View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE providedDispatch by ElsevierR613 - Publisher Connector

Cell cycle: Checkpoint and kinetochores Aaron F. Straight

Vertebrate homologs of yeast spindle assembly spindle and the alignment of the chromosomes. Cells with checkpoint proteins are localized to kinetochores and an intact mitotic spindle will still arrest in if a may act as a sensor for proper chromosome attachment single chromosome is not properly attached to the spindle to the mitotic spindle. (Figure 1b) [11]. This arrest is caused by an inhibitory signal emanating from kinetochores that are not attached Address: Department of Physiology, Box 0444, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0444, USA. to the [12]. E-mail: [email protected] Genetic studies in yeast have identified some of the Current Biology 1997, 7:R613–R616 molecules involved in the spindle assembly checkpoint. http://biomednet.com/elecref/09609822007R0613 Like vertebrate cells, budding yeast cells arrest in mitosis © Current Biology Ltd ISSN 0960-9822 in response to spindle depolymerization [13]. Yeast mutants were isolated that died rapidly when treated with Cells carefully monitor the alignment of chromosomes on the spindle-depolymerizing drug benomyl. These the mitotic spindle to ensure that their chromosomes are mutants — mad1, mad2 and mad3, and bub1, bub2 and bub3 properly segregated at . Detachment of kineto- — all fail to activate the spindle assembly checkpoint and chores from microtubules or depolymerization of the continue through mitosis without a spindle. Although the mitotic spindle activates a checkpoint mechanism that mutants die rapidly in the presence of benomyl, the mad arrests the prior to the initiation of anaphase. This and bub gene products do not appear to be directly ‘spindle assembly checkpoint’ allows the cell time to involved in spindle integrity, as the mutant strains have correct the offending lesion so that it can proceed through normal spindles [3,5]. Instead, mad and bub mutants are mitosis without chromosome missegregation [1,2]. Proteins thought to be defective in the signalling mechanism that involved in the spindle assembly checkpoint have been iso- arrests the cell cycle in response to spindle depolymeriza- lated in budding yeast and in vertebrates [3–7]. Cells tion. Wells and Murray [8] showed that excess kineto- lacking components of the spindle assembly checkpoint can chores in budding yeast cells cause pronounced cell cycle proceed through mitosis in the absence of a spindle or in delays in mitosis. These cell cycle delays are absent in the the presence of unattached chromosomes [3,5,8]. mad and bub mutants, suggesting that the Mad and Bub proteins are involved in monitoring chromosome attach- Recent work has shown that two of the spindle assembly ment to kinetochores as well as spindle integrity. checkpoint proteins, Mad2 and Bub1, localize to the kine- tochores of vertebrate cells for part of mitosis. The kinetochore as the mechanism and the sensor for and chromosomes show kinetochore local- mitotic spindle attachment ization of Mad2 and Bub1, but as chromosomes align on Kinetochores mediate attachment of the chromosomes to the plate the kinetochore staining disappears the mitotic spindle. When a microtubule contacts a kinet- and does not reappear until the next cell cycle (Figure 1a). ochore, the kinetochore captures the microtubule [14,15]. Misaligned chromosomes show Mad2 and Bub1 localiza- These kinetochore–microtubule attachments rearrange tion at the kinetochore even when all other chromosomes until sister kinetochores are attached to opposite poles of reside on the metaphase plate (Figure 1b,c) [4,6,7]. These the spindle. In insect cells, tension on the kinetochores results suggest that the kinetochore both monitors the further stabilizes kinetochore–microtubule interactions, attachment of the chromosome to the spindle and signals thus promoting bipolar attachment of the chromosomes to the cell to arrest until chromosomes are properly aligned. the spindle [16,17]. Once kinetochores are attached to the spindle microtubules, the kinetochores mediate congres- The spindle assembly checkpoint sion of the chromosomes to the metaphase plate [18] and Early experiments in the 1930s showed that, when verte- cells do not initiate anaphase until all chromosomes are brate cells are treated with drugs that depolymerize the properly aligned. mitotic spindle, they arrest in mitosis [9,10]. The mitotic arrest in these cells was attributed to the removal of the Kinetochores can sense proper attachment to the mitotic mechanical apparatus that separates the chromosomes — spindle. Proteins at the kinetochore are specifically phos- the mitotic spindle. Recent work has shown that the phorylated dependent upon their proper attachment to absence of the spindle itself is not the cause of the mitotic the mitotic spindle. In insect cells, kinetochores that are arrest, but that the arrest is mediated through the activa- not attached to the mitotic spindle, and kinetochores tion of a checkpoint that monitors the integrity of the that have only attached to one pole of the spindle, stain R614 Current Biology, Vol 7 No 10

Figure 1

(a) Prophase Metaphase Anaphase

Mad Mad Bub Bub

Mad Bub Mad Bub

(b) Misaligned chromosome Error correction

Mad Mad Bub Bub

Mad Bub Mad Bub

Mad Bub Mitotic arrest

(c) Spindle depolymerization Adaptation

Mad Mad Bub Bub Mad Mad Mad Bub Bub Bub Mad Mad Bub Bub Mad Bub

Mitotic arrest © 1997 Current Biology

Mad2 and Bub1 proteins reside at kinetochores and mediate checkpoint (c) Spindle depolymerization causes mitotic arrest. In the absence of a arrest of the cell cycle. (a) During a normal mitosis, Mad2 and Bub1 spindle, Mad2 and Bub1 remain at the kinetochores of chromosomes localize to kinetochores in prophase and prometaphase. Once all and the cell arrests in mitosis. The checkpoint arrest can be overcome by chromosomes are attached to the spindle, cells proceed through two mechanisms: by error correction, the cell can correct the offending anaphase. (b) Misaligned chromosomes signal spindle assembly lesion and process through a normal mitosis; by adaptation, the cell can checkpoint arrest. Chromosomes that are not properly attached to the override the checkpoint arrest, in the presence of the defect, resulting in spindle maintain Mad2 at the kinetochore and the cell arrests in mitosis. an abnormal mitosis with the potential for chromosome loss. brightly with the 3F3/2 antibody, which recognizes a spindle by modifying the resident kinetochore proteins phospho-epitope at the kinetochores of mammalian and (reviewed in [19]). insect cells. When chromosomes achieve a bipolar attach- ment to the spindle and the sister kinetochores come The spindle assembly checkpoint meets the kinetochore under tension, the staining of the 3F3/2 epitope is dimin- Three recent papers report that spindle assembly check- ished. This loss of 3F3/2 staining can be mimicked by point proteins reside at the kinetochore and regulate pulling on a mono-attached chromosome so as artificially passage through mitosis. Chen et al. [6] and Li and to apply tension to the kinetochore. Cells that are Benezra [4] isolated, respectively, the Xenopus (XMAD2) microinjected with the 3F3 antibody delay dephosphory- and human (hsMAD2) homologs of the yeast Mad2, and lation of the kinetochore and pause in mitosis. Thus, the Taylor and McKeon [7] isolated the mouse homolog kinetochore responds to proper attachment to the (mBub1) of yeast Bub1. All of these proteins localize to Dispatch R615

the kinetochores of chromosomes in cultured cells of the Does the lack of a spindle assembly checkpoint affect the organisms from which they were isolated. Interestingly, in timing of a normal cell cycle? Taylor and McKeon [7] all three organisms, the checkpoint proteins only localize investigated this question by examining the effect of to the kinetochores of cells in prophase and prometaphase, overexpressing the mBub1 amino-terminal domain on the prior to proper chromosome alignment on the metaphase timing of the cell cycle. They found that the overexpres- plate, or of cells that have been treated with nocodazole to sion had no effect on the timing of G1, S or G2 phases of depolymerize the mitotic spindle (Figure 1a,c). the cell cycle, but delayed the exit from mitosis by approximately 25 minutes. Yeast cells that lack the spindle To investigate further the relationship between chromo- assembly checkpoint Mad1 are also accelerated in some attachment to the spindle and XMAD2 staining, their exit from mitosis (P. Dann and A. Rudner, personal Chen et al. [6] took advantage of cells that had attached all communication). Thus, the spindle checkpoint may have but one or two chromosomes to both spindle poles. Chro- a role during the normal cell cycle in restraining the mosomes that had only attached a single kinetochore to passage through mitosis. the spindle showed no XMAD2 staining on the attached kinetochore, but bright XMAD2 staining on the unat- Other proteins involved in the spindle assembly check- tached sister kinetochore (Figure 1b). Thus, the check- point have been found to be resident components of the point proteins at the kinetochore respond to microtubule kinetochore. Studies with budding yeast have shown that attachment to the kinetochore. the Mad2 protein interacts tightly with another spindle assembly checkpoint protein, Mad1, and studies with Mad2 and Bub1 are required for the spindle assembly Xenopus extracts have shown that XMAD2 interacts with a checkpoint in vertebrate cells. Chen et al. [6] and Li and Mad1-like protein (R. Chen and K. Hardwick, personal Benezra [4] showed that antibodies against Mad2 blocked communication). The Mad1 protein has also been shown the spindle assembly checkpoint. The spindle assembly to be phosphorylated by the protein kinase Mps1, and checkpoint can be reconstituted in vitro using extracts of overexpression of Mps1 causes constitutive activation of Xenopus laevis eggs [20]. Using X. laevis egg extracts, Chen et the spindle assembly checkpoint [22]. The Bub1 protein al. [6] showed that the addition of anti-XMAD2 antibodies kinase also interacts with another checkpoint protein, to a checkpoint-arrested extract inactivated the checkpoint Bub3, forming an active kinase complex [21]. Thus, the and allowed progression through mitosis. Additionally, cells kinetochore may contain as many as five proteins directly that were treated with anti-XMAD2 prior to checkpoint involved in the spindle assembly checkpoint, two of which activation were unable to establish a checkpoint arrest. Li are protein kinases. and Benezra [4] took a related approach to test the function of hsMAD2 in tissue culture cells. Antibodies to hsMAD2 Integrating information at the kinetochore with the cell were electroporated into tissue culture cells, then the cells cycle engine were treated with nocodazole to depolymerize the spindle. Exit from mitosis is normally mediated by ubiquitin-depen- Cells that received the hsMAD2 antibodies failed to arrest dent proteolysis of B-type , resulting in a drop in in the presence of nocodazole. -dependent kinase levels [23]. Activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint blocks exit from mitosis, The kinetochore-localization domain of mBub1 resides in arresting cells with high B-type cyclin levels and elevated its amino terminus. Taylor and McKeon [7] overexpressed cyclin-dependent kinase activity [20,24]. The question the this amino-terminal mBub1 domain in tissue culture remains as to how the kinetochore generates the signal to cells. The overexpressing cells arrested poorly compared arrest the cell cycle, and how that signal is transduced to the to wild-type cells in the presence of nocodazole. Overex- cell cycle machinery. Studies with X. laevis extracts have pression of full-length Bub1 in yeast confers a similar shown that a well known component of kinase cascades, the phenotype, causing cells to become hypersensitive to mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase ERK-2, is spindle depolymerization [21]. It is likely that Bub1 over- required for both the establishment and maintenance of the expression disrupts the ability of the kinetochore to signal spindle assembly checkpoint [20]. In addition, studies with checkpoint arrest in the absence of a spindle. Checkpoint- yeast have shown that mutations in a B-type subunit of a arrested tissue culture cells eventually recover from the type-II protein phosphatase cause a spindle assembly arrest and die, exhibiting characteristics of checkpoint phenotype [24,25]. Recent experiments suggest (Figure 1, adaptation). In contrast, cells that express the that the inhibitory signal for checkpoint arrest may not be amino-terminal mBub1 fragment lack the checkpoint, mediated by a soluble factor, because the signal is not trans- continue into the next cell cycle, and become polyploid ferred between two spindles in the same cytoplasm [26]. without signs of apoptotic elimination. The spindle assembly checkpoint may serve a dual role in mediating One of the most attractive targets of the checkpoint signal arrest so that the cell can correct errors, and in the elimina- is the cyclososme/anaphase-promoting complex (APC), tion of damaged cells. the enzyme that ubiquitinates cyclins, targeting them for R616 Current Biology, Vol 7 No 10

destruction [23]. Cyclin ubiquitination activity is inhibited 21. Roberts RT, Farr KA, Hoyt MA: The Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint gene BUB1 encodes a novel protein kinase. Mol Cell in extracts from checkpoint-arrested yeast cells, but it is Biol 1994, 14:8282-8291. not known whether this is a direct or indirect effect of the 22. Hardwick KG, Weiss E, Luca FC, Winey M, Murray AW: Activation of checkpoint on the cyclosome/APC [27]. Other targets, the budding yeast spindle assembly checkpoint without mitotic spindle disruption. Science 1996, 273:953-956. such as the proteasome itself or the hydrolases that 23. King RW, Deshaies RJ, Peters JM, Kirschner MW: How proteolysis remove ubiquitin from proteins, are still potential candi- drives the cell cycle. Science 1996, 274:1652-1659. 24. Minshull J, Straight A, Rudner A, Dernburg A, Belmont A, Murray AW: dates for regulation. Although the signalling pathway from Protein phosphatase 2A regulates MPF activity and sister the kinetochore to the cell cycle engine is unknown, chromatid cohesion in budding yeast. Curr Biol 1996, current studies suggest that checkpoint proteins on kine- 6:1609-1620. 25. Wang Y, Burke DJ: Cdc55p, the B-type regulatory subunit of tochores are able to sense the attachment of the chromo- protein phosphatase 2A, has multiple functions in mitosis and is somes to the spindle microtubules and, in response to required for the kinetochore/spindle checkpoint in improper attachment, delay the cell cycle in order to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1997, 17:620-626. 26. Rieder CL, Khodjakov A, Paliulis LV, Fortier TM, Cole RW, Sluder G: promote faithful . Mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells with two spindles: implications for the metaphase/anaphase transition checkpoint and cleavage. References Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:5107-5112. TPR proteins required for anaphase 1. Rudner AD, Murray AW: The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr 27. Zachariae W, Nasmyth K: progression mediate ubiquitination of mitotic B-type cyclins in Opin Cell Biol 1996, 8:773-780. yeast. 7 2. Wells WAE: The spindle-assembly checkpoint: aiming for a Mol Biol Cell 1996, :791-801. perfect mitosis, every time. Trends Cell Biol 1996, 6:228-234. 3. Li R, Murray AW: Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 1991, 66:519-531. 4. Li Y, Benezra R: Identification of a human mitotic checkpoint gene: hsMAD2. Science 1996, 274:246-248. 5. Hoyt MA, Trotis L, Roberts BT: S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 1991, 66:507-517. 6. Chen R-H, Waters JC, Salmon ED, Murray AW: Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMAD2 with unattached kinetochores. Science 1996, 274:242-246. 7. Taylor SS, McKeon F: Kinetochore localization of murine Bub1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to spindle damage. Cell 1997, 89:727-735. 8. Wells WAE, Murray AW: Aberrantly segregating centromeres activate the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 1996, 133:75-84. 9. Brues AM, Cohen A: Effects of colchicine and related substances on . Biochem J 1936, 30:1363. 10. Brues AM, Jackson EB: Nuclear abnormalities resulting from inhibition of mitosis by colchicine and other substances. Am J Cancer 1937, 30:504-511. 11. Rieder CL, Schultz A, Cole R, Sluder G: Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J Cell Biol 1994, 127:1301-1310. 12. Rieder CL, Cole RW, Khodjakov A, Sluder G: The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J Cell Biol 1995, 130:941-948. 13. Clayton L, Pogson CI, Gull K: Microtubule proteins in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 1979, 106:67-70. 14. Merdes A, De Mey J: The mechanism of kinetochore-spindle attachment and polewards movement analyzed in PtK2 cells at the prophase-prometaphase transition. Eur J Cell Biol 1990, 53:313-325. 15. Hayden JH, Bowser SS, Rieder CL: Kinetochores capture astral microtubules during chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle: direct visualization in live newt lung cells. J Cell Biol 1990, 111:1039-1045. 16. Ault JG, Nicklas RB: Tension, microtubule rearrangements, and the proper distribution of chromosomes in mitosis. Chromosoma 1989, 98:33-39. 17. Nicklas RB, Ward SC: Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. J Cell Biol 1994, 126:1241-1253. 18. Rieder CL, Salmon ED: Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle. J Cell Biol 1994, 124:223-233. 19. Nicklas RB: How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 1997, 275:632-637. 20. Minshull J, Sun H, Tonks NK, Murray AW: MAP-kinase dependent mitotic feedback arrest in Xenopus egg extracts. Cell 1994, 79:475-486.