DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report Laos 06 SO VL Signed 26-03-2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report Laos 06 SO VL Signed 26-03-2018 Final Report in scale Rural - 4710 : UNDP PIMS ID / 00084024 sia Pacific / A Laos PDR Effectivefor Governance Small / UNDP Project ID: , country/region:, 554 provinces of Sekong and Saravane climate change climate al area: c Terminal Evaluation “ Infrastructure and Disaster Preparedness in a Changing Climate Lao PDR GEF Project ID: 4 Fo sites: Project Evaluation timeframe: Acknowledgments: 01/10/2017 – 05/11/2017 The evaluation team wishes to thank the project team for their detailed Prepared by: assessment of the project situation, Mrs. Margaret Jones Williams from UNDP Environmental Unit as well as Mr. Vanxay Boutanavong for facilitating Mr Vincent Lefebvre the mission in the provinces. We are also grateful to Mr. Chanhao Mr Singha Ounniyom Xaiyathong and Mr. Sangviane Thidalak, respectively focal points of Sekong Date: 26/03/2018 and Saravane provinces for accompanying the team and facilitating the on- site contacts with district authorities and communities. Final report Terminal Evaluation “Effective Governance for Small-scale Rural Infrastructure and Disaster Preparedness in a Changing Climate in Lao PDR” 26/03/2018 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... III PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE..................................................................................................................................................... III PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................................................................... III TERMINAL EVALUATION PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................. IV EVALUATION FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................................................ IV EVALUATION RATING TABLE ................................................................................................................................................. VIII SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED................................................................................... VIII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................................ XI 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................14 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE EVALUATION ......................................................................................................................... 15 1.2 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................. 16 1.2.1 Scope ........................................................................................................................................................... 16 1.2.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................... 16 1.2.3 Limitations .................................................................................................................................................. 17 1.3 STRUCTURE OF THE EVALUATION REPORT ....................................................................................................... 17 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT .................................................................18 2.1 PROJECT START AND DURATION ....................................................................................................................... 18 2.2 PROBLEMS THAT THE PROJECT SOUGHT TO ADDRESS ....................................................................................... 18 2.3 IMMEDIATE AND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT ......................................................................... 19 2.4 BASELINE INDICATORS ESTABLISHED ............................................................................................................... 19 2.5 MAIN STAKEHOLDERS ...................................................................................................................................... 20 3. FINDINGS .......................................................................................................................................................22 3.1 PROJECT DESIGN / FORMULATION .................................................................................................................... 22 3.1.1 Analysis of logical framework / Results Framework .................................................................................. 22 3.1.2 Assumptions and risks ................................................................................................................................. 24 3.1.3 Lessons learned from other projects incorporated into project design ...................................................... 25 3.1.4 Planned stakeholders’ participation ........................................................................................................... 26 3.1.5 Replication approach .................................................................................................................................. 27 3.1.6 UNDP comparative advantage ................................................................................................................... 27 3.1.7 Linkages between project and interventions within the sector .................................................................... 28 3.1.8 Management arrangements ........................................................................................................................ 29 3.2 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION.............................................................................................................................. 30 3.2.1 Adaptive management ................................................................................................................................. 30 3.2.2 Partnership arrangements .......................................................................................................................... 31 3.2.3 Feedback from M&E used for adaptive management ................................................................................. 31 3.2.4 Project finance ............................................................................................................................................ 32 3.2.5 Monitoring and evaluation: design at entry and implementation ............................................................... 33 3.2.6 UNDP and Implementing Partner implementation / execution coordination and operational issues ........ 35 3.3 PROJECT RESULTS ............................................................................................................................................ 36 3.3.1 Overall results............................................................................................................................................. 36 3.3.2 Relevance .................................................................................................................................................... 40 3.3.3 Effectiveness and efficiency ........................................................................................................................ 41 3.3.4 Country ownership ...................................................................................................................................... 43 3.3.5 Mainstreaming ............................................................................................................................................ 43 3.3.6 Elements of Sustainability ........................................................................................................................... 44 3.3.7 Potential impact .......................................................................................................................................... 47 i Final report Terminal Evaluation “Effective Governance for Small-scale Rural Infrastructure and Disaster Preparedness in a Changing Climate in Lao PDR” 26/03/2018 4. CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED .....................................................50 4.1 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 50 4.1.1 Major achievements and strengths ............................................................................................................. 51 4.1.2 Key shortcomings and weaknesses ............................................................................................................. 51 4.2 RECOMMENDATIONS AND LESSONS TO BE LEARNED ........................................................................................ 52 4.2.1 Lessons learned for the design, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of the project ...................... 52 4.2.2 Actions to follow-up or reinforce initial benefits from the project .............................................................. 54 4.2.3 Proposals for future directions underlining main objectives ...................................................................... 58 5. LIST
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ho Chi Minh Trail SecOns: the Ho Chi Minh Trail Was the Route from North Vietnam to South
    JULY 2019 SUPPLEMENT VOL 82.5 Chapter 16 Newsleer Organizaon and Responsibilies: Editor: Glen Craig The Ho Chi Minh Trail Secons: The Ho Chi Minh Trail was the route from North Vietnam to South Message from the President: Stephen Durfee Vietnam thru Laos and Cambodia that North Vietnam used to Treasurers Report: Willi Lindner supply the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army in South Vietnam with Weapons, Ammuni on and other supplies. Sec. Rpt (Staff Meeng Minutes): Mike Barkstrom Sick Call/Obituary: Chaplain Butch Hall Blast from the Past: Glen Craig Special Recognion: Mike Barkstrom Upcoming Events: Mike Barkstrom Calendar: Stephen Durfee Human Interest Story: Chapter at large SFA Naonal HQ Update: Stephen Durfee Aer Acon Report: Jim Lessler Membership Info: Roy Sayer Adversements: Glen Craig Suspense: Newsleer published (Web): 1st of each odd numbered month Input due to editor: 20th of each even numbered month Dra due to President: 27th of each even numbered month Final Dra due 29th of each even numbered month I thought this was interesng and wanted to share it with everyone. I hope you enjoy it. Legend of the Ho Chi Minh Trail Ho Chi Minh Trail Aug14, 2012 Please ask, about our Ho Chi Minh Trail tours! Page 1 Ho Chi Minh trail, painng by Veteran Larry Chambers The Legend of the Ho Chi Minh trail, there are few brand names to match that of the Ho Chi Minh Trail, the secret, shiing, network of deep jungle tracks that led to the Victory for Vietnam war. SA 2 Surface to Air missile, Ho Chi Minh trail Southern Laos, Ho Chi Minh trail Huey helicopter used in the Lamson bale at the Ban Dong war museum Well here I sit in Laos again, I have been pung around the place on and off for 10 years now.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Accessibility Analysis for Emergency Obstetric Care Services in Lao People's Democratic Republic
    Investing the Marginal Dollar for Maternal and Newborn Health: Geographic Accessibility Analysis for Emergency Obstetric Care services in Lao People's Democratic Republic Steeve Ebener, PhD 1 and Karin Stenberg, MSc 2 1 Consultant, Gaia GeoSystems, The Philippines 2 Technical Officer, Department of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland Geographic Accessibility Analysis for Emergency Obstetric Care services in Lao PDR © World Health Organization 2016 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO website (http://www.who.int ) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected] ). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications –whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution– should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO website (http://www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/index.html ). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted and dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Communal Land Titling in Practice: Lessons from Khammouane Province, Lao PDR
    Towards equitable and secure access to land and natural resources for family farmers in the Mekong region Capitalization Note June 2017 Communal land titling in practice: Lessons from Khammouane Province, Lao PDR Mr Bounthavy, shown here on the communal land, is the leader of the Talak communal land management committee CIDSE-Laos Mekong Region Land Governance Capitalization Note Written by Stuart Ling and Natalia Scurrah Reviewed by: Christian Castellanet, Mekong Region Land Governance Khankham Douangsila, CIDSE-Laos Country Representative For more information, contact Stuart Ling, Independent Consultant: <[email protected]> Khankham Douangsila, CIDSE-Laos Country Representative: <[email protected]> Natalia Scurrah, MRLG: <[email protected]> Suggested citation: Ling, S. and Scurrah, N. (2017). Communal land titling in practice: Lessons from Khammouane Province, Lao PDR. MRLG Capitalization Note Series #3. Vientiane: Mekong Region Land Governance. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Photo cover credit: Stuart Ling Table of contents Table of contents Executive Summary ii List of acronyms iv 1. Background 1 2. Process description 5 3. Main results 10 4. Lessons learned 14 5. Conditions for replication 18 5.1. Scaling up the innovation successfully 18 5.2. Limits to scaling up 20 6. Conclusion 25 References and suggested readings 27 Annexes 30 Annex 1. Final PLUP Map of Talaknathin village 30 Annex 2. Timeline of the CLT process in Talaknathin village 31 Annex 3. Communal Land Use Regulations, Talaknathin village 32 List of Figures Figure 1. Location map of Talaknathin village 4 Figure 2. The PONRE team with their measuring instruments showing the karsts surrounding the communal land 8 Figure 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Participatory Biodiversity Assessment
    A Rapid Participatory Biodiversity Assessment Stora Enso Eucalypt Plantation in Southern Lao PDR Conducted by IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) in Lao PDR May 19, 2008 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. Authored by: IUCN Lao PDR Copyright: © 2007 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Resources: Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Lao PDR Country Office: 082/01 Fa Ngum Road Ban watt Chan P.O. Box 4340 Vientiane, Lao PDR www. iucn.org Tel: +856 -21 216401 Fax: +856 -21216127 2 Contents Executive Summary................................................................................................... i Recommendations................................................................................................... iii 5.1 Recommendations to strengthen the
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Paper for the 10Th EU-Laos Human Rights Dialogue
    FIDH – International Federation for Human Rights and its member organization Lao Movement for Human Rights (LMHR) Briefing paper for the 10th EU-Laos Human Rights Dialogue 14 June 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 .… Political prisoners remain behind bars 2 .… Failure to cooperate with UN human rights mechanisms 3 .… Third UPR marks a step backward 3 .… Legislative elections fail to meet international standards 5 .… Freedom of expression stifled 6 .… Serious violations of religious freedoms persist 7 .… Negative impact of infrastructure and investment projects 11 .. COVID-19 affects infrastructure projects and their impact 12 .. Dam collapse survivors neglected There has been no improvement in the human rights situation in Laos in 2020-2021. Serious violations of civil and political rights, as well as social, economic, and cultural rights, have continued to occur and have remained unaddressed. This briefing paper provides a summary of key human rights developments during this period. Political prisoners remain behind bars Several individuals who have been imprisoned for the exercise of their right to freedom of opinion and expression remain behind bars. They include: • Ms. Houayheuang Xayabouly, aka Mouay, 32, who has been detained since 12 September 2019, is serving a five-year prison sentence on spurious charges under Article 117 of the Criminal Code (“Propaganda against the Lao People’s Democratic Republic”). Mouay is currently detained in Champasak provincial prison. • Mr. Somphone Phimmasone, 34, Mr. Soukan Chaithad, 37, and Ms. Lodkham Thammavong, approximately 35, who have been detained since March 2016, are serving prison sentences of 20, 16, and 12 years, respectively, on trumped-up charges under Articles 56, 65, and 72 of the Criminal Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Gibbon Status Review for Lao PDR 2008
    Preliminary Gibbon Status Review for Lao PDR 2008 J.W. Duckworth December 2008 This work was carried out with funding from the Arcus Foundation. Preliminary gibbon status review for Lao PDR 2008 This review is a work in progress for the conservation of gibbons in Lao PDR. It is intended to be updated periodically. Any comment on this document, including further records, would be gratefully received by the author and by Fauna & Flora International, at the addresses below. Citation: J. W. Duckworth, 2008, Preliminary gibbon status review for Lao PDR 2008, Fauna & Flora International, Unpublished report. Author: J. W. Duckworth, PO Box 5773, Vientiane, Lao PDR Email: [email protected] Date: December 2008 For more information or to send further comments contact: Paul Insua-Cao Fauna & Flora Asia-Pacific Programme, 340 Nghi Tam, Hanoi, Vietnam Tel: +84-(0)43-719 4117 Fax: +84-(0)43-719 4119 Email: [email protected] Front cover photo of a captive young yellow-cheeked crested gibbon by Monty Sly. All views expressed within are the author’s alone unless attributed otherwise and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Fauna & Flora International. While the authors and editors strive for rigour and accuracy in presenting this report, Fauna & Flora International make no representations as to completeness, suitability or validity of any information contained, and will not be liable for any errors or omissions. The editors and Fauna & Flora International take no responsibility for any misrepresentation of material resulting from translation of this report into any other language. Reproduction of any part of this report for educational, conservation and other non-profit purposes is authorised without prior permission from the copyright holder, provided that the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • UXO/Mine Action in Lao PDR
    2014 ANNUAL REPORT This document acts as Annual Report of the National Regulatory Authority for UXO/Mine Action in Lao PDR. For further information, please contact the: National Regulatory Authority for UXO/Mine Action Sector in Lao PDR (NRA) Sisangvone Village, P.O. Box 7621, Unit 19, Saysettha District, Vientiane, Lao PDR Website: www.nra.gov.la Telephone: (856-21) 262386 Donation for UXO victims: your support can make a difference. Your contribution to the National Regulatory Authority for UXO/Mine Action in Lao PDR can support for families and children whose lives have been suffered by the UXO from the Indo-China War. For how to give, please contact Victim Assistance Unit of the National Regulatory Authority for UXO/Mine Action in Lao PDR, Mr. Bountao Chanthavongsa via email: [email protected] Compiled and designed by: Vilavong SYSAVATH and Olivier BAUDUIN Photos: Photos that appear in the Operator Reports, unless individually credited, were taken by and are the property of that Operator. All other photos in this report, unless individually creditied, have been taken by the following people - Vilavong SYSAVATH Acknowledgements: The NRA would like to thank all UXO/Mine Action Sector Operators who provided images and information on their projects and activities in 2014 for this report. The NRA Programme and Public Relations Unit would also like to acknowledge the support and effort put in by all Members of the NRA team in helping to compile the UXO Sector Annual Report 2014. This report may be subject to change after publication. To find out more about changes, errors, or omissions please visit the website: www.nra.gov.la.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Land Management Demonstration Sites
    Sustainable Land Management Demonstration Sites Established under the IFAD Grant ‘Scaling up Sustainable Land Management practices by smallholder farmers: working with agricultural extension services to identify, assess and disseminate SLM practices’. November 2020 For further information please contact: Bounthanom BOUAHOM [email protected], National Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development Research Institute (NAFRI) Nongviengkham village, Saythany district, Vientiane Lao PDR (+856) 021 770047 CDE CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT Sustainable Land Management Demonstration site 1: the compost (cow dung and sh feces) as well as the decaying Utilization of Water from a Fishpond to Irrigated Paddy Rice rice straws and other organic matters deposited at the bottom of the pond, as these provide the necessary nutrients for the rice to grow. Moreover, the movement of sh stimulates the changing of the water’s colour cause by sh movement. It also possible to improve the water quality by mixing in some of the animal dung, before the water is allowed to drain into the rice paddies. The water supply is retained in the shpond by rstly sourcing the water from the upstream location with the use of PVC pipes, and this avoids a direct ow into rice paddies. The farmers maintain the water at the required level and then allow a free discharge of overow into the rice paddies. If one compares the old practice of transferring water directly from the stream into rice paddies, the water owed slowly and it took a longer time to reach the sucient water level in the rice termites, insects and natural grasses was a challenge faced paddies.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Economic Corridors Between Vietnam and Lao PDR: Roles Played by Vietnam
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Potential economic corridors between Vietnam and Lao PDR: Roles played by Vietnam Nguyen, Binh Giang IDE-JETRO 2012 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/40502/ MPRA Paper No. 40502, posted 06 Aug 2012 12:14 UTC CHAPTER 3 Potential Economic Corridors between Vietnam and Lao PDR: Roles Played by Vietnam Nguyen Binh Giang This chapter should be cited as: NGUYEN, Bing Giang 2012. “Potential Economic Corridors between Vietnam and Lao PDR: Roles Played by Vietnam” in Emerging Economic Corridors in The Mekong Region, edited by Masami Ishida, BRC Research Report No.8, Bangkok Research Center, IDE-JETRO, Bangkok, Thailand. CHAPTER 3 POTENTIAL ECONOMIC CORRIDORS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND LAO PDR: ROLES PLAYED BY VIETNAM Nguyen Binh Giang INTRODUCTION The Third Thai-Lao Friendship Bridge over the Mekong River officially opened on November 11, 2011, facilitating cross-border trade along Asian Highway (AH) 15 (Route No. 8) and AH 131 (Route No. 12) between northeast Thailand, central Lao PDR and North Central Vietnam. Since the establishment of the East-West Economic Corridor (EWEC) which is based on AH 16 (Route No. 9), the cross-border trade among countries in the Greater Mekong Sub-region has been much facilitated. The success of EWEC encourages local governments in the region to establish other economic corridors. Currently, it seems that there are ambitions to establish parallel corridors with EWEC. The basic criteria for these corridors is the connectivity of the Thailand-Lao PDR or Lao PDR-Vietnam border gates, major cities in northeast Thailand, south and central Lao PDR, and North Central and Middle Central Vietnam, and ports in Vietnam by utilizing some existing Asian Highways (AHs) or national highways.
    [Show full text]
  • CARE Lao PDR Women Organized for Rural Development
    CARE Lao PDR Women Organized for Rural Development Australian NGO Cooperation Program Endline Evaluation Report May-June 2017 Dr. Antonella Diana 1 Table of Contents Abbreviations 1 Executive Summary 4 Acknowledgments 10 Introduction 11 Scope and Context of the Project 11 Methodology 15 Findings and Analysis 18 Objective 1: To promote remote ethnic women’s collective actions through income-generating activities 18 Objective 2: To strengthen CBOs and NPAs to enable them to support and represent remote ethnic women 45 Objective 3: To enhance linkages between learning, programming and policy influencing 59 Lessons learned 61 Recommendations 65 List of references 69 Annexes 70 2 Abbreviations ANCP Australian NGO Cooperation Program CBOs community based organizations CPG Coffee Production/Processing Groups DAFO District Agriculture and Forestry Office DHO District Health Office FC Farming Cooperative FG Farmer Groups FGD focus group discussions FPG Farmers’ Production Groups GoL Government of Laos GBV Gender Based Violence IGA Income Generating Activities LDPA Lao Disabled People Association (Sekong) LTP long-term program LWU Lao Women Union NPAs Non Profit Associations PAFO Provincial Agriculture and Forestry Office POFA Provincial Foreign Affairs Office PPCA Partner’s Participatory Capacity Assessment PWED Partnership for Poverty Reduction and Women’s Empowerment REW Remote Ethnic Women SAEDA Sustainable Agriculture and Environment Development Association (Phongsaly) VSLA Village Savings and Loan Associations WINGs Women Interests and Nutrition Groups 3 Executive Summary The 3-year (2014 – 2017) Women Organised for Rural development (WORD) project aimed to ensure benefits to remote ethnic women (REW) and their communities through strengthening community-led farmers and women’s groups (community based organisations - CBOs) in order to strengthen REW livelihoods and foster demand driven service delivery that would sustain beyond the project duration.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Education (Girls) Project
    Completion Report Project Number: 29288 Loan Number: 1621 July 2008 Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Basic Education (Girls) Project CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit – kip (KN) At Appraisal At Project Completion 30 April 1998 31 July 2007 KN1.00 = $0.000419 $0.000104 $1.00 = KN2,383.50 KN9,550 ABBREVIATIONS CCED – committee for community education and development DEB – district education bureau DNFE – Department of Non-Formal Education EA – executing agency EMIS – education management information system EQIP – Education Quality Improvement Project GDP – gross domestic product GEMEU – Gender and Ethnic Minorities Education Unit Lao PDR – Lao People’s Democratic Republic MOE – Ministry of Education NGO – nongovernment organization NRIES – National Research Institute for Educational Science PES – provincial education service PWG – project working group RRP – report and recommendation of the President TA – technical assistance TTC – teacher training center NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government ends on 30 September. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2008 ends on 30 September 2008. (ii) In this report, “$” refers to US dollars Vice President C. Lawrence Greenwood, Jr. Operations 2 Director General A. Thapan, Southeast Asia Department (SERD) Director G.H. Kim, Lao Resident Mission (LRM), SERD Team leader K. Chanthy, Senior Project Implementation Officer, LRM, SERD Team member S. Souannavong, Assistant Project Analyst, LRM, SERD iii CONTENTS Page BASIC DATA i I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 II. EVALUATION OF DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION 2 A. Relevance of Design and Formulation 2 B. Project Outputs 4 C. Project Costs 7 D. Disbursements 7 E. Project Schedule 7 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance, Public Administration Reform & Decentralized Service
    Governance, Public Administration Reform & Decentralized Service Delivery Project (GPAR) Saravane Province Lao Peoples Democratic Republic Final Report of the Mid Term Review Submitted to the United Nations Capital Development Fund 1st April 2009 1 ACRONYMS AND LAOTIAN TERMS .................................................................. 5 DISCLAIMER ....................................................................................................... 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 8 1. Aim of Mid Term Review .................................................................................. 8 2. Project profile ................................................................................................... 8 3. Project hypothesis ............................................................................................ 9 4. Project logical framework ................................................................................. 9 5. Intervention strategy ......................................................................................... 9 6. Fiscal status and performance ......................................................................... 9 7. Principal findings ............................................................................................ 10 7.1 Achievements ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]