Cultural Geography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cultural Geography Cultural Geography David Atkinson Peter Jackson David Sibley Neil Washbourne Cultural Geography Cultural Geography A Critical Dictionary of Key Concepts Edited by David Atkinson Peter Jackson David Sibley Neil Washbourne Published in 2005 by I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd 6 Salem Road, London W2 4BU 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 www.ibtauris.com In the United States and Canada distributed by Palgrave Macmillan, a division of St. Martin’s Press, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 Copyright © David Atkinson, Peter Jackson, David Sibley and Neil Washbourne, 2005 The rights of David Atkinson, Peter Jackson, David Sibley and Neil Washbourne to be identified as the authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or any part thereof, may not be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. International Library of Human Geography 3 ISBN Hardback 1 86064 703 0 Paperback 1 86064 702 2 EAN Hardback 978 1 86064 703 1 Paperback 978 1 86064 702 4 A full CIP record for this book is available from the British Library A full CIP record for this book is available from the Library of Congress Library of Congress catalog card: available Typeset in Ehrhardt by Dexter Haven Associates Ltd, London Printed and bound in Great Britain by MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin Contents Editors’ Preface: On Cultural and Critical Geographies vii PART I: SPACE, KNOWLEDGE AND POWER Introduction 3 Post-structuralism Ulf Strohmayer 6 Representation Ola Söderström 11 Positionality/ Ian Cook et al. 16 Situated Knowledge Mapping/Cartography Denis Cosgrove 27 Travel/Tourism Mike Crang 34 Space/Place Phil Hubbard 41 Landscape Don Mitchell 49 Environment Sally Eden 57 Geopolitics Gearóid Ó Tuathail/ 65 Gerard Toal Governance Andrew Jonas and 72 Aidan While Flexibility Suzanne Reimer 80 PART II: DIFFERENCE AND BELONGING Introduction 89 The Body Robyn Longhurst 91 Identity James Martin 97 Gender Peter Jackson 103 Whiteness Alastair Bonnett 109 (Dis)ability Robert Wilton 115 Sexuality Mark Johnson 122 Moral Geographies Tim Cresswell 128 Citizenship Darren O’Byrne 135 Heritage David Atkinson 141 PART III: BORDERS AND BOUNDARIES Introduction 153 Private/Public David Sibley 155 Globalisation/ Neil Washbourne 161 Globality Postmodernism Steven Flusty 169 Colonialism/ Alison Blunt 175 Postcolonialism Diaspora Anne-Marie Fortier 182 Hybridity Katharyne Mitchell 188 Nature/Culture Steve Hinchliffe 194 Socio-technical Nick Bingham 200 Cyborg Cultures Judith Tsouvalis 207 Contributors 213 Index 215 — Editors’ Preface — On Cultural and Critical Geographies Cultural geography is an exciting, lively and diverse field, the energy and vitality of which is indicated by our decision to pluralise the term in this editorial preface. Cultural geographies, as currently practised, are now much wider in scope than developments within a single branch of human geography. As the essays that follow make clear, cultural geographers now routinely engage with complex but important questions about social processes such as identity formation, the construction of cultural difference, citizenship and belonging. These processes also challenge our understanding of such core geographical categories as space and place, landscape and environment, public and private. But cultural geographies, we argue, also link such ideas and imaginations with our changing material world. They allow us to explore how these processes are affected by increased mobility, by changes in our socio-technical environment, and by other forces that are transforming the established notions of the relationships between nature and culture. As several of the following chapters reveal, cultural geographies are also engaging with political and economic ideas about governance and flexible accumulation as the boundaries between former sub-disciplines such as cultural and economic, social and political geography, are increasingly transcended. Indeed, through its engagement with social and cultural theory, the entire field of cultural geography has been transformed, and its recent developments have prompted the rethinking of many key concepts in human geography and beyond. In addition, there are now many other social scientists as well as geographers ‘doing’ cultural geography (as contributors to this book themselves confirm). The diversity of cultural geography defies easy definition. For example, the recent Handbook of Cultural Geography elected not to define the field but, rather, described cultural geography as an unruly affair best understood as a ‘style of thought’, without clearly identifiable boundaries, characterised by the valid and urgent questions that it seeks to ask (Anderson et al. 2002, xiii–xiv). In more conventional terms, it suggests that cultural geography addresses issues of distribution (where things are and why); ways of life; systems of meaning; questions of practice; and vii CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY notions of power. In this collection we take a similar approach: allowing the individual essays and their authors to define the field, since more formal definitions immediately lead to problems of closure and exclusion. We would rather think of the essays that make up this creative and fuzzily bounded collection of cultural geographies as open-ended and post-disciplinary. This is reflected in their authorship: although the contributors to this volume have disciplinary identities including social anthropology, sociology, cultural studies and human geography, they are all producing cultural geographies and, in the process, they demonstrate theoretical convergences as well as refreshing differences in perspective. Yet one thing we did encourage from our contributors was a critical perspective on cultural geographies. By engaging with aspects of social relations, with connections between people and the material world, and between culture and nature, the authors raise questions that are central to human well-being, but that are also political. Since cultural geographies are embedded in the politics of our contemporary world, inevitably this collection is avowedly critical in places. Several essays deal with questions of cultural difference, for example, a characteristic of societies for which, as Joel Kahn (1995, 125) has argued, we now have ‘a consuming and erotic passion’. But, while cultural difference is celebrated in some realms, we must also acknowledge that difference becomes politicised when providing grounds for genocide as well as for routine, everyday oppression (as the recent history of the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda demonstrates). The political is often inescapable, and our authors reflect upon a range of political issues, such as the changing relationships between public and private space, anxieties about surveillance and the intrusion of the state into private lives, the connections between culture and nature, and environmental crises. Given the ways that power is embedded throughout society, we suggest that, in their theoretical articulation and in their engagement with social relations and questions of human well-being, cultural geographies – above all else – must be critical. Although the re-invigoration of cultural geography in the early 1980s bore a marked critical edge (Cosgrove 1983, 1984; Cosgrove and Jackson 1987; Daniels 1989), the relationship between cultural geographies and a politicised perspective has proved controversial more recently. Some argue that cultural geography has lost its original critical impetus and plead for a more politicised agenda (Mitchell 2000). For others, the intangible subject matter of some cultural geography has diminished the relevance of human geography more generally, particularly when addressing practical social issues (Hamnett 2003; Storper 2001). Sympathetic voices worry that certain strains of social and cultural geography lose sight of the material geographies that underpin social worlds (Philo 2000; Jackson 2000; cf. Anderson and Tolia-Kelly 2004), while, as several authors highlight, the politics of actually doing critical geography varies markedly around the world (Garcia-Ramon et al. 2004; Sundberg 2005). Although far from conclusive, this debate draws attention to the relations between cultural geographies, socio-political contexts, and the politics of the knowledge we produce, disseminate and consume. And, because the history of cultural geography, as we understand it, has a substantive and enduring strain of viii PREFACE critique, this collection seeks to explore the critical concepts in cultural geography further. In this respect, the book’s subtitle uses the term ‘critical’ in two ways. First, it addresses as ‘critical concepts’ those that are fundamentally important to the emergence and form of cultural geography, those that provide the foundation and building blocks of our contemporary work in this area. Second, it refers to the ‘critical’ in terms of critique. The book serves both these meanings, but, as the second is more contentious, the rest of this introduction explores the potential for ‘critical’ perspectives in relation to the production of cultural geographies. IN WHAT SENSE ‘CRITICAL’ KNOWLEDGE? The project of developing ways of thinking critically (and reflexively) about the production of knowledge has a long and contested history that draws upon various theoretical
Recommended publications
  • Contemporary China: a Book List
    PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: Woodrow Wilson School, Politics Department, East Asian Studies Program CONTEMPORARY CHINA: A BOOK LIST by Lubna Malik and Lynn White Winter 2007-2008 Edition This list is available on the web at: http://www.princeton.edu/~lynn/chinabib.pdf which can be viewed and printed with an Adobe Acrobat Reader. Variation of font sizes may cause pagination to differ slightly in the web and paper editions. No list of books can be totally up-to-date. Please surf to find further items. Also consult http://www.princeton.edu/~lynn/chinawebs.doc for clicable URLs. This list of items in English has several purposes: --to help advise students' course essays, junior papers, policy workshops, and senior theses about contemporary China; --to supplement the required reading lists of courses on "Chinese Development" and "Chinese Politics," for which students may find books to review in this list; --to provide graduate students with a list that may suggest books for paper topics and may slightly help their study for exams in Chinese politics; a few of the compiler's favorite books are starred on the list, but not much should be made of this because such books may be old or the subjects may not meet present interests; --to supplement a bibliography of all Asian serials in the Princeton Libraries that was compiled long ago by Frances Chen and Maureen Donovan; many of these are now available on the web,e.g., from “J-Stor”; --to suggest to book selectors in the Princeton libraries items that are suitable for acquisition; to provide a computerized list on which researchers can search for keywords of interests; and to provide a resource that many teachers at various other universities have also used.
    [Show full text]
  • 10.7251/Her1115001g
    U UDC 911.3:930.85 PY F – W IKTIVFZN?K R ,1 1I , , W: + ++ . A (Sauer, 1925), + * (Géographie humaine). N – , + . H . ? \, # - . \* + , . : , , , , . Scienti[ c review paper CONCEPT OF CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY AS A SCIENCE Mirko Gr6i41 1Faculty of Geography at Belgrade University, Republic Serbia Abstract: Cultural geography was created as a reaction on geographic determinism and static descriptive approach in researching of the characteristics of cultural elements and forms distribution in classical anthropogeography. An American geographer Carl Sauer (1925) is considered to be its founder, although its aspects were present in Anthropogeography and Human geography (Géographie humaine) before. Even today, Cultural geography is de[ ned differently - as a strict science with its methodological apparatus, or as an aspect or way of looking in geography. Sauer has de[ ned this science in the spirit of possibilistic concept of geography of Paul Vidal de la Blache. In the spirit of this concept Jovan Cviji4’s Serbian anthropogeography school was developed, which also has expressive cultural-geographical aspect. The aim of this paper is to discuss issues of subject and methodological essence of Cultural geography in the light of different approaches and directions of development. Key words: Cultural geography, culturology, anthropogeography, cultural landscape, landshaft. ________________________________________________________________________________________________ HTJ INTRODUCTION V (. culture – #+, The word culture (lat. culture - cultivation, ) production) appeared in French language (XIII (XIII ), - century), followed by the words of a cultiva- – # * (agriculture, tor and cultivate - to cultivate the land (agri- civiculture, horticulture). X culture, civic culture, horticulture). It had to be „“ , .. - followed by “cultivating” the man, i.e. spiri- 1 NT ]NB MIRKO GR5I3 . H (XVIII tual culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Places Post-Colonialism Forgot (And How to Find Them)
    Introduction: Places Post-Colonialism Forgot (and How to Find Them) David Butz1 Brock University [email protected] The four papers in this themed issue had their first public airing in a session titled “Places Post-Colonialism Forgot: New Examinations of Center and Periphery” at the 2009 Las Vegas AAG Meetings. The session was co-organised by Karen Morin and Tamar Rothenberg, and sponsored by the Indigenous Peoples Specialty Group, the Socialist and Critical Geography Specialty Group, and the Historical Geography Specialty Group; I was one of the discussants. The papers’ thematic coherence as a set hinges on two similarities. Each piece focuses on something that its author or authors think post-colonial analysis has overlooked or excluded – ways that groups constitute themselves, experiences of subordination, diasporic identities, and ongoing peripheralizations. And each paper deals in its way with the effects of centre/periphery dichotomies. Pamela Shurmer-Smith provides a glimpse at the remembrances, lives and identities of former White Northern Rhodesians who now, in diaspora, find themselves in locations that are peripheral to what remain the geographical centres of their identity; Ian Baird argues that the core concepts of post-colonial studies peripheralize certain instances of colonialism; Ellis draws from her research on middle class political formations in Chennai, India, to criticize post-colonial scholarship on India for relegating class to the peripheries of its analyses; Karen Morin and Tamar Rothenberg draw attention to pervasive centre/periphery binaries 1 Creative Commons licence: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 2011, 10 (1), 42-47 43 in the social and spatial configuration of higher education.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth World Nation: a Critical Geography of Decline
    FOURTH WORLD NATION: A CRITICAL GEOGRAPHY OF DECLINE by Olon Frederick Dotson A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of American Studies West Lafayette, Indiana August 2019 2 THE PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL STATEMENT OF COMMITTEE APPROVAL Dr. Bill Mullen, Chair College of Liberal Arts, American Studies Dr. Leonard Harris College of Liberal Arts, American Studies Dr. Cornelius Bynum College of Liberal Arts, American Studies Dr. Stephen Paul O’Hara Xavier University, Department of History Approved by: Dr. Rayvon Fouché Head of the Graduate Program 3 This research effort is dedicated to Cloice C. Dotson. Without exception, you have been all that a father is supposed to be. If I could only begin to approach the level of responsibility and devotion that you have demonstrated as a father and mentor to me, you can be assured that your grandchildren, and someday, their children, will be able to make their way in this Fourth World Nation. With love and gratitude, Your son. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My late mother, my motherly stepmother, my sisters and brother, my friends and colleagues Wes, Lisa, Karen, Pam, Ted, Nihal, John, Michael and John, staff and faculty at Ball State, (first encouraged me to pursue doctoral studies) my Committee Chair: Bill Mullen, and Committee Members, Leonard Harris and Cornelius L. Bynum, my external committee member S. Paul O’Hara, Richard Hogan, Nathalia Jaramillo, Rayvon Fouche’, folk in the trenches, the late Grace Lee Boggs, the late Reverend Emory Davis, Malik Yakini, Imhotep Adisa, Pam Dorr, David Elkins, Wayne Curtis, Myrtle Thompson, Sylvester Brown, Elizabeth Patton-Whiteside.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Geography. Different Encounters, Encountering Difference
    DAG 50 001-140 9/4/08 18:39 Página 105 Doc. Anàl. Geogr. 50, 2007 105-120 Cultural geography. Different encounters, encountering difference Robyn Longhurst University of Waikato. Department of Geography, Tourism and Environmental Planning Private Bag 3105. Hamilton. New Zealand [email protected] Data de recepció: agost del 2007 Data d’acceptació definitiva: setembre del 2007 Abstract In the first half of this paper it is argued that cultural geography is a dynamic and diverse field that extends well beyond a single branch of human geography. The boundaries between it and other sub-disciplines are often blurred. People have «different» encounters with cul- tural geography depending on their sub-disciplinary convergences. People also have dif- ferent encounters with cultural geography depending on where they live and work. «Place matters» in the construction, production and representation of cultural geography. It takes different forms in different places. In the second half of the paper it is argued that as cul- tural geography continues to encounter «difference» in many guises, four possible future trends are likely: first, it is probable that there will be continued growth in cultural geog- raphy; second, there may be mounting recognition that cultural geography needs to be critical offering possibilities for radical critique and reflection; third, cultural geographers are likely to continue with their efforts to think about what, if anything, might lie beyond representation; and finally, cultural geographers are likely to deepen their reflections on the politics of knowledge production leading to more multi-language publishing practices in this area. Key words: bodies, critical approach, cultural geography, emotions, place.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah A. Elwood University of Washington Department of Geography Box 353550 Seattle, WA 98195 [email protected] 206.616.5238 Educat
    Sarah A. Elwood University of Washington Department of Geography Box 353550 Seattle, WA 98195 [email protected] 206.616.5238 Education University of Minnesota Ph.D. 2000 Geography University of Minnesota M.A. 1996 Geography Macalester College B.A. 1994 Geography Academic Employment Chair, Department of Geography, University of Washington (2018– ) Professor, Department of Geography, University of Washington (2011– ) Associate Professor, Department of Geography, University of Washington (2008–2011) Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, University of Washington (2006–2008) Assistant Professor, Geography & Regional Development, University of Arizona (2004–2006) Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, DePaul University (2000–2004) Affiliations Fellow, Urban@ UW Homelessness Research Initiative (2017–2019) Interdisciplinary PhD Program in Urban Design & Planning, University of Washington Faculty Affiliate, West Coast Poverty Center, University of Washington Faculty Affiliate, Certificate in Public Scholarship, Simpson Center for the Humanities, University of Washington Research Affiliate, Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology, University of Washington Science, Technology, and Society Interdisciplinary Committee, University of Washington Faculty Advisory Board, New Maps Plus Graduate Certificate and MS Program, University of Kentucky Advisory Board, Points Unknown (Columbia University School of Journalism project on creative cartographies in journalism) Association of American Geographers (Specialty Groups: Urban Geography, Geographic Information Science, Geographic Perspectives on Women, Qualitative Methods) Awards 2017, 2016, 2012, 2010, 2009. Student Award for Faculty Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching, UW Department of Geography 2012. University of Washington Distinguished Teaching Award 2011. Sustainable Community Outstanding Leadership Award (Individual Innovator), Sustainable Seattle 2010. Geographic Perspectives on Women’s Annual Book Recognition, Association of American Geographers (for Qualitative GIS: A Mixed Methods Approach) 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Redgrove Papers: Letters
    Redgrove Papers: letters Archive Date Sent To Sent By Item Description Ref. No. Noel Peter Answer to Kantaris' letter (page 365) offering back-up from scientific references for where his information came 1 . 01 27/07/1983 Kantaris Redgrove from - this letter is pasted into Notebook one, Ref No 1, on page 365. Peter Letter offering some book references in connection with dream, mesmerism, and the Unconscious - this letter is 1 . 01 07/09/1983 John Beer Redgrove pasted into Notebook one, Ref No 1, on page 380. Letter thanking him for a review in the Times (entitled 'Rhetoric, Vision, and Toes' - Nye reviews Robert Lowell's Robert Peter 'Life Studies', Peter Redgrove's 'The Man Named East', and Gavin Ewart's 'The Young Pobbles Guide To His Toes', 1 . 01 11/05/1985 Nye Redgrove Times, 25th April 1985, p. 11); discusses weather-sensitivity, and mentions John Layard. This letter is pasted into Notebook one, Ref No 1, on page 373. Extract of a letter to Latham, discussing background work on 'The Black Goddess', making reference to masers, John Peter 1 . 01 16/05/1985 pheromones, and field measurements in a disco - this letter is pasted into Notebook one, Ref No 1, on page 229 Latham Redgrove (see 73 . 01 record). John Peter Same as letter on page 229 but with six and a half extra lines showing - this letter is pasted into Notebook one, Ref 1 . 01 16/05/1985 Latham Redgrove No 1, on page 263 (this is actually the complete letter without Redgrove's signature - see 73 .
    [Show full text]
  • THE CULTURAL APPROACH in GEOGRAPHY: PRACTICES and NARRATIVES Paul CLAVAL University of Paris-Sorbonne, France
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenstarTs THE CULTURAL APPROACH IN GEOGRAPHY: PRACTICES AND NARRATIVES Paul CLAVAL University of Paris-Sorbonne, France 1. Introduction What does the cultural approach offer to geography? In order to answer this question, we have carried out two types of analyses: 1- we examined the 90 communications presented duing the Conference of our Commission in Rio de Janeiro on 10-12 June 2003; 2- we compared recents books on cultural geography : those of Mike Crang (1998) for Britain, Giuliana Andreotti (1996-1997) and Adalberto Vallega (2003) for Italy, Boris Grésillon (2002) for France and Don Mitchell (2000) for the United States. The conceptions I have personally developed served as counterpoints in this analysis (Claval, 1995-2002). 2. Cultural geographers at work: the Conference of Rio de Janeiro The Conference of Rio de Janeiro dealt with The Historical Dimensions of the Relationships Between Space and Culture (Abreu M., 2003). Some colleagues explored directly the way culture shapes temporalities and spatialities. Most have chosen to start from the research they normally develop in order to show how culture imposes its marks on space and duration: their papers offer in an overview of the objects and practices of contemporary cultural geography. 2.1. Culture and the qualitative differenciation of space Some communications deal with: (i) the relations between human groups and the natural environment they live in; (ii) the significance they give to Cosmos, Earth and Life in this World through the religious beliefs they profess and the ceremonies and rituals they perform; (iii) the procedures of political regulation they mobilize.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Political Geography 2020
    February 2020 California’s Political Geography 2020 Eric McGhee Research support from Jennifer Paluch Summary With the 2020 presidential election fast approaching, attention turns to how public views may shape the outcome. California is often considered quite liberal, with strong support for the Democratic Party—but the state encompasses many people with differing political views. In this report, we examine California’s political geography to inform discussion for this election season and beyond. Our findings suggest the state continues to lean Democratic and Donald Trump is unpopular virtually everywhere. As California leans more Democratic in general, conservative Democrats are becoming rarer even in the places where they used to be common; meanwhile, independents, also known as No Party Preference voters, are leaning slightly more Republican in many parts of the state. However, many issues have their own geographic patterns: Most Californians from coast to interior feel their taxes are too high, and Californians almost everywhere believe immigrants are a benefit to the state. Concern about the cost of housing shows sharp divides between the coast and the interior, though Californians are concerned in most parts of the state. Support for the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) is lukewarm in most places. Even as support for the Democratic Party has strengthened in general, and opinions on some policy issues have grown more polarized in parts of the state, a closer look indicates that registering all eligible residents to vote might actually moderate the more strongly partisan places. Broad Geographic Patterns Today, California is widely understood to be a solidly Democratic state. All statewide elected officials are Democrats, including both United States senators and the governor.
    [Show full text]
  • DELIVERABLE D3.2 Survey of Data Models, Ontologies and Standards in the Wider Energy Efficient Buildings Domain
    Ref. Ares(2019)5483631 - 30/08/2019 Project Acronym: BIMERR Project Full Title: BIM-based holistic tools for Energy-driven Renovation of existing Residences Grant Agreement: 820621 Project Duration: 42 months DELIVERABLE D3.2 Survey of data models, ontologies and standards in the wider Energy Efficient Buildings domain Deliverable Status: Final File Name: D3.2. Survey of data models ontologies and standards v1.0.docx Due Date: 31/08/2019 (M8) Submission Date: 30/08/2019 (M8) Task Leader: UPM (T3.2) Dissemination level Public X Confidential, only for members of the Consortium (including the Commission Services) This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement n°820621 The BIMERR project consortium is composed of: Fraunhofer Gesellschaft Zur Foerderung Der Angewandten Forschung FIT Germany E.V. CERTH Ethniko Kentro Erevnas Kai Technologikis Anaptyxis Greece UPM Universidad Politecnica De Madrid Spain UBITECH Ubitech Limited Cyprus SUITE5 Suite5 Data Intelligence Solutions Limited Cyprus Hypertech (Chaipertek) Anonymos Viomichaniki Emporiki Etaireia HYPERTECH Greece Pliroforikis Kai Neon Technologion MERIT Merit Consulting House Sprl Belgium XYLEM Xylem Science And Technology Management Gmbh Austria GU Glassup Srl Italy Anonymos Etaireia Kataskevon Technikon Ergon, Emporikon CONKAT Greece Viomichanikonkai Nautiliakon Epicheiriseon Kon'kat BOC Boc Asset Management Gmbh Austria BX Budimex Sa Poland UOP University Of Peloponnese Greece EXE Exergy Ltd United Kingdom HWU Heriot-Watt University United Kingdom NT Novitech As Slovakia FER Ferrovial Agroman S.A Spain Disclaimer BIMERR project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement n°820621.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Political Geography
    1 The Politics of Political Geography Guntram H. Herb INTRODUCTION case of political geography, the usual story is of a heyday characterized by racism, imperialism, and ‘La Géographie, de nouveau un savoir politique’ war in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, (Geography: once again a political knowledge). followed by a period of stagnation and decline in the 1950s, and finally a Phoenix-like revival (Lacoste, 1984) that started in the late 1960s and now seems to be coming to a lackluster end with the cooptation This statement by the chief editor of Hérodote, of key issues of ‘politics’ and ‘power’ by other intended to celebrate the politicization of French sub-disciplines of geography. However, as David geography through the journal in the 1970s and Livingstone has pointed out so aptly, the history of 1980s, also, and paradoxically, captures a profound geography, and by extension, political geography, dilemma of contemporary political geography. If, cannot be reduced to a single story (Livingstone, as a recent academic forum showed, the political 1995). There are many stories and these stories is alive and well in all of geography, does this not are marked by discontinuities and contestations, in question the continued relevance and validity of other words, ‘messy contingencies’, which compli- having a separate sub-field of political geography cate things (Livingstone, 1993: 28). (Cox and Low, 2003)? The most fruitful response A further problem is what one should include to such existential questions about academic sub- under the rubric ‘political geography’: publica- disciplines is delving into the past and tracing the tions of scholars, the work of professional academic genesis of the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Radical/Critical Geography Within North America
    The Emergence of Radical/Critical Geography within North America Linda Peake1 Urban Studies Program, Department of Social Science York University, Canada [email protected] Eric Sheppard Department of Geography University of California, Los Angeles, USA [email protected] Abstract In this paper we aim to provide a historical account of the evolution of Anglophone radical/critical geography in North America. Our account is structured chronologically. First, we examine the spectral presence of radical / critical geography in North America prior to the mid-sixties. Second, we narrate the emergence of both radical and critical geography between 1964 / 1969 until the mid-1980s, when key decisions were taken that moved radical / critical geography into the mainstream of the discipline. Third, we examine events since the mid- 1980s, as radical geography merged into critical geography, becoming in the process something of a canon in mainstream Anglophone human geography. We conclude that while radical / critical geography has succeeded in its aim of advancing critical geographic theory, it has been less successful in its aim of 1 Published under Creative Commons licence: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2 Eric’s first exposure was as an undergraduate at Bristol in 1971 when the newly hired lecturer Keith Bassett, freshly returned from Penn State, brought a stack of Antipodes to one of his lectures. Linda’s radical awakening also came in the UK, in the late 1970s courtesy of her lecturers at Reading University. Sophie Bowlby took her The Emergence of Radical/Critical Geography in North America 306 increasing access to the means of knowledge production to become a peoples’ geography that is grounded in a desire for working towards social change.
    [Show full text]