Richard Hoggart and Pilkington

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Richard Hoggart and Pilkington Julian Petley ed Kingdom by the BBC and the ITA’ and ‘to recommend whether additional services should be provided by any other organisation’ (HMSO 1962: 1). It was chaired by the industrialist Sir Harry Pilkington, but the key member of the committee was undoubtedly Richard Hoggart, who had recently written an influential article for Encounter entitled ‘The uses of television’ (Hoggart 1970: 152-162). The report was commissioned for four reasons. Firstly, ITV had been introduced in 1954 for only a ten year ‘experimental’ period, mainly Richard Hoggart and because of Labour Party hostility to commer- cial television, and this would soon be drawing Pilkington: Populism to a close. Second, the channel was attracting and public service mounting criticism from those who believed that the ITV companies were making unaccept- broadcasting ably large profits from poor quality program- ming. Third, there was the looming question of In 1962 the Pilkington Committee, of which whether there should be a third television chan- Richard Hoggart was a highly influential mem- nel, and if so, to whom it should be allotted. ber, produced a report which was highly criti- And fourth, the BBC Charter was due to expire cal of ITV and its regulator the Independent in 1962. However, the resultant report, which Television Authority. It recommended that was produced in June 1962, went far beyond the third television channel be allocated to addressing these specific issues and although, the BBC, and that the authority, once armed as we shall see, its main recommendations for with greater seriousness of purpose, should restructuring ITV were rejected, in 1977 the both plan the ITV schedules and sell advertis- Annan Committee were able to claim convinc- ing time, thus greatly reducing the power of ingly that ‘the Pilkington Report transformed the advertisers over the programme mak- the face of ITV’ (p. 146), whilst Jeffrey Milland ers and schedulers within the companies. The has argued that ‘broadcasting in Britain con- government baulked at the proposals for ITV tinued to be based on Pilkingtonian principles but, nonetheless, the ensuing 1964 Televi- for forty years, establishing criteria for judging sion Act strengthened the powers of the ITA the performance of broadcasters which few and allotted the third channel to the BBC. The challenged, at least until the 1980s’ (2009: 95). report was bitterly attacked by most national For others, the Pilkington Report had an impor- newspapers, several of which had substantial tance that stretched even beyond broadcasting. holdings in ITV companies, and which saw the Thus, as Jean Seaton puts it: ‘The committee report’s strictures on populism in television had been asked to review the development of programming as an implicit critique of their television. In fact, they did much more, produc- own journalistic standards and as a threat to ing a report which judged the nation’s culture’ press freedom. This paper examines the press (quoted in Freedman 2003: 31), and Michael critique of the Pilkington Report, and suggests Bailey, Ben Clarke and John Walton claim that that it prefigures later press interventions in ‘insofar as the final report concerned itself with the broadcasting sphere, as well as press reac- the philosophy of “good broadcasting” and tions to the Leveson Inquiry. British culture more generally, one could argue that its many appraisals and accompanying Keywords: Richard Hoggart, Pilkington, popu- proposals belong as much to the “condition of lism, ITV, ITA England” tradition as they do to broadcasting history’ (2012: 139). Equally, Hoggart himself Introduction stated that the report presented an argument On 13 July 1960, the Conservative government not simply about broadcasting but about… of Harold Macmillan established a committee under the chairmanship of the industrialist … freedom and responsibility within com- Sir Harry Pilkington ‘to consider the future of mercialised democracies. It touched on the broadcasting services in the United Kingdom’ interrelations between cash, power and the and, more specifically, ‘to advise on the services organs for intellectual debate; it had to do which should in future be provided in the Unit- with a society which is changing rapidly and 4 Copyright 2015-1. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics. All rights reserved. Vol 12, No 1 2015 ICE CONFERENCE SPECIAL doesn’t understand its own changes; it had because it was a private enterprise, a rival to to do with the adequacy of our assumptions the BBC (which many Tories, then as now, dis- and vocabulary to many current social issues liked because it was a public corporation, and (1970: 189). one which they perceived to have a liberal bias), and provided freedom of choice in viewing, but The main purpose of this paper is to examine others disliked what they saw as its commercial the report’s attacks on populism in broadcast- values. On the other side of the political divide, ing, and particularly in ITV programming, and Labour had at one time pledged to abolish ITV, then to analyse the populist counter-attack on but dropped this idea before the 1959 General the report in significant sections of the national Election. Many Labour supporters may have press. But first it is necessary to sketch in some- disliked its commercialism, but, equally, others thing of the context in which the report was wanted a stake in the burgeoning consumer commissioned and published. society and saw nothing amiss in ITV’s adver- tisements and quiz show programmes with CONFERENCE ITV: Profit and populism their tempting prizes. PAPERS By the late 1950s ITV was becoming increas- ingly popular – and profitable. By concentrat- When the report was published in June 1962, ing increasingly on the most watched kinds the Pilkington Committee made it abundantly of programmes, ITV companies were making clear that, in its view, commercial values had an average annual pre-tax profit of 130 per exerted a largely negative pressure on tele- cent. It was at this point that Roy Thomson, of vision broadcasting. The BBC was given a Scottish Television, coined, extremely unwise- relatively clean bill of health, but ITV and its ly, the phrase about owning an ITV franchise regulator the Independent Television Author- being a ‘licence to print money’. ATV’s profits ity (ITA) were very heavily criticised. However, increased from less than £450,000 to more than even though the ITA was excoriated for fail- £4m between 1957 and 1958, and the shares ing to recognise what the committee saw as of its deputy chairman, Norman Collins, leapt television’s immense power to damage society, in value from £2,000 to £500,000. Within three the report nonetheless recommended that in months of ITV’s opening night, the control- future the authority, once armed with greater ler of programmes for Associated-Rediffusion, seriousness of purpose, should both plan the which owned one of the two franchises for Lon- schedules and sell advertising time, thus greatly don, was perfectly blunt about his intention to reducing the power of the advertisers over the change the schedules: ‘Let’s face it once and programme makers and schedulers within the for all, the public likes girls, wrestling, bright companies. The report also recommended that musicals, quiz shows and real-life drama. We the third channel be awarded to the BBC. gave them the Hallé Orchestra, Foreign Press Club, floodlit football and visits to the local ‘A candy-floss world’ fire station. From now on, what the public Before I go on to examine, and indeed defend, wants, it’s going to get’ (quoted in Sendall what the report had to say specifically about 1982: 328). For this he was admonished mildly populism, I do, however, want to acknowledge by ITA director-general Sir Ronald Fraser, who that aspects of its approach to broadcasting are responded: ‘A television company must have as likely to evoke as much hostility today within a policy of its own, and that policy must be media and cultural studies circles as they did something more than “giving the public what in the case of its many critics at the time of its it wants” unless we are prepared to say that publication. For example, it pinned its colours we no more respond to the social significance firmly to the ‘effects’ mast1: ‘Broadcasters must of television than to the social significance of recognise that television affects moral stan- toffee’ (quoted in ibid: 139). However, by 1960 dards by the constant repetition of the values Fraser had changed his tune, averring that: ‘If it shows, and by the assumptions underlying its you decide to have a system of people’s televi- programmes generally. They must remember, sion, then people’s television you must expect it too, that their audiences at almost all times to be, and it will reflect their likes and dislikes, include a great many children’ (HMSO 1962: their tastes and aversions, what they can com- 28). It also noted that ‘we strongly refute the prehend and what is beyond them’ (quoted in argument that because an effect has not been Milland 2004: 81). conclusively proved the broadcasting authori- ties need not concern themselves with it’ (ibid: The Conservatives were divided in their atti- 15). One of the report’s particular bugbears was tude to ITV, as they had been since even before ‘triviality’, which it appeared to think of as an its birth. There were those who supported it inherent quality of television: ICE CONFERENCE SPECIAL Copyright 2015-1. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics. All rights reserved. Vol 12, No 1 2015 5 Julian Petley Programmes which exemplified emotional ing the values and moral standards of our soci- tawdriness and mental timidity helped to ety’, so ‘by its nature broadcasting must be in cheapen both emotional and intellectual val- a constant and sensitive relationship with the ues.
Recommended publications
  • Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University In
    79I /f NIGERIAN MILITARY GOVERNMENT AND PRESS FREEDOM, 1966-79 THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Ehikioya Agboaye, B.A. Denton, Texas May, 1984 Agboaye, Ehikioya, Nigerian Military Government and Press Freedom, 1966-79. Master of Arts (Journalism), May, 1984, 3 tables, 111 pp., bibliography, 148 titles. The problem of this thesis is to examine the military- press relationship inNigeria from 1966 to 1979 and to determine whether activities of the military government contributed to violation of press freedom by prior restraint, postpublication censorship and penalization. Newspaper and magazine articles related to this study were analyzed. Interviews with some journalists and mili- tary personnel were also conducted. Materials collected show that the military violated some aspects of press freedom, but in most cases, however, journalists were free to criticize government activities. The judiciary prevented the military from arbitrarily using its power against the press. The findings show that although the military occasionally attempted suppressing the press, there are few instances that prove that journalists were denied press freedom. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES............ .P Chapter I. INTRODUCTION . 1 Statement of the Problem Purpose of the Study Significant Questions Definition of Terms Review of the Literature Significance of the Study Limitations Methodology Organization II. PREMILITARY ERA,.... 1865-1966...18 . From Colonial to Indigenous Press The Press in the First Republic III. PRESS ACTIONS IN THE MILITARY'S EARLY YEARS 29 Before the Civil War The Nigeria-Biaf ran War and After IV.
    [Show full text]
  • African Newspapers Currently Received by American Libraries Compiled by Mette Shayne Revised Summer 1999
    African Newspapers Currently Received by American Libraries Compiled by Mette Shayne Revised Summer 1999 INTRODUCTION This union list updates African Newspapers Currently Received by American Libraries compiled by Daniel A. Britz, Working Paper no. 8 African Studies Center, Boston, 1979. The holdings of 19 collections and the Foreign Newspapers Microfilm Project were surveyed during the summer of 1999. Material collected currently by Library of Congress, Nairobi (marked DLC#) is separated from the material which Nairobi sends to Library of Congress in Washington. The decision was made to exclude North African papers. These are included in Middle Eastern lists and in many of the reporting libraries entirely separate division handles them. Criteria for inclusion of titles on this list were basically in accord with the UNESCO definition of general interest newspapers. However, a number of titles were included that do not clearly fit into this definition such as religious newspapers from Southern Africa, and labor union and political party papers. Daily and less frequently published newspapers have been included. Frequency is noted when known. Sunday editions are listed separately only if the name of the Sunday edition is completely different from the weekday edition or if libraries take only the Sunday or only the weekday edition. Microfilm titles are included when known. Some titles may be included by one library, which in other libraries are listed as serials and, therefore, not recorded. In addition to enabling researchers to locate African newspapers, this list can be used to rationalize African newspaper subscriptions of American libraries. It is hoped that this list will both help in the identification of gaps and allow for some economy where there is substantial duplication.
    [Show full text]
  • Aligning the Newspaper and the People: Defining the Popular in the British Press Martin Conboy
    Aligning the Newspaper and the People: Defining the Popular in the British Press Martin Conboy Journal of European Periodical Studies, 5.1 (Summer 2020) ISSN 2506-6587 Content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence The Journal of European Periodical Studies is hosted by Ghent University Website: ojs.ugent.be/jeps To cite this article: Martin Conboy, ‘Aligning the Newspaper and the People: Defining the Popular in the British Press’, Journal of European Periodical Studies, 5.1 (Summer 2020), 7–23 Aligning the Newspaper and the People: Defining the Popular in the British Press Martin Conboy University of Sheffield [email protected] ABSTRACT TheDaily Mirror developed as the first general picture daily in Britain and had become the nation’s best-selling daily newspaper by the end of the First World War. Its turn to the political left came from the mid-1930s as a marketing ploy to establish a distinctive identity within a crowded middle-market. This commercially astute targeting of a mass readership, delivering the most successful daily newspaper in British history by the mid-1960s, illustrates a great deal of the complexity of the term ‘popular’ when used in relation to mass media. It drew on the traditions of best-selling magazines, Sunday newspapers, and American tabloid pioneers combined with modern techniques of market research to identify a new and broad readership. The explicit integration of readers’ views, deployment of brash headlines, and a bold page layout highlighting photography, in editorial combination, made the paper the forerunner of a distinctly British tabloid style that would become a world-leading trend.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Daily Paper Rule Britannia’:1 the British Press, British Public Opinion, and the End of Empire in Africa, 1957-60
    The London School of Economics and Political Science ‘Does the Daily Paper rule Britannia’:1 The British press, British public opinion, and the end of empire in Africa, 1957-60 Rosalind Coffey A thesis submitted to the International History Department of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, August 2015 1 Taken from a reader’s letter to the Nyasaland Times, quoted in an article on 2 February 1960, front page (hereafter fp). All newspaper articles which follow were consulted at The British Library Newspaper Library. 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 99, 969 words. 2 Abstract This thesis examines the role of British newspaper coverage of Africa in the process of decolonisation between 1957 and 1960. It considers events in the Gold Coast/Ghana, Kenya, the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland, South Africa, and the Belgian Congo/Congo.
    [Show full text]
  • Monopoly, Power and Politics in Fleet Street: the Controversial Birth of IPC Magazines, 1958-63
    Monopoly, Power and Politics in Fleet Street: The Controversial Birth of IPC Magazines, 1958-63 Howard Cox and Simon Mowatt Britain’s newspaper and magazine publishing business did not fare particularly well during the 1950s. With leading newspaper proprietors placing their desire for political influence above that of financial performance, and with working practices in Fleet Street becoming virtually ungovernable, it was little surprise to find many leading periodical publishers on the verge of bankruptcy by the decade’s end. A notable exception to this general picture of financial mismanagement was provided by the chain of enterprises controlled by Roy Thomson. Having first established a base in Scotland in 1953 through the acquisition of the Scotsman newspaper publishing group, the Canadian entrepreneur brought a new commercial attitude and business strategy to bear on Britain’s periodical publishing industry. Using profits generated by a string of successful media activities, in 1959 Thomson bought a place in Fleet Street through the acquisition of Lord Kemsley’s chain of newspapers, which included the prestigious Sunday Times. Early in 1961 Thomson came to an agreement with Christopher Chancellor, the recently appointed chief executive of Odhams Press, to merge their two publishing groups and thereby create a major new force in the British newspaper and magazine publishing industry. The deal was never consummated however. Within days of publicly announcing the merger, Odhams found its shareholders being seduced by an improved offer from Cecil King, Chairman of Daily Mirror Newspapers, Ltd., which they duly accepted. The Mirror’s acquisition of Odhams was deeply controversial, mainly because it brought under common ownership the two left-leaning British popular newspapers, the Mirror and the Herald.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Britain Newspaper Collection
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8d224gm No online items Inventory of the Great Britain newspaper collection Hoover Institution Archives Staff Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 2019 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: https://www.hoover.org/library-archives Inventory of the Great Britain 2019C144 1 newspaper collection Title: Great Britain newspaper collection Date (inclusive): 1856-2001 Collection Number: 2019C144 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: In English, Estonian, Danish, Dutch, Norwegian, German, French and Greek. Physical Description: 452 oversize boxes(686.7 Linear Feet) Abstract: The newspapers in this collection were originally collected by the Hoover Institution Library and transferred to the Archives in 2019. The Great Britain newspaper collection (1856-2001) comprises ninety-seven different titles of publication in English, Estonian, Danish, Dutch, Norwegian, German, French, and Greek. All titles within this collection have been further analyzed in Stanford University Libraries catalog. Hoover Institution Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights Due to the assembled nature of this collection, copyright status varies across its scope. Copyright is assumed to be held by the original newspaper publications, which should be contacted wherein public domain has not yet passed. The Hoover Institution can neither grant nor deny permission to publish or reproduce materials from this collection. Acquisition Information Materials were acquired by the Hoover Institution Archives in 2019 from the Hoover Institution Library. Preferred Citation The following information is suggested along with your citation: [Title/Date of Publication], Great Britain newspaper collection [Box no.], Hoover Institution Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis in Britain's Press
    THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY June 1, 1957 From the London End Crisis in Britain's Press THE dwindling number of resulted in the 'Herald's' deci­ ing revenue becomes increasing­ British provincial daily sion to choose the former in the ly dependent on the circulation newspapers, the persistent talk hope that circulation will in­ levels and the class of readers of rising costs and merges in crease but since its readers find which particular newspaper's Fleet Street, the particularly that they obtain more for their reach. For example, the famous high casualty rate among week­ money for this type of journal­ Hulton Survey of 1955 showed lies and now the impending ism in the 'Daily Mirror', the that 17.4 per cent of the 1.3 amalgamation of the two na­ 'Herald' is losing both types of million of "well-to-do" readers tional dailies—'News Chronicle' readers so that today it has a in the country bought the and the 'Daily Herald' brings to circulation of no more than 1½. 'Times'. The majority of this the open a crisis, which for some million compared to over 2¼ income group (53 per cent) years was, in terms of news, million in 1948. The circulation however read the less ponderous confined to the editorial rooms of the 'Chonicle' too has ten­ but starkly conservative 'Daily or the private meetings of ded to fall over the past 10 Mail' and 'Daily Telegraph'. The anxious boards of directors. The years. It is now being suggested "working class or the poor" crisis takes the broadest possi­ that the circulation of these group who represented 26,3 ble character.
    [Show full text]
  • War Torn Manchester, Its Newspapers and the Luftwaffe's Christmas Blitz
    War Torn Manchester, its newspapers and the Luftwaffe’s Christmas Blitz of 1940 By Guy Hodgson 1 CONTENTS PREFACE XX ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS XX INTRODUCTION XX PART I CHAPTER 1: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE 1. ‘A JUMBLED-UP NONDESCRIPT PLACE’ X 2. THE CHRISTMAS BLITZ X CHAPTER 2: THE PRESS AND THE MYTHOLOGY AND THE BLITZ 1. ‘HARLOTS OF DEMOCRACY’ XX 2. CREATION OF THE MYTH XX CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY 1. APPROACHING THE SOURCES XX 2. NEWSPAPER PRODUCTION XX 3. DISSEMINATION XX 4. THE AUDIENCE XX 5. LIMITS OF THE RESEARCH XX PART II CHAPTER 4: THE NEWSPAPERS 1. PUTTING ON THE BATTLE DRESS XX 2. THE EDITORS XX 3. ‘SERIOUS AGAIN IN THE MORNING’ XX CHAPTER 5: CENSORSHIP 1. A BARRAGE OF D NOTICES XX 2. ‘NO HELP TO THE ENEMY BUT ARE THEY ANY USE TO US?’ XX 3. GUIDANCE TO EDITORS XX 4. FIT TO PRINT: CENSORSHIP AND THE MANCHESTER BLITZ XX 5. SELF CENSORSHIP AT THE MANCHESTER GUARDIAN XX CHAPTER 6: PROPAGANDA AND THE MANAGEMENT OF OPINION 1. THE FIRST WORLD WAR MODEL XX 2. BEFORE THE MANCHESTER BLITZ XX 3. THE BLITZ EDITIONS XX 4. THE POST-BLITZ EDITIONS XX 5. ‘NO ONE DARE REPORT THE TEARS’ XX CHAPTER 7: ALL IN THIS TOGETHER? 1. THE SOCIAL DIVIDE XX 2. CRIME AND NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF THE COURTS XX 2 4. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR XX 5. A TEMPLATE OF CHEERFULNESS XX CHAPTER 8: THE AFTERMATH OF CHRISTMAS 1940 1. OBSERVING THE MASSES XX 3. REPORT ON MANCHESTER AND LIVERPOOL XX 4. CONTEMPORARY REACTION XX 5. LOOKING BACK ON MANCHESTER’S BLITZ XX 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Harcup(2E) Template 1/13/2009 5:52 PM Page 1
    Harcup-CH-01:Harcup(2e) Template 1/13/2009 5:52 PM Page 1 one who, what, where, when, why and how? an introduction to journalism Harcup-CH-01:Harcup(2e) Template 1/13/2009 5:52 PM Page 2 Harcup-CH-01:Harcup(2e) Template 1/13/2009 5:52 PM Page 3 key terms Communication; Journalism; Churnalism; Journalism education; Public sphere; Fourth estate; Free press; Ideology; Agency; Ethics Journalism or churnalism? Communication “Journalism is a chaotic form of earning, ragged at The basic questions of journalism highlighted in the title the edges, full of snakes, con artists and even the of this chapter – Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? – are echoed in an early model of the mass occasional misunderstood martyr,” writes Andrew communication process, formulated by Harold Lasswell Marr in his book My Trade . “Outside organised in 1948. For Lasswell, analysis of the media begins with crime, it is the most powerful and enjoyable of the the question: “Who says what to whom, through what anti-professions” (Marr, 2005: 3). So journalism is channel and with what effect?” (McQuail, 2000: 52–53). a trade, or a craft, rather than a “proper” profession This has been termed a “transmission” model of such as medicine or the law. But what is communication, because it is essentially one-way, from journalism for ? To pay the mortgage, if you ask sender to receiver. This and later versions of the trans - many hacks. But journalism is about more than mission model have been challenged in recent decades as too simplistic, too linear, too mono-directional to that.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Historical Studies
    University of Bristol Department of Historical Studies Best undergraduate dissertations of 2019 Shona Wilcox ‘Dial 999!’: Public Panic, the State and the Press in Interwar Britain The Department of Historical Studies at the University of Bristol is com- mitted to the advancement of historical knowledge and understanding, and to research of the highest order. Our undergraduates are part of that en- deavour. Since 2009, the Department has published the best of the annual disserta- tions produced by our final year undergraduates in recognition of the ex- cellent research work being undertaken by our students. This was one of the best of this year’s final year undergraduate disserta- tions. Please note: this dissertation is published in the state it was submitted for examination. Thus the author has not been able to correct errors and/or departures from departmental guidelines for the presentation of dissertations (e.g. in the formatting of its footnotes and bibliography). © The author, 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means without the prior permission in writing of the author, or as expressly permitted by law. All citations of this work must be properly acknowledged. ‘Dial 999!’: Public Panic, the State and the Press in Interwar Britain Figure 1: M. Smith, The Humorist, 14th August 1937. 2 Table of Contents: Introduction 4 Chapter 1: Generating Panic 9 Chapter 2: State to the Rescue? 15 Chapter 3: A Success Story? 21 Conclusion 27 Appendix 29 Bibliography 40 3 Introduction ‘She Just Dialled 999’, read the rather nonchalant headline of the Daily Herald on July 8th, 1937.1 Yet, the event it described was far from unremarkable.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitchell Library Newspapers
    Mitchell Library Newspapers Title Print holdings Film holdings Current Glasgow Aberdeen Journal n/a 1747 Dec - 1853 Dec Aberdeen Press & Journal 1975 Jan - current n/a YES Advertiser for Shettleston & Tollcross & 1896 31 March (single issue) 1896 31 March (single issue) surrounding districts YES Afternoon Bulletin 1926 6 May (single sheet) n/a Agitator 1833 9 Mar - 13 April n/a Airdrie and Coatbridge Advertiser 1899 - 1957 / last year - current 1899 - 1957 YES Alba 1908 - 1909 n/a Alliance News 1862 - 1864 n/a Ardrossan and Saltcoats Herald 1866 - 1888 n/a Arrival; newspaper of Greater Glasgow 1985 May - Aug 1988 incomplete n/a Tourist Board Asian Age 1996 - June 2001 n/a Ayr Advertiser 1829 - 1888 n/a Ayr Observer 1837 - 1886 n/a Bailie 1872 23 Oct - 28 April 1926 1872 23 Oct - 28 April 1926 YES Baillieston, Tollcross & Shettleston Express n/a 1896 31 Mar - 1900 13 Mar YES Banner (Pollok) 1983 - 85, 1992 - 99 incomplete n/a YES Banner South later Glasgow Banner 1975 Nov (single issue) n/a YES Beacon, Glasgow 1897 Apr - Aug n/a YES Beardmore News conts Forge News 1917 18 Oct - Dec 1919 1919 - 1921 YES Belfast Telegraph 1995 13 March - 2006 March n/a Berwickshire News 1881 October - 1886 n/a Bridgeton Advertiser 1891 April - Dec incomplete 1889 Sep - 1891 Dec YES Bridgeton Advertiser & Single Tax Review became Bridgeton Single Tax Review & 1889 7 Sept - 5 October1889 n/a Advertiser YES © Mitchell Library, Glasgow. You may download and/or print for your own personal use. Please do not distribute without permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 23/09/2021 18:03:53
    Manchester and its press under the bomb: Britain’s ‘other Fleet Street’ and its contribution to a myth of the blitz Item Type Thesis or dissertation Authors Hodgson, Guy R. Publisher University of Chester Download date 23/09/2021 18:03:53 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/314716 This work has been submitted to ChesterRep – the University of Chester’s online research repository http://chesterrep.openrepository.com Author(s): Guy Richard Hodgson Title: Manchester and its press under the bomb: Britain’s ‘other Fleet Street’ and its contribution to a myth of the blitz Date: January 2014 Originally published as: University of Chester PhD thesis Example citation: Hodgson, G.R. (2014). Manchester and its press under the bomb: Britain’s ‘other Fleet Street’ and its contribution to a myth of the blitz. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Chester, United Kingdom. Version of item: Submitted version Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10034/314716 Manchester and its Press Under the Bomb Britain’s ‘Other Fleet Street’ and its Contribution to a Myth of the Blitz by Guy Richard Hodgson Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Chester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2014 II CONTENTS ABSTRACT VI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VII INTRODUCTION 1 PART I: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK/LITERATURE REVIEW CHAPTER 1: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE 1. THE AGE OF THE PRESS BARONS 10 2. BRITISH NEWSPAPERS IN THE COUNTDOWN TO WAR 15 3. CONCLUSION 21 CHAPTER 2: ANALYTICAL CONCEPTS AND HISTORIOGRAPHY 1. MYTHOLOGY AND THE BLITZ 22 2. THE LITERATURE 31 2.1 THE BLITZ 32 2.2 MANCHESTER AND OTHER BRITISH CITIES 47 2-3 MORALE, PROPAGANDA AND CENSORSHIP 53 2.4 NEWSPAPERS, PRESS BARONS AND THE BBC 58 3.
    [Show full text]