DOCSLIB.ORG

Preparedness

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preparedness COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN (CEMP) the Town of Palm Beach November 2012 Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) for the Town of Palm Beach, Florida November 2012 by Peter Elwell, Town Manager developed under contract by All Hands Consulting Columbia, Maryland all rights reserved © copyright 2012, Town of Palm Beach, Florida This Page Is Left Blank Intentionally Town of Palm Beach, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Florida ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CEMP REVISION PROJECT WORKGROUP REPRESENTATIVES Name Title Department JAY BOODHESHWAR Emergency Management Director Town Manager’s Office MIKE GALVIN EOC Coordinator Town Manager’s Office CHERYL KLEEN Executive Assistant Town Manager’s Office KAREN TEMME Risk Manager Town Manager’s Office SPENCER WILSON Information Services Manager Town Manager’s Office RICK HOWE Major Police GINO SILVESTRI Sergeant Police DARRELL DONATTO Deputy Chief of Fire-Rescue Fire- Rescue BRODIE ATWATER Assistant Fire-Rescue Chief Fire-Rescue ROGER LANE Division Chief of Training Fire-Rescue ERIC BROWN Assistant Director of Public Works Public Works DOUG TERRY Water Resources Manager Public Works ROD GARDINER Assistant Director of Recreation Recreation JOHN PAGE Director of Planning, Zoning and Building Planning, Zoning & Building JEFF TAYLOR Chief Building Official Planning, Zoning, & Building KATHRYN DYSON Human Resource Analyst Human Resources AMY WOOD Accounting Supervisor Finance Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) i November 2012 Town of Palm Beach, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Florida This Page Is Left Blank Intentionally Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) ii November 2012 Town of Palm Beach, TABLE OF CONTENTS Florida TABLE OF CONTENTS BASIC PLAN SECTIONS. .............................................................................................. BP I. INTRODUCTION. ..................................................................................................... 1 A. INTRODUCTION. ............................................................................................................................................. 1 B. PURPOSE, SCOPE, ASSUMPTIONS. ................................................................................................................. 1 C. OBJECTIVES..................................................................................................................................................... 2 D. METHODOLOGY. ............................................................................................................................................ 3 E. STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS. ....................................................................................................................... 4 F. POLICIES. ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 G. AUTHORITIES AND REFERENCES. (PUBLISHED SEPARATLY.) .......................................................................... 5 II. SITUATION (Updated 091312)................................................................................. 7 A. POTENTIAL EMERGENCY CONDITIONS........................................................................................................... 7 B. HAZARD ANALYSIS (SUMMARY). .................................................................................................................... 7 C. VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS. ............................................................................................................................. 8 D. PERSONS WITH ACCESS AND FUNCTIONAL NEEDS. ....................................................................................... 8 E. TOWN OF PALM BEACH ECONOMIC PROFILE. ............................................................................................... 9 F. TOWN OVERVIEW/DEMOGRAPHICS. ........................................................................................................... 10 G. TOWN OF PALM BEACH MAP....................................................................................................................... 12 III. CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS.................................................................................... 13 A. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PHASES. ....................................................................................... 13 B. NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NIMS)................................................................................. 14 C. TOWN OF PALM BEACH EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION. ..................................................... 15 D. EMERGENCY AUTHORITIES........................................................................................................................... 16 E. CONTINUITY OF GOVERNMENT. .................................................................................................................. 17 F. INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEM (ICS). ........................................................................................................... 17 G. INCIDENT RESPONSE LEVELS (LEVELS OF DISASTER).................................................................................... 18 H. DIRECTION AND CONTROL. .......................................................................................................................... 19 I. EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER – ACTIVATION. ..................................................................................... 20 J. EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (EOC): ORGANIZATION, OPERATIONS AND STAFFING......................... 22 K. FACILITIES. .................................................................................................................................................... 26 L. ALERT AND WARNING.................................................................................................................................. 27 M. EMERGENCY PROCLAMATION, REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE AND RESOURCE REQUESTS............................. 31 N. PUBLIC PROTECTION: EVACUATION AND SHELTER...................................................................................... 33 O. RECOVERY FRAMEWORK.............................................................................................................................. 37 P. PALM BEACH COUNTY EOC. ......................................................................................................................... 39 Q. STATE OF FLORIDA RESPONSE...................................................................................................................... 40 R. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE............................................................................................................. 40 IV. RESPONSIBILITIES................................................................................................. 43 A. GENERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES. ......................................................................... 43 B. GENERAL PREPAREDNESS RESPONSIBILITIES. .............................................................................................. 44 Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) iii November 2012 Town of Palm Beach, TABLE OF CONTENTS Florida C. GENERAL RESPONSE RESPONSIBILITIES. ...................................................................................................... 44 V. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.....................................................................................45 A. GENERAL....................................................................................................................................................... 45 B. POLICIES. ...................................................................................................................................................... 45 C. ADMINISTRATION......................................................................................................................................... 45 D. FISCAL........................................................................................................................................................... 46 E. LOGISTICS. .................................................................................................................................................... 47 F. INSURANCE................................................................................................................................................... 48 VI. ATTACHMENTS......................................................................................................49 A. GLOSSARY OF TERMS, ACRONYMS............................................................................................................... 49 ANNEX I: MITIGATION. ..................................................................... Annex I A. GENERAL......................................................................................................................................................... 1 B. POLICY. ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 C. SUMMARY OF TOWN GENERAL MITIGATION PROGRAMS AND ................................................................... 2 DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES. D. REFERENCES. .................................................................................................................................................. 5 ANNEX II: PREPAREDNESS................................................................ Annex II
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SEPTEMBER 11Th: ART LOSS, DAMAGE, and REPERCUSSIONS Proceedings of an IFAR Symposium
    International Foundation for Art Research (IFAR) www.ifar.org This article may not be published or printed elsewhere without the express permission of IFAR. SEPTEMBER 11th: ART LOSS, DAMAGE, AND REPERCUSSIONS Proceedings of an IFAR Symposium SPEAKERS • Saul S. Wenegrat: Art Consultant; Former • Dietrich von Frank: President and CEO, AXA Art Director, Art Program, Port Authority of NY and NJ Insurance Corporation • Elyn Zimmerman: Sculptor (World Trade Center • Gregory J. Smith: Insurance Adjuster; Director, Memorial, 1993) Cunningham Lindsey International • Moukhtar Kocache: Director, Visual and Media Arts, • John Haworth: Director, George Gustav Heye Center, Lower Manhattan Cultural Council Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian • Suzanne F.W. Lemakis: Vice President and Art • Lawrence L. Reger: President, Heritage Preservation, Curator, Citigroup Heritage Emergency National Task Force IFAR SYMPOSIUM: THE ART LOST & DAMAGED ON 9/11 INTRODUCTION SHARON FLESCHER* Five months have passed since the horrific day in September that took so many lives and destroyed our sense of invulner- ability, if we were ever foolish enough to have had it in the first place. In the immediate aftermath, all we could think about was the incredible loss of life, but as we now know, there was also extensive loss of art—an estimated $100 mil- lion loss in public art and an untold amount in private and corporate collections. In addition, the tragedy impacted the art world in myriad other ways, from the precipitous drop in museum attendance, to the dislocation of downtown artists’ Left to right: Sharon Flescher, Saul S. Wenegrat, Elyn studios and arts organizations, to the decrease in philan- Zimmerman, Moukhtar Kocache, and Suzanne F.
    [Show full text]
  • Save Outdoor Sculpture!
    Save Outdoor Sculpture! . A Survey of Sculpture in Vtrginia Compiled by Sarah Shields Driggs with John L. Orrock J ' Save Outdoor Sculpture! A Survey of Sculpture in Virginia Compiled by Sarah Shields Driggs with John L. Orrock SAVE OUTDOOR SCULPTURE Table of Contents Virginia Save Outdoor Sculpture! by Sarah Shields Driggs . I Confederate Monuments by Gaines M Foster . 3 An Embarrassment of Riches: Virginia's Sculpture by Richard Guy Wilson . 5 Why Adopt A Monument? by Richard K Kneipper . 7 List of Sculpture in Vrrginia . 9 List ofVolunteers . 35 Copyright Vuginia Department of Historic Resources Richmond, Vrrginia 1996 Save Outdoor Sculpture!, was designed and SOS! is a project of the National Museum of American Art, Smithsonian Institution, and the National prepared for publication by Grace Ng Institute for the Conservation of Cultural Property. SOS! is supported by major contributions from Office of Graphic Communications the Pew Charitable Trusts, the Getty Grant Program and the Henry Luce Foundation. Additional assis­ Virginia Department of General Services tance has been provided by the National Endowment for the Arts, Ogilvy Adams & Rinehart, Inc., TimeWarner Inc., the Contributing Membership of the Smithsonian National Associates Program and Cover illustration: ''Ligne Indeterminee'~ Norfolk. Members of its Board, as well as many other concerned individuals. (Photo by David Ha=rd) items like lawn ornaments or commercial signs, formed around the state, but more are needed. and museum collections, since curators would be By the fall of 1995, survey reports were Virginia SOS! expected to survey their own holdings. pouring in, and the results were engrossing. Not The definition was thoroughly analyzed at only were our tastes and priorities as a Common­ by Sarah Shields Driggs the workshops, but gradually the DHR staff wealth being examined, but each individual sur­ reached the conclusion that it was best to allow veyor's forms were telling us what they had dis~ volunteers to survey whatever caught their eye.
    [Show full text]
  • Commemorative Works Catalog
    DRAFT Commemorative Works by Proposed Theme for Public Comment February 18, 2010 Note: This database is part of a joint study, Washington as Commemoration, by the National Capital Planning Commission and the National Park Service. Contact Lucy Kempf (NCPC) for more information: 202-482-7257 or [email protected]. CURRENT DATABASE This DRAFT working database includes major and many minor statues, monuments, memorials, plaques, landscapes, and gardens located on federal land in Washington, DC. Most are located on National Park Service lands and were established by separate acts of Congress. The authorization law is available upon request. The database can be mapped in GIS for spatial analysis. Many other works contribute to the capital's commemorative landscape. A Supplementary Database, found at the end of this list, includes selected works: -- Within interior courtyards of federal buildings; -- On federal land in the National Capital Region; -- Within cemeteries; -- On District of Columbia lands, private land, and land outside of embassies; -- On land belonging to universities and religious institutions -- That were authorized but never built Explanation of Database Fields: A. Lists the subject of commemoration (person, event, group, concept, etc.) and the title of the work. Alphabetized by Major Themes ("Achievement…", "America…," etc.). B. Provides address or other location information, such as building or park name. C. Descriptions of subject may include details surrounding the commemorated event or the contributions of the group or individual being commemorated. The purpose may include information about why the commemoration was established, such as a symbolic gesture or event. D. Identifies the type of land where the commemoration is located such as public, private, religious, academic; federal/local; and management agency.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iconography of Oregon's Twentieth-Century Utopian Myth
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 5-3-1995 From Promised Lands to Promised Landfill: The Iconography of Oregon's Twentieth-Century Utopian Myth Jeffry Lloyd Uecker Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the History Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Uecker, Jeffry Lloyd, "From Promised Lands to Promised Landfill: The Iconography of Oregon's Twentieth- Century Utopian Myth" (1995). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5026. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.6902 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. THESIS APPROVAL The abstract and thesis of Jeffry Lloyd Uecker for the Master of Arts in History were presented May 3, 1995, and accepted by the thesis committee and the department. COMMITTEE APPROVALS: Lisa Andrus-Rivera Representative of the Office of Graduate Studie DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: David A. Johns Department of .L. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ACCEPTED FOR PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY BY THE LIBRARY By ont.f!G ~4= .,,K/9S- ABSTRACT An abstract of the thesis of Jeffry Lloyd Uecker for the Master of Arts in History presented May 3, 1995. Title: From Promised Land to Promised Landfill: The Iconography of Oregon's Twentieth-Century Utopian Myth The state of Oregon often has been viewed as a utopia. Figures of speech borrowed from the romantic sublime, biblical pilgrimage, economic boosterism, and millenialist fatalism have been used to characterize it.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Public of Variety a Includes Brochure *This % Friday
    CL HQ DU Michael T. Hensley, Outside In Mural In Outside Hensley, T. Michael Esplanade Eastbank Katz Vera the along RIGGA, , Gate Echo , at Central Library Central at , Stair Garden Kirkland, Larry CN ! GL , at the Portland Center for the Performing Arts Performing the for Center Portland the at , Bollards Folly Otani, Valerie Park Waterfront McCall Tom , Shift River Gregoire, Mathieu in the North Park Blocks Park North the in Bao Bao Xi'an & Tung Da as well. as artworks commissioned by other agencies agencies other by commissioned artworks *This brochure includes a variety of public public of variety a includes brochure *This % Friday. through Monday 8:00-6:00, are IL GQ CN Manuel Izquierdo, Izquierdo, Manuel Ilan Averbuch, Ilan Averbuch, Dana LynnLouis, James Carpenter, Portland Building at 1120 SW 5th. Hours 5th. SW 1120 at Building Portland Art Gallery on the second floor of the of floor second the on Gallery Art www.racc.org/publicart or visit the Public the visit or www.racc.org/publicart Terra Incognita to go collection, the about more out Spectral Dome Light Metabolic Shift Metabolic Dreamer leading Percent-for-Art programs.* To find To programs.* Percent-for-Art leading County, and manages one of the country’s the of one manages and County, , Pettygrove Park , Pettygrove , Rose Quarter , Rose Multnomah and Portland of City the for art , Pearl District commissions and maintains public maintains and commissions (RACC) , PCPA Regional Arts & Culture Council Culture & Arts Regional The P ORTLAND C ULTURAL T OURS EN J. Seward Johnson, Allow Me, in Pioneer Courthouse Square.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimalist Sculpture: the Consequences of Artifice
    Minimalist Sculpture: The Consequences of Artifice. John Edward Penny Submitted in accordance with the requirements of PhD. The University of Leeds Department of Fine Art August 2002 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own work and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. IMAGING SERVICES NORTH Boston Spa, Wetherby West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ www.bl,uk TEXT CUT OFF IN THE ORIGINAL Abstract. This study, "Minimalist Sculpture: The Consequences of Artifice", was initially prompted by the wish to examine the case for a materialist approach to modern sculpture. Such an inquiry needed to address not only the substantiality of material and its process, but also the formative role of ideology on those choices of governing materials and procedures. The crux of this study began as, and remains, an inquiry into physical presence, and, by extension, the idea that Minimalist sculpture somehow returns the viewer to the viewer. At the core of any materialist position is the certainty that experience contains an element of passivity. If nothing exists but matter and its movements and modifications, then consciousness and volition depend entirely on material agency. The hierarchy of such a scheme underpins the socio-economic and cultural level with that of the biological, and, in turn, the biological with the physical. However, perception is not a matter of automatically recording external stimuli, but requires active elaboration. A hermeneutic process, therefore, is not one of unbridled pure thought; rather, it requires the recognition of an external and constant measure that gives form to thought.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10900 OMB No. 10240018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name Allegheny Commons other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number Roughly bounded by North Ave., Cedar Ave., Stockton St., Ridge not for publication N/A Ave., Brighton Rd. city or town Pittsburgh City Vicinity N/A state Pennsylvania code PA county Allegheny code 003 zip code 15212 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide local Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Acrobat Distiller, Job 59
    INTERPETING CITY IDENTITY THROUGH THE MEDIUM OF THE STREET by LAURA L. KRAUL BBA, The University of Michigan, 1980 MBA, The University of Michigan, 1983 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2002 2002 Laura L. Kraul All Rights Reserved INTERPETING CITY IDENTITY THROUGH THE MEDIUM OF THE STREET by LAURA L. KRAUL Approved: Major Professor: Mary Anne Akers Committee: Ian Firth Deborah Martin Paul Kelman Electronic Version Approved: Gordhan L. Patel Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2002 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my Major Professor, Mary Anne Akers, and the members of my Reading Committee, Ian Firth, Deb Martin and Paul Kelman for their guidance and advice given for this thesis. I especially want to thank my husband Douglas for his support and encouragement during my graduate years at UGA. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................................iv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................1 2 IDENTITY, IMAGE AND PLACE................................................................................................5 Review of Literature...............................................................................................................5 Synthesis
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Public
    Norman Taylor Michihiro Kosuge Patti Warashina Kvinneakt John Buck Continuation City Reflections 1975 bronze Lodge Grass Lee Kelly Fernanda D’Agostino (5 artworks) 2009 bronze 2000 bronze Untitled fountain TRANSIT MALL Murals, fountains, abstract Urban Hydrology 2009 granite 1977 and representational works — many created by local artists A GUIDE TO (12 artworks) stainless steel 2009 carved granite — grace downtown Portland’s Transit Mall (Southwest Fifth and Sixth avenues). Many pieces from the original collection, Tom Hardy Bruce West installed in the 1970s, were resited in 2009 along the new MAX Running Horses Untitled PORTLAND 1986 bronze 1977 light rail and car lanes. At that time, 14 new works were added. SW 6th Ave stainless steel SW Broadway PUBLIC MAX light Artwork Artworks with 20 rail stop multiple pieces N SW College St 18 SW Hall St SW 5th Ave Melvin Schuler ART 19 Thor SW Harrison St 1977 copper on redwood Daniel Duford The Legend of SW Montgomery St Mel Katz the Green Man SW Mill St Daddy Long of Portland Legs James Lee (10 artworks along Malia Jensen 2006 painted Hansen Robert Hanson 5th and 6th) 2009 SW Market St 21 Pile aluminum Talos No. 2 Untitled bronze, cast concrete, SW Clay St 2009 bronze 1977 bronze Bruce Conkle (7 artworks) porcelain enamel Burls Will Be Burls 2009 etched on steel 26 (3 artworks) bronze 2009 bronze, SW Columbia St 22 cast concrete SW Jefferson St 25 SW Madison St 27 23 SW Main St Anne Storrs and 28 almon St Kim Stafford 24 SW S 32 Begin Again Corner 2009 etched granite SW Taylor St 29 33 30 SW
    [Show full text]
  • City Hall Conservation Management Plan Adopted 12 August 2008
    The City of Newcastle Management Plan City Hall Conservation Management Plan Adopted 12 August 2008 PO Box 489 (282 King Street) NEWCASTLE NSW 2300 Ph 02 4974 2000 Fax 02 4974 2222 Email [email protected] www.newcastle.nsw.gov.au NEWCASTLE CITY HALL CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared for Newcastle City Council Final Draft April 2008 NEWCASTLE CITY HALL CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared for Newcastle City Council Final Draft April 2008 Mary Knaggs Government Architect’s Office, Department of Commerce McKell Building, Level 19 2-24 Rawson Place SYDNEY 2000 T: 61 2 9372 8394 F: 61 2 9372 8444 W: www.govarch.commerce.nsw.gov.au NSW Dept. of Commerce Report Number: 08042 GAO Heritage Group Revised Draft 17 April 2008 Preface Lord Mayor of Newcastle Newcastle City Hall Preface Conservation Management Plan GAO Heritage Group Revised Draft 17 April 2008 CONTENTS PART 1 THE CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN PREFACE (Lord Mayor of Newcastle) 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 AIMS OF THE STUDY..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 LAYOUT OF THIS CMP .................................................................................................. 1 1.4 SITE DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Landmark Study
    Seattle center Historic Landmark study March 2013 Publishing Data Roster Program Category #41 This report Commissioned by the City of Seattle, Seattle Center Redevelopment Department Published March 2013 cover image: 1962 postcard of the interior of keyarena. source: seattle Public Library. Project Team Artifacts Consulting, Inc. and HistoryLink.org undertook as partners preparation of this report. Michael Sullivan served as principal-in-charge with Marie McCaffrey pro- viding project visioning. Historians Paula Becker and Alan Stein developed the site context and property specific histories and document review. Paula Becker conducted archival research and assisted with site visits assessing the site and buildings to understand significance and changes over time. Architectural historians Katie Chase and Susan Johnson developed property specific physical descrip- tions, character-defining feature identification, and chro- nologies of alterations, as well as participating in field work and archival research. Katie Chase developed the report layout and production. Spencer Howard served as project manager providing project coordination, assisting in archival research, project meetings, field work, map- ping, and report development. iii 1962 image of the Playhouse lobby. source: university of Washington special collections. table of contentS Executive Summary 1 Methodology 3 Context Synopsis 5 Assessment 13 Findings 59 v 2013 view of the Exhibition Hall which houses the Pacific northwest Ballet. source: artifacts consulting, inc. liSt of tableS & figureS Glossary of Current vs Historic Building Names ix Project Area Map 2 Listed Properties Table 13 Inventoried Properties Table 15 Landmark Criteria Table 60 Landmarks Eligibility Map 62 Community Open Space Map 64 vii 2013 view of James Fitzgerald Fountain of the northwest.
    [Show full text]
  • Trimet MAX Green Line Public Art Guide
    TriMet MAX GREEN LINE PUBLIC ART GUIDE TriMet MAX Green Line 1 I-205 MAX Stations Christine Bourdette Public Art 6th 5th Cairns, 2008 Podcast available at trimet.org Don Merkt 28 Driver’s Seat, 1994 2 Gateway Portland Transit Mall Glisan Daniel Duford 27 5 The Green Man of Portland, MAX station 4th 2009 Bruce Conkle # New work Burls Will Be Burls, 2009 Broadway Everett Muliple-part work 3 John Killmaster Davis # Original collection Untitled, 1977 Anne Storrs 1 SE Main St Tall and Fallen, 2009 Lee Kelly 26 Couch # On loan Untitled Fountain, 1977 4 Ivan Morrison Burnside Untitled, 1977 25 Carolyn Law 2 SE Division St Ash 5 Sky to Earth, 2009 John Buck Mark R. Smith Lodge Grass, 2000 Pine Reading the Street, 2008 Valerie Otani 3 SE Powell Blvd James Lee Hansen 24 Talos No. 2, 1977 Oak Money Tree, 2009 Stark 6 23 Suzanne Lee 4 SE Holgate Blvd Bruce West 22 Mark Calderon Shared Vision, 2009 Mel Katz Untitled, 1977 Washington Floribunda, 1998 Daddy Long Legs, 2006 7 Alder Don Wilson M Interlocking Forms, 1977 21 Morrison Brian Borrello 5 Lents Town Center/ Malia Jensen 8 Lents Hybrids, 2009 SE Foster Rd Norman Taylor 20 Pile, 2009 Yamhill Kvinneakt, 1975 Cris Bruch Whistlestop for an Taylor Organ Teacher, 2009 Melvin Schuler 19 Brian Borrello 6 SE Flavel St Salmon Johnson Creek Watershed, 2009 Thor, 1977 9 Kathleen McCullough James Lee Hansen 18 Main Cat in Repose, 1977 Winter Rider No. 2, 2003 10 Georgia Gerber Madison J Animals in Pools, 1986 11 17 Jefferson Pete Beeman 7 SE Fuller Rd Patti Warashina Rick Bartow Waving Post, 2009 City Reflections, 2009 Columbia The Responsibility of Raising a Child, 2004 Clay 12 Tom Hardy 16 Chris Gander Running Horses, 1986 Market Puzzle Tower I, 2007 Mill Montgomery 15 13 Robert Maki Richard C.
    [Show full text]