DOCSLIB.ORG

Sea2sea" Under the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sea2sea Feasibility Analysis and evaluation of the viability of multimodal corridor of the approved Action "Sea2Sea" under the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) 2nd Deliverable - D2 Design of the Sea2Sea Corridor December 2014 ADK | AKKT | EVIAM | Milionis-Iliopoulou ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΣ ΜΗΛΙΩΝΗΣ - ΚΩΣΤΟΥΛΑ ΗΛΙΟΠΟΥΛΟΥ *The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the author. The European Union is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Feasibility Analysis and evaluation of the viability of multimodal corridor of the approved Action "Sea2Sea" under the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) - Deliverable D2 - Design of the Corridor TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Identification of necessary improvements ......................................................................................... 11 1.1 Identification of necessary improvements along the corridor ................................................... 11 1.1.1 Key components of the approach for planning the Sea2Sea corridor ................................ 11 1.2 Concept of improvement projects synthesis and action plan .................................................... 16 1.2.1 Stage 1 of Aegean-Black Sea2Sea corridor implementation .............................................. 16 1.2.2 Stage 2 of Aegean-Black Sea2Sea corridor implementation .............................................. 19 1.2.3 Stage 3 of Aegean-Black Sea2Sea corridor implementation .............................................. 20 1.2.4 Stage 4 of Aegean-Black Sea2Sea corridor implementation .............................................. 20 1.2.5 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 22 1.3 Environmental consideration ...................................................................................................... 24 1.3.1 General information - Greece ............................................................................................ 24 1.3.2 Section 1 - Kavala Alexandroupolis - Protected Areas along the studied corridor and its improvements ..................................................................................................................................... 26 1.3.3 Section 2 - Alexandroupolis - Ormenio - Protected Areas along the studied corridor and its improvements ..................................................................................................................................... 37 1.3.4 Summary data - conclusions ............................................................................................... 45 1.3.5 General information - Bulgaria ........................................................................................... 47 1.3.6 Section 1 - Svilengrad - Provdiv Protected Areas along the studied corridor and its improvements ..................................................................................................................................... 50 1.3.7 Section 2 - Provdiv - Stara Zagora - Protected Areas along the studied corridor and its improvements ..................................................................................................................................... 56 1.3.8 Section 3 - Stara Zagora - Burgas- Protected Area along the studied corridor and its improvements ..................................................................................................................................... 58 1.3.9 Section 4 - Stara Zagora - Varna Protected Areas along the studied corridor and that improvements ..................................................................................................................................... 64 1.3.10 Section 5 - Gorna Orjahovica - Ruse Protected Areas along the studied corridor and its improvements ..................................................................................................................................... 78 1.3.11 Section 6 - Karnobat - Sindel - Protected Areas along the studied corridor and its improvements ..................................................................................................................................... 79 1.3.12 Summary data - conclusions ............................................................................................... 83 ΑDΚ | AKKT | ΕVΙΑΜ | Millionis-Iliopouou 2 Feasibility Analysis and evaluation of the viability of multimodal corridor of the approved Action "Sea2Sea" under the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) - Deliverable D2 - Design of the Corridor 2 Formulation of improvement project mix and action plan ................................................................ 88 2.1 Administrative and preparatory actions ..................................................................................... 88 2.2 Scheduling of interventions ........................................................................................................ 90 2.2.1 Stage 1 - Improvement of the Alexandroupolis – Ormenio railway line ............................ 91 2.2.2 Stage 1 - Implementation of ERTMS ................................................................................... 96 2.2.3 Stage 1 - Implementation of SEA2SEA Traffic Control Center .......................................... 100 2.2.4 Stage 2 - Rehabilitation of the Plovdiv – Burgas railway line ............................................ 103 2.2.5 Stage 3 – Doubling and electrification of the Karnobat – Sindel railway line ................... 107 2.2.6 Stage 4 – Rail connection of the new port of Kavala ........................................................ 110 2.2.7 Stage 4 – Restoration of design parameters of the Ruse-Varna railway line ................... 114 2.2.8 Stage 4 – Improvement of the Ruse – Stara Zagora rail line............................................. 117 2.2.9 Stage 4 – Ruse Regional Intermodal Terminal .................................................................. 121 2.3 Comments and conclusions ...................................................................................................... 123 3 Assessment of the corridor's future competitiveness and freight flows .......................................... 125 3.1 Environmental Competitiveness Analysis ................................................................................. 125 3.1.1 General .............................................................................................................................. 125 3.1.2 Examined Scenarios .......................................................................................................... 125 3.1.3 Areas of protection for Scenario A .................................................................................... 127 3.1.4 Areas of protection for Scenario B .................................................................................... 142 3.1.5 Results comparison ........................................................................................................... 160 3.2 Flows Forecast........................................................................................................................... 165 3.2.1 The Model ......................................................................................................................... 165 3.2.2 The rail network ................................................................................................................ 173 3.2.3 The Shipping Lines ............................................................................................................. 173 3.2.4 Corridor forecasts ............................................................................................................. 179 3.2.5 The corridor as a whole..................................................................................................... 180 3.3 Economic Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 182 3.3.1 General .............................................................................................................................. 182 3.3.2 Investment costs ............................................................................................................... 182 ΑDΚ | AKKT | ΕVΙΑΜ | Millionis-Iliopouou 3 Feasibility Analysis and evaluation of the viability of multimodal corridor of the approved Action "Sea2Sea" under the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) - Deliverable D2 - Design of the Corridor 3.3.3 Forecast traffic .................................................................................................................. 183 3.3.4 Estimated revenue ............................................................................................................ 184 3.3.5 Forecast expenditures ....................................................................................................... 184 3.3.6 Estimated net revenue ...................................................................................................... 186 3.3.7 Forecast cash flows ........................................................................................................... 187 3.3.8 Additional Scenarios ......................................................................................................... 190 4 Preliminary assessment of the socioeconomic impact of the Corridor ............................................ 208 4.1 Preliminary assessment and evaluation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing Deliverable 3
    REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing Contract: GMA2-2001-52011 Funded by European Commission – DG TREN Fifth Framework Programme Competitive and Sustainable Growth Programme Key Action 2 – Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Deliverable 3 Case Studies Specification Version 2.0 Date: 9th March 2005 Authors: S. Suter and U. Springer (ECOPLAN), A. de Palma and R. Lindsey (adpC), S. van der Loo (KULeuven), A. Ricci and P. Fagiani (ISIS), P. Moilanen (STRAFICA), M. van der Hoofd and M. Carmona (TIS), J. Baker (TTR) with contributions from partners Project co-ordinator: ISIS (Italy) Partners: ISIS (It), ADPC (Be), CERAS (Fr), DIW (De), ECOPLAN (Ch), INFRAS (Ch), ITS (UK), IWW (De), KULeuven (Be), LETS (Fr), NEA (Nl), PW (Pl), STRAFICA (Fi), TIS (Pt), TOI (No), TTR (UK) REVENUE D3 CASE STUDIES SPECIFICATION Revenue Use from Transport Pricing Deliverable 3: Case Studies Specification Date: 9th March 2005 Authors: S. Suter and U. Springer (ECOPLAN), A. de Palma and R. Lindsey (adpC), S. van der Loo (KULeuven), A. Ricci and P. Fagiani (ISIS), P. Moilanen (STRAFICA), M. van der Hoofd and M. Carmona (TIS), J. Baker (TTR) This document should be referenced as: S. Suter, U. Springer, A. de Palma, R. Lindsey, S. van der Loo, A. Ricci, P. Fagiani, P. Moilanen, M. van der Hoofd, M. Carmona and J. Baker, (2004), Case Studies Specification, REVENUE Project Deliverable 3. Funded by 5th Framework RTD Programme, ISIS, Rome, 9th March 2005 PROJECT INFORMATION Contract: GMA2-2001-52011 Website: http://www.revenue-eu.org/ Commissioned by: European Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Translocations of European Ground Squirrel (Spermophilus Citellus) Along Altitudinal Gradient in Bulgaria – an Overview
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal Nature ConservationTranslocations 35: 63–95 of European (2019) ground squirrel (Spermophilus citellus) along altitudinal... 63 doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.35.30911 REVIEW ARTICLE http://natureconservation.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity conservation Translocations of European ground squirrel (Spermophilus citellus) along altitudinal gradient in Bulgaria – an overview Yordan Koshev1, Maria Kachamakova1, Simeon Arangelov2, Dimitar Ragyov1 1 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences; 1, Tzar Osvoboditel blvd.; 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria 2 Balkani Wildlife Society; 93, Evlogy and Hristo Georgievi blvd.; 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria Corresponding author: Yordan Koshev ([email protected]) Academic editor: Gabriel Ortega | Received 31 October 2018 | Accepted 15 May 2019 | Published 20 June 2019 http://zoobank.org/B16DBBA5-1B2C-491A-839B-A76CA3594DB6 Citation: Koshev Y, Kachamakova M, Arangelov S, Ragyov D (2019) Translocations of European ground squirrel (Spermophilus citellus) along altitudinal gradient in Bulgaria – an overview. Nature Conservation 35: 63–95. https://doi. org/10.3897/natureconservation.35.30911 Abstract The European ground squirrel (Spermophilus citellus) is a vulnerable species (IUCN) living in open habi- tats of Central and South-eastern Europe. Translocations (introductions, reintroductions and reinforce- ments) are commonly used as part of the European ground squirrel (EGS) conservation. There are numer- ous publications for such activities carried out in Central Europe, but data from South-eastern Europe, where translocations have also been implemented, are still scarce. The present study summarises the methodologies used in the translocations in Bulgaria and analyses the factors impacting their success. Eight translocations of more than 1730 individuals were performed in the period 2010 to 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Restoration of Forest Habitats in 10 Natura 2000 Sites in Bulgaria PDF 13.15 MB
    Project LIFE08 NAT/BG/000281 CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION OF FOREST HABITATS IN 10 NATURA 2000 SITES Conservation and Restoration of 11 Natura 2000 Riparian and Wetland Habitats in 10 SCI’s in Bulgarian Forests © Katerina Rakovska / WWF 1 PROJECT DATA PROJECT LIFE08 NAT/BG/000281 Conservation and Restoration of 11 Natura 2000 Riparian and Wetland Habitats in 10 SCI’s in Bulgarian Forests, LIFE08 NAT/BG/000281 www.wwf.bg/what_we_do/protected_areas/10parks/news CO-FUNDING: LIFE + Programme (EC financial instrument for the environment). DURATION: January 2010 - June 2014 PROJECT BUDGET: 1 236 834 €, of which 615 199 € EC co-funding PARTNERS: Executive Forestry Agency (EFA), WWF, 10 Nature Park Directorates: Bulgarka, Vitosha, Vrachanski Balkan, Zlatni Pyasatsi, Persina, Rilski Manastir, Rusenski Lom, Sinite Kamani, Strandhza, Shumensko Plato, Sofia Forest Seed-Control Station and Pazardzhik Poplar Station. 2 PROJECT GOALS The project goal was to local trees and shrubs. improve the conservation status Habitat quality improvement was of 10 Sites of Community planned through restoration of Importance (Natura 2000 sites) rare plant species characteristic managed by the Executive of the target habitats. Forestry Agency (EFA) through conservation and restoration of Bulgaria has limited experience 11 riparian and wetland habitats in management and restoration in forests. The total area of target of riverine and wetland habitats. habitats conserved or restored is The current project was an 21 000 ha. The intention was to opportunity to gain experience achieve the conservation of target and share the lessons learnt habitats through placement of through distribution of good specialised infrastructure (fences, practices for conservation and wooden grates, bridges, tourist restoration of habitats in sites spots) in order to restrict human managed by the EFA, which can impact (access of people and be used in other Natura 2000 vehicles).
    [Show full text]
  • For the Balkans and the People
    Issue 05 Financing for Pro-biodiversity For the Balkans and the people The project was presented at the October 2013 businesses Plum Festival in Troyan Monthly bulletin for the activities of “Linking nature conservation and rural development” Project In this issue: Page 1 Briefly for the activities in the issue ANNUAL BIODIVERSITY AWARDS Page 2 Briefly for the activities in the issue During the Annual biodiversity awards Page 3 Annual Biodiversity Awards ceremony, conducted on the Saturday afternoon Student camp For the Balkans Page 4 Farmers from the project region visiting Swiss farms of the 12 of October Her Excellency Mrs. Regina Financing for pro-biodiversity businesses Escher – the ambassador of the Swiss Стр.5 Festival of the local breeds in Kalofer Confederation to Bulgaria handed the traditional Стр.6 Training for PES PMB and visit of Bulgarka Park BBF awards to the winners from the 8 award Forthcoming events categories. Beside the symbolic bell medal the awarded persons received a check for 500 leva as well as presents from the Swiss embassy in The forthcoming signing of the contract for provision of In 2013 the Project For the Balkana and the people Bulgaria. The Annual biodiversity awards were funding for the approved project applications for the participated in the Festival, which took part on organized in the frame of the project “For the Program for support of pro-biodiversity business is September 27-29. The team presented to the Balkan and the people” funded by the Bulgarian scheduled for the beginning of November. “The citizens and guests of Troyan farmers products from Swiss Cooperation program.
    [Show full text]
  • Euro-Asian Transport Linkages Development
    Informal document No. 1 Distr.: General 20 January 2017 English only Economic Commission for Europe Inland Transport Committee Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics Group of Experts on Euro-Asian Transport Links Fifteenth session Yerevan, 31 January and 1 February 2017 Item 2 of the provisional agenda Identification of cargo flows on the Euro-Asian transport links Draft report of the phase III of the Euro-Asian Transport Links project Prepared by the "Scientific and Research Institute of Motor Transport" (NIIAT) Introduction 1. This document contains the draft final report of the phase III of the Euro-Asian Transport Links (EATL) project. It presents the results of the project’s phase III whose aim was to identify measures to make the overland EATL operational. 2. In particular, the report offers an overview and analysis of the existing situation in transport and trade along EATL routes, it reviews existing studies, programmes and initiatives on the development of EATL in the period 2013-2016, it identifies main transportation and trade obstacles in transport, trade, border-crossing, customs and transit along the EATL routes, and it formulates recommendations to overcome the identified obstacles as well as to further develop the trade across the EATL area. 3. This document is submitted to the fifteenth session of the Group of Experts on EATL for discussion and review. Informal document No. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EURO-ASIAN TRADE ROUTES AND FREIGHT FLOWS I.1. Economics and trade current situation in EATL Region I.1.1. General overview: world trade and economics I.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation Annual Report for 2014
    Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation Annual report for 2014 BULGARIAN BIODIVERSITY FOUNDATION ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2014 Sofia – Burgas, March 2015 1 Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation Annual report for 2014 I. CONTEXT FOR BBF WORK 2014 is defined by the economists as another lost year, when the economy started to improve, but politicians made it worse again. 2014 was extremely negative for Bulgaria - the year of political instability, suspended reforms, badly managed budget, deficit spending and bank crisis. And at the end of this critical year our loan rating was reduced to levels, we have not had even during the most severe recession in 2009- 2010. Many things have been known after the end of this year, but few lessons learned. For BBF 2014 started violently in defence of our favourite Strandja. A decision of the SAC and Ministry of Regional Development put on the agenda again one forgotten over the years problem – constructions in park areas. Protests against the adoption of the Master Plan of Tsarevo municipality were organised all over the country. We were very active and lead the protests in Sofia and Burgas. The issue about Strandja National Park Management Plan and our participation in it was again raised, this time even in Parliament and personally by the Minister of Environment and Water. We continued working on it, especially with Malko Tarnovo Municipality. At the same time Stefan Zlatarov, a Strandja NP Director of long standing, was forced to resign and his successor became Petko Nanchev. After the change the Directorate started slowly, but surely to regress. Maya Radeva, Balgarka NP manager, was controversially sacked, and an owner of a logging company was hired.
    [Show full text]
  • Heavy Metals and Arsenic in Soils from Grasslands in Bulgarka Nature Park D
    73 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 20 (No 1) 2014, 73-78 Agricultural Academy HEAVY METALS AND ARSENIC IN SOILS FROM GRASSLANDS IN BULGARKA NATURE PARK D. KARATOTEVA, E. TSVETKOVA and D. BEZLOVA University of Forestry, BG – 1714 Sofia, Bulgaria Abstract KARATOTEVA, D., E. TSVETKOVA and D. BEZLOVA, 2014. Heavy metals and arsenic in soils from grasslands in Bulgarka Nature Park. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 20: 73-78 In a recent study, we detected elevated content of heavy metals in medicinal plants and pasture grasses of Bulgarka Nature Park. In the present work, we have investigated the content of lead (Pb), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd) and mercury (Hg) in the soils of these grasslands. The highest concentrations were found in soils from the grassland in Malusha site. The mean value for Pb content was very high (183±141 mg.kg-1DW), while the value for As content was 78±18 mg.kg-1DW. Both elements ex- ceeded the maximum permitted level for grasslands. The maximum concentrations of Pb and As (497 mg.kg-1DW and 112 mg.kg-1DW, respectively) were detected only in the eastern part of the grassland of Malusha site. Thus, it is recommended to perform soil mapping and limit grazing within definite parts of the site. A source of risk to the environment could be consid- ered the enhanced soil levels of As in the grasslands of Ispolin Peak site (17-74 mg.kg-1 DW), the village Ezeroto (107 mg.kg- 1DW) and the grasslands near Gabrovo hut (43 mg.kg-1 DW). Key words: grassland, protected areas, maximum permitted level, risk assessment Abbreviations: nature park (NP), maximum permitted level (MPL) Introduction and part of the Central Balkan National Park (Malinova, 1997; Bezlova et al., 2001) have shown elevated content of The content of total forms of heavy metals in soils of for- As in the litter (up to 230 mg.kg-1) whereas total As content est lands in Bulgaria have been a subject of survey within the was up to 65 mg.kg-1, 80 µg.kg-1 of which being in a mobile network for large-scale and intensive monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Organisation for Co-Operation Between Railways (Osjd)
    ORGANISATION FOR CO-OPERATION BETWEEN RAILWAYS (OSJD) Организация сотрудничества железных дорог (ОСЖД) 铁 路 合 作 组 织 (铁 组) Organisation für die Zusammenarbeit der Eisenbahnen (OSShD) R E P O R T ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ORGANISATION FOR CO-OPERATION BETWEEN RAILWAYS FOR 2019 Members of OSJD As of 30 September 2019 The Countries and Railways - Members of OSJD Countries Railways/Authorities Republic of Azerbaijan AZD - Azerbaijani Railways CJSC Republic of Albania Islamic Republic of Afghanistan ARA - Afghanistan Railway Authority (ARA) Republic of Belarus BC - Byelorussian Railway Republic of Bulgaria BDZ - Holding “Bulgarian State Railways” Hungary MAV - CJSC “Hungarian State Railways” Socialist Republic of Vietnam VZD - Vietnamese Railway State Company Georgia GR - “Georgian Railway” JSC Islamic Republic of Iran RAI - Railway of the Islamic Republic of Iran Republic of Kazakhstan KZH - JSC “Kazakhstan Temir Zholy National Company” (Railway of Kazakhstan) People’s Republic of China KZD - State Department for Railways / China State Railway Group Со., Ltd. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) ZC - Railways of the People's Democratic Republic of Korea Republic of Korea KORAIL - Korea Railroad Corporation Republic of Cuba Kyrgyz Republic KRG - “Kyrgyz Temir Zholy National Enterprise” State Company (Kyrgyz Railway) Republic of Latvia LDZ - State JSC “Latvian Railway” (Latvijas dzelzceļš) Republic of Lithuania LTG - JSC “Lithuanian Railways” (AB “Lietuvos geležinkeliai“) Republic of Moldova CFM - State Enterprise “Railway of Moldova” Mongolia
    [Show full text]
  • Report by Institute of Viticulture and Enology, Pleven
    REPORT BY INSTITUTE OF VITICULTURE AND ENOLOGY, PLEVEN BY ACTIVITY 3.2.1 .: DESCRIPTION OF WINE GRAPE VARIETIES AND MICRO AREAS OF PRODUCTION IN THE HASKOVO AND KARDZHALI DISTRICTS OCTOBER, 2018 This report was prepared by a team of scientists from the Institute of Viticulture and Enology, Pleven, Bulgaria for the purpose of the project DIONYSOS. The analysis of the report uses own research; references to scientific literature in the field of viticulture, wine, history, geography, soil science, climate and tourism of bulgarian and world scientists; official statistics of NSI, MAFF, NIMH; officially published documents such as districts and municipalies development strategies in the districts of Haskovo and Kardzhali; the Law on Wine and Spirits of the Republic of Bulgaria; the Low of Tourism of the Republic of Bulgaria; official wine cellar websites, tourist information centers, travel agencies; and other sources. This document is created under the project “Developing identity on yield, soil and site”/DIONYSOS, Subsidy contract B2.6c.04/01.11.2017 with the financial support of Cooperation Programme “Interreg V-A Greece-Bulgaria” 2014-2020, Co- funded by the European Regional Development Fund and National funds of Greece and Bulgaria. The entire responsibility for the contents of the document rests with Institute of Viticulture and Enology-Pleven and under no circumstances it can be assumed that the materials and information on the document reflects the official view European Union and the Managing Authority Този документ е създаден в рамките на проект „Разработване на идентичност на добива, почвите и местностите“/ДИОНИСОС, Договор за субсидиране B2.6c.04/01.11.2017 който се осъществява с финансовата подкрепа на подкрепа на Програма за трансгранично сътрудничество ИНТЕРРЕГ V-A Гърция-България 2014-2020, съфинансирана от Европейския фонд за регионално развитие и от националните фондове на страните Гърция и България.
    [Show full text]
  • Tagne Avec Une Formation Générale D’Alpinisme
    La Bulgarie a toute la diversité de terrains et de paysages dont un passionné d‘aventure et d‘activités de plein air peut rêver. Des sommets de plus de 2900 mètres de haut, plus de 200 refuges et plus de 300 lacs d‘altitude, des rivières et DE LA MONTAGNE des canyons limpides, des milliers de kilomètres de sentiers balisés, un système développé d‘aires protégées et plus de 300 km de littoral. À LA MER TOURISME D’ AVENTURE TOURISME D TOURISME ’ AVENTURE Au printemps au rendez-vous le rafting, le kayak et le canyoning mais aussi le spectacle LA BULGARIE des grandes migrations d‘oiseaux et la collecte des roses. L’été est un moment propice aux randonnées dans les anciennes forêts et sur les grandes crêtes dénudées, à l’escalade, au vélo, EN QAUTRE et aux activités nautiques et aux sports aériens. L‘automne venu, période de vendange bien sûr, mais où nous nous retrouvons encore quelques semaines en haute montagne pour quelques SAISONS belles courses et randonnées. En hiver, avec l’arrivée de la neige que de mieux que le ski et le snowboard et les eaux thermales ? bulgariatravel.org 1 TOURISME D‘AVENTURE bulgariatravel.org 360mag.bg hiking-bulgaria.com stenata.com 2021 TOURISME D’AVENTURE EN BULGARIE - AIR - SOMMAIRE 74 PARAPENTE Sopot 75 SAUT EN PARACHUTE Montana - RUBRIQUES - 76 SAUT À L’ÉLASTIQUE 6 DE LA MER A LA MONTAGNE 77 MONTGOLFIÈRE QUATRE SAISONS 8 - MONTAGNES - - VÉLOTOURISME - 32 DIVERSITÉ NATURELLE 58 ITINÉRAIRES DESTINÉS AU VÉLO TOURISME ET VTT 34 REFUGES ET CENTRE DE SPORT EN MONTAGNE Rudopia Belmeken Itinéraire cyclable Trans
    [Show full text]
  • List of Numeric Codes for Railway Companies (RICS
    List of numeric codes for railway companies (RICS Code) contact : [email protected] reference : http://www.uic.org/spip.php?article311 code short name full name country request date allocation date modified date begin of validity end of validity recent Freight Passenger Infra- structure Holding Integrated Other url 0001 0002 0003 0004 0005 01/02/2011 0006 StL Holland Stena Line Holland BV Netherlands 01/07/2004 x http://www.stenaline.nl/ferry/ 0007 0008 0009 0010 VR VR-Yhtymä Oy Finland x http://www.vr.fi/fi/ 0011 0012 TF Transfesa Spain 10/09/2013 x http://www.transfesa.com/ 0013 OSJD OSJD Poland 12/07/2000 12/07/2000 x http://osjd.org/ 0014 CWL Compagnie des Wagons-Lits France x http://www.cwl-services.com/ 0015 RMF Rail Manche Finance United Kingdom x http://www.rmf.co.uk/ 0016 RD RAILDATA Switzerland x http://www.raildata.coop/ 0017 ENS European Night Services Ltd United Kingdom x 0018 THI Factory THI Factory SA Belgium 06/05/2005 06/05/2005 01/12/2014 x http://www.thalys.com/ 0019 Eurostar I Eurostar International Limited United Kingdom x http://www.eurostar.com/ 0020 OAO RZD Joint Stock Company 'Russian Railways' Russia 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://rzd.ru/ 0021 BC Belarusian Railways Belarus 11/09/2003 24/11/2004 x http://www.rw.by/ 0022 UZ Ukrainski Zaliznytsi Ukraine 15/01/2004 15/01/2004 x http://uz.gov.ua/ 0023 CFM Calea Ferată din Moldova Moldova x http://railway.md/ 0024 LG AB 'Lietuvos geležinkeliai' Lithuania 28/09/2004 24/11/2004 x http://www.litrail.lt/ 0025 LDZ Latvijas dzelzceļš Latvia 19/10/2004 24/11/2004 x http://www.ldz.lv/ 0026 EVR Aktsiaselts Eesti Raudtee Estonia x http://www.evr.ee/ 0027 KTZ Kazakhstan Temir Zholy Kazakhstan 17/05/2004 17/05/2004 x http://www.railway.ge/ 0028 GR Sakartvelos Rkinigza Georgia x http://railway.ge/ 0029 UTI Uzbekistan Temir Yullari Uzbekistan 17/05/2004 17/05/2004 x http://www.uzrailway.uz/ 0030 ZC Railways of D.P.R.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Reform in the ECE Region
    Railway Reform in the ECE region RAILWAY REFORM IN THE ECE REGION Final report New York and Geneva, 2018 Note The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ECE/TRANS/261 Copyright © United Nations, 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may, for sales purposes, be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from the United Nations. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION eISBN: 978-92-1-363117-1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Study on Railway Reform across the ECE region was prepared by the consultant Davide Ranghetti. It is based on desktop research and thanks to the kind contribution of speakers and delegates at the Workshop on Railway Reform held in conjunction with the seventy-first session of the Working Party on Rail Transport in November 2017, as well as speakers at previous session of SC.2, without whose commitment and input to this study would not have been possible. The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, as well as other experts also provided valuable input into the preparation of the document. Disclaimer: Views expressed in this document are of the consultant and of the participants of the Workshop on Railway Reform in the ECE region held in conjunction with the seventy-first session of the Working Party on Rail Transport.
    [Show full text]