DOCSLIB.ORG

Jericho Rise Wind Farm Towns of Chateaugay and Bellmont Franklin County, New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jericho Rise Wind Farm Towns of Chateaugay and Bellmont Franklin County, New York SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (SEIS) FOR THE Jericho Rise Wind Farm Towns of Chateaugay and Bellmont Franklin County, New York Co-lead Agencies: Town of Chateaugay and Bellmont Applicant: Jericho Rise Windfarm, LLC 808 Travis Street, Suite 700 Houston, Texas 77002 Contact: Aron Branam Phone: (503)-535-1519 Prepared By: Environmental Design & Research, Landscape Architecture, Engineering & Environmental Services, D.P.C. 217 Montgomery Street, Suite 1000 Syracuse, New York 13202 Contact: John Hecklau Phone: (315) 471-0688 Date of DEIS Submittal: February, 2008 Date of DEIS Acceptance: February, 2008 Date of SEIS Submittal: November 10, 2015 Date of SEIS Acceptance: December 7, 2015 Public Comment Period: December 9, 2015 – January 11, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PROJECT SUMMARY/INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2.1 Project Participation .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 PROJECT FACILITY OWNER/DEVELOPER/OPERATOR ........................................................................... 4 1.4 PROJECT PURPOSE, NEED, AND BENEFIT .............................................................................................. 4 1.4.1 Project Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.2 Public Need and Benefits to Be Derived From Project .............................................................................. 5 1.5 PROJECT FACILITY LAYOUT AND COMPONENTS ................................................................................. 11 1.5.1 Facility Layout Criteria ............................................................................................................................. 11 1.5.2 Roads and Civil Construction Work ......................................................................................................... 11 1.5.3 Turbine Tower Foundations .................................................................................................................... 12 1.5.4 Wind Turbine Generators and Central Control System ........................................................................... 12 1.5.5 Electrical Collection System Infrastructure .............................................................................................. 12 1.5.6 Interconnection Substation Facilities ....................................................................................................... 13 1.5.7 Project Grounding System ...................................................................................................................... 13 1.5.8 Meteorological Monitoring Station Towers .............................................................................................. 13 1.5.9 Operations and Maintenance Facility ...................................................................................................... 13 1.6 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 13 1.7 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE .......................................................................................................... 15 1.8 DECOMMISSIONING .................................................................................................................................. 16 1.9 PROJECT COST AND FUNDING ............................................................................................................... 16 1.10 PERMITS AND APPROVALS REQUIRED .................................................................................................. 17 1.11 PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT ..................................................................................................... 19 1.12 SEQRA PROCESS ...................................................................................................................................... 19 1.12.1 Agency and Public Review ................................................................................................................... 20 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION ...................................................................................................... 21 2.1 GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY & SOILS ......................................................................................................... 21 2.1.1 Geology and Topography ........................................................................................................................ 21 2.1.2 Soils ........................................................................................................................................................ 23 2.2 WATER RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................ 29 2.2.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................. 29 2.2.2 Anticipated Impacts ................................................................................................................................. 35 2.2.3 Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................................................ 41 2.3 BIOLOGICAL, TERRESTRIAL & AQUATIC ECOLOGY.............................................................................. 43 2.3.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................. 43 2.3.2 Potential Impacts ..................................................................................................................................... 57 2.3.3 Mitigation ................................................................................................................................................. 66 2.4 CLIMATE & AIR QUALITY ........................................................................................................................... 67 2.4.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................. 67 2.4.2 Potential Impacts ..................................................................................................................................... 69 2.4.3 Proposed Mitigation ................................................................................................................................ 71 2.5 AESTHETIC & VISUAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................................ 71 2.5.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................. 71 2.5.2 Anticipated Impacts ................................................................................................................................. 77 2.5.3 Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................................................ 89 Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Jericho Rise Wind Farm ii 2.6 HISTORIC, CULTURAL & ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES .................................................................... 92 2.6.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................. 92 2.6.2 Anticipated Impacts ................................................................................................................................. 94 2.6.3 Proposed Mitigation ................................................................................................................................ 98 2.7 SOUND ...................................................................................................................................................... 100 2.7.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................ 101 2.7.2 Anticipated Impacts ............................................................................................................................... 103 2.7.3 Mitigation ............................................................................................................................................... 112 2.8 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION .............................................................................................................. 113 2.8.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................ 113 2.8.2 Anticipated Impacts ..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wind Turbine Related Noise: Current Knowledge and Research Needs
    New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Wind Turbine-Related Noise: Current Knowledge and Research Needs June 2013 NYSERDA Report 13-14 for Energy NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Our Mission: Advance innovative energy solutions in ways that improve New York’s economy and environment. Our Vision: Serve as a catalyst—advancing energy innovation and technology, transforming New York’s economy, empowering people to choose clean and efficient energy as part of their everyday lives. Our Core Values: Objectivity, integrity, public service, partnership and innovation. Our Portfolios NYSERDA programs are organized into five portfolios, each representing a complementary group of offerings with common areas of energy-related focus and objectives. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Deployment Energy and the Environment Helping to assess and mitigate the environmental impacts of Helping New York to achieve its aggressive energy efficiency and energy production and use – including environmental research renewable energy goals – including programs to motivate increased and development, regional initiatives to improve environmental efficiency in energy consumption by consumers (residential, sustainability and West Valley Site Management. commercial, municipal, institutional, industrial, and transportation), to increase production by renewable power suppliers, to support Energy Data, Planning and Policy market
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy in NY State
    2010 New York State Wind Energy Study Final Report Source: Milian, Chris; www.photosfromonhigh.com Submitted by: Christina Hoerig Kimballe Campbell Daniel Grew Nicole Gumbs Happiness Munedzimwe Sandeep George Jun Wan Timothy Komsa Karl Smolenski Tyler Coatney Cornell University II Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................II List of Figures .................................................................................................................... VI List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... VII 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................. VIII 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................10 3 New York State Present Energy Supply/Demand ....................................................14 3.1 New York Energy Background ............................................................................14 3.2 Current NYS Wind Power ...................................................................................16 3.3 Near Term Growth of New York State Wind Power .............................................17 3.4 Progress of Other Renewables in New York State ..............................................19 3.5 Power Demand in Tompkins County ...................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Madison County Renewable Energy Trail Map
    2016 Madison County Renewable Energy Trail Map Welcome to the updated Madison County Renewable Energy Trail map. This map highlights the current innovative sustainability projects located in Madison County and is meant to be used as a guide to learn more about each of these initiatives. Sustainability is a concept that values all the assets of a community; environmentally, socially, and economically. This helps us recognize that communities gain more when those assets are leveraged together. Natural resources are one of Madison County’s strongest assets. Many of these projects showcase ways these natural resources are converted to natural assets: wind, solar, biomass, hydro and landfill gas are being used to create clean energy alternatives that promote the local economy. Madison County is home to several LEED certified buildings, the highest achievable standard for environmentally friendly design, as well as several cutting edge technologies including the only municipality with a flexible photovoltaic film cap over its landfill. The county also contains the FREE Center, an educational building with many different renewable technologies on display and tours for the public. These places and projects serve as important educational resources, many of which are open to the public and/or available for tours. Use this guide to learn more about how to visit these destinations first hand! Advancing these technologies and initiatives is a priority in Madison County. Madison County is fortunate to have so many forward thinking institutions, businesses, and individuals that are dedicated to looking beyond the status quo. These types of projects are creating a momentum that establishes Madison County as a leader in sustainable energy projects and brings new vitality to our communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Matters U.S
    SUSTAINABILITY MATTERS U.S. General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Office of Applied Science 1800 F Street, NW Washington, DC 20405 For more information: www.gsa.gov SUSTAINABILITY MATTERS U.S. General Services Administration 2008 1 MESSAGE FROM THE ACTING ADMINISTRATOR TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 MESSAGE FROM THE COMMISSIONER 4 INTRODUCTION 8 The Case for Sustainability CASE STUDY: SAN FRANCISCO FEDERAL BUILDING, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 34 The Greenest Alternative CASE STUDY: HOWARD M. METZENBAUM U.S. COURTHOUSE, CLEVELAND, OHIO 52 Cost, Value, and Procurement of Green Buildings CASE STUDY: EPA REGION 8 HEADQUARTERS, DENVER, COLORADO STRATEGIES 74 Energy Efficiency CASE STUDY: BISHOP HENRY WHIPPLE FEDERAL BUILDING, FORT SNELLING, MINNESOTA 100 Site and Water CASE STUDY: NOAA SATELLITE OPERATIONS FACILITY, SUITLAND, MARYLAND 118 Indoor Environmental Quality CASE STUDY: ALFRED A. ARRAJ U.S. COURTHOUSE, DENVER, COLORADO 140 Materials CASE STUDY: CARL T. CURTIS MIDWEST REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS, OMAHA, NEBRASKA 156 Operations and Maintenance CASE STUDY: JOHN J. DUNCAN FEDERAL BUILDING, KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE 182 Beyond GSA: The Greening of America CONVERSATIONS AND REFLECTIONS: BOB BERKEBILE, FAIA, AND BOB FOX, AIA 194 Moving Forward: The Challenges Ahead 204 GSA LEED BUILDINGS 211 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS THE HUMAN RACE IS CHALLENGED MORE THAN EVER BEFORE TO DEMONSTRATE OUR MASTERY— NOT OVER NATURE, BUT OURSELVES. RACHEL CARSON MESSAGE FROM THE ACTING ADMINISTRATOR For more than 30 years, the General Services Administration (GSA) has set the standard for sustainable, high-quality workplaces that improve productivity, revitalize communities, encourage environmental responsibility and promote intelligent decision making with respect to energy use. Sustainability has been an evolving theme for GSA beginning with energy efficiency initiatives, resulting from the oil embargo, in the early 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Tools to Promote and Regulate the Deployment of Renewable Energy Systems
    TOOLS TO PROMOTE AND REGULATE THE DEPLOYMENT OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS Recommendations for Municipalities June 2017 in Tompkins County The deployment of renewable energy systems can have considerable land use implications. The Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability has prepared this report to help assist municipalities as they work to prepare and to update their land use regulation of solar and wind energy systems. Tools to Promote and Regulate the Deployment of Renewable Energy Systems Recommendations for Municipalities in Tompkins County TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY Recommendations for Solar Energy Systems Roof-Mounted and Building-Integrated Accessory Ground-Mounted Large-Scale Recommendations for Wind Energy Systems Small-Scale Medium-Scale Large-Scale INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………….. 1 THE ROLE OF TOMPKINS COUNTY ……………………………………………… 2 SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS Definitions ………………………………………………………………………. 5 Notes: Roof-Mounted and Building-Integrated Solar Energy Systems … 7 Notes: Accessory Ground-Mounted Solar Energy Systems ……………… 7 Notes: Large-Scale Solar Energy Systems …………………………………. 8 WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS Definitions ……………………………………………………………………… 11 Notes: Small-Scale Wind Energy Systems ………………………………… 14 Notes: Medium-Scale Wind Energy Systems …………………………….. 14 Notes: Large-Scale Wind Energy Systems ……………………………….. 15 More on Noise …………………………………………………………………. 19 APPENDIX A: REFERENCE MATERIAL ………………………………………. 23 APPENDIX B: PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES … 27 Recommendations for Municipal Tools to Promote and Regulate the Deployment of Solar Energy Systems Roof-Mounted and Building-Integrated Solar Energy Systems Appropriate Locations. Roof-Mounted and Building-Integrated Solar Energy Systems should be permitted as-of-right on all other permitted buildings and structures throughout the community. Height. Roof-Mounted and Building-Integrated Solar Energy Systems should be required to meet the same height restrictions as any other building or structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Usa Wind Energy Resources
    USA WIND ENERGY RESOURCES © M. Ragheb 2/7/2021 “An acre of windy prairie could produce between $4,000 and $10,000 worth of electricity per year.” Dennis Hayes INTRODUCTION Wind power accounted for 6 percent of the USA’s total electricity generation capacity, compared with 19 percent for Nuclear Power generation. A record 13.2 GWs of rated wind capacity were installed in 2012 including 5.5 GWs in December 2012, the most ever for a single month. The total rated wind capacity stands at about 60 GWs. Utilities are buying wind power because they want to, not because they have to, to benefit from the Production Tax Credit PTC incentive. The credit has been extended for a year to cover wind farms that start construction in 2013. Previously it only covered projects that started working by the expiration date. Asset financing for USA wind farms was $4.3 billion in the second-half compared with $9.6 billion in the first six months of 2012. Component makers are the General Electric Company (GE), Siemens AG, Vestas AS, Gamesa Corp Tecnologica SA and Clipper Windpower Ltd., which is owned by Platinum Equity LLC. Equipment prices for wind have dropped by more than 21 percent since 2010, and the performance of turbines has risen. This has resulted in a 21 percent decrease in the overall cost of electricity from wind for a typical USA project since 2010. From 2006 to 2012 USA domestic manufacturing facilities for wind turbine components has grown 12 times to more than 400 facilities in 43 states.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Farms in Your Community
    Wind Farms in Your Community David G. Loomis, Ph.D. Director, Center for Renewable Energy Professor of Economics Illinois State University University of Illinois Extension Teleconference: Siting & Permitting Wind Farms in Illinois April 19, 2012 IL Wind Working Group The IWWG is an organization whose purposes are to communicate wind opportunities honestly and objectively, to interact with various stakeholders at the local, state, regional and national levels, and to promote economic development of wind energy in the state of Illinois. IL Wind Working Group Part of the U. S. Department of Energy’s Wind Powering America Program One of 34 state wind working groups across the country Partially funded by a grant from the U. S. Department of Energy Comprised of over 150 stakeholders in Illinois wind energy Hosted by Illinois State University Illinois Wind Working Group Website: www.renewableenergy.ilstu.edu/wind/ Annual Wind Conference, July 17- 18, 2012, Normal, IL …works to meet the growing need for education, outreach and research in the area of renewable energy. Three major functional areas: to enhance the renewable energy major at Illinois State University; to serve the Illinois renewable energy community by providing information to the public; to encourage applied research concerning renewable energy at Illinois State University and through collaborations with other universities. Why Wind Energy Benefits of Wind Projects Revitalizes Rural Economies Creates Jobs Promotes Cost-Effective Energy Production Supports Agriculture
    [Show full text]
  • Public Version – Priviledged and Confidential Information Has Been Removed Pursuant to 18 C.F.R § 388.112
    PUBLIC VERSION – PRIVILEDGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REMOVED PURSUANT TO 18 C.F.R § 388.112 C IMARRON B END W IND P ROJECT I, LLC Megan Beauregard Senior Associate General Counsel [email protected] 978-296-6822 November 2, 2016 BY ELECTRONIC FILING Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Re: Cimarron Bend Wind Project I, LLC, LLC EC17-____-000 Cimarron Bend Assets, LLC Joint Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act, Request for Expedited Consideration and Confidential Treatment Dear Secretary Bose: Enclosed for filing is the “Joint Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act for the Disposition of Jurisdictional Facilities, Request for Expedited Consideration and Confidential Treatment” (the “Application”) which is being submitted on behalf of Cimarron Bend Wind Project, I, LLC (“CB I”) and Cimarron Bend Assets, LLC (“CB Assets,” and together, “Applicants”). Applicants respectfully request confidential treatment of Exhibit I to the Application pursuant to Section 388.112 of the Commission’s Regulations. Exhibit I contains commercial information that is privileged and confidential and not publicly available. Applicant is submitting a confidential, non-public version of this Application marked “CONTAINS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – DO NOT RELEASE” and a public version of this Application. Pursuant to 18 C.F.R. § 33.9, a proposed protective order and non-disclosure certificate are attached to the filing as Attachment 1. PUBLIC VERSION – PRIVILEDGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REMOVED PURSUANT TO 18 C.F.R § 388.112 Honorable Kimberly D.
    [Show full text]
  • Tools to Promote and Regulate the Deployment of Renewable Energy Systems
    TOOLS TO PROMOTE AND REGULATE THE DEPLOYMENT OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS Recommendations for Municipalities June 2017 in Tompkins County The deployment of renewable energy systems can have considerable land use implications. The Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability has prepared this report to help assist municipalities as they work to prepare and to update their land use regulation of solar and wind energy systems. Tools to Promote and Regulate the Deployment of Renewable Energy Systems Recommendations for Municipalities in Tompkins County TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY Recommendations for Solar Energy Systems Roof-Mounted and Building-Integrated Accessory Ground-Mounted Large-Scale Recommendations for Wind Energy Systems Small-Scale Medium-Scale Large-Scale INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………….. 1 THE ROLE OF TOMPKINS COUNTY ……………………………………………… 2 SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS Definitions ………………………………………………………………………. 5 Notes: Roof-Mounted and Building-Integrated Solar Energy Systems … 7 Notes: Accessory Ground-Mounted Solar Energy Systems ……………… 7 Notes: Large-Scale Solar Energy Systems …………………………………. 8 WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS Definitions ……………………………………………………………………… 11 Notes: Small-Scale Wind Energy Systems ………………………………… 14 Notes: Medium-Scale Wind Energy Systems …………………………….. 14 Notes: Large-Scale Wind Energy Systems ……………………………….. 15 More on Noise …………………………………………………………………. 19 APPENDIX A: REFERENCE MATERIAL ………………………………………. 23 APPENDIX B: PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES … 27 Recommendations for Municipal Tools to Promote and Regulate the Deployment of Solar Energy Systems Roof-Mounted and Building-Integrated Solar Energy Systems Appropriate Locations. Roof-Mounted and Building-Integrated Solar Energy Systems should be permitted as-of-right on all other permitted buildings and structures throughout the community. Height. Roof-Mounted and Building-Integrated Solar Energy Systems should be required to meet the same height restrictions as any other building or structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvest the Wind: a Wind Energy Handbook for Illinois
    Harvest the Wind: A Wind Energy Handbook for Illinois Handbook for Wind Energy A Wind: Harvest the Harvest the Wind: A Wind Energy Handbook for Illinois 2004 Harvest the Wind A Wind Energy Handbook for Illinois by Lisa M. Daniels Executive Director Sarah E. Johnson Program Associate Wes Slaymaker Project Engineer Prepared by for the Illinois Value-Added Rural Development Center, a division of the Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs at Western Illinois University 2004 Acknowledgements The Windustry authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of those who worked on the first edition of Harvest the Wind published as a limited edition in 1997. First Edition Principal Contributors and Reviewers: Rory Artig, Don Bain, Lisa Daniels, Skip DeLong, Paulo Dini, John Dunlop, Paul Gipe, Rick Halet, Brian Parsons, Michael Noble, Michael Tennis, and Tom Wind About Windustry Windustry is a nonprofit organization that works hands-on with local and community- based wind projects, providing technical support to create an understanding of wind energy opportunities for rural economic benefit. This work helps lay the foundation to build markets for locally owned wind projects in the Midwest as well as to help rural landowners and communities benefit more from corporate owned wind projects. Windustry, through its work with Wind Powering America, a U.S. Department of Energy initiative, the National Wind Coordinating Committee (NWCC), and Windustry’s new Wind Farmers Network, is working to create a wind energy knowledge base in rural communities around the Midwest. As part of this effort, Windustry organizes state, regional, and national wind energy forums aimed at moving the wind energy policy and project development dialogue forward, especially regarding community wind projects.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Wind Energy
    Focus on global markets 17 Focus on Global Markets As Global Windpower 2004 opens in Chicago, Wind Directions assesses the international wind energy market. Will the tech- nology’s remarkable growth rate be sustained, where will expansion occur over the next ten years, and what are the prospects in the biggest market of all outside Europe, the United States? In the following pages, we look at two new market surveys from Denmark and Germany, outline the European Wind Energy Association’s own expectations for the next decade, and finally examine the future for wind power in the host nation for Global Windpower. Photo: Navitas Energy Windy City 50 MW wind farm at Mendota Hills, Illinois. Welcomes Global Windpower Famously nicknamed the “windy city”, Chicago, Illinois could hardly be a more appropriate venue for this month’s Global Windpower 2004 Conference and Exhibition. The industry’s largest event ever in the United States, over 3,000 wind industry professionals and visitors from all over the world are expected to attend. This is the first time that the Global nisms and the offshore potential. There will also be a forum of manufacturers’ representa- Windpower series has crossed the tives and panel discussions about, among other subjects, opportunities in developing coun- Atlantic. The three day conference, run- tries, R&D, forecasting techniques and media coverage. ning from March 29 to 31, has been organised by the American Wind Energy Finance issues will feature prominently. “This is one of several key areas that we have iden- Association in conjunction with EWEA, the tified as critical to the wind industry's future growth, and we will be using this conference to Indian Wind Turbine Manufacturers begin the process of educating the financial community about the industry’s potential and the Association and the Australian Wind returns it can deliver to investors,” said AWEA Executive Director Randall Swisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Government Building Operational Costs Through Innovation and Effi- Ciency: Legislative Solutions
    S. HRG. 110–1045 REDUCING GOVERNMENT BUILDING OPERATIONAL COSTS THROUGH INNOVATION AND EFFI- CIENCY: LEGISLATIVE SOLUTIONS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 28, 2007 Printed for the use of the Committee on Environment and Public Works ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress.senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 55–924 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION BARBARA BOXER, California, Chairman MAX BAUCUS, Montana JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut JOHN W. WARNER, Virginia THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, New York JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey DAVID VITTER, Louisiana BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland LARRY E. CRAIG, Idaho BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota CRAIG THOMAS, Wyoming SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri BETTINA POIRIER, Majority Staff Director and Chief Counsel ANDREW WHEELER, Minority Staff Director (II) CONTENTS Page MARCH 28, 2007 OPENING STATEMENTS Boxer, Hon. Barbara, U.S. Senator from the State of California ........................ 1 Inhofe, Hon. James M., U.S. Senator from the State of Oklahoma .................... 3 Alexander, Hon. Lamar, U.S. Senator from the State of Tennessee ................... 4 Sanders, Hon. Bernard, U.S. Senator from the State of Vermont ......................
    [Show full text]