1. Ground Cover. Botanical Name Asparagus Sprengeri Liex Cornuta Rotunda Juniperus Liriope Pyracantha Walderii 2. Evergreen Tree

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

1. Ground Cover. Botanical Name Asparagus Sprengeri Liex Cornuta Rotunda Juniperus Liriope Pyracantha Walderii 2. Evergreen Tree

Approved Plant List 1. Ground Cover. Botanical name Common Name Asparagus Sprengeri Asparagus Fern Liex Cornuta Rotunda Dwarf Holly Juniperus Various Juniper Ground Liriope Covers Lily Turf Pyracantha Walderii Walders Dwarf Pyracantha 2. Evergreen Trees. Botanical Name Common Name Cinnamomum Camphora Camphor Eriobotrya Japonica Loquat Tree Ligustrum Japonicum Wax Leaf Privet Ligustrum Lucidum Glossy Privet Magnolia Grandiflora Magnolia Magnolia Viginiana Sweet Bay Pinu Elliottiif Slash Pine Slash Pine 3. Palms. Botanical Name Common Name Livistona Chinensis Chinese Fan Palm Butia Capitata Pindo Palm Chamaerops Humilis European Fan Palm Sabal Palmetto Cabbage Palm Phoenix Robenimum Pigmy Date Palm Washingtonia Robusta Mexican Fan Falm Cycas Revoluta Sa 4. Shrubs. Botanical Name Common Name Raphiolepsis Indica Indian Hawthorne Cocculus Laurifolius Snail seed go Palm Cortaderia Selloana Pampas Grass Eleagnus Pungens Silverthorn Llex Burfordii Burford Holly Llex Vomitoria Yaupon Holly Juniperus Spp. Various Juniper Shrubs Glossy Ligustrum Lucidum Privet Mahonia Bealei Leatherleaf Mahonia Myrica Cerifera Wax Myrtle Nandina Domestica Heavenly Bamboo Amelia Walk – A Planned Community Architectural Planning Criteria – 4th Revision – December 22, 2015 Page | 16 Photinia Glabra Red Photinia Pittosporum Spp. Various Pittosporums Pyracantha Coccinea Firethorn Trachelospermum Jasminoides Confederate Jasmine Viburmum Odoratissimum Sweet Viburnum Viburnum Suspensum Sandankwa Viburnum Ilex crenata 'Compacta’ Compacta Holly 5. Shade Trees. Botanical Name Common Name Quercus Virginiana Live Oak Quercus Laurifolia Laurel Oak Acer Rubrum Red Maple Betula Nigra River Birch Cornus Dogwood 6. Ornamental Trees. Botanical Name Common Name Pyrus Calleryiana Bradford Pear Photinia Fraseri Tree Photinia (Red Tip) Ilex x ‘Nellie R. Stevens’ Nellie Stevens Holly Lagerstroemia Crape Myrtle Amelia Walk – A Planned Community Architectural Planning Criteria – 4th Revision – December 22, 2015 Page | 17 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Download Article (PDF)
Advances in Engineering Research, volume 170 7th International Conference on Energy and Environmental Protection (ICEEP 2018) Effects of water stress on the growth status of five species of shrubs Pingwei Xiang1,a, Xiaoli Ma1,b, Xuefeng Liu1,c, Xiangcheng Yuan1,d, Zhihua Fu2,e* 1Chongqing three gorges academy of agricultural sciences, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China 2Chongqing Three Gorges Vocational College, Wanzhou, Chongqing,China [email protected],[email protected],[email protected], [email protected],[email protected] *Corresponding author. Pingwei Xiang and Xiaoli Ma contributed equally to this work. Keywords: Water stress; shrubs; leaf relative water content; leaf water retention Abstract: A pot experiments were conducted to study the effects of water stress on plant Blade retention, leaf relative moisture content (LRWC), Morphology and growth status, five drought-resistant plants (Pyracantha angustifolia, Pyracantha fortuneana, Pyracantha fortuneana ‘Harlequin’, Ligustrum japonicum ‘Howardii’, Photinia glabra×Photinia serrulata ) were used as materials. The results showed that the drought resistant ability of five species of shrubs from strong to weak as follows: Ligustrum japonicum 'Howardii'，Pyracantha fortuneana ， Pyracantha angustifolia，Photinia glabra×Photinia serrulata，Pyracantha fortuneana 'Harlequin'. It was found with several Comprehensive indicators that the drought tolerance of Ligustrum japonicum 'Howardii' was significantly higher than that of the other four species, and its adaptability to water deficit was stronger,
[Show full text]
Devonian Plant Fossils a Window Into the Past
EPPC 2018 Sponsors Academic Partners PROGRAM & ABSTRACTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Scientific Committee: Zhe-kun Zhou Angelica Feurdean Jenny McElwain, Chair Tao Su Walter Finsinger Fraser Mitchell Lutz Kunzmann Graciela Gil Romera Paddy Orr Lisa Boucher Lyudmila Shumilovskikh Geoffrey Clayton Elizabeth Wheeler Walter Finsinger Matthew Parkes Evelyn Kustatscher Eniko Magyari Colin Kelleher Niall W. Paterson Konstantinos Panagiotopoulos Benjamin Bomfleur Benjamin Dietre Convenors: Matthew Pound Fabienne Marret-Davies Marco Vecoli Ulrich Salzmann Havandanda Ombashi Charles Wellman Wolfram M. Kürschner Jiri Kvacek Reed Wicander Heather Pardoe Ruth Stockey Hartmut Jäger Christopher Cleal Dieter Uhl Ellen Stolle Jiri Kvacek Maria Barbacka José Bienvenido Diez Ferrer Borja Cascales-Miñana Hans Kerp Friðgeir Grímsson José B. Diez Patricia Ryberg Christa-Charlotte Hofmann Xin Wang Dimitrios Velitzelos Reinhard Zetter Charilaos Yiotis Peta Hayes Jean Nicolas Haas Joseph D. White Fraser Mitchell Benjamin Dietre Jennifer C. McElwain Jenny McElwain Marie-José Gaillard Paul Kenrick Furong Li Christine Strullu-Derrien Graphic and Website Design: Ralph Fyfe Chris Berry Peter Lang Irina Delusina Margaret E. Collinson Tiiu Koff Andrew C. Scott Linnean Society Award Selection Panel: Elena Severova Barry Lomax Wuu Kuang Soh Carla J. Harper Phillip Jardine Eamon haughey Michael Krings Daniela Festi Amanda Porter Gar Rothwell Keith Bennett Kamila Kwasniewska Cindy V. Looy William Fletcher Claire M. Belcher Alistair Seddon Conference Organization: Jonathan P. Wilson
[Show full text]
(Rosaceae), I. Differentiation of Mespilus and Crataegus
Phytotaxa 257 (3): 201–229 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.3.1 STUDIES IN MESPILUS, CRATAEGUS, AND ×CRATAEMESPILUS (ROSACEAE), I. DIFFERENTIATION OF MESPILUS AND CRATAEGUS, EXPANSION OF ×CRATAEMESPILUS, WITH SUPPLEMENTARY OBSERVATIONS ON DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE CRATAEGUS AND AMELANCHIER CLADES JAMES B. PHIPPS Department of Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada; email: [email protected] Abstract The paper argues the position for retaining a monotypic Mespilus, i.e., in the sense of M. germanica, the medlar. Recent cladistic papers lend support for Mespilus being sister to Crataegus, and there is a clear morphological distinction from Cra- taegus, emphasized by adaptation to carnivore frugivory. Mespilus secured, the paper then treats each of the known hybrids between Mespilus and Crataegus, making the new combination Crataemespilus ×canescens (J.B. Phipps) J.B. Phipps. Keywords: Crataemespilus ×canescens (J.B. Phipps) J.B. Phipps comb. nov.; inflorescence position; medlar; Mespilus a folk-genus; Mespilus distinct from Crataegus; Rosaceae; taxonomic history of Mespilus Introduction The author has a long-standing interest in generic delimitation in the Maloid genera of the Rosaceae (Maleae Small, formerly Maloideae C. Weber, Pyrinae Dumort.), as shown particularly in a series of papers with K. Robertson, J. Rohrer, and P.G. Smith (Phipps et al. 1990, 1991; Robertson at al. 1991, 1992; Rohrer at al. 1991, 1994) which treated all 28 genera of Maleae as recognised by us. There is also a revisionary treatment of New World Heteromeles M.J.
[Show full text]
15. PHOTINIA Lindley, Trans. Linn. Soc. London 13: 96, 103. 1821.1 石楠属 Shi Nan Shu Lu Lingdi (陆玲娣 Lu Ling-Ti); Stephen A
Flora of China 9: 121–137. 2003. 15. PHOTINIA Lindley, Trans. Linn. Soc. London 13: 96, 103. 1821.1 石楠属 shi nan shu Lu Lingdi (陆玲娣 Lu Ling-ti); Stephen A. Spongberg Pourthiaea Decaisne. Trees or shrubs, deciduous or evergreen. Winter buds small; scales imbricate, few. Leaves alternate, simple, papery or leathery, venation camptodromous, margin serrate, rarely entire, shortly petiolate; stipules present, usually subulate. Inflorescences terminal, umbellate or corymbose, rarely shortly paniculate, many flowered, sometimes flowers 2- or 3-clustered or solitary. Hypanthium cupular or campanulate to cylindric, adnate to ovary or free near apex. Sepals 5, persistent, short. Petals 5, contorted or imbricate in bud, base clawed. Stamens usually ca. 20. Carpels 2–5, rarely 1; ovary semi-inferior, (1 or)2–5-loculed, in fruit free apically or to 1/3 length; styles (1 or)2–5, free or ± connate, short, dilated apically; stigmas truncate; ovules 2 per locule, erect. Fruit a pome, globose, ovoid, or ellipsoid, somewhat fleshy, (1- or)2–5-loculed, free from calyx only near apex or to 1/3 length, with persistent, incurved sepals; carpel crustaceous or membranous, each locule 1- or 2-seeded; seeds erect, testa leathery; cotyledons plano-convex. About 60 species: E, S, and SE Asia, also in Mexico; 43 species (32 endemic) in China. Wu Zhengyi (editor’s note) believes that Pourthiaea is morphologically distinct from Photinia and should be treated as a separate genus. Many species of Photinia are ornamental trees and shrubs with large lustrous leaves and attractive white flowers in the spring followed by red fruits in the autumn.
[Show full text]
Heteromeles Arbutifolia (Lindl.) M. Roemer NRCS CODE: Subfamily: Maloideae Family: Rosaceae (HEAR5) Photos: A
I. SPECIES Heteromeles arbutifolia (Lindl.) M. Roemer NRCS CODE: Subfamily: Maloideae Family: Rosaceae (HEAR5) photos: A. Montalvo Order: Rosales Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida Fruits (pomes) in late fall and winter. A. Subspecific taxa None recognized by Phipps (2012, 2016) in Jepson Manual or Jepson e-Flora. B. Synonyms Photinia arbutifolia (Ait.) Lindl.; Crataegus arbutifolia Ait. (McMinn 1939) Heteromeles (Lindl.) M. Roemer arbutifolia var. arbutifolia ; H. a. var. cerina (Jeps.) E. Murray; H. a. var. macrocarpa (Munz) Munz; H. salicifolia (C. Presl) Abrams (Phipps 2016) (but see I. F. Taxonomic issues). C. Common name toyon, California Christmas berry, California-holly (Painter 2016); Christmas berry (CalFlora 2016). D. Taxonomic relationships Phylogenetic analyses based on molecular and morphological data confirm thatPhotinia is the most closely related genus (Guo et al. 2011). Photinia differs in having 20 stamens, fused carpels, and stone cells in the testa as well as occurring in summer-wet environments (Phipps 1992). E. Related taxa in region None. There is only one species of Heteromeles. The closely related Photinia is primarily tropical (Meyer 2008) and not in California. Toyon's taxonomic stability may be in part related to its reproductive mode (Wells 1969). F. Taxonomic issues The three varieties of H. arbutifolia listed above in cell I. B. are currently recognized in the USDA PLANTS (2016) database. G. Other One of the most widely distributed California shrubs. Also widely planted and well-known for its bright red fruits in winter. McMinn (1939) noted it had been planted widely in parks and gardens since about 1914. From the Greek words 'heter' for different and 'malus' for apple (Munz 1974).
[Show full text]
Aronia Berries – What's Their Potential?
Aronia Berries – What’s Their Potential? By Jacqueline King, WSU – Mount Vernon Aronia (Aronia melanocarpa / Photinia melanocarpa), sometimes called black chokeberry, is a deciduous shrub native to eastern North America, used by landscapers primarily for its clusters of creamy white flowers in late spring, and colorful flame-colored autumn foliage contrasting with dark berries. The thick bushes grow to 6 to 8 feet in height, and are sometimes used as a windbreak in border plantings. Aronia requires a damp, acid soil with sufficient rain during the growing season. The pea-sized, violet-black berries are harvested in autumn. Berries have a strong, stable and natural color, with a dry and sour strong flavor. For those interested in a dual- purpose plant for edible landscaping, the recent introduction "Autumn Magic" from the University of British Columbia was selected for large fruit size, superior fall color and overall form. Aronia was well known to natives and early settlers, but has not been commercially cultivated in the U.S. since the turn of the century. However, in Denmark, eastern Europe and Russia (especially Siberia) the strongly colored, pungently flavored fruit is quite popular for juice and even wine production. Breeding programs there have produced fruiting clones that are highly productive, and amazingly uniform in berry size and quality. For the best fruit production, clones that have been selected for high yield should be chosen, rather than those intended for landscaping. Plants from these breeding lines, for example "Nero" and "Viking," are available from several specialist nurseries such as Raintree and One Green World.
[Show full text]
Controlling Entomosporium Leaf Spot on Woody Ornamentals
FARMING Controlling Entomosporium Leaf Spot on Woody Ornamentals ► Learn the best practices for inhibiting spread of this destructive disease, including recommended fungicides and rates for both commercial operations and home landscapes. Leaf spot, caused by Entomosporium maculatum, is a widespread and destructive disease of woody Bugwood.org Agricultural Center, Don Ferrin, Louisiana State University ornamentals in the rose family (Rosaceae). Red tip photinia and other photinia species along with Indian hawthorn are commonly damaged by Entomosporium leaf spot. Other hosts include loquat (Eriobotrya japonica), flowering and fruiting pear (Pyrus sp), firethorn (Pyracantha sp.), hawthorn (Crataegus rhipidophylla), Juneberry (Amelanchier sp.), and quince (Cydonia olonga). Entomosporium leaf spot typically damages plants in home landscapes and nurseries following periods of frequent rainfall in the spring and fall. Disease outbreaks Figure 2. Bright red leaf spotting associated with Entomosporium leaf spot on on Indian hawthorn also occur often in winter. Indian hawthorn. On heavily diseased leaves, the spots merge, forming Symptoms large, irregular blotches. Tiny black specks, fruiting Small circular, bright red spots on both the upper and bodies of the causal fungus, are often found in the lower surfaces of young expanding leaves are the ﬁrst center of each leaf spot (figure 3). symptoms of Entomosporium leaf spot. Large purple Spots similar to those on the leaves may develop on to maroon blotches, much darker than the surrounding leaf petioles and tender shoots. Light infections usually healthy tissue, may be found on heavily diseased young cause little more than cosmetic damage, while severe leaves of photinia (figure 1). On Indian hawthorn, these infections often result in early and heavy leaf drop blotches are bright red (figure 2).
[Show full text]
PLANT SCIENCE Bulletin Fall 2014 Volume 60 Number 3
PLANT SCIENCE Bulletin Fall 2014 Volume 60 Number 3 Scientists proudly state their profession! In This Issue.............. Botany 2014 in Boise: a fantastic The season of awards......p. 119 Rutgers University. combating event......p.114 plant blindness.....p. 159 From the Editor Reclaim the name: #Iamabotanist is the latest PLANT SCIENCE sensation on the internet! Well, perhaps this is a bit of BULLETIN an overstatement, but for those of us in the discipline, Editorial Committee it is a real ego boost and a bit of ground truthing. We do identify with our specialties and subdisciplines, Volume 60 but the overarching truth that we have in common Christopher Martine is that we are botanists! It is especially timely that (2014) in this issue we publish two articles directly relevant Department of Biology to reclaiming the name. “Reclaim” suggests that Bucknell University there was something very special in the past that Lewisburg, PA 17837 perhaps has lost its luster and value. A century ago [email protected] botany was a premier scientific discipline in the life sciences. It was taught in all the high schools and most colleges and universities. Leaders of the BSA Carolyn M. Wetzel were national leaders in science and many of them (2015) had their botanical roots in Cornell University, as Biology Department well documented by Ed Cobb in his article “Cornell Division of Health and University Celebrates its Botanical Roots.” While Natural Sciences Cornell is exemplary, many institutions throughout Holyoke Community College the country, and especially in the Midwest, were 303 Homestead Ave leading botany to a position of distinction in the Holyoke, MA 01040 development of U.S.
[Show full text]
Vascular Plants of Williamson County Photinia Serratifolia Var. Serratifolia − TAIWANESE PHOTINIA, CHINESE PHOTINIA [Rosaceae]
Vascular Plants of Williamson County Photinia serratifolia var. serratifolia − TAIWANESE PHOTINIA, CHINESE PHOTINIA [Rosaceae] Photinia serratifolia (Desf.) Kalkm. var. serratifolia, TAIWANESE PHOTINIA, CHINESE PHOTINIA. Shrub, evergreen, on some shoots spinescent (foliage), several-stemmed (trunks) at base, principal branches suberect to ascending, in range 120−600 cm tall; shoots with only cauline leaves, foliate tough and leathery (sclerophyllous), sometimes hollylike (Ilex) with spinose margins; stems when scratched emitting hydrogen cyanide (bitter almonds). Stems: initially cylindric with projecting leaf bases later developing a midridge from leaf base, glabrate to short-hairy and with inconspicuous glandular hairs, forming periderm at end of growing season lacking hairs, with prominent, smilelike leaf scars; on large stems with grayish brown, flaking bark like cherries (Prunus). Leaves: helically alternate, simple, petiolate, with stipules; stipules 2, wings attached to lower petiole, triangular to semicircular, 0.5−4 mm long, red to green, glabrous; petiole shallowly channeled, in range 4−33 mm long, green aging dull, sometimes with several low teeth along upper ridges, short-hairy on upper side aging with early periderm; blade elliptic to obovate-elliptic, in range 50−125 × 25−53 mm, tapered to broadly tapered at base, serrate to spine-serrate and often wavy on margins, acute at tip, pinnately veined with midrib slightly sunken on upper surface and raised on lower surface, minor vein ending in each tooth or spine with tip to 2 mm long often whitish and sometimes reddish purple point (with minute hairs), surfaces initially with short hairs aging with some hairs persistent along midrib, lower surface aging with hairy only near margins or also along midrib.
[Show full text]
A Brief Review of the Fossil History of the Family Rosaceae with a Focus On
Pl. Syst. Evol. 266: 45–57 (2007) Plant Systematics DOI 10.1007/s00606-007-0540-3 and Evolution Printed in The Netherlands A brief review of the fossil history of the family Rosaceae with a focus on the Eocene Okanogan Highlands of eastern Washington State, USA, and British Columbia, Canada M. L. DeVore1 and K. B. Pigg2 1Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Georgia College & State University, Milledgeville, GA, USA 2School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Received January 16, 2006; accepted August 17, 2006 Published online: June 28, 2007 Ó Springer-Verlag 2007 Abstract. Many of the oldest definitive members of temperate regions (Heywood 1993). Members the Rosaceae are present in the Eocene upland floras of the Rosaceae have radiated into a wide of the Okanogan Highlands of northeastern Wash- variety of environments ranging from mesic to ington State and British Columbia, Canada. Over a xeric communities and are elements of boreal dozen rosaceous taxa representing extant and extinct and tundra ecosystems. No doubt one of the genera of all four traditionally recognized subfam- driving forces for the Rosaceae’s success is the ilies are known from flowers, fruits, wood, pollen, presence of agamospermy, hybridization, poly- and especially leaves. The complexity seen in Eocene Rosaceae suggests that hybridization and poly- ploidy and vegetative reproduction within the ploidy may have played a pivotal role in the early family. All of these microevolutionary pro- evolution of the family. Increased species diversity cesses contribute to generating novel genetic and the first appearance of additional modern taxa combinations capable of colonizing and per- occur during the Late Paleogene in North America sisting in new, open habitats.
[Show full text]
Seeds and Plants Imported
Issued March 30, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. BUREAU OF PLANT INDUSTRY. WILLIAM A. TAYLOR, Chitf of Bureau. INVENTORY OF SEEDS AND PLANTS IMPORTED BY THE OFFICE OF FOREIGN SEED AND PLANT INTRODUCTION DURING THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 1 TO JUKE 30, 1915. (No. 43; Nos. 40389 TO 40895.) WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING CPPIOE. Issued March 30,1918. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. BUREAU OF PLANT INDUSTRY. WILLIAM A. TAYLOR, Chief of Bureau. INVENTORY OF SEEDS AND PUNTS IMPORTED OFFICE OF FOREIGN SEED AND PLANT INTRODUCTION DURING THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 1 TO JUNE 30, 1915. (No. 43; Nos. 40389 TO 40895. ) WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING CFFIOE, 191& BUREAU OF PLANT INDUSTRY. Chief of Bureau, WILLIAM A. TAYLOR. Associate Chief of Bureau, KARL F. KBLLERMAN. Officer in Charge of Publications, J. E. ROCKWELL. Chief Cleric, JAMBS E. JONES. FOREIGN SEED AND PLANT INTRODUCTION. SCIENTIFIC STAFF. David Fairchild, Agricultural Explorer in Charge. P. H. Dorsett, Plant Introducer, in Charge of Plant Introduction Field Stations. B. T. Galloway, Plant Pathologist, in Charge of Plant Protection and Plant Propagation. Peter Bisset, Plant Introducer, in Charge of Foreign Plant Distribution. Frank N. Meyer, Wilson Popenoe, and F. C. Reimer, Agricultural Explorers. H. C. Skeels, S. C. Stuntz, and R. A. Young, Botanical Assistants. D. A. Bisset, R. N. Jones, P. G. Russell, and Glen P. Van Eseltine, Assistants. Robert L. Beagles, Superintendent, Plant Introduction Field Station, Chico, Cal. E. O. Orpet, Assistant in Plant Introduction, Chico, Cal. Edward Simmonds, Superintendent, Plant Introduction Field Station, Miami, Fla. John M. Rankin, Superintendent, Yarrow Plant Introduction Field Station, Rockville, Md.
[Show full text]
Plant Palette for the Town of Camp Verde, Arizona a Tree City USA Since 2014
Suggested Plant Palette For the Town of Camp Verde, Arizona A Tree City USA Since 2014 Second Edition 2020 Compiled by The Camp Verde Tree Advisory Committee Plant Palette for the Town of Camp Verde Second Edition- 2020 Plant Palette for the Town of Camp Verde Second Edition- 2020 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION THE RIGHT PLANT IN THE RIGHT PLACE FLOWERS 2 ANGELITA DAISY (TETRANEURIS ACAULIS) 3 BABY'S BREATH (GYSOPHILA PANICULATA) 4 CHOCOLATE FLOWER (BERLANDERIA LYRATA ) 5 DESERT GLOBE MALLOW (SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA) 6 DESERT MARIGOLD (BAILEYA MULTIRADIATA) 7 FIREWHEEL (GAILLARDIA PULCHELLA) 8 GOLDEN COLUMBINE (AQUILEGIA CHRYSANTHA) 9 GOODDING VERBENA (GLANDULARIA GOODINGII) 10 MEXICAN EVENING PRIMROSE (OENOTHER SPECIOSA) 11 FIRECRACKER PENSTEMON (PENSTEMON EATONII) 12 PALMER’S PENSTEMON (PENSTEMON PALMERI) 12 PARRY’S PENSTEMON (PENSTEMON PARRYI) 13 PURPLE CONE FLOWER (ECHINACEA PURPUREA) 14 RED HOT POKER (KNOPHIA SSP.) 15 ROSEMARY (ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS 'PROSTRATUS') 16 SANDPAPER VERBENA (VERBENA RIGIDA) 17 SHOWY MILKWEED (ASCLEPIAS SPECIOSA) 18 GRASSES 19 BEARGRASS (NOLINA MICROCARPA) 20 BLUE GRAMA GRASS (BOUTELOUA GRACILIS) 21 BUFFALOGRASS (BOUTELOUA DACTYLOIDES) 22 DEER GRASS (MULENBERGIA RIGENS) 23 LITTLE BLUESTEM (SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM) 24 PINK MUHLYGRASS (MULENBERGIA CAPILLARIS) 25 PURPLE THREE AWN (ARISTIDA PURPUREA) 26 SHRUBS 27 AUTUMN SAGE (SALVIA GREGGII) 28 BUSH DALEA/INDIGO BUSH (DALEA PULCHRA) 29 CHIHUAHUAN SAGE (LEUCOPHYLLUM LAEVIGATUM) 30 DESERT CEANOTHUS (CEANOTHUS GREGGII A. GRAY) 31 DESERT HONEYSUCKLE (ANISACANTHUS THURBERI)
[Show full text]