DOCSLIB.ORG

Archaeological Resources Assessment for the 1024 Mateo Street Project, Los Angeles, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archaeological Resources Assessment for the 1024 Mateo Street Project, Los Angeles, California Archaeological Resources Assessment for the 1024 Mateo Street Project, Los Angeles, California APRIL 2019 PREPARED FOR Mateo Arts, LLC PREPARED BY SWCA Environmental Consultants This page intentionally left blank. Archaeological Resources Assessment for the 1024 Mateo Street Project, Los Angeles, California Prepared for Mateo Arts, LLC 1875 Century Park East, Suite 1750 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Attn: Daniel A. Abrams and Sammi Shaaya Prepared by Chris Millington, M.A., RPA and Trevor Gittelhough, M.A., RPA SWCA Environmental Consultants 51 West Dayton Street Pasadena, California 91105 (626) 240-0587 www.swca.com SWCA Project No. 055465.00 SWCA CRRD Report No. 19-220 April 2019 Keywords: CEQA; archaeological sensitivity assessment; City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning; Arts District; Zanja No. 1; residential and industrial refuse and building foundations; 2018 E Bay St, 2016 E Bay St, 2010 E Bay St, 2006 E Bay St, 2006 1/2 E Bay St, 1000 S Mateo St, 1000 1/4 S Mateo St, 1010 S Mateo St, 1012 S Mateo St, 2023 E Sacramento St, 2023 1/2 E Sacramento St, 2019 E Sacramento St, 2019 1/2 E Sacramento St, 2015 E Sacramento St, 2015 1/2 E Sacramento St, 2011 E Sacramento St, 2009 E Sacramento St, 2007 E Sacramento St, 2005 E Sacramento St, 2001 E Sacramento St, 1026 S Mateo St, 1024 S Mateo St, 1020 S Mateo St, 1018 S Mateo St, 1014 S Mateo St; Los Angeles; Hollywood quadrangle; Township 1 South, Range 13 West, Section 9 Archaeological Resources Assessment for the 1024 Mateo Street Project, Los Angeles, California MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Purpose and Scope: Mateo Arts, LLC (the Applicant) retained SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) to conduct an archaeological resources sensitivity assessment in support of the proposed 1024 Mateo Street Project located in the city of Los Angeles, California, within the Arts District neighborhood. The Applicant proposes to construct a mixed-income, eight-story mixed-use development containing approximately 106 Live/Work condominiums units and approximately 119,843 square feet of commercial space that includes 13,978 square feet of retail and 13,126 square feet of restaurant space (the Project). The Project site fronts along Mateo, Bay, and Sacramento Streets, and consists of 62,111 square feet (1.43 acres) of lot area. The following report addresses archaeological resources for the purpose of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and with relevant portions of Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5024.1, Title 14 California Code of Regulations (CCR) Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, and PRC Sections 21083.2 and 21084.1. The City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning (City Planning) is the Lead Agency under CEQA for the Project. This report documents the methods and results of a confidential records search of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), sacred lands file (SLF) search through the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and archival research used to evaluate the presence or likelihood (i.e., sensitivity) of archaeological resources within the Project site and to inform the analysis of potential impacts in accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. Dates of Investigation: On March 18, 2019 SWCA conducted a confidential search of the CHRIS records at the SCCIC on the campus of California State University, Fullerton. On April XX, 2019, SWCA received the results of a SLF search from the NAHC. Summary of Findings: This evaluation included a review of historical archival sources and archaeological records. No tribal cultural resources were identified in a CHRIS records search within the project site and a 0.5-mile radius. The SLF records search did not identify any sacred lands or sites in the project site. The closest known sites with Native American-affiliated materials on file at the CHRIS are mapped in approximately 1.5 miles north of the Project site, between the Los Angeles Plaza, Union Station, and MWD Headquarters building. The Gabrielino village known as Yaanga and several other important Historic- period Gabrielino sites (e.g., Pueblito. Rancheria de los Poblanos, and two unnamed rancherias) were located in the same approximate area, more than 1 mile from the Project site. The general proximity of the Project site to areas of known habitation, the river, and broad travel corridors has the effect of an overall increase in the sensitivity for archaeological resources affiliated with Native Americans, particularly for the physical remains of temporary open camps. Subsequent development of the Project site between the 1890s and 1910s, and multiple episodes of redevelopment through the twentieth century would have displaced any former archaeological resources affiliated with Native Americans that were once present on the surface or near surface. Sediment profiles taken from soil sample locations in the Project site are typical of floodplain deposits within the Los Angeles River floodplain and reflect a mixture of high- and low-energy deposition, which is interpreted as reducing the overall archaeological sensitivity for archaeological resources affiliated with Native Americans. Overall, SWCA finds a low potential for encountering prehistoric and Historic-period Native American archaeological resources within the Project site. One segments of the historical zanja system—Zanja No. 1—was historically located approximately 250 feet (76.2 m) from the Project site, between Mateo and Wilson Streets. A second, unnamed branch of the zanja was also mapped 300 feet (91.4 m) east of the Project site. While several overview maps depicting the zanja system trace the route of Zanja No. 1 either within or very near the Project site, an 1891 survey map was able to more precisely and reliably confirm its relative location. The survey map depicts the main channel of Zanja No. 1 as being constructed of a concrete conduit in the parcels northwest of the Project site and then transitioning into a wooden flume, within the former Leck property, directly east of the Project site. The unnamed segment to the east appears to have been constructed as an open earthen ditch, and is SWCA Environmental Consultants i Archaeological Resources Assessment for the 1024 Mateo Street Project, Los Angeles, California described as an “old ditch,” possibly an earlier route of the zanja. Because the 1891 survey map was drawn to scale and depicted streets are close to their current alignments, the map can be considered a reliable source for assessing the sensitivity for any physical remains of the zanja system within the Project site, and supports the conclusion that the project site has a low sensitivity for Zanja No. 1 and any other zanja system components. The CHRIS records search and archival research identified five archaeological resources, four of which are Historic-period sites, within a 0.8-km (0.5-mile) radius of the Project site. One additional archaeological site, LAN-4460H, was also identified in the CHRIS search, although it was located outside the 0.5-mile radius. LAN-4460H is a Historic-period archaeological site identified during construction monitoring. The site contained a substantial deposit of domestic items and structural remains associated with residential development between the 1880s and 1920s. Because the historical developments of LAN-4460H so closely resemble those within the current Project site, including the existing conditions at the time of construction, the likelihood of encountering similar Historic-period archaeological resources is considered very high. Historic-period archaeological resources could be preserved below the current ground surface, especially within any sediments identified as artificial fill. Specifically, there is potential to encounter structural remains, features, and artifacts associated with the residential neighborhood from the 1890s to the mid- 1920s. Refuse was commonly deposited in trash pits and privies prior to the establishment of sewer lines and trash services. Because these types of historical features were originally excavated into pits, which can extend several feet below the surface, they are frequently found preserved below subsequent modifications. The various industrial uses of the Project site from the mid-1920s through the 1950s are also likely to occur as archaeological deposits such as pieces of refuse, hardware, tools, buildings materials, machine parts, as well as former building foundations or other structural remains. The preservation potential is reduced in at least some portions of the Project site as a result of the construction and removal of some subterranean structures in the Project site after 1970. This includes hydraulic hoists, USTs, island pumps, a grease pit, wash-down drain, and clarifier that were identified in Phase I and II ESAs, and a Site Characterization Report. Overall, SWCA finds the Project site has a high sensitivity for containing Historic-period (non- Native American) archaeological resources. Conclusion: The depth of excavation for the Project is approximately 25 feet below the surface, which would likely require excavation of underlying alluvial sediments and removal of any overlying artificial fill. The potential for unidentified archaeological resources within the Project site is found to be high. If present, any previously unidentified archaeological resources have the potential to be significant under CEQA. The total depth of excavation required for the Project is expected to be approximately 25 feet below the surface. Without mitigation, physical destruction of an archaeological resource eligible for listing in the CRHR would result in a significant impact under CEQA. To address potential impacts to previously undiscovered archaeological resources, the Project will include retaining a qualified archaeologist (MM Arch-1), producing and implementing a detailed ARMMP (MM Arch-2 and Arch-4), and conducting a worker training (MM Arch-3). Doing so will ensure any archaeological sites are identified and determined to be historical resources or unique archaeological resources, to which project-related impacts would be mitigated on the basis of their eligibility under each CRHR criterion and as a unique archaeological resource.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dark Age Church Period of Barbarian Invasions
    Scholars Crossing History of Global Missions Center for Global Ministries 2009 The Dark Age Church Period of Barbarian Invasions Don Fanning Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgm_hist Recommended Citation Fanning, Don, "The Dark Age Church Period of Barbarian Invasions" (2009). History of Global Missions. 3. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgm_hist/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Global Ministries at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in History of Global Missions by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Middle Ages 500-1000 1 3 The Dark Age Church Period of Barbarian Invasions AD 500—1000 Introduction With the endorsement of the Emperor and obligatory church membership for all Roman citizens across the empire, Roman Christianity continued to change the nature of the Church, in stead of visa versa. The humble beginnings were soon forgotten in the luxurious halls and civil power of the highest courts and assemblies of the known world. Who needs spiritual power when you can have civil power? The transition from being the persecuted to the persecutor, from the powerless to the powerful with Imperial and divine authority brought with it the inevitable seeds of corruption. Some say that Christianity won the known world in the first five centuries, but a closer look may reveal that the world had won Christianity as well, and that, in much less time. The year 476 usually marks the end of the Christian Roman Empire in the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1024 Mateo Street Project, Los Angeles, California
    Tribal Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1024 Mateo Street Project, Los Angeles, California MAY 2019 PREPARED FOR Mateo Arts, LLC PREPARED BY SWCA Environmental Consultants This page intentionally left blank. Tribal Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1024 Mateo Street Project, Los Angeles, California Prepared for Mateo Arts, LLC 1875 Century Park East, Suite 1750 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Attn: Daniel A. Abrams and Sammi Shaaya Prepared by Chris Millington, M.A., RPA and Trevor Gittelhough, M.A., RPA SWCA Environmental Consultants 51 West Dayton Street Pasadena, California 91105 (626) 240-0587 www.swca.com SWCA Project No. 055465.00 SWCA CRRD Report No. 19-224 May 2019 Keywords: CEQA; tribal cultural sensitivity assessment; City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning; Arts District; 2018 E Bay St, 2016 E Bay St, 2010 E Bay St, 2006 E Bay St, 2006 1/2 E Bay St, 1000 S Mateo St, 1000 1/4 S Mateo St, 1010 S Mateo St, 1012 S Mateo St, 2023 E Sacramento St, 2023 1/2 E Sacramento St, 2019 E Sacramento St, 2019 1/2 E Sacramento St, 2015 E Sacramento St, 2015 1/2 E Sacramento St, 2011 E Sacramento St, 2009 E Sacramento St, 2007 E Sacramento St, 2005 E Sacramento St, 2001 E Sacramento St, 1026 S Mateo St, 1024 S Mateo St, 1020 S Mateo St, 1018 S Mateo St, 1014 S Mateo St; Los Angeles; Hollywood quadrangle; Township 1 South, Range 13 West, Section 9 Tribal Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1024 Mateo Street Project, Los Angeles, California MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Purpose and Scope: Mateo Arts, LLC (the Applicant) retained SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) to conduct a tribal cultural resources sensitivity assessment in support of the proposed 1024 Mateo Street Project located in the city of Los Angeles, California, within the Arts District neighborhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources November 2019 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTORS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Related Contexts and Evaluation Considerations 1 Other Sources for Military Historic Contexts 3 MILITARY INSTITUTIONS AND ACTIVITIES HISTORIC CONTEXT 3 Historical Overview 3 Los Angeles: Mexican Era Settlement to the Civil War 3 Los Angeles Harbor and Coastal Defense Fortifications 4 The Defense Industry in Los Angeles: From World War I to the Cold War 5 World War II and Japanese Forced Removal and Incarceration 8 Recruitment Stations and Military/Veterans Support Services 16 Hollywood: 1930s to the Cold War Era 18 ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS FOR AIR RAID SIRENS 20 ATTACHMENT A: FALLOUT SHELTER LOCATIONS IN LOS ANGELES 1 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities PREFACE These “Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities” (Guidelines) were developed based on several factors. First, the majority of the themes and property types significant in military history in Los Angeles are covered under other contexts and themes of the citywide historic context statement as indicated in the “Introduction” below. Second, many of the city’s military resources are already designated City Historic-Cultural Monuments and/or are listed in the National Register.1 Finally, with the exception of air raid sirens, a small number of military-related resources were identified as part of SurveyLA and, as such, did not merit development of full narrative themes and eligibility standards.
    [Show full text]
  • METROPOLITAN ASPECTS Detail of Mural in Federal
    Page METROPOLITAN ASPECTS Between 10 and 11 Detail of Mural in Federal Build- Los Angeles Stock Exchange ing and Post Office "Dick" Whittington Mural by Edward Biberman Lotus Pool in Echo Park Section of Fine Arts, Treas- Frank L. Rollins ury Department Duckpond, Westlake Park Seventh Street Fred William Carter Fred William Carter Residential District Airview of Downtown Los An- Burton 0.Burt geles, looking South Lafayette Park and the First Con- Los Angeles County Develop- gregational Church ment Committee Fred William Carter Main Street First Sketch of Los Angeles Fred William Carter (1852), from Fort Moore Hill City Hall Security First National Bank Fred William Carter Sixth and Spring Streets (1904) Security First National Bank ARCHITECTURE Between 72 and 73 Los Angeles County General Hos- V. D. L. Research House, Los pital Angeles Viktor von Pribosic Home of Richard J. Neutra, Los Angeles Public Library Architect Bertram Goodhue, Architect Luckhaus Studio Burton 0.Burt Federal Building and Post Office, Mudd Memorial Hall of Philoso- Los Angeles phy, University of Southern G. Stanley Underwood, Archi- California tect Universitv-. of Southern Cali- F. E. Dunham: U. S. Forest f ornia Service McAlmon Residence, Los Angeles Columbia Broadcasting System R. M. Schindler. Architect Studios, Hollywood Julius ~hulman William Lescaze, Architect "Blue and Silver House," the resi- Columbia Broadcasting Sys- dence of Jobyna Howland- tem Beverly Hills Edison Building, Los Angeles Lloyd Wright, Architect Allison and Allison, Architects Julius Shulman Edison Company A Palm Springs Residence Honnold and Russell, Architects Thomas & Kitchel ix X ILLUSTRATIONS Page ARCHITECTURE-continued Between 72 and 73 A Sierra Madre Residence of Bat- An Altadena Residence (Mon- ten Construction terey Style) H.
    [Show full text]
  • Buddhism and Written Law: Dhammasattha Manuscripts and Texts in Premodern Burma
    BUDDHISM AND WRITTEN LAW: DHAMMASATTHA MANUSCRIPTS AND TEXTS IN PREMODERN BURMA A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Dietrich Christian Lammerts May 2010 2010 Dietrich Christian Lammerts BUDDHISM AND WRITTEN LAW: DHAMMASATTHA MANUSCRIPTS AND TEXTS IN PREMODERN BURMA Dietrich Christian Lammerts, Ph.D. Cornell University 2010 This dissertation examines the regional and local histories of dhammasattha, the preeminent Pali, bilingual, and vernacular genre of Buddhist legal literature transmitted in premodern Burma and Southeast Asia. It provides the first critical analysis of the dating, content, form, and function of surviving dhammasattha texts based on a careful study of hitherto unexamined Burmese and Pali manuscripts. It underscores the importance for Buddhist and Southeast Asian Studies of paying careful attention to complex manuscript traditions, multilingual post- and para- canonical literatures, commentarial strategies, and the regional South-Southeast Asian literary, historical, and religious context of the development of local legal and textual practices. Part One traces the genesis of dhammasattha during the first and early second millennia C.E. through inscriptions and literary texts from India, Cambodia, Campå, Java, Lakå, and Burma and investigates its historical and legal-theoretical relationships with the Sanskrit Bråhmaˆical dharmaßåstra tradition and Pali Buddhist literature. It argues that during this period aspects of this genre of written law, akin to other disciplines such as alchemy or medicine, functioned in both Buddhist and Bråhmaˆical contexts, and that this ecumenical legal culture persisted in certain areas such as Burma and Java well into the early modern period.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Moore, Los Angeles, CA Mexican–American War
    1 Fort Moore, Los Angeles, CA Mexican–American War On August 13, 1846, early in the conflict, U.S. naval forces under Commodore Robert F. Stockton arrived at Los Angeles and raised the American flag without opposition. A small occupying force of 50 Marines, under Captain Archibald H. Gillespie, built a rudimentary barricade on what was then known as Fort Hill overlooking the small town. Siege of Los Angeles The harsh martial law of Captain Gillespie soon ignited a popular uprising among Californios and Mexicans led by General José María Flores beginning on September 22, 1846. Known as the Siege of Los Angeles, Californios assembled a force to retake Los Angeles. Gillespie's fifty marines were able to resist an initial attack on the government house in town and regrouped on Fort Hill, where they strengthened the fortification with sandbags and mounted their cannon. As time passed, the Californio forces opposing the U.S. takeover grew to just over 600 men, with several Californio citizens voicing opposition. General Flores offered an ultimatum: leave within 24 hours or face attack. Gillespie agreed to withdraw from Los Angeles, under safe passage, on September 30, 1846. On October 7, the U.S. forces regrouped, with Commodore Stockton sending 350 Americans, including 200 U.S. Marines, under U.S. Navy Capt. William Mervine, to retake Los Angeles. The marines were defeated in their attempt at the Battle of Dominguez Rancho, as Stockton's fleet fled south to San Diego. In December, U.S. Army forces under Captain Stephen W. Kearny were defeated by the Californio Lancers at the Battle of San Pasqual.
    [Show full text]
  • DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY August 2010
    PARK 101 DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY august 2010 PARK 101 DISTRICT Freeway Cap Feasibility Study QUOTES FROM PARK 101: EDAW|AECOM LOS ANGELES INTERN PROGRAM 2008 BOOK This is a project of the City of Los Angeles with funding provided by the Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) Compass Blueprint Demonstration Project Program. Compass Blueprint assists Southern California cities and other organizations in evaluating planning options and stimulating development consistent with the region’s goals. The preparation of this report was funded in part through grants from the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT)—Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, in accordance with the Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f) of Title 23 of the U.S. Code. Additional assistance was provided by the State of California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency through a California Regional Blueprint Planning Grant. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of SCAG, USDOT or the State of California. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. SCAG shall not be responsible for the City’s future use or adaptation of the report. PARK 101 DISTRICT Freeway Cap Feasibility Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2-1 INTRODUCTION 2-2 Meeting the Goals of Southern California Association of Governments and Compass
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Area Connections
    metro.net Union Station Area Connections 1 Destinations Lines Stops Scale One Unit: /4 Mile Chinese Historical Lincoln/Cypress Station Society Chinatown Alhambra 76, 78, 79, 378, 485 B CL 5 8 7 BE Heritage and Altadena via Lake 485 7 A 1 Metro Local Stop RN Visitors Center Arcadia 78, 79, 378 B C AR T Metro Local and D S Artesia Transit Center n Metro Silver Line n J 1 S A RapidL Stop Y T G Baldwin Park Metro Silver Line n to 190 N Å K A W I ST I Chung King Chinese R E Beverly Hills Metro Purple Line o to 20, 720; 704 5 Metro Rapid Line UM Bamboo R Los Angeles S N I Cultural P EY T D Road Art Plaza State S W S Bob Hope Airport (BUR) ÅÍ 94, 794, Metrolink Å, Amtrak Í W 2 N A BA T C Center D Galleries HU M N Metro Silver Line Stop S NG B Historical 110 D K o E I O A U Boyle Heights Metro Gold Line , 30, 68, 770 B R N CP T G C O G T L A N T S I N Park N A Mandarin K G 5 7 I N Broadway 30, 40, 42, 730, 740, 745 A O N FIN G L E IN L N N Metro Silver Line G W N B U Y Plaza P R H E Burbank Å 94, 96, 794 W 2 O C I E E Paci>c L L N C Y D T T E Cal Poly Pomona Metro Silver Line n to 190, 194 K Metro Rail StationT A S M E JU L S W Alliance N Y U G J R Y I W F N and Entrance G L n S W W Y Carson Metro Silver Line to 246 J Medical Y N G U R B O N E T M A I R O L N P A N I 5 6 O E T Center U L Y Century City 704, 728, CE534 E 3 O W R E D S D S M L A E E W I T Metro Red LineA C M U S E IN O O W G A N Y U S City Terrace 70, 71 E B C I P L V O F LE L T n N M Covina Å Metro Silver Line to 190 K Metro Purple Line G L IN E A S Crenshaw District 40, 42, 740
    [Show full text]
  • African American History of Los Angeles
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Context: African American History of Los Angeles Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources NOVEMBER 2017 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Context: African American History of Los Angeles Certified Local Government Grant Disclaimers The activity that is the subJect of this historic context statement has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of Interior, through the California Office of Historic Preservation. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 as amended, the Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination based on race, color, national origin, disability, or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity National Park Service 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington
    [Show full text]
  • GC 1002 Del Valle Family Papers
    GC 1002 Del Valle Family Papers Repository: Seaver Center for Western History Research, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Span Dates: 1789 – 1929, undated, bulk is 1830 – 1900 Extent: Boxes: 13 legal, 2 ov, 1 mc drawer Language: English and Spanish Abstract: Papers relating to Antonio Seferino del Valle, his son Ygnacio, grandson Reginaldo F., and other family members. Activities include their cattle ranching and wine businesses, particularly in Rancho San Francisco and Rancho Camulos, located in today’s Ventura County, California. Other papers include the political activities of Ygnacio and Reginaldo F. Conditions Governing Use: Permission to publish, quote or reproduce must be secured from the repository and the copyright holder Conditions Governing Access: Research is by appointment only Preferred Citation: Del Valle Family Papers, Seaver Center for Western History Research, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History Related Holdings: P-14 Del Valle [Photograph] Collection, 1870s – 1900 GC 1001 Antonio F. Coronel (1817 – 1894) Papers P-157 Antonio Franco Coronel (1817 – 1894) Collection, ca. 1850 – 1900 Seaver Center for Western History Research GC 1002 The History Department’s Material Culture Collection Scope and Content: Correspondence, business papers, legal papers, personal and family papers, memoranda, military documents, and material relating to Antonio Seferino del Valle (1788-1841), who came to California in the Spanish army in 1819; of his son Ygnacio, (1808-80), born in Jalisco, Mexico, who engaged in the cattle and wine businesses and held at various local and state offices in California; of his grandson, Reginaldo Francisco (1854-1938), who was also active in state politics; Ysabel Varela del Valle (Reginaldo’s mother); and other family members.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Indigenizing Spaces: How Mapping Racial Violence Shows the Interconnections Between
    “Re-Indigenizing Spaces: How Mapping Racial Violence Shows the Interconnections Between Settler Colonialism and Gentrification” By Jocelyn Lopez Senior Honors Thesis for the Ethnic Studies Department College of Letters and Sciences Of the University of California, Berkeley Thesis Advisor: Professor Beth Piatote Spring 2020 Lopez, 2 Introduction Where does one begin when searching for the beginning of the city of Inglewood? Siri, where does the history of Inglewood, CA begin? Siri takes me straight to the City History section of the City of Inglewood’s website page. Their website states that Inglewood’s history begins in the Adobe Centinela, the proclaimed “first home” of the Rancho Aguaje de la Centinela which housed Ignacio Machado, the Spanish owner of the rancho who was deeded the adobe in 1844. Before Ignacio, it is said that the Adobe Centinela served as a headquarters for Spanish soldiers who’d protect the cattle and springs. But from whom? Bandits or squatters are usually the go to answers. If you read further into the City History section, Inglewood only recognizes its Spanish and Mexican past. But where is the Indigenous Tongva-Gabrielino history of Inglewood? I have lived in Inglewood all of my life. I was born at Centinela Hospital Medical Center on Hardy Street in 1997. My entire K-12 education came from schools under the Inglewood Unified School District. While I attend UC Berkeley, my family still lives in Inglewood in the same house we’ve lived in for the last 23 years. Growing up in Inglewood, in a low income, immigrant family I witnessed things in my neighborhood that not everyone gets to see.
    [Show full text]
  • Bachelor of Science in Business Administration Degree
    BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION DEGREE Students earning degrees through the College of Business Administration are required to complete: 60 credit hours of non-business coursework 30 hours of core business coursework (see II below) 18 hours of business electives at the junior/senior level (see III below) 12 hours of business or non-business approved electives 120 credits I. Required non-business coursework includes the campus general education requirements. Students must complete a 42-hour block of courses from an approved list of general education courses. These courses are from eight areas: CORE: 1) First Year Writing – 1 course (ENGL 1100, 1110 or HIST 1111 with a C- or better grade) 2) Math Proficiency – 1 course (MATH 1030 or a proctored ALEKS score of 51 or higher) 3) Communication Proficiency – 1 course (COMM 1030, 1040, 2230, 2240, or TH DAN 1210) 4) Information Literacy – 1 course (CMP SCI 1012, INF SYS 1800, 2800, Math 1105) 5) American History or Government – 1 course (CRIMIN 1100, HIST 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, POL SCI 1100) EXPLORE 6) Humanities and Fine Arts – 9 hours from at least two areas (see approved list in Advising Office) 7) Social Sciences – 9 hours from at least two areas (BUS AD 2900, ECON 1001, 1002) 8) Math and Life/Natural Sciences – 9 hours from at least two areas (MATH 1100, 1105 and a Life/Natural Science) Additional requirements of the College of Business include: . One Cultural Diversity course . Two Global Awareness courses (see approved list) . ENGL 3120 Business Writing . BUS AD 1000 or completion of a Social Science course .
    [Show full text]