Governance, Public Administration Reform & Decentralized Service

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Governance, Public Administration Reform & Decentralized Service Governance, Public Administration Reform & Decentralized Service Delivery Project (GPAR) Saravane Province Lao Peoples Democratic Republic Final Report of the Mid Term Review Submitted to the United Nations Capital Development Fund 1st April 2009 1 ACRONYMS AND LAOTIAN TERMS .................................................................. 5 DISCLAIMER ....................................................................................................... 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 8 1. Aim of Mid Term Review .................................................................................. 8 2. Project profile ................................................................................................... 8 3. Project hypothesis ............................................................................................ 9 4. Project logical framework ................................................................................. 9 5. Intervention strategy ......................................................................................... 9 6. Fiscal status and performance ......................................................................... 9 7. Principal findings ............................................................................................ 10 7.1 Achievements ........................................................................................... 10 7.2 Challenges ................................................................................................ 11 8. Recommendations ......................................................................................... 12 8.1 For Saravane province and districts ......................................................... 12 8.2 For the national level ................................................................................ 12 A. PROJECT SUMMARY ................................................................................... 14 B. PURPOSE OF EVALUATION ....................................................................... 15 1. Purpose of the mid term review .................................................................. 15 2. Project cycle ............................................................................................... 15 C. METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 16 1. Methodology and tools ............................................................................... 16 2. People with whom the team interacted ...................................................... 17 3. Team composition ...................................................................................... 17 4. Workplan ..................................................................................................... 18 D. PROJECT PROFILE...................................................................................... 19 1. Project background ..................................................................................... 19 2. Country context and status of decentralisation .......................................... 19 3. Project management arrangements ........................................................... 20 4. Project logical framework ........................................................................... 21 5. Intervention strategy ................................................................................... 23 6. Fiscal status and performance ................................................................... 24 E. EVALUATION ................................................................................................ 27 1. PROJECT DESIGN ........................................................................................ 27 2. FINANCING AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ............................................ 30 2.1 Objectives ................................................................................................. 30 2.2 Achievements ........................................................................................... 30 2.3 Challenges ................................................................................................ 33 2.4 Critical factors affecting results achievement ........................................... 33 2.5 Sustainability of results ............................................................................. 34 2.6 Lessons .................................................................................................... 34 2.7 Recommendations .................................................................................... 35 3. PLANNING AND BUDGETING ...................................................................... 36 3.1 Objectives ................................................................................................. 36 3.2 Achievements ........................................................................................... 36 3.4 Challenges ................................................................................................ 37 3.5 Critical factors affecting results achievement ........................................... 39 2 3.6 Sustainability of results ............................................................................. 39 3.7 Lessons .................................................................................................... 40 3.8 Recommendations .................................................................................... 40 4. ADMINISTRATIVE RE-ORGANISATION ...................................................... 42 4.1 Objectives ................................................................................................. 42 4.2 Achievements ........................................................................................... 42 4.3 Challenges ................................................................................................ 43 4.4 Critical factors ........................................................................................... 43 4.5 Sustainability ............................................................................................. 44 4.6 Lessons .................................................................................................... 44 4.7 Recommendations .................................................................................... 45 5. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT .......................................................... 46 5.1 Objectives ................................................................................................. 46 5.2 Results achievement & remaining challenges ......................................... 46 5.3 Critical factors affecting results achievement ........................................... 49 5.4 Sustainability of results ............................................................................. 49 5.5 Lessons .................................................................................................... 50 5.6 Recommendations .................................................................................... 50 6. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES ............................................................. 51 6.1 Objectives ................................................................................................. 51 6.2 Results achievement & remaining challenges ......................................... 51 6.3 Critical factors affecting results achievement ........................................... 57 6.4 Sustainability of results ............................................................................. 57 6.5 Lessons .................................................................................................... 57 6.6 Recommendations .................................................................................... 58 7. NATIONAL POLICY REFORM AND REPLICATION .................................... 59 7.1 Objectives ................................................................................................. 59 7.2 Achievements ........................................................................................... 60 7.3 Challenges ................................................................................................ 62 7.4 Lessons .................................................................................................... 64 7.5 Recommendations .................................................................................... 64 9. MONITORING AND EVALUATION ............................................................... 65 9.1 Objectives ................................................................................................. 65 9.2 Results achievement and remaining challenges ...................................... 65 9.3 Critical factors affecting results achievement ........................................... 67 9.4 Sustainability of results ............................................................................. 68 9.5 Lessons .................................................................................................... 68 9.6 Recommendations .................................................................................... 68 10. OVERALL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................... 69 10.1 Overall findings and recommendations .................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Ho Chi Minh Trail SecOns: the Ho Chi Minh Trail Was the Route from North Vietnam to South
    JULY 2019 SUPPLEMENT VOL 82.5 Chapter 16 Newsleer Organizaon and Responsibilies: Editor: Glen Craig The Ho Chi Minh Trail Secons: The Ho Chi Minh Trail was the route from North Vietnam to South Message from the President: Stephen Durfee Vietnam thru Laos and Cambodia that North Vietnam used to Treasurers Report: Willi Lindner supply the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army in South Vietnam with Weapons, Ammuni on and other supplies. Sec. Rpt (Staff Meeng Minutes): Mike Barkstrom Sick Call/Obituary: Chaplain Butch Hall Blast from the Past: Glen Craig Special Recognion: Mike Barkstrom Upcoming Events: Mike Barkstrom Calendar: Stephen Durfee Human Interest Story: Chapter at large SFA Naonal HQ Update: Stephen Durfee Aer Acon Report: Jim Lessler Membership Info: Roy Sayer Adversements: Glen Craig Suspense: Newsleer published (Web): 1st of each odd numbered month Input due to editor: 20th of each even numbered month Dra due to President: 27th of each even numbered month Final Dra due 29th of each even numbered month I thought this was interesng and wanted to share it with everyone. I hope you enjoy it. Legend of the Ho Chi Minh Trail Ho Chi Minh Trail Aug14, 2012 Please ask, about our Ho Chi Minh Trail tours! Page 1 Ho Chi Minh trail, painng by Veteran Larry Chambers The Legend of the Ho Chi Minh trail, there are few brand names to match that of the Ho Chi Minh Trail, the secret, shiing, network of deep jungle tracks that led to the Victory for Vietnam war. SA 2 Surface to Air missile, Ho Chi Minh trail Southern Laos, Ho Chi Minh trail Huey helicopter used in the Lamson bale at the Ban Dong war museum Well here I sit in Laos again, I have been pung around the place on and off for 10 years now.
    [Show full text]
  • Communal Land Titling in Practice: Lessons from Khammouane Province, Lao PDR
    Towards equitable and secure access to land and natural resources for family farmers in the Mekong region Capitalization Note June 2017 Communal land titling in practice: Lessons from Khammouane Province, Lao PDR Mr Bounthavy, shown here on the communal land, is the leader of the Talak communal land management committee CIDSE-Laos Mekong Region Land Governance Capitalization Note Written by Stuart Ling and Natalia Scurrah Reviewed by: Christian Castellanet, Mekong Region Land Governance Khankham Douangsila, CIDSE-Laos Country Representative For more information, contact Stuart Ling, Independent Consultant: <[email protected]> Khankham Douangsila, CIDSE-Laos Country Representative: <[email protected]> Natalia Scurrah, MRLG: <[email protected]> Suggested citation: Ling, S. and Scurrah, N. (2017). Communal land titling in practice: Lessons from Khammouane Province, Lao PDR. MRLG Capitalization Note Series #3. Vientiane: Mekong Region Land Governance. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Photo cover credit: Stuart Ling Table of contents Table of contents Executive Summary ii List of acronyms iv 1. Background 1 2. Process description 5 3. Main results 10 4. Lessons learned 14 5. Conditions for replication 18 5.1. Scaling up the innovation successfully 18 5.2. Limits to scaling up 20 6. Conclusion 25 References and suggested readings 27 Annexes 30 Annex 1. Final PLUP Map of Talaknathin village 30 Annex 2. Timeline of the CLT process in Talaknathin village 31 Annex 3. Communal Land Use Regulations, Talaknathin village 32 List of Figures Figure 1. Location map of Talaknathin village 4 Figure 2. The PONRE team with their measuring instruments showing the karsts surrounding the communal land 8 Figure 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Participatory Biodiversity Assessment
    A Rapid Participatory Biodiversity Assessment Stora Enso Eucalypt Plantation in Southern Lao PDR Conducted by IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) in Lao PDR May 19, 2008 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. Authored by: IUCN Lao PDR Copyright: © 2007 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Resources: Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Lao PDR Country Office: 082/01 Fa Ngum Road Ban watt Chan P.O. Box 4340 Vientiane, Lao PDR www. iucn.org Tel: +856 -21 216401 Fax: +856 -21216127 2 Contents Executive Summary................................................................................................... i Recommendations................................................................................................... iii 5.1 Recommendations to strengthen the
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Paper for the 10Th EU-Laos Human Rights Dialogue
    FIDH – International Federation for Human Rights and its member organization Lao Movement for Human Rights (LMHR) Briefing paper for the 10th EU-Laos Human Rights Dialogue 14 June 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 .… Political prisoners remain behind bars 2 .… Failure to cooperate with UN human rights mechanisms 3 .… Third UPR marks a step backward 3 .… Legislative elections fail to meet international standards 5 .… Freedom of expression stifled 6 .… Serious violations of religious freedoms persist 7 .… Negative impact of infrastructure and investment projects 11 .. COVID-19 affects infrastructure projects and their impact 12 .. Dam collapse survivors neglected There has been no improvement in the human rights situation in Laos in 2020-2021. Serious violations of civil and political rights, as well as social, economic, and cultural rights, have continued to occur and have remained unaddressed. This briefing paper provides a summary of key human rights developments during this period. Political prisoners remain behind bars Several individuals who have been imprisoned for the exercise of their right to freedom of opinion and expression remain behind bars. They include: • Ms. Houayheuang Xayabouly, aka Mouay, 32, who has been detained since 12 September 2019, is serving a five-year prison sentence on spurious charges under Article 117 of the Criminal Code (“Propaganda against the Lao People’s Democratic Republic”). Mouay is currently detained in Champasak provincial prison. • Mr. Somphone Phimmasone, 34, Mr. Soukan Chaithad, 37, and Ms. Lodkham Thammavong, approximately 35, who have been detained since March 2016, are serving prison sentences of 20, 16, and 12 years, respectively, on trumped-up charges under Articles 56, 65, and 72 of the Criminal Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Land Management Demonstration Sites
    Sustainable Land Management Demonstration Sites Established under the IFAD Grant ‘Scaling up Sustainable Land Management practices by smallholder farmers: working with agricultural extension services to identify, assess and disseminate SLM practices’. November 2020 For further information please contact: Bounthanom BOUAHOM [email protected], National Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development Research Institute (NAFRI) Nongviengkham village, Saythany district, Vientiane Lao PDR (+856) 021 770047 CDE CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT Sustainable Land Management Demonstration site 1: the compost (cow dung and sh feces) as well as the decaying Utilization of Water from a Fishpond to Irrigated Paddy Rice rice straws and other organic matters deposited at the bottom of the pond, as these provide the necessary nutrients for the rice to grow. Moreover, the movement of sh stimulates the changing of the water’s colour cause by sh movement. It also possible to improve the water quality by mixing in some of the animal dung, before the water is allowed to drain into the rice paddies. The water supply is retained in the shpond by rstly sourcing the water from the upstream location with the use of PVC pipes, and this avoids a direct ow into rice paddies. The farmers maintain the water at the required level and then allow a free discharge of overow into the rice paddies. If one compares the old practice of transferring water directly from the stream into rice paddies, the water owed slowly and it took a longer time to reach the sucient water level in the rice termites, insects and natural grasses was a challenge faced paddies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mage: Women Harvest Rice from Newly Planted Rice Paddies Grown Between the Rows of Stora Enso’S Eucalyptus Trees in Saravane Province
    Front cover image: Women harvest rice from newly planted rice paddies grown between the rows of Stora Enso’s Eucalyptus Trees in Saravane Province. In 2012, Stora Enso worked with Lao commercial company SBH to clear land for Eucalyptus Tree plantations. Top right image: Commercial company SBH doing UXO clearance for Stora Enso in Saravane Province. Bottom right image: UXO clearance at a popular tourist site in Xieng Khoung Province by MAG. 2012 ANNUAL REPORT This document acts as Annual Report of the National Regulatory Authority for UXO/Mine Action in Lao PDR. For further information, please contact the: National Regulatory Authority for UXO/Mine Action Sector in Lao PDR (NRA) Sisangvone Village, P.O. Box 7621, Unit 19, Saysettha District, Vientiane, Lao PDR Website: www.nra.gov.la Telephone: (856-21) 262386 Compiled and designed by: Vilavong SYSAVATH, Lasoy PHIPHAK, Olivier BAUDUIN and Chelsey PARISH. Graphic Design by: Chongkham PHONEKEO Layout by: Bounyasone (DK Art) Photos: Photos that appear in the Operator Reports, unless individually credited, were taken by and are the property of that Operator. All other photos in this report, unless individually creditied, have been taken by the following people - Vilavong SYSAVATH, Lasoy PHIPHAK, Chelsey PARISH, Sayfone SOUKHAVATH and Olivier BAUDUIN. Acknowledgements: The NRA would like to thank all UXO/Mine Action Sector Operators who provided images and information on their projects and activities in 2012 for this report. The NRA Programme and Public Relations Unit would also like to acknowledge the support and effort put in by all Members of the NRA team in helping to compile the 2012 UXO Sector Annual Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Laos 2012 International Religious Freedom Report
    LAOS 2012 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitution and some laws and policies protect religious freedom; however, enforcement of these laws and policies at the district and local levels was mixed. Other laws and policies restricted this right in practice, and the government generally enforced the restrictions. The trend in the government’s respect for religious freedom did not change significantly during the year. The law does not recognize a state religion; however, the government’s financial support and promotion of Buddhism, along with its willingness to exempt Buddhist groups from a number of restrictions, elevated the status of Buddhism. Officials respected the constitutional rights of members of most religious groups to worship, albeit within strict constraints imposed by the government. District and local authorities in some of the country’s 17 provinces continued to be suspicious of non-Buddhist religious groups and occasionally displayed intolerance for minority religious groups, particularly Protestant groups, whether or not officially recognized. There were reports of isolated cases of societal abuse or discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice. The refusal of some members of minority religious groups, particularly Protestants, to participate in local Buddhist or animist religious ceremonies sometimes resulted in friction. The U.S. government regularly raised specific religious freedom cases with the government. In an effort to establish an open dialogue and encourage conflict resolution, the embassy facilitated town hall meetings in three Savannakhet Province villages and one Salavan Province village embroiled in disputes between Protestant groups and the local authorities allied with Buddhist communities. The embassy also maintained frequent contact with a wide range of religious leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Report on International Religious Freedom » East Asia and Pacific » Laos
    Laos Page 1 of 10 Home » Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs » Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor » Releases » International Religious Freedom » 2010 Report on International Religious Freedom » East Asia and Pacific » Laos Laos BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR International Religious Freedom Report 2010 November 17, 2010 The constitution provides for freedom of religion; however, other laws and policies restricted this right in practice. The prime minister's Decree on Religious Practice (Decree 92) is the principal legal instrument defining rules for religious practice; it institutionalizes the government's role as the final arbiter of permissible religious activities. Although this decree has contributed to greater religious tolerance since it was promulgated in 2002, authorities, particularly at the provincial and district levels, have sometimes used its many conditions to restrict some aspects of religious practice. During the reporting period, the overall status of respect for religious freedom continued to be mixed, although Protestant, Catholic, and Baha'i communities in some areas enjoyed greater tolerance. As during previous reporting periods, officials in urban areas tended to show more acceptance of minority religious practice, with difficulties more frequently encountered in rural areas. The law does not recognize a state religion; however, the government's financial support and promotion of Buddhism, along with its willingness to exempt Buddhist groups from a number of restrictions, gave the religion an elevated status. In most areas officials typically respected the constitutionally guaranteed rights of members of most religious groups to worship, albeit within strict constraints imposed by the government. Authorities in some of the country's 17 provinces continued to be suspicious of non-Buddhist religious communities and occasionally displayed intolerance for minority religious groups, particularly Protestants, whether or not they were officially recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Assessment of Climate Change Adaptation Priorities in the Lao PDR
    Partner Report Series No 6 Scoping Assessment of Climate Change Adaptation Priorities in the Lao PDR EcoLao REGIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATIONKNOWLEDGEPLATFORM for Asia The Partner Report Series highlights the insights and outcomes of studies, assessments and other field activities that our national implementing partners have undertaken in their countries to mainstream adaptation into plans, policies and programmes. The intention of the series is to disseminate their findings to partners and relevant professionals in Asia. We welcome suggestions or comments. Suggested citation: EcoLao (2012). Scoping Assessment of Climate Change Adaptation Priorities in the Lao PDR. Regional Climate Change Adaptation Knowledge Platform for Asia, Partner Report Series No. 6. Stockholm Environment Institute, Bangkok. Available online at www.asiapacificadapt.net or www.weADAPT.org. About the author EcoLao is a Lao-owned Rural Development Contractor registered with the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for the provision and management of Lao counterpart technical services in rural development management; natural resources management; environmental, ecological and social impact management; and geographically based district and provincial development planning. Disclaimer The views or opinions expressed in this document belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of SEI, the Adaptation Knowledge Platform, partners or donors. Copyright SEI and AKP 2012 Front Cover: Photo Credit: Roengchai Kongmuang Back Cover: Photo Credit: Roengchai Kongmuang How to obtain the digital copy: This publication can be electronically downloaded from www.asiapacificadapt.net or weADAPT.org. This digital publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross Learning Field Visit Salavan Province, Lao PDR, 7-10 November
    Cross Learning Field Visit Salavan province, Lao PDR, 7-10 November 2018 American Refugee Committee (ARC) as a host of the Malaria CSO platform joined the field visit hosted by Ministry of Health, Lao PDR, Centre for Malariology, Parasitology & Entomology (CMPE), Laos CCM, together with local CSO partners Lao Positive Health Association (Lao PHA), PEDA and Health Poverty Action (HPA Laos) which met during 7-10 November 2018, in Salavan province of Lao PDR. The main objectives of the visit were 1) to interact with community people, malaria volunteers, community leaders, the malaria risk population, and service providers, 2) to identify the success and challenges at the field level, and document evidence of success and challenges in RAI2E implementation and shared with RAI RSC. The meeting and discussion with the RAI2E implementing CSOs, public health officers, village malaria worker, mobile malaria workers and community people were organized and the meeting was held during the visit. This report was developed as a part of a collaborative cross learning field visit activity coordinated by RAI RSC CSO platform in GMS. The activity enabled RAI RSC CSO representatives and other CSOs to interact with and learn from each other, allowing them to view and share practical experience of best practices, challenges and success in malaria response. This report is based on observations in the RAI implanting district of Salavan province during the visitation period and cannot be generalized for other areas. ARC on behalf of Malaria CSO platform would like to thanks all for the generosity of the individuals and partners for their support of this visit.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Laos 06 SO VL Signed 26-03-2018
    Final Report in scale Rural - 4710 : UNDP PIMS ID / 00084024 sia Pacific / A Laos PDR Effectivefor Governance Small / UNDP Project ID: , country/region:, 554 provinces of Sekong and Saravane climate change climate al area: c Terminal Evaluation “ Infrastructure and Disaster Preparedness in a Changing Climate Lao PDR GEF Project ID: 4 Fo sites: Project Evaluation timeframe: Acknowledgments: 01/10/2017 – 05/11/2017 The evaluation team wishes to thank the project team for their detailed Prepared by: assessment of the project situation, Mrs. Margaret Jones Williams from UNDP Environmental Unit as well as Mr. Vanxay Boutanavong for facilitating Mr Vincent Lefebvre the mission in the provinces. We are also grateful to Mr. Chanhao Mr Singha Ounniyom Xaiyathong and Mr. Sangviane Thidalak, respectively focal points of Sekong Date: 26/03/2018 and Saravane provinces for accompanying the team and facilitating the on- site contacts with district authorities and communities. Final report Terminal Evaluation “Effective Governance for Small-scale Rural Infrastructure and Disaster Preparedness in a Changing Climate in Lao PDR” 26/03/2018 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... III PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE..................................................................................................................................................... III PROJECT DESCRIPTION .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • C18 Main Perennial Crops
    CROPS C18 Main perennial crops Introduction Mango is grown as a main perennial crop in almost one quarter of all villages, but less in the regions where industrial perennial crops are planted. Although most arable land in the Lao PDR is devoted to annual crops, there has been a notable increase in the area under perennial crop In the past decade, rubber plantations have been established at a huge cultivation in recent years. Perennial (or permanent) crops are defined scale in the Lao PDR. Rubber trees were most widely planted in as crops with a production cycle of longer than one year such as fruit northwestern Lao PDR, particularly in Luang Namtha, Bokeo, Oudomxai and nut trees, banana, coffee, tea, cardamom and rubber. The area and Phongsaly, but also in central Lao PDR in Vientiane, Bolikhamxai and under perennial crops in the Lao PDR is around 151,000 ha, covering 10 Khammouan. The map shows that in the northwestern provinces, but percent of total agricultural land. However, the area under perennial crops also in some central provinces, rubber has become the main perennial has more than doubled over the decade from 1999 to 2011. crop for many villages. There is also a notable amount of rubber planted in southern Lao PDR, but this is primarily done by foreign companies under A significant increase occurred in all regions of the Lao PDR, but most a plantation model and is thus not included in this data. prominently in the northern provinces. This was the result of various programs supported by the GoL and international donors which Banana is a traditional perennial crop grown across the country for promoted perennial crops as alternatives to shifting cultivation.
    [Show full text]