DOCSLIB.ORG

Parasites of Fishes in South Dakota E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parasites of Fishes in South Dakota E South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange South Dakota State University Agricultural Bulletins Experiment Station 7-1-1959 Parasites of Fishes in South Dakota E. J. Hugghins Follow this and additional works at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/agexperimentsta_bulletins Recommended Citation Hugghins, E. J., "Parasites of Fishes in South Dakota" (1959). Bulletins. Paper 484. http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/agexperimentsta_bulletins/484 This Bulletin is brought to you for free and open access by the South Dakota State University Agricultural Experiment Station at Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletins by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BULLETIN 484 JULY 1959 Contents Introductory and Background Information -------------------------------------------�--- 5 D efiniti o ns ________________ ----------------------------------______ ________ ________________ __ ____ _____ _______ __ 5 Classifi ca ti on ____ __ ____ __________________ __________________ ______ ______ __________________________ ______ ______ 7 Key for Identification ----------------------------------------------------------------------------_____ 7 Simplified Key to Major Groups of Fish Parasites__________________________________ 7 Life Cycles in General -------------------------------------------------------------------------------____ 8 Flukes (Trematodes) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 Tapeworms ( Cestodes ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 I!' Roundworms (Nematodes) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 Spiny-headed Worms ( Acanthocephalans) -------------------------------------------- 17 Leeches (Annelids) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 Fish Lice ( Parasitic Copepods) -------------------------------------------------------------- 19 Fish Parasites Found in South Dakota ------------------------------------------------------- 20 Phylum Platyhelminthes (flatworms) Class Trematoda (flukes) -------------------------------------------------------------------- 27 Order Mono genea -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ___ 27 Order Digenea ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 27 Family Diplostomidae ( Strigeida) ---------------------------------------------- 28 Family Clinostomidae -------------------------------------------------------------------- 31 Family Gorgoderidae ---------------------------------------------------------___________ 34 Family Heterophyidae ________________________------------------------------- ----------- 34 Family Lis sorchii dae ------------------------------------------________________ _ ___________ 35 Class Cestoidea, Subclass Cestoda (tapeworms) ------------------------------ 35 Order C aryoph y llidea ------------------------------------------------________________________ 35 Family Caryophy llaeidae ------------------------------------------------------ ________ 38 Order Pseudophyllidea ------------------------------------------------------------- ________ 38 Family B othriocephalidae ------------------------------------------__________________ 38 Family Amphycoty lidae ---------------------------------------------------------------- 39 Family Dibothriocephalidae ____________ ____________________________________ ________ 39 Order Proteocephala ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ___ 40 Family Proteocephalidae -------------------------------------------------------------- 40 Phylum Aschelminthes Class Nematoda (roundworms) ---------------------------------------------------------- 43 Family As caridae _______________________ --------------------------------- ________________ ___ 44 Family Camallanidae -------------------------------------------------------------------- 44 Family Philometriidae ----------------------------------------------____________________ 44 Phylum Acanthocephala ( spiny-headed worms) ----------------------------------- 46 Family Pomphorhynchidae ---------------------------------------------------------- 46 Family N eoechinor hynchidae ------------------------------------------------------ 47 Family Gorgo rh ynchida e ____ ______ ______ ______ __________________ _ _____ ____ _ ______ _ ___ 4 7 Phylum Annelida (segmented worms) -------------------------------------------------- 47 Class Hirudinea (leeches) -------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 7 Family Piscicolidae ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4 7 1 Phylum Arthropoda ( jointed-footed animals) -------------------------------------- 48 Class Crustacea, Subclass Copepoda -------------------------------------------------- 48 Order Branchiura Family Argulidae ( fish lice) -------------------------------------------------------- 48 Order Eucopepoda Family Lemaeidae ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 50 Family Lernaeopodidae --------------------------------------------------______________ 51 Other Dise ases ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 52 Lymphocys tis ______________________________________________ -------------------------__________ ___ _ _____ 5 2 Water Mold -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 52 Tumors ________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------_____________ ________ 53 Effectsof Parasites on Fishes -------------------------------------------------------------------,---- 54 Flukes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 54 Tapeworms -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 56 Other Parasitic Worms -------------------------------------------------------------------___________ 57 Fish Lice ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 58 Importance of Fish Parasites to Man ---------------------------------------------------------- 58 Fish Parasites Which Can Develop in Man -------------------------------------------- 58 Importance Commercially and Aesthetically ---------------------------------------- 59 Control of Fish Parasites ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 61 Aids, Towards Use of Literature on Fish Parasites ------------------------------------ 63 Indexing and Abstracting Services ---------------------------------------------------------- 63 Survey Type Studies ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 63 Reference Boo ks __ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 64 Manuals on Technique ------------------------------------------------------------__________________ 64 References Cited -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 64 Index _______ --------------------------------_ ____________ ___ __ ______________________ ___ ______________ ____________ ____ 69 ILLUSTRATIONS Fig. 1 Life cycle chart of a strigeid fluke, I-Iysteromorpha triloba ___ ____ 9 Fig. 2 Life cycle chart of a pseuodophyllidean tapeworm, Diphyllo­ bothrium oblongatum ------------------------------------------------------------------ 12 Fig. 3 Life cycle chart of Proteocephalus pinguis, a tapeworm of north em pike ____________________________ --------------------------------__ ________ __ ________ 13 Fig. 4 Life cycle chart of the bass tapeworm, Proteocephalusambloplitis 14 Fig. 5 Life cycle chart of a fish "guinea worm," Philometra nodulosa 16 Fig. 6 Life cycle chart of a roundworm, C ontracaecum spiculigerum 17 Fig. 7 Life cycle chart of a spiny-headed worm, Leptorhynchoides the cat us ________________ _ _____ _____ ____ ___ __________ ______ _ _______ _ ______ __________________ __ __ __ 18 Fig. 8 Liver of bluegill packed with "white grubs," Posthodiplosto- mum minimum ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 28 Fig. 9 Enlarged view of "white grub"________________________________________________________ 28 Fig. 10 Life cycle chart of Posthodiplostomum minimum ________________________ 29 Fig. 11 Bullhead heavily infected with metacercariae of I-Iystero- morpha triloba ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 30 2 Fig. 12 Microphotograph of sectioned bullhead muscle containing H. trilo ha ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 31 Fig. 13 Minnow infected with "black grubs"______________________________________________ 31 Fig. 14 Life cycle chart of a "black grub," Uvidifer ambloplitus ____________ 32 Fig. 15 Life cycle chart of "yellow grub," Clinostomurri:marginatum______ 33 Fig. 16 View of C. marginatum to show distinctive intestine_ _________________ 34 Fig. 17 Phyllodistomum staffordi,a flukefrom the urinary bladder of bullheads ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Culturing Parasites, Establishing Infections and Assessing Immune Responses in the Three-Spined Stickleback
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Hook, Line and Infection: A Guide to Culturing Parasites, Establishing Infections and Assessing Immune Responses in the Three-Spined Stickleback Alexander Stewart*, Joseph Jacksonx, Iain Barber{, Christophe Eizaguirrejj, Rachel Paterson*, Pieter van West#, Chris Williams** and Joanne Cable*,1 *Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom x University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom { University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom jj Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom #Institute of Medical Sciences, Aberdeen, United Kingdom **National Fisheries Service, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom 1Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Stickleback Husbandry 7 2.1 Ethics 7 2.2 Collection 7 2.3 Maintenance 9 2.4 Breeding sticklebacks in vivo and in vitro 10 2.5 Hatchery 15 3. Common Stickleback Parasite Cultures 16 3.1 Argulus foliaceus 17 3.1.1 Introduction 17 3.1.2 Source, culture and infection 18 3.1.3 Immunology 22 3.2 Camallanus lacustris 22 3.2.1 Introduction 22 3.2.2 Source, culture and infection 23 3.2.3 Immunology 25 3.3 Diplostomum Species 26 3.3.1 Introduction 26 3.3.2 Source, culture and infection 27 3.3.3 Immunology 28 Advances in Parasitology, Volume 98 ISSN 0065-308X © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2017.07.001 All rights reserved. 1 j ARTICLE IN PRESS 2 Alexander Stewart et al. 3.4 Glugea anomala 30 3.4.1 Introduction 30 3.4.2 Source, culture and infection 30 3.4.3 Immunology 31 3.5 Gyrodactylus Species 31 3.5.1 Introduction 31 3.5.2 Source, culture and infection 32 3.5.3 Immunology 34 3.6 Saprolegnia parasitica 35 3.6.1 Introduction 35 3.6.2 Source, culture and infection 36 3.6.3 Immunology 37 3.7 Schistocephalus solidus 38 3.7.1 Introduction 38 3.7.2 Source, culture and infection 39 3.7.3 Immunology 43 4.
    [Show full text]
  • STUDY on “FISH Mums Or LAKE MANITGU, MICHIGAN 9 .. F "
    rwsés' - ' . on... .09”.~. ‘09”- . ‘ . '.'.'.'-'-’ .°.‘/ ch'.‘ o'c’ - o to. o a u ' 0-0~.. 3‘. OI .' .‘? - ' ..‘_.‘ ..'. .‘ - STUDY ON “FISH Mums or LAKE MANITGU, MICHIGAN 9 .. f " “ff."‘h‘ WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE- TO INFESTATION op. - ' "1-1? SMALLMOUTH ”BASS, BY THE; BASS TAPEWORM, "1' PROTEIOCEW. AMBLOPLITIS (LEIbY‘). f Thesis for the Degree of M. S. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Pram Shankar Prasad 1963 ~“- w IIUL 1.1 3 8 02 2832 )\ ‘II Lh" Us F' ABSTRACT STUDY ON FISH PARASITE OF LAKE MANITOU, MICHIGAN WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO INFESTATION OF SMALLMOUTH BASS BY THE BASS TAPEWORM, PROTEOCEPHALUS AMBLOPLITIS (LEIDY) by Prem Shankar Prasad This is a report of an investigation of the degree of infestation of smallmouth bass of Lake Manitou, Michigan, by the bass tapeworm, Proteocephalus amblgplitis, and the extent of host tissue damage. A sample of 42 fishes was examined in this study Which was represented by 36 small- mouth bass, five yellow perch, and one green sunfish. Al- together, nine different species of helminth parasites from the three phyla were recovered. The larval stage of the bass tapeworm (plerocercoids) were present in all the 42 fishes examined and were found to be most damaging. The extent of damage is greater in the females than in the males of the same age group. A study on larval lengths revealed that gonads, especially the ovaries, are better suited for the growth of these larvae. As the fish advance in age the larvae in the gonads also increase in length. The rate of growth of larvae is approximately three times greater in Prem Shankar Prasad the females than in the males.
    [Show full text]
  • And Wildlife, 1928-72
    Bibliography of Research Publications of the U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 1928-72 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF SPORT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE RESOURCE PUBLICATION 120 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS OF THE U.S. BUREAU OF SPORT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE, 1928-72 Edited by Paul H. Eschmeyer, Division of Fishery Research Van T. Harris, Division of Wildlife Research Resource Publication 120 Published by the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife Washington, B.C. 1974 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Eschmeyer, Paul Henry, 1916 Bibliography of research publications of the U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 1928-72. (Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Kesource publication 120) Supt. of Docs. no.: 1.49.66:120 1. Fishes Bibliography. 2. Game and game-birds Bibliography. 3. Fish-culture Bibliography. 4. Fishery management Bibliogra­ phy. 5. Wildlife management Bibliography. I. Harris, Van Thomas, 1915- joint author. II. United States. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. III. Title. IV. Series: United States Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Resource publication 120. S914.A3 no. 120 [Z7996.F5] 639'.9'08s [016.639*9] 74-8411 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing OfTie Washington, D.C. Price $2.30 Stock Number 2410-00366 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS OF THE U.S. BUREAU OF SPORT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE, 1928-72 INTRODUCTION This bibliography comprises publications in fishery and wildlife research au­ thored or coauthored by research scientists of the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife and certain predecessor agencies. Separate lists, arranged alphabetically by author, are given for each of 17 fishery research and 6 wildlife research labora­ tories, stations, investigations, or centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Luth Wfu 0248D 10922.Pdf
    SCALE-DEPENDENT VARIATION IN MOLECULAR AND ECOLOGICAL PATTERNS OF INFECTION FOR ENDOHELMINTHS FROM CENTRARCHID FISHES BY KYLE E. LUTH A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY GRADAUTE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Biology May 2016 Winston-Salem, North Carolina Approved By: Gerald W. Esch, Ph.D., Advisor Michael V. K. Sukhdeo, Ph.D., Chair T. Michael Anderson, Ph.D. Herman E. Eure, Ph.D. Erik C. Johnson, Ph.D. Clifford W. Zeyl, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my PI, Dr. Gerald Esch, for all of the insight, all of the discussions, all of the critiques (not criticisms) of my works, and for the rides to campus when the North Carolina weather decided to drop rain on my stubborn head. The numerous lively debates, exchanges of ideas, voicing of opinions (whether solicited or not), and unerring support, even in the face of my somewhat atypical balance of service work and dissertation work, will not soon be forgotten. I would also like to acknowledge and thank the former Master, and now Doctor, Michael Zimmermann; friend, lab mate, and collecting trip shotgun rider extraordinaire. Although his need of SPF 100 sunscreen often put our collecting trips over budget, I could not have asked for a more enjoyable, easy-going, and hard-working person to spend nearly 2 months and 25,000 miles of fishing filled days and raccoon, gnat, and entrail-filled nights. You are a welcome camping guest any time, especially if you do as good of a job attracting scorpions and ants to yourself (and away from me) as you did on our trips.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Curriculum Vitae Stephen S. Curran, Ph.D. Department of Coastal
    Curriculum vitae Stephen S. Curran, Ph.D. Department of Coastal Sciences The University of Southern Mississippi Gulf Coast Research Laboratory 703 East Beach Drive Phone: (228) 238-0208 Ocean Springs, MS 39564 Email: [email protected] Research and Teaching Interests: I am an organismal biologist interested in the biodiversity of metazoan parasitic animals. I study their taxonomy using traditional microscopic and histological techniques and their genetic interrelationships and systematics using ribosomal DNA sequences. I also investigate the effects of extrinsic factors on aquatic environments by using parasite prevalence and abundance as a proxy for total biodiversity in aquatic communities and for assessing food web dynamics. I am also interested in the epidemiology of viral diseases of crustaceans. University Teaching Experience: •Instructor for Parasites of Marine Animals Summer class, University of Southern Mississippi, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory (2011-present). •Co-Instructor (with Richard Heard) for Marine Invertebrate Zoology, University of Southern Mississippi, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory (2007). •Intern Mentor, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory. I’ve instructed 16 interns during (2003, 2007- present). •Graduate Teaching Assistant for Animal Parasitology, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut (Spring 1995). •Graduate Teaching Assistant for Introductory Biology for Majors, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut (Fall 1994). Positions: •Assistant Research
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus Idus
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1822280 REVIEW Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus idus Mehis Rohtlaa,b, Lorenzo Vilizzic, Vladimır Kovacd, David Almeidae, Bernice Brewsterf, J. Robert Brittong, Łukasz Głowackic, Michael J. Godardh,i, Ruth Kirkf, Sarah Nienhuisj, Karin H. Olssonh,k, Jan Simonsenl, Michał E. Skora m, Saulius Stakenas_ n, Ali Serhan Tarkanc,o, Nildeniz Topo, Hugo Verreyckenp, Grzegorz ZieRbac, and Gordon H. Coppc,h,q aEstonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; bInstitute of Marine Research, Austevoll Research Station, Storebø, Norway; cDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Łod z, Poland; dDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia; eDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, USP-CEU University, Madrid, Spain; fMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, UK; gDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK; hCentre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK; iAECOM, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada; jOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada; kDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University and Inter-University Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat, Tel Aviv,
    [Show full text]
  • (Digenea: Diplostomidae) from the Catfish Clarias Gariepinus (Clariidae) in Freshwater Habitats of Tanzania
    Journal of Helminthology, page 1 of 7 doi:10.1017/S0022149X15001005 q Cambridge University Press 2015 The nervous systems of Tylodelphys metacercariae (Digenea: Diplostomidae) from the catfish Clarias gariepinus (Clariidae) in freshwater habitats of Tanzania F.D. Chibwana* and G. Nkwengulila Department of Zoology and Wildlife Conservation, University of Dar es Salaam, PO Box 35064, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Received 29 July 2015; Accepted 27 October 2015) Abstract The nervous systems of three Tylodelphys metacercariae (T. mashonense, Tylodelphys spp. 1 and 2) co-occurring in the cranial cavity of the catfish, Clarias gariepinus, were examined by the activity of acetylthiocholine iodide (AcThI), with the aim of better understanding the arrangement of sensillae on the body surface and the nerve trunks and commissures, for taxonomic purposes. Enzyme cytochemistry demonstrated a comparable orthogonal arrangement in the three metacercariae: the central nervous system (CNS) consisting of a pair of cerebral ganglia, from which anterior and posterior neuronal pathways arise and inter- link by cross-connectives and commissures. However, the number of transverse nerves was significantly different in the three diplostomid metacercariae: Tylodelphys sp. 1 (30), Tylodelphys sp. 2 (21) and T. mashonense (15). The observed difference in the nervous system of the three metacercariae clearly separates them into three species. These findings suggest that consistent differences in the transverse nerves of digenean metacercariae could enable the differentiation
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Parasite Assemblages in Fish Hosts Is Presented
    Bio-Research, 7(2): 561 – 570 561 Parasite Assemblages in Fish Hosts 1Iyaji, F. O., 2Etim. L. and 1Eyo, J. E. 1Department of Zoology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria 2Department of Fisheries, University of Uyo, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria Corresponding Author: Iyaji, F. O. Department of Zoology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Email: [email protected] Abstract A review of various factors affecting parasite assemblages in fish hosts is presented. These factors are broadly divided into two: Biotic and abiotic factors. Biotic factors such as host age and size, host size and parasites size, host specificity, host diet and host sex and their influence on the abundance and distribution of parasites are considered and highlighted. Equally, seasonality and other environmental factors that may facilitate the establishment and proliferations of parasites in host populations are also highlighted. Keywords: Parasite, Factors, Assemblages, Fish hosts Introduction Results and Discussion There are numerous biotic and abiotic factors that affect parasite assemblages (Bauer, 1959; Esch, Host age and size: Generally, standard length of 1982; Kennedy, 1995). The term assemblages is fish is directly related to age (Shotter, 1973) and used here to refer to all microhabitat, in fish body size. Age has often been found to be (gastrointestinal) or on (external surfaces) the fish positively associated with the prevalence and/or hosts (Poulin, 2004). These factors include the intensity of parasitic infection (Betterton, 1974; following: physiological condition of the fish host, Madhavi and Rukmini, 1991; Chandler et al., 1995) host diet, host size, evolutionary history and (Table 1). Poulin (2000) stated that in fish environmental factors, such as season of the year, population, parasitic infection tends to increase with size and type of water body, altitude, temperature, increasing host age and size.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinostomum Album N. Sp. and Clinostomum Marginatum (Rudolphi, 1819), Parasites of the Great Egret Ardea Alba L
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Publications Health Inspection Service 2017 Clinostomum album n. sp. and Clinostomum marginatum (Rudolphi, 1819), parasites of the great egret Ardea alba L. from Mississippi, USA Thomas G. Rosser Mississippi State University Neely R. Alberson Mississippi State University Ethan T. Woodyard Mississippi State University Fred L. Cunningham USDA/APHIS/WS National Wildlife Research Center, [email protected] Linda M. Pote Mississippi State University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc Part of the Life Sciences Commons Rosser, Thomas G.; Alberson, Neely R.; Woodyard, Ethan T.; Cunningham, Fred L.; Pote, Linda M.; and Griffin,a M tt .,J "Clinostomum album n. sp. and Clinostomum marginatum (Rudolphi, 1819), parasites of the great egret Ardea alba L. from Mississippi, USA" (2017). USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications. 1930. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/1930 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff ubP lications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Thomas G. Rosser, Neely R. Alberson, Ethan T. Woodyard, Fred L. Cunningham, Linda M. Pote, and Matt .J Griffin This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/ 1930 Syst Parasitol (2017) 94:35–49 DOI 10.1007/s11230-016-9686-0 Clinostomum album n.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Report for the Sharpnose Shiner (Notropis Oxyrhynchus) and Smalleye Shiner (N
    Species Status Assessment Report For the Sharpnose Shiner (Notropis oxyrhynchus) And Smalleye Shiner (N. buccula) Prepared by the Arlington, Texas Ecological Services Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date of last revision: June 10, 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This species status assessment reports the results of the comprehensive status review for the sharpnose shiner (Notropis oxyrhynchus) and smalleye shiner (N. buccula) and provides a thorough account of the species’ overall viability and, conversely, extinction risk. Sharpnose and smalleye shiners are small minnows currently restricted to the contiguous river segments of the upper Brazos River basin in north-central Texas. In conducting our status assessment we first considered what the two shiners need to ensure viability. We generally define viability as the ability of the species to persist over the long term and, conversely, to avoid extinction. We then evaluated whether those needs currently exist and the repercussions to the species when those needs are missing, diminished, or inaccessible. We next consider the factors that are causing the species to lack what it needs, included historical, current, and future factors. Finally, considering the information reviewed, we evaluated the current status and future viability of the species in terms of resiliency, redundancy, and representation. Resiliency is the ability of the species to withstand stochastic events and, in the case of the shiners, is best measured by the extent of suitable habitat in terms of stream length. Redundancy is the ability of a species to withstand catastrophic events by spreading the risk and can be measured through the duplication and distribution of resilient populations across its range.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 1 Classified List of Fishes Mentioned in the Text, with Scientific and Common Names
    APPENDIX 1 Classified list of fishes mentioned in the text, with scientific and common names. ___________________________________________________________ Scientific names and classification are from Nelson (1994). Families are listed in the same order as in Nelson (1994), with species names following in alphabetical order. The common names of British fishes mostly follow Wheeler (1978). Common names of foreign fishes are taken from Froese & Pauly (2002). Species in square brackets are referred to in the text but are not found in British waters. Fishes restricted to fresh water are shown in bold type. Fishes ranging from fresh water through brackish water to the sea are underlined; this category includes diadromous fishes that regularly migrate between marine and freshwater environments, spawning either in the sea (catadromous fishes) or in fresh water (anadromous fishes). Not indicated are marine or freshwater fishes that occasionally venture into brackish water. Superclass Agnatha (jawless fishes) Class Myxini (hagfishes)1 Order Myxiniformes Family Myxinidae Myxine glutinosa, hagfish Class Cephalaspidomorphi (lampreys)1 Order Petromyzontiformes Family Petromyzontidae [Ichthyomyzon bdellium, Ohio lamprey] Lampetra fluviatilis, lampern, river lamprey Lampetra planeri, brook lamprey [Lampetra tridentata, Pacific lamprey] Lethenteron camtschaticum, Arctic lamprey] [Lethenteron zanandreai, Po brook lamprey] Petromyzon marinus, lamprey Superclass Gnathostomata (fishes with jaws) Grade Chondrichthiomorphi Class Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Native and Non-Native Fishes in the Little Colorado River
    1 Parasites of native and non-native fishes of the Little Colorado River, Grand Canyon, Arizona. Anindo Choudhury1, Timothy L. Hoffnagle2, and Rebecca A. Cole USGS-National Wildlife Health Center, 6006 Schroeder Road, Madison, WI 53711, U.S.A. 2Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 211 Inlow Hall, Eastern Oregon University, La Grande, OR 97850 Corresponding author: Rebecca Cole, USGS – National Wildlife Health Center, 6006 Schroeder Road, Madison, Wisconsin 53711, U.S.A. Phone: (608) 270 2468. E-mail: [email protected]. 1Current address: Division of Natural Sciences, St. Norbert College, 100 Grant Street, DePere, Wisconsin 54115, U.S.A. Running Head: Fish parasites in the Little Colorado River. 2 ABSTRACT: A 2-year, seasonal, parasitological study of 1435 fish, belonging to 4 species of native fishes and 7 species of non-native fishes from the lower Little Colorado River (LCR) and tributary creeks, Grand Canyon, Arizona, yielded 17 (possibly 18) species of parasites. These comprised 1 myxozoan (Henneguya exilis), 2 copepods (Ergasilus arthrosis and Lernaea cyprinacea), 1 acarine (Oribatida gen. sp.), 1 piscicolid leech (Myzobdella lugubris), 3 (possibly 4) monogeneans ( Gyrodactylus hoffmani, Gyrodactylus sp., Dactylogyrus extensus, and Ligictaluridus floridanus), 4 nematodes (Contracacecum sp., Eustrongylides sp. Rhabdochona sp., Truttaedacnitis truttae), 3 cestodes (Bothriocephalus acheilognathi, Corallobothrium fimbriatum and Megathylacoides giganteum), and 2 trematodes (Ornithodiplostomum sp., Posthodiplostomum sp.). Of these, Rhabdochona sp. is the only adult parasite native to the LCR. Infection intensities (worm burden) of Ornithodiplostomum sp and B. acheilognathi were positively correlated with length of humpback chub, Gila cypha. Adult helminths showed a high degree of host specificity, the exception being B.
    [Show full text]