DOCSLIB.ORG

Intact Forest Landscapes of Northern European Russia the Situation As of April 2004, with Changes from 2000 Through 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intact Forest Landscapes of Northern European Russia the Situation As of April 2004, with Changes from 2000 Through 2004 Intact Forest Landscapes of Northern European Russia The situation as of April 2004, with changes from 2000 through 2004 Murmansk Kovdor NaryanMar Apatity Inta Usinsk Kostamuksha Kem Petchora Belomorsk Arkhangelsk Onega Ukhta Medvezhegorsk Plesetsk Petrozavodsk Syktyvkar Kargopol Vytegra Velsk Kotlas Krasnovishersk Saint Petersburg Veliky Ustjug Belozersk Solikamsk Novgorod Cherepovets Vologda Kudymkar Pskov Kirov Perm Kostroma Yaroslavl Intact forest landscapes (IFL) in Northern European Russia: Forest area Tver Ivanovo Naturally treeless area Ioshkar Ola Area of IFL lost due to fragmentation, logging and humancaused fires during the period 20002004 Nizhny Novgorod Other forest landscapes: Vladimir Forest area outside of intact forest landscapes MOSCOW Cheboksary Kazan Intact forest landscapes outside of Northern European Scale 1 : 4,600,000 Russia (status as of 2000) Smolensk Intact Forest Landscapes still intact). Their natural value and their poor accessibility used for a preliminary changedetection analysis. A more landscapes. In individual regions, the corresponding number for economic development make them prime candidates for detailed analysis was carried out using images of medium is: Arkhangelsk 23 percent, Komi 7 percent, Murmansk An intact forest landscape (IFL) is a large forest area that is becoming protected areas. This is particularly important to and high resolution from Landsat ETM (until 2002), 4 percent, Karelia 2 percent. Logging in intact forest land free from signs of human management or infrastructure, such consider in the southern and middle zones of the taiga, Meteor3M, Terra ASTER, IRS PAN, and IRS LISS. scapes is also taking place in regions of the Volga Federal as settlements, transportation corridors, agricultural fields where intact forest landscapes are disappearing at the most District: Perm 7 percent, Kirov 0.2 percent. No logging in or logging sites. An IFL may contain naturally treeless areas Threats to Intact Forest landscapes rapid rate. The forests within an IFL are natural ecosystems intact forest landscapes could be detected in the Vologda, such as lakes, wetlands and alpine meadows. An IFL is large that are only minimally affected by management. They are The area of intact forest landscapes has decreased during the Pskov and Novgorod regions, where the remaining intact enough to sustain viable populations of all organisms that therefore priority areas for conservation in accordance with period of study. The main cause of this loss is logging and forest landscapes consist mainly of peatlands. occur naturally in it, including large predators and species Articles 3 and 4 of the Russian Federal Act "On the associated construction of transportation infrastructure. Forest fires represent another threat. These occur in associ which are sensitive to changing conditions. It is sufficiently Protection of the Environment". The decrease has occurred in two ways: through direct ation with logging and establishment of new infrastructure. large to protect the core area and resist disturbances from transformation and through fragmentation. The latter hap In keeping with the method established by Global Forest outside (socalled edge effects), e.g. logging, colonization by Sources of Information pens when new roads cut off pieces of an intact forest land Watch Russia, these are classified as humancaused unless invasive species, poaching, etc. All areas shown as IFL on This map is based on the Atlas of Russia's Intact Forest scape from the main area. Most of the logging is in the form they occur inside of intact forest landscapes at some distance this map are at least 50,000 hectares in size and at least 10 Landscapes that was published in 2002 by a group of non from areas of human activity. kilometers wide (i.e. wide enough to fully contain a circle of clearcuts with a size of up to 50 hectares. Thinning and governmental environmental organizations cooperating in other forms of selective cutting occur with this diameter). Global Forest Watch Russia. A detailed description of the Reduction in area for individual tracts of intact forest landscapes from 2000 only rarely. through 2004 (shown as a percentage of the total initial area for each tract) The Importance of Intact Forest Landscapes research method is given in The Last Intact Forest The average annual area logged with Landscapes of Northern European Russia (Greenpeace and in intact forest landscapes during the < 0,5% The intact forest landscapes shown on this map are the last Global Forest Watch, 2000). study period was 19,700 hectares, remaining areas of wild forest landscapes in Europe. Each The map shows how the boundaries of intact forest land 0,5 1% Murmansk corresponding to an estimated vol IFL represents the accumulated result of spontaneous eco scapes have changed from the year 2000 to 2004. These region 3 1 3% logical processes that have occurred with minimal or no changes are the result of logging, road construction, and ume of 2.3 million m per year. Most Nenetsky autonomous human influence. An IFL is therefore an ecological point of associated fires, but some changes are also due to a higher of this logging occurred in the south 3 7% district reference a benchmark for understanding managed forest precision in the analysis, ern and middle zones of the taiga, landscapes and designing management schemes that pre made possible by the Contributing factors to the reduction while the logging intensity in the serve or restore significant aspects of the natural forest land appearance of new in extent of intact forest landscapes northern taiga was very low. The scape. The remaining tracts of IFL also have intrinsic value sources of information Fires in association with reduction in area was most rapid south as part of the Earth's natural endowment. Indeed, intact for infrastructure of the city of Kostamuksha 1.9 per (mainly highquality Karelia est landscapes should be regarded as areas of opportunity satellite images with cent per year, beween the rivers of Republic and responsibility, where all land use options from develop Logging 14.5% high resolution). Images of all Northern Dvina and Pinega 1.4 per 27.5% ment to conservation are still open. They are areas in which from the satellite Terra types cent per year, and on the Onega penin Komi Republic the best available knowledge and technology should be MODIS, showing the 58% sula 1.2 percent per year. Arkhangelsk applied to inform effective and responsible decisionmaking. situation for different In the Northwestern Federal region Intact forest landscapes are the least suitable for exploita years during early spring Fragmentation caused by logging District as a whole, 6 percent of all tion of all boreal forests (this is the very reason why they are (March or April), were and new infrastructure wood removed is from intact forest Vologda region Perm Global Forest Watch region Novgorod c/o WRI, 10 G Street, N.E. region Washington, DC 20002 USA Pskov Kirov Ph.: +1 (202) 729 7600 region region email: [email protected] R&D Center ScanEx 22/5 L’va Tolstogo str., Moscow, Russia, 119021 Greenpeace Russia GSP4, Moscow, Russia, 127994 www.globalforestwatch.org Ph.: +7 (095) 2462593 email: [email protected] www.scanex.ru Ph.: +7 (095) 2574116 email: [email protected] www.greenpeace.ru.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Industrialization of Housing Construction As a Tool for Sustainable Settlement and Rural Areas Development
    E3S Web of Conferences 164, 07010 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf /202016407010 TPACEE-2019 Industrialization of housing construction as a tool for sustainable settlement and rural areas development Olga Popova1,*, Polina Antufieva1 , Vladimir Grebenshchikov2 and Mariya Balmashnova2 1Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, 163002, Severnaya Dvina Emb., 17, Arkhangelsk, Russia 2 Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 26, Yaroslavskoeshosse, 129337, Moscow, Russia Abstract. The development of the construction industry, conducting construction in accordance with standard projects, and transforming the construction materials industry in hard-to-reach and sparsely populated areas will make significant progress in solving the housing problem. Industrialization of housing construction is a catalyst for strong growth of the region’s economy and the quality of life of citizens. The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology for assessing the level of industrialization of the territory’s construction complex and its development potential for increasing the volume of low-rise housing stock. Research tasks: 1) assessment of the need to develop housing construction, including low-rise housing, on a particular territory; 2) development of a methodology for calculating the level of industrialization of construction in the area under consideration to determine the possibility of developing low-rise housing construction in this area in the proposed way; 3) approbation of the method using the example of rural areas of the Arkhangelsk region. It was revealed that the districts of the Arkhangelsk region have medium and low levels of industrialization. The districts that are most in need of an increase in the rate of housing construction have been identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Forest Sector in the Arkhangelsk Oblast During the Transition Period of the 1990S
    Development of forest sector in the Arkhangelsk oblast during the transition period of the 1990s ALBINA PASHKEVICH Pashkevich Albina (2003). Development of forest sector in the Arkhangelsk oblast during the transition period of the 1990s. Fennia 181: 1, pp. 13–24. Helsinki. ISSN 0015-0010. The Arkhangelsk oblast has long been one of Russia’s most important forest industrial regions. This paper analyses the changes in accessibility of forest resources and forest commodity production during the transition period in the 1990s. Special attention is given to firm restructuring, active roles of domestic capital and the different survival strategies that have been developed by in- dustries in the region. Further analysis deals with signs of economic recovery in the forest sector due to the processes of restructuring, modernisation and self-organisation. Albina Pashkevich, Spatial Modelling Centre (SMC), Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå University, Box 839, SE-98128 Kiruna, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]. MS received 12 August 2002. Introduction adoption of a new. Some suggest that this proc- ess has been deeply embedded in the nature of The shift from central planning to a market-based the socialist system (Dingsdale 1999; Hamilton economy in Russia culminated with the dramatic 1999) and that the legacy of the communism has economic and political reorientation that began been only partly removed, and instead has mere- in the 1990s. This transition towards a market-ori- ly been reworked in a complex way (Smith 1997). ented and outward-looking economic system led Others say that reforms have actually ended the by private sector has created new challenges and old ‘command economy’ but have instead suc- opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Evaluation of Preservation and Growth of Spruce Climatypes Based on Long-Term Provenance Trials in Russia
    Folia Forestalia Polonica, series A, 2014, Vol. 56 (1), 56–67 REVIEW ARTICLE DOI: 10.2478/ffp-2014-0006 Comparative evaluation of preservation and growth of spruce climatypes based on long-term provenance trials in Russia Marina A. Nikolaeva1 , Danial Kh. Faizulin2, Alexander Ph. Potokin1, Oleg A. Jamaleev3 1 Saint-Petersburg State Forest Technical University named after S.M. Kirov, Institutsky per. 5, 194021, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: [email protected] 2 North Forestry Research Institute, St. Nikitova 13, 163062, Arkhangelsk, Russia 3 Branch of the Federal State Institution, Russian Centre of Forest Health, Leningrad Centre of Forest Health, Institutsky pr. 21, 194021, Saint-Petersburg, Russia AbstrAct The article presents the results of provenance trials carried on the Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.), the Sibe- rian spruce (Picea obovata Ledeb.) and hybrid forms of these two species. The trails were laid in 1977–1978 accord- ing to wide-scale All-Union program of 1972 year (Prokazin 1972) in the Arkhangelsk, Vologda, Leningrad regions and the Republic of Bashkortostan. The results of the most recent inventory of provenance trials as well as analyses of preservation and growth of spruce progenies with different geographical origin are presented. One of the main factors affecting spruce progeny survival was north-south distance between seed collection lo- cality and test locality. At the time of the study (2010–2012), in the Vologda and Arkhangelsk regions, spruce progeny preservation was higher in the case of mother stands distant to the north. On the contrary, in the Leningrad region and the Republic of Bashkortostan, preservation of northern climatypes’ progenies was lower during the whole period of plantations’ growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Transition in the Arkhangelsk Forest Sector
    International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis • A-2361 Laxenburg • Austria Tel: +43 2236 807 • Fax: +43 2236 71313 • E-mail: [email protected] • Web: www.iiasa.ac.at INTERIM REPORT IR-99-xxx/May Institutions and the Emergence of Markets - Transition in the Arkhangelsk Forest Sector Lars Carlsson ([email protected]) Nils-Gustav Lundgren ([email protected]) Mats-Olov Oisson ([email protected]) Mikhail Yu. Varakin ([email protected]) Approved by Sten Nilsson ([email protected]) Leader, Forest Resources Project Interim Reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis receive only limited review. Views or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Institute, its National Member Organizations, or other organizations supporting the work. Foreword With this report on the forest sector institutions in Arkhangelsk Oblast the second study in a series of case studies that IIASA has initiated in different regions of the Russian Federation is completed. The first study was conducted in Tomsk Oblast. That study was reported in Carlsson & Olsson, eds. 1998; Carlsson & Olsson, 1998; Carlsson, Lundgren & Olsson, 1999. Studies are currently being conducted in the Karelian Re- public as well as in the regions of Moscow, Murmansk, Krasnoyarsk, Irkutsk, and Kha- barovsk. All these studies deal with institutional aspects of the Russian forest sector. The research has been made possible through financial support from The Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research (FRN) and the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (KVA). A large number of people have provided valuable infor- mation and given useful comments on earlier drafts of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject of the Russian Federation)
    How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport and Infrastructural Basis of the Tourism Development Strategy in the Arkhangelsk Oblast © Aleksandr Yu
    Aleksandr Yu. TSVETKOV. Transport and infrastructural basis … 35 UDC [338.48+332.14](470.11)(045) DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.38.44 Transport and infrastructural basis of the tourism development strategy in the Arkhangelsk Oblast © Aleksandr Yu. TSVETKOV, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor E-mail: [email protected] Department of Management, Higher School of Economics, Management and Law, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Arkhangelsk, Russia Abstract. The article, devoted to the analysis of transport and geographical locations, describes possible strategies for the development of tourism in the Arkhangelsk Oblast. The main goal of the research was the development of logistic schemes of the transportation of tourists from the places of formation of tourist flows to the Arkhangelsk Oblast. The methodological basis of the article is to determine the economic dis- tances between potential tourist distribution centers and their places of interest in the area. Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Arkhangelsk were considered as the main towns of departure. Kargopol, Solvychegodsk, Kholmogory and Lomonosovo, Solovki, Kenozersky National Park, and Pinega caves are regarded as the main sites of tourist interest in the Arkhangelsk Oblast. It was determined that Kargopol is the most acces- sible for tourists, and Kenozersky National Park is the most recognizable by tourists but the least accessible. The object of world cultural heritage, the Monastery of the Transfiguration of the Saviour on Solovki is the most accessible for tourists from the territory of Karelia. It is recommended to optimize the schedule and to synchronize the work of transport for tourists to improve the transport accessibility of recreational facili- ties in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Tourism in the Arkhangelsk Area This Article Is Devoted to the Development and Functioning of the Regional Tourism Industry
    REGIONAL ECONOMY • The issue theme: TOURISM UDC 338.48(470.11) © V.E. Toskunina © N.N. Shpanova Development of tourism in the Arkhangelsk area This article is devoted to the development and functioning of the regional tourism industry. The main problem of inbound and domestic tourism, the tourism infrastructure state, supply and demand in the tourist market of the Arkhangelsk region are considered in the article. The assessment of historical and cultural factors in the development of regional tourism and regional promotion of tourist products is also given in the article. The tourism branch, regional tourism. Vera E. TOSKUNINA Doctor of Economics, Head of division, Arkhangelsk Scientific Center of the Ural RAS department Natalia N. SHPANOVA Chief searching authority of the Committee on Culture of the Arkhangelsk Region Modern tourism is actively growing sector become comfortable, interesting attracted not of many economies of the world. Despite its only Russians, but also flows of tourists from high tourist potential, Russia is far from ad- other countries. vanced positions on the global tourism market, Available in the Arkhangelsk region of creating mostly visiting flows. As a percentage unique natural complexes and picturesque of gross national product of tourism is less than landscapes with a rich and endemic flora one percent. The main constraint to the devel- and fauna, historical monuments and archi- opment of both domestic and inbound tourism tecture, as well as the culture heritage of the remained steady appreciation the value of travel Russian North can become the basis for the packages. The ratio of price and quality, and development of tourism industry region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy New Martyrs of Northern and Western Russia, Belorussia and the Baltic Introduction
    THE HOLY NEW MARTYRS OF NORTHERN AND WESTERN RUSSIA, BELORUSSIA AND THE BALTIC INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................3 1. HIEROMARTYR BARSANUPHIUS, BISHOP OF KIRILLOV ................................................5 2. HIEROMARTYR NICON, ARCHBISHOP OF VOLOGDA ....................................................9 3. HIEROMARTYR PLATO, BISHOP OF REVEL (TALLINN).................................................11 4. HIEROMARTYR EUGENE, BISHOP OF OLONETS .............................................................16 5. HIEROMARTYR BENJAMIN, METROPOLITAN OF PETROGRAD .................................17 6. HIEROMARTYR BARNABAS, ARCHBISHOP OF ARCHANGELSK ................................31 7. HIEROMARTYR JOSEPH, BISHOP OF VALDAI ..................................................................32 8. HIEROMARTYR HIEROTHEUS, BISHOP OF VELIKY USTIUG ........................................33 9. HIEROCONFESSOR EUTHYMIUS, BISHOP OF OLONETS ...............................................53 10. HIEROCONFESSOR NICHOLAS, BISHOP OF VELSK ......................................................54 11. HIEROMARTYR ANTHONY, ARCHBISHOP OF ARCHANGELSK..............................55 12. HIEROCONFESSOR MACARIUS, BISHOP OF CHEREPOVETS .....................................61 13. HIEROCONFESSOR BARSANUPHIUS, BISHOP OF KARGOPOL ..................................63 14. HIEROMARTYR JOHN, ARCHBISHOP OF RIGA..............................................................65
    [Show full text]
  • ISSN 2221—2698 Arkhangelsk 2015
    ISSN 2221—2698 Arkhangelsk 2015. N18 Arctic and North. 2015. N 18 2 ISSN 2221—2698 Arctic and North. 2015. N 18 Multidisciplinary internet scientific journal © Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, 2015 © Editorial board of the internet scientific journal “Arctic and North”, 2015 Published not less than four times per year The journal is registered at: Roskomnadzor as electronic periodical published in Russian and English. Registration certifi- cate of the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technologies and Mass Media El № FS77-42809 from November 26, 2010. The ISSN International Centre — world catalog of serials and ongoing resources. ISSN 2221— 2698, 23—24 March 2011. The system of Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI). License contract № 96-04/2011R from April 12, 2011. Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) — catalog of free access journals, 18.08.2013. The catalogs of international databases: EBSCO Publishing (USA) since December 2012; Global Se- rials Directory Ulrichsweb (USA) in October 2013. NSD — database of higher education in Norway (analog of Russian Higher Attestation Commis- sion) from February 2015. Founder — FSAEI HPE Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov. The editorial board staff of “Arctic and North” journal is published on the web site at: http://narfu.ru/aan/DOCS/redsovet.phpEditor-in-Chief — Yury Fedorovich Lukin, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Honorary Worker of the higher school of the Russian Federation. Multidisciplinary internet scientific journal publishes articles in which the Arctic and the North are research objects, specifically in the following fields of science: history, economics, social sciences; political science (geopolitics); ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Plesetsk Is Russia's "Other Cosmodrome" North of Moscow
    Russia’s Other Cosmodrome – Plesetsk James Oberg March 24, 2009 [Adapted and updated from a 1999 article] Plesetsk is Russia's "other cosmodrome" north of Moscow. Operated by the Strategic Rocket Forces (and later the ‘Space Forces’) as a military space base, Plesetsk has been the mainstay of routine space launchings in Russia for more than forty years. But its role in the future of the much-reduced Russian space program remains uncertain, mainly because so little is known about the base and its background. Of Russia's two main cosmodromes, Baykonur is by far the better known. Located in now-independent Kazakhstan, on a vast desert east of the Aral Sea, Baykonur is where Sputnik and Lunik and Vostok were launched fifty years ago. It is where the cosmonauts are launched from, where lunar and planetary probes blast off, where Western newsmen and tourists visit. It is the Russian "Cape Canaveral". But 850 km north of Moscow, deep in the Russian 'taiga' (the ancient pine and birch forests) is another rocket launch site, called Plesetsk. Even the name, derived from an old Slavonic word for a bend in a river, is difficult for foreign tongues to say. Studying this secret installation has been even more tortuous than trying to pronounce it. If Baykonur is in a foreign land, surrounded by very un-Russian geographical and cultural features, Plesetsk is deeply rooted in the true Russian historical experience and culture. And while Baykonur's future remains fragile, this foundation appears to give Plesetsk a solid basis for continued and even expanded space operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutions in the Arkhangelsk Region Participating in the Programme
    Institutions in the Arkhangelsk region participating in the programme “Children and Youth At Risk” № Institution Contact information CYAR programmes in Coordinators use 1. Severodvinsk social-rehabilitation centre Arkhangelsk region, Severodvinsk, Incredible Years Olga Sandulskaya for adolescents “Solnyshko” Yubileynaya strees, 13 Mediation Anna Tolstikova Head – Sergey Shuvalov Tlf: +7 (8184)58-84-90, 58-84-64 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://nordsun29.ru/ 2. Arkhangelsk centre for protection of Arkhangelsk, Troitskiy avenue, 96, build.2 Incredible Years Nadezhda Fefilova, children`s rights Elena Yudina, Anna Head – Olga Ilushina Izotova Tlf: +7(8182)21-43-49, 65-17-48 ART Aggression Irina Zvjagina E-mail: [email protected] Replacement Training Web: http://www.pravadetstva.ru/ 3 Municipal centre for expertise, Arkhangelsk, Severnaja Dvina embankment, Incredible Years monitoring, psychologic, pedagogic and 84 information-methodological help “Leda” Ludmila Yakovleva Head – Valentina Bedrina ART Aggression Replacement Training Tlf: +7(8182)28-56-96 ( тел ./ факс ) E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://leda29.ru/ 4. Arkhangelsk Kindergarten № 113 Arkhangelsk, Incredible Years Yanina Sipovich «Veterok» Kotlasskaya street, 6-1 Head – Inga Tomilova Tlf: +7(8182)20-27-93 E-mail: [email protected] Web http://veterok113.edusite.ru/ Institutions in the Arkhangelsk region participating in the programme “Children and Youth At Risk” 5. Arkhangelsk centre for child Arkhangelsk, Nikolskiy avenue, 88-1 Incredible Years Tatyana Panina development – kindergarten № 140 “Tvorchestvo” Head - Svetlana Azhgikhina Tlf: +7(8182)22-01-40 / +7(8182)22-58-72 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://dsad140.1mcg.ru/ 6. Arkhangelsk kindergarten of the Arkhangelsk, Incredible Years Irina Sofjina combined type № 172 "Kljukovka" Leningradskiy avenue, 269-2 Svetlana Lysenkova Natalya Vagina Head – Irina Korelskaya Tlf/Fax: +7(8182)62-88-54 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://mdoy172.ucoz.ru/ 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Entries in the Barents Encyclopedia (By Topic Category)
    Entries in the Barents Encyclopedia (by topic category) The list is divided into the following six sections: A. 118 submitted articles (as of 20 April 2011) (p. 4) B. 169 entries for which we have contracted authors (p. 18) C. 67 entries for which we have suggested or invited (but not contracted) authors (p. 39) D. 55 entries for which we have no suggested authors (p. 51) E. 113 suggested entries that might be included if space allows (p. 57) F. 158 suggested entries that are not likely to be included (p. 67) Note: As of April 20, 2011, we have 409 entries/articles to be included in the Barents Encyclopedia! Thus, we do not need any more new entry suggestions unless this is required for reasons of “balance” or serious omissions! Column contents In column “S” the status of the entry word is indicated (for labels, see top of p. 4). In column “E” the suggested entry word is stated. In column “Enc” the a cronym for the encyclopedia where the entry was found (see listing below) or the name of the person suggesting the entry is listed. In column “T” the “topics category” to which the suggested entry belongs (see category codes 1–12 below); In column “T alt” an alternative topic classification is given. In column “L” the suggested Length of entry is stated. (For labels of the different types of entries identified, see table below!) In column “A” the name (and affiliation/email address) of the suggested author is listed. In column “C” you may enter comments about the suggested entry.
    [Show full text]