DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Solid Waste Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 Solid Waste Management Plan 2019 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN Montgomery County Solid Waste Management District Ratified January 2019 Written by 416 Longshore Drive Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105 1-800-517-9634 1-734-996-1361 This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................................ i Glossary ......................................................................................................................................................................... v i Solid Waste Management District Information ........................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 5 A. Brief Introduction to Solid Waste Planning in Ohio ....................................................................................... 5 B. Requirements of County and Joint Solid Waste Management Districts ........................................................ 5 C. District Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 6 D. Waste Reduction and Recycling Goals ........................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2: District Profile .............................................................................................................................................. 9 A. Profile of Political Jurisdictions ...................................................................................................................... 9 B. Population ................................................................................................................................................... 11 C. Profile of Commercial and Institutional Sector ............................................................................................ 12 D. Profile of Industrial Sector ........................................................................................................................... 13 E. Other Characteristics ................................................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 3: Waste Generation ...................................................................................................................................... 15 A. Solid Waste Generated in Reference Year ................................................................................................... 15 B. Historical Waste Generated ......................................................................................................................... 17 C. Waste Generation Projections ..................................................................................................................... 17 Chapter 4: Waste Management .................................................................................................................................. 19 A. Waste Management Overview .................................................................................................................... 19 B. Profile of Waste Management Infrastructure ............................................................................................. 20 C. Solid Waste Facilities Used in the Reference Year ....................................................................................... 21 D. Use of Solid Waste Facilities During the Planning Period ............................................................................ 24 E. Siting Strategy .............................................................................................................................................. 24 F. Designation .................................................................................................................................................. 25 Chapter 5: Waste Reduction and Recycling ................................................................................................................. 27 A. Solid Waste Management District Priorities ................................................................................................ 27 B. Program Descriptions .................................................................................................................................. 28 C. Waste Reduction and Recycling Rates ......................................................................................................... 32 Chapter 6: Budget ........................................................................................................................................................ 35 A. Overview of the SWMD’s Budget ................................................................................................................ 35 B. Revenue ....................................................................................................................................................... 36 C. Expenses ...................................................................................................................................................... 38 D. Budget Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 40 Appendix A: Miscellaneous Information ....................................................................................................................... 1 A. Reference Year ............................................................................................................................................... 1 B. Planning Period .............................................................................................................................................. 1 C. Goal Statement .............................................................................................................................................. 1 D. Explanations of differences between data previously reported and data used in the solid waste management plan .......................................................................................................................................... 1 E. Material Change in Circumstances/Contingencies ........................................................................................ 2 Appendix B: Recycling Infrastructure Inventory ............................................................................................................ 1 Montgomery County 2019 Solid Waste Management Plan i January 2019 Ratified A. Curbside Recycling Services, Drop-Off Recycling Locations, and Mixed Solid Waste Materials Recovery Facilities ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 B. Curbside Recycling and Trash Collection Service Providers ........................................................................... 6 C. Composting Facilities ..................................................................................................................................... 6 D. Other Food Waste and Yard Waste Management Programs ........................................................................ 8 E. Material Handling Facilities Used by the SWMD in the Reference Year ....................................................... 8 Appendix C: Population Data ......................................................................................................................................... 1 A. Reference Year Population ............................................................................................................................ 1 B. Population Projections .................................................................................................................................. 1 Appendix D: Disposal Data ............................................................................................................................................ 1 A. Reference Year Waste Disposed .................................................................................................................... 1 B. Historical Waste Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 4 C. Disposal Projections ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Appendix E: Residential/Commercial Reduction and Recycling Data ........................................................................... 1 A. Reference Year Recovery Data ...................................................................................................................... 1 B. Historical Recovery ........................................................................................................................................ 7 C. Residential/Commercial Recovery Projections ............................................................................................ 10 Appendix F: Industrial Waste Reduction and Recycling Data ....................................................................................... 1 A. Reference Year Recovery Data
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Waste Technologies: Waste to Energy Facilities
    WASTE TECHNOLOGIES: WASTE TO ENERGY FACILITIES A Report for the Strategic Waste Infrastructure Planning (SWIP) Working Group Complied by WSP Environmental Ltd for the Government of Western Australia, Department of Environment and Conservation May 2013 Quality Management Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Date May 2013 Prepared by Kevin Whiting, Steven Wood and Mick Fanning Signature Checked by Matthew Venn Signature Authorised by Kevin Whiting Signature Project number 00038022 Report number File reference Project number: 00038022 Dated: May 2013 2 Revised: Waste Technologies: Waste to Energy Facilities A Report for the Strategic Waste Infrastructure Planning (SWIP) Working Group, commissioned by the Government of Western Australia, Department of Environment and Conservation. May 2013 Client Waste Management Branch Department of Environment and Conservation Level 4 The Atrium, 168 St George’s Terrace, PERTH, WA 6000 Locked Bag 104 Bentley DC WA 6983 Consultants Kevin Whiting Head of Energy-from-Waste & Biomass Tel: +44 207 7314 4647 [email protected] Mick Fanning Associate Consultant Tel: +44 207 7314 5883 [email protected] Steven Wood Principal Consultant Tel: +44 121 3524768 [email protected] Registered Address WSP Environmental Limited 01152332 WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF 3 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................. 6 1.1 Objectives ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rates 2017.Xlsx
    Facilities with Scales - Schedule of Charges March 2017 Description Charges GENERAL Basic Gate Fee $50 per ton Minimum Gate Fee Charge for Waste $5.00 Recyclable Materials Drop Off No Charge TYPE OF MATERIAL HOUSEHOLD TRASH Up to 200 lbs. minimum Gate Fee $5.00 $0.50 each additional 20 lb. increment or fraction CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION (C&D) C&D with no concrete, recyclables, green waste or chipable wood $50 per ton minimum $5.00 Separated Concrete $25 per ton minimum $5.00 Separated chipable wood $25 per ton minimum $5.00 Mixed C&D (household trash, recyclables, green waste and/or concrete in the load) $175 per ton minimum $5.00 GREEN WASTE Lawn Clippings/Leaves, Up to 400lbs. Minimum Gate Fee $5.00 yard waste, brush, shrubs, $.0.50 each additional 40lb. Increment or fraction trees, branches, woodchips. Tree Stumps $4.00 less than 24" plus Gate Fee $5.00 $12.00 greater than 24" plus Gate Fee $5.00 Mixed Debris (Green waste, household trash,recyclables and/or concrete in the load) $175 per ton minimum $5.00 ANIMALS Small (less than 25 lbs.) $5.00 each + $5.00 Gate Fee Medium (25-200 lbs.) $10.00 each + $5.00 Gate Fee Large (more than 200lbs.) $30.00 each + $5.00 Gate Fee FURNITURE $5.00 minimum Gate Fee plus $4.00 per item ELECTRONIC WASTE No Charge UNIVERSAL WASTE No Charge RESIDENTIAL HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE No Charge COMMERCIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE Not accepted SEPTAGE Inyo $65.00 first 3,000 gallons $42.00 per additional 1,000 gallons or increment Out of County $130.00 first $3,000 gallons $84.00 per addional 1,000 gallons or increment Facilities with Scales - Schedule of Charges March 2017 Description Charges TIRES Auto & light truck $4.00 for 19" rim or less + $5.00 Gate Fee $8.00 for 20" - 24.5" rim + $5.00 Gate Fee Tractor/Heavy Equipment Tire $30 For Up to 100 lbs + $5.00 Gate Fee $40 over 100 lbs.
    [Show full text]
  • 00 Gate Fee Schedule
    EFFECTIVE Nov. 17, 2020 GATE FEE SUMMARY Walker Transfer Station / Lanfill Mono County Solid Waste Program *All prices for waste that must be transported off-site include a $20/ton Transportation Surcharge GREEN ITALICIZED TEXT = RECYCLED MATERIAL Category / Item Description Unit Cost Minimum Gate Fee ....................................................................................................................... $5.00 per load Household and Commercial Waste. “First” Garbage Can(s) (up to 82 gallons, or any portion thereof) .................................................. $5.00 Additional Cans (up to 41 gallons each, or any portion thereof) ............................................. $2.50 Mixed Waste, Generally ......................................................................................................... $11.75 per cu. yd. Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste Mixed Building C&D Debris -- 2 CUBIC YARD DAILY LIMIT (painted wood, furniture, drywall, insulation, plumbing fixtures, mattresses, cementitious building products, carpet, other misc. bldg. debris) ..................................................................................................................... $16.50 per cu. yd. Recyclable Building C&D Debris (un-painted lumber, engineered wood products) …$5.00 per cu. yd. Wood, Green Waste, and Similar Organics. Organics8 (clean loads of bark, hay, grass clippings, sod, tumbleweeds) ............................... $5.00 per load Wood (clean loads of prunings, brush, tree limbs and trunks less than 18”
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Opportunities, Barriers, and Enablers For
    resources Article Understanding the Opportunities, Barriers, and Enablers for the Commercialization and Transfer of Technologies for Mine Waste Valorization: A Case Study of Coal Processing Wastes in South Africa Helene-Marie Stander 1,2,* and Jennifer L. Broadhurst 1 1 Minerals to Metals Research Initiative, Department of Chemical Engineering, Upper Campus, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700 Cape Town, South Africa; [email protected] 2 Centre for Bioprocess Engineering Research, Department of Chemical Engineering, Upper Campus, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700 Cape Town, South Africa * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The mining and minerals beneficiation industries produce large volumes of waste, the land disposal of which can lead to harmful environmental emissions and a loss of valuable resources. Glob- ally, researchers are developing technologies for recovering valuable minerals and converting mine waste into a resource with market value. However, university-developed technological innovations to long-term environmental problems can be difficult to transfer to the mining industry. This paper focuses on the barriers and enablers to technology transfer in the South African mining industry using the valorization of coal processing waste as a case study. Data and information derived from interviews with relevant experts and published literature were used to gain a better understanding Citation: Stander,H.-M.; Broadhurst, J.L. of the landscape of waste valorization technology implementation. Results indicated that financial Understanding the Opportunities, Barriers, and Enablers for the considerations and demonstration of technical feasibility will be vital in determining the success of Commercialization and Transfer of technology transfer, as will a changing perception of waste and its value within the sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14 the Economics of Marine Litter
    Chapter 14 The Economics of Marine Litter Stephanie Newman, Emma Watkins, Andrew Farmer, Patrick ten Brink and Jean-Pierre Schweitzer Abstract This chapter aims to provide an overview of research into quantifying the economic impacts of marine litter. From an environmental economics perspec- tive it introduces the difficulties in measuring the economic costs of marine litter; reviews those sectors where these costs are notable; and considers policy instru- ments, which can reduce these costs. Marine litter is underpinned by dynamic and complex processes, the drivers and impacts of which are multi-scalar, trans- boundary, and play out in both marine and terrestrial environments. These impacts include economic costs to expenditure, welfare and lost revenue. In most cases, these are not borne by the producers or the polluters. In industries such as fisher- ies and tourism the costs of marine litter are beginning to be quantified and are considerable. In other areas such as impacts on human health, or more intangible costs related to reduced ecosystem services, more research is evidently needed. As the costs of marine litter are most often used to cover removing debris or recov- ering from the damage which they have caused, this expenditure represents treat- ment rather than cure, and although probably cheaper than inaction do not present a strategy for cost reduction. Economic instruments, such as taxes and charges addressing the drivers of waste, for instance those being developed for plastic bags, could be used to reduce the production of marine litter and minimise its impacts. In any case, there remain big gaps in our understanding of the harm caused by marine litter, which presents difficulties when attempting to both quantify its economic costs, and develop effective and efficient instruments to reduce them.
    [Show full text]
  • Dayton Dragons 2014 Media Guide
    DAYTON DRAGONS 2014 MEDIA GUIDE Nick Travieso Reds #1 Draft Pick, 2012 20142014 DDAYTONAYTON DDRAGONSRAGONS MMEDIAEDIA GGUIDEUIDE Table of Contents Front Office and Ownership Info Cincinnati Reds Front Office Info 2 Front Office Staff 88 Dragons Honors 3 Field Staff and Player Development 89 Fifth Third Field 4 2013 Draft Selections 90 Mandalay Baseball 5 Reds 2013 Minor League Player/Year 91 Mandalay Baseball Teams 6 Reds 2013 Organizational Leaders 93 2014 Reds Minor League Affiliates 94 2014 Dayton Dragons Field Staff 8 Miscellaneous & Media Information Player Bios 11 Dragons Medical Staff 99 2013 Dayton Dragons Review Dragons Media Relations 100 Season Review 20 and Media Outlets Opening Day Roster 22 MWL Telephone Directory 101 Transactions 23 Dragons “On the Air” 102 Statistics 24 2014 Media Regulations 103 Season-Highs, Misc. Stats 26 2014 Pre-Game Schedule and Ground 104 Game-by-Game 28 Rules Batter/Pitcher of the Month 30 Dragons Year-by-Year, All-Stars 31 Dayton Dragons Franchise Records All-Time Regular Season 32 Dragons Season Team Records 33 Dragons Single Game Team Records 34 Dragons Individual Game Records 35 Dragons Individual Season Records 36 Dragons Career Records 38 Dragons Year-by-Year Team Statistics 40 Dragons All-Time Roster 53 All-Time Managers, Coaches 56 All-Time Opening Day Lineups 57 Baseball America Top Prospect Lists 58 Dragons MLB Debuts 59 Midwest League/Minor Leagues General Information 62 MWL Team Pages 63 2013 Midwest League Recap 78 Midwest League Mileage Chart 83 Hotel Information 84 Minor League Baseball Directory 86 “The Streak,” Attendance Leaders 87 Jay Bruce The 2014 Dayton Dragons Media Guide was produced by the Dayton Dragons Media Relations Department and its entire contents are copyrighted by Dayton Dragons Professional Baseball, LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Recovery from Sewage Sludge: the Case Study of Croatia
    energies Article Energy Recovery from Sewage Sludge: The Case Study of Croatia Dinko Đurđevi´c 1,* , Paolo Blecich 2 and Željko Juri´c 1 1 Energy Institute Hrvoje Požar, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 26 April 2019; Accepted: 16 May 2019; Published: 20 May 2019 Abstract: Croatia produced 21,366 tonnes of dry matter (DM) sewage sludge (SS) in 2016, a quantity expected to surpass 100,000 tonnes DM by 2024. Annual production rates for future wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) in Croatia are estimated at 5.8–7.3 Nm3/people equivalent (PE) for biogas and 20–25 kgDM/PE of sewage sludge. Biogas can be converted into 12–16 kWhel/PE of electricity and 19–24 kWhth/PE of heat, which is sufficient for 30–40% of electrical and 80–100% of thermal autonomy. The WWTP autonomy can be increased using energy recovery from sewage sludge incineration by 60% for electricity and 100% of thermal energy (10–13 kWhel/PE and 30–38 kWhth/PE). However, energy for sewage sludge drying exceeds energy recovery, unless solar drying is performed. 2 The annual solar drying potential is estimated between 450–750 kgDM/m of solar drying surface. The lower heating value of dried sewage sludge is 2–3 kWh/kgDM and this energy can be used for assisting sludge drying or for energy generation and supply to WWTPs. Sewage sludge can be considered a renewable energy source and its incineration generates substantially lower greenhouse gases emissions than energy generation from fossil fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • City Manager Discusses Recreation Options, Future Plans
    www.oakwoodregister.com City manager discusses recreation options, future plans By Lance Winkler two newly elected members of the mendations from the 25-member Two separate venues in minton, wrestling, etc.. Restrooms Monday morning was spent in Oakwood City Council. committee. Oakwood are under consideration and a concession area would also fruitful discussion with Oakwood A farewell reception is planned “There are a lot of things to con- for providing sports and recre- be included. City Manager Norbert Klopsch for outgoing Oakwood Mayor Judy sider. Interestingly, the challenge ation facilities for Oakwood citi- According to Klopsch, the discussing upcoming plans and Cook on Monday, Jan. 25 at the before us is that the responses were zens – the Oakwood Community committee is about “halfway done priorities for Oakwood in the Oakwood Community Center from all across the board,” Klopsch said. Center and Old River. According with the Master Plan phase.” Next year 2010. Major projects for the 4 to 7 p.m. Presentations honoring “For example, Oakwood Sports to Klopsch, the OCC is the pre- on the agenda is a random phone city in 2010 include the Pointe her will be given at 5:30 p.m. Director Mark Hughes pointed out ferred location for programs: chil- survey of 300 to 400 Oakwood Oakwood/Sugar Camp develop- The Pointe Oakwood residen- that among the student body at dren, adults and seniors; the Old homes to be conducted in February ment, the Athletic/Recreational tial development will see a large OHS, over 200 student participate River locale is under consider- and March.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Anaerobic Digestion for Municipal Solid Waste
    Global Methane Initiative Overview of Anaerobic Digestion for Municipal Solid Waste Updated: October 2016 1 About This Presentation . Introduces the process of anaerobic digestion (AD) for municipal solid waste (MSW) . Provides an overview of anaerobic digestion microbiology . Helps you understand how you might benefit from AD . Guides you through the key areas to consider when developing an AD project . Reviews the status of AD globally and provides selected case studies Using Bookmarks to Navigate This presentation contains bookmarks to help you navigate. Using the panel on the left, click the bookmark to jump to the slide. For Chrome users, the bookmarks can be viewed by clicking on the bookmark icon ( ) at the top right of the screen. 2 Global Methane Initiative GMI is a voluntary, multilateral partnership that aims to reduce global methane emissions and to advance the abatement, recovery and use of methane as a valuable clean energy source. OBJECTIVES BENEFITS . Reduce anthropogenic methane . Decline in methane concentrations emissions and advance the and methane utilization will result recovery and use of methane in: while: – Sustainability – Enhancing economic growth – Energy security – Promoting energy security – Health and safety – Improving local air quality – Profitability and public health. 3 GMI Partners . Grew from 14 to 42 Partner governments, plus the European Commission . Accounts for nearly 70% of global anthropogenic methane emissions 4 Main Menu 1. Introduction – what is AD and why should it interest me? Click here for an introduction to AD 2. Is AD suitable for me? Click here for more info about the potential for AD 3. Step-by-step guide Click here for detailed information about the key issues to consider when developing an AD project 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Biowaste Management in Europe Results of a Pre-Feasibility Report for a Facility for Organic Waste Recycling in South Backa Waste Management District - Serbia
    Biowaste Management in Europe Results of a Pre-feasibility report for a facility for organic waste recycling in South Backa Waste Management District - Serbia Marco Ricci - Jürgensen Altereko sas on behalf Abt associates About myself • 20 years of experience in planning MSW management, designing and up¬grading of collection and transport schemes, assessing recycling facilities (focus on composting), planning comunication and participation initiatives, chairing multi-linguistic, multi-tasking working groups or projects. • 15 year foreign working experience as consulting expert focusing on issues related to solid waste management. Extensive consultancy experience in the Solid Waste Sector – on Strategy and Policy, Fees&Taxes, Separate collection schemes - , both in ´advanced´ and ´low to middle income’ countries in Europe, Latin America and Asia. • 10 years experience cooperating with international organisation/agencies (as ECN-European Compost Network, ACRR, EEA- European Environment Agency, Sweepnet-GIZ, SCOW). About myself About myself CIC Italian Composting and Biogas Association Senior Expert www.compost.it ISWA International Solid Waste Association Chair of the Working Group on Biological Treatment of Waste www.iswa.org Ecomondo International Fair Ambassador en.ecomondo.com Activities (outside Italy) Bulgaria Czech Republic Slovak Republic UK Spain Tunisia/Sweep-Net Brazil Cambodia Chile Overview • What is biowaste? • Biological treatment options • From City Assessment to Pre-feasibility investigations • South Backa WMR – scenarios
    [Show full text]
  • PBATS Directory 4.3.18.Xlsx
    Arizona Diamondbacks Salt River Fields 7555 N. Pima Rd. Scottsdale, AZ 85258 Minor League Medical Coordinator Assistant Medical Coordinator Kyle Torgerson Ryne Eubanks E-mail [email protected] E-mail [email protected] Office 480-270-5864 Office 480-270-5863 Mobile 206-799-3584 Mobile 901-270-5251 Fax 480-270-5825 Minor League Physical Therapist ML/MiL Medical Administrative Asst. Max Esposito Jon Herzner E-mail [email protected] E-mail [email protected] Office 480-270-5863 Office 480-270-5863 Mobile 603-380-6345 Mobile 520-444-3154 Latin American Medical Coordinator Spencer Ryan, ATC E-mail [email protected] Mobile 801-473-2006 Minor League Athletic Training Staff AAA - Reno Aces AA - Jackson Generals Paul Porter Joe Rosauer E-mail [email protected] E-mail [email protected] Office 775-334-7034 Office 251-445-2028 Mobile 734-272-3656 Mobile 319-415-7891 A Adv - Visalia Rawhide A - Kane County Cougars Chris Schepel Kelly Boyce E-mail [email protected] E-mail [email protected] Office 559-622-9197 Office 630-578-6254 Mobile 616-566-5486 Mobile 815-560-2716 SS A - Hillsboro Hops R - Missoula Osprey Michael Powell Damon Reel E-mail [email protected] E-mail [email protected] Office 509-452-1849 Office 406-327-0886 Mobile 412-596-4639 Mobile 765-480-5622 R - AZL Diamondbacks R - DSL Diamondbacks Adam Brewer, ATC E-mail E-mail [email protected] Mobile Mobile 607-661-6221 R - DSL Diamondbacks Carlos Perez E-mail [email protected] Mobile 809-781-1101 Atlanta Braves mailing: P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Transfer Stations: a Manual for Decision-Making Acknowledgments
    Waste Transfer Stations: A Manual for Decision-Making Acknowledgments he Office of Solid Waste (OSW) would like to acknowledge and thank the members of the Solid Waste Association of North America Focus Group and the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council Waste Transfer Station Working Group for reviewing and providing comments on this draft document. We would also like to thank Keith Gordon of Weaver Boos & Gordon, Inc., for providing a technical Treview and donating several of the photographs included in this document. Acknowledgements i Contents Acknowledgments. i Introduction . 1 What Are Waste Transfer Stations?. 1 Why Are Waste Transfer Stations Needed?. 2 Why Use Waste Transfer Stations? . 3 Is a Transfer Station Right for Your Community? . 4 Planning and Siting a Transfer Station. 7 Types of Waste Accepted . 7 Unacceptable Wastes . 7 Public Versus Commercial Use . 8 Determining Transfer Station Size and Capacity . 8 Number and Sizing of Transfer Stations . 10 Future Expansion . 11 Site Selection . 11 Environmental Justice Considerations . 11 The Siting Process and Public Involvement . 11 Siting Criteria. 14 Exclusionary Siting Criteria . 14 Technical Siting Criteria. 15 Developing Community-Specific Criteria . 17 Applying the Committee’s Criteria . 18 Host Community Agreements. 18 Transfer Station Design and Operation . 21 Transfer Station Design . 21 How Will the Transfer Station Be Used? . 21 Site Design Plan . 21 Main Transfer Area Design. 22 Types of Vehicles That Use a Transfer Station . 23 Transfer Technology . 25 Transfer Station Operations. 27 Operations and Maintenance Plans. 27 Facility Operating Hours . 32 Interacting With the Public . 33 Waste Screening . 33 Emergency Situations . 34 Recordkeeping. 35 Environmental Issues.
    [Show full text]