Runaway Train Imperils CSX Track Crew

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Runaway Train Imperils CSX Track Crew BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION Of The International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Volume 116 ■ Number 4 www.bmwe.org July/August 2007 Rail Conference Leaders Form Mexico Rail Study Group embers of the IBT Rail MConference Mexico Rail Study Group met in Laredo, Texas, July 31 through August 2, 2007. The study group consists of Union Officers from the BMWED and BLET. Among the group’s goals is to protect rail workers from the negative effects flowing from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and to promote work opportunities which may result from increased rail traffic from Mexico. The group chose Laredo, Texas for its first meeting because of its geographical proximity to one of the gateways for traffic between the U.S. and Mexico at Nuevo Laredo, UP and Mexican locomotives coupled in Laredo, TX rail yard. Mexico. The North American Free Trade while being utilized in Mexico. And, at Government amended its constitution private companies. One of those rail Agreement became effective January the time, the rail industry in Mexico allowing for the privatization of the rail systems was sold to Mexican Railway 1, 1994. However, American Railroads was owned and operated by the industry. By 1999 Mexico had split up Transportation (TFM), a group which were initially reluctant to take advan- Mexican Government. the government railroad, Ferrocarriles included Mexican Maritime tage of the Agreement because of In 1995, apparently spurred on for Nacionales de Mexico (FNM) and had Transportation (TMM) and Kansas the lack of protection for their rail cars economic reasons, the Mexican sold seven separate rail systems to See Rail on Page 7 Runaway Train Imperils CSX Track Crew Quick Reactions by BMWED Members Avert Disaster onday morning July 23 began as Lashomb that runaway cars were and the prompt and orderly evacuation BMWED members of gang 6XC6 Ma typical day for CSX Curve Patch heading in their direction. The by the crew was remarkable. Their averted disaster and prevented horrific Gang No. 6XC6 working in Watertown, Roadway Worker In-Charge of the professionalism, safety consciousness, injuries and loss of human life.” NY. The 45-man curve patch and rail crew, Foreman B. Kacenski, immedi- and situational awareness prevented Rick Inclima, BMWED Director of laying crew established their Exclusive ately ordered his workers to vacate this incident from becoming a real Safety echoed Brother Long’s senti- Track Occupancy authority, conducted their machines and clear the track. At tragedy. The quick reaction by See Runaway on Page 7 their on-track safety briefing, and occu- 9:02 A.M., the runaway cars slammed pied the main track with men and into the maintenance machines left on equipment to begin replacing continu- the track and the propane exploded ous welded rail. upon impact. Unbeknown to the rail laying crew, Roads within a half mile of the derail- several cars located at nearby Fort ment were closed and residents and Drum military complex got away from businesses near the accident site were the loading dock at the base and evacuated. The collision and derail- began their high speed runaway ment caused extensive damage to the towards the rail gang. Two of the run- track and the vacated on-track mainte- away cars were carrying containers nance machines. However, due to the marked “explosives” and at least one emergency warning from Foreman car was carrying propane. According Lashomb, the quick reaction of to a report by the Post-Standard, the Roadway Worker In-Charge Kacenski, runaway cars traveled approximately and the immediate and orderly evacua- eight miles unmanned and unattended, tion by the track crew, injury and cata- building to speeds of 40-45 MPH. strophic loss of life was avoided. Minutes before the runaway cars Ed Long, Assistant General reached the location of the rail gang, Chairman of the BMWED Consolidated the work crew received a frantic warn- Rail System Federation said, “The ing over the radio from MW Foreman L. quick reaction of the foreman in-charge Track equipment destroyed by runaway train in NY. ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Meridian and Bigbee Employees Join BMWED he maintenance of way employ- birthplace of the Brotherhood of National Division and the Allied Chairman Andrew Shelton. “Welcome Tees on the Meridian & Bigbee Maintenance of Way Employes. The Eastern Federation were on hand to to the BMWED.” Railroad (M&B) recently voted for rep- BMWE was formed in Demopolis in listen to concerns, discuss pending The Meridian & Bigbee Railroad resentation by the Brotherhood of 1887 as a benevolent society which negotiations and welcome the new operates over 180 miles between Maintenance of Way Employes later became the Order of Railroad members. “I look forward to attending Meridian, MS and Montgomery, AL Division. The BMWED Organizing Trackmen and eventually, the your union meetings and addressing and is owned by Genesee & Wyoming Department had been meeting with Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way any issues that might arise,” said Vice Inc. the M&B employees over a number of Employes. It was there, on a hot months prior to the successful vote. “I summer day in 1887, that founder commend our new members for stay- John T. Wilson called together a group ing focused and achieving their goal of fellow Track Foremen to discuss of becoming union members,” said their plight of low wages, dangerous Amtrak Crew Goes BMWED Director of Organizing Tim work and their family’s economic inse- McCall. curity. The new members on the Meridian History repeated itself on June 16, Seven Years Injury Free & Bigbee will be represented by the 2007 when, like their predecessors, Allied Eastern Federation. “We look the newly organized M&B employees ighteen BMWED track depart- VanDerMaelen. “Our crew has forward to the business of obtaining a met in Demopolis to discuss ways to Ement members headquartered gone seven years without injury, fair contract for our members at M&B,” improve their working conditions and at the MOW base in New Haven, and over 8 years without a contract! said General Chairman Dennis to identify issues of concern to be CT were recognized in July for I don’t blame the local managers Albers. “We have served notice on addressed in their first union contract. achieving a full seven years of for this, but someone up high in M&B for improvements in those areas “I was a member of the BMWE for 20 injury free service to Amtrak. A the Amtrak food chain needs to get identified by our members and are years before my road was sold,” said breakfast for the gang was hosted real and settle this contract. We eager to begin negotiations.” Track Foreman Jesse Holland. “The by local management to commem- work very hard to keep these The Meridian & Bigbee member’s most important issues to me would be orate this safety milestone and to tracks safe, and we live in one of first meeting was held in Demopolis, improving wages and vacation acknowledge the crew’s commit- the highest cost of living regions in AL, a place well known for being the allowance.” Representatives from the ment to safety. the northeast. We deserve to be All are members of BMWED fairly compensated.” Local Lodge 1718, Northeastern Joe Mattie is Vice General BMWE Division System Federation. The vast Chairman of the Northeastern majority of these members have System Federation and a Track 30+ years of service, having hired Foreman for Amtrak with 34 years JOURNAL CONTENTS on with Amtrak or transferred from of railroad service. “I think we the predecessor Penn Central have made significant gains in July/Aug. 2007 ■ BMWE DIVISION JOURNAL ■ VOLUME 116 ■ NUMBER 4 Railroad when Amtrak took over safety over the years and our The BMWED Journal is the official news publication of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division ownership of the Northeast record proves it,” said Mattie. of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Corridor (NEC) in 1976. “This has been a joint effort by Freddie N. Simpson Perry K. Geller, Sr. E. Randall Brassell The NEC basically splits at New everyone involved and I am proud President and Editor Secretary-Treasurer Associate Editor Haven, with trains on the Shoreline to be part of it. We try to watch out The BMWED Journal (ISSN 1049-3921 /USPS 067640) is published bi-monthly-6 times annually at 20300 Civic route traveling east and west and for one another and put our own Center Drive, Suite 320, Southfield, Michigan 48076-4169. Periodicals postage paid at Southfield, Michigan and safety, and the safety of Amtrak additional mailing offices. trains on the inland Hartford- ATTENTION POSTMASTER: Springfield Line running north and passengers, at the very top of our Send address changes to BMWED, 20300 Civic Center Drive, Suite 320, Southfield, Michigan 48076-4169. south through the center of agenda each and every day. We Subscription Price: U.S. and Canada—$20.00 (U.S.) per year, in advance. Connecticut. The 62-mile long are maintaining the fastest track in Hartford-Springfield line services the country, but our pay rates are www.bmwe.org the state capitals of both among the lowest in the land. Connecticut and Massachusetts. My crew steps up to the plate with Rail Conference Leaders Form Hazardous Materials Training The members headquartered at skill and dedication every single Mexico Rail Study Group 1 has Come A Long Way 3 New Haven work on both lines, day. It’s really past time for the Runaway Train Imperils Two RRs Partner with NLC for keeping Amtrak’s high-speed Acela corporate big-wigs at Amtrak to CSX Track Crew 1 “Craft-Specific” HazMat Training trains moving safely along the step up to the plate and negotiate Quick Reactions by BMWED President’s Perspective 4 Shoreline’s FRA Class 6 & 7 track the kind of agreement these men Members Avert Disaster between New Haven and Boston, deserve.” Message from Teamsters and maintaining Amtrak’s FRA President Simpson said, “The Meridian and Bigbee General President Jim Hoffa 4 Class 4 track between New Haven New Haven crew is typical of MW Employees Join BMWED 2 Future Staff Positions at and Springfield on the inland route.
Recommended publications
  • Amtrak's Rights and Relationships with Host Railroads
    Amtrak’s Rights and Relationships with Host Railroads September 21, 2017 Jim Blair –Director Host Railroads Today’s Amtrak System 2| Amtrak Amtrak’s Services • Northeast Corridor (NEC) • 457 miles • Washington‐New York‐Boston Northeast Corridor • 11.9 million riders in FY16 • Long Distance (LD) services • 15 routes • Up to 2,438 miles in length Long • 4.65 million riders in FY16 Distance • State‐supported trains • 29 routes • 19 partner states • Up to 750 miles in length State- • 14.7 million riders in FY16 supported3| Amtrak Amtrak’s Host Railroads Amtrak Route System Track Ownership Excluding Terminal Railroads VANCOUVER SEATTLE Spokane ! MONTREAL PORTLAND ST. PAUL / MINNEAPOLIS Operated ! St. Albans by VIA Rail NECR MDOT TORONTO VTR Rutland ! Port Huron Niagara Falls ! Brunswick Grand Rapids ! ! ! Pan Am MILWAUKEE ! Pontiac Hoffmans Metra Albany ! BOSTON ! CHICAGO ! Springfield Conrail Metro- ! CLEVELAND MBTA SALT LAKE CITY North PITTSBURGH ! ! NEW YORK ! INDIANAPOLIS Harrisburg ! KANSAS CITY ! PHILADELPHIA DENVER ! ! BALTIMORE SACRAMENTO Charlottesville WASHINGTON ST. LOUIS ! Richmond OAKLAND ! Petersburg ! Buckingham ! Newport News Norfolk NMRX Branch ! Oklahoma City ! Bakersfield ! MEMPHIS SCRRA ALBUQUERQUE ! ! LOS ANGELES ATLANTA SCRRA / BNSF / SDN DALLAS ! FT. WORTH SAN DIEGO HOUSTON ! JACKSONVILLE ! NEW ORLEANS SAN ANTONIO Railroads TAMPA! Amtrak (incl. Leased) Norfolk Southern FDOT ! MIAMI Union Pacific Canadian Pacific BNSF Canadian National CSXT Other Railroads 4| Amtrak Amtrak’s Host Railroads ! MONTREAL Amtrak NEC Route System
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Bryn Mawr, 1683-1900
    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Bryn Mawr College Publications, Special Books, pamphlets, catalogues, and scrapbooks Collections, Digitized Books 1962 The History of Bryn Mawr, 1683-1900 Barbara Alyce Farrow Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.brynmawr.edu/bmc_books Part of the Liberal Studies Commons, and the Women's History Commons No evidence was found that the copyright was renewed in the 28th year from the date of publication, as required for books published between 1923 and 1963 (see Library of Congress Copyright Office, How To Investigate the Copyright Status of a Work [Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, Copyright Office, 2004]). The book is therefore believed to be in the public domain. Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Custom Citation Farrow, Barbara Alyce. The History of Bryn Mawr, 1683-1900. Bryn Mawr, PA: Committee of Residents and Bryn Mawr Civic Association, 1962. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/bmc_books/14 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The HISTORY OF BRYN MAWR 1683-1900 Barbara Alyce Farrow THE HISTORY OF BRYN MAWR 1683 - 1900 Barbara Alyce Farrow Foreword by Catherine Drinker Bowen Pub lished by A Committee of Residents and The Bryn Mawr Civic Association Bryn M.:lw r, Pe nn sylvania 1962 This work is based on a thesis submitted in 1957 to Westminster College New Wilmington, Pennsylvania. Copyright © Barbara Alyce Farrow 1962 library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 62-13436 II To my grandmother, Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Autobiography of Andrew Carnegie
    1 Autobiography of Andrew Carnegie CHAPTER I CHAPTER I CHAPTER II CHAPTER II CHAPTER III CHAPTER III CHAPTER IV CHAPTER IV CHAPTER V CHAPTER V CHAPTER VI CHAPTER VI CHAPTER VII CHAPTER VII CHAPTER VIII CHAPTER VIII CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX CHAPTER X 2 CHAPTER X CHAPTER XI CHAPTER XI CHAPTER XII CHAPTER XII CHAPTER XIII CHAPTER XIII CHAPTER XIV CHAPTER XIV CHAPTER XV CHAPTER XV CHAPTER XVI CHAPTER XVI CHAPTER XVII CHAPTER XVII CHAPTER XVIII CHAPTER XVIII CHAPTER XIX CHAPTER XIX CHAPTER XX CHAPTER XX CHAPTER XXI CHAPTER XXI CHAPTER XXII CHAPTER XXII CHAPTER XXIII CHAPTER XXIII CHAPTER XXIV CHAPTER XXIV CHAPTER XXV CHAPTER XXV CHAPTER XXVI CHAPTER XXVI CHAPTER XXVII CHAPTER XXVII CHAPTER XXVIII Autobiography of Andrew Carnegie 3 CHAPTER XXVIII CHAPTER XXIX CHAPTER XXIX Autobiography of Andrew Carnegie Project Gutenberg's Autobiography of Andrew Carnegie, by Andrew Carnegie This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Autobiography of Andrew Carnegie Author: Andrew Carnegie Editor: John C. Van Dyke Release Date: March 13, 2006 [EBook #17976] Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF ANDREW CARNEGIE *** Produced by Jonathan Ingram, Linda Cantoni, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF Autobiography of Andrew Carnegie 4 ANDREW CARNEGIE WITH ILLUSTRATIONS [Illustration: [signature] Andrew Carnegie] London CONSTABLE & CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the 2018 – 2022 Corporate Plan and 2018 Operating and Capital Budgets
    p SUMMARY OF THE 2018 – 2022 CORPORATE PLAN AND 2018 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS SUMMARY OF THE 2018-2022 CORPORATE PLAN / 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 5 MANDATE ...................................................................................................................................... 14 CORPORATE MISSION, OBJECTIVES, PROFILE AND GOVERNANCE ................................................... 14 2.1 Corporate Objectives and Profile ............................................................................................ 14 2.2 Governance and Accountability .............................................................................................. 14 2.2.1 Board of Directors .......................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2 Travel Policy Guidelines and Reporting ........................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Audit Regime .................................................................................................................. 17 2.2.4 Office of the Auditor General: Special Examination Results ............................................. 17 2.2.5 Canada Transportation Act Review ................................................................................. 18 2.3 Overview of VIA Rail’s Business .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • Pa-Railroad-Shops-Works.Pdf
    [)-/ a special history study pennsylvania railroad shops and works altoona, pennsylvania f;/~: ltmen~on IndvJ·h·;4 I lferifa5e fJr4Je~i Pl.EASE RETURNTO: TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER DENVER SERVICE CE~TER NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ~ CROFIL -·::1 a special history study pennsylvania railroad shops and works altoona, pennsylvania by John C. Paige may 1989 AMERICA'S INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE PROJECT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR I NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ~ CONTENTS Acknowledgements v Chapter 1 : History of the Altoona Railroad Shops 1. The Allegheny Mountains Prior to the Coming of the Pennsylvania Railroad 1 2. The Creation and Coming of the Pennsylvania Railroad 3 3. The Selection of the Townsite of Altoona 4 4. The First Pennsylvania Railroad Shops 5 5. The Development of the Altoona Railroad Shops Prior to the Civil War 7 6. The Impact of the Civil War on the Altoona Railroad Shops 9 7. The Altoona Railroad Shops After the Civil War 12 8. The Construction of the Juniata Shops 18 9. The Early 1900s and the Railroad Shops Expansion 22 1O. The Railroad Shops During and After World War I 24 11. The Impact of the Great Depression on the Railroad Shops 28 12. The Railroad Shops During World War II 33 13. Changes After World War II 35 14. The Elimination of the Older Railroad Shop Buildings in the 1960s and After 37 Chapter 2: The Products of the Altoona Railroad Shops 41 1. Railroad Cars and Iron Products from 1850 Until 1952 41 2. Locomotives from the 1860s Until the 1980s 52 3. Specialty Items 65 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6-B: Chronology of Amtrak Service in Wisconsin
    Appendix 6-B: Chronology of Amtrak Service in Wisconsin May 1971: As part of its inaugural system, Amtrak operates five daily round trips in the Chicago- Milwaukee corridor over the Milwaukee Road main line. Four of these round trips are trains running exclusively between Chicago’s Union Station and Milwaukee’s Station, with an intermediate stop in Glenview, IL. The fifth round trip is the Chicago-Milwaukee segment of Amtrak’s long-distance train to the West Coast via St. Paul, northern North Dakota (e.g. Minot), northern Montana (e.g. Glacier National Park) and Spokane. Amtrak Route Train Name(s) Train Frequency Intermediate Station Stops Serving Wisconsin (Round Trips) Chicago-Milwaukee Unnamed 4 daily Glenview Chicago-Seattle Empire Builder 1 daily Glenview, Milwaukee, Columbus, Portage, Wisconsin Dells, Tomah, La Crosse, Winona, Red Wing, Minneapolis June 1971: Amtrak maintains five daily round trips in the Chicago-Milwaukee corridor and adds tri- weekly service from Chicago to Seattle via St. Paul, southern North Dakota (e.g. Bismark), southern Montana (e.g. Bozeman and Missoula) and Spokane. Amtrak Route Train Name(s) Train Frequency Intermediate Station Stops Serving Wisconsin (Round Trips) Chicago-Milwaukee Unnamed 4 daily Glenview Chicago-Seattle Empire Builder 1 daily Glenview, Milwaukee, Columbus, Portage, Wisconsin Dells, Tomah, La Crosse, Winona, Red Wing, Minneapolis Chicago-Seattle North Coast Tri-weekly Glenview, Milwaukee, Columbus, Portage, Wisconsin Hiawatha Dells, Tomah, La Crosse, Winona, Red Wing, Minneapolis 6B-1 November 1971: Daily round trip service in the Chicago-Milwaukee corridor is increased from five to seven as Amtrak adds service from Milwaukee to St.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2010/January 2011 SMART
    Volume 42/43 December 2010 / January 2011 Number 12/1 www.utuia.org www.utu.org The Official Publication of the United Transportation Union Conductor certification coming Jan. 1, 2012 WASHINGTON – In a Notice of Proposed •CSX General Chairperson (GO 049) John Rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Nov. 10 Lesniewski ; Federal Register, the Federal Railroad Admin - •UTU Training Coordinator and Local 528 istration proposes to make Jan. 1, 2012, the (Chicago) Legislative Rep. Ron Parsons ; effective date for implementation of conductor •National Legislative Director James Stem ; certification. •Alternate National Legislative Director The rulemaking on principles, elements and John Risch ; methods of conductor certification was ordered by Congress in the 2008 Rail Safety Improve - •Local 645 (LIRR, Babylon, N.Y.) Chairper - ment Act. son Vinnie Tessitore ; The NPRM – preceding publication of a final •UTU Rail Safety Coordinator for Designat - rule, expected in early 2011 (ahead of imple - ed Legal Counsel Larry Mann . mentation) – was developed through the FRA’s The UTU will respond to NPRM with recom - Rail Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC), mendations for improvement and change in the which is comprised of stakeholders, affected final rule – as will all stakeholders. The FRA will labor unions, railroads, suppliers, manufacturers make the sole determination as to contents of and FRA safety experts. the final rule. The various stakeholders had many conflict - ductor Certification Working Group by a team Following are major provisions of the rulemak - ing objectives for the rulemaking, and the appointed by UTU International President Mike ing. A detailed summary is posted at www.utu.org. NPRM is a consensus document that required Futhey: (Click on “Transportation Safety,” and then compromise among all stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • BLET Calls for Positive Train Control Following Metro-North Fatality
    Daily news updates NOVEMBER/ WWW.BLE-T.ORG ocomotive DECEMBER 2013 NGIN ee RS RAINM E N E WS LE & T N Volume 27, Issue 8 Published by the BLET, a division of the Rail Conference,• International Brotherhood of Teamsters HAPPY NEW YEAR! Delaware & Hudson locomotive 7304, displaying the classic D&H “lightning stripe” livery, lumbers through a wintry mix of sleet and snow on the night of November 30, 2008. The Victorian-era passenger station in Wesport, N.Y., was built for the D&H in 1875-1876. Photo: copyright Gary Knapp BLET calls for Positive Train Control Members urged to following Metro-North fatality call their member STATEMENT BY BLET NATIONAL PRESIDENT DENNIS R. PIERCE: of Congress after n December 1, “First and foremost, the BLET of on-the-job training working 2013, a Metro- extends our deepest sympathies as rail conductors or in other BLET lobbies for North train de- to all accident victims and their railroad crafts. They must also railed in the loved ones. It is impossible complete classroom training Bronx, N.Y., kill- for those who were not affected and numerous written and field two-person crew bill ing four people and injuring to understand the grief that now tests prior to earning promotion n November, the President & National Legis- Odozens. The Brotherhood of Lo- surrounds those who were, but it to engineer. Locomotive engi- BLET, working jointly lative Representative John comotive Engineers and Train- is paramount that the les- neers are subject to exten- with SMART-Trans- Tolman led the team of BLET men represents more than 51,000 sons from this tragedy are used sive certification requirements portation Division (for- lobbyists, which also includ- active and retired locomotive en- to prevent any such loss in the pursuant to the provisions of Imerly the United Transpor- ed: Texas State Legislative gineers and trainmen throughout future.
    [Show full text]
  • Railroad Engineering 101 Session 38
    Creating Value … … Providing Solutions Railroad Engineering 101 Session 38 Tuesday, February 19, 2013 Presented by: David Wilcock Railroad Engineering 101 . Outline . Overview of the Railroad . Track . Bridges . Signal Systems . Railroad Operations . Federal Railroad Administration . American Railway Engineering and Maintenance Association Railroad Engineering 101 . Overview of the Railroad . Classifications (Types) – Private – Common Carrier . Classifications (Function) – Line Haul – Switching – Belt Line – Terminal Railroad Engineering 101 . Overview of the Railroad . Classifications (Operating Revenues) – Class 1: $250 M or more – Class 2: $20.5 M - $249.9 M – Class 3: Less than $20 M . Classifications (Association of American Railroads Types) – Class I: $250 M or more – Regional: 350 miles or more; $40 M or more – Local – Switching and Terminal Railroad Engineering 101 . Overview of the Railroad . Class 1 Railroads – North America – BNSF – Canadian National – Canadian Pacific – CSX – Ferromex – Kansas City Southern – KCS de Mexico – Norfolk Southern – Union Pacific – Amtrak – VIA Rail Railroad Engineering 101 . Overview of the Railroad . Organization of a Railroad – Transportation » Train & Engine Crews » Dispatching » Operations – Engineering » All Right of Way Engineering – Mechanical » Equipment Maintenance – Marketing Railroad Engineering 101 . Overview of the Railroad . Equipment - Locomotives – All Units rated by Horsepower – Horsepower is converted to Tractive Effort to propel locomotive – Types: » Electric – Pantograph trolley or third rail shoe » Diesel-Electric – self contained electric power plant » Dual Mode – Can use either electric or diesel Railroad Engineering 101 . Overview of the Railroad . Equipment - Freight Cars – Boxcar – Flatcar – Gondola – Covered Hopper – Coal Hopper – Tank Car – Auto Racks – Container “Tubs or Boats” Railroad Engineering 101 . Overview of the Railroad . Resistance – Resistance is important especially for freight operations as they are dealing with heavy loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the 2017 – 2021 Corporate Plan and 2017 Operating and Capital Budgets
    SUMMARY OF THE 2017 – 2021 CORPORATE PLAN AND 2017 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS 2017-2021 SUMMARY OF THE CORPORATE PLAN / 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 5 1. MANDATE ............................................................................................................................................ 15 2. CORPORATE MISSION, OBJECTIVES, PROFILE AND GOVERNANCE ..................................................... 15 2.1 Corporate Objectives and Profile ................................................................................................ 15 2.2 Governance and Accountability .................................................................................................. 15 2.2.1 Board of Directors ............................................................................................................... 15 2.2.2 Train Services Network Changes ......................................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Travel Policy Guidelines and Reporting .............................................................................. 18 2.2.4 Audit Regime ....................................................................................................................... 18 2.2.5 Office of the Auditor General: Special Examination Results ............................................... 18 2.2.6 Canada Transportation Act Review ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elegant Report
    Pennsylvania State Transportation Advisory Committee PENNSYLVANIA STATEWIDE PASSENGER RAIL NEEDS ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE DECEMBER 2001 Pennsylvania State Transportation Advisory Committee TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................................................4 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................5 1.1 Study Background........................................................................................................................................5 1.2 Study Purpose...............................................................................................................................................5 1.3 Corridors Identified .....................................................................................................................................6 2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY ...........................................................................................................7 3.0 BACKGROUND RESEARCH ON CANDIDATE CORRIDORS .................................................14 3.1 Existing Intercity Rail Service...................................................................................................................14 3.1.1 Keystone Corridor ................................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]