DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Proposal to the Adaptation Fund

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PROJECT PROPOSAL TO THE ADAPTATION FUND PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: Regular Country: South Africa Title of Project: Taking Adaptation to the Ground: A Small Grants Facility for Enabling Local Level Responses to Climate Change Type of Implementing Entity: National Implementing Entity: South African National Biodiversity Institute Executing Entity: SouthSouthNorth Trust Amount of Financing Requested: USD 2,442,682 Short Summary Climate change projections have indicated that both the Mopani District, in Limpopo in the north east of South Africa, and the Namakwa District, in the Northern Cape in the north west of South Africa, will be subject to increasing temperatures and changing rainfall patterns. According to local scale analysis of historical trends and future projections, there is a distinct warming trend for both Mopani and Namakwa, which will be far more severe by 2050 if global mitigation efforts are unsuccessful. Rainfall changes are much less certain, with temporal and spatial variability. Yet in historical trends there are indications of an increase in the intensity of heavy rainfall events in both areas, evident through a decrease in the number of rain days coupled with an unchanged average annual rainfall. Warming, and the associated increase in the number of extremely warm days, is set to impact evaporation rates and water availability. This is a concern as water is already scarce in Namakwa and in parts of Mopani. Greater amplitude of dry and wet spells, along with increasing temperatures, will negatively impact already stressed communities in both areas – thus rendering them more vulnerable to the impacts of climate variability and change, more specifically droughts, seasonal shifts and storm- related disaster events. Climate-related risks are generally greater for disadvantaged, rural and poor communities because of limited adaptive capacity and greater sensitivity to climate-driven impacts. Both Mopani and Namakwa Districts are characterised by the prevalence of rural, poor communities vulnerable to the impacts of climate variability and change. This threat requires climate finance for adaptation activities to find its way to these most vulnerable communities. However, such communities typically lack the capacity required to access the necessary funding. The project thus entails the implementation of a small grant finance mechanism to address this financial, capacity and adaptation need. The Community Adaptation Small Grants Facility (SGF) will increase climate resilience in rural communities and socio-economic systems in these two pilot district municipalities in South Africa, by working directly with local stakeholders and anticipated beneficiaries through a small granting mechanism. The overall goal of the project is to ensure that vulnerable, rural communities in the project target areas have reduced vulnerability and increased resilience to the anticipated impacts of climate variability and change. The objective is to incorporate climate adaptation response strategies into local practices so that assets, livelihoods and ecosystem services are protected from climate- induced risks associated with expected droughts, seasonal shifts and storm-related disaster events. The project will do so through three main components: i) providing small grants to vulnerable communities that deliver tangible and sustainable benefits; ii) empowering local institutions to identify and implement adaptation response measures; and iii) compiling and sharing lessons learned to facilitate future scaling up and replication of small grant-financing approaches. 1 The Community Adaptation SGF will be led by SouthSouthNorth (SSN) Trust, who will act as the Executing Entity (EE), and Conservation South Africa (CSA), who will act as the Facilitating Agency in the Namakwa District. The Facilitating Agency for the Mopani District is still to be selected. Table of Contents PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION ..................................................................................................... 1 Short Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Background and Context: ..................................................................................................... 4 Project Objectives: .......................................................................................................................... 17 Project Components and Financing: ............................................................................................... 18 Projected Calendar: ........................................................................................................................ 19 PART II: PROJECT JUSTIFICATION ................................................................................................ 19 A. Describe the project components, particularly focusing on the concrete adaptation activities of the project, and how these activities contribute to climate resilience. ............................................ 19 B. Describe how the project provides economic, social and environmental benefits, with particular reference to the most vulnerable communities, and vulnerable groups within communities, including gender considerations. Describe how the project will avoid or mitigate negative impacts, in compliance with the Environmental and Social Policy of the Adaptation Fund. ............................. 32 C. Describe or provide an analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the proposed project. ............... 36 D. Describe how the project is consistent with national or sub-national sustainable development strategies, including, where appropriate, national or sub-national development plans, poverty reduction strategies, national communications, or national adaptation programs of action, or other relevant instruments, where they exist. ........................................................................................... 38 E. Describe how the project meets relevant national technical standards, where applicable, such as standards for environmental assessment, building codes, etc., and complies with the Environmental and Social Policy of the Adaptation Fund. .............................................................. 39 F. Describe if there is duplication of project with other funding sources, if any. ......................... 40 G. If applicable, describe the learning and knowledge management component to capture and disseminate lessons learned. .......................................................................................................... 44 H. Describe the consultative process, including the list of stakeholders consulted, undertaken during project preparation, with particular reference to vulnerable groups, including gender considerations, in compliance with the Environmental and Social Policy of the Adaptation Fund. 44 I. Provide justification for funding requested, focusing on the full cost of adaptation reasoning.50 J. Describe how the sustainability of the project outcomes has been taken into account when designing the project. ...................................................................................................................... 52 K. Provide an overview of the environmental and social impacts and risks identified as being relevant to the project. ..................................................................................................................... 53 PART III: IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ............................................................................ 55 A. Describe the arrangements for project implementation. ......................................................... 55 B. Describe the measures for financial and project risk management. ....................................... 60 C. Describe the measures for environmental and social risk management, in line with the Environmental and Social Policy of the Adaptation Fund. .............................................................. 62 D. Describe the monitoring and evaluation arrangements and provide a budgeted M&E plan. 62 E. Include a results framework for the project, including milestones, targets and indicators. ..... 66 F. Demonstrate how the project aligns with the Results Framework of the Adaptation Fund .... 69 G. Include a detailed budget with budget notes, a budget on the Implementing Entity management fee use, and an explanation and a breakdown of the execution costs. .................... 71 H. Include a disbursement schedule with time-bound milestones. .............................................. 74 PART IV: ENDORSEMENT BY GOVERNMENT AND CERTIFICATION BY THE IMPLEMENTING ENTITY ................................................................................................................................................ 75 ANNEXES ....................................................................................................................................... 76 2 Acronyms African Climate and Development ACDI LAMOSA Land Access Movement of South Africa Initiative Limpopo Department of Economic AF Adaptation Fund LEDET Development, Environment and Tourism Association of Limpopo Early Childhood Limpopo Organic Farmers & Excillie Co- ALERT LIOFA Development Resource & Training operative Association for Water and Rural
Recommended publications
  • THE HISTORY of the PIETERSBURG [POLOKWANE] JEWISH COMMUNITY by CHARLOTTE WIENER Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements

    THE HISTORY of the PIETERSBURG [POLOKWANE] JEWISH COMMUNITY by CHARLOTTE WIENER Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements

    THE HISTORY OF THE PIETERSBURG [POLOKWANE] JEWISH COMMUNITY by CHARLOTTE WIENER Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the subject JUDAICA at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: MR CEDRIC GINSBERG NOVEMBER 2006 SUMMARY Jews were present in Pietersburg [Polokwane] from the time of its establishment in 1868. They came from Lithuania, England and Germany. They were attracted by the discovery of gold, land and work opportunities. The first Jewish cemetery was established on land granted by President Paul Kruger in 1895. The Zoutpansberg Hebrew Congregation, which included Pietersburg and Louis Trichardt was established around 1897. In 1912, Pietersburg founded its own congregation, the Pietersburg Hebrew Congregation. A Jewish burial society, a benevolent society and the Pietersburg-Zoutpansberg Zionist Society was formed. A communal hall was built in 1921 and a synagogue in 1953. Jews contributed to the development of Pietersburg and held high office. There was little anti-Semitism. From the 1960s, Jews began moving to the cities. The communal hall and minister’s house were sold in 1994 and the synagogue in 2003. Only the Jewish cemetery remains in Pietersburg. 10 key words: 1] Pietersburg [Polokwane] 2] Zoutpansberg 3] Anglo-Boer War 4] Jew 5] Synagogue 6] Cemetery 7] Rabbi 8] Hebrew 9] Zionist 10] Anti-Semitism ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the following: Mr Cedric Ginsberg, my supervisor, for his invaluable assistance, patience and meticulous corrections The late Mr Wally Levy for his information concerning families and events in the Northern Transvaal. His prodigious memory was extremely helpful to me My husband Dennis and children Janine, Elian and Mandy, for their patience with my obsession to finish this thesis.
  • A Taxonomic Study of the Thesium Goetzeanum Species Complex (Santalaceae)

    A Taxonomic Study of the Thesium Goetzeanum Species Complex (Santalaceae)

    COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. How to cite this thesis Surname, Initial(s). (2012) Title of the thesis or dissertation. PhD. (Chemistry)/ M.Sc. (Physics)/ M.A. (Philosophy)/M.Com. (Finance) etc. [Unpublished]: University of Johannesburg. Retrieved from: https://ujcontent.uj.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Index?site_name=Research%20Output (Accessed: Date). A taxonomic study of the Thesium goetzeanum species complex (Santalaceae) By Natasha Visser Dissertation Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master in Botany at the University of Johannesburg Supervisor: Prof Ben-Erik van Wyk Co-supervisor: Dr M. Marianne le Roux May 2018 Thesium goetzeanum complex Content Contents Summary .................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 Material and Methods...............................................................................................
  • Keep the Dream196 AH 16 New Agatha Road Tzaneen Limpopo 0835 Cell 0732742080 Fax 0865609206 Email: Website

    Keep the Dream196 AH 16 New Agatha Road Tzaneen Limpopo 0835 Cell 0732742080 Fax 0865609206 Email: Website

    Business Plan Keep The Dream196 AH 16 New Agatha Road Tzaneen Limpopo 0835 Cell 0732742080 Fax 0865609206 Email: www.keepthedream196.com Website: www.keepthedream196.com 1 PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com I. Table of Contents II. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 3 III. General Company Description............................................................................................. 3 IV. Products and Services .......................................................................................................... 8 V. Marketing Plan ...................................................................................................................... 16 VI. Operational Plan .................................................................................................................. 25 VII. Management and Organization ....................................................................................... 30 VIII. Budget………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….32 IX. Voice of the Child………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………34 2 PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com II. Executive Summary Keep The Dream196 is a local NGO which has been operating in Greater Tzaneen Municipality for the last 11yrs working with 2,456 orphan and vulnerable children aged between 5-26yrs in 65 villages and 86 sites around Greater Tzaneen. Since our inception we have grown to include
  • Tourist Accommodation Facili

    Tourist Accommodation Facili

    Environmental Impact Assessment Report: Existing tourist accommodation facilities and clearance of indigenous 1 vegetation on Portions 16, 17 and 18 of the farm Franschoek 593-LT in Magoebaskloof, near Tzaneen, Limpopo Province APPLICANT: ELSPETH HUMPHREYS APPLICATION TO RECTIFY UNLAWFUL COMMENCEMENT OF LISTED ACTIVITIES: TOURIST ACCOMMODATION FACILITIES AND CLEARANCE OF INDIGENOUS VEGETATION ON PORTIONS 16, 17 AND 18 OF THE FARM FRANSCHOEK 593-LT IN MAGOEBASKLOOF, NEAR TZANEEN, LIMPOPO PROVINCE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT OCTOBER 2017 CONTACT: Ms Louise Agenbag TEL: 015 307 3606 / 083 339 2731 FAX: 015 307 3080 / 086 527 0012 E-MAIL: [email protected] POST: PO Box 1935, TZANEEN, 0850 ADDRESS: 21C Peace Street, Tzaneen WEB: www.polygonenvironmental.co.za Polygon Environmental Planning 015 307 3606 (t) – 015 307 3080 (f) – [email protected] – PO Box 1935, TZANEEN, 0850 – www.polygonenvironmental.co.za Environmental Impact Assessment Report: Existing tourist accommodation facilities and clearance of indigenous 2 vegetation on Portions 16, 17 and 18 of the farm Franschoek 593-LT in Magoebaskloof, near Tzaneen, Limpopo Province APPLICATION TO RECTIFY UNLAWFUL COMMENCEMENT OF LISTED ACTIVITIES: TOURIST ACCOMMODATION FACILITIES AND CLEARANCE OF INDIGENOUS VEGETATION ON PORTIONS 16, 17 AND 18 OF THE FARM FRANSCHOEK 593-LT IN MAGOEBASKLOOF, NEAR TZANEEN, LIMPOPO PROVINCE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT ABBREVIATIONS......................................................................................................................................
  • LIMPOPO © for The2010worldcup, Besure Toalsogetoutoftown

    LIMPOPO © for The2010worldcup, Besure Toalsogetoutoftown

    © Lonely Planet 482 Limpopo If South Africa’s northernmost province sounds familiar, it could be from Rudyard Kipling’s Just So Stories, in which the curious young elephant treks to ‘the great grey-green, greasy Limpopo River, all set about with fever trees’. While Kipling’s pachyderm unintentionally gains a trunk, curious humans might, similarly, cross Limpopo to access Kruger National Park and stumble upon the less-visited Valley of the Olifants. The subtropical area packs in misty Magoebaskloof, where waterfalls crash in the forests, and mysterious Modjadji, home of rain-summoning queens and Modjadji palms (cycads). The mystique continues in the Venda region, a traditional area where a python god is believed to live in Lake Fundudzi, and artists produce highly original work. And that’s just to the east of the N1. To the west, attractions include the Waterberg, where the Big Five, the endangered Cape vulture and, yes, fever trees are found in the mountains. Heading north from there, the savannah gives way to the Soutpansberg, an island of biodiversity with 540 bird species, and secluded lodges at the top of steep tracks. Then the baobab trees appear, and the empty roads lead to Mapungubwe National Park, where the remains of a millennium-old civilisation overlook the confluence of the Limpopo and Shashe Rivers. With icons ranging from Mapungubwe’s gold-plated rhino figurine to ‘Breaker’ Morant, the second Anglo-Boer War folk hero, Limpopo is an extraordinarily diverse province. If one thing unites its tourist operators, including Fair Trade lodges and art or birding routes, it’s that they offer visitors something completely different.
  • Agri-Hubs Identified by Limpopo

    Agri-Hubs Identified by Limpopo

    ONE PAGER EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES – AGRI-HUBS as on 6 November 2015 Agri-Hubs Identified by the Province LIMPOPO PROVINCE 27 PRIORITY DISTRICTS PROVINCE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROPOSED AGRI-HUB Limpopo Vhembe Nwanedi Mopani Tzaneen Sekhukhune Groblersdal Capricorn Ga-Poopedi Waterberg Modimolle 1 Capricorn District Municipality Proposed Agri-Hub Location :Ga-Poopedi District Context Demographics The district is situated at the core of economic development in The district has 1 1261 463 people and the total number of households the Limpopo Province and includes the capital of the province, the is 342838 with an average household size of 3.7 (Census 2011). City of Polokwane. Total Area: 21 705km². Capricorn District 59.9% of the population is within the 15 to 64 year age group. Municipality falls under the Limpopo province, located on the northern Unemployment rate is at 37.2% with 49.9% of all households that are side of South Africa. It derives its name from the Tropic of Capricorn, female headed. According to Census 2011, half of the population along which it is situated. It is predominantly rural in nature. It of the CDM resides in the Polokwane Municipality, followed by consists of the following five local municipalities: Aganang, Blouberg, Lepelle-Nkumpi, Blouberg and Aganang with 18%, 13% and 10% Lepelle-Nkumpi, Molemole and Polokwane. Limpopo's capital, respectively, while Molemole Local Municipality accounts for 9% Polokwane (previously Pietersburg), lies in the heart of the Capricorn of the population of the district. Although the population of the region. The district has an internal airport, and is linked to Gauteng by district is growing, the rate of growth is declining.
  • African Butterfly News and Afrotropical Butterflies

    African Butterfly News and Afrotropical Butterflies

    JANUARY 2020 EDITION: ABN 2020 - 1 AFRICAN (NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2019) BUTTERFLY THE LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY OF AFRICA NEWS LATEST NEWS Welcome to January’s newsletter! I hope you have all returned safely from your December holidays – assuming you had one – and had some memorable butterfly experiences. LepSoc Africa Annual Conference and AGM The 2019 LepSoc Africa Conference and AGM was held at Knysna Hollow, Knysna, over the weekend of 16 and 17 November. On Friday evening, before the conference, Hermann Staude hosted a Butterfly Evening, which was titled “Species, speciation and diversification, why are our butterflies and their hosts so exceptionally diverse?”. The evening included dinner at Knysna Hollow and was a great opportunity to renew acquaintances prior to the conference. Saturday involved a full series of talks and, in the evening, we held the society’s annual dinner and prize-giving at Belvidere. The winners of the major prizes were as follows: Torben Larsen Memorial Tankard (awarded to the best, or most influential publication on African lepidoptera), went to Hermann Hacker for “Moths of Africa – Volume 1” Ivan Bampton Perpetual Teapot (best life-history records) was awarded to Jean-Louis Amiet for “Natural Histories of the Butterflies of Cameroon” Steve Collins accepting the Honorary Life Membership of LepSoc Africa was awarded, Ivan Bampton trophy on behalf of Jean-Louis Amiet posthumously, to Dr Martin Krüger for his immense contribution to our understanding of African lepidoptera. The certificate was accepted by Martin’s widow, Kerstin. 1 The Chairman’s Award was given to Hanna Edge in recognition of her considerable efforts in refining the LepSoc Africa membership list, following up with subscription payments and assisting members with any queries they may have had.
  • Greater Tzaneen Municipality FINAL IDP 2020/2021 Page 3 of 345

    Greater Tzaneen Municipality FINAL IDP 2020/2021 Page 3 of 345

    GREATER TZANEEN MUNICIPALITY VISION "A Green, Prosperous and United Municipality that Provides Quality Services to All” Table of Content Page MAYOR'S FOREWORD............................................ ...................................................................... 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................... ........................................................... 11 FINAL IDP 2020/2021 FINAL IDP 2020/2021Page 1 of 345 fy TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD BY THE MAYOR ............................................................................................................................... 8 1. PLANNING FRAMEWORK .......................................................................................................................... 10 2. MUNICIPAL PROFILE ................................................................................................................................. 26 3. SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................... 37 KPA 1: SPATIAL RATIONALE ............................................................................................................................ 37 4. KPA 2: BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES ................................. 65 5. KPA 3: LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................. 108 6. KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ........................................................
  • Lepelle – Nkumpi Magisterial District

    Lepelle – Nkumpi Magisterial District

    # # !C # # ### !C^ !.C# # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # ^!C # # # # # # # ^ # # ^ # # !C # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # !C # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # #!C# # # # # # !C ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # !C # !C # #^ # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # ## #!C # # # # # # !C# ## # # # # # !C # # #!C## # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## ## # # !C # # # # # ## # ## #!C # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # #!C # # # # # # # # # # !C# !C# # #^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # #!C ## # #^# # !C #!C## # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # # #!C ^ ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # !C # #!C # # #!C # # !C## # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # ## # # # ## # ## ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # #!C # # # ## # # # # # # # # # ^!C # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # #!C # # !C # # !C ## # # # # #!C # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # !C# # ## # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # ### #!C# # # !C !C# ##!C # ## # # # # # # # # !C# # !.# # # # ## ## # #!C# # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ### ##^ # # # # # # # ## # # # # ^ # !C# ## # # # # # # !C## # ## # # # # ## # # # ## # ## # # # # # !C## !C# # !C# ### # !C### # # ^ # # # !C ### # # # !C# ##!C # !C # # # ^ !C ## # # #!C ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## !C## ## # # # # # # ## # # # # # !C # ## ## # # # # !C # # ^ # ## # ## # # # !.!C ## # # ## # # # # !C # # !C# # ### # # # # # # # # # # ## !C # # # #
  • Database Column Report

    Database Column Report

    Page: 1 GROOT LETABA RIVER WATER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (GLeWaP): STAKEHOLDER DATABASE – COLUMN REPORT Name: Company City Muller, Willie A M Muller en Seuns LETSITELE Muhlongo, Mhlavasi Abbie Farm (Nwatsuvula) NWAMITWA Ndhlovu, Abbie Abbie Farm (Nwatsuvula) NWAMITWA Ndhlovu, Johannes Abbie Farm (Nwatsuvula) NWAMITWA Ndhlovu, July Abbie Farm (Nwatsuvula) NWAMITWA Ndhlovu, Rosie Abbie Farm (Nwatsuvula) NWAMITWA Maluleke, S. African Farmers Union TZANEEN Rapitsi , David African National Congress NWAMITWA Mothiba, Moshala African National Congress POLOKWANE Ramalepe, Shadrack African National Congress (ANC) NAMAKGALE Strydom, Melissa Agri Letaba TZANEEN Taylor, Ingrid Agri Letaba TZANEEN van Rooyen, Louis Agri Letaba - Letaba Water Users Association LETSITELE Long, Tony Agri Letaba/ Agri Limpopo TZANEEN Prinsloo, Elna Agri Limpopo - Loskop LADANNA Booysen, Werner Agri Limpopo: ZZ2 FAUNA PARK Stapylton, C. Agri North TZANEEN Opperman, Nic Agri SA PRETORIA van der Merwe, Hans Agri SA PRETORIA van Zyl, Phille Agri SA Commodity Chamber MOOKETSI van Wyk, Riaan Agri SA Gauteng BIRCHLEIGH Rall, Gert Agri SA Limpopo (Morgenzon, Leeukuil) POLOKWANE Botha, Ilze Agri SA Magazine PRETORIA van Rooyen, Johan Agricultural Business Chamber (ABC) PRETORIA Taunyane, Tumi Agricultural News PRETORIA Moephuli, Shadrack Agricultural Research Council PRETORIA Mpandeli, Sylvester Agricultural Research Council PRETORIA Shaker, Massoud Agricultural Research Council SILVERTON Barnard, Robin Agriculture Research Council PRETORIA Bloem, Pierre AgriSpectrum POLOKWANE Liebenberg-Enslin,
  • Glewap Draft Scoping Report, October 2007

    Glewap Draft Scoping Report, October 2007

    INSERT COVER PAGE HERE Groot Letaba River Water Development Project (GLeWaP) ii Environmental Impact Assessment REPORT DETAILS PAGE Project name: Groot Letaba River Water Development Project Report Title: Draft Scoping Report Author: Terry Baker with input from various specialist PSP project reference no.: 600290 Status of report: Draft First issue: October 2007 Final issue: ILISO CONSULTING (PTY) LTD Approved for ILISO Consulting (Pty) Ltd by: Dr M van Veelen Date Study Leader BKS (Pty) Ltd Approved for the Project Coordinator by: RA Pullen Date Project Coordinator DEPARTMENT WATER AFFAIRS & FORESTRY (DWAF) Approved for DWAF by: GLeWaP Draft Scoping Report 26 Sept 07 - Compressed Pics.doc DRAFT 26/09/2007 Groot Letaba River Water Development Project (GLeWaP) iii Environmental Impact Assessment PREFACE The Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) is currently undertaking an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to investigate the environmental feasibility of raising the Tzaneen Dam, the construction of a storage dam in the Groot Letaba River and associated bulk water infrastructure (pipelines, pump stations, off-takes and reservoirs) in the Limpopo province. The EIA is being undertaken by ILISO Consulting (technical aspects) with Zitholele Consulting providing the public participation support. The EIA is being undertaken according to the EIA Regulations under Section 24 (5) of the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA), (Act No 107 of 1998) as amended in Government Notice R385, 386, 387 – Government Gazette No. 28753 of 21 April 2006. An EIA must show the authorities and the proponent what the consequences of their decisions will be in environmental, economic and social terms. An EIA is comprised of various pahses, with the Scoping Phase as the first and key phase.
  • South Africa's Land Reform in Historical Perspective

    South Africa's Land Reform in Historical Perspective

    South Africa’s Land Reform in Historical Perspective: Land settlement and agriculture in Mopani District, Limpopo, 19th century to 2015 Michelle Hay A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Johannesburg, August 2015. Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own unaided work. It has been submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. It has not been submitted for any degree or examination in any other university. Signed Michelle Hay, August 2015 i Acknowledgements I first began to seriously imagine myself as a historian during one of Peter Delius’s fascinating lectures on pre-colonial South African history. Peter’s encouragement to follow that path led me to do my honours, masters and PhD. As my supervisor he has been intellectually stimulating and challenging, and given me enormous support. I may not have finished, and certainly would not have enjoyed the research and writing as much as I did, without Peter’s mentorship and friendship. I cannot thank him enough. Ripfumelo Mushwana, my research assistant, interpretor and friend, helped me to interview people but also taught me a lot about being young in Mopani district today. Without her and her impressive diplomatic skills, I would not have been able to conduct such an interesting range of interviews, with so little stress. Thanks to her and her partner Jonas also for welcoming me into their home. Many people allowed me to interview them and taught me a lot.