Have German Will Travel Sprache

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

HAVE GERMAN WILL TRAVEL SPRACHE DEUTSCH / GERMAN language: die Sprache, die Sprachen dialect: die Mundart, die Mundarten der Dialekt, die Dialekte slang: die Umgangssprache, die Umgangssprachen die Sondersprache, die Sondersprachen Low German (Plattdiiiitsch) G ERMANY'S SECOND UNGUAGE. Platt deutsch or Low German, is undergoing scholarly documentation in order to "Low" in this case just means the lowlands of preserve its cuftural values for future generations. A comprehensive study of northern Germany, in contrast to the -writ~ n and spoken Plattdeutsch (also highlands of the Alps. Although this dialect is called Niederdeutsch) is being made by the recently established lnstitut fiir also slowly fading away, many speakers still niederdeutsche Sprache in Bremen. see it as a part of their proud heritage, even Although High German is the lingua franca of G erman-speaking areas going so far as to consider it its own language today, scholars consider it important to protect the ro le historically allotted to rather than a dialect. Low German-which, as its name im plies, is the popular usage in the lowlands. Low German Middle Low German was the lingua franca of the Hanseatic League. It was the predominant language in Northern Germany. This changed in the 16th century, when in 1534 the Luther Bible by Martin Luther was printed. This translation is considered to be an important step towards the evolution of the Early New High German. It aimed to be understandable to a broad audience and was based mainly on Central and Upper German varieties. The Early New High German language gained more prestige than Low Saxon and became the language of science and literature. Other factors were that around the same time, the Hanseatic league lost its importance as new trade routes to Asia and the Americas were established, and that the most powerful German states of that period were located in Middle and Southern Germany. The 18th and 19th centuries were marked by mass education of Standard German in schools. Slowly, Low Saxon was pushed back and back until it was nothing but a language spoken by the uneducated and at home. Today Low Saxon can be divided in two groups: Low Saxon varieties with a reasonable standard German. influx and varieties of Standard German with a Low Saxon influence known as Missingsch. Sometimes, Low Saxon and Low Franconian varieties are grouped together because both are unaffected by the High German consonant shift. However, the part of the population capable of speaking and responding to it, or of understanding it has decreased continuously since World War II. --Was soll~ on tun? Was bedeutet dos? {Bremen) Plottdeutsch ist ein Diolekt in Norddeutschland. (Tecklenburg} I~_, ~G!llll: • .• ;-• ',:•t ' • .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The German Neo-Standard in a Europa Context
Peter Auer The German neo-standard in a Europa context Abstract (Deutsch) In verschiedenen europäischen Ländern ist in letzter Zeit die Frage diskutiert worden, ob sich zwischen der traditionellen Standardsprache und den regionalen bzw. Substandardva- rietäten ein neuer Standard („Neo-Standard“) herausgebildet hat, der sich nicht nur struk- turell vom alten unterscheidet, sondern sich auch durch ein anderes Prestige auszeichnet als dieser: er wirkt (im Vergleich) informeller, subjektiver, moderner, kreativer, etc. Im Bei- trag werden einige wesentliche Eigenschaften solcher Neo-Standards diskutiert und ihre Ent- wicklung als Folge der „Demotisierung“ (Mattheier 1997) der Standardsprache beschrieben. Abstract (English) Sociolinguists from various European countries have recently discussed the question of whether a new standard (“neo-standard“) has established itself between the traditional stand- ard variety of language on the one hand, and regional (dialects, regiolects, regional standards) and sub-standard varieties on the other. These new standards differ not only structurally but also in terms of their prestige: they appear to be informal, subjective, modern, creative, etc. while the traditional standards are based on an opposite set of values such as tradition, formality and closeness to the written word. In this contribution I discuss some key proper- ties of these neo-standards and identify them as one of the consequences of the “demotici- sation” (Mattheier 1997) of the standard variety. 1. Introduction In various European languages, recent decades have seen the establishment of ‘informal‘ standards which are distinct from the traditional standards in terms of structure and attitudes: the new standards are considered to be ‘more relaxed’, ‘more personal’, ‘more subjective’, ‘more creative’, ‘more modern’, etc.
[Show full text]
For the Official Published Version, See Lingua 133 (Sept. 2013), Pp. 73–83. Link
For the official published version, see Lingua 133 (Sept. 2013), pp. 73–83. Link: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00243841 External Influences on English: From its Beginnings to the Renaissance, D. Gary Miller, Oxford University Press (2012), xxxi + 317 pp., Price: £65.00, ISBN 9780199654260 Lexical borrowing aside, external influences are not the main concern of most histories of the English language. It is therefore timely, and novel, to have a history of English (albeit only up to the Renaissance period) that looks at English purely from the perspective of external influences. Miller assembles his book around five strands of influence: (1) Celtic, (2) Latin and Greek, (3) Scandinavian, (4) French, (5) later Latin and Greek input, and he focuses on influences that left their mark on contemporary mainstream English rather than on regional or international varieties. This review looks at all chapters, but priority is given to Miller’s discussions of structural influence, especially on English syntax, morphology and phonology, which often raise a number of theoretical issues. Loanwords from various sources, which are also covered extensively in the book, will receive slightly less attention. Chapter 1 introduces the Indo-European and Germanic background of English and gives short descriptions of the languages with which English came into contact. This is a good way to start the book, but the copious lists of loanwords from Norwegian, Swedish, Danish, German, Low German, Afrikaans etc., most of which appear in English long after the Renaissance stop-off point, were not central to its aims. It would have been better to use this space to expand upon the theoretical framework employed throughout the book.
[Show full text]
INTELLIGIBILITY of STANDARD GERMAN and LOW GERMAN to SPEAKERS of DUTCH Charlotte Gooskens1, Sebastian Kürschner2, Renée Van Be
INTELLIGIBILITY OF STANDARD GERMAN AND LOW GERMAN TO SPEAKERS OF DUTCH Charlotte Gooskens 1, Sebastian Kürschner 2, Renée van Bezooijen 1 1University of Groningen, The Netherlands 2 University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract This paper reports on the intelligibility of spoken Low German and Standard German for speakers of Dutch. Two aspects are considered. First, the relative potential for intelligibility of the Low German variety of Bremen and the High German variety of Modern Standard German for speakers of Dutch is tested. Second, the question is raised whether Low German is understood more easily by subjects from the Dutch-German border area than subjects from other areas of the Netherlands. This is investigated empirically. The results show that in general Dutch people are better at understanding Standard German than the Low German variety, but that subjects from the border area are better at understanding Low German than subjects from other parts of the country. A larger amount of previous experience with the German standard variety than with Low German dialects could explain the first result, while proximity on the sound level could explain the second result. Key words Intelligibility, German, Low German, Dutch, Levenshtein distance, language contact 1. Introduction Dutch and German originate from the same branch of West Germanic. In the Middle Ages these neighbouring languages constituted a common dialect continuum. Only when linguistic standardisation came about in connection with nation building did the two languages evolve into separate social units. A High German variety spread out over the German language area and constitutes what is regarded as Modern Standard German today.
[Show full text]
Encounters with Otherness in Berlin: Xenophobia, Xenophilia, and Projective Identification
Encounters with Otherness in Berlin: Xenophobia, Xenophilia, and Projective Identification CONTRIBUTIONS BY ZARTOSHT AHLERS ‘18 ELENA ANAMOS ‘19 LEILA BEN HALIM. ‘20 WILLIAM GREAR ‘20 SYDNEY JORDAN ‘19 EMILY KUNKEL ‘19 NATE LAMBERT ‘20 ALEXIA MARTINEZ ‘20 APRIA PINKETT ‘20 IRMA QAVOLLI ‘20 ALAA RAGAB ‘20 RAINA SEYD ‘19 YANG SHAO ‘20 SAM VALLE ‘19 SADIE VAN VRANKEN ’19 : EDITED AND WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY JOHN BORNEMAN © 2017 Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies With special thanks to the Department of Anthropology, Princeton University. COVER PHOTO: “There was a big hot air balloon that we passed that said “politics needs a worldview” in German. I liked this message. It was a comforting first impression.” - Emily Kunkel TABLE OF CONTENTS PROFESSOR JOHN BORNEMAN APRIA PINKETT ’20 Introduction . 3 German Culture: The Most Exclusive Club . 44 ZARTOSHT AHLERS ’18 German Culture in Three Words: Beer, Currywurst, and Money . 62 Leopoldplatz . 7 Bergmann Burger: There’s No Place Encounter With a Turkish Like Home . 79 Immigrant at Leopoldplatz . 12 Ich Spreche Englisch . 85 Movement . 25 So Loud . 88 IRMA QAVOLLI ’20 ELENA ANAMOS ’19 An Unexpected Conversation . 17 Cultural Belonging: Belonging: Body Language Childbearing and Channel Surfing: in a Conversation on Foreignness . 23 A Reunion with My Family . 40 A Market Conversation . 48 An Encounter Over Ice Cream Food . 69 in Leopoldplatz . 71 The Language Barrier in Hermannplatz . 83 ALAA RAGAB ’20 JOHN BENJAMIN, LANGUAGE INSTRUCTOR Let’s Test You for Explosives Residue! . .19 Arab is Better, Arab is More Fun . 28 Language: Change in Global Seminars . 82 Germans Nice or Nein? .
[Show full text]
Sprache Der Heimat.’ Discourses of Dialect and Identity in Modern-Day Cologne
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by UCL Discovery ‘Sprache der Heimat.’ Discourses of dialect and identity in modern-day Cologne Geraldine Horan 1. Introduction Associating language with Heimat is not a new phenomenon. Heidegger’s lecture ‘Sprache und Heimat’ [Language and Home]1 (1960), for example, articulated the fundamental yet intangeable relationship between dialect as the mothertongue and a sense of ‘home’ (Heidegger 1983: 155–180), and philosophers and linguists alike have attempted to analyse how language can create and represent a sense of belonging in a ‘fusion of language and landscape’ (Hammermeister 2000: 314). This connection is particularly strong with dialect, which in modern times is largely reserved for the familiar, private sphere, or is employed symbolically as a marker of local identity. This chapter analyses discourses about Kölsch, the urban dialect spoken in the German city of Cologne, and about engagement with the dialect by members of a specific community; namely, participants in dialect and dialect-related courses as the Akademie för uns kölsche Sproch [Academy for our Cologne Language].2 Using data from questionnaires completed by participants in these courses, I explore individuals’ attitudes to the dialect, perceived level of proficiency, and the role the dialect plays in the construction of local identity. I shall argue that the externalisation of this personal, emotional link between dialect and identity that takes place through participation in dialect or dialect-related courses is part of an identity building process – it is about filling perceived ‘gaps’ in the individual’s identity, and/or extending and enhancing identity, in forging and maintaining membership of a community that is defined by its language and geographical location.
[Show full text]
Vowel Change in English and German: a Comparative Analysis
Vowel change in English and German: a comparative analysis Miriam Calvo Fernández Degree in English Studies Academic Year: 2017/2018 Supervisor: Reinhard Bruno Stempel Department of English and German Philology and Translation Abstract English and German descend from the same parent language: West-Germanic, from which other languages, such as Dutch, Afrikaans, Flemish, or Frisian come as well. These would, therefore, be called “sister” languages, since they share a number of features in syntax, morphology or phonology, among others. The history of English and German as sister languages dates back to the Late antiquity, when they were dialects of a Proto-West-Germanic language. After their split, more than 1,400 years ago, they developed their own language systems, which were almost identical at their earlier stages. However, this is not the case anymore, as can be seen in their current vowel systems: the German vowel system is composed of 23 monophthongs and 8 diphthongs, while that of English has only 12 monophthongs and 8 diphthongs. The present paper analyses how the English and German vowels have gradually changed over time in an attempt to understand the differences and similarities found in their current vowel systems. In order to do so, I explain in detail the previous stages through which both English and German went, giving special attention to the vowel changes from a phonological perspective. Not only do I describe such processes, but I also contrast the paths both languages took, which is key to understand all the differences and similarities present in modern English and German. The analysis shows that one of the main reasons for the differences between modern German and English is to be found in all the languages English has come into contact with in the course of its history, which have exerted a significant influence on its vowel system, making it simpler than that of German.
[Show full text]
Hanseatic League, 1370
Hanseatic League, 1370 “The lust for buying and selling was strong in their blood, and, under the most fearful conditions of hardship and danger, they went their weary way over the ill-conditioned roads to convey their merchandise from place to place, braving the dangers of pillage and death at the hands of the various Barons and powerful dignitaries of the Church—for their holy calling did not make the latter any less eager for temporal riches.” —Elizabeth Gee Nash, The Hansa: Its History and Romance Dear Delegates, It is with great excitement and pleasure that I welcome everyone to the Hanseatic League! My name is Bob Zhao. I am a sophomore studying Economics and Computer Science, and I will be directing the Hanseatic League committee over the course of the weekend. I’m originally from Memphis, Tennessee, and have been involved with Model UN since my freshman year of high school. After attending WUMUNS my freshman year, I was absolutely hooked, and it became the conference I most looked forward to every year afterward. I am so excited to relive one of my favorite parts of high school with you all and to explore this fascinating period of history throughout the three days of WUMUNS XI. The Hanseatic League is one of the earliest and most important, yet least known, economic unions in European history, the influence of which can be seen in the trade confederations of Renaissance Italy, the rise of the German states in the late 1800s, and even the modern European Union. Many of the economic idiosyncrasies of the modern European system can be traced back to the formative years of the Hanseatic League, which, in addition to being an important economic collective in continental Europe, was an extremely influential political force in the pre-Reformation golden years of the Holy Roman Empire.
[Show full text]
Archbp. = Archbishop/Archbishopric; B
Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-88909-4 - German Histories in the Age of Reformations, 1400-1650 Thomas A. Brady Index More information Index Abbreviations: archbp. = archbishop/archbishopric; b. = born; bp. = bishop/bishopric; d. = died; r. = reigned/ruled Aachen, 89, 207, 252, 303, 312 Albert V ‘‘the Magnanimous’’ (b. 1528,r. absolutism, 7. See also European imperial 1550–79), duke of Bavaria, 294 nation-state Albert ‘‘the Stout-hearted’’ (1443–1500), duke academies: Bremen, 253; Herborn, 253, 279 of Saxony, 244 Acceptance of Mainz, 92n13 Albertine Saxony. See Saxony, Albertine acculturation, 289n101 Alcala´de Henares (Castile), 210 accumulation, beneﬁces, 57n25 Alexander VI (r. 1492–1503), pope, 144 Adalbero (d. 1030), bp. of Laon, 29–30, 34, 49 Alexander VII (r. 1655–67), pope, 401n83, 410 Admont, abbey (Styria), 81 Alfonso I (b. 1396,r.1442–58), king of Naples, Adrian VI (r. 1522–23), pope, 145n63, 208 93 AEIOU, 91 Allga¨u, 193 Agnes (1551–1637), countess of Mansfeld- alliances, confessional: Catholics 1525, 215; Eisleben, 365 League of Gotha 1526, 215; Protestants 1529, Agricola, Gregor, pastor of Hatzendorf 216; Swiss cities with Strasbourg and Hesse (Styria), 344 1530, 217. See also Smalkaldic League Agricola, Johannes (1494–1566), 39 Alsace, 18, 23, 190; religious wars, 239; Swabian agriculture, 31 War, 119 Agrippa of Nettesheim, Cornelius (1486–1535), Alt, Salome (1568–1633), domestic partner of 54n10 Archbp. Wolf Dietrich von Raitenau, 306 Ahausen (Franconia), 368 Alte Veste, battle 1632, 382 Alba, duke of, Francisco Alvarez de Toledo Altenstetter, David (1547–1617), goldsmith of (1507–82), 238n41, 250n80 Augsburg, 332 Alber, Erasmus (1500–53), 264, 281 Alto¨ tting, shrine (Bavaria), 286 Albert (b.
[Show full text]
Adverbial Reinforcement of Demonstratives in Dialectal German
Glossa a journal of general linguistics Adverbial reinforcement of COLLECTION: NEW PERSPECTIVES demonstratives in dialectal ON THE NP/DP DEBATE German RESEARCH PHILIPP RAUTH AUGUSTIN SPEYER *Author affiliations can be found in the back matter of this article ABSTRACT CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Philipp Rauth In the German dialects of Rhine and Moselle Franconian, demonstratives are Universität des Saarlandes, reinforced by locative adverbs do/lo ‘here/there’ in order to emphasize their deictic Germany strength. Interestingly, these adverbs can also appear in the intermediate position, i.e., [email protected] between the demonstrative and the noun (e.g. das do Bier ‘that there beer’), which is not possible in most other varieties of European German. Our questionnaire study and several written and oral sources suggest that reinforcement has become mandatory in KEYWORDS: demonstrative contexts. We analyze this grammaticalization process as reanalysis of demonstrative; reinforcer; do/lo from a lexical head to the head of a functional Index Phrase. We also show that a German; Rhine Franconian; functional DP-shell can better cope with this kind of syntactic change and with certain Moselle Franconian; Germanic; serialization facts concerning adjoined adjectives. Romance; dialectal German; grammaticalization; reanalysis; NP; DP; questionnaire TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Rauth, Philipp and Augustin Speyer. 2021. Adverbial reinforcement of demonstratives in dialectal German. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6(1): 4. 1–24. DOI: https://doi. org/10.5334/gjgl.1166 1 INTRODUCTION Rauth and Speyer 2 Glossa: a journal of In colloquial Standard German, the only difference between definite determiners (1a) and general linguistics DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.1166 demonstratives is emphatic stress in demonstrative contexts (1b).
[Show full text]
Joachim Kokkelmans: Elvis Presley, God and Jane
Elvis Presley, God and Jane: the Germanic proprial article in a comparative perspective Joachim Kokkelmans Ghent University / Università degli Studi di Verona Abstract In several Germanic languages and dialects (e.g. German, Luxemburgish, Norwegian), definite articles and personal pronouns are not only used with common nouns and independently, respectively (e.g. the woman, she), but also with personal proper names (literally the Jane, she Jane). In some of the languages which use this marker named proprial article, its use is restricted to specific types of persons (e.g. family members), whilst in others, the article can be found in various and even surprising contexts (e.g. the God, he (Elvis) Presley). Although at first glance the use of the proprial article seems to be relatively unpredictable as to what is considered grammatical and what is not, varying inside and between dialects, this paper posits the existence of an underlying universal hierarchical structure which determines the possible restrictions of the use of the proprial article. 1. Introduction1 In modern Germanic languages, definite articles and personal pronouns are used to indicate referentiality and “known-ness”2 in the discourse (i.e. differentiating rheme from theme): for example, the woman and she both refer to a supposedly known, unique and/or previously mentioned woman. Definite articles contrast with indefinite articles (a woman), which indicate unknown, unspecific or new entities in the discourse. Despite the different views in the literature on the roles of knownness and uniqueness when defining definiteness (see e.g. Jenks 2015: 203f.; Schwarz 2009: 1-4), there is a wide consensus on the fact that definite articles and personal pronouns serve to indicate that the entity referred to has been mentioned earlier in the discourse and is thus already known, or that it is (supposed to be) already known elsewise to the interlocutors (Schmuck & Szczepaniak 2014: 97f.; Schwarz 2009: 3; Werth 2014: 152).
[Show full text]
Metalinguistic Discourses on Low German in the Nineteenth Century*
How to Deal with Non-Dominant Languages – Metalinguistic Discourses on Low German in the Nineteenth Century* Nils Langer (Flensburg/Bristol) and Robert Langhanke (Flensburg/Kiel) Abstract This paper discusses nineteenth-century metalinguistic discussions of Low German, an authochthonous of Northern Germany, which, having lost its status as a written language suitable for formal discourse during the Early Modern period, has since been reduced to the spoken domain. During the nineteenth century the language was on the verge of enjoying a revival, with original poetry being published and extensive discussions as to whether Low German ought to play a role in formal education. As this article shows, this discussion was intense and controversial. Comparing the views of Klaus Groth, the leading proponent of Low German in the second half of the nineteenth century, with the internal debates amongst school teachers - hitherto never discussed by the scholarly literature – this article demonstrates the intellectual and ideological split felt by these educational practioners in their views of Low German: on the one hand, they recognise the cultural value of Low German as the historical language of the North and the native language of the pupils they teach, on the other hand they agree with each other that the language of education and science, as well as national unity, can only be High German. We hope to show with our discussion not only how very similar modern thinking on the use of Low German is to these historical discussions but also how the status and perception of many regional and minority languages across the world has been subject to the same or very similar thoughts and pressures.
[Show full text]
Inheritance and Inflectional Morphology: Old High German, Latin, Early New High German, and Koine Greek
Inheritance and Inflectional Morphology: Old High German, Latin, Early New High German, and Koine Greek By MaryEllen Anne LeBlanc A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in German in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Irmengard Rauch, Chair Professor Thomas Shannon Professor Gary Holland Spring 2014 1 Abstract Inheritance and Inflectional Morphology: Old High German, Latin, Early New High German, and Koine Greek by MaryEllen Anne LeBlanc Doctor of Philosophy in German University of California, Berkeley Professor Irmengard Rauch, Chair The inheritance framework originates in the field of artificial intelligence. It was incorporated first into theories of computational linguistics, and in the last two decades, it has been applied to theoretical linguistics. Inheritance refers to the sharing of properties: when a group of items have a common property, each item is said to inherit this property. The properties may be mapped in tree format with nodes arranged vertically. The most general (i.e. the most widely shared, unmarked) properties are found at the highest nodes, and the most specific (marked) information is found at the lowest nodes. Inheritance is particularly useful when applied to inflectional morphology due to its focus on the generalizations within and across paradigms. As such, it serves as an alternative to traditional paradigms, which may simplify the translation process; and provides a visual representation of the structure of the language's morphology. Such a mapping also enables cross- linguistic morphological comparison. In this dissertation, I apply the inheritance framework to the nominal inflectional morphology of Old High German, Latin, Early New High German, and Koine Greek.
[Show full text]