Which Creative licence is right for me?

Instructions Start here! Am I ok with other people No I should use “All Rights Creative Commons (CC) is a non- copying and distributing my Reserved” to profit organisation that works to content without asking my make it easier to share, reuse, protect my content. permission everytime?

repurpose and creative ns Attribution 2.5 material. It does this by providing free licences that let creators give permission in advance for certain Yes uses of their material.

I should use an Attribution- CC encourages people to share their work. But we think it is very No Noncommercial-No Derivative important that you use the right Works licence. No Am I ok with other people licence for you, and that you Am I ok with them changing and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 understand what that licence adapting the content? Will I allow making money out of their reuse means. This flowchart is intended remixing? of the content? to help with this—by answering a I should use an Attribution- few simple questions, it lets you No Derivative Works licence. choose which CC licence is right Yes for you, or if you want to use a CC Yes licence at all. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0

Start at the green question box and, following the arrows that No I should use an Attribution- correspond with your answer, Noncommercial licence. by fuex, is available under a Creative Commons Certification, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain Do I want to limit how others can No make your way through the pink Am I ok with other people Mariana release their ? ie. If they remixing and blue commercial making money out of their reuse http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 remix, their new content must be questions until you reach a purple of the content? licence box. That will be the right available to remix on the same terms. licence for you. For the full details I should use an of each of the licences, see the link Yes Attribution licence. under the box.

Yes http://creativecommons.org/lisences/by/3.0 CC has an online tool that will take you through the similar process at http://creativecommons.org/ I should use an Attribution- by benweiner, is available under the SIL Open Font , http://scripts.sil.org/OFL. license. No Noncommercial-Share Alike licence. Puritan 2.0 Am I ok with other people For more information about http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 the CC licences, see http:// making money out of their reuse creativecommons.org/licenses. of the content? Published by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation in partnership with Commons Australia. This fact sheet is available under a Commo Australia licence, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/au. The heading font, and the copy font, I should use an Attribution- Yes Share Alike licence. Poster v1.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0 AUSTRALIA Which Creative Commons Licence is right for me? fact sheet. Permalink and source files at http://creativecommons.org.au/ factsheets/licensing-flowchart. Last revised 18 June 2009.