Mitochondrial Genome in Hypsizygus Marmoreus and Its Evolution In
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Major Clades of Agaricales: a Multilocus Phylogenetic Overview
Mycologia, 98(6), 2006, pp. 982–995. # 2006 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview P. Brandon Matheny1 Duur K. Aanen Judd M. Curtis Laboratory of Genetics, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD, Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Wageningen, The Netherlands Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610 Matthew DeNitis Vale´rie Hofstetter 127 Harrington Way, Worcester, Massachusetts 01604 Department of Biology, Box 90338, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 Graciela M. Daniele Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biologı´a Vegetal, M. Catherine Aime CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Co´rdoba, Casilla USDA-ARS, Systematic Botany and Mycology de Correo 495, 5000 Co´rdoba, Argentina Laboratory, Room 304, Building 011A, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350 Dennis E. Desjardin Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, Jean-Marc Moncalvo San Francisco, California 94132 Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Royal Ontario Museum and Department of Botany, University Bradley R. Kropp of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2C6 Canada Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 Zai-Wei Ge Zhu-Liang Yang Lorelei L. Norvell Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Pacific Northwest Mycology Service, 6720 NW Skyline Sciences, Kunming 650204, P.R. China Boulevard, Portland, Oregon 97229-1309 Jason C. Slot Andrew Parker Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, 127 Raven Way, Metaline Falls, Washington 99153- Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609 9720 Joseph F. Ammirati Else C. Vellinga University of Washington, Biology Department, Box Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, 111 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 Koshland Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3102 Timothy J. -
Australia's Fungi Mapping Scheme
November 2008 AUSTRALIA’S FUNGI MAPPING SCHEME Inside this Edition: th News from the Fungimap Co-ordinator by This is our 5 Fungimap Conference and we Lee Speedy..................................................1 have organised a great programme of Contacting Fungimap ..................................2 speakers from across Australia and covering From the Editor, Instructions for authors ....3 very diverse fungi topics. In this newsletter Collating information on fungi in Australian we have included a Questionnaire, to policy & strategy documents by T May …..3 discover which Workshop topics you would Yellow/orange Amanitas by Sapphire most like to see (your Top 5 topics). Please McMullan-Fisher……………………...…..4 return this along with your Registration form Mycoacia subceracea by Barbara Paulus ....7 and we will adapt our list of Workshops New additions in W.A.'s Flora Conservation where possible. codes by Neale Bougher..............................8 New Fungimap target species....................13 At previous Conferences, transportation and Fungimap survey on Kangaroo Island by distribution of microscopes have been Paul George ..............................................13 challenging and so we have decided to add a Fungi-mapping in Ivanhoe, Melbourne by truly unique one day Masterclass with Robert Bender ..........................................15 microscopes in Sydney, to run at the UNSW, Phallus merulinus in the top end by Matt just after our Conference. This will be on the Barrett & Ben Stuckey ..............................16 topic of Disc Fungi and led by Dr. Peter Exhibition Review: In Plain View by Sarah Johnston from New Zealand. Places for this Lloyd .........................................................16 workshop will be strictly limited. Fungal News: PUBF 2008.........................17 Fungal News: SA, SEQ - QMS.................18 In early October, I accompanied Dr. -
2 the Numbers Behind Mushroom Biodiversity
15 2 The Numbers Behind Mushroom Biodiversity Anabela Martins Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, School of Agriculture (IPB-ESA), Portugal 2.1 Origin and Diversity of Fungi Fungi are difficult to preserve and fossilize and due to the poor preservation of most fungal structures, it has been difficult to interpret the fossil record of fungi. Hyphae, the vegetative bodies of fungi, bear few distinctive morphological characteristicss, and organisms as diverse as cyanobacteria, eukaryotic algal groups, and oomycetes can easily be mistaken for them (Taylor & Taylor 1993). Fossils provide minimum ages for divergences and genetic lineages can be much older than even the oldest fossil representative found. According to Berbee and Taylor (2010), molecular clocks (conversion of molecular changes into geological time) calibrated by fossils are the only available tools to estimate timing of evolutionary events in fossil‐poor groups, such as fungi. The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiotic fungi from the division Glomeromycota, gen- erally accepted as the phylogenetic sister clade to the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, have left the most ancient fossils in the Rhynie Chert of Aberdeenshire in the north of Scotland (400 million years old). The Glomeromycota and several other fungi have been found associated with the preserved tissues of early vascular plants (Taylor et al. 2004a). Fossil spores from these shallow marine sediments from the Ordovician that closely resemble Glomeromycota spores and finely branched hyphae arbuscules within plant cells were clearly preserved in cells of stems of a 400 Ma primitive land plant, Aglaophyton, from Rhynie chert 455–460 Ma in age (Redecker et al. 2000; Remy et al. 1994) and from roots from the Triassic (250–199 Ma) (Berbee & Taylor 2010; Stubblefield et al. -
Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota
Fungal Diversity (2019) 99:105–367 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota 1,2,3 1,4 3 5 5 Mao-Qiang He • Rui-Lin Zhao • Kevin D. Hyde • Dominik Begerow • Martin Kemler • 6 7 8,9 10 11 Andrey Yurkov • Eric H. C. McKenzie • Olivier Raspe´ • Makoto Kakishima • Santiago Sa´nchez-Ramı´rez • 12 13 14 15 16 Else C. Vellinga • Roy Halling • Viktor Papp • Ivan V. Zmitrovich • Bart Buyck • 8,9 3 17 18 1 Damien Ertz • Nalin N. Wijayawardene • Bao-Kai Cui • Nathan Schoutteten • Xin-Zhan Liu • 19 1 1,3 1 1 1 Tai-Hui Li • Yi-Jian Yao • Xin-Yu Zhu • An-Qi Liu • Guo-Jie Li • Ming-Zhe Zhang • 1 1 20 21,22 23 Zhi-Lin Ling • Bin Cao • Vladimı´r Antonı´n • Teun Boekhout • Bianca Denise Barbosa da Silva • 18 24 25 26 27 Eske De Crop • Cony Decock • Ba´lint Dima • Arun Kumar Dutta • Jack W. Fell • 28 29 30 31 Jo´ zsef Geml • Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad • Admir J. Giachini • Tatiana B. Gibertoni • 32 33,34 17 35 Sergio P. Gorjo´ n • Danny Haelewaters • Shuang-Hui He • Brendan P. Hodkinson • 36 37 38 39 40,41 Egon Horak • Tamotsu Hoshino • Alfredo Justo • Young Woon Lim • Nelson Menolli Jr. • 42 43,44 45 46 47 Armin Mesˇic´ • Jean-Marc Moncalvo • Gregory M. Mueller • La´szlo´ G. Nagy • R. Henrik Nilsson • 48 48 49 2 Machiel Noordeloos • Jorinde Nuytinck • Takamichi Orihara • Cheewangkoon Ratchadawan • 50,51 52 53 Mario Rajchenberg • Alexandre G. -
AR TICLE Calocybella, a New Genus for Rugosomyces
IMA FUNGUS · 6(1): 1–11 (2015) [!644"E\ 56!46F6!6! Calocybella, a new genus for Rugosomyces pudicusAgaricales, ARTICLE Lyophyllaceae and emendation of the genus Gerhardtia / X OO !] % G 5*@ 3 S S ! !< * @ @ + Z % V X ;/U 54N.!6!54V N K . [ % OO ^ 5X O F!N.766__G + N 3X G; %!N.7F65"@OO U % N Abstract: Calocybella Rugosomyces pudicus; Key words: *@Z.NV@? Calocybella Gerhardtia Agaricomycetes . $ VGerhardtia is Calocybe $ / % Lyophyllaceae Calocybe juncicola Calocybella pudica Lyophyllum *@Z NV@? $ Article info:@ [!5` 56!4K/ [!6U 56!4K; [5_U 56!4 INTRODUCTION .% >93 2Q9 % @ The generic name Rugosomyces [ Agaricus Rugosomyces onychinus !"#" . Rubescentes Rugosomyces / $ % OO $ % Calocybe Lyophyllaceae $ % \ G IQ 566! * % @SU % +!""! Rhodocybe. % % $ Rubescentes V O Rugosomyces [ $ Gerhardtia % % . Carneoviolacei $ G IG 5667 Rugosomyces pudicus Calocybe Lyophyllum . Calocybe / 566F / Rugosomyces 9 et al5665 U %et al5665 +!""" 2 O Rugosomyces as !""4566756!5 9 5664; Calocybe R. pudicus Lyophyllaceae 9 et al 5665 56!7 Calocybe <>/? ; I G 566" R. pudicus * @ @ !"EF+!"""G IG 56652 / 566F -
Lyophyllum Turcicum (Agaricomycetes: Lyophyllaceae), a New Species from Turkey
Turkish Journal of Botany Turk J Bot (2015) 39: 512-519 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/bot-1407-16 Lyophyllum turcicum (Agaricomycetes: Lyophyllaceae), a new species from Turkey 1, 2 3 Ertuğrul SESLİ *, Alfredo VIZZINI , Marco CONTU 1 Department of Biology Education, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey 2 Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy 3 Via Marmilla, Olbia, Italy Received: 03.07.2014 Accepted: 21.11.2014 Published Online: 04.05.2015 Printed: 29.05.2015 Abstract: A new species, Lyophyllum turcicum, from the Kümbet plateau of the Dereli district in Giresun Province, Turkey, is described, taxonomically delimited, and illustrated based on morphological and molecular data. The new species belongs to a small group of species in the Lyophyllum sect. Difformia as traditionally circumscribed. Lyophyllum turcicum is easily distinguished mainly by the light tinges of the basidiomes, filiform-fusiform to cylindro-flexuose marginal cells, and elongate, ellipsoid spores. Key words: Lyophyllaceae, Lyophyllum turcicum, new species, Turkey 1. Introduction L. soniae Picillo & Contu (Italy); and L. tucumanense In recent years some new taxa have been described in Sing. (Argentina, South America). The genus Lyophyllum the complex of the not blackening, caespitose-growing presently consists of about 230 taxa worldwide (Robert et Lyophyllum P. Karst. species belonging to section Difformia al., 1999; Consiglio and Contu, 2002). (Bon, 1999). Lyophyllum sect. Difformia is presently Seven Lyophyllum species [L. decastes (Fr.) Singer, L. known to include 14 caespitose and/or not blackening fumosum (Pers.) P.D. Orton, L. infumatum (Bres.) Kühner, Lyophyllum species worldwide. -
Two New Genus Records for Turkish Mycota
MYCOTAXON Volume 111, pp. 477–480 January–March 2010 Two new genus records for Turkish mycota Yusuf Uzun1, Kenan Demirel1, Abdullah Kaya2* & Fahrettin Gücin3 *[email protected] 1Yüzüncü Yıl University, Science & Arts Faculty TR 65080, Van Turkey 2Adıyaman University, Education Faculty TR 02040, Adıyaman Turkey 3Fatih University Science & Arts Faculty TR 34500, Istanbul Turkey Abstract — The genera Geopyxis (Pyronemataceae) and Asterophora (Lyophyllaceae) are recorded from Turkey for the first time, based on collections of Geopyxis carbonaria and Asterophora lycoperdoides. Short descriptions and photographs of the taxa are provided. Key words —Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, biodiversity, macrofungi Introduction Geopyxis carbonaria (Pyronemataceae) is an abundant post-fire discomycete in coniferous forests. This fleshy mushroom has a complex life cycle and is mycorrhizal on deep roots of members of the Pinaceae, and fruits only when the trees die (Vrålstad et al. 1998). Since it often fruits prolifically after wildfires, it has also been considered to be a possible indicator of imminent morel fruiting (Obst & Brown 2000). Asterophora lycoperdoides (Lyophyllaceae) is a relatively rare basidiomycete that parasitizes other mushrooms in the family Russulaceae, especially Russula nigricans and Russula densifolia. It usually fruits after the host has blackened and begun to decay (Kuo 2006). The fungus generally reproduces asexually by brown powdery chlamydospores formed on the cap surface; its gills, which are often absent or deformed, produce sexual basidiospores only infrequently (Roody 2003). According to checklists (Sesli & Denchev 2009) and recently published data (Solak et al. 2009, Kaya 2009), neither of the above taxa have previously been recorded from Turkey. The study aims to contribute to the macromycota of Turkey. -
Molecular Phylogenetics of the Gloeophyllales and Relative Ages of Clades of Agaromycotina Producing a Brown Rot
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/49709889 Molecular phylogenetics of the Gloeophyllales and relative ages of clades of Agaromycotina producing a brown rot ARTICLE in MYCOLOGIA · DECEMBER 2010 Impact Factor: 2.47 · DOI: 10.3852/10-209 · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 22 43 4 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Ricardo Garcia-Sandoval Zheng Wang Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Yale University 11 PUBLICATIONS 35 CITATIONS 63 PUBLICATIONS 2,757 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Manfred Binder 143 PUBLICATIONS 5,089 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Available from: Zheng Wang Retrieved on: 01 December 2015 Mycologia, 103(3), 2011, pp. 510–524. DOI: 10.3852/10-209 # 2011 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Molecular phylogenetics of the Gloeophyllales and relative ages of clades of Agaricomycotina producing a brown rot Ricardo Garcia-Sandoval mushrooms (Agaricomycotina), containing a single Biology Department, Clark University, Worcester, family, Gloeophyllaceae (Kirk et al. 2008). Gloeophyl- Massachusetts 01610 lum as currently circumscribed includes roughly 13 Zheng Wang species, including the model brown-rot species, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale Gloeophyllum trabeum (Pers. : Fr.) Murrill and G. University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511 sepiarium (Wulfen. : Fr.) P. Karst., which are widely used in experimental studies on wood-decay chemis- Manfred Binder 1 try (e.g. Jensen et al. 2001, Baldrian and Vala´skova´ David S. Hibbett 2008). A complete genome sequence of G. trabeum is Biology Department, Clark University, Worcester, in production (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/pages/ Massachusetts 01610 fungi/home.jsf). Species of Gloeophyllum have pileate, effused-reflexed or resupinate fruiting bodies, poroid to lamellate hymenophores and di- to trimitic hyphal Abstract: The Gloeophyllales is a recently described construction; all have bipolar mating systems and order of Agaricomycotina containing a morphologi- produce a brown rot (Gilbertson and Ryvarden 1986). -
Major Clades of Agaricales: a Multilocus Phylogenetic Overview
Mycologia, 98(6), 2006, pp. 982–995. # 2006 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview P. Brandon Matheny1 Duur K. Aanen Judd M. Curtis Laboratory of Genetics, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD, Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Wageningen, The Netherlands Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610 Matthew DeNitis Vale´rie Hofstetter 127 Harrington Way, Worcester, Massachusetts 01604 Department of Biology, Box 90338, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 Graciela M. Daniele Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biologı´a Vegetal, M. Catherine Aime CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Co´rdoba, Casilla USDA-ARS, Systematic Botany and Mycology de Correo 495, 5000 Co´rdoba, Argentina Laboratory, Room 304, Building 011A, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350 Dennis E. Desjardin Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, Jean-Marc Moncalvo San Francisco, California 94132 Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Royal Ontario Museum and Department of Botany, University Bradley R. Kropp of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2C6 Canada Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 Zai-Wei Ge Zhu-Liang Yang Lorelei L. Norvell Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Pacific Northwest Mycology Service, 6720 NW Skyline Sciences, Kunming 650204, P.R. China Boulevard, Portland, Oregon 97229-1309 Jason C. Slot Andrew Parker Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, 127 Raven Way, Metaline Falls, Washington 99153 Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609 9720 Joseph F. Ammirati Else C. Vellinga University of Washington, Biology Department, Box Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, 111 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 Koshland Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3102 Timothy J. -
Major Clades of Agaricales: a Multilocus Phylogenetic Overview
Mycologia, 98(6), 2006, pp. 982–995. # 2006 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview P. Brandon Matheny1 Duur K. Aanen Judd M. Curtis Laboratory of Genetics, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD, Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Wageningen, The Netherlands Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610 Matthew DeNitis Vale´rie Hofstetter 127 Harrington Way, Worcester, Massachusetts 01604 Department of Biology, Box 90338, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 Graciela M. Daniele Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biologı´a Vegetal, M. Catherine Aime CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Co´rdoba, Casilla USDA-ARS, Systematic Botany and Mycology de Correo 495, 5000 Co´rdoba, Argentina Laboratory, Room 304, Building 011A, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350 Dennis E. Desjardin Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, Jean-Marc Moncalvo San Francisco, California 94132 Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Royal Ontario Museum and Department of Botany, University Bradley R. Kropp of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2C6 Canada Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 Zai-Wei Ge Zhu-Liang Yang Lorelei L. Norvell Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Pacific Northwest Mycology Service, 6720 NW Skyline Sciences, Kunming 650204, P.R. China Boulevard, Portland, Oregon 97229-1309 Jason C. Slot Andrew Parker Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, 127 Raven Way, Metaline Falls, Washington 99153- Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609 9720 Joseph F. Ammirati Else C. Vellinga University of Washington, Biology Department, Box Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, 111 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 Koshland Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3102 Timothy J. -
Investigating Wood Decaying Fungi Diversity in Central Siberia, Russia Using ITS Sequence Analysis and Interaction with Host Trees
sustainability Article Investigating Wood Decaying Fungi Diversity in Central Siberia, Russia Using ITS Sequence Analysis and Interaction with Host Trees Ji-Hyun Park 1, Igor N. Pavlov 2,3 , Min-Ji Kim 4, Myung Soo Park 1, Seung-Yoon Oh 5 , Ki Hyeong Park 1, Jonathan J. Fong 6 and Young Woon Lim 1,* 1 School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Microbiology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea; [email protected] (J.-H.P.); [email protected] (M.S.P.); [email protected] (K.H.P.) 2 Laboratory of Reforestation, Mycology and Plant Pathology, V. N. Sukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia; [email protected] 3 Department of Chemical Technology of Wood and Biotechnology, Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology, 660049 Krasnoyarsk, Russia 4 Wood Utilization Division, Forest Products Department, National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul 02455, Korea; [email protected] 5 Department of Biology and Chemistry, Changwon National University, Changwon 51140, Korea; [email protected] 6 Science Unit, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2880-6708 Received: 27 February 2020; Accepted: 18 March 2020; Published: 24 March 2020 Abstract: Wood-decay fungi (WDF) play a significant role in recycling nutrients, using enzymatic and mechanical processes to degrade wood. Designated as a biodiversity hot spot, Central Siberia is a geographically important region for understanding the spatial distribution and the evolutionary processes shaping biodiversity. There have been several studies of WDF diversity in Central Siberia, but identification of species was based on morphological characteristics, lacking detailed descriptions and molecular data. -
Mycological Notes 37 New Zealand Lyophyllaceae and Broadly Related Species
Mycological Notes 37 New Zealand Lyophyllaceae and broadly related species Jerry Cooper, 1st Jan. 2017 At the time of writing the phylogenetic boundaries of the Lyophyllaceae are yet to be firmly established. The genera and species within the family are rather nondescript fungi with the appearance of other genera such as Tricholoma, Clitocybe, Gymnopus/Collybia or Mycena. As a consequence members of the family are difficult to recognise, although the larger species seem to be characteristically fasciculate and have a greasy texture to the cap when fresh. They are distinguished microscopically because the nuclei within the basidia bind to iron salts and they can be stained. The staining results in dark purple ‘siderophilous’ granules within the basidia. Such basidia are called carminophilous, after the stain used. I’ve found these are best seen by boiling a piece of gill material on a glass slide in a generous drop of concentrated acetocarmine solution, and then quickly and vigorously prodding/stirring with a rusty nail, repeat heat/prodding, and then finally blotting the result and mounting in fresh acetocarmine or lactic acid. Note that standard acetocarmine solution, which is generally used for staining chromosomes, is not sufficiently concentrated. See Clemencon 2009 for more details and more sophisticated staining methods. Cotton blue in lactic acid has a similar staining effect, although I find the results less convincing. Genera and species within a broader concept of the family may not show the reaction. Early phylogenetic data confirmed the family and identified different clades but the genus Lyophyllum was clearly polyphyletic. As a consequence several new genera were erected for species that were previously treated as Tephrocybe/Lyophyllum.