DOCSLIB.ORG

The Creation of an Independent Commissioner Responsible for Leaders' Debates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Creation of an Independent Commissioner Responsible for Leaders' Debates THE CREATION OF AN INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONER RESPONSIBLE FOR LEADERS’ DEBATES Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs The Honourable Larry Bagnell, Chair MARCH 2018 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION The proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees are hereby made available to provide greater public access. The parliamentary privilege of the House of Commons to control the publication and broadcast of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees is nonetheless reserved. All copyrights therein are also reserved. Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise. The House of Commons retains the right and privilege to find users in contempt of Parliament if a reproduction or use is not in accordance with this permission. Also available on the House of Commons website at the following address: www.ourcommons.ca The Creation of an Independent Commissioner Responsible for Leaders’ Debates Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs Hon. Larry Bagnell Chair MARCH 2018 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION NOTICE TO READER Reports from committee presented to the House of Commons Presenting a report to the House is the way a committee makes public its findings and recommendations on a particular topic. Substantive reports on a subject-matter study usually contain a synopsis of the testimony heard, the recommendations made by the committee, as well as the reasons for those recommendations. STANDING COMMITTEE ON PROCEDURE AND HOUSE AFFAIRS CHAIR Hon. Larry Bagnell VICE-CHAIRS David Christopherson Blake Richards MEMBERS Chris Bittle Scott Reid David de Burgh Graham Ruby Sahota Andy Fillmore* Scott Simms Kevin Lamoureux* Filomena Tassi John Nater OTHER MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO PARTICIPATED Frank Baylis Paul Lefebvre Kelly Block Elizabeth May Pierre-Luc Dusseault Marco Mendicino Randall Garrison Christine Moore Gudie Hutchings Jamie Schmale Kamal Khera Hon. Peter Van Loan Tom Kmiec Kevin Waugh * Non-voting member, pursuant to Standing Order 104(5). iii CLERK OF THE COMMITTEE Andrew Lauzon LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT Parliamentary Information and Research Service Andre Barnes, Analyst Michaela Keenan-Pelletier, Analyst iv THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PROCEDURE AND HOUSE AFFAIRS has the honour to present its FIFTY-FIFTH REPORT Pursuant to its mandate under Standing Order 108(3)(a)(vi), the Committee has studied the Creation of an Independent Commissioner Responsible for Leaders’ Debates and has agreed to report the following: v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................. 1 THE CREATION OF AN INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONER RESPONSIBLE FOR LEADERS’ DEBATES .............................................................................................................................. 5 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................... 5 i. Historical overview of televised federal party leaders’ debates .............. 5 ii. Organization and legal framework of debates ............................................. 12 iii. Role of federal party leaders’ debates in Canada ........................................ 14 iv. Recent federal party leaders' debates ............................................................. 15 v. Exploring changes to how federal leaders’ debates are organized in Canada .................................................................................................................... 17 DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................................... 19 A. Mandate of an entity responsible for organizing federal party leaders’ debates ............................................................................................................................... 19 B. Establishing an entity responsible for organizing federal party leaders’ debates ............................................................................................................................... 21 i. Federal party leaders’ debates facilitator or commissioner .................. 23 ii. Broadcasting Arbitrator ....................................................................................... 24 iii. Other considerations ............................................................................................. 26 C. Powers of an entity responsible for organizing federal party leaders’ debates ............................................................................................................................... 27 i. Establishing criteria for participation by political parties in a federal party leaders’ debate ............................................................................................. 27 ii. Ensuring accessible federal party leaders’ debates for Canadians with disabilities ........................................................................................................ 29 iii. Ensuring a minimum number of debates ...................................................... 31 iv. Decisions related to broadcasting the federal party leaders’ debates ........................................................................................................................ 32 (a) The role of an organizing entity for leaders’ debates in making broadcasting-related decisions ................................................................. 33 vii (b) Timing of leaders’ debates .......................................................................... 35 (c) Cost of the leaders’ debates ........................................................................ 36 (d) Journalistic standards ................................................................................... 37 v. Enforcement of Participation ............................................................................. 37 vi. Miscellaneous matters .......................................................................................... 39 (a) Review of entity .............................................................................................. 39 (b) Timeline for establishing an independent debate organizing entity ................................................................................................................... 39 Appendix A: List of witnesses ................................................................................................................. 41 Appendix B: List of briefs ......................................................................................................................... 45 Request for Government Response ..................................................................................................... 47 Dissenting Opinion of the Conservative Party of Canada ........................................................... 49 viii LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS As a result of their deliberations committees may make recommendations which they include in their reports for the consideration of the House of Commons or the Government. Recommendations related to this study are listed below. Recommendation 1 That the government should proceed with establishing a new entity to organize leaders’ debates during federal elections and that entity should be established in time to organize debates during the 2019 federal general election; That this new entity must be created in such a way to ensure its independence and neutrality; That the new entity be mandated to educate Canadians about how debates are organized, when debates are occurring, and how Canadians can experience the debates. ................................................................................................................... 21 Recommendation 2 That a new autonomous office be created by the government called Canada’s Federal Party Leaders’ Debates Commissioner (for short: “Debates Commissioner”). The office should be placed within Elections Canada/the Office of the Chief Electoral Officer for the purposes of sharing appropriate internal services and receiving administrative support
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Core 1..39 Journalweekly (PRISM::Advent3b2 10.50)
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 40th PARLIAMENT, 3rd SESSION 40e LÉGISLATURE, 3e SESSION Journals Journaux No. 2 No 2 Thursday, March 4, 2010 Le jeudi 4 mars 2010 10:00 a.m. 10 heures PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES TABLING OF DOCUMENTS DÉPÔT DE DOCUMENTS Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Conformément à l'article 32(2) du Règlement, M. Lukiwski Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Chambre Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, des communes) dépose sur le Bureau, — Réponses du pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: gouvernement, conformément à l’article 36(8) du Règlement, aux pétitions suivantes : — Nos. 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, — nos 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, 402- 402-1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 402- 402-1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 and 402-1513 1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 et 402-1513 au sujet du concerning the Employment Insurance Program. — Sessional régime d'assurance-emploi. — Document parlementaire no 8545- Paper No. 8545-403-1-01; 403-1-01; — Nos. 402-1129, 402-1174 and 402-1268 concerning national — nos 402-1129, 402-1174 et 402-1268 au sujet des parcs parks. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-2-01; nationaux. — Document parlementaire no 8545-403-2-01; — Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsocialist-Issue54
    VIRTUAL SEXUALITY BOLIVIAN ELECTIONS 54 NOV-JAN 2005/2006 ISSUE NO. 54 SPECIAL ISSUE ON CANADA & EMPIRE $4.95 HURRICANE KATRINA 7272006 86358 www.newsociallist.org EDITORIAL Canada and Empire Since the US government reacted to the attacks of No serious analysis of Canadian history or contemporary September 11th, 2001 by accelerating its push for global state polices towards Aboriginal communities can deny the dominance, there has been more talk about empire and impe- colonial nature of Canada or lend credence to a political strat- rialism than at any time since the 1970s. egy based on asserting the sovereignty of the same state that With Canadian troops and police in Afghanistan and denies Aboriginal Peoples and Quebec the right to self-deter- Haiti, the big boost in spending on the military in the last mination up to and including independence if they so federal budget and active government support for the “struc- choose. tural adjustment” policies of the International Monetary In our view, the notion that Canada is some kind of Fund and the World Bank that have inflicted so much harm dependent nation can’t be squared with the reality of the on people in the “Third World,” serious questions about Canadian state’s current role in Haiti or its pursuit of policies Canada’s relationship to imperialism are harder and harder to that destroy the livelihoods of millions of people in the ignore. Global South while giving free reign to multinational corpo- But because most anti-imperialist protest and analysis in rations – including Canadian companies - to plunder their Canada focuses on the US, such important questions often resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Canadian Engagement in Eastern Europe and Central Asia
    STRENGTHENING CANADIAN ENGAGEMENT IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA UZBEKISTAN 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Hon. Robert D. Nault Chair NOVEMBER 2017 Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION The proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees are hereby made available to provide greater public access. The parliamentary privilege of the House of Commons to control the publication and broadcast of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees is nonetheless reserved. All copyrights therein are also reserved. Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees.
    [Show full text]
  • The Requisites of Leadership in the Modern House of Commons 1
    Number 4 November 2001 CANADIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP HE EQUISITES OF EADERSHIP THE REQUISITES OF LEADERSHIP IN THE MODERN HOUSE OF COMMONS Paper by: Cristine de Clercy Department of Political Studies University of Saskatchewan Canadian Members of the Study of Parliament Executive Committee Group 2000-2001 The Canadian Study of President Parliament Group (CSPG) was created Leo Doyle with the object of bringing together all those with an interest in parliamentary Vice-President institutions and the legislative F. Leslie Seidle process, to promote understanding and to contribute to their reform and Past President improvement. Judy Cedar-Wilson The constitution of the Canadian Treasurer Study of Parliament Group makes Antonine Campbell provision for various activities, including the organization of conferences and Secretary seminars in Ottawa and elsewhere in James R. Robertson Canada, the preparation of articles and various publications, the Counsellors establishment of workshops, the Dianne Brydon promotion and organization of public William Cross discussions on parliamentary affairs, David Docherty participation in public affairs programs Jeff Heynen on radio and television, and the Tranquillo Marrocco sponsorship of other educational Louis Massicotte activities. Charles Robert Jennifer Smith Membership is open to all those interested in Canadian legislative institutions. Applications for membership and additional information concerning the Group should be addressed to the Secretariat, Canadian Study of Parliament Group, Box 660, West Block, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0A6. Tel: (613) 943-1228, Fax: (613) 995- 5357. INTRODUCTION This is the fourth paper in the Canadian Study of Parliament Groups Parliamentary Perspectives. First launched in 1998, the perspective series is intended as a vehicle for distributing both studies prepared by academics and the reflections of others who have a particular interest in these themes.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Canada Et La Défense De L'amérique Du Nord : Norad
    LE CANADA ET LA DÉFENSE DE L’AMÉRIQUE DU NORD : NORAD ET LA DISPONIBILITÉ OPÉRATIONNELLE DES FORCES AÉRIENNES Rapport du Comité permanent de la défense nationale Le président Stephen Fuhr SEPTEMBRE 2016 42e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Publié en conformité de l’autorité du Président de la Chambre des communes PERMISSION DU PRÉSIDENT Il est permis de reproduire les délibérations de la Chambre et de ses comités, en tout ou en partie, sur n’importe quel support, pourvu que la reproduction soit exacte et qu’elle ne soit pas présentée comme version officielle. Il n’est toutefois pas permis de reproduire, de distribuer ou d’utiliser les délibérations à des fins commerciales visant la réalisation d'un profit financier. Toute reproduction ou utilisation non permise ou non formellement autorisée peut être considérée comme une violation du droit d’auteur aux termes de la Loi sur le droit d’auteur. Une autorisation formelle peut être obtenue sur présentation d’une demande écrite au Bureau du Président de la Chambre. La reproduction conforme à la présente permission ne constitue pas une publication sous l’autorité de la Chambre. Le privilège absolu qui s’applique aux délibérations de la Chambre ne s’étend pas aux reproductions permises. Lorsqu’une reproduction comprend des mémoires présentés à un comité de la Chambre, il peut être nécessaire d’obtenir de leurs auteurs l’autorisation de les reproduire, conformément à la Loi sur le droit d’auteur. La présente permission ne porte pas atteinte aux privilèges, pouvoirs, immunités et droits de la Chambre et de ses comités. Il est entendu que cette permission ne touche pas l’interdiction de contester ou de mettre en cause les délibérations de la Chambre devant les tribunaux ou autrement.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of the Special Committee on the COVID
    43rd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Special Committee on the COVID-19 Pandemic EVIDENCE NUMBER 019 Tuesday, June 9, 2020 Chair: The Honourable Anthony Rota 1 Special Committee on the COVID-19 Pandemic Tuesday, June 9, 2020 ● (1200) Mr. Paul Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith, GP): Thank you, [Translation] Madam Chair. The Acting Chair (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès (Brossard— It's an honour to present a petition for the residents and con‐ Saint-Lambert, Lib.)): I now call this meeting to order. stituents of Nanaimo—Ladysmith. Welcome to the 19th meeting of the Special Committee on the Yesterday was World Oceans Day. This petition calls upon the COVID-19 Pandemic. House of Commons to establish a permanent ban on crude oil [English] tankers on the west coast of Canada to protect B.C.'s fisheries, tourism, coastal communities and the natural ecosystems forever. I remind all members that in order to avoid issues with sound, members participating in person should not also be connected to the Thank you. video conference. For those of you who are joining via video con‐ ference, I would like to remind you that when speaking you should The Acting Chair (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès): Thank you very be on the same channel as the language you are speaking. much. [Translation] We now go to Mrs. Jansen. As usual, please address your remarks to the chair, and I will re‐ Mrs. Tamara Jansen (Cloverdale—Langley City, CPC): mind everyone that today's proceedings are televised. Thank you, Madam Chair. We will now proceed to ministerial announcements. I'm pleased to rise today to table a petition concerning con‐ [English] science rights for palliative care providers, organizations and all health care professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Discerning Claim Making: Political Representation of Indo-Canadians by Canadian Political Parties
    Discerning Claim Making: Political Representation of Indo-Canadians by Canadian Political Parties by Anju Gill B.A., University of the Fraser Valley, 2012 Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Political Science Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences © Anju Gill 2017 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2017 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Approval Name: Anju Gill Degree: Master of Arts Title: Discerning Claim Making: Political Representation of Indo-Canadians by Canadian Political Parties Examining Committee: Chair: Tsuyoshi Kawasaki Associate Professor Eline de Rooij Senior Supervisor Assistant Professor Mark Pickup Supervisor Associate Professor Genevieve Fuji Johnson Internal/External Examiner Professor Date Defended/Approved: September 21, 2017 ii Abstract The targeting of people of colour by political parties during election campaigns is often described in the media as “wooing” or “courting.” How parties engage or “woo” non- whites is not fully understood. Theories on representation provide a framework for the systematic analysis of the types of representation claims made by political actors. I expand on the political proximity approach—which suggests that public office seekers make more substantive than symbolic claims to their partisans than to non-aligned voters—by arguing that Canadian political parties view mainstream voters as their typical constituents and visible minorities, such as Indo-Canadians, as peripheral constituents. Consequently, campaign messages targeted at mainstream voters include more substantive claims than messages targeted at non-white voters.
    [Show full text]
  • The NDP's Approach to Constitutional Issues Has Not Been Electorally
    Constitutional Confusion on the Left: The NDP’s Position in Canada’s Constitutional Debates Murray Cooke [email protected] First Draft: Please do not cite without permission. Comments welcome. Paper prepared for the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Political Science Association, June 2004, Winnipeg The federal New Democratic Party experienced a dramatic electoral decline in the 1990s from which it has not yet recovered. Along with difficulties managing provincial economies, the NDP was wounded by Canada’s constitutional debates. The NDP has historically struggled to present a distinctive social democratic approach to Canada’s constitution. Like its forerunner, the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), the NDP has supported a liberal, (English-Canadian) nation-building approach that fits comfortably within the mainstream of Canadian political thought. At the same time, the party has prioritized economic and social polices rather than seriously addressing issues such as the deepening of democracy or the recognition of national or regional identities. Travelling without a roadmap, the constitutional debates of the 80s and 90s proved to be a veritable minefield for the NDP. Through three rounds of mega- constitutional debate (1980-82, 1987-1990, 1991-1992), the federal party leadership supported the constitutional priorities of the federal government of the day, only to be torn by disagreements from within. This paper will argue that the NDP’s division, lack of direction and confusion over constitution issues can be traced back to longstanding weaknesses in the party’s social democratic theory and strategy. First of all, the CCF- NDP embraced rather than challenged the parameters and institutions of liberal democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Modernizing Canada's Electoral System: Instant Runoff Voting As The
    Modernizing Canada’s Electoral System: Instant Runoff Voting as the Best Alternative By Maxime Dubé, as an individual Summary In the context of electoral reform brought about by the current government, many electoral systems come into contention for replacing the current first-past-the-post (FPTP) system. In this brief, it is argued that the instant-runoff voting (IRV) system is the best alternative for the current FPTP system in Canada. It solves most of Canadians’ issues with the current system, while presenting itself as the least challenging option for all bodies implicated in a federal election. Additionally, the IRV system does not produce coalition governments like other systems, thus allowing the state to remain strong and effective. The adoption of mandatory voting should only be considered after researching methods that will incentivize citizens to vote. Finally, online voting should not to be considered, due to potential security concerns. Introduction The present FPTP system is an electoral system that has been, and still is widely used throughout the world. It “is one of the oldest and simplest electoral systems”1 For instance, this voting system is presently used in all legislative elections in Canada, for national parliamentary elections in the United Kingdom and the United States of America, as well as for India and most Caribbean islands2. With the election of the current majoritarian Liberal government in the 2015 general election, one of the electoral promises made by the party and its leader, Justin Trudeau, was that the general election of 2015 would be the last federal election to be held with the FPTP system3.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Priority Ridings Which Will Determine the Outcome of This Election
    50 Priority Ridings Which Will Determine The Outcome of This Election CAW PREFERRED LAST ELECTION RESULTS: PROV RIDING CANDIDATE PARTY CON LIB NDP GRN % % % % BC Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca Lillian Szpak LIB 34 34 23 8 BC Kamloops – Thompson – Cariboo Michael Crawford NDP 46 10 36 8 BC Nanaimo-Alberni Zeni Maartman NDP 47 9 32 12 BC North Vancouver Taleeb Noormohamed LIB 42 37 9 11 BC Saanich – Gulf Islands Elizabeth May GRN 43 39 6 10 BC Surrey North Jasbir Sandhu NDP 39 15 36 6 BC Vancouver Island North Ronna-Rae Leonard NDP 46 4 41 8 BC Vancouver South Ujjal Dosanjh LIB 38 38 18 5 BC Vancouver Quadra Joyce Murray LIB 37 46 8 9 SK Palliser Noah Evanchuck NDP 44 17 34 5 SK Saskatoon – Rosetown – Biggar Nettie Wiebe NDP 45 4 44 5 MB Winnipeg North Rebecca Blaikie NDP 10 46 41 1 MB Winnipeg South Centre Anita Neville LIB 36 42 14 7 ON Ajax – Pickering Mark Holland LIB 38 45 9 7 ON Bramalea – Gore – Malton Gurbax Malhi LIB 37 45 12 5 ON Brampton – Springdale Ruby Dhalla LIB 39 41 12 8 ON Brampton West Andrew Kania LIB 40 40 14 6 ON Brant Lloyd St. Amand LIB 42 33 17 7 ON Davenport Andrew Cash NDP 11 46 31 10 ON Don Valley West Rob Oliphant LIB 39 44 10 6 ON Eglinton – Lawrence Joe Volpe LIB 39 44 8 8 ON Essex Taras Natyshak NDP 40 29 27 4 ON Guelph Frank Valeriote LIB 29 32 16 21 ON Haldimand-Norfolk Bob Speller LIB 41 32 12 4 ON Kenora Roger Valley LIB 40 32 23 5 ON Kingston and Islands Ted Hsu LIB 33 39 17 11 ON Kitchener – Waterloo Andrew Telegdi LIB 36 36 15 12 ON Kitchener Centre Karen Redman LIB 37 36 18 9 ON London North Centre Glen
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..15 Journalweekly (PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25)
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 41st PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION 41e LÉGISLATURE, 2e SESSION Journals Journaux No. 104 No 104 Monday, June 16, 2014 Le lundi 16 juin 2014 11:00 a.m. 11 heures The Clerk informed the House of the unavoidable absence of La Greffière informe la Chambre de l'absence inévitable du the Speaker. Président. Whereupon, Mr. Devolin (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes— Sur ce, M. Devolin (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), Brock), Deputy Chair of Committees of the Whole, took the vice-président des comités pléniers, assume la présidence, Chair, pursuant to Standing Order 8. conformément à l'article 8 du Règlement. PRAYERS PRIÈRE PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS AFFAIRES ÉMANANT DES DÉPUTÉS At 11:03 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(7), the House À 11 h 3, conformément à l'article 30(7) du Règlement, la proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business. Chambre aborde l'étude des Affaires émanant des députés. Mr. Stanton (Simcoe North), seconded by Mr. Preston (Elgin— M. Stanton (Simcoe-Nord), appuyé par M. Preston (Elgin— Middlesex—London), moved, — That, in the opinion of the Middlesex—London), propose, — Que, de l’avis de la Chambre, le House, the government should consider the advisability of gouvernement devrait examiner l’opportunité de prendre des measures to deepen and straighten the vessel navigation channel mesures pour approfondir et redresser la voie navigable qui relie which provides access between Georgian Bay and the westerly la baie Georgienne et la limite ouest de la Voie navigable Trent limit of the Trent-Severn Waterway, at Port Severn.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..16 Journalweekly (PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25)
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION 42e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Journals Journaux No. 22 No 22 Monday, February 22, 2016 Le lundi 22 février 2016 11:00 a.m. 11 heures PRAYER PRIÈRE GOVERNMENT ORDERS ORDRES ÉMANANT DU GOUVERNEMENT The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Trudeau La Chambre reprend l'étude de la motion de M. Trudeau (Prime Minister), seconded by Mr. LeBlanc (Leader of the (premier ministre), appuyé par M. LeBlanc (leader du Government in the House of Commons), — That the House gouvernement à la Chambre des communes), — Que la Chambre support the government’s decision to broaden, improve, and appuie la décision du gouvernement d’élargir, d’améliorer et de redefine our contribution to the effort to combat ISIL by better redéfinir notre contribution à l’effort pour lutter contre l’EIIL en leveraging Canadian expertise while complementing the work of exploitant mieux l’expertise canadienne, tout en travaillant en our coalition partners to ensure maximum effect, including: complémentarité avec nos partenaires de la coalition afin d’obtenir un effet optimal, y compris : (a) refocusing our military contribution by expanding the a) en recentrant notre contribution militaire, et ce, en advise and assist mission of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) in développant la mission de conseil et d’assistance des Forces Iraq, significantly increasing intelligence capabilities in Iraq and armées canadiennes (FAC) en Irak, en augmentant theatre-wide, deploying CAF medical personnel,
    [Show full text]