DOCSLIB.ORG

Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster Abuse of Sexual Child Allegations Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster Abuse of Sexual Child Allegations Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster Allegations child sexual of abuse Westminster to linked Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster Investigation Report Investigation Investigation Report February 2020 February 2020 2020 Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster Investigation Report February 2020 A report of the Inquiry Panel Professor Alexis Jay OBE Professor Sir Malcolm Evans KCMG OBE Ivor Frank Drusilla Sharpling CBE © Crown copyright 2020 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the document title specified. Where third‑party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] or Freepost IICSA INDEPENDENT INQUIRY. This publication is available at https://www.iicsa.org.uk/reports CCS1219768174 02/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled‑fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Contents Executive Summary v Part A: Introduction 1 A.1: Background to the investigation 2 A.2: Scope of this investigation 3 A.3: Methodology 6 A.4: Terminology and references 7 Part B: Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster 9 B.1: The 1960s 10 B.2: The 1970s 10 B.3: The 1980s 11 B.4: The 1990s 13 Part C: Searches at the security and intelligence agencies and at Metropolitan Police Special Branch 15 Part D: Police responses to allegations of Westminster child sexual abuse 21 D.1: Introduction 22 D.2: The Home Secretary and the Metropolitan Police Commissioner 23 D.3: The Clubs Office 24 D.4: Howard Groves and Operation Circus 31 D.5: Sir Cyril Smith, Special Branch and the South African connection 32 D.6: Sir Cyril Smith and the Special Branch raid on the Bury Messenger: Don Hale’s allegations 35 D.7: Allegations connected to Elm Guest House 40 D.8: Concerns raised by Peter McKelvie 42 Part E: Political parties 47 E.1: Introduction 48 E.2: The Liberal Party and Sir Cyril Smith 48 E.3: The Conservative Party and Sir Peter Morrison 62 Part F: Whips 79 F.1: Introduction 80 F.2: The whips’ offices in Westminster 80 F.3: The keeping of notes and ‘dirt books’ 83 F.4: Allegations of child sexual abuse 85 Part G: The Paedophile Information Exchange 87 G.1: Introduction 88 G.2: PIE’s links with other organisations 90 G.3: Allegation that the Home Office funded PIE 96 Part H: Prosecutorial decisions 107 H.1: Introduction 108 H.2: Victor Montagu 108 H.3: Sir Peter Hayman 113 Part I: Honours system 127 I.1: Introduction 128 I.2: Operation of the honours system 128 I.3: Particular cases 130 Part J: Safeguarding 137 J.1: Introduction 138 J.2: Safeguarding and child protection policies in government departments, political parties and the Palace of Westminster 138 J.3: The intelligence and security agencies 144 Part K: Conclusions and recommendations 147 K.1: Conclusions 148 K.2: Recommendations 152 Annexes 155 Annex 1: Overview of process and evidence obtained by the Inquiry 156 Annex 2: Glossary 168 Annex 3: Acronyms 172 Executive Summary This investigation concerns institutional responses to allegations of child sexual abuse and exploitation involving persons of public prominence who were associated with Westminster. Westminster is defined in this report as the centre of the United Kingdom’s government, government ministers and officials, as well as Parliament, its members and the political parties represented there. Seven topics were covered in evidence. These were: police misconduct, political parties, whips’ offices, the Paedophile Information Exchange, prosecutorial decisions, the honours system, and current safeguarding policies in government, Parliament and the political parties. Several cross‑cutting themes recurred throughout the investigation. One is the theme of ‘deference’ by police, prosecutors and political parties towards politicians and others believed to have some importance in public life. Another concerns differences in treatment accorded to wealthy or well‑connected people as opposed to those who were poorer, more deprived, and who had no access to networks of influence. A third relates to the failure by almost every institution to put the needs and safety of children first. The police paid little regard to the welfare of sexually exploited children. Political parties showed themselves, even very recently, to be more concerned about political fallout than safeguarding; and in some cases the honours system prioritised reputation and discretion in making awards, with little or no regard for victims of nominated persons. There is ample evidence that individual perpetrators of child sexual abuse have been linked to Westminster. However, there was no evidence of any kind of organised ‘Westminster paedophile network’ in which persons of prominence conspired to pass children amongst themselves for the purpose of sexual abuse. The source of some of the most lurid claims about a sinister network of abusers in Westminster has now been discredited with the conviction of Carl Beech. Nevertheless, it is clear that there have been significant failures by Westminster institutions in their responses to allegations of child sexual abuse. This included failure to recognise it, turning a blind eye to it, actively shielding and protecting child sexual abusers and covering up allegations. Several highly placed people in the 1970s and 1980s, including Sir Peter Morrison MP and Sir Cyril Smith MP, were known or rumoured to be active in their sexual interest in children and were protected from prosecution in a number of ways, including by the police, the Director of Public Prosecutions and political parties. At that time, nobody seemed to care about the fate of the children involved, with status and political concerns overriding all else. Even though we did not find evidence of a Westminster network, the lasting effect on those who suffered as children from being sexually abused by individuals linked to Westminster has been just as profound. It has been compounded by institutional complacency and indifference to the plight of child victims. There was no evidence that individual persons of prominence visited Elm Guest House in South London, although child sexual abuse almost certainly occurred there. v Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster: Investigation Report Police investigations A vivid picture of corruption in central London in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s was portrayed by several witnesses. This included the cruising of expensive cars around Piccadilly Circus, by those viewing boys and young men, who would hang around the railings known as the ‘meat rack’ to be picked up by older men and abused. The boys were described as aged between 11 and 22. Many were from damaged backgrounds or were runaways from the care system, and were known as ‘street rats’ by police officers. Lord Taverne, a Home Office minister in 1966, described a meeting with the then Home Secretary, Roy Jenkins, and the then Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Joe Simpson, at which Sir Joe remarked that there were “several ‘cottages’ in Westminster which we don’t investigate” because “they are frequented by celebrities and MPs”.1 While not specifically about the sexual abuse of children, it is an example of a policy giving special treatment to persons of prominence and of deference towards those in power at Westminster. The Clubs Office at the Metropolitan Police Service The Clubs Office was a department of the Metropolitan Police Service specialising in the licensing and supervision of nightclubs, and vice and obscene publications. Three retired officers described their experiences of working in the Clubs Office. Although runaway boys found at the ‘meat rack’ were often arrested and brought to the police station, little was done to protect them from harm. No specialist child protection unit existed and the procedures for looking after children were described as “rudimentary”. 2 Robert Glen, a retired officer who worked in the Clubs Office, told the Inquiry that his team had enough evidence to prosecute Cyril Smith in the 1970s for his involvement in sexual activity with young boys. Progress of that investigation was thwarted by senior officers at the time, who claimed that it was “too political”.3 He told us that “we did as we were told and you were not encouraged to question operational decisions made by senior officers”.4 Many years later another retired officer was traced who confirmed much of Mr Glen’s account. He explained that sex workers were treated by the vast majority of police officers as second‑class citizens. It was difficult to persuade victims to provide statements because they would be traumatised again by giving evidence. Cyril Smith’s name featured on at least two other occasions when police officers had cause to interview inmates at Feltham Borstal Institution on criminal matters. On one occasion officers were apparently stopped by Special Branch officers and ‘warned off’ the interview. They ignored the warning and, out of the blue, the inmate launched into a sexually explicit rant about the relationship he had had with Cyril Smith – something entirely unconnected with the purpose of the interview and that came as a surprise to the officers. On another occasion officers interviewed Andre Thorne, who claimed that he was a ‘rent boy’ and had engaged in sexual activity with Cyril Smith. He later publicly withdrew the allegations. A minor public scandal emerged around this time involving a plot by the South African Bureau 1 Lord Taverne 5 March 2019 195/17-196/7 2 Paul Holmes 7 March 2019 86/23-25 3 Robert Glen 6 March 2019 92/7-93/2 4 Robert Glen 6 March 2019 113/14-16 vi Executive Summary of State Security to smear Liberal MPs who opposed apartheid.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BDOHP Biographical Details and Index Lord Wright of Richmond
    BDOHP Biographical details and index Lord Wright of Richmond (28.06.31-06.03.20) - career outline with, on right, relevant page numbers in the memoir to the career stage. Served Royal Artillery, 1950–51 p 3 Joined Diplomatic Service, 1955 pp 2-3 Middle East Centre for Arabic Studies, 1956–57 pp 3-6 Third Secretary, British Embassy, Beirut, 1958–60 - Private Secretary to Ambassador and later First Secretary, pp 12-15 British Embassy, Washington, 1960–65 Private Secretary to Permanent Under-Secretary, FO, 1965–67 pp 10-11 First Secretary and Head of Chancery, Cairo, 1967–70 - Deputy Political Resident, Bahrain, 1971–72 - Head of Middle East Department, FCO, 1972–74 - Private Secretary (Overseas Affairs) to Prime Minister, 1974–77 pp 7-10, 25, 34-35 Ambassador to Luxembourg, 1977–79 pp 30-31 Ambassador to Syria, 1979–81 pp 30-33 Deputy Under-Secretary of State, FCO, 1982–84 - Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, 1984–86 pp 33-34, 36 Permanent Under-Secretary of State and Head pp 11-12, of Diplomatic Service, 1986–91. 16-18, 21, 30 Member, Security Commission, 1993–2002. - General comments on Middle East and United States, pp 6-8; political versus professional diplomatic appointments, pp 15-20; retirement age in diplomatic service, pp 21-23; recruitment, pp 23-25; Foreign Office image, pp 38-40; John Major, pp 40-42; leaking of restricted papers, pp 43-45. Lord Wright of Richmond This is Malcolm McBain interviewing Lord Wright of Richmond at his home in East Sheen on Monday, 16 October 2000. MMcB: “Lord Wright, you were born in 1931, educated at Marlborough and Merton College, Oxford, you did a couple of years’ national service in the Royal Artillery, and then joined the Diplomatic Service, presumably after going to Oxford, in 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • IICSA Inquiry-Westminster 29 March 2019
    IICSA Inquiry-Westminster 29 March 2019 1 Friday, 29 March 2019 1 various matters that arose during Ms Reason's evidence. 2 (10.00 am) 2 That is GNP001006. 3 THE CHAIR: Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the final 3 We invite you to adduce the witness statement of 4 day of this public hearing. Ms Beattie? 4 Christopher Horne, dated March 2019. Mr Horne describes 5 Witness statements adduced by MS BEATTIE 5 how, during the 1972 by-election, there was talk that 6 MS BEATTIE: Good morning, chair. Before we turn to closing 6 Cyril Smith had committed sexual offences with young 7 submissions, there is some further evidence that we 7 boys. Mr Horne, who was a supporter of the Conservative 8 would invite you to adduce. The first is the second 8 Party candidate, David Trippier, says the local police 9 witness statement of Gary Richardson, a detective 9 took action to ensure that this information was not 10 superintendent British Transport Police, dated 10 disseminated, including by a police visit to the 11 13 March 2019. This concerns email correspondence 11 Conservative Party campaign office where the police said 12 received by the British Transport Police from 12 that any mention of Cyril Smith's predilection for young 13 North Wales Police in 2017 about Peter Morrison being 13 boys would be treated as a criminal offence and lead to 14 taken off a train at Crewe Railway Station. The British 14 an order to stay out of the by-election. That reference 15 Transport Police did not take any further action in 15 is INQ004206.
    [Show full text]
  • The Performance of the Department for Culture Media and Sport 2012-13
    DEPARTMENTAL OVERVIEW The performance of the Department for Culture, Media & Sport 2012-13 MARCH 2014 Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. Our public audit perspective helps Parliament hold government to account and improve public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Amyas Morse, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO, which employs some 860 staff. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our studies evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our recommendations and reports on good practice help government improve public services, and our work led to audited savings of almost £1.2 billion in 2012. Contents Introduction Aim and scope of this briefing 4 Part One About the Department 5 Part Two Recent NAO work on the Department 21 Appendix One The Department’s sponsored bodies at 1 April 2013 30 Appendix Two Results of the Civil Service People Survey 2013 32 Appendix Three Publications by the NAO on the Department since April 2012 34 Appendix Four Cross-government reports of relevance to the Department in 2013 35 Links to external websites were valid at the time of publication of this report. The National Audit Office is not responsible for the future validity of the links.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Hydrant SIO Advice
    Operation Hydrant SIO advice November 2016 ™ BetterProfessionals forBetterPolicing college.police.uk College of Policing OFFICIAL In the absence of specifi authorised professional practice (APP) in this area, this publication provides a mechanism to share the operational experience of SIOs who have been running such cases. The purpose is to support SIOs to deliver a consistent and effective investigation. Many of the points included provide a framework for dealing with other types of investigation involving domestic abuse, honour-based violence, stalking and harassment, female genital mutilation and human traffic This advice draws on the experience of SIOs who have led investigations of this type and experts who specialise in this area of investigation. Further advice can be obtained from the National Coordinator’s Office. Telephone: S31(1)(a)(b) Email: S31(1)(a)(b) © College of Policing Limited (2016) This publication (excluding all images and logos) is licensed under the terms of the Non-Commercial College Licence v1.1 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence visit http://www.college.police.uk/Legal/Documents/Non_ Commercial_College_Licence.pdf Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] ii Operation Hydrant OFFICIAL OFFICIAL College of Policing Contents Foreword by Chief Constable Simon Bailey 03 Preface 04 1 Receiving a report 05 1.1
    [Show full text]
  • University of Dundee the Origins of the Jimmy Savile Scandal Smith, Mark
    University of Dundee The origins of the Jimmy Savile scandal Smith, Mark; Burnett, Ros Published in: International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy DOI: 10.1108/IJSSP-03-2017-0029 Publication date: 2018 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication in Discovery Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Smith, M., & Burnett, R. (2018). The origins of the Jimmy Savile scandal. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 38(1/2), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-03-2017-0029 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 The origins of the Jimmy Savile Scandal Dr Mark Smith, University of Edinburgh (Professor of Social Work, University of Dundee from September 2017) Dr Ros Burnett, University of Oxford Abstract Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the origins of the Jimmy Savile Scandal in which the former BBC entertainer was accused of a series of sexual offences after his death in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • FM Refresher Trainers Notes
    Creating Safer Space Foundation Module Refresher 2016 Edition Before the start of the training You should be well prepared to deliver this Refresher course and be familiar with its contents, some of which differ markedly from the original Foundation Module (FM). The FM course preparation instructions also apply and you should remind yourself of these. Indicative timings are included, so with a 10-minute coffee break the whole session lasts 2.5 hours. If you are working with a large group then you are likely to need longer. You may wish to send participants the course aims and learning agreement in advance. The course does not specifically focus on themes relating to diversity – language, culture, ethnicity, disability etc. Trainers will be expected to use practice or case examples to illustrate issues of diversity in safeguarding practice. There is a revised and updated Foundation Module and Foundation Module Refresher Handbook, 2016 Edition which should be given to participants. We have aimed to make it more local church focused with examples and case studies, so please encourage participants to read it. Course title and training personnel introduction Slide 1 Slide 2 2 Section 1: Welcome and devotions Slides 3–8 (15 minutes) Welcome participants who completed the FM at some point in the last five years and trust that they will be able to reflect on that learning and their experiences during this course. Some attending may have thought that the earlier FM training was a required ‘one off’, so may need encouragement to be open to new ideas and thinking. Describe how recent events have pushed safeguarding higher up the national agenda, and that the Church remains strongly committed to ensuring that all our churches are safe spaces for all.
    [Show full text]
  • American Jewish Year Book
    AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK A Record of Events iind Trends in American and World Jewish Life 1979 AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE AND JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY OF AMERICA The 1979 AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, the seventy-ninth in the series, continues to offer a unique chronicle of developments in areas of concern to Jews throughout the world. The present volume features Professor Charles Liebman s "Leadership and Decision-making in a Jewish Federation." This in- depth study of the New York Fed- eration of Jewish Philanthropies provides important insights into the changing outlook of American Jews, and the impact this is having on Jewish communal priorities. Another feature is Professor Leon Shapiro's "Soviet Jewry Since the Death of Stalin," an authoritative overview of Jewish life in the So- viet Union during the past twenty- five years. Particularly noteworthy is Professor Shapiro's emphasis on religious life and cultural endeavors. The review of developments in the United States includes Milton Ellerin's "Intergroup Relations"; George Gruen's "The United States, Israel and the Middle East"; and Geraldine Rosenfield's "The Jewish Community Responds to (Continued on back flap) $15. American Jewish Year Book American Jewish Year Book 1 VOLUME 79 Prepared by THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE Editors MORRIS FINE MILTON HIMMELFARB Associate Editor DAVID SINGER THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE NEW YORK THE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY OF AMERICA PHILADELPHIA COPYRIGHT, 1978 BY THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE AND THE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY OF AMERICA All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher: except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review to be printed in a magazine or newspaper.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persistence of Patriarchy Operation Yewtree and the Return to 1970S Feminism
    The persistence of patriarchy Operation Yewtree and the return to 1970s feminism Victoria Browne On 30 May 2014 a conference was held in London the workings of male power, privilege, domination to discuss the work and legacy of Kate Millett, an and violence, but which has become something of American feminist who rose to prominence follow- an embarrassment or anachronism within contem- ing the publication of Sexual Politics in 1970, and her porary feminism. In light of the current sex abuse appearance on the cover of Time magazine later that scandals (and the continuing prevalence of sexual year.1 Elsewhere in London, on the same day of the violence against women and children), I propose conference, popular entertainer Rolf Harris was in that feminists engage in a strategic reappraisal of Southwark Crown Court being tried on twelve counts ‘patriarchy’, to recover a political interpretation of of indecent assault between 1968 and 1986. The trial sexual violence/abuse in terms of structural male was an outcome of ‘Operation Yewtree’, the police power, rather than individual aberration or an ‘abuse investigation tasked in 2012 with gathering evidence of power’ in more general terms. of ‘historic sex abuse’, in the wake of numerous alle- gations that various media personalities and stars of Returning to ‘1970s feminism’ the ‘light entertainment’ world engaged in regular Over the past decade or so, there has been an increas- sexual harassment and abuse of women and children ing level of interest among Anglo-American academic throughout their careers in the 1970s and 1980s. feminists in how ‘1970s’ or ‘second-wave’ feminism It is an interesting piece of timing: whilst a group is remembered (or forgotten) in mainstream public of feminist theorists and activists were gathered discourse, and within feminist discourse itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Garter Banners
    Garter Banner Location (updated October 2017) Living Knights and Ladies of the Order are shown in bold Sovereigns of the Order 1901 - Edward VII - The Deanery, Windsor Castle 1910 – George V – above his tomb, Nave of St George’s Chapel 1936 – George VI - above The Queen’s stall, St George’s Chapel Ladies of the Garter 1901 - Queen Alexandra – the Deanery, Windsor Castle 1910 - Queen Mary – above her tomb St George’s Chapel 1936 - Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother – Clarence House 1994 – Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands 1958 – Queen Juliana of the Netherlands 1979 – Queen Margrethe of Denmark – St George’s Chapel 1989 – Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands – St George’s Chapel 1994 – HRH The Princess Anne (Princess Royal) – St George’s Chapel 2003 – HRH Princess Alexandra – St George’s Chapel Companions of the Order Queen Elizabeth II appointments 1009 – King Felipe VI of Spain - not yet in place 1008 – Sir David Brewer – St George’s Chapel 1007 – Lord Shuttleworth – St George’s Chapel 1006 – Baron King of Lothbury – St George’s Chapel 1005 – Baroness Manningham-Buller - St George’s Chapel 1004 - Lord Stirrup – St George’s Chapel 1003 – Lord Boyce – St George’s Chapel 1002 – Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers – St George’s Chapel 1001 – Sir Thomas Dunne – St George’s Chapel 1000 – HRH Prince William of Wales – St George’s Chapel 999 - Lord Luce – St George’s Chapel 998 – HRH The Earl of Wessex – St George’s Chapel 997 – HRH The Duke of York – St George’s Chapel 996 – Sir John Major – St George’s Chapel 995 – Lord Bingham of Cornhill – St
    [Show full text]
  • Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham - Alexis Jay Report
    Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham - Alexis Jay report Date 10 September 2014 Author Martin Rogers LGiU/CSN Associate Summary The report of the Independent Inquiry into child sexual exploitation (CSE) in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013, conducted by Alexis Jay OBE, was published by Rotherham Borough Council (which commissioned it) on 26 August 2014. The Leader of the Council resigned the same day, taking responsibility on behalf of the Council for the historic failings described in the report, and apologising to the young people and their families who had been so badly let down. The Chief Executive has now said he is leaving. The report has received widespread media coverage, with regular comment since its publication, including an urgent question (a request for a statement) in the House of Commons to Home Secretary Theresa May from her shadow, Yvette Cooper, on 2 September. The Commons Home Affairs Committee takes further evidence on child sexual exploitation in Rotherham on 9 September. This briefing contains a short summary of the report, and focuses more on the reaction to it and the implications for local authorities and their partners. It will be of interest to elected members and officers with responsibility for the broad range of services for children and young people, all of which have a role to play in identifying those at risk of sexual exploitation and in successful approaches to tackling it. Overview The Independent Inquiry commissioned by Rotherham Borough Council into child sexual exploitation (CSE), and conducted by Professor Alexis Jay OBE (previously Chief Social Work Adviser to the Scottish Government), found that a conservative estimate of 1,400 children were sexually exploited over the full Inquiry period from 1997 to 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Chilling Day Special Branch Swooped to Seize ANOTHER Dossier on VIP Abusers: 16 Mps' Names Mentioned in 1984 Report on Paedophile Lobby's Influence in Westminster
    Chilling day Special Branch swooped to seize ANOTHER dossier on VIP abusers: 16 MPs' names mentioned in 1984 report on paedophile lobby's influence in Westminster • Police raided newspaper offices of Don Hale, editor of Bury Messenger • He'd recently been given sensitive files by Labour politician Barbara Castle • Documents included typewritten minutes of meetings that had been held at Westminster in support of paedophile agenda • Included details of a host of Establishment figures who had apparently pledged support to their cause • Also mentioned multiple times was Tory minister Sir Rhodes Boyson, a well-known enthusiast for corporal punishment, and Education Secretary Sir Keith Joseph By Guy Adams for the Daily Mail Published: 00:59 GMT, 19 July 2014 | Updated: 20:03 GMT, 19 July 2014 X Barbara Castle: Worried about rising influence of paedophile lobby The knock on the door came early one day in the famously dry summer of 1984. It was just after 8 am, and Don Hale, the young editor of the Bury Messenger, was reading the daily papers at his desk as his reporters were beginning to arrive at the office. As Hale, then 31, answered the door, a trio of plain-clothes detectives barged in, followed by a dozen police officers in uniform. What happened next was, in Hale’s words, ‘like something out of totalitarian East Germany rather than Margaret Thatcher’s supposedly free Britain’. The detectives identified themselves as Special Branch, the division of the police responsible for matters of national security. ‘They began to flash warrant cards and bark questions,’ says Hale.
    [Show full text]
  • IICSA Inquiry (Preliminary) Janner Investigation 24 September 2019 (+
    IICSA Inquiry (Preliminary) Janner Investigation 24 September 2019 1 Tuesday, 24 September 2019 1 responses of those and other institutions were 2 (10.30 am) 2 appropriate and adequate and, if not, to consider why it 3 Welcome and opening remarks by THE CHAIR 3 was not and whether Lord Janner's position of prominence 4 THE CHAIR: Good morning, everyone. I am Alexis Jay, and 4 in public life improperly influenced those who had 5 I'm the chair of this public inquiry. 5 a responsibility to act. 6 Sitting with me are the other panel members of 6 The purpose of this third preliminary hearing is to 7 the inquiry: Professor Sir Malcolm Evans, 7 provide an update on the investigation and to hear 8 Drusilla Sharpling and Ivor Frank. 8 submissions from counsel to the inquiry and core 9 On behalf of the inquiry, I welcome you all to this, 9 participants on the future of the investigation. In 10 the third preliminary hearing in the investigation into 10 particular, there needs to be an update about the likely 11 institutional responses to allegations of child sexual 11 impact on this investigation of the recent work of 12 abuse made against the late Lord Janner of Braunstone 12 the Independent Office for Police Conduct. The 13 QC. 13 structure of the hearing is set out in the hearing 14 The inquiry's task in each investigation is to 14 agenda. 15 examine the extent to which public and private 15 Before we hear from counsel, there are a couple of 16 institutions in England and Wales have failed to protect 16 points on timing.
    [Show full text]