Measles Vaccination and the British State

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Measles Vaccination and the British State The Spectre of Controversy: Measles Vaccination and the British State A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health 2017 Andrew M. Black School of Medical Sciences, Division of Medical Education Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................... 2 List of Figures and Tables ......................................................................................................... 4 Figures .................................................................................................................................. 4 Tables ................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................. 5 Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 6 Declaration ............................................................................................................................... 7 Copyright Statement.................................................................................................................. 7 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 9 Primary sources ................................................................................................................... 21 Thesis outline ...................................................................................................................... 22 Future Research .................................................................................................................. 24 Chapter 1: Making Measles Visible .......................................................................................... 28 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 28 1.2 Globulins, antibiotics and nursing: How to manage ‘mild’ measles ................................. 33 1.3 ‘A mild illness’: The limits of vital statistics .................................................................... 44 1.4 A shot in the arm: US vaccination and British debates ................................................... 51 1.5 ‘1 in every 15’: Making morbidity visible ........................................................................ 65 1.6 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 73 Chapter 2: Regulation by Committee: Assessing the Risks of Measles Vaccine Trials ............... 76 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 76 2.2 ‘A woeful product’: Assessing Britain’s first measles vaccines ........................................ 78 2.3 Experimenting on ‘mentally deficient children’: Britain’s first measles vaccine trial ........ 84 2.4 ‘An impracticable material’: Killed measles vaccine not on trial ...................................... 92 2.5 The trial that never began .............................................................................................. 97 2.6 ‘An opinion of one member’: Politics and risk ............................................................. 103 2.7 Science, politics and the public: Changing perceptions of risk ...................................... 105 2.8 The trial ....................................................................................................................... 115 2.9 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 117 2 Chapter 3: Telling a Banal Story: Representing the Medical Research Council’s Measles Vaccines Protection Trial ..................................................................................................................... 120 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 120 3.2 Designing a trial ........................................................................................................... 123 3.3 Publicity campaign ....................................................................................................... 128 3.4 Withdrawn or excluded? Beckenham 20 not on trial .................................................... 143 3.5 Lost in translation: The forgotten story of Wellcovax .................................................. 148 3.6 From ‘disappointing’ to ‘satisfactory’: The results of the MVC’s protection trial .......... 151 3.7 Telling a bland story: Publicising the results of the MVC’s protection trial ................... 156 3.8 Making measles vaccination policy ............................................................................... 168 3.9 Black boxed: The MVC’s protection trial ..................................................................... 172 3.10 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 177 Chapter 4: Making Wellcovax Disappear ............................................................................... 179 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 179 4.2 ‘Not for publication’: The private regulation of Wellcovax ........................................... 181 4.3 Preventing fear, panic and controversy ........................................................................ 195 4.4 From doubt to danger: Re-assessing the risks of Wellcovax ......................................... 205 4.5 ‘What should we do?’: The global story of Wellcovax .................................................. 211 4.6 Communicating closure: Making Wellcovax disappear ................................................. 216 4.7 A private confession .................................................................................................... 222 4.8 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 226 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 229 Bibliography .......................................................................................................................... 236 Archival sources ................................................................................................................ 236 Published Sources ............................................................................................................. 244 Word Count: 75,701 3 List of Figures and Tables Figures Figure 1. The front cover of the Central Council for Health 36 Education’s 1956 measles pamphlet: ‘Measles: How to Spot it and What to do About it’ Figure 2. Newspaper article reporting on British attempts to develop a 60 measles vaccine Figure 3. Draft consent form for the Measles Vaccines Committee’s 130 protection trial Figure 4. Newspaper article reporting the details of the Measles 136 Vaccines Committee’s protection trial Figure 5. Notes to aid Medical Research Council staff when answering 164 questions about the Measles Vaccines Committee’s protection trial Figure 6. The front cover of the Ministry of Health’s 1968 measles 176 vaccination leaflet: ‘Now your Child can be Vaccinated Against Measles’ Figure 7. Adverse reactions to Measles Vaccines 190 Figure 8. An advert for measles vaccination and a newspaper article 195 reporting the suspension of Wellcovax Figure 9. Department of Health and Social Security’s press release 218-219 reporting the news of Wellcovax’s withdrawal from British vaccination campaigns Tables Table 1. Principal causes of death in England and Wales from 1957 to 48 1962 Table 2. Number of deaths from principal infective diseases in 49 England and Wales from 1940 to 1962 Table 3. Number of cases and deaths from measles in England and 49 Wales from 1940 to 1962 Table 4. Number and rate of complications from measles 71 Table 5. Number and rate of Hospital admissions from measles 71 Table 6. Participants attending the Medical Research Council’s 79 Informal Conference on Measles Prophylaxis Table 7. Members of the Medical Research Council’s Measles Vaccine 100 Trial Committee Table 8. Members of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and 112 Immunisation’s Measles Vaccination Sub-Committee Table 9. Vaccine supply 125 Table 10. Number of adverse reactions reported to the measles vaccine 185 batch surveillance scheme 4 List of Abbreviations BMA British Medical Association BMJ British Medical Journal BW Burroughs Wellcome CMO Chief Medical Officer CSD Committee on Safety of Drugs CSM Committee on Safety of Medicines DHSS Department of Health and Social Security EPHLS Emergency Public Health Laboratory Service JCVI Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation MRC Medical Research Council MVC Measles Vaccines Committee NHS National Health Service NIMR National Institute for
Recommended publications
  • Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster: Investigation Report
    Allegations child sexual of abuse Westminster to linked Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster Investigation Report Investigation Investigation Report February 2020 February 2020 2020 Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster Investigation Report February 2020 A report of the Inquiry Panel Professor Alexis Jay OBE Professor Sir Malcolm Evans KCMG OBE Ivor Frank Drusilla Sharpling CBE © Crown copyright 2020 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the document title specified. Where third‑party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] or Freepost IICSA INDEPENDENT INQUIRY. This publication is available at https://www.iicsa.org.uk/reports CCS1219768174 02/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled‑fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. The following corrections were made to this version of the report on 29 May 2020: Page vii, paragraph 3: was amended to read ‘hand over the same documents’. Page 159 in Annex 1: profession removed, amended to read David Ford Campbell-Chalmers Contents Executive Summary v Part A: Introduction 1 A.1: Background
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009 Annual Report 2009
    King’s College, Cambridge Annual Report 2009 Annual Report 2009 Contents The Provost 2 The Fellowship 7 Undergraduates at King’s 18 Graduates at King’s 24 Tutorial 26 Research 32 Library 35 Chapel 38 Choir 41 Staff 43 Development 46 Members’ Information Form 51 Obituaries 55 Information for Members 259 The first and most obvious to the blinking, exploring, eye is buildings. If The Provost you go to the far side of the Market Place and look back, you now see three tall buildings: Great St Mary’s, King’s Chapel, and a taller Market Hostel. First spiky scaffolding reached above the original roof. Now it has all been shrouded in polythene, like a mystery shop window offering. It’ll stay 2 Things could only get better. You wrapped for a year until the major refit is completed next summer. 3 may remember that when I wrote THE PROVOST these notes last year, I had just Moving back into the main college in my exploratory perambulation, I find discovered that the College had more scaffolding. It’s on the Wilkins Screen. It’s on the Chapel, where through written to the local authorities THE PROVOST the summer we’ve moved down the entire South side, cleaning and treating saying that they were unaware of the glazing bars so that they no longer rust, expand, and prise off bits of the my place of residence. The College stone. Face lifts for the fountain and founder’s statue. So I see much activity, did not know where I was and I expensive activity.
    [Show full text]
  • TREASURY the TRIAL On
    FABIAN REVIEW The quarterly magazine of the Fabian Society Summer 2014 / fabians.org.uk / £4.95 The TREASURY on TRIAL The Fabian Review examines the Treasury’s dominant position in UK policymaking and outlines reforms to help make progressive promises a reality / Keir Starmer and Francesca Klug defend the human rights act p16 / Mary Riddell interviews Labour rising star Lisa Nandy p22 But we are not a rich organisation. For 130 years the Fabian Society has We don’t have lots of big backers. championed ideas and ideals that have We rely on the generosity of our members shaped the left in Britain. to survive and thrive. The society today is the bearer In 2014 our goal is to raise of that proud tradition. £30,000 to support our vital work on tackling inequality in Britain. > CAN YOU HELP US? < Even a small regular donation will help Please visit: www.fabians.org.uk/members/fabians-130-appeal Contents FABIAN REVIEW Volume 126—No. 2 Leader Andrew Harrop 2 Taxing problems Shortcuts Amina Lone, Dan Silver 3 Not racist, just resentful Tom Clark 4 Osborne’s choice Ellie Cumbo 4 Enemies of the state? Michael Meacher 5 On the attack Cover story Dan Corry 6 A new Treasury view Catherine Haddon 8 In control? Catherine Walsh 8 The Treasury we choose Christine Berry 9 The tyranny of the benefit-cost ratio Giles Wilkes, Stian Westlake 10 Unintended consequences David Powell 11 No one likes them, they don’t care Colin Thain 12 The changing of Horse Guards Feature Mark Ferguson 14 Brave new world Keir Starmer, Francesca Klug 16 The case for the Human Rights Act Steve Bendle, Pat Conaty 18 In trust Interview Mary Riddell 22 Under the radar Books Dick Leonard 25 The public – and private – life of Roy Jenkins 27 Fabian Society section FABIAN REVIEW FABIAN SOCIETY Events and Partnerships Membership Fabian Review is the quarterly journal of the 61 Petty France Assistant, Ben Sayah Membership Officer, Fabian Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Tuesday Volume 618 13 December 2016 No. 80 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 13 December 2016 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2016 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 597 13 DECEMBER 2016 598 Jesse Norman: As I have said, it is premature to give House of Commons any kind of assurance. What is striking, though, is the amount of new investment that has been taking place in Tuesday 13 December 2016 this country,irrespective, one might think, of any concerns about Brexit. That includes investments in BAE Systems, Nissan, Jaguar Land Rover, Honda, Associated British The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Ports and many other large industrial players. PRAYERS Mr Steve Baker (Wycombe) (Con): Will my hon. Friend explore how World Trade Organisation-compliant tariff drawback mechanisms and inward processing [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] measures can ensure that the objectives of my hon. Friend the Member for Rossendale and Darwen (Jake Berry) are met? Oral Answers to Questions Jesse Norman: That is a formidably technically sophisticated question, for which I thank my hon. Friend. I think that it probably lies to be answered between BUSINESS, ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL ourselves and the Department for International Trade. STRATEGY We will certainly consider it carefully. Mr Speaker: There are some very clever people in The Secretary of State was asked— Wycombe, you know. Leaving the EU: Tariffs Kate Green (Stretford and Urmston) (Lab): Food 1. Jake Berry (Rossendale and Darwen) (Con): What production and food processing is an important part of steps the Government are taking to protect industries the north-west economy that is not necessarily susceptible based in (a) East Lancashire and (b) the UK from the to export beyond the European Union because of different potential effect of tariffs after the UK leaves the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • The Westminster Investigation Opening Statement By
    THE WESTMINSTER INVESTIGATION OPENING STATEMENT BY COUNSEL TO THE INQUIRY Introduction 1. Chair, today you and the Panel begin three weeks of hearings in the Westminster investigation, which is but one part of the statutory Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse set up by the then Home Secretary in March 2015, offering an unprecedented opportunity to examine the extent to which institutions and organisations in England & Wales have taken seriously their responsibility to protect children. 2. May I first make introductions of those who are present and represented before you today: I am Brian Altman QC, Lead Counsel to the Inquiry. I appear with Mr Andrew O’Connor QC, Lead Counsel to the Westminster Investigation, and we are assisted by Ms Kate Beattie, Mr Alasdair Henderson and Ms Katie O’Byrne. 3. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) is represented by Ms Zoe Johnson QC. The Labour Party is represented by Ms Eleanor Grey QC. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is represented by Ms Lorna Skinner. The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) is represented by Ms Samantha Leek QC. Wiltshire Police is represented by Ms Anne Studd QC. The Home Office, which has been granted core participant status in a representative capacity for Her Majesty's Government, is represented by Mr Nicholas Griffin QC. A group of seven complainants, whose ciphers are listed in the list of core participants, are represented by Mr Richard Scorer. Ms Esther Baker is represented by Mr Jonathan Price. Mr Tim Hulbert is represented ​ ​ by Mr Sam Stein QC. Finally, Mr Harvey Proctor is represented by Mr Geoffrey ​ Robertson QC.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster Abuse of Sexual Child Allegations Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster
    Allegations child sexual of abuse Westminster to linked Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster Investigation Report Investigation Investigation Report February 2020 February 2020 2020 Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster Investigation Report February 2020 A report of the Inquiry Panel Professor Alexis Jay OBE Professor Sir Malcolm Evans KCMG OBE Ivor Frank Drusilla Sharpling CBE © Crown copyright 2020 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the document title specified. Where third‑party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] or Freepost IICSA INDEPENDENT INQUIRY. This publication is available at https://www.iicsa.org.uk/reports CCS1219768174 02/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled‑fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Contents Executive Summary v Part A: Introduction 1 A.1: Background to the investigation 2 A.2: Scope of this investigation 3 A.3: Methodology 6 A.4: Terminology and references 7 Part B: Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster 9 B.1: The 1960s 10 B.2: The 1970s 10 B.3: The 1980s 11 B.4:
    [Show full text]
  • Kenneth Clarke 15 March 2019 14/24-15/5
    IICSA Inquiry-Westminster 15 March 2019 1 Friday, 15 March 2019 1 A. I'm afraid so. I beat Dennis Skinner by 25 minutes. He 2 (10.00 am) 2 was sworn in after me. 3 THE CHAIR: Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Day 10 of 3 Q. Something he still remembers as well as you? 4 this public hearing. Mr O'Connor? 4 A. I don't think -- I always remember, Gerald Kaufman asked 5 MR O'CONNOR: Good morning, chair. Our first witness this 5 me if he could go ahead of me in the queue, so he took 6 morning is Kenneth Clarke. 6 first turn as "Father of the House" in the '70 intake. 7 MR KENNETH HARRY CLARKE (sworn) 7 Q. As I said, you were in the Whips' Office in 1972 -- 8 Examination by MR O'CONNOR 8 A. I had two years. 9 MR O'CONNOR: Can you give your full name, please? 9 Q. -- only a couple of years after you started -- 10 A. Kenneth Clarke. My full name is Kenneth Harry Clarke. 10 A. The last two years of the Heath government, when we were 11 Q. Thank you. Mr Clarke, you have had a long and 11 taking through the legislation to join the European 12 distinguished political career. You have been MP for 12 Community. 13 Rushcliffe since June 1970? 13 Q. I'm not going to ask you about Brexit? 14 A. That's so. 14 A. No, "tout ça change", but that's not the subject for 15 Q.
    [Show full text]
  • Thousands-Say-E-Book.Pdf
    ! " # ! " # $ ! % " ! %# & $ ' % " % % ! $ ' % # !% % $ ()* +! ,! $ ! !"!"#$% "& &' !"!"#$% "& &' () *() ! " # $ !% ! & $ ' ' ($ ' # % % ) %* %' $ ' + " % & ' ! # $, ( $ - . ! "- ( % . % % % % $ $ $ - - - - // $$$ 0 1"1"#23." "0" )*4/ +) * !5 !& 6!7%66898& % ) - 2 : ! * & (#+, -./0 /- ;9<89"0" )*4/ +) "3 " & 9<89 CONTENTS Chapter One: Introduction 3 Chapter Two Rent Strike Sources: Review 13 Part One: Housing: the Politics of Consensus 14 Part Two: the Nation on Rent Strike 24 Part Three: the Merseyside Dimension 36 Chapter Three Rent Strike History: Methods 48 Chapter Four 1968-1969: AMovement in the Making 68 Chapter Five ‘We’ve Got An Open Air Loo, Have You?’ The Campaign for Real Homes 1969-1971 94 Chapter Six Fair Rent is Bent! Tenants Take on the Government 145 Chapter Seven Breaking the Law: Tower Hill Fights On 184 Chapter Eight: Conclusion 225 References 240 Appendix Chronology of Resistance 247 Acknowledgements Grateful thanks are extended to the
    [Show full text]
  • Colin Legum Papers
    BC1329 The Colin Legum Papers Donated to UCT Libraries by Mrs Margaret Legum A list compiled by André Landman 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE 1 2. THE COLLECTION 2 3. INVENTORY 4 A BIOGRAPHICAL AND PERSONAL DOCUMENTS 4 A1 Biographic citations and entries 4 A2 Family documents 4 A3 Financial matters 4 A4 Military service 4 A5 Travel documents and Press Cards 5 A6 Honours 5 B CORRESPONDENCE 5 B1 "A" 5 B2 "B" 12 B3 "C" 27 B4 "D" 36 B5 "E" 43 B6 "F" 45 B7 "G" 51 B8 "H" 58 B9 "I" 67 B10 "J" 73 B11 "K" 76 B12 "L" 84 B13 "M" 93 B14 "N" 104 B15 "O" 107 B16 "P" 110 B17 "Q" 112 B18 "R" 112 B19 "S" 118 B20 "T" 129 B21 "U" 139 B22 "V" 145 B23 "W" 148 B24 "Y" 165 B25 "Z" 165 B26 Christmas cards 165 C PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL INTERESTS 166 C1 Academia 166 C2 Advisory Group on UN Affairs 166 C3 Africa Associated Newspapers 166 C4 Africa Bureau 166 C5 Africa Educational Trust 170 C6 Africa Publications Trust 172 C7 British Tunisian Society 172 C8 Cultural interests 172 C9 Editor of Forward 173 C10 Jerusalem Report 174 C11 Jewish Board of Deputies 174 C12 Minority Rights Group 174 i C13 Muizenberg Millennium Educational Trust (Colin Legum trustee) 175 C14 New York Times (guest columnist) 175 C15 The Observer years 176 C16 Olaf Palme's Southern Africa Initiative 185 C17 Colin Legum's involvement in South African politics 186 C18 SA Unity Theatre Group 192 C19 South African Association of Arts 192 C20 South African Institute of Race Relations 193 C21 South African Society of Journalists 193 C22 Southern Africa Study Group 193 C23 Study Project
    [Show full text]