DOCSLIB.ORG

Half-Year Financial Report at June 30, 2021 Open Power for a Brighter Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OPEN POWER FOR A BRIGHTER FUTURE. WE EMPOWER SUSTAINABLE PROGRESS. HALF-YEAR FINANCIAL REPORT AT JUNE 30, 2021 OPEN POWER FOR A BRIGHTER FUTURE. BRIGHTER HALF-YEAR FINANCIAL REPORT AT JUNE 30, 2021 ENEL IS OPEN POWER Open Power VI to tackle some SI of the world’s ON biggest challenges. POS ITI PUR ON ING PO Open Power SE > Open access to electricity for more people. MI > Open the world of energy to new technology. > Open up to new uses of energy. SSI > Open up to new ways of managing energy for people. ON > Open up to new partnerships. > Make decisions in daily activities PRI and take responsibility for them. > Share information, being willing to collaborate NCI and open to the contribution of others. PLES > Follow through with commitments, pursuing OF activities with determination and passion. > Change priorities rapidly if the situation evolves. CO > Get results by aiming for excellence. NDU > Adopt and promote safe behavior and move pro-actively to improve conditions for health, CT safety and well-being. > Work for the integration of all, recognizing and leveraging individual diversity (culture, gender, age, disabilities, personality etc.). Open Power > Work focusing on satisfying customers for a brighter and/or co-workers, acting effectively and rapidly. future. > Propose new solution and do not give up when faced with obstacles or failure. We empower > Recognize merit in co-workers and give sustainable feedback that can improve their contribution. progress. > Trust VA > Proactivity LU > Responsibility ES > Innovation Half-Year Financial Report at June 30, 2021 ENEL IS OPEN POWER 2 CONTENTS ENEL GOVERNANCE GROUP STRATEGY GROUP & RISK MANAGEMENT Highlights 8 Corporate boards 18 Group strategy 28 World Economic Enel organizational The 2021-2023 Forum (WEF) 10 model 20 Business Plan 30 Value creation Values and pillars Reference scenario 32 and the business model 12 of corporate ethics 22 Risk management 37 INTERIM REPORT ON OPERATIONS INTERIM REPORT GROUP OUTLOOK CONDENSED INTERIM PERFORMANCE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Definition of performance Outlook for operations 142 Consolidated Income indicators 54 Statement 146 Performance of the Group 56 Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income 147 Value created and distributed Statement of Consolidated to stakeholders 68 Financial Position 148 Analysis of the Statement of Changes Group’s financial position in Consolidated Equity 150 and structure 69 Consolidated Statement Results by business line 75 of Cash Flows 152 > Thermal Generation Notes to the condensed and Trading 80 interim consolidated financial statements 153 > Enel Green Power 86 Declaration of the > Infrastructure Chief Executive Officer and Networks 94 CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FINANCIAL CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED and the Financial Reporting > End-user Markets 100 Officer 198 > Enel X 104 Reports > Services and Other 108 Independent auditors’ Innovation report 200 and digitalization 111 Attachments People centricity 114 Subsidiaries, associates Sustainable supply chain 120 and other significant investments of the The circular economy 121 Enel Group at June 30, 2021 202 Significant events in the 1st Half of 2021 123 Regulatory and rate issues 127 Half-Year Financial Report at June 30, 2021 1 ENEL GROUP INTERIM REPORT ON OPERATIONS INTERIM REPORT 6 Half-Year Financial Report at June 30, 2021 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 Condensed interim Enel Group Governance Group Strategy & Group Outlook consolidated financial Risk Management Performance statements HIGHLIGHTS 8 1st Half SDG 2021 2020 Change Revenue (millions of euro) 29,853 33,375 -10.6% Gross operating profit (millions of euro) 7,719 8,645 -10.7% Ordinary gross operating profit (millions of euro) 8,360 8,794 -4.9% Profit attributable to owners of the Parent (millions of euro) 1,778 1,947 -8.7% Ordinary profit attributable to owners of the Parent (millions of euro) 2,299 2,405 -4.4% Net financial debt (millions of euro) 50,418 45,415 (2) 11.0% Cash flows from operating activities (millions of euro) 2,676 2,042 31.0% Capital expenditure on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets (millions of euro) 4,813 (1) 4,137 16.3% Total net efficient installed capacity (GW) 85.5 84.0 (2) 1.8% 7 Net efficient installed renewables capacity (GW) 46.6 45.0 (2) 3.6% 7 Net efficient installed renewables capacity (%) 54.5% 53.6% (2) 1.7% 7 Additional efficient installed renewables capacity (GW) 1.6 0.8 - Net electricity generation (TWh) 105.8 97.6 8.4% 7 Net renewable electricity generation (TWh) 54.75 51.10 7. 1 % 9 Electricity distribution and transmission grid (km) (3) 2,240,255 2,232,039 (2) 0.4% 9 Electricity transported on Enel’s distribution grid (TWh) (3) 245.7 231.1 6.3% End users (no.) 74,783,118 7,035,488 1.0% 9 End users with active smart meters (no.) (4) 44,688,896 44,156,784 1.2% Electricity sold by Enel (TWh) 152.1 145.0 4.9% Retail customers (no.) 69,123,677 70,013,654 -1.3% - of which free market (3) 24,163,373 23,178,572 4.2% 11 Storage (MW) 137 123 (2) 11.4% 11 Charging points (no.) (3) 124,532 87,74 5 41.9% 11 Demand response (MW) 7,376 6,128 20.4% No. of employees 65,923 66,717 (2) -1.2% No. of “high consequence” accidents 1 2 -50.0% (5) 13 Specific direct greenhouse gas emissions - Scope 1 - gCO2eq/kWh 207 - - (1) Does not include €61 million regarding units classified as “held for sale” in the 1st Half of 2021. (2) At December 31, 2020. (3) The figure for 2020 reflects a more accurate calculation of the aggregate. (4) To ensure a uniform comparison, the figure for 2020 has been adjusted on the basis of the new calculation method, which excludes digital meters with an active contract that are not managed remotely. (5) Comparative figures for the 1st Half of 2020 are not available as the semi-annual collection of this data began in 2021. Half-Year Financial Report at June 30, 2021 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 Condensed interim Enel Group Governance Group Strategy & Group Outlook consolidated financial Risk Management Performance statements sistent Reporting of Sustainable Value Creation”, with the aim WORLD of defining shared common metrics to measure, report and compare levels of sustainability – in other words, the effec- ECONOMIC tiveness of its actions in pursuing the Sustainable Develop- ment Goals (SDGs) set by the United Nations – in the business FORUM (WEF) model adopted to create value for stakeholders. The metrics are based on existing standards and seek to in- crease convergence and comparability between the various The International Business Council (IBC) of the World Eco- parameters used today in sustainability reports. nomic Forum has developed a report entitled “Measuring The following table gives the 21 main indicators specified in Stakeholder Capitalism: Towards Common Metrics and Con- the WEF report. Consolidated Half-Year Financial Report 2021 KPIs representing the 21 H1 Chapter/Section reporting all KPIs and Pillar Theme 21 CORE KPIs CORE KPIs of the WEF 2021 disclosure on the 21 CORE KPIs of the WEF Governing Setting purpose Enel is Open Power purpose Quality of Governance body “Corporate boards” section in “Governance” governing No. of women on Board (no.) 4 composition chapter body Material issues Stakeholder “Basis of Presentation” section of the 2020 impacting engagement Integrated Annual Report PRINCIPLES OF stakeholders GOVERNANCE Confirmed violations for conflict Anti-corruption 1 of interest/corruption (no.) Ethical “Values and pillars of corporate ethics” Protected ethics behaviour Reports received for violations section in “Governance” chapter advice and reporting 78 of Code of Ethics (no.) mechanisms Risk and Integrating risk and “Risk management” section in “Group opportunity opportunity into Strategy & Risk Management” chapter oversight business process Direct greenhouse gas 22.4 emissions - Scope 1 (million teq) “Fighting climate change and ensuring Greenhouse gas Indirect greenhouse gas environmental sustainability” section in (GHG) emissions emissions - Scope 3: emissions Climate 11.51 “Group Performance” chapter connected with sale of gas change PLANET (million teq) “Governance”, “Group Strategy & Risk TCFD Management”, “Group Performance” and implementation “Outlook” chapters Land use and Nature loss Protected areas (1) (no.) 187 ecological sensitivity Water consumption “Fighting climate change and ensuring Freshwater and withdrawals Water withdrawals in water- 27 environmental sustainability” section in availability in water-stressed stressed areas (%) “Group Performance” chapter areas 10 Consolidated Half-Year Financial Report 2021 KPIs representing the 21 H1 Chapter/Section reporting all KPIs and Pillar Theme 21 CORE KPIs CORE KPIs of the WEF 2021 disclosure on the 21 CORE KPIs of the WEF Diversity and Women as proportion of total “People centricity” section in “Group 22.1 inclusion employees (%) Perfomance” chapter Pay equality Equal Remuneration Ratio (1) (%) 83.3 Dignity and Wage level CEO Pay Ratio (2) (%) 146 equality Assessment of protection of Risk for incidents child labor and compliance “Values and pillars of corporate ethics” of child, forced or with ban on forced labor in the section in “Governance” chapter compulsory labour supply chain PEOPLE Fatal accidents - Enel (no.) 1 Frequency of fatal accidents 0.016 - Enel (i.) Health and “People centricity” section in “Group Health and safety “High consequence” accidents well-being 1 Performance” chapter - Enel (no.) Frequency of “high 0.016 consequence” accidents - Enel (i.) Skills for the Average hours of training per “People centricity”
Recommended publications
  • P501 Numerical Simulation of Wind Power Potential in Upstate New York

    P501 Numerical Simulation of Wind Power Potential in Upstate New York

    P501 NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF WIND POWER POTENTIAL IN UPSTATE NEW YORK Robert Ballentine *, Scott Steiger and Daniel Phoenix State University of New York at Oswego 1. INTRODUCTION 2. METHODOLOGY Consistent with the national goal of moving away 2.1 Grid Arrangement from our dependence on carbon-based fuels, there is considerable interest in New York State in developing We are running the ARW-core of WRF on a wind power especially in areas with highest potential. doubly-nested grid (Fig. 1) to ensure that both large- The purpose of this research is to simulate low-level scale meteorological forcing and local geographical winds over upstate New York by running the Weather effects are well-represented. The grid spacings of the Research and Forecasting (WRF, Skamarock, et al large, intermediate and fine grids are 12 km, 4 km and 2005) model every day on a high-resolution (1.333 1.333 km respectively. We use 33 sigma levels where km) domain. Using the standard wind speed-versus- the lowest levels correspond to 10m, 40m and 80m power generation curve for a GE 1.5 MW wind above ground under typical meteorological conditions. turbine, we can estimate the monthly and seasonal We employ the Noah LSM and Yonsei PBL schemes. average wind power potential at all of our grid points (covering much of upstate New York and adjacent Lake Ontario). To determine the accuracy of WRF wind predictions, we are comparing winds simulated by WRF at 10 m AGL with hourly observations at three regularly reporting sites near Lake Ontario. 1.1 Brief Description of Wind Power Sites As of November 2009, New York State had more than 1200 MW of wind generating capacity from sites such as Horizon Wind Energy's Maple Ridge Wind Farm in Lewis County and farms operated by Noble Environmental Power in Clinton, Franklin and Wyoming Counties.
  • Wind Turbine Related Noise: Current Knowledge and Research Needs

    Wind Turbine Related Noise: Current Knowledge and Research Needs

    New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Wind Turbine-Related Noise: Current Knowledge and Research Needs June 2013 NYSERDA Report 13-14 for Energy NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Our Mission: Advance innovative energy solutions in ways that improve New York’s economy and environment. Our Vision: Serve as a catalyst—advancing energy innovation and technology, transforming New York’s economy, empowering people to choose clean and efficient energy as part of their everyday lives. Our Core Values: Objectivity, integrity, public service, partnership and innovation. Our Portfolios NYSERDA programs are organized into five portfolios, each representing a complementary group of offerings with common areas of energy-related focus and objectives. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Deployment Energy and the Environment Helping to assess and mitigate the environmental impacts of Helping New York to achieve its aggressive energy efficiency and energy production and use – including environmental research renewable energy goals – including programs to motivate increased and development, regional initiatives to improve environmental efficiency in energy consumption by consumers (residential, sustainability and West Valley Site Management. commercial, municipal, institutional, industrial, and transportation), to increase production by renewable power suppliers, to support Energy Data, Planning and Policy market
  • Wind Energy in NY State

    Wind Energy in NY State

    2010 New York State Wind Energy Study Final Report Source: Milian, Chris; www.photosfromonhigh.com Submitted by: Christina Hoerig Kimballe Campbell Daniel Grew Nicole Gumbs Happiness Munedzimwe Sandeep George Jun Wan Timothy Komsa Karl Smolenski Tyler Coatney Cornell University II Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................II List of Figures .................................................................................................................... VI List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... VII 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................. VIII 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................10 3 New York State Present Energy Supply/Demand ....................................................14 3.1 New York Energy Background ............................................................................14 3.2 Current NYS Wind Power ...................................................................................16 3.3 Near Term Growth of New York State Wind Power .............................................17 3.4 Progress of Other Renewables in New York State ..............................................19 3.5 Power Demand in Tompkins County ...................................................................19
  • Before the State of New York Board on Electric

    Before the State of New York Board on Electric

    15-F-0122 Sokolow Post Hearing Brief BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW YORK BOARD ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE ENVIRONMENT In the Matter of Baron Wind LLC Case 15-F-0122 INITIAL POST-HEARING BRIEF Alice Sokolow Case #15-F-0122 also for Parties: Thomas Flansburg Mary Ann McManus Bert Candee Virginia Gullam Dated: 4/15/2019 1 15-F-0122 Sokolow Post Hearing Brief TABLE OF CONTENTS I Introduction 2 II Facility 2 III Legal Background 2-3 IV. Issues- Fremont Wind Law 3 V. Nature of Env Impact-Avian & Bat 5 VI. Nature of Env Impact –Safety Exh1001.6 11 Exh 1001.15 29 VII Nature of Env Viewshed & Flicker 54 VIII Not Addressed 70 IX Conclusions 70 I Introduction We are five individual parties with grave concerns over conditions and completeness of Baron Winds Applications for a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need Pursuant to Article 10 to Construct a Wind Energy Facility. II. Facility Description Baron Winds LLC (the Applicant) is proposing to construct the Baron Winds Project, a wind energy generation facility and associated infrastructure (the Facility) in the Towns of Cohocton, Dansville, Fremont, and Wayland in Steuben County, New York (See Figure 1).The Facility will consist of up to 69 utility scale wind turbines with a total generating capacity of up to 242 Megawatts (MW). Other proposed components will include: access roads, buried collection lines, up to four permanent meteorological (met) towers, one operations and maintenance (O&M) building, up to two temporary construction staging/laydown areas, and a collection/point of interconnection.
  • Jericho Rise Wind Farm Towns of Chateaugay and Bellmont Franklin County, New York

    Jericho Rise Wind Farm Towns of Chateaugay and Bellmont Franklin County, New York

    SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (SEIS) FOR THE Jericho Rise Wind Farm Towns of Chateaugay and Bellmont Franklin County, New York Co-lead Agencies: Town of Chateaugay and Bellmont Applicant: Jericho Rise Windfarm, LLC 808 Travis Street, Suite 700 Houston, Texas 77002 Contact: Aron Branam Phone: (503)-535-1519 Prepared By: Environmental Design & Research, Landscape Architecture, Engineering & Environmental Services, D.P.C. 217 Montgomery Street, Suite 1000 Syracuse, New York 13202 Contact: John Hecklau Phone: (315) 471-0688 Date of DEIS Submittal: February, 2008 Date of DEIS Acceptance: February, 2008 Date of SEIS Submittal: November 10, 2015 Date of SEIS Acceptance: December 7, 2015 Public Comment Period: December 9, 2015 – January 11, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PROJECT SUMMARY/INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2.1 Project Participation .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 PROJECT FACILITY
  • 2016 Madison County Renewable Energy Trail Map

    2016 Madison County Renewable Energy Trail Map

    2016 Madison County Renewable Energy Trail Map Welcome to the updated Madison County Renewable Energy Trail map. This map highlights the current innovative sustainability projects located in Madison County and is meant to be used as a guide to learn more about each of these initiatives. Sustainability is a concept that values all the assets of a community; environmentally, socially, and economically. This helps us recognize that communities gain more when those assets are leveraged together. Natural resources are one of Madison County’s strongest assets. Many of these projects showcase ways these natural resources are converted to natural assets: wind, solar, biomass, hydro and landfill gas are being used to create clean energy alternatives that promote the local economy. Madison County is home to several LEED certified buildings, the highest achievable standard for environmentally friendly design, as well as several cutting edge technologies including the only municipality with a flexible photovoltaic film cap over its landfill. The county also contains the FREE Center, an educational building with many different renewable technologies on display and tours for the public. These places and projects serve as important educational resources, many of which are open to the public and/or available for tours. Use this guide to learn more about how to visit these destinations first hand! Advancing these technologies and initiatives is a priority in Madison County. Madison County is fortunate to have so many forward thinking institutions, businesses, and individuals that are dedicated to looking beyond the status quo. These types of projects are creating a momentum that establishes Madison County as a leader in sustainable energy projects and brings new vitality to our communities.
  • 2Nd EPR Romania 2010 V2

    2Nd EPR Romania 2010 V2

    ECE/CEP/166 UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS ROMANIA Second Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2012 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 37 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. In particular, the boundaries shown on the maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. The United Nations issued the first Environmental Performance Review of Romania (Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 13) in 2001. This volume is issued in English only. ECE/CEP/166 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales E.12.II.E.11 ISBN 978-92-1-117065-8 e-ISBN 978-92-1-055895-2 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword In 1993, Environmental Performance Reviews (EPRs) of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) were initiated at the second Environment for Europe Ministerial Conference in Lucerne, Switzerland. They were intended to cover the ECE States that are not members of the Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development. At the fifth Environment for Europe Ministerial Conference (Kiev, 2003), the Ministers affirmed their support for the EPR Programme, and decided that the Programme should continue with a second cycle of reviews.
  • 2. Wind Energy in New York State

    2. Wind Energy in New York State

    Wind Energy Toolkit – Overview 2. Wind Energy in New York State 2.1. Market Drivers and Barriers Drivers for Wind Development in New York State Windy rural areas in the Northeast, such as those in Upstate and Western New York, have proved to be attractive to wind energy developers. Market drivers for wind development generally include an area’s proximity to major load centers, available electrical transmission capacity, and a good wind resource; regionally, drivers include the high costs of electrical energy in the Northeast, concerns over regional air quality, federal tax incentives, and legislative mandates in New York and neighboring states. Some specific factors that are driving the market for wind energy in New York include the following: • A good resource: New York State is ranked 15th in annual wind energy generating potential (7080 MW or approximately 62 billion kWh)—more than California or any state east of the Mississippi and the largest potential of any state in the Northeast.1 The location and relative strength of wind resources in New York State are shown in Figure 1. • State mandates: Renewable energy purchase mandates or renewable portfolio standards (RPS) in New York and neighboring states are driving the demand for new renewable resources in the region, particularly wind energy. Originally, the New York State RPS called for an increase in renewable energy used in the state from its then-current level of about 19% to 25% by the year 2013. In 2009, the RPS goal was expanded to 30% renewable energy by 2015. Wind energy is expected to supply a significant portion of the RPS requirement, which effectively creates a stable, long-term market for the retail sale of wind energy in New York.
  • Sustainability Matters U.S

    Sustainability Matters U.S

    SUSTAINABILITY MATTERS U.S. General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Office of Applied Science 1800 F Street, NW Washington, DC 20405 For more information: www.gsa.gov SUSTAINABILITY MATTERS U.S. General Services Administration 2008 1 MESSAGE FROM THE ACTING ADMINISTRATOR TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 MESSAGE FROM THE COMMISSIONER 4 INTRODUCTION 8 The Case for Sustainability CASE STUDY: SAN FRANCISCO FEDERAL BUILDING, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 34 The Greenest Alternative CASE STUDY: HOWARD M. METZENBAUM U.S. COURTHOUSE, CLEVELAND, OHIO 52 Cost, Value, and Procurement of Green Buildings CASE STUDY: EPA REGION 8 HEADQUARTERS, DENVER, COLORADO STRATEGIES 74 Energy Efficiency CASE STUDY: BISHOP HENRY WHIPPLE FEDERAL BUILDING, FORT SNELLING, MINNESOTA 100 Site and Water CASE STUDY: NOAA SATELLITE OPERATIONS FACILITY, SUITLAND, MARYLAND 118 Indoor Environmental Quality CASE STUDY: ALFRED A. ARRAJ U.S. COURTHOUSE, DENVER, COLORADO 140 Materials CASE STUDY: CARL T. CURTIS MIDWEST REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS, OMAHA, NEBRASKA 156 Operations and Maintenance CASE STUDY: JOHN J. DUNCAN FEDERAL BUILDING, KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE 182 Beyond GSA: The Greening of America CONVERSATIONS AND REFLECTIONS: BOB BERKEBILE, FAIA, AND BOB FOX, AIA 194 Moving Forward: The Challenges Ahead 204 GSA LEED BUILDINGS 211 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS THE HUMAN RACE IS CHALLENGED MORE THAN EVER BEFORE TO DEMONSTRATE OUR MASTERY— NOT OVER NATURE, BUT OURSELVES. RACHEL CARSON MESSAGE FROM THE ACTING ADMINISTRATOR For more than 30 years, the General Services Administration (GSA) has set the standard for sustainable, high-quality workplaces that improve productivity, revitalize communities, encourage environmental responsibility and promote intelligent decision making with respect to energy use. Sustainability has been an evolving theme for GSA beginning with energy efficiency initiatives, resulting from the oil embargo, in the early 1970s.
  • Tools to Promote and Regulate the Deployment of Renewable Energy Systems

    Tools to Promote and Regulate the Deployment of Renewable Energy Systems

    TOOLS TO PROMOTE AND REGULATE THE DEPLOYMENT OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS Recommendations for Municipalities June 2017 in Tompkins County The deployment of renewable energy systems can have considerable land use implications. The Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability has prepared this report to help assist municipalities as they work to prepare and to update their land use regulation of solar and wind energy systems. Tools to Promote and Regulate the Deployment of Renewable Energy Systems Recommendations for Municipalities in Tompkins County TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY Recommendations for Solar Energy Systems Roof-Mounted and Building-Integrated Accessory Ground-Mounted Large-Scale Recommendations for Wind Energy Systems Small-Scale Medium-Scale Large-Scale INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………….. 1 THE ROLE OF TOMPKINS COUNTY ……………………………………………… 2 SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS Definitions ………………………………………………………………………. 5 Notes: Roof-Mounted and Building-Integrated Solar Energy Systems … 7 Notes: Accessory Ground-Mounted Solar Energy Systems ……………… 7 Notes: Large-Scale Solar Energy Systems …………………………………. 8 WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS Definitions ……………………………………………………………………… 11 Notes: Small-Scale Wind Energy Systems ………………………………… 14 Notes: Medium-Scale Wind Energy Systems …………………………….. 14 Notes: Large-Scale Wind Energy Systems ……………………………….. 15 More on Noise …………………………………………………………………. 19 APPENDIX A: REFERENCE MATERIAL ………………………………………. 23 APPENDIX B: PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES … 27 Recommendations for Municipal Tools to Promote and Regulate the Deployment of Solar Energy Systems Roof-Mounted and Building-Integrated Solar Energy Systems Appropriate Locations. Roof-Mounted and Building-Integrated Solar Energy Systems should be permitted as-of-right on all other permitted buildings and structures throughout the community. Height. Roof-Mounted and Building-Integrated Solar Energy Systems should be required to meet the same height restrictions as any other building or structure.
  • Radar Impact Assessment

    Radar Impact Assessment

    Radar Impact Assessment Enabling Wind Farms Market Context Protecting Radar Across the world countries continue to embrace wind farm technology for both onshore and off shore applications. However, the presence of wind turbines can significantly impact the effectiveness of radar systems used across the meteorology, aviation and marine industries. All too often radar objections block or delay not only new wind farm developments, but also the repowering of existing ones, where the new, often larger, turbines deployed are considered to pose a greater impact risk. Consistent methods for modelling the potential impacts of wind farm developments on radar are critical. Decisions regarding development feasibility, or the proposal of relevant mitigation solutions, can only be made based upon accurate data. Over the past 15 years QinetiQ has accumulated extensive knowledge and experience in delivering independent expert analysis and advice, to both wind farm developers and radar safeguarders, enabling wind farm developments whilst protecting the integrity of radar systems. Your support in getting the two turbines approved at a planning appeal was excellent given that getting the radar element right was a critical part of the development. Was very impressed by the way this was managed by the Radar Impact Assessment team. David Connell, Loganwood Wind Ltd QinetiQ’s RIA team utilises state- of-the-art modelling software and Impact Assessment & Mitigation analytical expertise to take into account all relevant factors and scenarios, accurately demonstrating to developers and radar operators whether or not issues are likely to exist with planned developments. If any conflicts are predicted, QinetiQ’s RIA team can provide independent advice to both parties on the potential solutions to mitigate the impacts.
  • County Comprehensive Plan

    County Comprehensive Plan

    Lewis County COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NEW YORK October 6, 2009 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions Existing 2: Chapter INFRASTRUCTURE Figure 16: Electricity Generation Capacity by Source, 2006 Water and Sanitary Sewer Power & Utilities (see Map 10) According to New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) records, ten of the twelve public water supply systems in Lewis County have Unlike its more urbanized counterparts, Lewis County lacks contiguous available capacity. Notable exceptions include the Village of Port Leyden 4.1% 9.6% networks of water, sanitary sewer, and natural gas services primarily due 13.7% and the Village of Croghan which exceed available capacity during 20.8% periods of peak flow (see Tables 18 and 19). The Village of Lowville has to a small, sporadic population coupled with environmental limitations. 18.2% 13.0% the greatest excess capacity in terms of actual supply, with approximately Lewis County’s low population densities require extensive infrastructure 13.1% investments to service customers throughout the county. This equates to 62.1% Table 18: Lewis County Community Water Systems higher overall service costs to consumers. 43.7% It should be noted that the information on Map 10 represents locations for known infrastructure based on available information such as maps, Lewis County (519 MW) New York State (43,143 MW) GIS data, and personal accounts from municipal representatives. Due to the scale and breadth of this County Comprehensive Plan, it was Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration impractical to research and depict the full extent of utility and infrastructure penetration within each municipality. generated along the St.