DOCSLIB.ORG

TCRP Report 12: Guidelines for Transit Facility Signing and Graphics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TCRP Report 12: Guidelines for Transit Facility Signing and Graphics T RANSIT C OOPERATIVE R ESEARCH P ROGRAM SPONSORED BY The Federal Transit Administration TCRP Report 12 Guidelines for Transit Facility Signing and Graphics Transportation Research Board National Research Council TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1996 SELECTION COMMITTEE CHAIR ROD J. DIRIDON OFFICERS Int'l Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Study Chair: James W. VAN Loben Sels, Director, California Department of Transportation Vice Chair: David N. Wormley, Dean of Engineering, Pennsylvania State University MEMBERS Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board SHARON D. BANKS AC Transit LEE BARNES MEMBERS Barwood, Inc. GERALD L. BLAIR Indiana County Transit Authority EDWARD H. ARNOLD, Chair and President, Arnold Industries, Lebanon, PA MICHAEL BOLTON SHARON D. BANKS, General Manger, AC Transit, Oakland, CA Capital Metro BRIAN J. L. BERRY, Lloyd Viel Berkner Regental Professor & Chair, Bruton Center for Development Studies, SHIRLEY A. DeLIBERO University of Texas at Dallas New Jersey Transit Corporation LILLIAN C. BORRONE, Director, Port Commerce, The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Past Chair, SANDRA DRAGGOO 1995) CATA DWIGHT M. BOWER, Director, Idaho Department of Transportation LOUIS J. GAMBACCINI JOHN E. BREEN, The Nasser I. Al-Rashid Chair in Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin SEPTA WILLIAM F. BUNDY, Director, Rhode Island Department of Transportation DELON HAMPTON DAVID BURWELL, President, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, Washington, DC Delon Hampton & Associates E. DEAN CARLSON, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation RICHARD R. KELLY RAY W. CLOUGH, Nishkian Professor of Structural Engineering, Emeritus, University of California, Berkeley Port Authority Trans-Houston Corp. JAMES C. DELONG, Director of Aviation, Denver International Airport, Denver, Colorado ALAN F. KIEPPER JAMES N. DENN, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Transportation New York City Transit Authority DENNIS J. FITZGERALD, Executive Director, Capital District Transportation Authority, Albany, NY EDWARD N. KRAVITZ DAVID R. GOODE, Chair, President and CEO, Norfolk Southern Corporation The Flxible Corporation DELON HAMPTON, Chair and CEO, Delon Hampton & Associates PAUL LARROUSSE LESTER A. HOEL, Hamilton Professor, Civil Engineering, University of Virginia Madison Metro Transit System JAMES L. LAMMIE, Director, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., New York, NY ROBERT G. LINGWOOD ROBERT E. MARTINEZ, Secretary, Virginia Department of Transportation BC Transit CHARLES P. O'LEARY, JR., Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Transportation GORDON J. LINTON CRAIG E. PHILIP, President, Ingram Barge Co., Nashville, TN FTA WAYNE SHACKELFORD, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Transportation WILLIAM W. MILLAR LESLIE STERMAN, Executive Director, East-West Gateway Coordinating Council, St. Louis, MO Port Authority of Allegheny County JOSEPH M. SUSSMAN, JR East Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering, MIT MIKE MOBEY MARTIN WACHS, Director, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Los Angeles Isabella County Transportation Comm. DON S. MONROE Pierce Transit PATRICIA S. NETTLESHIP EX OFFICIO MEMBERS The Nettleship Group, Inc. ROBERT E. PAASWELL The City College of New York MIKE ACOTT, President, National Asphalt Pavement Association JAMES P. REICHERT ROY A. ALLEN, Vice President, Research and Test Department, Association of American Railroads Reichert Management Services ANDREW H. CARD, JR., President and CEO, American Automobile Manufacturers Association LAWRENCE G. REUTER THOMAS J. DONOHUE, President and CEO, American Trucking Associations WMATA FRANCIS B. FRANCOIS, Executive Director, American Association of State Highway and Transportation MICHAEL S. TOWNES Officials Peninsula Transportation Dist. Comm. DAVID GARDINER, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FRANK J. WILSON JACK R. GILSTRAP, Executive Vice President, American Public Transit Association New Jersey DOT ALBERT J. HERBERGER, Maritime Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation EDWARD WYTKIND DAVID R. HINSON, Federal Aviation Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation AFL-CIO T. R. LAKSHMANAN, Director, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation GORDON J. LINTON, Federal Transit Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation EX OFFICIO MEMBERS RICARDO MARTINEZ, National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation GORDON J. LINTON JOLENE M. MOLITORIS, Federal Railroad Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation FTA DHARMENDRA K. (DAVE) SHARMA, Research and Special Programs Administrator, U.S. Department of JACK R. GILSTRAP Transportation APTA RODNEY E. SLATER, Federal Highway Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation RODNEY E. SLATER ARTHUR E. WILLIAMS, Chief of Engineers and Commander, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers FHWA FRANCIS B. FRANCOIS AASHTO TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR. TRB Transportation Research Board Executive Committee Subcommittee for TCRP TDC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS, California Department of Transportation (Chair) FRANK J. CIHAK DENNIS J. FITZGERALD, Captil Dist. Transportation Authority, Albany, NY APTA LILLIAN C. BORRONE, The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Chair) LESTER A. HOEL, University of Virginia SECRETARY GORDON J. LINTON, U.S. Department of Transportation ROBERT J. REILLY ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR., Transportation Research Board TRB DAVID N. WORMLEY, Pennsylvania State University T RANSIT C OOPERATIVE R ESEARCH PROGRAM Report 12 Guidelines for Transit Facility Signing and Graphics KRW, Inc. Alexandria, VA Subject Area Public Transit Research Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration in Cooperation with the Transit Development Corporation T RANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. 1996 TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM TCRP REPORT 12 The nation's growth and the need to meet mobility, Project A-9 FY'93 environmental, and energy objectives place demands on public ISSN 1073-4872 transit systems. Current systems, some of which are old and in ISBN 0-309-05715-9 Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 96-60356 need of upgrading, must expand service area, increase service frequency, and improve efficiency to serve these demands. Price $24.00 Research is necessary to solve operating problems, to adapt appropriate new technologies from other industries, and to introduce innovations into the transit industry. The Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) serves as one of the principal means by which the transit industry can develop innovative near-term solutions to meet demands placed on it. The need for TCRP was originally identified in TRB Special Report 213—Research for Public Transit: New Directions, NOTICE published in 1987 and based on a study sponsored by the Urban Mass Transportation Administration—now the Federal Transit The project that is the subject of this report was a part of the Transit Administration (FTA). A report by the American Public Transit Cooperative Research Program conducted by the Transportation Research Association (APTA), Transportation 2000, also recognized the Board with the approval of the Governing Board of the National Research need for local, problem-solving research. TCRP, modeled after Council. Such approval reflects the Governing Board's judgment that the the longstanding and successful National Cooperative Highway project concerned is appropriate with respect to both the purposes and Research Program, undertakes research and other technical resources of the National Research Council. activities in response to the needs of transit service providers. The members of the technical advisory panel selected to monitor this project The scope of TCRP includes a variety of transit research fields and to review this report were chosen for recognized scholarly competence and with due consideration for the balance of disciplines appropriate to the project. including planning, service configuration, equipment, facilities, The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied are those of the research operations, human resources, maintenance, policy, and agency that performed the research, and while they have been accepted as administrative practices. appropriate by the technical panel, they are not necessarily those of the TCRP was established under FTA sponsorship in July 1992. Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, the Transit Proposed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, TCRP was Development Corporation, or the Federal Transit Administration of the U.S. authorized as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Department of Transportation. Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). On May 13, 1992, a Each report is reviewed and accepted for publication by the technical panel memorandum agreement outlining TCRP operating procedures according to procedures established and monitored by the Transportation Research Board Executive Committee and the Governing Board of the National was executed by the three cooperating organizations: FTA, the Research Council. National Academy of Sciences, acting through the Transportation Research Board (TRB), and the Transit Development Corporation, Inc. (TDC), a nonprofit educational and research organization established by APTA. TDC is responsible for Special Notice forming the independent governing board, designated as the TCRP Oversight and Project Selection (TOPS) Committee.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Personal to Mass Transit
    From personal to mass transit Prof. em. Ingmar Andreasson [email protected] 40 years in transportation • Transit network planning - VIPS • Taxi fleet management - Taxi80 • Multi-discipline PRT research - Chalmers • Road traffic research – KTH • 5 PRT patents • VP, Advanced Transit Association Storyline • A challenging podcar application • Five strategies to cope with large demand • => Mass transit with podcars The challenge • Dense urban area in California • Very large employers • Severe highway congestion • Promote non-car modes • Transfers from Train and LRT • Connecting buildings (horizontal elevator) Contract with PRTConsulting Legend Staon 6 28 mph main guideway 22 mph main guideway 24 21 16 ONE MILE 12 15 4 3 25 10 DOWNTOWN 6 STADIUM PARKING 14 9 2 34 18 13 8 5 TRANSIT 20 19 7 22 11 32 MEDICAL CENTER 23 26 31 33 27 28 1 RAIL STATION Legend Staon 51 28 mph main guideway 22 mph main guideway 22 mph feeder guideway (with slowing at staons) 500 Feet Our tentative design • 50 stations • 48 kms main guideway (6 % double) • 4 bi-level intersections out of 54 • Speeds 36 and 45 kph • Headway 3 secs (as certified) • 900 vehicles with 6-seats Morning peak hour demand • 13 000 passengers • 30 % of trips from 3 transfer stations • 400 passengers from one train • Many dispersed destinations Train / PRT station Morning peak demand 13 000 / h Personal Rapid Transit • Average 1.5 passengers per vehicle • Can carry 4 800 passengers • 24 mins waiting Ride-matching at departure • System knows requested destinations • First passenger determines
    [Show full text]
  • Chapters 2I-2N
    2009 Edition Page 299 CHAPTER 2I. GENERAL SERVICE SIGNS Section 2I.01 Sizes of General Service Signs Standard: 01 Except as provided in Section 2A.11, the sizes of General Service signs that have a standardized design shall be as shown in Table 2I-1. Support: 02 Section 2A.11 contains information regarding the applicability of the various columns in Table 2I-1. Option: 03 Signs larger than those shown in Table 2I-1 may be used (see Section 2A.11). Table 2I-1. General Service Sign and Plaque Sizes (Sheet 1 of 2) Conventional Freeway or Sign or Plaque Sign Designation Section Road Expressway Rest Area XX Miles D5-1 2I.05 66 x 36* 96 x 54* 120 x 60* (F) Rest Area Next Right D5-1a 2I.05 78 x 36* 114 x 48* (E) Rest Area (with arrow) D5-2 2I.05 66 x 36* 96 x 54* 78 x 78* (F) Rest Area Gore D5-2a 2I.05 42 x 48* 66 x 72* (E) Rest Area (with horizontal arrow) D5-5 2I.05 42 x 48* — Next Rest Area XX Miles D5-6 2I.05 60 x 48* 90 x 72* 114 x 102* (F) Rest Area Tourist Info Center XX Miles D5-7 2I.08 90 x 72* 132 x 96* (E) 120 x 102* (F) Rest Area Tourist Info Center (with arrow) D5-8 2I.08 84 x 72* 120 x 96* (E) 144 x 102* (F) Rest Area Tourist Info Center Next Right D5-11 2I.08 90 x 72* 132 x 96* (E) Interstate Oasis D5-12 2I.04 — 156 x 78 Interstate Oasis (plaque) D5-12P 2I.04 — 114 x 48 Brake Check Area XX Miles D5-13 2I.06 84 x 48 126 x 72 Brake Check Area (with arrow) D5-14 2I.06 78 x 60 96 x 72 Chain-Up Area XX Miles D5-15 2I.07 66 x 48 96 x 72 Chain-Up Area (with arrow) D5-16 2I.07 72 x 54 96 x 66 Telephone D9-1 2I.02 24 x 24 30 x 30 Hospital
    [Show full text]
  • Indianapolis Street Transportation Album Ca
    Collection # P 0523 INDIANAPOLIS STREET TRANSPORTATION ALBUM CA. 1890–CA. LATE 1940S Collection Information Historical Sketch Scope and Content Note Contents Cataloging Information Processed by Barbara Quigley 26 August 2013 Manuscript and Visual Collections Department William Henry Smith Memorial Library Indiana Historical Society 450 West Ohio Street Indianapolis, IN 46202-3269 www.indianahistory.org COLLECTION INFORMATION VOLUME OF One album with 16 photographs plus one loose photograph COLLECTION: COLLECTION Ca. 1890–ca. late 1940s (includes later copies of some of the DATES: earlier images) PROVENANCE: Transferred from the Indiana Historical Society's education library in December 2011 RESTRICTIONS: None COPYRIGHT: REPRODUCTION Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection RIGHTS: must be obtained from the Indiana Historical Society. ALTERNATE FORMATS: RELATED HOLDINGS: ACCESSION 2011.0349 NUMBER: NOTES: See also: Indianapolis Street Railways Collection (OMB 20, BV 3038–3049) HISTORICAL SKETCH The Citizens' Street Railway Company operated mule-drawn streetcars on Illinois Street in downtown Indianapolis in 1864, and this service grew as the city expanded. The Citizens' Street Railroad Company, founded by investors from Chicago, bought the system in 1888 and converted it from animal to electric power. The Indianapolis Street Railway Company purchased the system in 1899, allowed interurban electric trains to use its lines in 1900, and bought control of the Indianapolis–Broad Ripple line in 1902. The company began operating buses in 1925. In 1932 Indianapolis Railways, Inc. bought the system and became the first transit operator anywhere to use the trackless trolley in downtown traffic. The trackless trolley completely replaced the traditional streetcar in Indianapolis in January 1953.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORTATION for TRANSITION PACKET a Project of the Scott County, Iowa, Transition Advisory Board
    TRANSPORTATION FOR TRANSITION PACKET A Project of the Scott County, Iowa, Transition Advisory Board Thank you to the following people who assisted in developing this packet: Becky Passman, Project Manager/Iowa Quad Cities Transit Coordinator, Bi-State Regional Commission Steve Swisher, Director of Business Development, River Bend Transit Lori Brown, Orientation & Mobility Specialist, Mississippi Bend Area Education Agency Packet contents: Glossary of transit terms. Use for vocabulary development! Overview of Transit Systems in the Quad-Cities. To help you get started! Overview of River Bend Transit, including para transit information Points for Class Discussions and Activities Route Maps & Schedules overview. To help you plan routes! Sample City Bus routes from each high school in Scott County Transportation Skill lists to continually assess student skills. And to help write goals! This packet is intended to help schools and community agencies understand and teach the use of public transportation for persons with disabilities. After high school, the ability to travel in the community as independently as possible is essential for adult living, learning and working. Please request a Rider’s Guide if you do not already have one, to assist your efforts in teaching transportation skills to your students and clients. Call 309-793-6302, ext 144 to get a supply for your school, or get individual copies at bus terminals or city halls in Davenport or Bettendorf. The Rider’s Guide is an extremely valuable resource! For further information
    [Show full text]
  • November 17, 2015 2424 Piedmont Road, NE Atlanta, GA 30324-3330
    arta 2424 Piedmont Road, NE Atlanta, GA 30324-3330 404-848-5000 November 17, 2015 TO ALL PROSPECTIVE PROPONENTS SUBJECT: ADDENDUM NUMBER 4 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NUMBER P35484 PROCUREMENT OF FORTY FOOT (40') CNG BUSES Transmitted herewith is Addendum Number 4 to the subject Request for Proposals. The Request for Proposals (RFP) is hereby modified as follows: 1. Revisions to existing text are identified by a vertical line in the right margin of the line in which a revision occurs. 2. The pages replaced by this Addendum are identified by a number "A-4" in the top right corner of the replaced pages. DOCUMENT REPLACE PAGES DELETE EXISTING PAGES Form 3 28-34 28-34 Exhibit A 167,188,192 167,188,192 METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY Lisa DeGrace Director, Contracts, Procurement and Materials Attachment cc: MARTA's Website Contract File METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY www.itsmarta.com A-4 Form 3 - Appendix A MARTA Pricing Schedule- Base Bus Pricing (2017 Delivery) PPI Applies to pricing for ;!Q18 & ;!Q1Q 01/ out-year Deliveries for the term of the contract (For buses and all other pricing-Category 1413 will be used) Item Per Unit &ase Price Quantity Total Price I Base Bus Price-40 ft. LF CNG $ - 235 $ - i Delivery Charges $ - 235 $ - I $ - MARTA Equipment Pricing (Included in Base Bus Price) TS 70.2 Bike Rack - 'I TS 83 Destination Sig ns I TS 86.1 Surveillance System I .- J TS 86.4.5 Transit Master ITS-AVL ! TS 86.4.6 Zonar inspection System TS 87 Collision Avoidance System - ft.
    [Show full text]
  • © Gary Darkas 2012 © Gary Darkas 2012 CONTENTS
    © Gary Darkas 2012 © Gary Darkas 2012 CONTENTS Sections INTRODUCTION IDENTITY TYPE BRANDING WOLFSBURG EDITION TYPOGRAPHY CORPORATE INFORMATION KEYFRAME MOMENTS PRODUCTION PLANTS VOLKSWAGEN ADVERTISING KEY PRODUCTS REFERENCE © Gary Darkas 2012 INTRODUCTION VOLKSWAGEN HISTORY The History Of The VW 1936-2012 1936 The Birth Of A Company And Its Name he word “volkswagen” means Ferdinand Porsche to make changes T“people’s car.” The Volkswagen to Porsche’s original 1931 design to Aktiengesellschaft (VAG), also make it more suited for the working known as Volkswagen Group or as man. (Béla Barényi is credited with VW, is an automobile manufacturer having conceived the basic design and mobility organisation based in five years earlier.) Hans Ledwinka Wolfsburg, Lower Saxony, Germany discussed his ideas with Ferdinand and is the pioneer brand within the Porsche, who used many Tatra Volkswagen Group, which contains design features in the 1938 “KdF- the car brands Audi AG, Bentley Wagen”, later known as the VW Motors Ltd., Automobiles Bugatti Käfer-or Volkswagen Beetle. On 22 SA, Automobili Lamborghini, June 1934, Dr. Ferdinand Porsche SEAT, Škoda Auto and heavy agreed to create the “People’s Car” goods vehicle manufacturer Scania for Hitler’s mother. AB. The Supervisory Board of Prototypes of the car called the Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft “KdF-Wagen” (German: Kraft durch (VAG) has endorsed the creation Freude - “strength through joy”), of an integrated automotive group appeared from 1936 onwards (the with Porsche under the leadership of first cars had been produced in Volkswagen. Stuttgart. On 28 May 1937. Adolf Hitler had a keen interest in DR. FERDINAND PORSCHE cars even though he did not like to drive, as he was especially inspired by the American automotive giant Henry Ford, who Hitler referred to as Heinrich Ford.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Traffic Regulations, 1984
    Statutory Instruments Supplement No. Supplement to Official Gazette No. dated , ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATIONS, 1984 Arrangement of Regulations GENERAL 1. Short title 2. Interpretation PART I DRIVING AND CONDUCTORS LICENCES AND LEARNERS PERMITS 3. Application for driving licence 4. Driving test 5. Issue of driving licences 6. Special licences for drivers and conductors of public service vehicles 7. Production on demand of conductor’s licence 8. Driver’s or conductor’s badge 9. Replacement of lost licences and badges 10. Revocation or suspension of conductor’s licence by court 11. Revocation, because of diseases etc., of licence to drive public service vehicle 12. Revocation or suspension of conductor’s licence by Licensing Authority THE LAWS OF BARBADOS Printed by the Government Printer, Bay Street, St. Michael by the authority of the Government of Barbados 2 STATUTORY INSTRUMENT PART II INSPECTION OF OTHER MOTOR VEHICLES 13. Inspector’s certificate required for issue of licence for public service and other vehicles 14. Inspection of vehicles PART III CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE AND TRAILERS 15. Conditions of use of vehicle or trailer on road 16. Brakes 17. Trailers to be equipped with brakes 18. Condition of vehicles 19. Restrictions on change of construction or use of private motor vehicles 20. Requirements 21. Offence 22. Headlamps 23. Lamps 24. Stipulations re lamp 25. Reflectors THE LAWS OF BARBADOS Printed by the Government Printer, Bay Street, St. Michael by the authority of the Government of Barbados STATUTORY INSTRUMENT 3 26. No lighted lamp required when vehicle stationary 27. Permission of Licensing Authority required for lamps to be carried on motor vehicles 28.
    [Show full text]
  • ADA Service Provisions Bus Stop Announcements
    ADA Service Provisions Bus Stop Announcements - Operators must announce or cause to be announced: 1. all bus stops that are transfer points with other bus lines 2. bus stops at major intersections and destination points; and 3. bus stops at intervals along the route sufficient to permit persons with disabilities to be oriented to their location along the route. Specific bus stops must also be announced at the request of passengers with disabilities. Bus operators are required to use the automated voice annunciation system on buses so equipped. On all other buses, or where a passenger has requested a specific stop announcement, bus operators are to use the interior public address (PA) system to announce stops. In cases where no PA or automated annunciation system exists, or is working, bus operators are to announce stops directly to the passengers. All non-working stop announcement equipment is to be reported to dispatch/ maintenance immediately. Bus Route/Route Destination Identification - All MMVTA buses are to display the bus route number and destination on the destination sign display area above the windshield in the bus exterior. The route destination will also be displayed to the bus exterior in the upper portion of the forward-most passenger window on the curbside of most buses where bus design allows. MMVTA bus operators are to announce or cause to be announced the bus route and destination of the bus to waiting passengers at bus stops serving more than one bus route. Exterior automated annunciators, public address, and direct announcement by bus operators are to be used to effect this requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • Specific Service Signs Shall Be Defined As Guide Signs
    Proposed Revision No. 2 Page 2F-1 CHAPTER 2F. SPECIFIC SERVICE SIGNS Section 2F.01 Eligibility Standard: Specific Service signs shall be defined as guide signs that provide road users with business identification and directional information for services and for eligible attractions. Guidance: The use of Specific Service signs should be limited to areas primarily rural in character or to areas where adequate sign spacing can be maintained. Option: Where an engineering study determines a need, Specific Service signs may be used on any class of highways. Guidance: Specific Service signs should not be installed at an interchange where the road user cannot conveniently reenter the freeway or expressway and continue in the same direction of travel. Standard: Eligible service facilities shall comply with laws concerning the provisions of public accommodations without regard to race, religion, color, age, sex, or national origin, and laws concerning the licensing and approval of service facilities. The attraction services shall include only facilities which have the primary purpose of providing amusement, historical, cultural, or leisure activities to the public. Guidance: Distances to eligible services should not exceed 5 km (3 mi) in either direction. Option: If, within the 5 km (3 mi) limit, facilities for the services being considered are not available or choose not to participate in the program, the limit of eligibility may be extended in 5 km (3 mi) increments until one or more facilities for the services being considered chooses to participate, or until 25 km (15 mi) is reached, whichever comes first. Page 2F-2 Proposed Revision No. 2 Guidance: If State or local agencies elect to provide Specific Service signing, there should be a statewide policy for such signing and criteria for the availability of the various types of services.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    FTA-VA-26-7026-2003.1 U.S. Department of Transportation Best Practices BUS SIGNAGE FOR PERSONS WITH VISUAL IMPAIRMENTS: LIGHT- EMITTING DIODE (LED) SIGNS January 2004 Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED January 2004 May 2002 – January 2004 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Best Practices. Bus Signage for Persons With Visual Impairments: Light- Emitting Signs DTFT # 60-99-D-41031 6. AUTHOR(S) Paul H. Cunningham, Joel A. Ogden, David F. Wourms 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) REPORT NUMBER Booz Allen Hamilton 1900 Founders Dr. Suite 300 Dayton, OH 45420 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration FTA-VA-26-7026-2003.1 400 7th Street, SW Washington, DC 2590 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE National Technical Information Service/NTIS, Springfield, VA 22161.
    [Show full text]
  • PASSENGER TRANSPORT ACT 1990—REGULATION (Passenger Transport (Taxi-Cab Services) Regulation 1995) NEW SOUTH WALES
    1995—No. 399 PASSENGER TRANSPORT ACT 1990—REGULATION (Passenger Transport (Taxi-cab Services) Regulation 1995) NEW SOUTH WALES [Published in Gazette No. 102 of 25 August 1995] HIS Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, and in pursuance of the Passenger Transport Act 1990, has been pleased to make the Regulation set forth hereunder. BRIAN LANGTON, M.P., Minister for Transport. PART 1—PRELIMINARY Citation 1. This Regulation may be cited as the Passenger Transport (Taxi-cab Services) Regulation 1995. Commencement 2. This Regulation commences on 1 September 1995. Definitions 3. In this Regulation: “area of operations” of a taxi-cab means the area within which the taxi-cab is authorised by its licence to ply for hire; “authorised fare”, in relation to the hiring of a taxi-cab, means the amount charged for the hiring in accordance with the conditions of the licence for the taxi-cab or (if the condtions of the licence do not provide for the fare to be charged) in accordance with the provisions of clause 40 (4); “authorised officer” includes a person authorised by the Director- General of the Department of Transport for the purposes of this Regulation, and also includes a police officer; 2 1995—No. 399 “authority” means an authority issued under Division 2 of Part 2 of the Act; “drive” a taxi-cab includes causing or allowing the taxi-cab to stand; “driver” of a taxi-cab means a person who holds an authority that authorises the person to drive a taxi-cab; “driver’s authority card” means an authority card issued under
    [Show full text]
  • TCQSM Part 8
    Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual—2nd Edition PART 8 GLOSSARY This part of the manual presents definitions for the various transit terms discussed and referenced in the manual. Other important terms related to transit planning and operations are included so that this glossary can serve as a readily accessible and easily updated resource for transit applications beyond the evaluation of transit capacity and quality of service. As a result, this glossary includes local definitions and local terminology, even when these may be inconsistent with formal usage in the manual. Many systems have their own specific, historically derived, terminology: a motorman and guard on one system can be an operator and conductor on another. Modal definitions can be confusing. What is clearly light rail by definition may be termed streetcar, semi-metro, or rapid transit in a specific city. It is recommended that in these cases local usage should prevail. AADT — annual average daily ATP — automatic train protection. AADT—accessibility, transit traffic; see traffic, annual average ATS — automatic train supervision; daily. automatic train stop system. AAR — Association of ATU — Amalgamated Transit Union; see American Railroads; see union, transit. Aorganizations, Association of American Railroads. AVL — automatic vehicle location system. AASHTO — American Association of State AW0, AW1, AW2, AW3 — see car, weight Highway and Transportation Officials; see designations. organizations, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. absolute block — see block, absolute. AAWDT — annual average weekday traffic; absolute permissive block — see block, see traffic, annual average weekday. absolute permissive. ABS — automatic block signal; see control acceleration — increase in velocity per unit system, automatic block signal.
    [Show full text]