DOCSLIB.ORG

Whole Day Download the Hansard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Tuesday Volume 618 13 December 2016 No. 80 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 13 December 2016 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2016 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 597 13 DECEMBER 2016 598 Jesse Norman: As I have said, it is premature to give House of Commons any kind of assurance. What is striking, though, is the amount of new investment that has been taking place in Tuesday 13 December 2016 this country,irrespective, one might think, of any concerns about Brexit. That includes investments in BAE Systems, Nissan, Jaguar Land Rover, Honda, Associated British The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Ports and many other large industrial players. PRAYERS Mr Steve Baker (Wycombe) (Con): Will my hon. Friend explore how World Trade Organisation-compliant tariff drawback mechanisms and inward processing [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] measures can ensure that the objectives of my hon. Friend the Member for Rossendale and Darwen (Jake Berry) are met? Oral Answers to Questions Jesse Norman: That is a formidably technically sophisticated question, for which I thank my hon. Friend. I think that it probably lies to be answered between BUSINESS, ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL ourselves and the Department for International Trade. STRATEGY We will certainly consider it carefully. Mr Speaker: There are some very clever people in The Secretary of State was asked— Wycombe, you know. Leaving the EU: Tariffs Kate Green (Stretford and Urmston) (Lab): Food 1. Jake Berry (Rossendale and Darwen) (Con): What production and food processing is an important part of steps the Government are taking to protect industries the north-west economy that is not necessarily susceptible based in (a) East Lancashire and (b) the UK from the to export beyond the European Union because of different potential effect of tariffs after the UK leaves the EU. consumer tastes and preferences in the rest of the [907816] world. What negotiations are the Government considering or already undertaking to protect this important industry? The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business, Can the Minister confirm that specialist negotiators Energy and Industrial Strategy (Jesse Norman): My who understand the industry are in place to carry out Department is working closely with the Department for those negotiations? Exiting the EU to understand the impacts that leaving the EU will have on businesses, consumers and other Jesse Norman: That question is really as much for the economic actors across the UK, including in east Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Lancashire. As the Prime Minister has said, we will as it is for us. Nevertheless, it is true that tastes are work hard to get the best deal for Britain. expanding around the world, and therefore one sees every opportunity for British food producers to expand Jake Berry: Although not quite as eye-catching as the their world markets in the days to come. motor industry,the construction products,furniture-making and chemical industries, represented by Crown Paints, Philip Davies (Shipley) (Con): Given that we have a J & J Ormerod and others in my constituency, employ massive trade deficit with the European Union, surely it more people. Will my hon. Friend ensure that these would be economic suicide for the EU not to agree a strategic industries to east Lancashire can trade on no free trade deal with us. However, Civitas has calculated less favourable terms than any other industry following that if it did go down that line, British business would Brexit? have to pay about £5 billion a year in tariffs under WTO rules to access the EU market, and EU businesses Jesse Norman: As my hon. Friend will know, I am would have to pay about £13 billion in tariffs to access closely involved with the construction products sector, the UK market. Given that, could we not agree to cover and the construction industry in general, through the all tariffs for British businesses exporting to the EU, Construction Leadership Council. It would be premature so that they do not have to pay anything, and still be to comment on any deal to be struck, but he can take it quids in? from me that it has my closest attention, as does the future of the construction industry itself. Jesse Norman: Alas, long experience has taught me to Graham Jones (Hyndburn) (Lab): As a fellow MP for distrust some of these speculative estimates of cost and Rossendale, I echo the comments and concerns about benefit, so I will not comment on that. leaving the EU and what the tariff framework would be if there was a hard Brexit. When I visited Simon Jersey, Danny Kinahan (South Antrim) (UUP): We are all which did the formal wear for our Olympic team, I was aware that the cross-border trade between Ireland and told that the cliff-edge tariffs on textiles are between Northern Ireland is absolutely vital, and if tariffs are 9% and 12%. This is a real concern. What assurances put in place, it could be a complete disaster. Can we can the Government give to companies that they will please make sure that the Northern Ireland voice is not be taxed out of business through leaving the EU? heard and embedded in any negotiations? 599 Oral Answers 13 DECEMBER 2016 Oral Answers 600 Jesse Norman: I assure the hon. Gentleman that that support it as new fourth industrial revolution businesses question is being taken extremely seriously in my come forward to seek new funding to develop the next Department. Northern Ireland is an area for which I generation of science and technology businesses? have a ministerial responsibility. I have met, on several occasions, Northern Ireland Economy Ministers and Joseph Johnson: Yes, I am happy to provide that senior figures in industry there. We will continue to look assurance. Innovate UK, our innovation agency, will be at this question very closely. at the heart of our industrial strategy, and the autumn statement will provide it with the resources it needs to Science and Innovation continue to do its job of supporting small businesses in innovation. 2. Adam Afriyie (Windsor) (Con): What steps his Department is taking to promote science and innovation. Liz Saville Roberts (Dwyfor Meirionnydd) (PC): Tidal [907817] Lagoon Power’s report, “Ours to own”, anticipates that tidal lagoons could bring more than £70 billion to the The Minister for Universities, Science, Research and UK industry.Swansea Bay tidal lagoon is key to unlocking Innovation (Joseph Johnson): This Government are strongly that innovative potential, which has great opportunities committed to science and innovation. We protected the for Cardiff and the north Wales coast, as well. I appreciate science budget at the spending review in 2015. In the that the Minister will have concerns about costs to last autumn statement, a few days ago, we committed to customers, but will he commit to weighing up all aspects spending a further £2 billion a year by the end of this of the energy trilemma in his response to the Hendry Parliament. The creation of UK Research and Innovation, report? through the passage of the Higher Education and Research Bill, will increase the value and impact of our investments in science and innovation in the years ahead. 1 Joseph Johnson: We are looking very carefully at the report and will be coming forward with our response in Adam Afriyie: I thank the Minister for that answer. It due course. has certainly been a good time for science and innovation in Britain. It has also been a good year for the UK space sector, with Major Tim Peake’s historic visit to Dr James Davies (Vale of Clwyd) (Con): Chemical the international space station and a new spaceport and pharmaceutical businesses are an important feature here in the UK. It certainly strikes me that the next big of the northern powerhouse and emerging enterprises challenge will be the successful delivery of the ExoMars in the sector are often rooted in university research labs. programme, particularly given some of the rumours What support and funding can the UK Government that have been going around. Will the Minister update commit to encourage continued research collaboration the House on any progress made at the European Space across Europe—and indeed the rest of the world—to Agency summit recently? increase our innovative business base post-Brexit? Joseph Johnson: Yes, I am happy to provide a brief Joseph Johnson: Wesupport international collaboration update. My hon. Friend is an aficionado of space policy in science and research in Europe, and indeed around and former chair of the parliamentary space committee, the world, and will continue to do so. so he will be delighted to know that we had an excellent outcome at the European Space Agency’s Council of 20. [907838] Alan Brown (Kilmarnock and Loudoun) Ministers. We committed a further ¤1.44 billion, which (SNP): The Government talk about promoting science has secured the future of the ExoMars programme, and innovation, but this Government pulled the plug on among many other things. funding for carbon capture and storage. How much of the additional £4.7 billion R and D money announced Mr Barry Sheerman (Huddersfield) (Lab/Co-op): I in the autumn statement will be allocated for carbon do not want to ruin the Minister’s Christmas celebrations, capture and storage? which are imminent, but if he looks at the deplorable investment in research and development—the figures that came out only this week—does he not see that he Joseph Johnson: We will consult the sector and the needs to wake up and smell the coffee? The fact of the science community very carefully as part of our matter is that research and innovation will be deeply development of the industrial strategy, in a discussion damaged by leaving the European Union.
Recommended publications
  • Deterrence of Fraud with EU Funds Through Investigative Journalism in EU-27

    Deterrence of Fraud with EU Funds Through Investigative Journalism in EU-27

    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT D: BUDGETARY AFFAIRS Deterrence of fraud with EU funds through investigative journalism in EU-27 STUDY Abstract: The study depicts the state of investigative journalism in the 27 EU member states, with a focus on Denmark, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Spain, UK and a special focus on the interaction between European institutions and investigative journalists. It illustrates conditions promoting or impeding good investigative journalism in general, and in particular for reporting on fraud with EU funds and revenues. It recommends: a swift implementation of workable freedom of information laws across the EU, comprehensiveness of data provided by EU bodies and member states on their spending, targeted training for journalists, promotion of investigative centres and more cooperation between journalists and officials at EU and national levels, this in view of advanced transparency and helping citizens to understand the added value of EU spending. 17/10/2012 PE 490.663 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control. It designated Bart STAES, MEP, to follow the study. AUTHORS Principal author for Fonds Pascal Decroos: Margo Smit, director Vereniging van Onderzoeksjournalisten co-authors: Brigitte Alfter, Mar Cabra, Annamarie Cumiskey, Ides Debruyne, Marcos García Rey, Rafael Njotea, Albrecht Ude Rozenweg 4-B B-1731 Zellik Belgium RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Helmut Werner Policy Department D: Budgetary Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Translation executive summaries: DE, FR ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in August 2012.
  • IICSA Inquiry-Westminster 29 March 2019

    IICSA Inquiry-Westminster 29 March 2019

    IICSA Inquiry-Westminster 29 March 2019 1 Friday, 29 March 2019 1 various matters that arose during Ms Reason's evidence. 2 (10.00 am) 2 That is GNP001006. 3 THE CHAIR: Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the final 3 We invite you to adduce the witness statement of 4 day of this public hearing. Ms Beattie? 4 Christopher Horne, dated March 2019. Mr Horne describes 5 Witness statements adduced by MS BEATTIE 5 how, during the 1972 by-election, there was talk that 6 MS BEATTIE: Good morning, chair. Before we turn to closing 6 Cyril Smith had committed sexual offences with young 7 submissions, there is some further evidence that we 7 boys. Mr Horne, who was a supporter of the Conservative 8 would invite you to adduce. The first is the second 8 Party candidate, David Trippier, says the local police 9 witness statement of Gary Richardson, a detective 9 took action to ensure that this information was not 10 superintendent British Transport Police, dated 10 disseminated, including by a police visit to the 11 13 March 2019. This concerns email correspondence 11 Conservative Party campaign office where the police said 12 received by the British Transport Police from 12 that any mention of Cyril Smith's predilection for young 13 North Wales Police in 2017 about Peter Morrison being 13 boys would be treated as a criminal offence and lead to 14 taken off a train at Crewe Railway Station. The British 14 an order to stay out of the by-election. That reference 15 Transport Police did not take any further action in 15 is INQ004206.
  • How Leveson Got It Wrong Page 8

    How Leveson Got It Wrong Page 8

    FREE£1 No 215 Summer 2018 Journal Press of the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom MEDIA REFORM 3 END OF THE NINE VOTES, ROAD FOR CPBF AGM to discuss closure THAT’S ALL of the campaign IT CAME TO ON MAY 9, by 304 to 295, the Commons killed off the continuation of the Leveson Inquiry that had done so much to check the power and corruption of Big Media. How Leveson Another vote a week later confirmed the sentence, and Parliamentary support for attempts to enact the got it wrong 4 last elements of Leveson’s proposals for reform fell THEY THINK away. The Labour Party dropped its amendment to Page 8 confirm the incentives for publishers to offer arbitra- IT’S ALL OVER tion to everyone with complaints against the press, But investigative and that was the formal end of a seven-year battle for This was wholly untrue. There had been no journalism thrives media justice. extinction threat, and the move could actually weaken It was back to business as usual with a desperate a free press if a government wanted to. right-wing government pandering to a rampant All along, IPSO has dragged its feet on arbitration. right-wing press. After two years, it grudgingly introduced a voluntary The phone-hacking scandal in 2011 had launched the scheme. Publishers were not required to join this strongest protest ever mounted against the big media scheme, nor to agree to arbitrate every complaint publishers. It brought the sensational Leveson Inquiry even if they did. There were restrictive conditions for and its legal changes to introduce fairness to media complainants on costs and awards, and no cases were regulation.
  • IICSA Inquiry-Westminster 7 March 2019 (+44)207 4041400 Casemanagers@Epiqglobal.Com London EC4A 1JS Epiq Europe Ltd

    IICSA Inquiry-Westminster 7 March 2019 (+44)207 4041400 [email protected] London EC4A 1JS Epiq Europe Ltd

    IICSA Inquiry-Westminster 7 March 2019 1 Thursday, 7 March 2019 1 Q. Thank you. For the rest of this morning, we can all 2 (10.00 am) 2 assume that, when we talk about Operation Conifer, we 3 THE CHAIR: Good morning, everyone. Welcome to Day 4 of 3 are talking about your Operation Conifer. 4 this public hearing. Mr O'Connor? 4 Let me ask you this: is that operation still active? 5 MR O'CONNOR: Good morning, chair. Our first witness this 5 A. No, it's not. No, it's concluded. 6 morning, chair, is Mr Kirby, who is in the witness box. 6 Q. You know, Mr Kirby, that Operation Conifer, the 7 MR STEPHEN KIRBY (sworn) 7 Wiltshire Police Operation Conifer, is not, broadly 8 Examination by MR O'CONNOR 8 speaking, within the scope of this investigation. 9 MR O'CONNOR: Could you give your full name, please? 9 However, there is one small exception to that, which 10 A. Yes, my name is Stephen Kirby. I'm from 10 relates to information that you received either towards 11 Wiltshire Police and I'm a detective superintendent. 11 the end of or, in fact, after the conclusion of your 12 Q. Mr Kirby, in your witness statement you describe 12 investigation from two retired police officers named 13 yourself as the senior investigating officer for 13 Sinclair and Holmes. Do you understand? 14 Operation Conifer. Mr Kirby, we, in this room, have 14 A. I do. 15 heard evidence in the last few days about an 15 Q.
  • The Formation of Organized Abuse “Media Templates”

    The Formation of Organized Abuse “Media Templates”

    http://criminology.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.001.0001/acrefore- 9780190264079-e-113 Organized sexual abuse refers to the coordinated sexual abuse of multiple children by multiple perpetrators. It has proved to be a particularly controversial form of sexual abuse. Initial reports of organized abuse in the 1980s were met with shock and disbelief, followed by a significant backlash as Journalists and academics claimed that organized abuse allegations were the product of “moral panic” and “false memories.” In the mass media, investigations into organized abuse were presented throughout the 1990s as evidence that public anxiety about child sexual abuse had generated a “witch-hunt” in which even the most outrageous allegation of abuse was considered credible. While this argument was advanced by Journalists and academics, it developed first in the mass media, where the culture of news production promoted a particularly skeptical view of sexual abuse allegations. Claims of a sexual abuse witch-hunt were embedded within a broader backlash against feminism and child protection that called into question the prevalence and severity of sexual violence. Journalists and editors took a particularly activist role in the social construction of organized abuse as synonymous with false and exaggerated allegations. A number of recent developments have fragmented an apparent Journalistic consensus over the incredibility of organized abuse claims. The mass media has played a key role in publicizing the problem of clergy abuse, focusing in particular on institutionalized cultures of silence and disbelief. Sexual abuse by celebrities and authority figures has also received global media coverage and emphasized the failure of authorities to act on reports or suspicion of sexual abuse.
  • Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster: Investigation Report

    Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster: Investigation Report

    Allegations child sexual of abuse Westminster to linked Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster Investigation Report Investigation Investigation Report February 2020 February 2020 2020 Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster Investigation Report February 2020 A report of the Inquiry Panel Professor Alexis Jay OBE Professor Sir Malcolm Evans KCMG OBE Ivor Frank Drusilla Sharpling CBE © Crown copyright 2020 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the document title specified. Where third‑party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] or Freepost IICSA INDEPENDENT INQUIRY. This publication is available at https://www.iicsa.org.uk/reports CCS1219768174 02/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled‑fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. The following corrections were made to this version of the report on 29 May 2020: Page vii, paragraph 3: was amended to read ‘hand over the same documents’. Page 159 in Annex 1: profession removed, amended to read David Ford Campbell-Chalmers Contents Executive Summary v Part A: Introduction 1 A.1: Background
  • Can the Justice System Adequately Rectify Wrongful Convictions for Historical Sexual Abuse?

    Can the Justice System Adequately Rectify Wrongful Convictions for Historical Sexual Abuse?

    CAN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM ADEQUATELY RECTIFY WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS FOR HISTORICAL SEXUAL ABUSE? A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2020 NAOMI-ELLEN J. SPEECHLEY School of Social Sciences Department of Criminology Table of contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 7 CHAPTER ONE: Wrongful Convictions and Post-Conviction Investigation .......................... 11 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Part 1: ‘Wrongful Convictions’, ‘Miscarriages of Justice’ and ‘Unsafe Convictions’ ......................... 12 Part 2: How and by whom is a conviction reviewed? ....................................................................... 16 Part 3: Alternative post-conviction casework approaches: pro bono and campaigning groups ...... 26 Part 4: Applying ‘interested’ and ‘disinterested’ approaches to historical sexual abuse cases ....... 34 Chapter Summary ............................................................................................................................ 41 CHAPTER TWO: Particular Difficulties Pertaining to Historical Sexual Abuse Cases ......... 42 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................
  • The Impact of Being Wrongly Accused of Abuse in Occupations of Trust: Victims’ Voices

    The Impact of Being Wrongly Accused of Abuse in Occupations of Trust: Victims’ Voices

    The Impact of Being Wrongly Accused of Abuse in Occupations of Trust: Victims’ Voices Carolyn Hoyle, Naomi-Ellen Speechley, and Ros Burnett University of Oxford Centre for Criminology The Authors Professor Carolyn Hoyle has expertise on victims in criminal justice and on various aspects of miscarriages of justice. She has recently completed an in-depth study of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (Hoyle and Sato, forthcoming). Naomi-Ellen Speechley was a Research Assistant for Carolyn Hoyle’s study of the Criminal Cases Review Commission, and Lead Researcher for the present project. She was formerly Manager of the Innocence Project at the University of Leeds, and is embarking on a doctorate focused on miscarriages of justice (Speechley, 2013; McCartney and Speechley, 2015). Dr Ros Burnett, formerly a Reader in Criminology, is now a Research Associate at the Centre for Criminology, University of Oxford. She has recently edited a book on wrongful allegations of abuse (Burnett, in press). She is a voluntary research consultant to FACT. Acknowledgements and Declaration The research team is grateful to the research participants for their time and effort in contributing their voices. While the impetus to carry out the study came from a small bequest of £5000 towards research on false allegations, and FACT1 facilitated our access to ‘legally innocent’ participants, the focus, methodology, writing and production of the report and all other aspects of the project have been executed independently from FACT by a team at the Centre for Criminology, University of Oxford, generously funded by the University of Oxford John Fell Fund and the Law Faculty Research Support Fund.
  • Annual Report 2009 Annual Report 2009

    Annual Report 2009 Annual Report 2009

    King’s College, Cambridge Annual Report 2009 Annual Report 2009 Contents The Provost 2 The Fellowship 7 Undergraduates at King’s 18 Graduates at King’s 24 Tutorial 26 Research 32 Library 35 Chapel 38 Choir 41 Staff 43 Development 46 Members’ Information Form 51 Obituaries 55 Information for Members 259 The first and most obvious to the blinking, exploring, eye is buildings. If The Provost you go to the far side of the Market Place and look back, you now see three tall buildings: Great St Mary’s, King’s Chapel, and a taller Market Hostel. First spiky scaffolding reached above the original roof. Now it has all been shrouded in polythene, like a mystery shop window offering. It’ll stay 2 Things could only get better. You wrapped for a year until the major refit is completed next summer. 3 may remember that when I wrote THE PROVOST these notes last year, I had just Moving back into the main college in my exploratory perambulation, I find discovered that the College had more scaffolding. It’s on the Wilkins Screen. It’s on the Chapel, where through written to the local authorities THE PROVOST the summer we’ve moved down the entire South side, cleaning and treating saying that they were unaware of the glazing bars so that they no longer rust, expand, and prise off bits of the my place of residence. The College stone. Face lifts for the fountain and founder’s statue. So I see much activity, did not know where I was and I expensive activity.
  • The Independent Review of the Metropolitan Police Service's Handling of Non-Recent Sexual Offence Investigations Alleged Against Persons of Public Prominence

    The Independent Review of the Metropolitan Police Service's Handling of Non-Recent Sexual Offence Investigations Alleged Against Persons of Public Prominence

    The Independent Review of the Metropolitan Police Service's handling of non-recent sexual offence investigations alleged against persons of public prominence Introduction to publication Friday 4 October 2019 WARNING – The report which follows this introduction contains graphic descriptions of sexual abuse that people may find upsetting and disturbing If anyone has been affected by the content of the report, support and advice is available by contacting London Survivors Gateway on 0808 8010860 or Rape Crisis national helpline on 0808 802 9999. Introduction In February 2016, the former Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Lord Hogan-Howe, asked retired High Court Judge, Sir Richard Henriques, to carry out a review into the Metropolitan Police Service’s (MPS) handling of a series of allegations made by Carl Beech, known as Operation Midland. Lord Hogan-Howe also asked that Sir Richard review other separate investigations into allegations of non-recent sexual offences so that the MPS could learn any lessons from that review. Sir Richard’s subsequent report examined eight MPS investigations. He outlined serious failings in Operation Midland (Chapter 2 – allegations made by Carl Beech aka ‘Nick’) and Operation Vincente (Chapter 3 - an investigation into an allegation from a different complainant alleging rape by Lord Brittan.) The MPS has apologised for significant mistakes identified by Sir Richard. In commissioning the review, the MPS sought to open its investigations to significant scrutiny with the intention of learning any lessons from these types of cases involving historical allegations against persons of public prominence. The MPS is today publishing three chapters of Sir Richard Henriques' Independent Review: Chapter 1 entitled ‘Independent Review’ has previously been published in a redacted form, and the publication today removes the vast majority of those redactions.
  • Britain's Conservative Right Since 1945 Traditional Toryism in A

    Britain's Conservative Right Since 1945 Traditional Toryism in A

    Britain’s Conservative Right since 1945 Traditional Toryism in a Cold Climate Kevin Hickson Britain’s Conservative Right since 1945 Kevin Hickson Britain’s Conservative Right since 1945 Traditional Toryism in a Cold Climate Kevin Hickson Department of Politics University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK ISBN 978-3-030-27696-6 ISBN 978-3-030-27697-3 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27697-3 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifcally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microflms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifc statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affliations.
  • 'I Watched Tory MP MURDER a Boy During Depraved Westminster VIP Paedophile Party'

    'I Watched Tory MP MURDER a Boy During Depraved Westminster VIP Paedophile Party'

    'I watched Tory MP MURDER a boy during depraved Westminster VIP paedophile party' • 22:30, 15 November 2014 • By Keir Mudie , Mark Conrad • Mirror.co.uk The abuse victim's claims are being treated as credible by detectives now investigating THREE murders allegedly linked to a network of VIP perverts. A victim of the Westminster paedophile abuse scandal has claimed he saw a Conservative MP murder a young boy during a depraved sex party. And the Sunday People can reveal that detectives are investigating THREE murders allegedly linked to a network of VIP perverts. The horrifying account comes days after Scotland Yard confirmed they have launched a murder probe connected to allegations of sex abuse from the 1970s and 80s. Today the Sunday People and Exaro investigations agency expose the full extent of shocking events the witness, known as Nick, has described to the Metropolitan Police paedophile unit. Nick claims the first death was of a boy aged ten or 11 who was deliberately run down by a car. Another chilling allegation is that he was in the same room in the 1980s when a 12-year-old boy was strangled by a Tory MP. Nick said: “I watched while that happened. I am not sure how I got out of that. Whether I will ever know why I survived, I am not sure.” Eighteen months later, he claims a third boy was killed by two unknown men in front of another MP. Nick told of his terror as he and the strangling victim were driven to an orgy. Whistleblower: Nick has given detailed and lengthy evidence to detectives He said: “We looked at each other and saw the fear in each other’s eyes.