Mapping of Tourism Suitability Regarding Wetlands
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
										Recommended publications
									
								- 
												  Wetlands on Danube Delta Bioisphere ReserveWetland conservation and sustainable use in Romania Dr. Grigore Baboianu, Executive director, Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Romania 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 “Wetlands: home and destination” Romania Total surface: 238,391 km2 Inhabitants: 19,042,936 (2011) Etnic Groups: Romanian 89%, Hungarian 7.5%, Gipsy 1.9%, German & others 1.6% Position: Central South-Eastern 450 N Latitude 250 E Longitude Climate: Temperate (8 -110 C) Rainfall: 400-600 l/y 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Relief: Mountains (35%) - Carpathian, 910 km - Dobrogea Hills (35%) Plains (30%) Black Sea (245 km) Danube Delta (3,510 km2) 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Wetlands in Romania In Romania there were inventoried: Lakes: 3,450 (2,650 km2 - 1,1%): mountain (glacial, carst, vulcanoes), floodplain, reservoirs, marine and coastal lagoons and lakes of Danube Delta. Rivers: 120,000 km: (Danube River (1,075 km), 28 rivers >162 km (8,096 km)) Swamps: 215 (52 km2) Map of wetlands distribution in Romania 11TH Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Main use/role of wetlands: Flood Control Groundwater Replenishment Shoreline Stabilisation & Storm Protection Sediment & Nutrient Retention and Export Climate Change Mitigation Water Purification Reservoirs
- 
												  Smart, Sustainable, InclusiveContinuing previous meetings: Forum Carpaticum 2010 (Krakow, Poland), Forum Carpaticum 2012 (Stará Lesná, Slovakia), Forum Carpaticum 2014 (Lviv, Ukraine), Forum Carpaticum 2016 (Bucharest, Romania) addresses the need to make a bridge of smart sustainable development in the Carpathians with scientists, stakeholders, institutions, NGOs, communities. The Carpathian Region – the Green Backbone of Europe – faces many opportunities as well as challenges to the future development of the area. The stakeholders, decision makers and research communities can use them wisely for the enhanced protection and sustainable development of the Carpathians. These overall goals meet well with the EU 2020 Cohesion Policy, which proposes “Smart”, “Sustainable” and “Inclusive” to be the keywords when addressing the main priorities for the near future. Forum Carpaticum 2016 „Future of the Carpathians: Smart, Sustainable, Inclusive“ proposes to concentrate on these priorities and to debate how they can be implemented in the Carpathian Region, during the following main thematic sessions: Smart Carpathians session aims to present and discuss the leading edge achievements in: recent and future information and communication technologies; emerging paradigms and methodological developments; front-rank research infrastructures, capacities and innovations; open knowledge, information and data systems applications, in particular those of Carpathian interest. Sustainable Carpathians is expected to cover the topics that consider: climate change adaptation, risk prevention
- 
												  Retea Scolara 2018-2019Reţea şcolară Caraș-Severin 2018-2019 Nr. crt Denumire unitate de învățământ Localitate Localitate superioara Mediu Strada Numar Statut Tip unitate Denumire unitate cu personalitate juridică Forma de proprietate Telefon Fax Email 1 GRĂDINIŢA CU PROGRAM NORMAL NR.1 CELNIC ANINA ORAŞ ANINA URBAN CHEILE GÎRLIŞTEI 2 Arondată Unitate de învăţământ LICEUL „MATHIAS HAMMER“ ANINA Publică de interes naţional şi local 2 GRĂDINIŢA CU PROGRAM NORMAL NR.2 ORAŞUL NOU ANINA ORAŞ ANINA URBAN Arondată Unitate de învăţământ LICEUL „MATHIAS HAMMER“ ANINA Publică de interes naţional şi local 3 GRĂDINIŢA CU PROGRAM NORMAL NR.3 CENTRU ANINA ORAŞ ANINA URBAN VIRGIL BIROU 1 Arondată Unitate de învăţământ LICEUL „MATHIAS HAMMER“ ANINA Publică de interes naţional şi local 4 GRĂDINIŢA CU PROGRAM NORMAL NR.4 SIGISMUND ANINA ORAŞ ANINA URBAN REPUBLICII 38 Arondată Unitate de învăţământ LICEUL „MATHIAS HAMMER“ ANINA Publică de interes naţional şi local 5 GRĂDINIŢA CU PROGRAM NORMAL NR.5 STEIERDORF ANINA ORAŞ ANINA URBAN VICTORIEI 61 Arondată Unitate de învăţământ LICEUL „MATHIAS HAMMER“ ANINA Publică de interes naţional şi local 6 GRĂDINIŢA CU PROGRAM NORMAL NR.6 BRĂDET ANINA ORAŞ ANINA URBAN COL. BRĂDET 124 Arondată Unitate de învăţământ LICEUL „MATHIAS HAMMER“ ANINA Publică de interes naţional şi local 7 LICEUL „MATHIAS HAMMER“ ANINA ANINA ORAŞ ANINA URBAN MIHAIL SADOVEANU 1 Cu personalitate juridică Unitate de învăţământ Publică de interes naţional şi local 0255241302 0255241302 [email protected] 8 ŞCOALA GIMNAZIALĂ NR.1 CELNIC ANINA ORAŞ ANINA URBAN CHEILE GÂRLIŞTEI NR. 2 Arondată Unitate de învăţământ LICEUL „MATHIAS HAMMER“ ANINA Publică de interes naţional şi local 9 ŞCOALA GIMNAZIALĂ NR.2 STEIERDORF ANINA ORAŞ ANINA URBAN VICTORIEI 1 Arondată Unitate de învăţământ LICEUL „MATHIAS HAMMER“ ANINA Publică de interes naţional şi local 10 ŞCOALA GIMNAZIALĂ NR.3 BRĂDET ANINA ORAŞ ANINA URBAN COL.
- 
												  Assessing Public Perception on Protected Areas in Iron Gates Natural ParkAvailable online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Environmental Sciences 32 ( 2016 ) 70 – 79 International Conference – Environment at a Crossroads: SMART approaches for a sustainable future Assessing public perception on protected areas in Iron Gates Natural Park Cristiana Maria Ciocăneaa*, Carmen Sorescub, Mirela Ianoșib, Vasile Bagrinovschia aUniversity of Bucharest, Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, N. Bălcescu, no.1, Sector 1, Bucharest, 010041, Romania b Environmental Protection Agency Caras-Severin, Petru Maior, no.73, Resita, 320111, Romania Abstract Iron Gates Natural Park, situated in the south-western part of Romania is protected for its remarkable landscape, high biological diversity and unique habitats. The paper assesse the public perception on protected areas in Iron Gates Natural Park and explore perceptions of local residents and local authorities’ attitudes towards protected areas and conservation activities. Most respondents held a positive attitude towards protected areas and the analysis of their attitudes and perceptions revealed potential conflicts that might affect biodiversity conservation and protected area management. The main problems are the limited knowledge and a poor communication with authorities which implies a lack of local participation in conservation activities. Based on our studies, some recommendations are given for improvement of Iron Gates Natural Park management due to the importance of the local community involvement in conservation activities. ©© 2016 2016 The The Authors. Authors. Published Published by Elsevierby Elsevier B.V ThisB.V. is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (Peerhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-review under responsibility of the organizing). committee of ECOSMART 2015. Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of ECOSMART 2015 Keywords: protected area; protected area management; public perception; 1.
- 
												  Historical Background of the TrustTransylv. Rev. Syst. Ecol. Res. 16 ‒ special issue (2014), The “Iron Gates” Natural Park 211 SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DYNAMIC OF RURAL AND URBAN LANDSCAPES IDENTIFIED IN THE “IRON GATES” NATURAL PARK Mihăiţă-Iulian NICULAE *, Mihai Răzvan NIŢĂ *, Gabriel VANĂU *, Cristiana CIOCANEA * and Athanasios GAVRILIDIS * * University of Bucharest, Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, Nicolae Bălcescu Boulevard 1, Sector 1, CP 010041, Bucharest, Romania, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] DOI: 10.1515/trser-2015-0043 KEYWORDS: Rural and urban landscape, land use, land cover, landscape change, “Iron Gates” Natural Park, Romania. ABSTRACT In the present paper, we identified landscape typologies in the “Iron Gates” Natural Park from Romania and assessed their dynamic starting with 1990 to 2006. We evaluated the dynamic of landscapes based on land use and land covers changes as extracted from the Corine Land Cover databases. We found no major modifications in the distribution of landscapes, only 4.4% of the study area recording changes. Forestry landscapes have the highest ratio of change (on 1.5% from the total surface of the park), with significant decreases also recorded in landscapes of shrub and rare vegetation, as well as mixed agricultural landscapes. Among the active transformation processes, forestation (on 45% of the modified surface) and agricultural activities (20%) recorded the highest distribution. RÉSUMÉ: La dynamique spatiale et temporelle des paysages ruraux et urbains dans le Parc Naturel des “Portes de Fer”. L’article fait un inventaire des catégories de paysages qui se trouvent dans le Parc Naturel des “Portes de Fer” des Roumanie et analyse la dynamique de ces paysages de 1990 à 2006.
- 
												  Study on Surface Water Quality in Djerdap/Iron Gate Protected AreaSTUDY ON SURFACE WATER QUALITY IN DJERDAP/IRON GATE PROTECTED AREA Francisc Popescu, Milan Trumić, Ioan Laza, Bogdana Vujić, Virgil Stoica, Maja Trumić, Nada Štrbać, Ion Dragos Uţu, Milan Antonijević, Dorin Lelea, Carmen Rădescu, Snežana Đoševska The study is a result of “Academic Environmental Protection Studies on surface water quality in significant cross-border nature reservations Djerdap / Iron Gate national park and Carska Bara special nature reserve, with population awareness raising workshops”, financed thru the Interreg – IPA CBC Romania – Serbia Programme 2014 - 2020 Project acronym: AEPS Project eMS code: RORS-462 Project webpage: http://aeps.upt.ro TIMIŞOARA, 2021 ISBN 978-973-0-33702-0 Contents Acknowledgment .................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Danube. National Park Djerdap ....................................................................................................... 3 2. Danube. Iron Gates Natural Park .................................................................................................... 7 3. Danube’s main tributaries in National Park Djerdap – Iron Gate Natural park area .................... 14 3.1. Nera River .............................................................................................................................. 14 3.2. Berzasca River ........................................................................................................................ 18 3.3. Porecka River
- 
												  Historical Background of the TrustTransylv. Rev. Syst. Ecol. Res. 21.2 (2019), "The Wetlands Diversity" 49 MORPHOLOGY OF THE GENUS GYMNOCEPHALUS (PISCES) FROM THE LOWER DANUBE RIVER Cecilia ȘERBAN * and Gabriela GRIGORAŞ ** * “Dunărea de Jos” University, Domnească Street 111, RO-800201 Galați, Romania, [email protected] ** “Răsvan Angheluță” Museum Complex of Natural Sciences, Regiment 11 Siret Street, 6A, RO-800340 Galaţi, Romania, [email protected] DOI: 10.2478/trser-2019-0012 KEYWORDS: genus Gymnocephalus, phenotypic variability, morphometric, geometrics, lower Danube. ABSTRACT The current study completed the information regarding the phenotypic variability in the Danube ruffe (Gymnocephalus baloni). We also assessed the phylogenetic relationship of G. baloni with the other two species of the genus Gymnocephalus from the Lower Danube River. Ten morphological characters were the most useful together for discriminating between G. baloni and G. cernua from the Lower Danube River. In addition, we found a more streamlined body shape in G. baloni compared with the described holotype, which could be in connection with fish phenotypic response to ecological characteristics of the Lower Danube River. RESUMÉ: Morphologie du genre Gymnocephalus (Pisces) du cours inférieur du Danube. L’étude actuelle a complété l’information concernant la variabilité phénotypique de la ruffe du Danube (Gymnocephalus baloni). On a également évalué la relation phylogénétique de G. baloni avec les deux autres espèces du genre Gymnocephalus du cours inférieur du Danube. Dix caractères morphologiques ont été les plus utiles pour différencier G. baloni et G. cernua du cours inférieur du Danube. De même, on a trouvé une forme de corps plus hydrodynamique chez G. baloni par rapport à l’holotype décrit, ce qui pourrait être en rapport avec la réponse phénotypique des poissons aux caractéristiques écologiques du cours inférieur du Danube.
- 
												  Plan De Mobilitate Urbană Durabilă2017 Plan de Mobilitate Urbană Durabilă ORAȘ MOLDOVA NOUĂ Orașul Moldova Nouă PMUD 2017 Notă: Prezentul plan de mobilitate urbană durabilă se adresează Orașului Moldova Nouă și se referă la perioada 2017 – 2030. Planul de Mobilitate Urbana Durabilă este un document strategic, nivelul de detaliere a propunerilor (măsuri și proiecte) fiind adaptat în consecință. Astfel, în faza de implementare a PMUD vor fi necesare studii de fezabilitate privind investițiile propuse conform legislației în vigoare, inclusiv în ceea ce privește amplasamentul exact și soluția tehnică optimă, respectiv analiza impactului asupra mediului pentru proiectele relevante. Se recomandă actualizarea periodică a PMUD și a modelului de transport aferent, cel puțin o dată la 5 ani sau mai des, în funcție de evoluțiile viitoare în zona urbană a Orașului Moldova Nouă. 1 Orașul Moldova Nouă PMUD 2017 CUPRINS (1) P.M.U.D. – COMPONENTA DE NIVEL STRATEGIC (ETAPA I) ---------------------------------------------------------------- 9 1. INTRODUCERE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9 1.1. SCOPUL ȘI ROLUL DOCUMENTAȚIEI ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 1.2. ÎNCADRAREA ÎN PREVEDERILE DOCUMENTELOR DE PLANIFICARE SPAȚIALĂ --------------------------------- 13 1.2.1. STRATEGIA DE DEZVOLTARE TERITORIALĂ A ROMÂNIEI - SDTR ----------------------------------------------- 13 1.2.2. PLANUL DE AMENAJARE A TERITORIULUI NAȚIONAL - PATN ---------------------------------------------------
- 
												  Network for Sustainable Mobility Along the Danube SRTMP of IRONTransdanube.Pearls - Network for Sustainable Mobility along the Danube SRTMP of IRON GATES REGION - RO http://www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls WP4/Action 4.2 Trifanescu Rodica,Tudorache Doru, Radulescu Adrian v02/15.07.2018 SRTMP of IRON GATES REGION - RO Document Revision/Approval Version Date Status Date Status 01 15.07.2018 draft Contacts Coordinator: ERDF PP11 National Institute for Research and Development in Tourism Legal representative: Victor Timotin, PhD Email Address: [email protected] Web: www.incdt.ro Revision: (if applicable) More information about TRANSDANUBE.PEARLS and the project activities &results are available on: http://www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube- pearls 1 SRTMP of IRON GATES REGION - RO Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Structural data of the Pearl ........................................................................................................... 6 a. Transport infrastructure ................................................................................................................. 8 b. Tourism .......................................................................................................................................... 12 2. SWOT-analysis of the Iron Gates Pearl – RO ........................................................................ 18 3. Key stakeholders in the Pearl ...................................................................................................
- 
												  Sediile Birourilor Electorale De Circumscripție Din Județul Caraș-Severin Și Programul De Activitate Al AcestoraSEDIILE BIROURILOR ELECTORALE DE CIRCUMSCRIPȚIE DIN JUDEȚUL CARAȘ-SEVERIN ȘI PROGRAMUL DE ACTIVITATE AL ACESTORA Nr. Biroul electoral de Sediul biroului electoral de circumscripție Program de crt. circumscripţie activitate 1. Județeană nr.11 Caraș-Severin Sala Polivalentă 10 - 18 Municipiul Reşiţa, Piața 1 Decembrie 1918 nr. 5A, judeţul Caraş-Severin 2. Municipală nr.1 Reșița Sediul Serviciului Public ”Serviciul Voluntar pentru Situații de Urgență” 10 – 18 Municipiul Reşiţa, Piața Republicii nr. 17, județul Caraş-Severin 3. Municipală nr.2 Caransebeş Sediul Primăriei municipiului Caransebeş 9 - 17 Municipiul Caransebeș, str. Piața Revoluției nr. 1, județul Caraș-Severin 4. Orășenească nr.3 Anina Centrul de Afaceri Anina 9 - 17 Orașul Anina, str. Sfânta Varvara nr. 51, județul Caraș-Severin 5. Orășenească nr.4 Băile Herculane Sediul Primăriei orașului Băile Herculane, 10 - 18 Orașul Băile Herculane, str. Mihai Eminescu nr. 10, județul Caraş-Severin 6. Orășenească nr.5 Bocșa Sediul Primăriei orașului Bocșa – Sala de ședințe 10 - 18 Orașul Bocşa, str. 1 Decembrie 1918, nr. 22, județul Caraș-Severin 7. Orășenească nr.6 Moldova Nouă Sediul Primăriei orașului Moldova Nouă (sala de ședințe) 10 - 18 Orașul Moldova Nouă, str. Nicolae Bălcescu nr.26, et. 1, județul Caraş-Severin 8. Orășenească nr.7 Oraviţa Casa de Cultură ”George Motoia Craiu” 9 - 17 Orașul Oraviţa, str. Victoriei nr.75, județul Caraş-Severin 9. Orășenească nr.8 Oțelu Roșu Casa de Cultură a orașului Oțelu Roșu 10 - 18 Orașul Oţelu Roşu, str. 22 Decembrie 1989 nr.1, județul Caraş-Severin 10. Comunală nr.9 Armeniş Sediul Primăriei comunei Armeniş 9 - 17 Comuna Armeniş, sat Armeniș, nr.368, județul Caraş-Severin 11.
- 
												  Regulamentul Serviciului De Salubrizare Pentru Judetul Caras SeverinRegulamentul Serviciului de Salubrizare pentru Judetul Caras Severin REGULAMENTUL SERVICIULUI DE SALUBRIZARE PENTRU JUDETUL CARAS SEVERIN Martie 2014 1 Regulamentul Serviciului de Salubrizare pentru Judetul Caras Severin CUPRINS CAPITOLUL I DISPOZITII GENERALE................................................................4 SECTIUNEA 1 Domeniul de aplicare...................................................................4 SECTIUNEA 2 Accesul la serviciul de salubrizare ............................................11 SECTIUNEA 3 Documentatia tehnica............................................................... 11 SECTIUNEA 4 Indatoririle personalului operativ............................................. 14 CAPITOLUL II ASIGURAREA SERVICIULUI DE SALUBRIZARE SI CONDITII DE FUNCTIONARE .............................................................................16 SECTIUNEA 1 Precolectarea, colectarea si transportul deseurilor municipale, inclusiv ale deseurilor periculoase din deseurile menajere...........16 SECTIUNEA 2 Sortarea deseurilor municipale colectate separat..................... 25 SECTIUNEA 3 Organizarea prelucrarii, neutralizarii si valorificarii materiale si energetice a deseurilor.................................................................27 SECTIUNEA 4 Depozitarea controlata a deseurilor municipale .......................28 SECTIUNEA 5 Operarea depozitului conform de la Lupac................................ 30 SECTIUNEA 6 Colectarea, transportul, valorificarea si eliminarea deseurilor voluminoase .................................................................................33
- 
												  Transboundary Wetlands: Exploring Formal Mechanisms for CooperationAN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Zoe Rosenblum for the degree of Master of Science in Water Resources Policy and Management presented on December 15, 2020. Title: Transboundary Wetlands: Exploring Formal Mechanisms for Cooperation Abstract approved: ____________________________________________________ Susanne Schmeier Despite increased understanding of the benefits of wetlands, global wetland area continues to decrease. Wetlands are being lost at an alarming rate, and with them, biodiversity, floodwater storage, water purification, and countless other functions. There is little information available about mechanisms to manage transboundary wetlands. While the Ramsar Convention is one international mechanism for wetland governance, there are very few cases in which all riparian parties have jointly designated a Transboundary Ramsar Site. Most research on transboundary wetlands explores specific conflicts or management issues or argues for or against the Ramsar Convention as a legal tool to manage wetlands. However, little research explores institutions for managing transboundary wetlands. Furthermore, while there is much evidence that freshwater resources are a source of cooperation, there is emphasis on rivers and wetlands are largely absent from the discourse. This research employs document analysis, coding, and spatial analysis to explore how transboundary wetlands are managed. The products of this research are: a database of the world’s transboundary wetlands; an in-depth analysis of the management of the Wadden Sea, Okavango Delta, and