park Hospital, Wexham Lynch Pin Ph, Britwell Court, Stoke House, Stoke Poges, Stoke Park, Farnham Royal, Farnham Lane, Britwell, The Britwell 228 Long Furlong Drive, Slough Centre, Britwell, Wentworth Avenue, Britwell, Wordsworth Road, Britwell Kennedy Park Shops, Britwell, St George's Church, Britwell, Lynch Pin Ph, Britwell, Wordsworth Road, Britwell, Ramsey Court, Burnham, Grammar School, Ramsey Court, Burnham Burnham, Fairƒeld Road, Burnham, Gore Road, Shoreham Rise, Slough Burnham, Bredward Close, Lent Rise, Lent
    [Show full text]
  • Cliveden Gages, Taplow, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 0GB Asking Price £374,950 (Leasehold)
    Burnham Office: T: 01628 666632 E: [email protected] Cliveden Gages, Taplow, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 0GB Asking Price £374,950 (Leasehold) • 2.2 miles of Taplow Station (CROSSRAIL) • Two parking spaces • exclusively for those fifty-five and over • South Westerly facing garden terrace • No onward chain • Access to Cliveden estate THE PROPERTY: The accommodation briefly comprises a spacious entrance hall with storage cupboards, open plan living/dining room and fitted kitchen, shower room with w/c, second bedroom (fitted wardrobes) and master bedroom with spacious ensuite (fitted wardrobes). Taplow Train Station is located only 2.2 miles from the property which gives access to London Paddington and will form part of the upcoming Crossrail network offering services into central London and Canary Wharf. SITUATION: Taplow is well located for all amenities being only a short drive from Burnham, Beaconsfield and Maidenhead which offer a comprehensive range of shopping facilities. The M40 (Junction 2) can be joined at Beaconsfield linking with the M25. The M4 (Junction 7) also provides access to the M25 and the national road network giving access to London, Heathrow and the west. Taplow railway station is just under a mile away and offers services to Paddington and from Beaconsfield there is a service to Marylebone. Taplow is included within the Crossrail scheme. LEISURE FACILITIES: Sporting/leisure facilities abound in the area with many notable golf courses, riding and walking in Burnham Beeches. There are numerous sports clubs including tennis, rugby and football, various fitness centres and racing at Ascot and Windsor. The River Thames can also be accessed at Maidenhead, which is approximately 1 mile away.
    [Show full text]
  • Taplow Village Conservation Area
    South Bucks District Council Taplow Conservation Area Character Appraisal June 2007 Taplow Conservation Area CONTENTS Page Map of the conservation area 1 Chapter 1 – Introduction 2 Chapter 2 – Planning policy context 3 Chapter 3 – Location and setting 4 Chapter 4 – Origins, development and uses 5 Views map 9 Chapter 5 – Landscape and views 10 Chapter 6 – Streetscape and spaces 12 Chapter 7 – Buildings 15 Chapter 8 – Neutral/ negative features & enhancement opportunities 23 Sources & Acknowledgements 26 Appendices Map of listed and significant unlisted buildings A Designations: • Table of listed buildings B • Scheduled ancient monuments D • Historic parks and gardens D Table of significant unlisted buildings E Tree and hedge map G Map of historic walls H Historic Walls I Guidance for Residents L Historic maps N Consultation on this document P Contents Produced from the Ordnance Survey Digital Mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to Taplow Conservation Area prosecution or civil proceedings. South Bucks District Council LA100025874 2005 Taplow Conservation Area CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION The Taplow Conservation Area was originally designated by Beaconsfield District Council on 25th June 1975. As part of its programme to review all its conservation areas South Bucks District Council formulated proposals for amendments to the boundaries of the Taplow Conservation Area, having taken into account changes within the area and recent archaeological investigations as well as current legislation and guidance on conservation areas. Local residents were consulted on these proposals and invited to submit their comments by way of a questionnaire.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorney Parish News
    Dorney Parish NewV )HEUXDU\ 1 Providing Care, Comfort and Companionship in Burnham. Join us for “Tea for Two” on Tuesdays! Bring a friend to enjoy tea, freshly baked cakes, our newly decorated dining room and beautiful landscaped surroundings. We look forward to welcoming you, every second Tuesday of the month, at 2:30pm. Find us: Parliament Lane, Burnham, Slough, SL1 8NU Call us to find out more: on 01628 667345 Email: [email protected] 2 ISSUE NO. 1/19 FEBRUARY 2019 EDITORIAL As we enter a New Year, we are in the midst of a political crisis. A right wing group seeks to rise roughshod over relationships that have endured for decades. Many citizens would like to return to how it was in the 1960s. Others feel what they were promised in the 1970s is different to how things have turned out. Meanwhile, remainers are striving to find any legal means to prevent what the government intends. Yes, we have to face it – the plans for a Unitary Council in Buckinghamshire are not going well. As the erstwhile Bucks district councils plan legal action against the Secretary of State’s scheme, one wonders again just why our County Councillor is so, to use his phrase, ‘delighted’, at Mr Brokenshire’s decision. Some call for a ‘Buxit’ with us re-locating in the Royal Borough and I recommend Virginia Silvester’s article in this issue on the evolution of Bucks’ borders to get an idea of how Dorney came to be poised on the edge of two counties. Anybody reading the Parish Council minutes in this issue will see how our representatives believe that decisions over liaison with the M4 Project are being taken far to the north of Dorney.
    [Show full text]
  • South Bucks District Council
    /S2 HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSION 2005-06 CROSSRAIL PETITION Against the Bill - Praying to be heard by counsel, &c. TO THE HONOURABLE THE COMMONS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND IN PARLIAMENT ASSEMBLED. THE HUMBLE PETITION OF SOUTH BUCKS DISTRICT COUNCIL SHEWETH as follows :- 1. A Bill (hereinafter called "the Bill") has been introduced into and is now pending in your Honourable House intituled "A Bill to make provision for a railway transport system running from Maidenhead, in the County of Berkshire, and Heathrow Airport, in the London Borough of Hillingdon, through central London to Shenfield, in the County of Essex, and Abbey Wood, in the London Borough of Greenwich; and for connected purposes". 2. Clauses 1 to 20 set out the Bill's objectives in relation to the construction and operation of the railway transport system mentioned in paragraph 1 above. They include provision for compulsory acquisition, planning permission, heritage issues, trees, and noise. Clauses 21 to 44 of the Bill establish a regulatory regime for the railway transport system and clauses 45 to 59 of the Bill deal with miscellaneous and general provisions. P:\CROSSRAIL\S Bucks\Petition final.doc 3. The works proposed to be authorised by the Bill are specified in Schedule 1 to the Bill and the scheduled works are defined in the Bill as the works specified in Schedule 1 to the Bill which are works authorised to be constructed by the nominated undertaker (defined in the Bill and hereinafter referred to as "the nominated undertaker"). 4. Your petitioners are South Bucks District Council.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, ?Th August 1987
    10082 THE LONDON GAZETTE, ?TH AUGUST 1987 as part of the Conservation Area is Church Circle, the area of which Colnbrook: The rest of the area of open space at Crown Meadow, is bounded by the rear of the curtilages of those properties on the formerly part of the hostel site and now open Green Belt land and outside of the Circle. the area to the north and east of the church, including the old (818) Vicarage which is rural in character and by virtue of its Green Belt designation intended to remain so. See Map J. II. Land to be removed from the Area of Special Control of SOUTH BUCKS DISTRICT COUNCIL Advertisements TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 Beaconsfield: Areas at Holtspur, Copperfields, Ledborough Wood, Lakes Lane/Malthouse Square and between Burkes Town toid Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations Road/Grove Road and the Oxford Road. These areas share similar 1984 characteristics to the other built-up residential parts of the town and should be treated similarly for the purpose of advertisement Notice is hereby given that the South Bucks District Council in control. See Map A. exercise of its powers under Regulation 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1984, has Burnham: Areas in the vicinity of the Bishop Centre, the built-up submitted for the approval of the Secretary of State for the area south of the Bath Road, Lent Green/Gore Road, Wymers Environment an Order modifying the Bucks County Council Wood Road/Poyle Lane, Hogfair Lane/Green Lane/The Fairway Control of Advertisements (Area of Special Control) No.
    [Show full text]
  • 68 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    68 bus time schedule & line map 68 Maidenhead - Slough View In Website Mode The 68 bus line (Maidenhead - Slough) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Maidenhead Town Centre: 1:30 PM (2) Slough Town Centre: 10:15 AM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 68 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 68 bus arriving. Direction: Maidenhead Town Centre 68 bus Time Schedule 50 stops Maidenhead Town Centre Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday Not Operational Slough Bus Station, Slough Town Centre Tuesday 1:30 PM Landmark Place, Slough Town Centre Windsor Road, Slough Wednesday Not Operational Albert Street, Chalvey Thursday Not Operational Friday 1:30 PM Windsor Road Mcdonalds, Chalvey A332, Windsor Saturday Not Operational Pococks Lane, Eton Eton College, Eton 68 bus Info High Street, Eton Direction: Maidenhead Town Centre Sun Close, Windsor Stops: 50 Trip Duration: 63 min Brocas Street, Eton Line Summary: Slough Bus Station, Slough Town Brocas Street, Windsor Centre, Landmark Place, Slough Town Centre, Albert Street, Chalvey, Windsor Road Mcdonalds, Chalvey, High Street, Eton Pococks Lane, Eton, Eton College, Eton, High Street, Sun Close, Windsor Eton, Brocas Street, Eton, High Street, Eton, Keats Lane, Eton, Broken Furlong, Eton, Bunces Close, Eton Keats Lane, Eton Wick, The Walk, Eton Wick, Moores Lane, Eton Wick, Tilstone Avenue, Eton Wick, The Palmer Arms Ph, Broken Furlong, Eton Dorney, Dent's Corner, Dorney, Dorney Court, Dorney, Elm View Farm, Dorney, Harcourt Road,
    [Show full text]
  • Hedgerley Parish Council Comments on SBDC Ward Boundaries Consultation
    Hedgerley Parish Council Comments on SBDC Ward Boundaries Consultation Hedgerley Parish Council (HPC) is opposed to any change to the District Ward boundaries which would result in there being more than one District Councillor representing the Civil Parish of Hedgerley. This is because the single point of focus for District representation that exists now, and that works so well in the practical administration of Hedgerley, would be lost. We know that having one District Councillor to one or many parish Councils is effective. (The present District Councillor attends HPC and also Fulmer Parish Council meetings.) HPC appreciates that having many District Councillors to one Parish Council could be appropriate for large parishes. However HPC does not see how having many District Councillors to many Parish Councils could work at a practical level. Which of the District Councillors would attend HPC meetings? Would all of them attend? Perhaps there would be a rota, but how would there be continuity in addressing the issues pertinent to Hedgerley? In terms of alignment with other communities: According to the SBDC ward profile: the Hedgerley & Fulmer ward has a population of 1525, is made up of 12 hectares of buildings (0.9% of ward area) and 1112 hectares of green‐space (91% of ward area). In contrast the Farnham Royal ward has a population of 5218, is 24 hectares of buildings (6% of ward area) and just 197 hectares of green‐ space (49% of ward area). In summary, Hedgerley could be considered to be rural whereas Farnham Royal is largely residential. This difference in ward profile is further highlighted in the population density figures of 12.44 persons per hectare versus 1.12 persons per hectare for Hedgerley.
    [Show full text]
  • Mansard House, Pink Lane, Burnham, Buckinghamshire, SL1 8JP Asking Price £999,950 (Freehold)
    Burnham Office: T: 01628 666632 E: [email protected] Mansard House, Pink Lane, Burnham, Buckinghamshire, SL1 8JP Asking Price £999,950 (Freehold) • South facing garden measuring 85ft • Large driveway and double garage • 1 mile to Burnham Grammar School • 1.7 miles to Taplow Station (CROSSRAIL) • New kitchen (2014) • No onward chain THE PROPERTY: The ground floor accommodation comprises an entrance hall, cloakroom (WC), sitting room, dining room, family room, utility room and kitchen/breakfast room with doors opening onto the rear garden. On the first floor are five bedrooms, two ensuite bathrooms and the family bathroom. The landscaped rear garden is a delightful feature which extends to approximately 85ft in depth with lawn and patio areas which make the most of the southerly aspect. To the front aspect are further gardens and a sizeable gravel driveway which provides extensive off road parking and access to the detached double garage. Offered for sale with no onward chain. SITUATION: Burnham Village offers good local shopping facilities and the larger centres of Beaconsfield, Slough and Maidenhead are within easy reach and offer more extensive facilities. The M40 (junction 2) can be joined at Beaconsfield linking with the M25. The M4 (junction 7 approximately two miles away) also provides access to the M25 and the national road network giving access to London, Heathrow and the west. There is a mainline railway station in Burnham, offering services to Paddington and from Beaconsfield there is a service to Marylebone. Burnham is included within the Crossrail scheme which is scheduled for completion in 2019. EDUCATION / LEISURE FACILITIES: The surrounding area provides excellent schooling for children of all ages both in the private and state sector, the state sector still being run on the popular grammar school system.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiltern and South Bucks Townscape Character Study Part 3
    Chiltern & South Bucks District Councils Chiltern and South Bucks Townscape Character Study Part 3 November 2017 Chiltern & South Bucks District Councils Chiltern and South Bucks Townscape Character Study Part 3 Approved Dominic Watkins Position Director Date 10th November 2017 Revision FINAL CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 5 4.0 PLANNING AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES 151 1.1 Background 5 4.1 Introduction 151 1.2 Approach 7 4.2 Tightly Formed Centres 152 1.3 Review of Local Plan Policy Approaches 9 4.3 Clustered Centres 154 4.4 Woodland Roads 156 2.0 CHILTERN SETTLEMENTS 12 4.5 Green Suburban Roads 158 2.1 Amersham 13 4.6 Suburban Roads 160 2.2 Little Chalfont 21 4.7 Open Plan Suburban 162 2.3 Chesham 27 4.8 Formal Suburban 164 2.4 Chalfont St. Peter 34 4.9 Inconsistent Suburban 166 2.5 Chalfont St. Giles 41 4.10 Park Edge 172 2.6 Great Missenden 47 4.11 Town Centre Fringes 174 2.7 Prestwood 53 4.12 Out of Centre Commercial 178 2.8 Heath End 60 4.13 Apartments 180 2.9 Holmer Green 63 2.10 Knotty Green 66 2.11 Chesham Bois 73 2.12 Seer Green 80 2.13 Penn 87 2.14 Nashleigh Hill and Lycrome Road 90 3.0 SOUTH BUCKS SETTLEMENTS 93 3.1 Beaconsfield 94 3.2 Gerrards Cross 102 3.3 Denham Green 109 3.4 Burnham 112 3.5 Farnham Common 116 3.6 Farnham Royal 119 3.7 Stoke Poges 122 3.8 Iver Heath 125 3.9 Iver Village 131 3.10 Richings Park 135 3.11 New Denham and Willowbank 140 3.12 Taplow Riverside 143 3.13 Denham 146 November 2017 CHILTERN & SOUTH BUCKS TOWNSCAPE CHARACTER STUDY PART 3 11125601-TCS-F-Report-1.0.indd Chris Blandford Associates CHILTERN & SOUTH BUCKS TOWNSCAPE CHARACTER STUDY PART 3 November 2017 Chris Blandford Associates 11125601-TCS-F-Report-1.0.indd 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Natural Beauty (AONB), which also extends into South Bucks, covering protecting existing townscape character.
    [Show full text]
  • Maidenhead Bridge Proposed Work
    W01-W05.Maidenhead 25/8/04 5:19 PM Page 1 W1.1 Maidenhead Bridge Proposed Work The Maidenhead Bridge over the River Thames at Maidenhead is a Grade II* listed structure. Installation of overhead electrification on top of the structure would be required. The design is being undertaken in conjunction with heritage specialists to help ensure that the impact on the structure is acceptable. Once installed, the gantries are likely to be visible on the bridge from viewpoints along the river and nearby. As an example, electrification for the Heathrow Express involved the provision of overhead electrification over Wharncliffe Viaduct in Ealing. Wharncliffe Viaduct Example of similar overhead electrification installations. Maidenhead Bridge www.crossrail.co.uk Helpdesk 0845 602 3813 Crossing the Capital Connecting the UK W01-W05.Maidenhead 25/8/04 5:19 PM Page 2 W2.1 Maidenhead Maidenhead Stabling & Turnback It is proposed that a stabling facility be provided for up I Operational noise from the use of the sidings to 6 Crossrail trains in the former goods yard to the I Dust impact on nearby buildings during west of Maidenhead station, immediately beyond the construction. Appropriate dust mitigation junction of the Bourne End Branch. techniques would be incorporated within the The proposals are to modify the track layout and train Crossrail Construction Code in order to reduce sidings at Maidenhead to enable Crossrail trains to be the risk of a dust nuisance being caused. The reversed with a new siding to be developed within the Construction Code would require the establishment existing Network Rail sidings.
    [Show full text]