DOCSLIB.ORG

The CDK1 Inhibitory Kinase MYT1 in DNA Damage Checkpoint Recovery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The CDK1 Inhibitory Kinase MYT1 in DNA Damage Checkpoint Recovery Oncogene (2013) 32, 4778–4788 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/13 www.nature.com/onc ORIGINAL ARTICLE The CDK1 inhibitory kinase MYT1 in DNA damage checkpoint recovery JPH Chow and RYC Poon Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) by phosphorylation is a key regulatory mechanism for both the unperturbed cell cycle and the DNA damage checkpoint. Although both WEE1 and MYT1 can phosphorylate CDK1, little is known about the contribution of MYT1. We found that in contrast to WEE1, MYT1 was not important for the normal cell cycle or checkpoint activation. Time-lapse microscopy indicated that MYT1 did, however, have a rate-determining role during checkpoint recovery. Depletion of MYT1 induced precocious mitotic entry when the checkpoint was abrogated with inhibitors of either CHK1 or WEE1, indicating that MYT1 contributes to checkpoint recovery independently of WEE1. The acceleration of checkpoint recovery in MYT1-depleted cells was due to a lowering of threshold for CDK1 activation. The kinase activity of MYT1 was high during checkpoint activation and reduced during checkpoint recovery. Importantly, although depletion of MYT1 alone did not affect long- term cell growth, it potentiated with DNA damage to inhibit cell growth in clonogenic survival and tumor xenograft models. These results reveal the functions of MYT1 in checkpoint recovery and highlight the potential of MYT1 as a target for anti-cancer therapies. Oncogene (2013) 32, 4778–4788; doi:10.1038/onc.2012.504; published online 12 November 2012 Keywords: cell cycle; checkpoint; ionizing radiation INTRODUCTION CHK1/CHK2, which in turn inactivates CDC25 (reviewed in Chen 15 Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) is one of the major kinases for and Poon ). This response tips the balance of the CDK1 Thr14/ driving cells into mitosis. Its activation requires the binding of Tyr15 phosphorylation toward inactivation of the kinase. Indeed, cyclin B and the phosphorylation of the T-loop. Cyclin B starts to the checkpoint induced by ionizing radiation (IR) can be abrogated 16 accumulate from S phase and is destroyed at the end of mitosis.1 by overexpressing a non-phosphorylatable CDK1 mutant. Before mitosis, cyclin B–CDK1 complexes are inactivated through Once damaged DNA is repaired, the checkpoint has to be phosphorylation of Thr14 and Tyr15 by WEE1 and MYT1.2,3 While switched off to restart the cell cycle. This requires CDC25B, but not WEE1 specifically phosphorylates Tyr15, MYT1 shows a preference CDC25A and CDC25C, indicating a divergence of the roles of cell for Thr14. cycle components in checkpoint recovery and unperturbed cell 4 Just before mitosis, WEE1 and MYT1 are downregulated to allow cycle. Similarly, although PLK1 is not required for normal mitotic 4 CDK1 activation. The NH2-terminal region of WEE1 is phosphory- entry, it is important for checkpoint recovery. While WEE1 is lated by CDK1, PLK1 and CK2, creating a phosphodegron for known to have an important role in the G2 DNA damage 17 SCFbTrCP-dependent degradation.4–6 Any residual WEE1 is also checkpoint, next to nothing is known about the function of inhibited by CDK1- and AKT/PKB-dependent phosphorylation as MYT1 in the checkpoint. well as by binding to PIN1.7 By contrast, relatively little is known In this study, we have investigated the functions of MYT1 in about how MYT1 is inactivated. In mammalian cells, the checkpoint recovery. We found that while MYT1 was not essential inactivation of MYT1 coincides with its phosphorylation by PLK1 for the unperturbed cell cycle or the activation of the DNA damage and CDK1.2,8,9 checkpoint, it had a rate-determining function in checkpoint WEE1 has an indispensable role in controlling the timing of recovery. Downregulation of MYT1 also promoted DNA damage- mitosis during normal cell cycle. Depletion of WEE1 resulted in mediated cytotoxicity in cell line and nude mice models. premature chromosome condensation.10 By contrast, MYT1 appears to have a relatively minor role in the somatic cell cycle.11 As MYT1 is the only CDK1 inhibitory kinase in prophase- RESULTS arrested Xenopus oocytes, MYT1 is believed to have an important MYT1 is not involved in the control of the unperturbed cell cycle 12 role in the meiotic cycle during early development. Under this and activation of the G2 DNA damage checkpoint condition, MYT1 is inactivated by XRINGO- and CDK-mediated We started by analyzing the temporal expression pattern of MYT1 phosphorylation.13 In starfish, MYT1 activity is downregulated by in HeLa cells. Cells were released from a double thymidine AKT-dependent phosphorylation during meiosis.14 synchronization procedure and harvested every 3 h. Mitosis Proper cell cycle progression requires several checkpoints that occurred at between 9–12 h, as indicated by the DNA contents Tyr15 regulate the activities of CDKs. The G2 DNA damage checkpoint and the expression of phosphos-CDK and mitotic cyclins exerts its effect mainly through the inhibitory phosphorylation of (Figure 1a). While the expression of WEE1 decreased during CDK1. Upon DNA damage, ATM/ATR phosphorylates and activates mitosis, MYT1 displayed a dramatic gel mobility shift. Addition of Division of Life Science and Center for Cancer Research, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong. Correspondence: Professor RYC Poon, Division of Life Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong. E-mail: [email protected] Received 10 May 2012; revised 14 September 2012; accepted 18 September 2012; published online 12 November 2012 MYT1 in checkpoint recovery JPH Chow et al 4779 Figure 1. MYT1 is not important for the unperturbed cell cycle. (a) Level and phosphorylation of MYT1 during the cell cycle. HeLa cells were synchronized with a double thymidine block method. At different time points after released from the block, the cells were harvested and analyzed with flow cytometry (the positions of 2N and 4N DNA contents are indicated). Lysates were also prepared and the expression of the indicated proteins was analyzed with immunoblotting. Uniform loading of lysates was confirmed by immunoblotting for actin. The positions of the phosphorylated and unmodified MYT1 are indicated. (b) Gel mobility shift of MYT1 during mitosis is phosphorylation-dependent. MYT1 was immunoprecipitated from mitotic cell extracts (from cells collected at 12 h after release from double thymidine block as described in panel a). The immunoprecipitates were treated with either buffer or lPPase. The gel mobility of MYT1 was then analyzed with immunoblotting. (c) MYT1 is not required for the activation of various checkpoints. HeLa cells were either mock-transfected or transfected with siRNA against MYT1 (siMYT1). After 48 h, the cells were treated with hydroxyurea (HU), IR or nocodazole (NOC) for 16 h. Lysates were then prepared and the expression of the indicated proteins was analyzed with immunoblotting. Equal loading of lysates was confirmed by immunoblotting for actin. (d) MYT1 is not required for checkpoint-induced cell cycle arrest. Cells were transfected and treated as in panel c. The cells were then fixed and analyzed with flow cytometry. (e) MYT1 depletion does not affect the timing of mitotic entry. HeLa cells expressing histone H2B-GFP were transfected with siRNAs against MYT1, PLK1 or WEE1. The cells were synchronized with a double thymidine procedure and released into the cell cycle. Time-lapse microscopy was used to analyze the time taken by individual cells to enter mitosis (mean±90% confidence coefficient; n ¼ 30). The original data of the individual cells are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. the proteasome inhibitor MG132 stabilized WEE1 and cyclin A2 slower-migrating form of MYT1 after lambda phosphatase without affecting MYT1 (Supplementary Figure S1A), verifying that treatment verified that MYT1 was strongly phosphorylated during MYT1 was not regulated by degradation. The disappearance of the mitosis (Figure 1b).9 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited Oncogene (2013) 4778 – 4788 MYT1 in checkpoint recovery JPH Chow et al 4780 To study the functions of MYT1, we depleted MYT1 with small indicate that unlike that for WEE1, there is no evidence that MYT1 interfering RNAs (siRNAs) (siMYT1) and verified the depletion with has a role in the timing of mitosis during the unperturbed cell immunoblotting (Figure 1c). This resulted in negligible effects on cycle of HeLa cells. normal cell cycle distribution (Figure 1d). MYT1-depleted cells were able to be trapped by hydroxyurea, IR or nocodazole in S phase, G2 phase or mitosis, respectively, indicating that the proper MYT1 is a component of the checkpoint recovery network activation of the various checkpoints did not require MYT1. Time- Several potential cell cycle regulators including PLK1 and CDC25B lapse microscopy also confirmed DNA damage was able to induce appear to be non-essential for normal G2–M transition, yet have a cell cycle arrest in MYT1-depleted cells (see below). important roles during the recovery of the G2 DNA damage WEE1 prevents premature activation of cyclin–CDK1 complexes checkpoint.19 To determine whether MYT1 is involved in during G2 phase. To evaluate the possible contribution of MYT1 on checkpoint recovery, siMYT1 was transfected before DNA the timing of mitosis, cells expressing histone H2B-GFP were damage was introduced with IR. HeLa cells were used as a generated and transfected with siMYT1. After they were model because IR exclusively activated the G2 DNA damage synchronously released from a double thymidine block, individual checkpoint in these cells (p53 is degraded by HPV E6). We used a cells were then tracked with time-lapse microscopy to monitor the CHK1 inhibitor (UCN-01) to turn off the checkpoint, thereby timing of mitosis (Supplementary Figure S2). The average time mimicking checkpoint recovery and inducing mitosis taken for the control cells to enter mitosis was B600 min synchronously in the population.20 Time-lapse microscopy (Figure 1e). This period was dramatically reduced to B300 min confirmed that almost no cell underwent mitosis after IR when WEE1 was downregulated with siRNA.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proteomic Based Approaches for Differentiating Tumor Subtypes
    Proteomic Based Approaches for Differentiating Tumor Subtypes DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Linan Wang Graduate Program in Integrated Biomedical Science Program The Ohio State University 2017 Dissertation Committee: Michael Alan Freitas, PhD Advisor Charles Lawrence Hitchcock, MD/PhD Kun Huang, PhD Mark Robert Parthun, PhD Copyright by Linan Wang 2017 Abstract In medicine, successful patient treatment relies on early and accurate diagnosis. Following diagnosis disease specific and effective treatments are necessary, targeting affected cells while sparing normal tissue. While past studies have focused on genomics, the importance of transcriptomics and proteomics is increasingly understood. Proteomics, the study of proteins, will be the focus of this dissertation. Proteomics provide insight in the post transcriptional and translational regulation of proteins, information not available through the study of DNA and RNA alone. These effects play an important role in protein quantity and physiological function. It is well established that changes in protein homeostasis are associated with disease conditions, hence providing the grounds for biomarker discovery. It has been shown that if homeostasis can be restored, disease conditions can be reversed, further emphasizing the role of proteomics in therapeutic target discovery. Chapter 1 highlights the importance of proteomics in the field of biomedical research with an emphasis on clinical translational sciences in moving discoveries from bench to bedside. Chapters 2 of this dissertation describe the development of methodology for the study of archived clinical biopsy samples. Following biopsy, patient tissue is preserved with formalin fixation and paraffin embedding (FFPE) and archived.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Damage Checkpoint Dynamics Drive Cell Cycle Phase Transitions
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/137307; this version posted August 4, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. DNA damage checkpoint dynamics drive cell cycle phase transitions Hui Xiao Chao1,2, Cere E. Poovey1, Ashley A. Privette1, Gavin D. Grant3,4, Hui Yan Chao1, Jeanette G. Cook3,4, and Jeremy E. Purvis1,2,4,† 1Department of Genetics 2Curriculum for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology 3Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics 4Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 120 Mason Farm Road Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7264 †Corresponding Author: Jeremy Purvis Genetic Medicine Building 5061, CB#7264 120 Mason Farm Road Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7264 [email protected] ABSTRACT DNA damage checkpoints are cellular mechanisms that protect the integrity of the genome during cell cycle progression. In response to genotoxic stress, these checkpoints halt cell cycle progression until the damage is repaired, allowing cells enough time to recover from damage before resuming normal proliferation. Here, we investigate the temporal dynamics of DNA damage checkpoints in individual proliferating cells by observing cell cycle phase transitions following acute DNA damage. We find that in gap phases (G1 and G2), DNA damage triggers an abrupt halt to cell cycle progression in which the duration of arrest correlates with the severity of damage. However, cells that have already progressed beyond a proposed “commitment point” within a given cell cycle phase readily transition to the next phase, revealing a relaxation of checkpoint stringency during later stages of certain cell cycle phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Hidden Targets in RAF Signalling Pathways to Block Oncogenic RAS Signalling
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review Hidden Targets in RAF Signalling Pathways to Block Oncogenic RAS Signalling Aoife A. Nolan 1, Nourhan K. Aboud 1, Walter Kolch 1,2,* and David Matallanas 1,* 1 Systems Biology Ireland, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; [email protected] (A.A.N.); [email protected] (N.K.A.) 2 Conway Institute of Biomolecular & Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland * Correspondence: [email protected] (W.K.); [email protected] (D.M.) Abstract: Oncogenic RAS (Rat sarcoma) mutations drive more than half of human cancers, and RAS inhibition is the holy grail of oncology. Thirty years of relentless efforts and harsh disappointments have taught us about the intricacies of oncogenic RAS signalling that allow us to now get a pharma- cological grip on this elusive protein. The inhibition of effector pathways, such as the RAF-MEK-ERK pathway, has largely proven disappointing. Thus far, most of these efforts were aimed at blocking the activation of ERK. Here, we discuss RAF-dependent pathways that are regulated through RAF functions independent of catalytic activity and their potential role as targets to block oncogenic RAS signalling. We focus on the now well documented roles of RAF kinase-independent functions in apoptosis, cell cycle progression and cell migration. Keywords: RAF kinase-independent; RAS; MST2; ASK; PLK; RHO-α; apoptosis; cell cycle; cancer therapy Citation: Nolan, A.A.; Aboud, N.K.; Kolch, W.; Matallanas, D. Hidden Targets in RAF Signalling Pathways to Block Oncogenic RAS Signalling.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclin-Dependent Kinases and P53 Pathways Are Activated Independently and Mediate Bax Activation in Neurons After DNA Damage
    The Journal of Neuroscience, July 15, 2001, 21(14):5017–5026 Cyclin-Dependent Kinases and P53 Pathways Are Activated Independently and Mediate Bax Activation in Neurons after DNA Damage Erick J. Morris,1 Elizabeth Keramaris,2 Hardy J. Rideout,3 Ruth S. Slack,2 Nicholas J. Dyson,1 Leonidas Stefanis,3 and David S. Park2 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129, 2Neuroscience Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8M5, Canada, and 3Columbia University, New York, New York 10032 DNA damage has been implicated as one important initiator of ization, and DNA binding that result from DNA damage are not cell death in neuropathological conditions such as stroke. Ac- affected by the inhibition of CDK activity. Conversely, no de- cordingly, it is important to understand the signaling processes crease in retinoblastoma protein (pRb) phosphorylation was that control neuronal death induced by this stimulus. Previous observed in p53-deficient neurons that were treated with camp- evidence has shown that the death of embryonic cortical neu- tothecin. However, either p53 deficiency or the inhibition of rons treated with the DNA-damaging agent camptothecin is CDK activity alone inhibited Bax translocation, cytochrome c dependent on the tumor suppressor p53 and cyclin-dependent release, and caspase-3-like activation. Taken together, our re- kinase (CDK) activity and that the inhibition of either pathway sults indicate that p53 and CDK are activated independently alone leads to enhanced and prolonged survival. We presently and then act in concert to control Bax-mediated apoptosis. show that p53 and CDKs are activated independently on par- allel pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Tumor Suppressor PLK2 May Serve As a Biomarker in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer for Improved Response to PLK1 Therapeutics
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.16.448722; this version posted June 16, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Tumor suppressor PLK2 may serve as a biomarker in triple-negative breast cancer for improved response to PLK1 therapeutics Yang Gao1, 2, 3, Elena B. Kabotyanski1, 2, Elizabeth Villegas7, Jonathan H. Shepherd8, Deanna Acosta1, 2, Clark Hamor1, 2, Tingting Sun2,4,5, Celina Montmeyor-Garcia9, Xiaping He8, Lacey E. Dobrolecki1, 2, 3, Thomas F. Westbrook2, 4, 5, Michael T. Lewis1, 2, 3, Susan G. Hilsenbeck2, 3, Xiang H.-F. Zhang1, 2, 3, 6, Charles M. Perou8 and Jeffrey M. Rosen1, 2 1Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology 2Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center 3Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center 4Department of Molecular and Human Genetics 5Verna & Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 6McNair Medical Institute Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA 7University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX 77002, USA 8The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA 9 Canadian Blood Services, Toronto, ON M5G 2M1, Canada Correspondence to Jeffrey M. Rosen (Mail Stop: BCM130, Room: BCM-M638a, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030. Office: 713-798-6210. Fax: 713-898-8012. Email: [email protected]) 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.16.448722; this version posted June 16, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cryoelectron Microscopy Structure of the Human CDK-Activating Kinase
    The cryoelectron microscopy structure of the human CDK-activating kinase Basil J. Grebera,b,1,2, Juan M. Perez-Bertoldic, Kif Limd, Anthony T. Iavaronee, Daniel B. Tosoa, and Eva Nogalesa,b,d,f,2 aCalifornia Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; bMolecular Biophysics and Integrative Bio-Imaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720; cBiophysics Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; dDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; eQB3/Chemistry Mass Spectrometry Facility, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; and fHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Edited by Seth A. Darst, Rockefeller University, New York, NY, and approved August 4, 2020 (received for review May 14, 2020) The human CDK-activating kinase (CAK), a complex composed of phosphoryl transfer (11). However, in addition to cyclin binding, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 7, cyclin H, and MAT1, is a critical full activation of cell cycle CDKs requires phosphorylation of the regulator of transcription initiation and the cell cycle. It acts by T-loop (9, 12). In animal cells, these activating phosphorylations phosphorylating the C-terminal heptapeptide repeat domain of are carried out by CDK7 (13, 14), itself a cyclin-dependent ki- the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) subunit RPB1, which is an important nase whose activity depends on cyclin H (14). regulatory event in transcription initiation by Pol II, and it phos- In human and other metazoan cells, regulation of transcription phorylates the regulatory T-loop of CDKs that control cell cycle initiation by phosphorylation of the Pol II-CTD and phosphor- progression.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide Association Study to Identify Genomic Regions And
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Genome‑wide association study to identify genomic regions and positional candidate genes associated with male fertility in beef cattle H. Sweett1, P. A. S. Fonseca1, A. Suárez‑Vega1, A. Livernois1,2, F. Miglior1 & A. Cánovas1* Fertility plays a key role in the success of calf production, but there is evidence that reproductive efciency in beef cattle has decreased during the past half‑century worldwide. Therefore, identifying animals with superior fertility could signifcantly impact cow‑calf production efciency. The objective of this research was to identify candidate regions afecting bull fertility in beef cattle and positional candidate genes annotated within these regions. A GWAS using a weighted single‑step genomic BLUP approach was performed on 265 crossbred beef bulls to identify markers associated with scrotal circumference (SC) and sperm motility (SM). Eight windows containing 32 positional candidate genes and fve windows containing 28 positional candidate genes explained more than 1% of the genetic variance for SC and SM, respectively. These windows were selected to perform gene annotation, QTL enrichment, and functional analyses. Functional candidate gene prioritization analysis revealed 14 prioritized candidate genes for SC of which MAP3K1 and VIP were previously found to play roles in male fertility. A diferent set of 14 prioritized genes were identifed for SM and fve were previously identifed as regulators of male fertility (SOD2, TCP1, PACRG, SPEF2, PRLR). Signifcant enrichment results were identifed for fertility and body conformation QTLs within the candidate windows. Gene ontology enrichment analysis including biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components revealed signifcant GO terms associated with male fertility.
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolic Checkpoints in Cancer Cell Cycle
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2014 Metabolic Checkpoints in Cancer Cell Cycle Mahesh Saqcena Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/106 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] METABOLIC CHECKPOINTS IN CANCER CELL CYCLE By Mahesh Saqcena A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Biochemistry in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2014 i 2014 Mahesh Saqcena All Rights Reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Biochemistry in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date Dr. David A. Foster (Chair of Examining Committee) Date Dr. Edward J. Kennelly (Executive Officer) Dr. Mitchell Goldfarb (Hunter College) Dr. Paul Feinstein (Hunter College) Dr. Richard Kolesnick (Sloan Kettering Institute) Dr. Frederick R. Cross (Rockefeller University) (Supervisory Committee) THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract METABOLIC CHECKPOINTS IN CANCER CELL CYCLE by Mahesh Saqcena Advisor: Dr. David A. Foster Growth factors (GFs) as well as nutrient sufficiency regulate cell division in metazoans. The vast majority of mutations that contribute to cancer are in genes that regulate progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. A key regulatory site in G1 is the growth factor-dependent Restriction Point (R), where cells get permissive signals to divide.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Candidates Targeting the ATR–CHK1–WEE1 Axis in Cancer
    cancers Review Clinical Candidates Targeting the ATR–CHK1–WEE1 Axis in Cancer Lukas Gorecki 1 , Martin Andrs 1,2 and Jan Korabecny 1,* 1 Biomedical Research Center, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolska 581, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; [email protected] (L.G.); [email protected] (M.A.) 2 Laboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Videnska 1083, 142 00 Prague, Czech Republic * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +420-495-833-447 Simple Summary: Selective killing of cancer cells is privileged mainstream in cancer treatment and targeted therapy represents the new tool with a potential to pursue this aim. It can also aid to overcome resistance of conventional chemo- or radio-therapy. Common mutations of cancer cells (defective G1 control) favor inhibiting intra-S and G2/M-checkpoints, which are regulated by ATR–CHK1–WEE1 pathway. The ATR–CHK1–WEE1 axis has produced several clinical candidates currently undergoing clinical trials in phase II. Clinical results from randomized trials by ATR and WEE1 inhibitors warrant ongoing clinical trials in phase III. Abstract: Selective killing of cancer cells while sparing healthy ones is the principle of the perfect cancer treatment and the primary aim of many oncologists, molecular biologists, and medicinal chemists. To achieve this goal, it is crucial to understand the molecular mechanisms that distinguish cancer cells from healthy ones. Accordingly, several clinical candidates that use particular mutations in cell-cycle progressions have been developed to kill cancer cells. As the majority of cancer cells have defects in G1 control, targeting the subsequent intra-S or G2/M checkpoints has also been extensively Citation: Gorecki, L.; Andrs, M.; pursued.
    [Show full text]
  • The Involvement of Ubiquitination Machinery in Cell Cycle Regulation and Cancer Progression
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review The Involvement of Ubiquitination Machinery in Cell Cycle Regulation and Cancer Progression Tingting Zou and Zhenghong Lin * School of Life Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The cell cycle is a collection of events by which cellular components such as genetic materials and cytoplasmic components are accurately divided into two daughter cells. The cell cycle transition is primarily driven by the activation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), which activities are regulated by the ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of key regulators such as cyclins, CDK inhibitors (CKIs), other kinases and phosphatases. Thus, the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) plays a pivotal role in the regulation of the cell cycle progression via recognition, interaction, and ubiquitination or deubiquitination of key proteins. The illegitimate degradation of tumor suppressor or abnormally high accumulation of oncoproteins often results in deregulation of cell proliferation, genomic instability, and cancer occurrence. In this review, we demonstrate the diversity and complexity of the regulation of UPS machinery of the cell cycle. A profound understanding of the ubiquitination machinery will provide new insights into the regulation of the cell cycle transition, cancer treatment, and the development of anti-cancer drugs. Keywords: cell cycle regulation; CDKs; cyclins; CKIs; UPS; E3 ubiquitin ligases; Deubiquitinases (DUBs) Citation: Zou, T.; Lin, Z. The Involvement of Ubiquitination Machinery in Cell Cycle Regulation and Cancer Progression. 1. Introduction Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5754. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115754 The cell cycle is a ubiquitous, complex, and highly regulated process that is involved in the sequential events during which a cell duplicates its genetic materials, grows, and di- Academic Editors: Kwang-Hyun Bae vides into two daughter cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Wee1 Rather Than Plk1 Is Inhibited by AZD1775 at Therapeutically Relevant Concentrations
    cancers Article Wee1 Rather Than Plk1 Is Inhibited by AZD1775 at Therapeutically Relevant Concentrations Angela Flavia Serpico 1,2, Giuseppe D’Alterio 1,2, Cinzia Vetrei 1,2, Rosa Della Monica 1, Luca Nardella 1,2, Roberta Visconti 3 and Domenico Grieco 1,4,* 1 CEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate, 80145 Naples, Italy; angelafl[email protected] (A.F.S.); [email protected] (G.D.); [email protected] (C.V.); [email protected] (R.D.M.); [email protected] (L.N.) 2 DMMBM, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy 3 IEOS, CNR, 80131 Naples, Italy; [email protected] 4 Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 24 April 2019; Accepted: 10 June 2019; Published: 13 June 2019 Abstract: Wee1 kinase is an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk)s, crucial cell cycle progression drivers. By phosphorylating cdk1 at tyrosine 15, Wee1 inhibits activation of cyclin B-cdk1 (Cdk1), preventing cells from entering mitosis with incompletely replicated or damaged DNA. Thus, inhibiting Wee1, alone or in combination with DNA damaging agents, can kill cancer cells by mitotic catastrophe, a tumor suppressive response that follows mitosis onset in the presence of under-replicated or damaged DNA. AZD1775, an orally available Wee1 inhibitor, has entered clinical trials for cancer treatment following this strategy, with promising results. Recently, however, AZD1775 has been shown to inhibit also the polo-like kinase homolog Plk1 in vitro, casting doubts on its mechanism of action. Here we asked whether, in the clinically relevant concentration range, AZD1775 inhibited Wee1 or Plk1 in transformed and non-transformed human cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcription of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor a in Leydig Cells Involves Specificity Protein 1 and 3
    125 Transcription of platelet-derived growth factor receptor a in Leydig cells involves specificity protein 1 and 3 Francis Bergeron1, Edward T Bagu1 and Jacques J Tremblay1,2 1Reproduction, Perinatal and Child Health, CHUQ Research Centre, CHUL Room T1-49, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Que´bec, Que´bec, Canada G1V 4G2 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Research in Biology of Reproduction, Universite´ Laval, Que´bec, Que´bec, Canada G1V 0A6 (Correspondence should be addressed to J J Tremblay; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) A is secreted by Sertoli cells and acts on Leydig precursor cells, which express the receptor PDGFRA, triggering their differentiation into steroidogenically active Leydig cells. There is, however, no information regarding the molecular mechanisms that govern Pdgfra expression in Leydig cells. In this study, we isolated and characterized a 2.2 kb fragment of the rat Pdgfra 50-flanking sequence in the TM3 Leydig cell line, which endogenously expresses Pdgfra. A series of 50 progressive deletions of the Pdgfra promoter was generated and transfected in TM3 cells. Using this approach, two regions (K183/K154 and K154/K105), each conferring 46% of Pdgfra promoter activity, were identified. To better define the regulatory elements, trinucleotide mutations spanning the K154/K105 region were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis in the context of the K2.2kb Pdgfra promoter. Mutations that altered the TCCGAGGGAAAC sequence at K138 bp significantly decreased Pdgfra promoter activity in TM3 cells. Several proteins from TM3 nuclear extracts were found to bind to this G(C/A) motif in electromobility shift assay.
    [Show full text]