Mouse Anapc1 Conditional Knockout Project (CRISPR/Cas9)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mouse Anapc1 Conditional Knockout Project (CRISPR/Cas9) https://www.alphaknockout.com Mouse Anapc1 Conditional Knockout Project (CRISPR/Cas9) Objective: To create a Anapc1 conditional knockout Mouse model (C57BL/6J) by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Strategy summary: The Anapc1 gene (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_008569 ; Ensembl: ENSMUSG00000014355 ) is located on Mouse chromosome 2. 48 exons are identified, with the ATG start codon in exon 2 and the TGA stop codon in exon 48 (Transcript: ENSMUST00000014499). Exon 8~10 will be selected as conditional knockout region (cKO region). Deletion of this region should result in the loss of function of the Mouse Anapc1 gene. To engineer the targeting vector, homologous arms and cKO region will be generated by PCR using BAC clone RP23-402F15 as template. Cas9, gRNA and targeting vector will be co-injected into fertilized eggs for cKO Mouse production. The pups will be genotyped by PCR followed by sequencing analysis. Note: Exon 8 starts from about 11.76% of the coding region. The knockout of Exon 8~10 will result in frameshift of the gene. The size of intron 7 for 5'-loxP site insertion: 1963 bp, and the size of intron 10 for 3'-loxP site insertion: 2393 bp. The size of effective cKO region: ~2197 bp. The cKO region does not have any other known gene. Page 1 of 8 https://www.alphaknockout.com Overview of the Targeting Strategy Wildtype allele 5' gRNA region gRNA region 3' 1 7 8 9 10 48 Targeting vector Targeted allele Constitutive KO allele (After Cre recombination) Legends Exon of mouse Anapc1 Homology arm cKO region loxP site Page 2 of 8 https://www.alphaknockout.com Overview of the Dot Plot Window size: 10 bp Forward Reverse Complement Sequence 12 Note: The sequence of homologous arms and cKO region is aligned with itself to determine if there are tandem repeats. No significant tandem repeat is found in the dot plot matrix. So this region is suitable for PCR screening or sequencing analysis. Overview of the GC Content Distribution Window size: 300 bp Sequence 12 Summary: Full Length(8697bp) | A(26.34% 2291) | C(18.86% 1640) | T(33.49% 2913) | G(21.31% 1853) Note: The sequence of homologous arms and cKO region is analyzed to determine the GC content. No significant high GC-content region is found. So this region is suitable for PCR screening or sequencing analysis. Page 3 of 8 https://www.alphaknockout.com BLAT Search Results (up) QUERY SCORE START END QSIZE IDENTITY CHROM STRAND START END SPAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- browser details YourSeq 3000 1 3000 3000 100.0% chr2 - 128676498 128679497 3000 browser details YourSeq 72 2420 2541 3000 82.8% chr18 + 56593508 56593620 113 browser details YourSeq 69 2816 2944 3000 85.4% chr14 - 122242319 122242442 124 browser details YourSeq 68 2453 2844 3000 94.8% chr11 - 101803159 101803648 490 browser details YourSeq 68 2813 2897 3000 93.3% chr16 + 10986114 10986197 84 browser details YourSeq 67 2804 2925 3000 89.6% chr4 + 133785716 133785844 129 browser details YourSeq 63 2437 2920 3000 92.0% chr19 - 40638445 40638973 529 browser details YourSeq 63 2404 2496 3000 81.5% chr4 + 150399360 150399430 71 browser details YourSeq 61 2150 2318 3000 88.9% chr4 - 44470649 44470816 168 browser details YourSeq 59 2151 2302 3000 87.2% chr10 + 68242587 68242751 165 browser details YourSeq 59 2420 2503 3000 83.4% chr1 + 154069397 154069476 80 browser details YourSeq 59 2420 2503 3000 83.4% chr1 + 68736512 68736591 80 browser details YourSeq 58 2806 2871 3000 94.0% chr8 + 51029370 51029435 66 browser details YourSeq 58 2815 2897 3000 84.8% chr8 + 13056059 13056138 80 browser details YourSeq 57 2814 2897 3000 85.1% chr12 - 90287347 90287426 80 browser details YourSeq 56 2812 2877 3000 92.5% chr2 + 65771486 65771551 66 browser details YourSeq 55 1911 2230 3000 67.2% chr9 - 42954372 42954468 97 browser details YourSeq 55 2422 2501 3000 86.0% chr17 - 24871336 24871411 76 browser details YourSeq 55 2215 2381 3000 85.3% chr1 + 60367360 60367519 160 browser details YourSeq 54 2170 2444 3000 93.5% chr5 - 130290090 130290507 418 Note: The 3000 bp section upstream of Exon 8 is BLAT searched against the genome. No significant similarity is found. BLAT Search Results (down) QUERY SCORE START END QSIZE IDENTITY CHROM STRAND START END SPAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- browser details YourSeq 3000 1 3000 3000 100.0% chr2 - 128671301 128674300 3000 browser details YourSeq 190 306 881 3000 84.1% chr1 - 59836647 59837163 517 browser details YourSeq 182 318 878 3000 88.7% chr10 - 88471342 88837767 366426 browser details YourSeq 173 271 869 3000 87.4% chr19 - 4433404 4434124 721 browser details YourSeq 150 2519 2683 3000 95.8% chr4 - 87030349 87030529 181 browser details YourSeq 150 274 544 3000 84.5% chr15 - 58027007 58027312 306 browser details YourSeq 149 2516 2684 3000 94.1% chr3 - 95749194 95749362 169 browser details YourSeq 146 2508 2682 3000 93.0% chr11 + 74802542 74802718 177 browser details YourSeq 143 2541 2779 3000 86.8% chr10 - 79693337 79693496 160 browser details YourSeq 139 2517 2683 3000 93.3% chr13 - 8868126 8868301 176 browser details YourSeq 138 712 881 3000 90.6% chr16 - 60162342 60162511 170 browser details YourSeq 136 709 881 3000 91.5% chr9 + 64158076 64158252 177 browser details YourSeq 133 713 881 3000 95.3% chr7 - 112643490 112643659 170 browser details YourSeq 132 712 898 3000 91.8% chr5 + 31678827 31679008 182 browser details YourSeq 131 2541 2682 3000 96.5% chr12 - 79439295 79439437 143 browser details YourSeq 131 711 881 3000 88.9% chr6 + 30002106 30002278 173 browser details YourSeq 130 715 878 3000 90.3% chr2 - 119892472 119892638 167 browser details YourSeq 128 711 881 3000 87.6% chr3 - 88691353 88691524 172 browser details YourSeq 128 2543 2745 3000 86.4% chr10 - 62968536 62968674 139 browser details YourSeq 128 2543 2684 3000 95.1% chr2 + 34393498 34393639 142 Note: The 3000 bp section downstream of Exon 10 is BLAT searched against the genome. No significant similarity is found. Page 4 of 8 https://www.alphaknockout.com Gene and protein information: Anapc1 anaphase promoting complex subunit 1 [ Mus musculus (house mouse) ] Gene ID: 17222, updated on 10-Oct-2019 Gene summary Official Symbol Anapc1 provided by MGI Official Full Name anaphase promoting complex subunit 1 provided by MGI Primary source MGI:MGI:103097 See related Ensembl:ENSMUSG00000014355 Gene type protein coding RefSeq status VALIDATED Organism Mus musculus Lineage Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Euarchontoglires; Glires; Rodentia; Myomorpha; Muroidea; Muridae; Murinae; Mus; Mus Also known as Apc1; Mcpr; tsg24; AI047775; AI853536; AW547281; 2610021O03Rik Expression Ubiquitous expression in CNS E11.5 (RPKM 13.6), limb E14.5 (RPKM 12.9) and 28 other tissues See more Orthologs human all Genomic context Location: 2; 2 F1 See Anapc1 in Genome Data Viewer Exon count: 50 Annotation release Status Assembly Chr Location 108 current GRCm38.p6 (GCF_000001635.26) 2 NC_000068.7 (128610083..128687406, complement) Build 37.2 previous assembly MGSCv37 (GCF_000001635.18) 2 NC_000068.6 (128435819..128513131, complement) Chromosome 2 - NC_000068.7 Page 5 of 8 https://www.alphaknockout.com Transcript information: This gene has 11 transcripts Gene: Anapc1 ENSMUSG00000014355 Description anaphase promoting complex subunit 1 [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:103097] Gene Synonyms 2610021O03Rik, Apc1, Mcpr, tsg24 Location Chromosome 2: 128,610,104-128,687,391 reverse strand. GRCm38:CM000995.2 About this gene This gene has 11 transcripts (splice variants), 216 orthologues, is a member of 1 Ensembl protein family and is associated with 2 phenotypes. Transcripts Name Transcript ID bp Protein Translation ID Biotype CCDS UniProt Flags Anapc1-201 ENSMUST00000014499.9 8942 1944aa ENSMUSP00000014499.3 Protein coding CCDS16715 P53995 TSL:1 GENCODE basic APPRIS P1 Anapc1-203 ENSMUST00000110333.1 4214 1213aa ENSMUSP00000105962.1 Protein coding - A2ATQ5 TSL:1 GENCODE basic Anapc1-202 ENSMUST00000110332.1 1214 80aa ENSMUSP00000105961.1 Protein coding - Q6PG65 TSL:1 GENCODE basic Anapc1-204 ENSMUST00000123503.1 3261 No protein - lncRNA - - TSL:1 Anapc1-206 ENSMUST00000134485.1 3007 No protein - lncRNA - - TSL:1 Anapc1-209 ENSMUST00000151171.1 836 No protein - lncRNA - - TSL:2 Anapc1-208 ENSMUST00000145906.7 742 No protein - lncRNA - - TSL:2 Anapc1-205 ENSMUST00000124418.1 691 No protein - lncRNA - - TSL:2 Anapc1-210 ENSMUST00000154320.1 667 No protein - lncRNA - - TSL:3 Anapc1-207 ENSMUST00000143007.1 627 No protein - lncRNA - - TSL:3 Anapc1-211 ENSMUST00000154995.1 564 No protein - lncRNA - - TSL:3 Page 6 of 8 https://www.alphaknockout.com 97.29 kb Forward strand Genes Gm14007-201 >processed pseudogene (Comprehensive set... Contigs AL928910.7 > Genes (Comprehensive set... < Gm39929-201lncRNA < Anapc1-205lncRNA < Anapc1-210lncRNA < Anapc1-203protein coding < Anapc1-201protein coding < Anapc1-209lncRNA < Anapc1-204lncRNA < Anapc1-206lncRNA < Anapc1-208lncRNA < Anapc1-207lncRNA < Anapc1-202protein coding < Anapc1-211lncRNA Regulatory Build Reverse strand 97.29 kb Regulation Legend CTCF Enhancer Open Chromatin Promoter Promoter Flank Gene Legend Protein Coding Ensembl protein coding merged Ensembl/Havana Non-Protein Coding pseudogene RNA gene Page 7 of 8 https://www.alphaknockout.com Transcript: ENSMUST00000014499 < Anapc1-201protein coding Reverse strand 77.29 kb ENSMUSP00000014... MobiDB lite Low complexity (Seg) Pfam Anaphase-promoting complex subunit 1 Anaphase-promoting complex subunit 1, C-terminal Proteasome/cyclosome repeat PANTHER Anaphase-promoting complex subunit 1 All sequence SNPs/i... Sequence variants (dbSNP and all other sources) Variant Legend missense variant splice region variant synonymous variant Scale bar 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1944 We wish to acknowledge the following valuable scientific information resources: Ensembl, MGI, NCBI, UCSC. Page 8 of 8.
Recommended publications
  • Table S2.Up Or Down Regulated Genes in Tcof1 Knockdown Neuroblastoma N1E-115 Cells Involved in Differentbiological Process Anal
    Table S2.Up or down regulated genes in Tcof1 knockdown neuroblastoma N1E-115 cells involved in differentbiological process analysed by DAVID database Pop Pop Fold Term PValue Genes Bonferroni Benjamini FDR Hits Total Enrichment GO:0044257~cellular protein catabolic 2.77E-10 MKRN1, PPP2R5C, VPRBP, MYLIP, CDC16, ERLEC1, MKRN2, CUL3, 537 13588 1.944851 8.64E-07 8.64E-07 5.02E-07 process ISG15, ATG7, PSENEN, LOC100046898, CDCA3, ANAPC1, ANAPC2, ANAPC5, SOCS3, ENC1, SOCS4, ASB8, DCUN1D1, PSMA6, SIAH1A, TRIM32, RNF138, GM12396, RNF20, USP17L5, FBXO11, RAD23B, NEDD8, UBE2V2, RFFL, CDC GO:0051603~proteolysis involved in 4.52E-10 MKRN1, PPP2R5C, VPRBP, MYLIP, CDC16, ERLEC1, MKRN2, CUL3, 534 13588 1.93519 1.41E-06 7.04E-07 8.18E-07 cellular protein catabolic process ISG15, ATG7, PSENEN, LOC100046898, CDCA3, ANAPC1, ANAPC2, ANAPC5, SOCS3, ENC1, SOCS4, ASB8, DCUN1D1, PSMA6, SIAH1A, TRIM32, RNF138, GM12396, RNF20, USP17L5, FBXO11, RAD23B, NEDD8, UBE2V2, RFFL, CDC GO:0044265~cellular macromolecule 6.09E-10 MKRN1, PPP2R5C, VPRBP, MYLIP, CDC16, ERLEC1, MKRN2, CUL3, 609 13588 1.859332 1.90E-06 6.32E-07 1.10E-06 catabolic process ISG15, RBM8A, ATG7, LOC100046898, PSENEN, CDCA3, ANAPC1, ANAPC2, ANAPC5, SOCS3, ENC1, SOCS4, ASB8, DCUN1D1, PSMA6, SIAH1A, TRIM32, RNF138, GM12396, RNF20, XRN2, USP17L5, FBXO11, RAD23B, UBE2V2, NED GO:0030163~protein catabolic process 1.81E-09 MKRN1, PPP2R5C, VPRBP, MYLIP, CDC16, ERLEC1, MKRN2, CUL3, 556 13588 1.87839 5.64E-06 1.41E-06 3.27E-06 ISG15, ATG7, PSENEN, LOC100046898, CDCA3, ANAPC1, ANAPC2, ANAPC5, SOCS3, ENC1, SOCS4,
    [Show full text]
  • 2Q13 Microdeletions
    2q13 microdeletions rarechromo.org 2q13 microdeletions A 2q13 microdeletion is a rare genetic condition caused by a small piece of missing genetic material from one of the body’s chromosomes - chromosome 2. Deletions can vary in size but those that are too small to be visible under the microscope using standard techniques are called microdeletions. For typical and healthy development, chromosomes should contain the expected amount of genetic material. Like most other chromosome disorders, having a missing piece of chromosome 2 may affect the development and intellectual abilities of a child. The outcome of having a 2q13 microdeletion is very variable and depends on a number of factors including what and how much genetic material is missing. Background on chromosomes Our bodies are made up of different types of cells, almost all of which contain the same chromosomes. Each chromosome consists of DNA that carries the code for hundreds to thousands of genes. Genes can be thought of as individual instruction booklets (or recipes) that contain all the genetic information that tells the body how to develop, grow and function. Chromosomes (and hence genes) usually come in pairs with one member of each chromosome pair being inherited from each parent. Most cells of the human body have a total of 46 (23 pairs of) chromosomes. The egg and the sperm cells, however, have 23 unpaired chromosomes, so that when the egg and sperm join together at conception, the chromosomes pair up to make a total of 46. Of these 46 chromosomes, 44 are grouped in 22 pairs, numbered 1 to 22.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Q13 Microduplications
    2q13 microduplications rarechromo.org 2q13 microduplications A 2q13 microduplication is a rare genetic condition caused by a small piece of extra genetic material from one of the body’s chromosomes - chromosome 2. Duplications can vary in size but those that are too small to be visible under the microscope using standard techniques are called microduplications. For typical and healthy development, chromosomes should contain the expected amount of genetic material. Like most other chromosome disorders, having an extra piece of chromosome 2 may affect the development and intellectual abilities of a child. The outcome of having a 2q13 microduplication is very variable and depends on a number of factors including what and how much genetic material is duplicated. Background on chromosomes Our bodies are made up of different types of cells, almost all of which contain the same chromosomes. Each chromosome consists of DNA that carries the code for hundreds to thousands of genes. Genes can be thought of as individual instruction booklets (or recipes) that contain all the genetic information that tells the body how to develop, grow and function. Chromosomes (and hence genes) usually come in pairs with one member of each chromosome pair being inherited from each parent. Most cells of the human body have a total of 46 (23 pairs of) chromosomes. The egg and the sperm cells, however, have 23 unpaired chromosomes, so that when the egg and sperm join together at conception, the chromosomes pair up to make 46 in total. Of these 46 chromosomes, 44 are grouped in 22 pairs, numbered 1 to 22.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multiethnic Genome-Wide Analysis of 44,039 Individuals Identifies 41 New Loci Associated with Central Corneal Thickness
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-1037-7 OPEN A multiethnic genome-wide analysis of 44,039 individuals identifies 41 new loci associated with central corneal thickness ✉ Hélène Choquet 1 , Ronald B. Melles2, Jie Yin1, Thomas J. Hoffmann 3,4, Khanh K. Thai1, Mark N. Kvale3, 1234567890():,; Yambazi Banda3, Alison J. Hardcastle 5,6, Stephen J. Tuft7, M. Maria Glymour4, Catherine Schaefer 1, ✉ Neil Risch1,3,4, K. Saidas Nair8, Pirro G. Hysi 9,10,11 & Eric Jorgenson 1 Central corneal thickness (CCT) is one of the most heritable human traits, with broad-sense heritability estimates ranging between 0.68 to 0.95. Despite the high heritability and numerous previous association studies, only 8.5% of CCT variance is currently explained. Here, we report the results of a multiethnic meta-analysis of available genome-wide asso- ciation studies in which we find association between CCT and 98 genomic loci, of which 41 are novel. Among these loci, 20 were significantly associated with keratoconus, and one (RAPSN rs3740685) was significantly associated with glaucoma after Bonferroni correction. Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis suggests that thinner CCT does not causally increase the risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. This large CCT study explains up to 14.2% of CCT variance and increases substantially our understanding of the etiology of CCT var- iation. This may open new avenues of investigation into human ocular traits and their rela- tionship to the risk of vision disorders. 1 Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), Division of Research, Oakland, CA 94612, USA. 2 KPNC, Department of Ophthalmology, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Disruption of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex Confers Resistance to TTK Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Disruption of the anaphase-promoting complex confers resistance to TTK inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer K. L. Thua,b, J. Silvestera,b, M. J. Elliotta,b, W. Ba-alawib,c, M. H. Duncana,b, A. C. Eliaa,b, A. S. Merb, P. Smirnovb,c, Z. Safikhanib, B. Haibe-Kainsb,c,d,e, T. W. Maka,b,c,1, and D. W. Cescona,b,f,1 aCampbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1L7; bPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1L7; cDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1L7; dDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1L7; eOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 0A3; and fDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1L7 Contributed by T. W. Mak, December 27, 2017 (sent for review November 9, 2017; reviewed by Mark E. Burkard and Sabine Elowe) TTK protein kinase (TTK), also known as Monopolar spindle 1 (MPS1), ator of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which delays is a key regulator of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which anaphase until all chromosomes are properly attached to the functions to maintain genomic integrity. TTK has emerged as a mitotic spindle, TTK has an integral role in maintaining genomic promising therapeutic target in human cancers, including triple- integrity (6). Because most cancer cells are aneuploid, they are negative breast cancer (TNBC). Several TTK inhibitors (TTKis) are heavily reliant on the SAC to adequately segregate their abnormal being evaluated in clinical trials, and an understanding of karyotypes during mitosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Targeting and Enhancing Anticancer Efficacy of Oncolytic HSV-1 to Midkine Expressing Tumors
    University of Cincinnati Date: 12/20/2010 I, Arturo R Maldonado , hereby submit this original work as part of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Developmental Biology. It is entitled: Molecular Targeting and Enhancing Anticancer Efficacy of Oncolytic HSV-1 to Midkine Expressing Tumors Student's name: Arturo R Maldonado This work and its defense approved by: Committee chair: Jeffrey Whitsett Committee member: Timothy Crombleholme, MD Committee member: Dan Wiginton, PhD Committee member: Rhonda Cardin, PhD Committee member: Tim Cripe 1297 Last Printed:1/11/2011 Document Of Defense Form Molecular Targeting and Enhancing Anticancer Efficacy of Oncolytic HSV-1 to Midkine Expressing Tumors A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTORATE OF PHILOSOPHY (PH.D.) in the Division of Molecular & Developmental Biology 2010 By Arturo Rafael Maldonado B.A., University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida June 1993 M.D., New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey June 1999 Committee Chair: Jeffrey A. Whitsett, M.D. Advisor: Timothy M. Crombleholme, M.D. Timothy P. Cripe, M.D. Ph.D. Dan Wiginton, Ph.D. Rhonda D. Cardin, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Since 1999, cancer has surpassed heart disease as the number one cause of death in the US for people under the age of 85. Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor (MPNST), a common malignancy in patients with Neurofibromatosis, and colorectal cancer are midkine- producing tumors with high mortality rates. In vitro and preclinical xenograft models of MPNST were utilized in this dissertation to study the role of midkine (MDK), a tumor-specific gene over- expressed in these tumors and to test the efficacy of a MDK-transcriptionally targeted oncolytic HSV-1 (oHSV).
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S5
    Supplementary Table S5 Predicted impact on structural MutatorAssessor MutatorAssessor Polyphen-2 Polyphen-2 Gene Mutation In structure? Surface/buried Implication/comment integrity Func. Impact FI score Prediction score ANAPC1 E139Q No low 1.5 benign 0.308 ANAPC1 F211V Yes Buried Destabilising Mild/Strong medium 2.83 probably damaging 0.992 ANAPC1 G602D Yes Surface Allows bend at loop; G>D destabilising Strong medium 2.02 probably damaging 0.973 ANAPC1 H1661Y Yes Surface Destabilising; H situates in hydrophilic environment Mild/Strong medium 2.155 possibly damaging 0.826 ANAPC1 H27R Yes Buried Destabilising Strong low 0.895 probably damaging 0.981 ANAPC1 M525V No low 1.32 benign 0.001 ANAPC1 N280K Yes Buried Destabilising Strong medium 2.015 benign 0.18 ANAPC1 P314S No medium 2.32 probably damaging 0.993 ANAPC1 P558L No low 1.575 benign 0.001 ANAPC1 Q846P Yes Buried Destabilising Strong medium 1.95 benign 0.261 ANAPC1 R1726T No low 1.69 benign 0.442 ANAPC1 R453L Yes Partially buried Destabilising Strong medium 2.36 probably damaging 0.993 ANAPC1 R871K Yes Surface Solvent exposed None neutral -0.88 benign 0 ANAPC1 Y1552C Yes Buried Destabilising Strong medium 3.41 probably damaging 0.999 ANAPC1 L1770F Yes Buried Part of interface with Apc5; end of helical repeat Mild. Similar side chain property. neutral -0.08 benign 0.003 ANAPC1 L230I No Surface On a loop of Apc1 WD40 domain N/A neutral 0.69 benign 0 ANAPC1 D568N No Surface Surface extended loop; not in sturcture N/A neutral 0.585 possibly damaging 0.455 Surface on beta jelly roll domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Gene Expression Analysis Combined with a Genomics Approach for the Identification of Signal Transduction Networks Involve
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE 41: 311-321, 2018 Global gene expression analysis combined with a genomics approach for the identification of signal transduction networks involved in postnatal mouse myocardial proliferation and development RUOXIN WANG1,2, CHAO SU3,4, XINTING WANG3,4, QIANG FU1, XINGJIE GAO3,4, Chunyan ZHANG3,4, JIE YANG2-5, XI YANG2 and MINXIN WEI1,6 1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300070, P.R. China; 2Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T5, Canada; 3Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences; 4Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology; 5Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, Research Center of Basic Medical Science, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070; 6Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shenzhen Sun Yat-sen Cardiovascular Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518001, P.R. China Received January 23, 2017; Accepted October 26, 2017 DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3234 Abstract. Mammalian cardiomyocytes may permanently lose In addition, the signal transduction pathway associated with the their ability to proliferate after birth. Therefore, studying the cell cycle was identified. The present study primarily focused on proliferation and growth arrest of cardiomyocytes during the post- genes with altered expression, including downregulated anaphase natal period may enhance the current understanding regarding promoting complex subunit 1, cell division cycle (CDC20), this molecular mechanism. The present study identified the cyclin dependent kinase 1, MYC proto-oncogene, bHLH tran- differentially expressed genes in hearts obtained from 24 h-old scription factor and CDC25C, and upregulated growth arrest mice, which contain proliferative cardiomyocytes; 7-day-old and DNA damage inducible α in 10-week group, which may mice, in which the cardiomyocytes are undergoing a prolifera- serve important roles in postnatal myocardial cell cycle arrest.
    [Show full text]
  • 1) an Arrayed Pipeline for Genetic Interaction Mapping of HIV Host-Dependency Factors 2) the HIV Ve-MAP Highlights Complexes
    A viral epistasis map (vE-MAP) reveals genetic interactions underlying HIV infection David E. Gordon1, 2, 5, Ariane Watson3, 5, Assen Roguev1,2, Gwendolyn M. Jang1, Joshua Kane1,2, Jiewei Xu1, Kathy Franks-Skiba1, Erica Stevenson1,2, Danielle Swaney1,2, Michael Shales1, Alexander Marson2,4, Gerard Cagney3, Nevan J. Krogan1,2* 1University of California San Francisco, Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2Gladstone Institutes for Virology and Immunology, San Francisco, CA, USA, 3University College Dublin, School of Medicine, Dublin, IRL, 4University of California San Francisco, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, San Francisco, CA, USA 5These authors contributed equally to this work. *Please send correspondence to [email protected] 1) An arrayed pipeline for genetic interaction 2) The HIV vE-MAP highlights complexes 4) The CNOT complex forms numerous mapping of HIV host-dependency factors and pathways impacting HIV infection negative genetic interactions in the vE-MAP 356 Knockdowns Pairwise knockdowns coupled with a luciferase reporter A B C Donor 1 Donor 2 Donor 3 Donor 4 D 200 1.2 1 2 3 AP 175 -M RNA 1.0 CNOT1 CNOT2 CNOT3 ELOC CUL2 ELOB virus facilitate high-throughput genetic interaction analysis 75 Transcription Granule RNA ESCRT HGS TSG101 CNOT1 ELOC nfectivity validated i 0.8 CNOT2 CUL2 HGS HIV E in primary he 1 CNOT3 ELOB TSG101 T-cells HIV 0.6 f t panel C of HIV host-dependency factors 50 ed o 2 z 0.4 Non-targeting CNOT1-1 CCNT1 CNOT1-1 + CCNT1 li CCNT1 CDC73 CTR9 PAF1 SUPT5H RTF1
    [Show full text]
  • APC/C Dysfunction Limits Excessive Cancer Chromosomal Instability
    Published OnlineFirst January 9, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0645 RESEARCH ARTICLE APC/C Dysfunction Limits Excessive Cancer Chromosomal Instability Laurent Sansregret1, James O. Patterson1, Sally Dewhurst1, Carlos López-García1, André Koch2, Nicholas McGranahan1,3, William Chong Hang Chao1, David J. Barry1, Andrew Rowan1, Rachael Instrell1, Stuart Horswell1, Michael Way1, Michael Howell1, Martin R. Singleton1, René H. Medema2, Paul Nurse1, Mark Petronczki1,4, and Charles Swanton1,3 Downloaded from cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2017 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst January 9, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0645 ABSTRACT Intercellular heterogeneity, exacerbated by chromosomal instability (CIN), fosters tumor heterogeneity and drug resistance. However, extreme CIN correlates with improved cancer outcome, suggesting that karyotypic diversity required to adapt to selection pressures might be balanced in tumors against the risk of excessive instability. Here, we used a functional genomics screen, genome editing, and pharmacologic approaches to identify CIN-survival factors in diploid cells. We find partial anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) dysfunction lengthens mitosis, suppresses pharmacologically induced chromosome segregation errors, and reduces naturally occurring lagging chromosomes in cancer cell lines or following tetraploidization. APC/C impairment caused adaptation to MPS1 inhibitors, revealing a likely resistance mechanism to therapies targeting the spindle assembly checkpoint. Finally, CRISPR-mediated introduction of cancer somatic mutations in the APC/C subunit cancer driver gene CDC27 reduces chromosome segregation errors, whereas reversal of an APC/C subu- nit nonsense mutation increases CIN. Subtle variations in mitotic duration, determined by APC/C activity, influence the extent of CIN, allowing cancer cells to dynamically optimize fitness during tumor evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Supplementary Information
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION doi:10.1038/nature13679 Supplemental Section S1 – Genome sequencing and assembly ........................................ 4 1.1 Genome sequencing ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Genome assembly (Nleu1.0) ............................................................................................ 4 1.3 Creation of chromosomal “A Golden Path” (AGP) files ............................................... 5 1.4 Assembly quality assessment based on single-copy genes ....................................... 6 1.5 Comparison of gibbon BAC sequences to the gibbon assembly ................................ 8 1.6 Comparison to finished BACs to assess substitution and indel error rates ............ 12 1.7 Assessing large-scale rearrangements in the gibbon genome ................................. 13 Supplemental Section S2 – Next-generation sequencing datasets ................................... 15 2.1 The diversity panel: whole-genome sequences .......................................................... 15 2.2 Exome sequencing ......................................................................................................... 16 2.3 RNA sequencing ............................................................................................................. 16 Supplemental Section S3 – Analysis of gibbon duplications ............................................ 19 3.1 Segmental duplications in Nleu1.0 / nomLeu1 ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of GNA12‑Driven Gene Signatures and Key Signaling Networks in Ovarian Cancer
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS 22: 719, 2021 Identification ofGNA12‑ driven gene signatures and key signaling networks in ovarian cancer JI‑HEE HA1,2*, MURALIDHARAN JAYARAMAN1,2*, MINGDA YAN1*, PADMAJA DHANASEKARAN1, CIRO ISIDORO3, YONG‑SANG SONG4 and DANNY N. DHANASEKARAN1,2 1Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; 2Department of Cell Biology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma, OK 73104, USA; 3Laboratory of Molecular Pathology and NanoBioImaging, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, I‑17‑28100 Novara, Italy; 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 151‑921, Republic of Korea Received April 20, 2021; Accepted July 16, 2021 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2021.12980 Abstract. With the focus on defining the oncogenic which GNA12 drove ovarian cancer progression by upregu‑ network stimulated by lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) in lating a pro‑tumorigenic network with AKT1, VEGFA, TGFB ovarian cancer, the present study sought to interrogate 1, BCL2L1, STAT3, insulin‑like growth factor 1 and growth the oncotranscriptome regulated by the LPA‑mediated hormone releasing hormone as critical hub and/or bottleneck signaling pathway. LPA, LPA‑receptor (LPAR) and nodes. Moreover, GNA12 downregulated a growth‑suppressive LPAR‑activated G protein 12 α‑subunit, encoded by G protein network involving proteasome 20S subunit (PSM) β6, PSM subunit α 12 (GNA12), all serve an important role in ovarian α6, PSM ATPase 5, ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 E1, cancer progression. While the general signaling mecha‑ PSM non‑ATPase 10, NDUFA4 mitochondrial complex‑asso‑ nism regulated by LPA/LPAR/GNA12 has previously been ciated, NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit B8 and characterized, the global transcriptomic network regulated anaphase promoting complex subunit 1 as hub or bottle‑ by GNA12 in ovarian cancer pathophysiology remains largely neck nodes.
    [Show full text]