(Location of Corporate Commonwealth Entities) Order 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Location of Corporate Commonwealth Entities) Order 2016 Public Governance, Performance and Accountability (Location of Corporate Commonwealth Entities) Order 2016 Background: Edward River Council was proclaimed on May 12, 2016 following an amalgamation announced by the NSW Government of the former Deniliquin Council and Conargo Shire Council. It is in the NSW Murray region covering an area totalling 8881 square kilometres with a population of approximately 8,970. The major centre is the town of Deniliquin which is surrounded by productive agricultural land. Withdrawal of Government Services: Deniliquin is a major regional centre in the NSW Murray region and has been the regional headquarters of numerous Federal and State Government Departments and Agencies across a broad range of services. However, during the 1990s there was a significant withdrawal of these services as part of an economic rationalist approach by Governments. The first major impact was relocation away from Deniliquin of the CSIRO Rangelands Research Centre, which was a major employer in the town. This was followed by closure or downsizing of various other Government Departments, the consequences of which were highlighted by then Deniliquin Council General Manager Ian Burfitt in a report to the Grants Commission in August 1999 titled ‘Disability Factors Peculiar To Deniliquin’. Impact of withdrawal of Government Services: Mr Burfitt’s report estimated 165 Government jobs had been withdrawn from Deniliquin in the previous four years at an economic cost of $20 million to $30 million per year. These had come primarily from health services, transport infrastructure services, energy supply, and land and water services. In presenting his report Mr Burfitt said: “The continual decline and withdrawal of services and personnel from Deniliquin has depleted the flow-on effect of higher level positions with the government employment sector.” In the years following Mr Burfitt’s report there was further removal of Government services from Deniliquin which included rationalisation of NSW Agriculture and closure of the Murray Valley Field Station where research work was undertaken. Recent times: In more recent times many Government Departments have developed a greater recognition of the need to have a presence in regional communities. We have seen some stabilisation of health services and an expansion of community and emergency services. However, Edward River Council believes there are numerous services provided by other Government Departments and Agencies which could be more effectively delivered from a local office. These especially, but not exclusively, relate to implementation of water and agriculture policy. For example, it seems incongruous that the office of the Murray-Darling Basin Authority is located in Canberra with no staff presence in the township of Deniliquin which is a focal point of Murray-Darling Basin Plan’s implementation. Edward River Council’s view is that locating Government Departments and Agencies in regional centres provides a win:win – the local community benefits from the increased population and economic activity, and the Government Departments and personnel involved benefit from being given the opportunity to work more closely with the community, thus increasing their ability to provide services that align with community expectations. Council believes it is usually not a case of relocating a head office to a regional centre, but more often establishing a satellite or local office. Impact of Government decisions on our community: There has been a succession of Government decisions, at Federal and State level, which have had an adverse impact on the Deniliquin economy. It started with the aforementioned withdrawal of Government services, which was followed by closure of the region’s timber industry when forests were declared National Parks in 2010, then removal of water from productive use under the Murray-Darling Basin Plan. Successive Governments have failed to acknowledge the flow-on effect to the community from these decisions, nor provide adequate structural adjustment support. A return of Government Departments to Deniliquin would provide a significant economic boost to replace some of the lost employment opportunities. Re- establishing these Government Departments not only provides additional revenue in the community, but also a boost to numerous sporting groups and other local organisations which benefit from an intellectual injection which the personnel often bring with them. What have we done? The Edward River Council community has been proactive in attempts to prosper, despite adverse effects of Government policy and decisions, although this was made particularly difficult during the Millennium Drought when the surrounding agricultural industry, on which the community relies, was severely impacted. In 1999 a meeting was organised by Deniliquin Council and the local Chamber of Commerce to try and establish a new event or festival that would bring people to the town. The result was the inaugural Deniliquin World Record Ute Muster, which has grown into one of Australia’s leading rural festivals attracting more than 20,000 people and generating upwards of $12 million into our community each year. Local Government has actively pursued development opportunities, and as a result we have a significant development at the re-opened Deniliquin Abattoir and we are confident work will start in 2017 on a large ethanol plant. Both were declared Projects of State Significance by the NSW Government. Edward River Council also has a Memorandum of Understanding with Brisbane West Wellcamp Airport to establish a freight hub servicing south-eastern Australia with direct links to Asia. Council is presently working with Governments to obtain funding required for an airport upgrade which this project requires. Edward River Council has a dynamic economic development and tourism department which continually seeks new opportunities and has been successful in building our visitor economy. We are confident Deniliquin has a bright future as a revitalised regional centre, and this can be further enhanced with a stronger presence of Government services and personnel. Conclusion: Edward River Council believes Governments should take all necessary steps to support rural and regional communities, and the relocation of appropriate Government Departments and Agencies from capital cities to regional areas would be a proactive move that would both support these communities and be a sign of faith by Government in the future of rural and regional Australia. In particular, Edward River Council believes Government Departments and Agencies involved in agriculture and water policy should be relocated to towns which are impacted by policies and implementation. Council reiterates the point made previously that in the majority of cases this is likely to involve a regional or satellite office, rather than relocation of a head office. The communication technology at our disposal can support Government Departments and their personnel in regional centres such as Deniliquin. Further, many costs associated with operating an office are less expensive in a centre such as Deniliquin, compared to a capital city. This especially applies to rental office accommodation, but also housing for staff whether this is rental or purchase. Centres such as Deniliquin also offer an outstanding rural lifestyle for families incorporating schools, waterways and sporting facilities. Edward River Council believes relocation of Government Departments and Agencies should not be limited to larger regional centres. It is important that smaller regional centres such as Deniliquin are considered in any relocation discussion. This ensures Government personnel involved in policy and implementation, especially those in agriculture and water policy, are working closely with the communities that are affected by their work and decisions. Edward River Council would welcome a hearing of your Inquiry in Deniliquin where we can provide a first-hand account of the benefits of locating more Government Departments and Agencies in our community. .
Recommended publications
  • Government Gazette of the STATE of NEW SOUTH WALES Number 168 Friday, 30 December 2005 Published Under Authority by Government Advertising and Information
    Government Gazette OF THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES Number 168 Friday, 30 December 2005 Published under authority by Government Advertising and Information Summary of Affairs FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 1989 Section 14 (1) (b) and (3) Part 3 All agencies, subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1989, are required to publish in the Government Gazette, an up-to-date Summary of Affairs. The requirements are specified in section 14 of Part 2 of the Freedom of Information Act. The Summary of Affairs has to contain a list of each of the Agency's policy documents, advice on how the agency's most recent Statement of Affairs may be obtained and contact details for accessing this information. The Summaries have to be published by the end of June and the end of December each year and need to be delivered to Government Advertising and Information two weeks prior to these dates. CONTENTS LOCAL COUNCILS Page Page Page Albury City .................................... 475 Holroyd City Council ..................... 611 Yass Valley Council ....................... 807 Armidale Dumaresq Council ......... 478 Hornsby Shire Council ................... 614 Young Shire Council ...................... 809 Ashfi eld Municipal Council ........... 482 Inverell Shire Council .................... 618 Auburn Council .............................. 484 Junee Shire Council ....................... 620 Ballina Shire Council ..................... 486 Kempsey Shire Council ................. 622 GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS Bankstown City Council ................ 489 Kogarah Council
    [Show full text]
  • Jerilderie Shire Council
    JERILDERIE SHIRE COUNCIL ON-SITE SEWAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN Copyright © Building & Environmental Services Today 2004 The information contained in this document is solely for the use of the client identified on the cover for the purpose for which it has been prepared. No representation is made or is implied as being made to any third party. Building & Environmental Services Today 26 Goulburn Street JUNEE NSW 2663 Ph/Fax: 6924 3986 Mobile: 0428 243 228 Email: [email protected] Web site: www.bestoday.com 2 CONTENTS ON SITE SEWAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN .............................................................................................. 4 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. PURPOSE.................................................................................................................................................... 4 3. OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 PREVENTION OF PUBLIC HEALTH RISK .............................................................................................. 5 3.2 PROTECTION OF SURFACE WATER..................................................................................................... 5 3.3 PROTECTION OF GROUNDWATER ...................................................................................................... 5 3.4 PROTECTION OF LAND .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Snowy River Shire Council Report 2008 Local Government Elections
    Snowy River Shire Council Report 2008 Local Government Elections REPORT ON THE 2008 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS SNOWY RIVER SHIRE COUNCIL General Manager Snowy River Shire Council PO Box 143 Berridale NSW 2628 Dear General Manager I am pleased to present to you a report on the conduct and administration of the 2008 Local Government Elections held for Snowy River Shire Council. Yours sincerely Colin Barry Electoral Commissioner 31 August 2009 REPORT ON THE 2008 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS SNOWY RIVER SHIRE COUNCIL 2 Contents LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF GRAPHS.................................................................................................................... 5 THE 2008 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS ....................................................................... 8 2008 SNOWY RIVER SHIRE COUNCIL ELECTIONS .............................................................. 15 ELECTION PREPARATION.................................................................................................... 19 CONDUCT OF THE ELECTIONS ........................................................................................... 38 ELECTION CONCLUSION.................................................................................................... 67 FUTURE DIRECTION ............................................................................................................. 80 APPENDICES......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette of the STATE of NEW SOUTH WALES Number 187 Friday, 28 December 2007
    Government Gazette OF THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES Number 187 Friday, 28 December 2007 Published under authority by Communications and Advertising Summary of Affairs FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 1989 Section 14 (1) (b) and (3) Part 3 All agencies, subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1989, are required to publish in the Freedom of Information Government Gazette, an up-to-date Summary of Affairs. The requirements are specified in section 14 of Part 2 of the Freedom of Information Act. The Summary of Affairs has to contain a list of each of the Agency's policy documents, advice on how the agency's most recent Statement of Affairs may be obtained and contact details for accessing this information. The Summaries have to be published by the end of June and the end of December each year and need to be delivered to Communications and Advertising two weeks prior to these dates. CONTENTS LOCAL COUNCILS Page Page Page Armidale Dumaresq Council 429 Gosford City Council 567 Richmond Valley Council 726 Ashfield Municipal Council 433 Goulburn Mulwaree Council 575 Riverina Water County Council 728 Auburn Council 435 Greater Hume Shire Council 582 Rockdale City Council 729 Ballina Shire Council 437 Greater Taree City Council 584 Rous County Council 732 Bankstown City Council 441 Great Lakes Council 578 Shellharbour City Council 736 Bathurst Regional Council 444 Gundagai Shire Council 586 Shoalhaven City Council 740 Baulkham Hills Shire Council 446 Gunnedah Shire Council 588 Singleton Council 746 Bega Valley Shire Council 449 Gwydir Shire Council 592
    [Show full text]
  • South Eastern Australia Temperate Woodlands
    Conservation Management Zones of Australia South Eastern Australia Temperate Woodlands Prepared by the Department of the Environment Acknowledgements This project and its associated products are the result of collaboration between the Department of the Environment’s Biodiversity Conservation Division and the Environmental Resources Information Network (ERIN). Invaluable input, advice and support were provided by staff and leading researchers from across the Department of Environment (DotE), Department of Agriculture (DoA), the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the academic community. We would particularly like to thank staff within the Wildlife, Heritage and Marine Division, Parks Australia and the Environment Assessment and Compliance Division of DotE; Nyree Stenekes and Robert Kancans (DoA), Sue McIntyre (CSIRO), Richard Hobbs (University of Western Australia), Michael Hutchinson (ANU); David Lindenmayer and Emma Burns (ANU); and Gilly Llewellyn, Martin Taylor and other staff from the World Wildlife Fund for their generosity and advice. Special thanks to CSIRO researchers Kristen Williams and Simon Ferrier whose modelling of biodiversity patterns underpinned identification of the Conservation Management Zones of Australia. Image Credits Front Cover: Yanga or Murrumbidgee Valley National Park – Paul Childs/OEH Page 4: River Red Gums (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) – Allan Fox Page 10: Regent Honeyeater (Anthochaera phrygia) – Trent Browning Page 16: Gunbower Creek – Arthur Mostead Page 19: Eastern Grey
    [Show full text]
  • Emeritus Mayor Honour Roll
    Emeritus Mayor Honour Roll 2020 Karyl Denise Knight, Greater Hume Shire 2019 Peter Laird, Carrathool Shire Council Peter Woods OAM, Concord Council Stephen Bali FCPA, F Fin, AMIIA, MP, Blacktown City Council 2018 Phillip Wells, Murrumbidgee Council 2017 Doug Eaton, Wyong Shire Council Gary Rush, Bathurst Regional Council Geoff Kettle, Goulburn Mulwaree Council Harold Johnston, Dungog Shire Council Ian Gosper, Cabonne Council Joanna Gash AM, Shoalhaven City Council Paul Joseph Hogan OAM, Greater Taree City Council Peter Abelson, Mosman Council Peter Blackmore OAM, Maitland City Council Peter Shinton, Warrumbungle Shire Council 2016 Andrew Lewis, Bourke Shire Council Angelo Pippos, Brewarrina Shire Council Angelo Tsirekas, City of Canada Bay Barry Johnston OAM, Inverell Shire Council Bill McAnally, Narromine Shire Council Brian Petschler PSM, Kiama Municipal Council Conrad Bolton, Narrabri Shire Council Gordon Bradbery OAM, Wollongong City Council Emeritus Mayor Honour Roll Jenny Clarke, Narrandera Shire Council Laurence J Henery, Jerilderie Shire Council Marianne Saliba, Shellharbour City Council Mark Troy OAM, Bellingen Shire Council Matthew Slack-Smith, Brewarrina Shire Council Michael Neville, Griffith City Council Michelle Byrne (Dr), The Hills Shire Council Ned Mannoun, Liverpool City Council Nigel Judd OAM, Temora Shire Council Norman Rex Firth Wilson OAM, Warren Shire Council Paul Lake, Campbelltown City Council Peter M Yates, Lockhart Shire Council Peter Speirs OAM, Temora Shire Council Richard Quinn, Hunter's Hill Council Ron
    [Show full text]
  • Murray and Wakool 1
    Local Government Boundaries Commission 1. Summary of Local Government Boundaries Commission comments The Boundaries Commission has reviewed the Delegate’s Report on the proposed merger Murray Shire Council and Wakool Shire Council to determine whether it shows the legislative process has been followed and the Delegate has taken into account all the factors required under the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act). The Commission has assessed that: the Delegate’s Report shows that the Delegate has undertaken all the processes required by section 263 of the Act, the Delegate’s Report shows that the Delegate has adequately considered all the factors required by section 263(3) of the Act, with the exception of the factor listed under subsection 263(3)(e5) (diverse communities), and the Delegate’s recommendation in relation to the proposed merger is supported by the Delegate’s assessment of the factors. 2. Summary of the merger proposal On 6 January 2016, the Minister for Local Government referred a proposal to merge the local government areas of Murray Shire Council and Wakool Shire Council to the Acting Chief Executive of the Office of Local Government for examination and report under the Act. The following map shows the proposed new council area (shaded in green). Proposed merger of Murray and Wakool 1 Local Government Boundaries Commission The proposal would have the following impacts on population across the two councils. Council 2016 2031 Murray Shire Council 7,650 8,750 Wakool Shire Council 3,800 3,200 New Council 11,450 11,950 Source: NSW Department of Planning & Environment, 2014 NSW Projections (Population, Household and Dwellings).
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Government Boundary Review
    NSW Government Council Boundary Review Regional NSW Map Inner Sydney Map Outer Sydney Map Registrations and Submissions To register to attend or speak at a public inquiry or to lodge a submission on a proposal, please visit the merger proposal page that interests you and click on the ‘Public Inquiry Registration’ tab to register or the ‘Make a Submission’ tab to make a submission, these tabs are at the top of the proposal page. Please scroll down to find the merger proposal pages. For people who have been unable to register they should contact 1300 813 020 (this service is available 24/7). Background On 6 January 2016 the Minister for Local Government referred 35 merger proposals to the Chief Executive of the Office of Local Government for examination and report under the Local Government Act (the Act). In addition to the Minister’s 35 original council merger proposals, a number of councils have submitted their own proposals. As a consequence, the Minister has put forward a number of additional proposals for adjacent areas for examination and reporting, in the event that the council-initiated proposals proceed. The additional proposals will undergo the same process of examination and reporting, which includes Delegates conducting public inquiries, calling for written submissions, and preparing reports with due regard to the factors in section 263(3) of the Act. The public inquiries for the Minister’s 35 original council merger proposals have now been completed and written submissions have closed. Please visit the links below to find the details of the public inquiries and closing dates for written submissions for the additional merger proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • IPART Report Card
    REPORT CARD IPART assessment of NSW council Fit for the Future proposals The Independent Pricing and Regulatory IPART assessed the proposals against Tribunal (IPART) has recently provided the the following criteria: NSW Government with its report on the • Scale and capacity assessment of 139 Fit for the Future council • Financial criteria proposals (received from 144 councils). - Financial sustainability This report card provides a snapshot of - Infrastructure and service what IPART found. management - Efficiency The IPART report clearly shows that the system of local government in NSW is broken. 60%Not fit 40%Fit “Our (IPART’s) analysis and Sydney metro merges could save close to the analysis undertaken by our independent economic consultants, Ernst & Young, indicated the merger option would provide large net benefits to the local communities.” $2billion *IPART 20-year NPV estimate usung standardised assumptions Assessment of Council Fit for the Future Proposals - p2 based on council consultant business cases - p40 Sydney metropolitan councils: Regional councils: 71% Not fit 56%Not fit This report card was produced by the Office of Local Government. The full IPART report can be found atwww.ipart.nsw.gov.au REPORT CARD - Key Findings Merger benefits - up to Councils prefered rate $2 billion rises to merging IPART conducted additional analysis on Many councils proposed rate increases to business cases submitted by councils and improve financial performance. Some 32 estimate between $1.8 billion to $2.0 billion in councils proposed a rate rise to get fit with 15 NPV benefits could be realised over 20 years councils proposing rises above 30%. if mergers were to occur in Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • Election by Postal Ballot
    The NSW Greyhound Breeders, Owners & Trainers’ Association Registered Office: Suite 3, Level 2 Wentworth Park Sporting Complex, Wentworth Park Road, Glebe 2037 All Correspondence to: PO BOX 485, Glebe 2037 Telephone: (02) 9649 7166 Email: [email protected] ACN 000 043 756 ABN 68 000 043 756 ELECTION BY POSTAL BALLOT Applications are invited from Full Members of the Association to stand for election as a Director in all Districts as below. Applications must be signed by the nominee and proposed and seconded by two other Full Members of the Association. Directors must provide their services in an honorary capacity. Nominations close on MARCH 31, 2020 AT 12 NOON and must be with the Returning Officer by this time. RETURNING OFFICER DETAILS: Mr. P Zielinski Mail: PO Box 950 Glebe NSW 2037 Email: [email protected] By hand: NSW GBOTA Head Office: Suite 3, 2nd Floor Wentworth Park Sporting Complex, Glebe 2037 Attention is drawn to Clause 18.11.2 of the Constitution which states: 18.11.2. A person shall not be eligible for election as a Director unless; 18.11.2.1. he or she is a Financial and Eligible Member; 18.11.2.2. has been a Full Member for not less than two years as of 30 March in an election year; 18.11.2.3. has consented in writing to act as a Director; 18.11.2.4. has been nominated in writing for the position by two (2) Full Members; and 18.11.2.5. has not within the ten years preceding the election been sentenced to term of imprisonment (whether suspended or not) in Australia or elsewhere for a period exceeding three months METROPOLITAN
    [Show full text]
  • Murray Group of Concerned Communities
    Murray Group of Concerned Communities – Submission to the Senate Standing Committee on Rural Affairs and Transport Inquiry in the Management of the Murray Darling Basin Contact Bruce Simpson Chair – Murray Group of Concerned Communities The MGCC represents the Central Murray region of 31,300 people who are passionate about living and working in these regional and rural communities. The Central Murray communities have already given 17 per cent of water entitlements to the environment. Supported by: Berrigan & District Development Association, Berrigan Shire Council, Berriquin Landholders Association, Bullatale Creek Trust, Conargo Shire Council, Deniboota Landholders Association, Deniliquin Shire Council, Deniliquin Pastoral Times, Denimein Landholders Association, Jerilderie Shire Council, Moira Private Irrigation Scheme, Murray Catchment Management Authority, Murray Irrigation Limited, Murray Shire Council, Murray Valley Community Action Group, Murray Valley Private Diverters, Murrumbidgee Private Irrigators, Peppin Planners, RAMROC, Ricegrowers’ Association of Australia, Southern Riverina Irrigators, Sunrice, Wakool Action Group, Wakool Rivers Association, Wakool Landholders Association, Wakool Shire Council, West Berriquin Landholders Association, West Corurgan Private Irrigation Introduction The Murray Group of Concerned Communities encompasses the communities within the Deniliquin, Conargo, Jerilderie, Wakool, Murray and Berrigan shires, and endeavours to represent these communities encompassed by its 28 supporting groups. Request to Address the Committee The MGCC requests the opportunity to address the Committee to support the evidence provided in this Submission. Overview “While the Authority has an important part to play, it is neither empowered nor equipped to undertake the entire complex task.” Mike Taylor, Chair MDBA “This was clearly an impossible task given to the Authority, because they were somehow supposed to just use science but also somehow relieve political leaders of their responsibilities to make this choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Council Amalgamations Proceeding
    Barton Deakin Brief: New South Wales Government’s Local Government Amalgamations 13 May 2016 On 12 May 2016, the Premier of New South Wales, the Hon Mike Baird MP announced the amalgamation of 19 new councils across Sydney and New South Wales. Another 9 amalgamations await the outcome of litigation. Finally, 14 of the original proposed amalgamations will not proceed. This Barton Deakin Brief outlines the New South Wales Government’s announcement of Local Government Amalgamation Proceedings. Background On 6 January 2016, the Minister for Local Government, the Hon Paul Toole MP, announced 35 merger proposals to the Chief Executive of the Office of Local Government for examination and report under the Local Government Act 1993. In addition to a number of councils submitting their own proposals, the Chief Executive delegated the examination and reporting function for a total of 45 merger proposals to Delegates. Delegates conducted public inquiries, called for written submission and prepared reports with regard to section 263(3) of the Local Government Act 1993. Delegate reports were then sent to the Minister for Local Government, the Hon Paul Toole MP and the independent Local Government Boundaries Commission for comment. Council Amalgamations Proceeding 1. Armidale Regional Council : The merger of Armidale Dumaresq and Guyra Shire councils 2. Canterbury-Bankstown Council : The merger of Bankstown City and Canterbury City councils 3. Central Coast Council : The merger of Gosford City and Wyong Shire councils 4. City of Parramatta Council : The merger of Paramatta City*, The Hills Shire*, Auburn City*, Holroyd City* and Hornsby Shire* councils 5. Cumberland Council : The merger of Parramatta City*, Auburn City* and Holroyd City* councils 6.
    [Show full text]