© the Author(S) 2018 P. Koryś, Poland from Partitions to EU

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

© the Author(S) 2018 P. Koryś, Poland from Partitions to EU Annex Table A.1 Population of Poland (contemporary borders), thousands of people 1810 1825 1843 1857 1868 1890 1910 Prussian part 5091 6451 8083 9353 10,350 12,345 14,158 Russian part 3267 3494 4628 5168 5856 8258 12,205 Austrian part 1158 1416 1646 1853 1968 2300 2690 1931 1960 1970 1986 2000 Prussian part 5757 12,790 14,442 17,029 17,612 (14,567) Russian part 11,706 12,567 13,498 15,722 15,286 Austrian part 3766 4170 4627 5324 5358 Northern and Western territories 8810 (1939) Eastern territories of interwar 12,800 Poland (incorporated by USSR after 1945) Source: Own calculations (Główny Urząd Statystyczny 1993; Wyczański 2003; Gawryszewski 2005) Note: For year 1931, population of Prussian part in borders of Second Republic of Poland (in brackets in contemporary borders, including Northern and Western Territories), population of Northern and Western territories and population of Eastern territories (Kresy) incorporated by USSR after WWII © The Author(s) 2018 365 P. Koryś, Poland From Partitions to EU Accession, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97126-1 366 Annex Table A.2 Urbanization rates (populations of towns 5000+ as a share of total population) 1810 1825 1843 1857 1868 1890 1910 (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Austrian part 4 4 5 6 8 13 19 Russian part 3 5 5 7 12 18 29 Prussian part 6 8 10 12 15 20 29 Poland, contemporary 5 6 7 9 13 18 27 territory 1921 1931 1950 1970 1988 2010 (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Poland, contemporary 21 24 34 49 60 58 territory Source: Own calculations (Karpineć 1932; Jelonek 1967) and various statistical yearbooks of the Republic of Poland Note: For years 1921 and 1931, only the territory of the Second Republic of Poland Table A.3 Population of the largest cities and towns of Polish lands, 1810–1990. Thousands of people 1810 1868 1910 1931 1960 1990 Warszawa 78 Warszawa 255 Warszawa 895 Warszawa 1178 Warszawa 1171 Warszawa 1655 Wrocław 68 Wrocław 208 Wrocław 512 Wrocław 625 Łódź 723 Łódź 852 Wilno 56 Gdańsk 89 Łódź 424 Łódź 605 Kraków 490 Kraków 748 Lwów 44 Lwów 87 Szczecin 236 Lwów 316 Wrocław 443 Wrocław 642 Gdańsk 37 Szczecin 76 Lwów 210 Szczecin 269 Poznań 418 Poznań 589 Kraków 24 Wilno 60 Wilno 205 Poznań 247 Gdańsk 297 Gdańsk 465 Szczecin 21 Poznań 56 Gdańsk 170 Gdańsk 229 Szczecin 279 Szczecin 412 Elbląg 17 Kraków 50 Poznań 157 Kraków 221 Katowice 275 Bydgoszcz 380 Poznań 16 Łódź 36 Kraków 143 Wilno 196 Bydgoszcz 240 Katowice 367 Brzeg 10 Elbląg 31 Sosnowiec 99 Zabrze 130 Zabrze 194 Lublin 350 Świdnica 10 Bydgoszcz 28 Białystok 80 Katowice 127 Lublin 188 Białystok 268 Legnica 9 Legnica 23 Częstochowa 75 Bydgoszcz 118 Bytom 186 Sosnowiec 259 Głogów 8 Płock 22 Chorzów 73 Częstochowa 118 Częstochowa 168 Częstochowa 257 Grudziądz 8 Tarnów 22 Bytom 68 Lublin 113 Gdynia 153 Gdynia 251 Zielona Góra 8 Gorzów 21 Gliwice 67 Gliwice 111 Chorzów 150 Bytom 230 Wlkp. Stargard 8 Lublin 21 Legnica 67 Sosnowiec 109 Gliwice 139 Radom 226 Szczeciński Nysa 8 Chorzów 20 Lublin 65 Bytom 99 Radom 135 Gliwice 222 Przemyśl 7 Nysa 19 Zabrze 63 Białystok 91 Ruda Śląska 135 Kielce 213 Kalisz 7 Głogów 18 Elbląg 59 Chorzów 81 Sosnowiec 134 Zabrze 203 Annex Rawicz 7 Stargard 17 Bydgoszcz 58 Radom 78 Białystok 126 Toruń 200 Szczeciński Source: Own estimations (Karpineć 1932; Jelonek 1967) and various statistical yearbooks Note: In bold towns located in Western and Northern Territories (and Gdańsk). In italicized towns from the eastern territories of the Second Republic of Poland (Kresy). In this table, only contemporary Polish names are used 367 368 Table A.4 Regional shares of GDP (contemporary borders) GDP 1790 1810 1830 1850 1870 1890 1910 1930 1960 1970 1986 2000 Prussian partition 58.2 61.7 65.0 65.4 64.0 59.8 53.6 49.0 40.4 39.2 40.8 43.6 – Of which 35.0 23.4 23.3 24.9 25.5 Annex Western and Nortern territories Austrian partition 12.5 10.5 10.0 8.8 8.2 7.4 6.5 8.0 12.5 14.1 11.7 12.2 Russian partition 29.2 27.9 25.0 25.9 27.8 32.7 39.9 41.0 46.9 46.7 47.5 44.2 Source: Own calculations (Zieliński 1974; Główny Urząd Statystyczny 1989; Bukowski et al. 2018) Note: Calculations for the communist period based on corrected estimations of National Income (Material Product System). Methods of correction, like in Fallenbuchl (1985), Główny Urząd Statystyczny (1989) Table A.5 Regional GDP per capita in Poland (contemporary borders, G-K dollars 2011) GDP 1790 1810 1830 1850 1870 1890 1910 1930 1960 1970 1986 2000 Prussian partition 1625 1727 1931 2237 2644 3358 4479 5832 7621 10,286 13,384 Austrian partition 1359 1289 1358 1492 1787 2234 2882 5534 8547 9434 12,310 Russian partition 1217 1217 1370 1574 2033 2746 3868 6891 9705 12,970 15,633 (Kingdom of Poland) Poland 1431 1491 1687 1954 2348 3006 4065 3879 6253 8613 11,275 14,132 Source: Own calculations (Zieliński 1974; Główny Urząd Statystyczny 1989; Bukowski et al. 2018; Inklaar et al. 2018) Note: See comments for Table A.4. For years 1790–1910 GDP per capita estimations from Bukowski et al. (2018), since 1921 from Inklaar et al. (2018) Annex 369 Table A.6 Occupational structure Russian part 1810 (%) 1830 (%) 1860 (%) 1897 (%) 1921 (%) 1936 (%) I 78 73 74 68 74 52 II 9 9 13 12 17 25 III 13 18 13 20 9 23 Prussian Part 1810 (%) 1867 (%) 1895 (%) 1921 (%) 1936 (%) I 70 X 66 55 68 38 II 13 X 16 26 14 32 III 17 X 18 19 18 29 Austrian part 1810 (%) 1880 (%) 1900 (%) 1921 (%) 1936 (%) I 81 X 80 82 82 64 II 9 X 6 6 7 15 III 10 X 14 12 10 20 Western and Northern Territories 1936 (%) 1950 (%) 1988 (%) I 28 50 23 II 32 25 36 III 40 25 41 1810 1859/1867/ 1895/1897/ 1921 1931 1950 1970 1988 1995 Poland (%) 1869 (%) 1900 (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) I 76 71 64 76 70 57 38 27 28 II 10 13 18 10 13 23 35 36 30 III 14 16 18 14 17 20 27 37 42 Source: Sobieszczański (1860), Załęski (1876, 1901), Grossmann (1925), Tipton (1976), Kociszewski (1999), Szuman (1999) and Koryś and Tymiński (2015) and various statistical yearbooks of Russia, Prussia, Germany, and Austria in the nineteenth century and the Republic of Poland in the twentieth century Note: Year 1810—data for Duchy of Warsaw (Russian, Prussian and Austrian parts). Year 1921 and 1931, see note for Table A.1 in Annex. Territories of partitions included only in the contemporary territory of Poland, cf. Map 11.1 Bibliography Bukowski, M., Koryś, P., Leszczyńska, C., et al. (2018). Urban population and economic development: Urbanization and approximation of GDP per capita in history—The case of the Polish lands in the 19th century. Mimeo. Fallenbuchl, Z. M. (1985). National income statistics for Poland, 1970–1980. Washington, DC: World Bank. Gawryszewski, A. (2005). Ludność Polski w XX wieku. Warszawa: Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania im. Stanisława Leszczyckiego PAN. Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (1989). Dochód narodowy Polski według województw w 1986 r. Warszawa: Zakład Badań Statystyczno-Ekonomicznych Głównego Urzędu Statystycznego i Polskiej Akademii Nauk. Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (1993). Historia Polski w liczbach: ludność, teryto- rium. Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Grossmann, H. (1925). Struktura społeczna i gospodarcza Ksiestwa̧ Warszawskiego na podstawie spisów ludności 1808–1810. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Inklaar, R., de Jong, H., Bolt, J., & van Zanden, J. (2018). Rebasing “Maddison”: New income comparisons and the shape of long-run economic development. Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen. Jelonek, A. (1967). Ludność miast i osiedli typu miejskiego na ziemiach Polski od 1810 do 1960 r. Warszawa: Instytut Geografii Polskiej Akademii Nauk. © The Author(s) 2018 371 P. Koryś, Poland From Partitions to EU Accession, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97126-1 372 Bibliography Karpineć, Ì. (1932). Ilość osad miejskich byłej Galicji i podział ich na miasta i miasteczka. Lwów: asa im. J. Mianowskiego, Instytut Popierania Polskiej Twórczości Naukowej. Kociszewski, J. (1999). Proces integracji gospodarczej ziem zachodnich i północnych z Polską. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej. Koryś, P., & Tymiński, M. (2015). Occupational structure in the Polish territories at the turn of the 20th (1895–1900) century. Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw. Sobieszczański, F. M. (1860). Kalendarz wydawany przez Obserwatoryum Astronomiczne Warszawskie na rok zwyczajny 1861. Warszawa: Obserwatoryum Astronomiczne Warszawskie. Szuman, A. (1999). Przeobrażenia struktury społeczno-zawodowej ludności Polski w XX wieku. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, LXI, 187–202. Tipton, F. B. (1976). Regional variations in the economic development of Germany during the nineteenth century. Wesleyan University Press. Various Statistical Yearbooks of Austria, Prussia, Germany, Russia (until 1918) and Republic of Poland (after 1918). Wyczański, A. (Ed.). (2003). Historia Polski w liczbach. T. 1: Państwo, społeczeństwo. Warszawa: Zakład Wydawnictw Statystycznych. Załęski, W. (1876). Statystyka porównawcza Królestwa Polskiego: ludność i stosunki ekonomiczne. Warszawa: Gebethner i Wolff. Załęski, W. (1901). Królestwo Polskie pod względem statystycznym. Cz. 2: Statystyka zajęć i przemysłu. Warszawa: Sklad Glowny w Ksiegarni Jana Fiszera. Zieliński, M. (1974). Próba określenia rozmiarów dysproporcji międzyregionalnych w stopie życiowej ludności i sposobów ich zmniejszenia. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, 8, 123–134. Index A Annexation of Austria (Anschluss), Abramovitz, Moses, 9 212 Accumulation, 298 Annexation of Czechoslovakia, 212 Acemoglu, Daron, 3, 13 Anti-communist resistance in Agrarian reform, 24, 95, 107, 116, Poland, 268 123, 132, 140, 143, 156, 168, Anti-Jewish measures, 261 177 Anti-Jewish violence, 261, 263 Agricultural output, 306 Anti-Semitism, 162 Agriculture, 138, 140, 240, 241, Apparatus of control and repression, 292, 305 293 Agroindustry, 137, 140, 141 Arciszewski, Tomasz, 256 Akamatsu, Kanamu, 11, 13 Army, 36, 44, 46, 47, 50, 52, 63, 64, Aldcroft, Derek, 2, 4 68, 78, 80–82, 84, 85, 94, 98, Alexander I Romanov, 82, 357 101, 107, 196–200, 209, 222, Alexander II Romanov, 130 230, 238, 240, 255, 257, 259, Amoral familism, 263 261, 262, 268, 269, 272, 273, Amsden, Alice, 9, 13 289, 293, 311, 322 Anglo-Polish Agreement of Mutual Assembly, 120 Assistance (1939), 212 Augustus II Wettin, 43 © The Author(s) 2018 373 P.
Recommended publications
  • Mid-19Th-Century Building Structure Locations in Galicia And
    Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-379 Earth System Preprint. Discussion started: 17 December 2020 Science c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Open Access Open Data Mid-19th-century building structure locations in Galicia and Austrian Silesia under the Habsburg Monarchy Dominik Kaim1, Marcin Szwagrzyk1, Monika Dobosz1, Mateusz Troll1, Krzysztof Ostafin1 1Faculty of Geography and Geology, Institute of Geography and Spatial Management, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 5 7, 30-387 Kraków, Poland Correspondence to: Dominik Kaim ([email protected]) Abstract. We produced a reconstruction of mid-19th-century building structure locations in former Galicia and Austrian Silesia (parts of the Habsburg Monarchy), located in present-day Czechia, Poland and Ukraine and covering more than 80 000 km2. Our reconstruction was based on a homogeneous series of detailed Second Military Survey maps (1:28,800), which were the 10 result of cadastral mapping (1:2,880) generalization. The dataset consists of two kinds of building structures based on the original map legend – residential and outbuildings (mainly farm-related buildings). The dataset’s accuracy was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively using independent data sources and may serve as an important input in studying long-term socio-economic processes and human-environmental interactions or as a valuable reference for continental settlement reconstructions. The dataset is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/md8jp9ny9z.1 (Kaim et al., 2020). 15 1 Introduction Although the human impact on Earth has been ongoing for millennia (Stephens et al., 2019)⁠, it has accelerated since the mid- 19th century with the development of industry, transport infrastructure and land use change (Fischer-Kowalski et al., 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • * * Top Incomes During Wars, Communism and Capitalism: Poland 1892-2015
    WID.world*WORKING*PAPER*SERIES*N°*2017/22* * * Top Incomes during Wars, Communism and Capitalism: Poland 1892-2015 Pawel Bukowski and Filip Novokmet November 2017 ! ! ! Top Incomes during Wars, Communism and Capitalism: Poland 1892-2015 Pawel Bukowski Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics Filip Novokmet Paris School of Economics Abstract. This study presents the history of top incomes in Poland. We document a U- shaped evolution of top income shares from the end of the 19th century until today. The initial high level, during the period of Partitions, was due to the strong concentration of capital income at the top of the distribution. The long-run downward trend in top in- comes was primarily induced by shocks to capital income, from destructions of world wars to changed political and ideological environment. The Great Depression, however, led to a rise in top shares as the richest were less adversely affected than the majority of population consisting of smallholding farmers. The introduction of communism ab- ruptly reduced inequalities by eliminating private capital income and compressing earn- ings. Top incomes stagnated at low levels during the whole communist period. Yet, after the fall of communism, the Polish top incomes experienced a substantial and steady rise and today are at the level of more unequal European countries. While the initial up- ward adjustment during the transition in the 1990s was induced both by the rise of top labour and capital incomes, the strong rise of top income shares in 2000s was driven solely by the increase in top capital incomes, which make the dominant income source at the top.
    [Show full text]
  • WK 55 Ver 28.Indd
    Barbara Werner Główny Specjalista ds. Ogrodów Historycznych Muzeum Łazienki Królewskie TULIPAN Marszałek Józef Piłsudski rośnie i zakwita na 100-lecie odzyskania niepodległości Od końca XVI wieku tulipany, które do Europy zachodniej, do Niderlandów przybyły z Turcji, na dobre zadomowiły się w europejskich ogrodach i nie sposób sobie wyobrazić wiosny bez ich obecności także w Łazienkach Królewskich. Z biegiem czasu z gatunków botanicznych powstała cała gama tysięcy odmian tulipana. Pojawiły się tulipany o różnym kształcie kieli- cha kwiatu, kolorze czy pokroju liści, o zróżnicowanym okresie kwitnienia – od wczesnej do późnej wiosny. Tulipany są obecnie niemalże wszędzie. Są symbolem wio- sny, radości i odradzającej się natury. Prezentują niemal całą gamę kolorów, od białych do prawie czarnych. Są popularne na całym świecie i nierzadko upamiętniają poprzez specjalną „cere- monię chrztu” wybrane wielkie postaci w historii poszczególnych krajów. Nowe odmiany tych niezwykłych, wybranych tulipanów rejestrowane są w Holandii przez Królewskie Powszechne To- warzystwo Uprawy Roślin Cebulowych (Koninklijke Algemeene Vereeniging voor Bloembollencultuur, KAVB) o ponad 150-letniej historii, z siedzibą w Hillegom. Jednym z tych nadzwyczajnych, jedynych tulipanów jest ochrzczony 9 maja tego roku w Teatrze Królewskim w Starej Oranżerii Tulipan „Marszałek Józef Piłsudski”. Jest to tulipan z grupy „Triumph”, o pojedynczym kwiecie, mocnej konstrukcji łodygi i liści. Jego kielich, o specjalnym kolorze karminu połączonego z odcieniem fi oletu i różu, na- wiązuje do kolorystyki elementów munduru Marszałka, czyli do aksamitnych wypustek przy kołnierzu o bardzo zbliżonym kolorze. Ten wytworny w kolorze kwiat ma jeden subtelny element. Na dnie kielicha tulipana, po jego rozkwitnięciu, znaj- dziemy złote wypełnienie, które możemy odczytać jako ukryte AZIENEK KRÓLEWSKICH Ł złote serca Marszałka… Od 9 maja 2018 roku pamięć o Marszałku Józefi e Piłsud- skim będzie trwała także w Ogrodzie Łazienek Królewskich, w rokrocznie zakwitającym wspaniałym, majowym tulipanie Jego Imienia.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Europe EN
    Understanding Europe A portrait of the European Union in 50 pages "The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein." Understanding Europe A portrait of the European Union in 50 pages We did not choose the easy way: Many discussions, different views on the world, Europe, migration during the 4 project meetings led to this product. The unifying band was the ambition to develop a good product and thus contribute to the understanding of Europe and to a successful integration. We are convinced that we can provide teachers with a didactic compilation that does not yet exist. We will endeavour to ensure that the manual is distributed as widely as possible: inside and outside the project. Thanks and appreciation go to the authors Angelika Brechelmacher, Regina Wonisch, Heike Kölln-Prisner and Jan Karadas. The 4 chapters can be found here: History 3 Institutions 13 Democracy 32 Living in Europe 39 All the best! Herbert Depner Vienna, march 2018 The project partners were: - PoleskiOśrodekSztuki, Polen - Hamburger Volkshochschule, Germany - Nevo parudimos, Romania - EU Warehouse, Belgium - Sprachendienst Konstanz, Germany - Bulgarian Development Agency, Bulgaria - Die Wiener Volkshochschulen, Austria coordinating the project Impressum / Legal notice Herausgeber, Medieninhaber: Die Wiener Volkshochschulen GmbH, Lustkandlgasse 50, 1090 Wien Für den Inhalt verantwortlich: Herbert Schweiger, Geschäftsführer; Herbert Depner, Projektmanager Druck: onlineprinters.com Erscheinungsort: ?? 2 History Ideas of European unity before 1945 Large areas of Europe had previously been united by empires built on force, such as the Roman Empire, Byzantine Empire, Frankish Empire, the First French Empire and Nazi Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synthetic Analysis of the Polish Solidarity Movement Stephen W
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 1-1-2011 A Synthetic Analysis of the Polish Solidarity Movement Stephen W. Mays [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Other Political Science Commons, and the Politics and Social Change Commons Recommended Citation Mays, Stephen W., "A Synthetic Analysis of the Polish Solidarity Movement" (2011). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 73. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A SYNTHETIC ANALYSIS OF THE POLISH SOLIDARITY MOVEMENT A thesis submitted to the Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sociology by Stephen W. Mays Approved by Dr. Richard Garnett, Committee Chairman Dr. Marty Laubach Dr. Brian Hoey Marshall University Huntington, West Virginia December 2011 Table Of Contents Page Acknowledgements ................................................................................ iii Abstract .................................................................................................. v Chapter I. Introduction ................................................................................... 1 II. Methodology ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peasant Rebels Under Stalin This Page Intentionally Left Blank Peasant Rebels Under Stalin
    Peasant Rebels under Stalin This page intentionally left blank Peasant Rebels Under Stalin Collectivization and the Culture of Peasant Resistance Lynne Viola OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS New York Oxford Oxford University Press Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok Bogota Buenos Aires Calcutta Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris Sao Paulo Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Copyright © 1996 by Oxford University Press, Inc. First published in 1996 by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 First issued as an Oxford University Press paperback, 1999 Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Viola, Lynne. Peasant rebels under Stalin : collectivization and the culture of peasant resistance / Lynne Viola. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-19-510197-9 ISBN 0-19-513104-5 (pbk.) 1. Collectivization of agriculture—Soviet Union—History. 2. Peasant uprisings—Soviet Union—History. 3. Government, Resistance to—Soviet Union—History. 4. Soviet Union—Economic policy—1928-1932. 5. Soviet Union—Rural conditions. I. Title. HD1492.5.S65V56 1996 338.7'63'0947—dc20 95-49340 135798642 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper You have shot many people You have driven many to jail You have sent many into exile To certain death in the taiga.
    [Show full text]
  • Maria Dernałowicz "Obraz Literatury Polskiej XIX I XX Wieku
    Maria Dernałowicz "Obraz literatury polskiej XIX i XX wieku. Vol. 1-4", red. Kazimierz Wyka, Henryk Markiewicz, Irena Wyczańska, Kraków 1975 : [recenzja] Literary Studies in Poland 5, 189-191 1980 The Informations Les Informations Obraz Literatury Polskiej XIX i XX wieku (The Picture of Polish Literature of the 19th and 20th Century), Series III: Literatura kra­ jowa w okresie romantyzmu 1831 — 1863 (Literature in Poland in the Romantic Period 1831 — 1863), vol. 1: Kraków 1975, vol. 2 —in print, vol. 3 and 4 —in preparation. The development of Polish Romanticism, the trend which had become victorious in Poland before 1830 with such outstanding works as Antoni Malczewski's Maria, Seweryn Goszczyńskie Zamek kaniow­ ski (The Castle of Kaniów) and, above all, with Adam Mickiewicz's poetry, from Ballads and Romances to Konrad Wallenrod, after 1831, after the collapse of the November uprising, took two different cour­ ses: in emigration, where the greatest poets of the epoch, like Mic­ kiewicz and Słowacki, lived, and in the partitioned Poland. Series III of The Picture o f Polish Literature is devoted to that Roman­ ticism which developed in Poland and which, though presently less known than the literature written in the Great Emigration, exerted considerable influence on the spiritual formation of Poles. Included in the Series are both syntheses and portraits of particular writers (analysis of their works, bibliography, anthology of texts), prepared by the best scholars in the field of history of Romanticism. In the main, writers presented in this Series are, with such rare exceptions as Aleksander Fredro, minor artists, to a great extent influenced by the conventions of the pre-November Romanticism.
    [Show full text]
  • From "Russian" to "Polish": Vilna-Wilno 1900-1925
    FROM “RUSSIAN” TO “POLISH”: Vilna-Wilno 1900-1925 Theodore R. Weeks Southern Illinois University at Carbondale The National Council for Eurasian and East European Research 910 17th Street, N.W. Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20006 TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Principal Investigator: Theodore R. Weeks Council Contract Number: 819-06g Date: June 4, 2004 Copyright Information Scholars retain the copyright on works they submit to NCEEER. However, NCEEER possesses the right to duplicate and disseminate such products, in written and electronic form, as follows: (a) for its internal use; (b) to the U.S. Government for its internal use or for dissemination to officials of foreign governments; and (c) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the U.S. government that grants the public access to documents held by the U.S. government. Additionally, NCEEER has a royalty-free license to distribute and disseminate papers submitted under the terms of its agreements to the general public, in furtherance of academic research, scholarship, and the advancement of general knowledge, on a non-profit basis. All papers distributed or disseminated shall bear notice of copyright. Neither NCEEER, nor the U.S. Government, nor any recipient of a Contract product may use it for commercial sale. * The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available by the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended).
    [Show full text]
  • Acta 123.Indd
    SHORT NOTES SHORT NOTES* Acta Poloniae Historica 123, 2021 PL ISSN 0001–6829 GENERAL WORKS1 Jarosław Kłaczkow (ed.), Ewangelicy w regionie kujawsko-pomorskim na przestrzeni wieków [Protestants in the Cuiavian-Pomeranian Region Through the Centuries], Toruń, 2020, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, 512 pp., ills, bibliog., index of personal names This joint publication is the conclusion of many years of research by the authors into the history of Protestantism in the Cuiavian-Pomeranian region – one of the most important territories for the development of Protestantism (both Lutheranism and Calvinism) in the history of the Polish-Lithuanian Com- monwealth – but it also contains a number of new insights and conclusions by the experts involved in its compilation. Signifi cantly, it was published shortly after the quincentenary of the Reformation in Poland. It is an anthology of thirteen articles, prefaced with an introduction by the editor of the volume, Jarosław Kłaczkow. The articles can be described as short, insightful summaries concerning the history of the Protestant communities in various parts of the region and in various periods, from the sixteenth century and the beginning of the Reformation in the early modern age up to the twentieth century. The book is divided into sections on a geographical basis: Cuiavia (diachronic articles by Marek Romaniuk, Tomasz Łaszkiewicz and Tomasz Krzemiński on the Protestant communities in Bydgoszcz, Inowrocław, and Eastern Cuiavia respectively, and a contribution on the history
    [Show full text]
  • 11012411.Pdf
    Alma Mater Studiorum – Università di Bologna DOTTORATO DI RICERCA Cooperazione Internazionale e Politiche per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile International Cooperation and Sustainable Development Policies Ciclo XX Settore/i scientifico disciplinari di afferenza: Storico, politico e sociale SPS/13 DEVELOPMENT DISCOURSE IN ROMANIA: from Socialism to EU Membership Presentata da: Mirela Oprea Coordinatore Dottorato Relatore Prof. Andrea Segrè Prof. Stefano Bianchini Esame finale anno 2009 - 2 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY With their accession to the European Union, twelve new countries - Romania among them - (re)entered the international community of international donors. In the history of development aid this can be seen as a unique event: it is for the first time in history that such a large number of countries become international donors, with such short notice and in such a particular context that sees some scholars announcing the ‘death’ of development. But in spite of what might be claimed regarding the ‘end’ of the development era, development discourse seems to be rather vigorous and in good health: it is able to extert an undeniable force of attraction over the twelve countries that, in a matter of years, have already convinced themselves of its validity and adhered to its main tenets. This thesis collects evidence for improving our understanding of this process that sees the co-optation of twelve new countries to the dominant theory and practice of development cooperation. The evidence collected seems to show that one of the tools employed by the promoters of this co-optation process is that of constructing the ‘new’ Member States as ‘new’, inexpert donors that need to learn from the ‘old’ ones.
    [Show full text]
  • GIPE-011178-Contents.Pdf (1.212Mb)
    -Poland T.HE .MODERN WORLD A SURVEY OF HISTORICAL FORCES Edited by Rt. Hon. H. A. L. Fisher, f.R.S. ~ The aim of the volumes in this series is to provide a balanced survey, With such historical illustrations as are necessary, of the tendencies and forces, political, economic, intellectual, which are moulding tpe lives of COD:.temporary states. Alrea~y Published t ARABIA by .H. St. J. Philby AUSTRALIA by Professor W. K. Hancock CANADA by Professor Alexander ;Br~dy EGYPT by George Young ENGLAND by Dean lnge FRANCE by Sisley Huddleston G:J;:RMANY by G. P. Gooch .GREECE by W. Miller · · . I"NDIA by.Sit .Valentine Chirol. · IRELAND by Stephen Gwynn · ITALY by Luigi Villari JAPAN by I. Nitobe NORWAY by Gathorne Hardy PERSIA by Sir Arnold T. Wilson POLAND by Professor Roman Dyboski ·RUSSIA by N. Makeev and V. O'Hara SOUTH AFRICA by Jan H. ~Hofmeyr ·~ SPAIN by S. de Madariaga . TURKEY by Arnold Toynbee and. K. P. Kirkwood In Preparation : HUNGARY by C. A. Macartney 'JUGO-SLAVIA by Dr. R. W. Seton-Watson NEW ZEALAND by Dr. \V. P. Morrell scoTLAND by-Dr. R. S. Rait and G. Pryde u.s.A. by S. K. Ratcliffe POLAND- . By ROMAN DYBOSKI ' Ph.D., Professor of English Literature in lhe University of Cracow With t1 Forewortl by H. A. L •. -FISHER P.C., D.C.L. London Ernest Benn Limited I 9 3 3 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN POLAND TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FoREWORD 9 AUTHORS PREFACE. ,,.. II •. I. THE OLD PoLAND .. IS 1. The unique fate of Poland.-z.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Independence Regained
    1 INDEPENDENCE REGAINED The history of Poland in the modern era has been characterised by salient vicissitudes: outstanding victories and tragic defeats, soaring optimism and the deepest despair, heroic sacrifice and craven subser- vience. Underpinning all of these experiences and emotions, however, are the interrelated themes of national freedom, independence and sovereignty, which were sometimes lost, then regained, but never forgotten or abandoned. They, more than anything else, shaped Poland’s destiny in the modern era. And if there is one single, fundamental point of reference, then it is unquestionably the Partitions of the eighteenth century which resulted in Poland’s disappearance from the map of Europe for well over a century. The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, as the Polish State was consti- tuted since the mid-sixteenth century, was for the next two hundred years one of the largest and most powerful in Europe, occupying a huge swathe of territory stretching from the area around Poznań in the west to far-off Muscovy in the east, and from Livonia in the north to the edge of the Ottoman Empire in the south. Famous kings, such as Stefan Batory (1575–86) and Jan Sobieski III (1674–96), and great landowning families, the Lubomirskis, Radziwiłłs, Zamoyskis, Czartoryskis and the like, played a leading role in moulding the economic, political and social life of the country and bringing it unprecedented international prestige. By the beginning of the eighteenth century, however, the first unmistakable signs of decline appeared, and were accentuated by the emergence of ambitious and expansionist neighbours in Russia, Prussia and Austria.
    [Show full text]