DOCSLIB.ORG

Part L: Germany's Defeat World War I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Part L: Germany's Defeat World War I Part l: Germany's Defeat tn World War I uing $e6sr ddde of th.206 mtuy,c+ c.M/r 600,000 Jtu r€pd€d 1 'bout My ffi the fare.t Bbwhs indE6'riz.d Fd or ih. ?op,rador Ho{t€,rhg pFni@ F6on in EuoF_ Ge@n det prcduction - rh4 .f ,em nrbdl4atEiddsmdstu@de vrsededEndsinele indrabr otindeirrizatid lhd.vnibLnidi9,nda@bg4ot|gd, - hld iu.t d.Ed.r a* of Bi64 rhe b'dllPl:a ol @t Frahd hdd l.@ kbm a ed€€nnne dE Intuldial R@olud@ By 1919ca@ny pbdued @d6t bbh.d Ia@ olcgDh P.l1ri6 tEly u'E rirc @ .Et {an.tid Bribin. R.pid CerM .d@ wa3 epdialrt ricb dd rh€ devetopdd L' dE.IEnr6l nd deicl indarlB Gltln p€oPl€ @ ju.dy Pprd of 6dr olldire pd G6rny b dE foEftDnt.f what @ €tLd r€ lsibse MuidaB$&4 B..h ad Be.hl)qHir -sdid Induibl Revoludn. tn addtd@ rhe c:F dtuchacethea'dsch r,ddd'rl6op16.!dr nh popula6@ which rrl@&d lron {! hillion tl s xd aid Heget h.d md. {Eh nEt mt onlJ' o; $71 b mE rhd 6s nilion in 1911, @ sowinS G.dlq d:rb4 tdr d.n oI €uope 6e th,n dut of rh. orhe eior EwPen Po@ Mdt ol IIE l€0 nrdsrm dds M rh& aoubr€d O.m.n '. poltldl .y.t !,, dsi4dungthi! peid4a dlliN ofc@pee Th. adhPlidhadb of die c-tmd P&Pt€ 6Lft tlE out'€id. Byl9ll,trlErIDn|rl p.en w.E€p€.i.lyElEr, cn|uAtotth.ta*rhlr .r th. bel G@ian lator loe w.rr€d h hdlls. c.llhy.Ild tut edata aou6rudl 1a/r. UlJ*e b dE tud:rds or dE l@camn &ibn!Fl:@ddRGia-ofri6*erwftui si..y^dRlns w6 *all+duad ad lbnosltl@ Con- fied F&i6xy attl* 6d of dE Mddre &6 - tlp pulory.dedd ff .hildrq 6u rhe !s6 ofan( b Gm l,rl5 66a€d rIE nodfr lte divid.d up bdan Pdid€d all [email protected] witn ba6ic Ednl& dozd or b6r n!6 ln rll. 136&, ono 'bong rn wi|ine,edmlli3bU*flr.i0i!{a.tsbhC@y Biq.di tlr. p.nre Dinbte ot dE lgt p@elfd re b@ ln66rrof rtuoBrilin MlE -nie c.@ stib, Ihsi{ .nbr*ed .n . enp.jSn to Ped of G6@B we ctutrd.s-vior62p€td oabau,nbdcaery.Toadd*ln3selqB!trr* idqutr ngd@Edv6sEnbhbend3Tpffi ts led ?rusi, b qthory in 9e ag.iGr Dglluk, rhe Au&ifl Enl4,!d Fe Atbr cel!6 !.jriado& Bismrcl @k€d to *i:t and dl@l deb3e. Many of Empe-s n6t $€$den rhe Powd of rne dde and h indd* ndcal novemd i pdtidc ud dhid tuir ongiE C€Dan /s inft@ abmd. sbbirig a orderweF nighry vatued in 8Gm,r*,s cljffiy, Apeialty 6 FoluEonary pdrihEt mve'luts a foo$old 8'ined THE RoaD ro SARAJE\,o h ma.y Eftp€d @unbi€. Bimaftk bok a eG pbnsd .pproa.h b @u@ring rhe Fblurionria. A!,trE 20th century h€3&, cemhy had one on dle one hm4 rhe lny and rhe polre @re sivd inPlacbleqemy rd€. c.lrrh uin@dm rmk bed powa b.mtut.ivir u@51wMe&e gftm- plae onry aftd rh€ prsie any idti.rd a hudr- nd'cticbdtfury66dhbtrdoE6'heolna atugdder o. rhe FFtdr h $e rn hand,BLhjrcradoptedrtlolrubinpbveondi: or 13m. & a Eutt, Frre wa rdrd b 6 ove. drc 6otu ror workds rhat pur het ordhary c.rnans Fovinm oI abe Td Lornine b G€rnmy dd b ar4d oJ drer oukrpab in Bdhii bd Fm€. pay Gffiy s brlion iir6. e h nud of EftP€. cruy ha+.i3iddals cemy's sowins3ftlsrhad nndm nisd *lulqr€ No naft! how su(atur, fcw cs@c outd&abovetheddclasift6wnichtheywert w€ll rn 1907, they joired the Frrncn in fotus tle hn. The c.rtlE rridrgr.eduq4imlFE4whi.h Tripre Entcnre b .oun&' cemm peer. csmany w6vdyddvq69e$iw,ddng(rugtinf@ed t:d prcvoha Brihin by dbn!!d. ih*aivi'ioB Momve. dE ofiier6rpd of fiec6 pb8lam ro build up ib Mvr whle cene l.adeB mndxhyedbpFsitiofuiglvclllllEtwde algftd tur a lff8e nd wae n@s$ry to pFrRt tn i ffid 6i nhb€B ol dr€ uppd cra$. oD69/3 wqldwide dlMacial iikab ad d&- c€@yt npid hdEriati,?rion pas lrur€d,haiN 6bd6. the Bnr:sh sw the c€ifrd buitd np ae in cill'h Kie9. & dE num!€r of indusdial work a fr6r to theii ld\g4brdin€ doiiEne at sa e6 8Ew, s did tne #ngih of the s{ial Lren@atic Par9orc€@ny (sPD), ttu kadinswqr.ine .ra$ A Cetmen nanina srrtenary n*t be ac pdrr. c€l!m/3 prriddr. dE Rej.nsb& w* i- kitulznA?d tobe inmprnde @iA1 ds dbtm cE6ingry bm by kcion b.ke4 rhe upper clas, 6J rh. B;.ish EaPn , ad @ if thtt EftPne dnlpp.nrcd, the ulioh oI tle Sztt.st mititary p.rei md de KrrjnE cr6. l.i.n.nyl uik the rt n'u| pwt it de 3ylhelide6ism.klefioftreinr3$,hen,d aftdt stete wra @flN tteu d tt @nbiru hr tta hord€d . sbk tnat was efiicicnr bnt reeisrad ro tidd$e ofsr.h an inflbus Idit spintl. ctu3r. wnib ax aduu hid llm tne risht io rcb in -sdkr olFciol of the Bndrh Fofli'n ofre narl']s of lne k rer (a dld lnat o -oes!") le htle or ad hr ninide6. voiins dErrery€ dEir courys pdidons dr Iuldt lead- .r the resional l€vel €nsured rhnt 'eshfuions ihc ins *Pdr!. Tn€y Emkd cehan effda b celffi nobirity -d walthy indsbialisb h.rd thc 6h6lish dipro@ric and coDder&r foorhotds in hg6r shaE af inn!re. nle gbups oppced m- Africa rhe Midtlle risr, md dhs .@ or Bdtish in- id.hds6 in rhe lolidel6Fbadd rmined loJ,aj l]ugw. M@*ftile/ REie otriciair feared th* rhe gwth of c@n nitib'y power ua prt oi a plm C€trltry wa3 in tlny i6p€cb ude€atiq b srab enibr 6!n ure Rusim EnpiE Ttuy als. bur rhe soveffienr did not ah4pi io .ohptebly idt dur rhe hign bnfis camrmy inF3ed.n R6sn tupoutdisfrL A@GidrabledegEothhrebd md dric freedoa wE pcmitr.d. c,lrlny at the Fcd wifi tneh66le Po@ ce.nh rades M or se aruy wE ihe Ene or hrdse polirior, hc@insry believed rhi drr ]{n Mound€d. rn !€pore. they se.gthcncd then allane wirh the STALEMATE AT TI'E BATTLEFRONT AsteHunS.rir Empne horielly, rhis atliance brcushtcelru'bbdffuG'ontwndutnay Inthefusrmdn6ollh?wa,c€I]rwylaun.hed G.run lead6 h:d long $ught b avoid. a (a$ive olfetuive agaict Frece dEr almo* ep Erd Patu hsephmbd, hlraBs, Flgrhmd Bniish roFe h"xed rheadvre oI ihe G.lrrm rny. By tlu on June 23, 1e1,1, s€rb nadonarbb Essiturd ddly dnm D.$sid6 adopd bch snriaE, e! Hunsatu dudn4 E s.EFvo. rhe alssimdon er ding inio hishry roruhed pddoc $it wee dilfi.dr b aik.k the drydopftnr aI rtu m.hhe gu fd r wilh i\e suppon of rheircm allis, rne Aaba healy duery gave defeme rh€ advahge over oI- gdvemmenr cued an uld@tun demndinS rhat rer. Ddn€ t€ n*t tou }€G, dntoc or srdieF died in Fdeir barde rhat stftly.haig.d drb.r porid.rr dvi9. TIE Aubim dtuM prdpkd a suestul.In he Au38i 1914 dE c.tu.ePul*d Arsd d€d:red wd asatur serbb i ld€ Jdy 1e14 RNian red6 orded tneirafry b be€in Fepring rhe lol1owing nonths. |rr.y t@k rhe ofre$i'e md .d- for wa! G€rrro GaaeF weE suddany ontrcnbd !tredde€Pne6el4iblyofdeRu$nEqP!F 3yMdch1912mjlibyqback,ndi@6ighG' celru niibry sbar€gy drl€d ror ceffiy b ery ar hone tolcd R@bt nnd, Ts Ni.rol6 Il, b atuck swiltly ad deisivelt as had b€a $e .e i ,EP don! Ei+t ttl4dB rad, a o.mGr s.vm d'e Fm.Prussia Wa, b pEvenr b€ing squ*d nent unde. rhe l6der+ip or v.L r?hjn *ized powa RKia. Acor.ting ro the ed b.ga biling pls ro pdr Rsia ari or rhe ffi- or the lxlm, Bnbin g{ ib uval sP{ionty kndkout blo* isajBr Fa€ 6y n.in8 iluoush B€l gi@ tudbu& rd dE NedEbn& b ou6,'*the m{y ws cut ofl frcn its colod6, a wen a fbh Fmch amy md €pM Pdd G€trlhy wotld thd be abre b .onenhe ib em€is o 1d of ihe bldkade weF rcEEd by pdr had6b in 1916 and le1z plus an mcually cold winrc! in rd rhe s.]'li€fiq plh b su@€d, dr cetu ould noi ano* the rKim amy b gd a head sd citi6 who mul'l nd alford dr bla.k mrkd pne ior in pRparilg lor wd cmequ{rly, fie Gelmn gov- food ud tuel, weF pushed b eE b e@cn|oldercdi6nilibrybmbirizcaidd.claEd More tlu! ,@,!co cffi civirid di€d dtrg h. wd agaiGr tu*ia on Au8!* 1. Two days lat.r, wd62elllofiJleblcradeMe cernanydedared sai dn Fran e, Ru66iatally. cellrhadian profpEd the Bn6sh b.ldlne ffi.n cmmy on Augur 4. wodd wd I had begun. unlike Eftgeh onllicb ol rlE 13rh dd 19th which the shggle ffi .d limid b the bard€Iield ship oI ihe sPD in rhe RenhsbS supponed fte wa Each side bied b dipple rhe orhel3 glrmny d h- cffod byvoting b pftvide s€ hilibrywi$addiuoml deroine norate dn the hone tunL Even neltal rund! c€rl]E work6, ld\g ssFed or dftloyalty counbis, su.h 6 *r u.ibt sbb, foud rhi their by top govemnent officials, pabioliaily rarlied abilib/ b bde Gely wisr Ewpewas h dhgd.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kurt Von Schleicher the Soldier and Politics in the Run-Up to National Socialism: a Case Study of Civil-Military Relations
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2013-06 Kurt von Schleicher the soldier and politics in the run-up to national socialism: a case study of civil-military relations Bitter, Alexander B. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/34631 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS KURT VON SCHLEICHER—THE SOLDIER AND POLITICS IN THE RUN-UP TO NATIONAL SOCIALISM: A CASE STUDY OF CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS by Alexander B. Bitter June 2013 Thesis Co-Advisors: Donald Abenheim Carolyn Halladay Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704–0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202–4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704–0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2013 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS KURT VON SCHLEICHER—THE SOLDIER AND POLITICS IN THE RUN-UP TO NATIONAL SOCIALISM: A CASE STUDY OF CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Center Party and the League of Nations: International Relations in a Moral Dimension
    InSight: RIVIER ACADEMIC JOURNAL, VOLUME 4, NUMBER 2, FALL 2008 THE GERMAN CENTER PARTY AND THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN A MORAL DIMENSION Martin Menke, Ph.D.* Associate Professor, Department of History, Law, and Political Science, Rivier College During the past two decades, scholarly interest in German political Catholicism, specifically in the history of the German Center Party has revived.1 As a spate of recent publication such as Stathis Kalyvas’s The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe and the collection of essays, Political Catholicism in Europe, 1918-1965, 2 show, this renewed interest in German political Catholicism is part of a larger trend. All of these works, however, show how much work remains to be done in this field. While most research on German political Catholicism has focused on the period before 1918, the German Center Party’s history during the Weimar period remains incompletely explored. One of the least understood areas of Center Party history is its influence on the Weimar government’s foreign policy. After all, the Center led nine of the republic’s twenty cabinets. Karsten Ruppert, for example, relies almost exclusively on Peter Krüger’s Die Außenpolitik der Republik von Weimar,3 which emphasizes the role of Foreign Minister Gustav Stresemann almost to the exclusion of all other domestic decision-makers. Weimar’s foreign policy largely consisted of a series of responses to crises caused by political and economic demands made by the victors of the First World War. These responses in turn were determined by the imperatives of German domestic politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in the Weimar Republic the Elections to the Constituent National
    HISTORICAL EXHIBITION PRESENTED BY THE GERMAN BUNDESTAG ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Elections in the Weimar Republic The elections to the constituent National Assembly on 19 January 1919 were the first free and democratic national elections after the fall of the monarchy. For the first time, women had the right to vote and to stand for election. The MSPD and the Centre Party, together with the German Democratic Party, which belonged to the Liberal Left, won an absolute majority of seats in the Reichstag; these three parties formed the government known as the Weimar Coalition under the chancellorship of Philipp Scheidemann of the SPD. The left-wing Socialist USPD, on the other hand, which had campaigned for sweeping collectivisation measures and radical economic changes, derived no benefit from the unrest that had persisted since the start of the November revolution and was well beaten by the MSPD and the other mainstream parties. On 6 June 1920, the first Reichstag of the Weimar democracy was elected. The governing Weimar Coalition suffered heavy losses at the polls, losing 124 seats and thus its parliamentary majority, and had to surrender the reins of government. The slightly weakened Centre Party, whose vote was down by 2.3 percentage points, the decimated German Democratic Party, whose vote slumped by 10.3 percentage points, and the rejuvenated German People’s Party (DVP) of the Liberal Right, whose share of the vote increased by 9.5 percentage points, formed a minority government under the Centrist Konstantin Fehrenbach, a government tolerated by the severely weakened MSPD, which had seen its electoral support plummet by 16.2 percentage points.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernd Braun, Die Weimarer Reichskanzler. Zwölf Lebensläufe in Bildern (Photodokumente Zur Geschichte Des Parlamentarismus Und Der Politischen Parteien, Bd
    Bernd Braun, Die Weimarer Reichskanzler. Zwölf Lebensläufe in Bildern (Photodokumente zur Geschichte des Parlamentarismus und der politischen Parteien, Bd. 7), Droste Verlag, Düsseldorf 2011, 502 S., kart., 59,80 €. Die zwölf Politiker, die in den 14 Jahren der Weimarer Republik das Amt des Reichskanzlers bekleidet haben, sind im kollektiven Gedächtnis der Deutschen kaum mehr präsent; in der deutschen Erinne- rungskultur spielen sie – vielleicht abgesehen von Gustav Stresemann und Heinrich Brüning – so gut wie keine Rolle. Diesem Vergessen entgegenzuwirken, ist die erklärte Absicht von Bernd Braun. Der von ihm herausgegebene Bildband verdankt sich der Kooperation zwischen der „Stiftung Reichspräsi- dent-Friedrich-Ebert-Gedenkstätte“ und der „Kommission für Geschichte des Parlamentarismus und der politischen Parteien“. In deren Auftrag hat Braun in jahrelangen Recherchen in über 100 Herkunft- sorten im In- und Ausland Bildmaterial aufgespürt, darunter nicht wenige Fotos, die bisher unbekannt waren. Aus dem gesammelten Material hat er dann 800 Fotoaufnahmen ausgewählt und zu zwölf klug komponierten „Lebensläufen in Bildern“ zusammengestellt. Jedem der zwölf Reichskanzler sind 50 Seiten mit zwischen 54 und 64 Abbildungen gewidmet und jede der Bildbiografien wird durch eine drei Seiten umfassende prägnante Kurzbiografie als „Einstiegshilfe“ in den Bildteil eingeleitet. Die Quellenlage für einen Bildband über die Reichskanzler ist nach Brauns Befund äußerst mager. Das hat zwei Gründe. Zum einen lag es am damaligen technischen Stand der Fotografie: Es gab noch kein funktionierendes Teleobjektiv und man benötigte lange Belichtungszeiten, sodass manche Fotos von schlechter Qualität sind. Vor allem aber mangelte es den meisten Reichskanzlern am richtigen Gespür für Public Relations; Pressekonferenzen waren selten, von einem halben Dutzend Reichsregierungen ist kein Kabinettsfoto überliefert.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosing Nazism: US Perceptions of National Socialism, 1920-1933
    DIAGNOSING NAZISM: U.S. PERCEPTIONS OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM, 1920-1933 A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Robin L. Bowden August 2009 Dissertation written by Robin L. Bowden B.A., Kent State University, 1996 M.A., Kent State University, 1998 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2009 Approved by Mary Ann Heiss , Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Clarence E. Wunderlin, Jr. , Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Kenneth R. Calkins , Steven W. Hook , James A. Tyner , Accepted by Kenneth J. Bindas , Chair, Department of History John R. D. Stalvey , Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………..………………………………………………iv Chapter 1. Introduction: U.S. Officials Underestimate Hitler and the Nazis……..1 2. Routine Monitoring: U.S. Officials Discover the Nazis…………......10 3. Early Dismissal: U.S. Officials Reject the Possibility of a Recovery for the Nazis…………………………………………….....57 4. Diluted Coverage: U.S. Officials Neglect the Nazis………………..106 5. Lingering Confusion: U.S. Officials Struggle to Reassess the Nazis…………………………………………………………….151 6. Forced Reevaluation: Nazi Success Leads U.S. Officials to Reconsider the Party……………………………………………......198 7. Taken by Surprise: U.S. Officials Unprepared for the Success of the Nazis……………………...……………………………….…256 8. Conclusion: Evaluating U.S. Reporting on the Nazis…………..…..309 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………318 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation represents the culmination of years of work, during which the support of many has been necessary. In particular, I would like to thank two graduate school friends who stood with me every step of the way even as they finished and moved on to academic positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Jehl 01 2019-1
    table of contents Christian Neschwara: „Zum immerwährenden Gedenken an die Ausrufung des Freistaates“: Das Selbstbild der (deutsch-)österreichischen Republik 1918/19 und seine Verdrängung . 2. Martin Paar: Zur Geschichte des österreichischen Weinrechts von 1907 bis 1985 . 15. Thomas Gergen: Entscheidungsfindung auf kommunaler Ebene vor 80 Jahren – Mobilmachung 1939 im Landkreis Saarlouis . 26. Malte Wilke, Stefan Segerling: Politisierte Beleidigungsprozesse in der Weimarer Republik . 31. Martin Löhnig: Die norwegische Verfassung von 1814 in der deutschen Verfassungspublizistik des 19 . Jahrhunderts . 40. Javier Belda Iniesta, Michela Coretti: The Clementines Dispendiosam and Saepe Contingit and the Evolution of the Medieval Summary Procedure . 46. Dmitry Poldnikov: Two Divergent Approaches to Comparative Legal Studies in Europe and Their Implications for Legal History . 68. Bartosz Kamil Truszkowski: Registration of Civil Status in the Second Polish Republic (1918 – 1939) . 76. Karol Siemaszko: Criminals and Criminality on the so–called Recovered Territories (Poland) after the End of WW II (1945 – 1950) in the Light of Judicature of the Selected Polish Regional Courts . 85. József Szalma: Die Kodifikationsentwicklung des Zivilrechts in Serbien – insbesondere über den Vorentwurf des Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuches und über das neue Handelsgesetzbuch der Republik Serbien . 90. th st Editorial staff Pavel Salák: The Dating of Last Wills in the Territory of the Czech Lands from the 19 to the 21 Century . 98. JOURNAL ON EUROPEAN HISTORY OF LAW: Pál Sáry: The Ancient Roman Pollicitatio and a Similar Hungarian Legal Institution . 107 Prof. Dr. Christian Baldus Kinga Beliznai Bódi: Judicial Robe . The Insignia of the Judicial Profession . 112 Faculty of Law, Heidelberg University, Germany Jenő Szmodis: Some Newer Views to the Problems of the Hungarian Holy Crown and Holy Crown-Doctrine .
    [Show full text]
  • By Volker Vlnnai a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty
    Ernst Junger, victim or creator of a "Zeitgeist" Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Vinnai, Volker, 1939- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 22:31:19 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/319819 -EBMST JUNGERs VICTIM OB CREATOR OF A "ZEITGEIST* by Volker Vlnnai A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the -DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY v In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS I n .the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA STATEMENT BY THE AUTHOR This theis has been submitted in partial fulfill­ ment of the requirements for an advanced degree at The Unlvesity of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under the rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknow­ ledgement of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in their judgement the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from
    [Show full text]
  • A European Culture War in the Twentieth Century? Antic-Catholicism and Anti-Bolshevism Between Moscow, Berlin, and the Vatican 1922 to 1933 Weir, T
    A European Culture War in the Twentieth Century? Antic-Catholicism and Anti-Bolshevism between Moscow, Berlin, and the Vatican 1922 to 1933 Weir, T. (2015). A European Culture War in the Twentieth Century? Antic-Catholicism and Anti-Bolshevism between Moscow, Berlin, and the Vatican 1922 to 1933. Journal of Religious History, 39(2), 280-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9809.12185 Published in: Journal of Religious History Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2014 Religious History Association This is the accepted version of the following article: Weir, T. H. (2014), A European Culture War in the Twentieth Century? Anti-Catholicism and Anti-Bolshevism between Moscow, Berlin, and the Vatican 1922 to 1933. Journal of Religious History. doi: 10.1111/1467-9809.12185, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9809.12185/abstract. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The German Center Party and the Reichsbanner
    THOMAS A. KNAPP THE GERMAN CENTER PARTY AND THE REICHSBANNER A CASE STUDY IN POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CONSENSUS IN THE WEIMAR REPUBLIC The problem of paramilitary organizations in Germany after 1918 forms an interesting and crucial chapter in the story of the ill-fated Weimar Republic. The organizations which gained the most notoriety stood on the far political right, unreconciled and unreconcilable both to military defeat and to the republic which was the child of that defeat. But the republic did have its militant defenders, who were recruited on the democratic left and organized in the Reichsbanner.1 The history of the Reichsbanner not only vividly demonstrated "the sharpness of political antagonisms"2 in the republic, but also reflected several developments during Germany's so-called golden years after 1924: the balance of political forces, Catholic-socialist and bourgeois- socialist relations, and in no small degree the disintegration of the Weimar Coalition (Social Democratic Party, Democratic Party, and Center Party). It is felt that the relationship between the Reichsbanner and the Center party can be treated as one important test case of political and social stability in Germany during the 1920's. Apart from the size and relative electoral stability of the Center, and the potential contribution it could make to the Reichsbanner, this question had some far-reaching ramifications. At least three interconnected problems were brought into play, namely, unresolved social tensions inherited from pre-war Germany, the Center's attitude towards the republic, and the role of that party's republican left wing and its most outspoken representative, Joseph Wirth.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Center Party and the Reichsbanner
    THOMAS A. KNAPP THE GERMAN CENTER PARTY AND THE REICHSBANNER A CASE STUDY IN POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CONSENSUS IN THE WEIMAR REPUBLIC The problem of paramilitary organizations in Germany after 1918 forms an interesting and crucial chapter in the story of the ill-fated Weimar Republic. The organizations which gained the most notoriety stood on the far political right, unreconciled and unreconcilable both to military defeat and to the republic which was the child of that defeat. But the republic did have its militant defenders, who were recruited on the democratic left and organized in the Reichsbanner.1 The history of the Reichsbanner not only vividly demonstrated "the sharpness of political antagonisms"2 in the republic, but also reflected several developments during Germany's so-called golden years after 1924: the balance of political forces, Catholic-socialist and bourgeois- socialist relations, and in no small degree the disintegration of the Weimar Coalition (Social Democratic Party, Democratic Party, and Center Party). It is felt that the relationship between the Reichsbanner and the Center party can be treated as one important test case of political and social stability in Germany during the 1920's. Apart from the size and relative electoral stability of the Center, and the potential contribution it could make to the Reichsbanner, this question had some far-reaching ramifications. At least three interconnected problems were brought into play, namely, unresolved social tensions inherited from pre-war Germany, the Center's attitude towards the republic, and the role of that party's republican left wing and its most outspoken representative, Joseph Wirth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Family Vincius – Berlin Page: 1 / 366
    The Family Vincius – Berlin Page: 1 / 366 René Jean-Paul Dewil The Family Vincius Copyright © René Dewil Number of words: 196853 January 2020 – October 2020 The Family Vincius – Berlin Page: 2 / 366 Berlin 1880- 1930 Copyright © René Dewil Number of words: 196853 January 2020 – October 2020 The Family Vincius – Berlin Page: 3 / 366 Copyright Clause Copyright © René Jean-Paul Dewil 2020 René Jean-Paul Dewil is identified as the sole author of this work. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be altered without the written permission of the author. The book may be copied in electronic or other forms for personal use only. It may not be printed, introduced in any retrieval system, electronic or otherwise, photocopied or otherwise recorded without the prior written permission of the author. The only system where the e-book may be retrieved from is the Internet website www.theartofpainting.be, which holds the only and original text acknowledged by the author. This publication remains under copyright. ‘The Family Vincius - Berlin’ is a work of fiction. Therefore, all the names and the figures of the novel, except for the historical figures of the rulers and military leaders, are purely the product of the author’s imagination. Any resemblance to actual persons living or dead, or to places of interest, is completely coincidental. The characters and events are totally fictional. The places, events and incidents are the product of the author’s imagination or used fictitiously. Copyright © René Dewil Number of words: 196853 January 2020 – October 2020 The Family Vincius – Berlin Page: 4 / 366 Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prologue: Weimar Society in Retrospect
    1 Prologue: Weimar Society in Retrospect GUNTER W. REMMLING The social system of Heimar Germany has always been controversial. From the start 1leimar society was c;laracterized by a peculiar fluidity: between 1913 and 1933, the German Reich, commonly referred to as the \Veimar Republic, v1as a virtual laboratory of sociocultural experimentation. In the streets of German ·towns and cities, political armies competed for followers--a orocess punctuated by assassinations and advertised by street battles embroiling monarchists, imperial militarists, nihilistic war veterans, Communists, Socialists, anarchists, and National Socialists. Parliamentary activity involved about twenty-five political parties whose shifting alliances produced twenty governmental cabinets with an average lifespan of less than nine months. The political circus performed in an economic crazy house: the hungry post\var years skidded into an inflationary period during which the German mark--valued before the war at 4.2 per dollar--plummeted to the value of 4.2 billioa to the dollar. At this point, in November 1923, individuals paid a billion marks to send a letter abroad and the German Republic verged on complete financial bankruptcy and political disintegration. An era of political and econouic reconstruction began in 1924; by 1929 Germany had become the leading industrial power on the European continent. The Great DeDression, announced by the crash of the New York Stock Sxchange in October 1929, brought the ~eimar Republic to the brink of disaster: by the end of 1932, nearly half of the German labor force was unemployed. Hany jobless men provoked arrest, seeking shelter and food in prison, others swelled the ranks of the Red Front and, ominously, those of l!itler's Storm Troops.
    [Show full text]