DOCSLIB.ORG

2Nd EPR Romania 2010 V2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2Nd EPR Romania 2010 V2 ECE/CEP/166 UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS ROMANIA Second Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2012 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 37 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. In particular, the boundaries shown on the maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. The United Nations issued the first Environmental Performance Review of Romania (Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 13) in 2001. This volume is issued in English only. ECE/CEP/166 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales E.12.II.E.11 ISBN 978-92-1-117065-8 e-ISBN 978-92-1-055895-2 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword In 1993, Environmental Performance Reviews (EPRs) of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) were initiated at the second Environment for Europe Ministerial Conference in Lucerne, Switzerland. They were intended to cover the ECE States that are not members of the Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development. At the fifth Environment for Europe Ministerial Conference (Kiev, 2003), the Ministers affirmed their support for the EPR Programme, and decided that the Programme should continue with a second cycle of reviews. This second cycle, while assessing the progress made since the first review process, puts particular emphasis on implementation, integration, financing and the socio-economic interface with the environment. Through the peer review process, EPRs promote dialogue among ECE member States and the harmonization of environmental conditions and policies throughout the region. As a voluntary exercise, an EPR is undertaken only at the request of the country concerned. The studies are carried out by international teams of experts from the region working closely with national experts from the reviewed country. The teams also benefit from close cooperation with other organizations in the United Nations system, for instance the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). This is the second EPR of Romania published by ECE. The review takes stock of progress made by the country in the management of its environment since the country was first reviewed in 2001. It assesses the implementation of the recommendations in the first review (annex I). This second EPR also covers 10 issues of importance to the country related to policymaking, planning and implementation, the financing of environmental policies and projects, and the integration of environmental concerns into economic sectors, in particular sustainable management and protection of water resources, waste management, forestry, biodiversity and protected areas, and climate change. I hope that this second EPR will be useful in supporting policymakers and representatives of civil society in their efforts to improve environmental management and to further promote sustainable development in Romania, and that the lessons learned from the peer review process will also benefit other countries of the ECE region. Sven Alkalaj Executive Secretary Economic Commission for Europe v Preface The second EPR of Romania began in July 2011 with a preparatory mission. During this mission, the final structure of the report was discussed and established. A review mission took place on 15-22 November 2011. The international team taking part included experts from Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Republic of Moldova and Slovakia, as well as from UNEP and the ECE Secretariat. The draft EPR report was submitted to Romania for comments and to the ECE Expert Group on Environmental Performance Reviews for consideration in March 2012. During its meeting on 4-5 April 2012, the Expert Group discussed the report in detail with representatives of the Government of Romania, focusing, in particular, on the conclusions and recommendations made by the international experts. The EPR recommendations, with suggested amendments from the Expert Group, were then submitted for peer review to the eighteenth session of the ECE Committee on Environmental Policy on 18 April 2012. A delegation from Romania participated in the peer review. The Committee adopted the recommendations as set out in this report. The Committee on Environmental Policy and the ECE review team would like to thank the Government of Romania and its experts who worked with the international experts and contributed their knowledge and assistance. ECE wishes the Government of Romania further success in carrying out the tasks involved in meeting its environmental objectives, including the implementation of the recommendations in this second review. ECE would also like to express its appreciation to the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety and to the German Federal Environment Agency for their support of the EPR Programme through the Advisory Assistance Programme for Environmental Protection in the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia; to Germany, Italy and UNEP for having delegated their experts for the review; and to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) for its support of the EPR Programme and this review. vi Team of experts for the second EPR of Romania, 2011 vii LIST OF TEAM MEMBERS Mr. Antoine Nunes ECE Team Leader Mr. George Georgiadis ECE Project Coordinator Mr. Jyrki Hirvonen ECE Introduction Ms. Kalmanne Buzas Hungary Chapter 1 Mr. Valeriu Mosanu Republic of Moldova Chapter 2 Mr. Wondwosen Asnake UNEP Chapter 3 Mr. Alessandro Negrin Italy Chapter 4 Ms. Benedetta Dell’Anno Mr. Dieter Hesse Germany Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Mr. Franz Zwurtschek Germany Chapter 7 Mr. Juraj Farkaš Slovakia Chapter 8 Ms. Ivonne Higuero UNEP Chapter 9 Mr. Jyrki Hirvonen ECE Chapter 10 Mr. Mikhail Kokine, Chief of the Operational Activities and Review Section of the ECE Environment Division, undertook a full substantive review of this publication. Information cut-off date: 1 September 2012 ECE Information Unit Tel.: +41 (0)22 917 44 44 Palais des Nations Fax: +41 (0)22 917 05 05 CH-1211 Geneva 10 E-mail: [email protected] Switzerland Website: http://www.unece.org viii LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS National Contributors Ministry of Environment and Forests Ms. Diana Achimescu Ms. Cristian Apostol Mr. Flavius Ardelean Ms. Mirela Bagaianu Mr. Zsolt Bogos Ms. Cristina Bradu Ms. Liliana Bara Mr. Andrei Banu Ms. Liana Bojneagu Ms. Andreea Cazacioc Ms. Ramona Cherăscu Ms. Mihaela Ciobanu Mr. George Constantin Mr. Michail Costache Mr. Sorin Deaconu Ms. Ana Drapa Ms. Silvia Ene Ms. Alina Frim Ms. Luminita Ghita Ms. Simona Ghita Ms. Marilena Ghiu Mr. Constantin Hârjeu Mr. Dan Iacob Mr. Claudiu Ionescu Mr. Silvian Ionescu Ms. Cristiana Iorgulescu Mr. Nicolae Manta Mr. Iulian Matei Ms. Roxana Mihai Mr. Adrian Mindroiu Ms. Alexandra Mischie Ms. Dorina Mocanu Ms. Cristina Negulescu Ms. Maria Olteanu Ms. Mirela Pantilie Ms. Brindusa Petroaica Ms. Daniela Pineta Mr. Octavian Popescu Ms. Miriana Roman Ms. Nicola Rosu Ms. Cristina Raluca Stănică Mr. Andrei Sfirloaga Ms. Cristiana Surdu Ms. Cristina Sut Mr. Francisc Toba Ms. Maria-Daniela Toma Ms. Carmen Toader Ms. Amelia Turturean Mr. Florian Udrea Ms. Ileana Vasilescu Ms. Liliana Virtopeanu Mr. Kalman Zoltan ix Ms. Franciska Zsigmond Piatra Craiului National Park Mr. Mircea Verghelet Romanian Water Association Mr. Vasile Ciomos Mr. David Csaba Mr. Silviu Lacatusu Mr. Constantin Predoi Water Basin Administration Siret Mr. Vamanu Emil Water Basin Administration Pitesti Mr. Vasile Coman Ministry of Economy, Trade and the Business Environment Ms. Christiana Ion Mr. Alexandru Alexe Mr. Cornel Bobalca Mr. Victor Copaescu Mr. Nicolae Turdean Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure Ms. Rodica Ionica Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Ms. Emilia Teodorescu Ministry of Health Ms. Amalia Canton Environmental Fund Administration Mr. Cornel Brezuica National Institute of Statistics Prof. Constantin Mindricelu Ms. Simona Toma National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control Ms. Daniela Dogaru Ms. Cornelia Virtopeanu Apa Nova Bucharest, Operator water and waste water Mr. Chiru Epica Other Mr. Liviu Gheorghe International organizations United Nations Development Programme Ms. Yesim M. Oruc Kaya Mr. Doru Irimie x European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Ms. Venera Vlad Non-governmental and other organizations National Centre for Sustainable Development Ms. Olivia Popescu Mr. Calin Georgescu Eco-habitat Ms. Catalina Grigore Greenitiative Ms. Felicia Lenculescu Popovici Terra Mileniul III Ms. Lavinia Andrei xi Page CONTENTS Foreword .............................................................................................................................................................. iii Preface .................................................................................................................................................................. v List of team members ......................................................................................................................................... vii List of contributors ...........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • P501 Numerical Simulation of Wind Power Potential in Upstate New York
    P501 NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF WIND POWER POTENTIAL IN UPSTATE NEW YORK Robert Ballentine *, Scott Steiger and Daniel Phoenix State University of New York at Oswego 1. INTRODUCTION 2. METHODOLOGY Consistent with the national goal of moving away 2.1 Grid Arrangement from our dependence on carbon-based fuels, there is considerable interest in New York State in developing We are running the ARW-core of WRF on a wind power especially in areas with highest potential. doubly-nested grid (Fig. 1) to ensure that both large- The purpose of this research is to simulate low-level scale meteorological forcing and local geographical winds over upstate New York by running the Weather effects are well-represented. The grid spacings of the Research and Forecasting (WRF, Skamarock, et al large, intermediate and fine grids are 12 km, 4 km and 2005) model every day on a high-resolution (1.333 1.333 km respectively. We use 33 sigma levels where km) domain. Using the standard wind speed-versus- the lowest levels correspond to 10m, 40m and 80m power generation curve for a GE 1.5 MW wind above ground under typical meteorological conditions. turbine, we can estimate the monthly and seasonal We employ the Noah LSM and Yonsei PBL schemes. average wind power potential at all of our grid points (covering much of upstate New York and adjacent Lake Ontario). To determine the accuracy of WRF wind predictions, we are comparing winds simulated by WRF at 10 m AGL with hourly observations at three regularly reporting sites near Lake Ontario. 1.1 Brief Description of Wind Power Sites As of November 2009, New York State had more than 1200 MW of wind generating capacity from sites such as Horizon Wind Energy's Maple Ridge Wind Farm in Lewis County and farms operated by Noble Environmental Power in Clinton, Franklin and Wyoming Counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the State of New York Board on Electric
    15-F-0122 Sokolow Post Hearing Brief BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW YORK BOARD ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE ENVIRONMENT In the Matter of Baron Wind LLC Case 15-F-0122 INITIAL POST-HEARING BRIEF Alice Sokolow Case #15-F-0122 also for Parties: Thomas Flansburg Mary Ann McManus Bert Candee Virginia Gullam Dated: 4/15/2019 1 15-F-0122 Sokolow Post Hearing Brief TABLE OF CONTENTS I Introduction 2 II Facility 2 III Legal Background 2-3 IV. Issues- Fremont Wind Law 3 V. Nature of Env Impact-Avian & Bat 5 VI. Nature of Env Impact –Safety Exh1001.6 11 Exh 1001.15 29 VII Nature of Env Viewshed & Flicker 54 VIII Not Addressed 70 IX Conclusions 70 I Introduction We are five individual parties with grave concerns over conditions and completeness of Baron Winds Applications for a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need Pursuant to Article 10 to Construct a Wind Energy Facility. II. Facility Description Baron Winds LLC (the Applicant) is proposing to construct the Baron Winds Project, a wind energy generation facility and associated infrastructure (the Facility) in the Towns of Cohocton, Dansville, Fremont, and Wayland in Steuben County, New York (See Figure 1).The Facility will consist of up to 69 utility scale wind turbines with a total generating capacity of up to 242 Megawatts (MW). Other proposed components will include: access roads, buried collection lines, up to four permanent meteorological (met) towers, one operations and maintenance (O&M) building, up to two temporary construction staging/laydown areas, and a collection/point of interconnection.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Wind Energy in New York State
    Wind Energy Toolkit – Overview 2. Wind Energy in New York State 2.1. Market Drivers and Barriers Drivers for Wind Development in New York State Windy rural areas in the Northeast, such as those in Upstate and Western New York, have proved to be attractive to wind energy developers. Market drivers for wind development generally include an area’s proximity to major load centers, available electrical transmission capacity, and a good wind resource; regionally, drivers include the high costs of electrical energy in the Northeast, concerns over regional air quality, federal tax incentives, and legislative mandates in New York and neighboring states. Some specific factors that are driving the market for wind energy in New York include the following: • A good resource: New York State is ranked 15th in annual wind energy generating potential (7080 MW or approximately 62 billion kWh)—more than California or any state east of the Mississippi and the largest potential of any state in the Northeast.1 The location and relative strength of wind resources in New York State are shown in Figure 1. • State mandates: Renewable energy purchase mandates or renewable portfolio standards (RPS) in New York and neighboring states are driving the demand for new renewable resources in the region, particularly wind energy. Originally, the New York State RPS called for an increase in renewable energy used in the state from its then-current level of about 19% to 25% by the year 2013. In 2009, the RPS goal was expanded to 30% renewable energy by 2015. Wind energy is expected to supply a significant portion of the RPS requirement, which effectively creates a stable, long-term market for the retail sale of wind energy in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Radar Impact Assessment
    Radar Impact Assessment Enabling Wind Farms Market Context Protecting Radar Across the world countries continue to embrace wind farm technology for both onshore and off shore applications. However, the presence of wind turbines can significantly impact the effectiveness of radar systems used across the meteorology, aviation and marine industries. All too often radar objections block or delay not only new wind farm developments, but also the repowering of existing ones, where the new, often larger, turbines deployed are considered to pose a greater impact risk. Consistent methods for modelling the potential impacts of wind farm developments on radar are critical. Decisions regarding development feasibility, or the proposal of relevant mitigation solutions, can only be made based upon accurate data. Over the past 15 years QinetiQ has accumulated extensive knowledge and experience in delivering independent expert analysis and advice, to both wind farm developers and radar safeguarders, enabling wind farm developments whilst protecting the integrity of radar systems. Your support in getting the two turbines approved at a planning appeal was excellent given that getting the radar element right was a critical part of the development. Was very impressed by the way this was managed by the Radar Impact Assessment team. David Connell, Loganwood Wind Ltd QinetiQ’s RIA team utilises state- of-the-art modelling software and Impact Assessment & Mitigation analytical expertise to take into account all relevant factors and scenarios, accurately demonstrating to developers and radar operators whether or not issues are likely to exist with planned developments. If any conflicts are predicted, QinetiQ’s RIA team can provide independent advice to both parties on the potential solutions to mitigate the impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • County Comprehensive Plan
    Lewis County COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NEW YORK October 6, 2009 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions Existing 2: Chapter INFRASTRUCTURE Figure 16: Electricity Generation Capacity by Source, 2006 Water and Sanitary Sewer Power & Utilities (see Map 10) According to New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) records, ten of the twelve public water supply systems in Lewis County have Unlike its more urbanized counterparts, Lewis County lacks contiguous available capacity. Notable exceptions include the Village of Port Leyden 4.1% 9.6% networks of water, sanitary sewer, and natural gas services primarily due 13.7% and the Village of Croghan which exceed available capacity during 20.8% periods of peak flow (see Tables 18 and 19). The Village of Lowville has to a small, sporadic population coupled with environmental limitations. 18.2% 13.0% the greatest excess capacity in terms of actual supply, with approximately Lewis County’s low population densities require extensive infrastructure 13.1% investments to service customers throughout the county. This equates to 62.1% Table 18: Lewis County Community Water Systems higher overall service costs to consumers. 43.7% It should be noted that the information on Map 10 represents locations for known infrastructure based on available information such as maps, Lewis County (519 MW) New York State (43,143 MW) GIS data, and personal accounts from municipal representatives. Due to the scale and breadth of this County Comprehensive Plan, it was Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration impractical to research and depict the full extent of utility and infrastructure penetration within each municipality. generated along the St.
    [Show full text]
  • (NYS) Pre-Filed Hearing Exhibit NYS000089, NYSERDA, New York
    New York State Renewable Portfolio Standard Performance Report Program Period ending March 2007 Released in August 2007 The N ew York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) OAGI0000277_000001 Executive Summary From January 1,2006 through the first quarter of2007 ("the reporting period"), NY SERDA and the Department of Public Service have taken several actions to implement the New York State Renewable Portfolio Standard program (RPS). Some of the major actions include the acceptance of two facilities into the RPS program as Maintenance Resources 1 and the completion of a second Main Tier competitive solicitation. In addition to the major actions taken by NYSERDA and the Department of Public Service to implement the RPS, several contracts from the first RPS Main Tier solicitation commenced during the reporting period. The 19 Megawatt ("MW") Lyonsdale Biomass plant located in Lewis County, NY and the 20 MW Boralex Biomass plant located in Franklin County, NY were both accepted into the RPS program as Maintenance Resources during the reporting period. As a result of the financial support that will be provided to these two plants under the RPS, New York will enjoy the retention of39 MW of valuable base load energy capacity along with several dozen full and part time jobs. During calendar year 2006, NY SERDA paid production incentives on approximately 582,000 Megawatt hours ("MWh") of production from five renewable energy facilities awarded contracts from the first Main Tier solicitation. While contractors from this solicitation were required to build 254 MW of new renewable capacity, more than 344 MW was actually built and is currently operating.
    [Show full text]
  • North Ridge Wind Farm St
    Preliminary Scoping Statement North Ridge Wind Farm St. Lawrence County, New York Prepared For: Atlantic Wind LLC 2 Radnor Corp. Ctr., Ste. 200 100 Matsonford Road Radnor, PA 19087 Contact: Jenny L. Briot P. (315)-399-0486 [email protected] Prepared by: Environmental Design & Research, Landscape Architecture, Engineering & Environmental Services, D.P.C. 217 Montgomery Street, Suite 1000 Syracuse, New York 13202 P. 315.471.0688 May 2017 PRELIMINARY SCOPING STATEMENT North Ridge Wind Farm St. Lawrence County, New York Prepared For: Atlantic Wind LLC 2 Radnor Corp. Ctr., Ste. 200 100 Matsonford Road Radnor, PA 19087 Contact: Jenny L. Briot Phone: (315)-399-0486 [email protected] Prepared By: Environmental Design & Research, Landscape Architecture, Engineering & Environmental Services, D.P.C. 217 Montgomery Street, Suite 1000 Syracuse, New York 13202 Contact: Ben Brazell Phone: (315) 471-0688 May 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 FACILITY DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 FACILITY BENEFITS ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 SUMMARY OF PRE-APPLICATION ACTIVITIES........................................................................................ 4 1.4 POTENTIAL
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Construction Avian and Bat Mortality Monitoring at the Alta X Wind Energy Project Kern County, California
    Post-Construction Avian and Bat Mortality Monitoring at the Alta X Wind Energy Project Kern County, California Final Report for the Second Year of Operation April 2015 – April 2016 Prepared for Alta Wind X, LLC 14633 Willow Springs Road Mojave, California 93501 Prepared by: Joel Thompson, Carmen Boyd, and John Lombardi Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. 415 West 17th Street, Suite 200 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 July 22, 2016 Alta X Year 2 Final Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Alta Wind X, LLC (Alta Wind X) has constructed a wind energy facility in Kern County, California, referred to as the Alta X Wind Energy Project (“Alta X” or “Project”). Consistent with the Alta East Wind Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), Alta Wind X is committed to conducting avian and bat mortality monitoring at the Project during the first, second, and third years of operation. Following construction in the spring of 2014, Alta Wind X contracted Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) to develop and implement a study protocol for post- construction monitoring at the Project for the purpose of estimating the impacts of the wind energy facility on birds and bats. The following report describes the methods and results of mortality monitoring conducted during the second year of operation of the Project, April 2015 to April 2016. As stated in the DEIR, the goal of the mortality monitoring study is determine the level of incidental injury and mortality to populations of avian or bat species in the vicinity of the Project. To this end, WEST designed and implemented a 3-year study to determine the level of bird and bat mortality attributable to collisions with wind turbines at the facility on an annual basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Energy Needs of the Empire State Plaza Without Fossil Fuels
    Meeting Energy Needs of the Empire State Plaza Without Fossil Fuels Sheridan Hollow Alliance for Renewable Energy Science Committee July 11, 2019 1 I. INTRODUCTION The Sheridan Hollow Alliance for Renewable Energy (SHARE) is a coalition of individuals, experts, organizations, and environmental justice advocates with a common purpose of ensuring that energy needs of the Empire State Plaza in Albany, New York are met with renewables rather than fossil fuels burned in Sheridan Hollow. This report discusses feasible renewable energy alternatives to a fossil fuel microgrid project proposed by the New York Power Authority (NYPA) and Office of General Services (OGS). It refutes inaccurate or misleading information, and it challenges agencies to think outside the box of a system architecture that relies predominately on fracked gas for heat and power. Drawing upon knowledge from allies with expertise in the design and retrofit of large scale systems, the document re-envisions the concept of a microgrid within a larger network of renewable resources, describing how energy needs can be met during normal operation while also ensuring that provisions exist for resiliency during emergencies. As explained in the report, this involves converting the Plaza's antiquated steam-based system of heating and cooling to far more efficient geothermal and thermal load-sharing technology, as well as the deployment of renewables for electricity— both locally and outside of the downtown area. Significantly, this year the Governor and legislature amended language within the state budget to require the use of renewable energy to heat, cool, and power the Empire State Plaza to the extent possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Carbon Emis from Energy
    TacTacklingkling ClimateClimate ChangeChange inin thethe U.S.U.S. PPotentialotential CarbonCarbon EmissionsEmissions ReductionsReductions fromfrom EnergyEnergy EfficiencyEfficiency andand RRenewableenewable EnergyEnergy byby 20302030 American Solar Energy Society Charles F. Kutscher, Editor January 2007 Front cover: A stream of melt water cascades off the vast Arctic ice sheet that covers Greenland. Scientists attribute acceleration in the melting of ice sheets to global warming. Photo © Roger Braithwaite/Peter Arnold, Inc. Back Cover: © Dean Jenkins/morguefile.com. The publishers of this report gratefully acknowledge Roger Braithwaite and Peter Arnold, Inc., for their generosity and commitment to sustaining our world. Editorial and Design Services, McIntyre Communications Inc. www.McComm.com • [email protected] Ê Printed with soy-based ink on recycled paper. Tackling Climate Change in the U.S. Potential Carbon Emissions Reductions from Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by 2030 Charles F. Kutscher, Editor American Solar Energy Society Tackling Climate Change • Searchable PDF at www.ases.org/climatechange Table of Contents FOREWORD . .i by James Hansen, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . .iii by Brad Collins LIST OF FIGURES . .v LIST OF TABLES . .xii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . .1 by Charles F. Kutscher, Ph.D., P.E. OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY OF THE STUDIES . .7 by Charles F. Kutscher, Ph.D., P.E. Introduction 9 Putting the Challenge in Context 10 Project Description 12 Summary of the Analyses 14 Energy Efficiency 14 Overall Energy Efficiency 14 Buildings 15 Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles 16 Renewable Energy 17 Concentrating Solar Power 17 Photovoltaics (PV) 20 Wind Power 22 Biomass 25 Biofuels 28 Geothermal Power 30 Summary of Contributions 32 Conclusions 37 ENERGY EFFICIENCY OVERALL ENERGY EFFICIENCY .
    [Show full text]
  • Fire and Ice: World Renewable Energy and Carbon Control Mechanisms Confront Constitutional Barriers
    Ferrey_final_cpcxns.doc 2/22/2010 9:33:43 AM FIRE AND ICE: WORLD RENEWABLE ENERGY AND CARBON CONTROL MECHANISMS CONFRONT CONSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS STEVEN FERREY* CHAD LAURENT** CAMERON FERREY*** Some say the world will end in fire, Some say in ice . .And [either] would suffice. 1 —Robert Frost ABSTRACT Fire and ice will forge the future of the world. The constitutional battle in the United States vis-à-vis global warming will determine the future of fire and ice. The electric sector of the economy holds the key; a fundamental transition to renewable energy is necessary to create a sustainable economy and abate global warming. As of 2009, ten U.S. states are vigorously moving toward implementing a feed-in tariff regulatory mechanism similar to those adopted previously by eighteen * Professor of Law, Suffolk University Law School. Professor Ferrey has served as primary legal advisor to the World Bank and to the U.N. on global warming and renewable energy policy in developing countries. He is the author of six books on energy and environmental policy including the 2006 book RENEWABLE POWER IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: WINNING THE WAR ON GLOBAL WARMING, as well as chapters in two recent books on climate change and climate change articles published by Stanford, University of California at Berkeley, Boston College, and New York University. ** Juris Doctor expected May 2009, Suffolk University Law School. Project Consultant with Meister Consultants Group, Inc. in Boston. Former Manager of Renewable Energy Programs at Massachusetts Energy Consumer Alliance. Former Research Associate at Environmental Defense Fund. *** President of Computers Across Borders, a non-profit NGO distributing computers to schools in developing countries on three continents that operate on renewable energy.
    [Show full text]
  • GIS for Renewable Energy
    GIS Best Practices GIS for Renewable Energy January 2010 Table of Contents What Is GIS? 1 GIS for Renewable Energy 3 U.S. DOE's Renewable Energy Lab Maps Wind Resources with GIS 5 The Big Sky State Taps Wind Resources 9 Boston Showcases Solar Power Potential with Web GIS 15 Assessing Economic Biomass Resources in California with GIS 19 A Bright Future at Puget Sound Energy 23 Building an Oasis in the Desert 31 Mapping the Solar Potential of Rooftops 39 Renewable Energy—No Longer the Impossible Dream! 43 i What Is GIS? Making decisions based on geography is basic to human thinking. Where shall we go, what will it be like, and what shall we do when we get there are applied to the simple event of going to the store or to the major event of launching a bathysphere into the ocean's depths. By understanding geography and people's relationship to location, we can make informed decisions about the way we live on our planet. A geographic information system (GIS) is a technological tool for comprehending geography and making intelligent decisions. GIS organizes geographic data so that a person reading a map can select data necessary for a specifi c project or task. A thematic map has a table of contents that allows the reader to add layers of information to a basemap of real-world locations. For example, a social analyst might use the basemap of Eugene, Oregon, and select datasets from the U.S. Census Bureau to add data layers to a map that shows residents' education levels, ages, and employment status.
    [Show full text]