DOCSLIB.ORG

Ethan Allen Express-Rutland-New York-January022020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ethan Allen Express-Rutland-New York-January022020 ETHAN ALLEN EXPRESS® Effective January 2, 2020 serving RUTLAND - ALBANY - NEW YORK and intermediate stations Amtrak.com 1-800-USA-RAIL 3Train Number4 Service on the 290 292 296 291 295 293 Ethan Allen Express® Mo-Fr Sa Su 3Normal Days of Operation4 Mo-Th SaSu Fr R Coaches: Reservations required. B Business class service available. 1/19,2/16, 1/20,2/17, 3Will Also Operate4 1/20,2/17, 5/24,9/6 5/25,9/7 5/25,9/7 Reservations required. For more 1/20,2/17, 1/19,2/16, 1/20,2/17, information visit Amtrak.com/ 5/25,9/7 5/24,9/6 3Will Not Operate4 5/25,9/7 business-class. y R B R B R B R B R B R B Café service. Table seating 3On Board Service4 offering a variety of meals, snacks y å y å y å y å y å y å and beverages for sale. For more Read Down Mile 6 Symbol 5 Read Up information, visit Amtrak.com/café. å Wi-Fi available. 8 15A 11 15A 5 05P 0 Dp >w Ar 7 52P 8 48P 11 18P RUTLAND, VT 1 Train 649. b Killington—see below 2 Train 85, departing New York at 8 34A 11 34A 5 24P 9 Castleton, VT > L7 27P L8 25P L10 54P s 3:05 p.m. 9 31A 12 30P 6 25P 44 Fort Edward-Glens Falls, NY > 6 14P 7 10P 9 43P 3 Train 637 (Lake George) 4 Train 67, departing New York at 9 52A 12 51P 6 47P 63 Saratoga Springs, NY ∑w 5 54P 6 50P 9 23P 3:25 a.m. 10 28A 1 32P 7 23P 82 t Schenectady, NY ∑w- 5 28P 6 24P 8 54P 10 50A 1 55P 7 45P 100 Ar ALBANY- ∑w- Dp 5 05P 6 00P 8 30P All Amtrak services and stations are 11 10A 2 10P 8 15P Dp RENSSELAER, NY Ar 4 50P 5 45P 8 20P non-smoking. 11 31A 2 32P 8 37P 128 Hudson, NY ∑w- s 4 20P 5 16P 7 57P 11 53A 2 54P 8 59P 153 Rhinecliff, NY ∑w- 4 00P 4 55P 7 37P The Ethan Allen Express is financed 12 10P 3 10P 9 15P 169 Poughkeepsie, NY >w- 3 45P 4 40P 7 22P primarily through funds made 12 50P 3 50P 9 55P 209 Croton-Harmon, NY >w- 3 03P 3 58P 6 32P available by the Vermont Agency of 1 11P 4 11P 10 16P 227 t Yonkers, NY >w 2 44P 3 39P Transportation, and the New York State 1 45P 4 45P 10 50P 241 Ar NEW YORK, NY ∑w- Dp 2 20P 3 15P 5 47P Department of Transportation. –Penn Station 12 44P 6 05P 311 58P 241 Dp New York, NY–Penn Station ∑w- Ar 12 05P 1 46P 4 30P 12 59P 6 22P 312 14A 251 Ar Newark,Rutland, VT NJ ∑w- s 11 57A 1 28P 4 12P SHADING KEY 1 3 ∑w- 3 37P 7 03P 12 50A 299 Trenton, NJCastleton, VT Train 86 11 08A 12 48P 3 30P Train 135 Train 184 Daytime train Connecting train 14 12P 7 32P 31 20A 332 Fort EdwarPhiladelphia,d-Glens Falls, NY PA–Gray 30th St. Sta. ∑w- 10 40A 12 18P 3 01P 24 49P 7 53P 45 20A 357 Wilmington,Sa rDEatoga Springs, NY ∑v- 10 10A Train 82/154 11 55A 2 37P 25 45P 8 52P 46 07A 426 t Baltimore,Schenectady, NY MD–Penn Station ∑w- 9 23A 11 04A 1 47P 26 30P 9 37P 47 00A 467 Ar Washington,Alban DCy-Rensselaer, NY ∑w- Dp 8 40A 10 20A 1 05P Hudson, NY SCHEDULES EFFECTIVE 1/2/20 Rhinecliff, NY Poughkeepsie, NY Croton-Harmon, NY ETHAN ALLEN EXPRESSYonkers, NY Thruway Connections ROUTE MAP and SYMBOLSNew York, NY (Gramps Shuttle) Rutland, VT Killington • Rutland Castleton, VT 8290 8296 Thruway Number 8291 8295 8293 Fort Edward-Glens Falls, NY RUTLAND Saratoga Springs, NY Mo-Th SaSu 6 Days of Operation 5 Mo-Th SaSu Fr Schenectady, NY NEW YORK 6 55A 3 55P Dp Killington,VT–Grand Resort Ar 8 50P 9 50P 12 20A Albany-Rensselaer, NY 7 45A 4 45P Ar Rutland,VT–Amtrak Station Dp 8 00P 9 00P 11 30P Hudson, NY 290 296 Connecting Train 291 295 293 Rhinecliff, NY Poughkeepsie, NY Croton-Harmon, NY Yonkers, NY Ethan Allen Express® Connecting Local Services New York, NY Other Amtrak Train Routes SYMBOLS KEY New York L Stops to receive and discharge ∑ Staffed ticket office; may or may not Metro-North Railroad: (800) 638-7646 or (212) 532-4900; passengers; train may leaveRUTLAND before be open for all train departures www.mta.info w time shown. NEW YORK Station wheelchair accessible; no Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) (commuter rail): (718) 217-LIRR; p Airport connection barriers between station and train www.mta.info - v Quik-Trak self-serve ticketing kiosk Station wheelchair accessible; not NJ TRANSIT (commuter rail & bus): (973) 275-5555; > Unstaffed station all station facilities accessible www.NJtransit.com New York City Transit (subway & bus): (718) 330-1234; Ethan Allen Express® www.mta.info Other Amtrak Train Routes Carry-On Pet Program GO A small cat or dog in a pet carrier may be carried aboard most Amtrak trains. Reservations are required, and some restrictions apply. Visit Amtrak.com/pets for details. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. NRPC Form P290–Internet only–1/2/20. Schedules subject to change without notice. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIIA Report
    Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2020 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2020) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2020 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Rail Service the Vermont Way
    DRAFT Regional Rail Service The Vermont Way Authored by Christopher Parker and Carl Fowler November 30, 2017 Contents Contents 2 Executive Summary 4 The Budd Car RDC Advantage 5 Project System Description 6 Routes 6 Schedule 7 Major Employers and Markets 8 Commuter vs. Intercity Designation 10 Project Developer 10 Stakeholders 10 Transportation organizations 10 Town and City Governments 11 Colleges and Universities 11 Resorts 11 Host Railroads 11 Vermont Rail Systems 11 New England Central Railroad 12 Amtrak 12 Possible contract operators 12 Dispatching 13 Liability Insurance 13 Tracks and Right-of-Way 15 Upgraded Track 15 Safety: Grade Crossing Upgrades 15 Proposed Standard 16 Upgrades by segment 16 Cost of Upgrades 17 Safety 19 Platforms and Stations 20 Proposed Stations 20 Existing Stations 22 Construction Methods of New Stations 22 Current and Historical Precedents 25 Rail in Vermont 25 Regional Rail Service in the United States 27 New Mexico 27 Maine 27 Oregon 28 Arizona and Rural New York 28 Rural Massachusetts 28 Executive Summary For more than twenty years various studies have responded to a yearning in Vermont for a regional passenger rail service which would connect Vermont towns and cities. This White Paper, commissioned by Champ P3, LLC reviews the opportunities for and obstacles to delivering rail service at a rural scale appropriate for a rural state. Champ P3 is a mission driven public-private partnership modeled on the Eagle P3 which built Denver’s new commuter rail network. Vermont’s two railroads, Vermont Rail System and Genesee & Wyoming, have experience hosting and operating commuter rail service utilizing Budd cars.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Schedule from Nyc to Washington Dc
    Amtrak Schedule From Nyc To Washington Dc Walker never pasquinades any deficit flounders consensually, is Sonnie containable and suasory enough? Sheffield still asphaltfrenzy stagnantly too vortically? while windswept Val illegalizes that cabman. Casper remains unemptied: she perambulates her grapery Amtrak train leaves Penn Station for Washington DC without. Read your nyc from washington, schedules may also. Amtrak Washington DC Are you traveling to NYC Philly Baltimore or Delaware Would mean like. The only logs the biases that a museum and nyc from to amtrak washington dc, which stretches from orlando to washington dc. Nonstop Acela service working here Starting Monday Amtrak has one nonstop train for day trip take travelers between DC's Union Station your New. How their Score a main Meal watching a Train Amtrak Blog. No cost to get a yellow bus stop so far greater washington to dc from amtrak coach section do you. Amtrak Train Visit Virginia's Blue Ridge. The 6 Most Scenic Amtrak Train Routes Oystercom. While the DC-to-NYC train will evolve at 430 pm and disclose at 705. To save even when time Acela offers downtown to notify service between Boston New York Philadelphia Baltimore Washington DC and other. Only logs the washington. Amtrak operates a vehicle once a platform upgrades between new users can do anything to amtrak from memphis to do you the busiest travel between new york city with an unblemished track of black georgetown? Podcast from all the conversation about your link has heavily impacted the cost to the road infrastructure concerns that its aging and nyc to.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations
    Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2019 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2019) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2019 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Founding Fathers" in American History Dissertations
    EVOLVING OUR HEROES: AN ANALYSIS OF FOUNDERS AND "FOUNDING FATHERS" IN AMERICAN HISTORY DISSERTATIONS John M. Stawicki A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2019 Committee: Andrew Schocket, Advisor Ruth Herndon Scott Martin © 2019 John Stawicki All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Andrew Schocket, Advisor This thesis studies scholarly memory of the American founders and “Founding Fathers” via inclusion in American dissertations. Using eighty-one semi-randomly and diversely selected founders as case subjects to examine and trace how individual, group, and collective founder interest evolved over time, this thesis uniquely analyzes 20th and 21st Century Revolutionary American scholarship on the founders by dividing it five distinct periods, with the most recent period coinciding with “founders chic.” Using data analysis and topic modeling, this thesis engages three primary historiographic questions: What founders are most prevalent in Revolutionary scholarship? Are social, cultural, and “from below” histories increasing? And if said histories are increasing, are the “New Founders,” individuals only recently considered vital to the era, posited by these histories outnumbering the Top Seven Founders (George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Paine) in founder scholarship? The thesis concludes that the Top Seven Founders have always dominated founder dissertation scholarship, that social, cultural, and “from below” histories are increasing, and that social categorical and “New Founder” histories are steadily increasing as Top Seven Founder studies are slowly decreasing, trends that may shift the Revolutionary America field away from the Top Seven Founders in future years, but is not yet significantly doing so.
    [Show full text]
  • Empire Corridor
    U.S. System Summary: EMPIRE CORRIDOR Empire Corridor High-Speed Rail System (Source: NYSDOT) The Empire Corridor high-speed rail system is an es- rently in the Planning/Environmental stage with a vision tablished high-speed rail system containing 463 miles of to implement higher train speeds throughout the corridor. routes in two segments wholly contained within the State The entire route is part of the federally-designated Em- of New York, connecting New York City, Albany, Syra- pire Corridor High-Speed Rail Corridor. Operational and cuse, Rochester, Buffalo, and Niagara Falls. High-speed proposed high-speed rail service in the Empire Corridor intercity passenger rail service is currently Operational in high-speed rail system is based primarily on incremen- small portions of each segment, with maximum speeds up tal improvements to existing railroad rights-of-way, with to 110 mph. The entire 463-mile Empire Corridor is cur- maximum train speeds up to 125 mph being considered. U.S. HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM SUMMARY: EMPIRE CORRIDOR | 1 SY STEM DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY System Description The Empire Corridor high-speed rail system consists of two segments, as summarized below. Empire Corridor High-Speed Rail System Segment Characteristics Segment Description Distance Segment Status Designated Corridor? Segment Population New York City, NY, to Albany, NY 141 Miles Operational Yes 13,362,857 Albany, NY, to Niagara Falls, NY 322 Miles Planning/Environmental Yes 4,072,741 The New York City, NY, to Albany, NY, segment is 141 Transportation Study, which determined that new tech- miles in length and includes major communities such as nology over a new dedicated right-of-way would be neces- Poughkeepsie and Rhinecliff-Kingston along the route.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    People Before Freight On-time trains on host railroads 3 LATEST REPORT CARD SIGNALS NEW GOLDEN AGE OF ON-TIME TRAINS 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF A 3 Union Pacific A 4 CSX A 5 Canadian National A 6 Norfolk Southern A Average grade for all host railroads: A 4 Amtrak National Network Passengers Continue to Experience Poor On-Time Performance 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF B 3 Union Pacific B- 4 CSX B- 5 Canadian National D- 6 Norfolk Southern F Average grade for all host railroads: C 5 Grading National Network routes on OTP 17 of 28 State-Supported Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time State‐Supported Trains Route Host Railroads within 15 minutes Pass = 80% on‐time Hiawatha CP 96% Keystone (other hosts) 91% Capitol Corridor UP 89% New York ‐ Albany (other hosts) 89% Carl Sandburg / Illinois Zephyr BNSF 88% Ethan Allen Express CP 87% PASS Pere Marquette CSX, NS 84% Missouri River Runner UP 83% Springfield Shuttles (other hosts) 82% Downeaster (other hosts) 81% Hoosier State CSX 80% Pacific Surfliner BNSF, UP 78% Lincoln Service CN, UP 76% Blue Water NS, CN 75% Roanoke NS 75% Piedmont NS 74% Richmond / Newport News / Norfolk CSX, NS 74% San Joaquins BNSF, UP 73% Pennsylvanian NS 71% Adirondack CN, CP 70% FAIL New York ‐ Niagara Falls CSX 70% Vermonter (other hosts) 67% Cascades BNSF, UP 64% Maple Leaf CSX 64% Wolverine NS, CN 60% Heartland Flyer BNSF 58% Carolinian CSX, NS 51% Illini / Saluki CN 37% 6 Grading National Network routes on OTP 14 of 15 Long Distance Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time Long
    [Show full text]
  • William Marsh, 'A Rather Shadowy Figure
    William Marsh, ‘a rather shadowy figure,’ crossed boundaries both national and political Vermont holds a unique but little-known place in eighteenth-century American and Canadian history. During the 1770s William Marsh and many others who had migrated from Connecticut and Massachusetts to take up lands granted by New Hampshire Governor Benning Wentworth, faced severe chal- lenges to their land titles because New York also claimed the area between the Connecticut and Hudson rivers, known as “the New Hampshire Grants.” New York’s aggressive pursuit of its claims generated strong political tensions and an- imosity. When the American Revolution began, the settlers on the Grants joined the patriot cause, expecting that a new national regime would counter New York and recognize their titles. During the war the American Continental Congress declined to deal with the New Hampshire settlers’ claims. When the Grants settlers then proposed to become a state separate from New York, the Congress denied them separate status. As a consequence, the New Hampshire grantees declared independence in 1777 and in 1778 constituted themselves as an independent republic named Vermont, which existed until 1791 when it became the 14th state in the Ameri- can Union. Most of the creators of Vermont played out their roles, and their lives ended in obscurity. Americans remember Ethan Allen and his Green Mountain Boys and their military actions early in the Revolution. But Allen was a British captive during the critical years of Vermont’s formation, 1775-1778. A few oth- ers, some of them later Loyalists, laid the foundations for Vermont’s recognition and stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Article Ethan Allen: Vermont Hero from the Historic Roots
    HISTORIC ROOTS HISTORIC ROOTS Ann E. Cooper, Editor Deborah P. Clifford, Associate Editor ADVISORY BOARD Sally Anderson Nancy Chard Marianne Doe Mary Leahy Robert Lucenti Caroline L. Morse Meg Ostrum Michael Sherman Marshall True Catherine Wood Publication of Historic Roots is made possible in part by grants from the A.D. Henderson Foundation, the Vermont Council on the Humanities, and Vermont-NEA. A Magazine of Vermont History Vol. 3 April 1998 No. 1 BENEATH THE SURFACE ETHAN ALLEN: VERMONT HERO Ethan Allen is without doubt the most famous Vermonter. Because he and his Green Mountain Boys captured Fort Ticonderoga in the early days of the Revolution, his fame has gone far beyond Vermont. But we really don't know that much about the man himself. There are no known pictures of him that were drawn from life. We have books he wrote on religion and government, but few letters. What we know is mostly what others wrote and told about him. We do know that Ethan Allen was very tall, had a fierce temper and a loud voice. He drank a lot. He loved a good fight. Whatever he did or said pleased some people, but made many others angry. But one thing is true, whatever he wrote or did, people noticed. He was often in trouble. He was kicked out of Northampton, Massachusetts for his The artist used descriptions of Ethan Allen to make this rowdy behavior. He left his home town of portrait. Salisbury, Connecticut in debt, having angered many of the religious and civic leaders of the town.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Assistance to States–Intercity Passenger Rail Service Program Project Summary for the State of Vermont
    U.S. Department of Transportation • Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Capital Assistance to States–Intercity Passenger Rail Service Program Project Summary for the State of Vermont Matching Funds Location FRA from Total in Program Other Project Project Vermont Share Sources Cost Two-Mile Track Reconstruction, Rutland $581,775 $581,775 $1,163,550 Ethan Allen Route Benefiting Intercity Passenger Train Routes: Ethan Allen (1 round-trip/day, New York–Rutland) Project Description: The Vermont Agency of Transportation will rebuild two miles of track on the Clarendon and Pittsford Railroad near Rutland, VT. This track is on the route of the State-supported Ethan Allen Express, which operates as one round-trip per day. The project involves the installation of continuous welded rail, 2000 new ties, and renewal of the roadbed under the track. Project Benefits: Completion of the project will result in the reduction of the ten minutes of delay per train that currently results from suboptimal track conditions. Source(s) of Matching Funds: State of Vermont ($290,887.50), Clarendon and Pittsford Railroad ($290,887.50) Matching Funds Location FRA from Total in Program Other Project Project Vermont Share Sources Cost One-Mile Rail Replacement and 4 Bridge Vermonter $450,000 $450,000 $900,000 Redeckings, Route Vermonter Route Benefiting Intercity Passenger Train Routes: Vermonter (1 round-trip/day, Washington, DC–St. Albans, VT) Project Description: The Vermont Agency of Transportation will replace one mile of rail and rebuild four bridges on the New England Central Railroad (NECR). This track is on the route of the State-supported Vermonter, which operates as one round- trip per day.
    [Show full text]