DOCSLIB.ORG

The Coalition of 1915 – 1916 Prelude to Liberal Disaster

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Coalition of 1915 – 1916 Prelude to Liberal Disaster The coalition of 1915 – 1916 preLuDe to Liberal DisAster The coalition of 1915– 1916 has not had a very good press. Liberals have traditionally disliked it because it signalled the end of the last Liberal government to hold power in the United Kingdom. Conservatives have not been much happier with it, seeing it as still dominated by the Liberal ‘old gang’ headed by Asquith, and insufficiently willing to take drastic action to support the army and organise the economy during the First World War. Ian Packer analyses the record of the 1915–16 coalition. Does it represent a bove all, the coalition to form a new coalition, which health warning against did not deliver mili- did emerge triumphant in 1918. tary victory and it col- In these circumstances, not many Liberal coalitions with lapsed in acrimony in historians have had a kind word to December 1916, leav- say for the first wartime coalition Conservatives? Aing the field free for Lloyd George of 1915–1916.1 However, it was not 26 Journal of Liberal History 72 Autumn 2011 The coalition of 1915 – 1916 preLuDe to Liberal DisAster necessarily a particularly incompe- Edwardian politicians were, there- this could be read as implicit sup- tent administration, nor one that fore, scarcely averse to cross-party port for a coalition, if necessary.4 demonstrated that Liberals were cooperation. However, Asquith’s skillful han- unable to adapt their ideology to In August 1914, a Liberal– dling of his Cabinet banished the winning a modern war – it was just Conservative coalition was, for a spectre that the Conservative lead- in power during some of the most moment, a distinct possibility. The ers’ letter had summoned up. While desperate times of the First World leading figures in the Liberal gov- the Conservatives had twenty- War. The coalition did, though, ernment, particularly the prime five more MPs than the Liberals in prove disastrous for Liberalism minister, Asquith, and the Foreign August 1914, the Liberals retained by paving the way for the power Secretary, Sir Edward Grey, were a secure parliamentary majority struggle between Asquith and determined that Britain must inter- through the support of the thirty- Lloyd George which destroyed the vene in a continental war on the seven Labour MPs and eighty-five Edwardian Liberal Party. If the side of Russia and France.2 But a Irish Nationalists. Both Labour Liberal Party needs a warning that few other Cabinet members were and the Irish, under the leadership coalitions can be dangerous for your implacably opposed to this conti- of John Redmond, supported the health than the experience of 1915– nental ‘entanglement’, while the decision to declare war, though 1916 provides a salutary example. majority wavered in between. Until both parties, like the Liberals, con- That the First World War would two tense Cabinet meetings on 2 tained opponents of this decision.5 lead to a coalition government was August decided to support a dec- But once they had decided to sup- a possibility that hung over British laration of war if German troops port the Liberals they became bound politics from the very beginning invaded Belgium or German ships even more tightly to the govern- of the war. The political era before entered the Channel, it was pos- ment. If the Liberals were replaced 1914 is often seen as the classic time sible that the Liberal government by the Conservatives or a coali- when the ‘swing of the pendulum’ would collapse. In fact, only two tion government that contained ensured alternating Liberal and Cabinet ministers, Lord Morley Conservatives, then Labour and the Conservative governments, with and John Burns, resigned in protest Irish Nationalists feared that objec- secure parliamentary majorities. at this decision, while a maximum tives they held dear would be threat- But the existence of other parties of about twenty MPs harboured ened. Labour was worried that trade ensured that the picture was actu- serious doubts about entering the union privileges would be eroded ally far more complicated. The war.3 This outcome allowed the and particularly disliked the pos- Conservative government of 1886– Liberal government to survive vir- sibility of industrial conscription; 1892 relied on the Liberal Unionists tually intact and direct Britain into the Irish hoped above all to protect for its majority and the government the war. But if there had been an the Home Rule Act that was put on of 1895–1905 was a formal coali- avalanche of resignations from the the statute book in September 1914, tion of Conservatives and Liberal Liberal government it was possible though suspended until no later than Unionists. The Liberals relied on the that Asquith and the pro-interven- the end of the war. Irish Nationalists to support them tion ministers would have tried The Liberal government seemed in power in 1892–1895 and again in to survive in power by forming a safe for the time being. In wartime 1910–1914, with the infant Labour coalition with the Conservatives. the Conservative opposition could Party also providing help on the Bonar Law and Lord Lansdowne, not even criticise the government, latter occasion. In the whole period the Conservative leaders in the for fear of seeming unpatriotic, 1886–1914, only the Liberal govern- House of Commons and House of Left: especially when Asquith pulled ment of 1906–1910 was not either a Lords respectively, had written to H. H. Asquith, off the political masterstroke of coalition or reliant on another party Asquith on 2 August pledging their Liberal Prime appointing the leading general, for its majority. Late Victorian and full support for intervention and Minister 1908–16 Lord Kitchener, as Secretary of Journal of Liberal History 72 Autumn 2011 27 tHe coalition of 1915–1916: preLuDe to Liberal DisAster State for War.6 Divisions of course what under- lead to coalition was amply dem- of the ‘sudden curves’ in politics arose about how to conduct the onstrated in the early days of the he liked to think he had a special war, but they were not fatal to the mined the war in France. When German aptitude for spotting.12 On 17 May, Cabinet’s unity, which had been troops threatened Paris the out- Bonar Law called on Lloyd George built up over nine years of suc- Liberal gov- come was a national coalition under to confirm that Fisher had resigned. cessful peacetime administration. René Viviani on 28 August 1914. In the course of their conversation The crucial dispute was about how ernment and Many British politicians of course the idea of an all-party coalition much of the country’s economic hoped the war would be ‘over by government seems to have arisen and manpower resources should be paved the Christmas’ – and Liberal politicians (though who initiated the idea and committed to the war.7 A group of believed no doubt that a grateful in what context has remained a Liberal ministers, centred around way for the electorate would reward them for matter of dispute).13 When Lloyd McKenna, Runciman and Harcourt coalition was leading the nation to victory. But George reported his conversation took a cautious approach, fear- this prediction proved an illusion. to Asquith, the latter summoned ing that massively disrupting the simply its The decisive battle on the western Bonar Law to 10 Downing Street economy would lead to Britain’s front never came and was replaced and, in a conversation that alleg- financial collapse. Lloyd George, inability to by the stalemate of a line of trenches edly lasted only fifteen minutes, on the other hand, rapidly associ- from Switzerland to the North Sea. the termination of the last Liberal ated himself with a policy of ‘total win the war. In early 1915 the Liberal govern- government was agreed. Asquith war’, calling for a massive expan- ment still remained hopeful of an probably felt the need to strike a sion of munitions production and early victory, but these predictions, deal as quickly as possible, before his increasing government interven- too, came to nothing. Instead, a Cabinet’s authority and the Liberal tion in the economy. This was series of military and diplomatic Party’s popularity waned any fur- partly a temperamental difference, setbacks rattled the Cabinet’s opti- ther. A coalition would force the but it also reflected, to a certain mism. The spring Anglo-French Conservatives to share responsibil- extent, pre-war attitudes. Lloyd offensive on the Western Front ity (and blame) for wartime deci- George had been an advocate of failed to break the German lines. sions. It was, for this very reason, expanding the state’s role in social Instead it backfired on the govern- distinctly unpopular with many reform, while McKenna and his ment, when reports, inspired by Conservative leaders, but they felt allies had been much more dubious. military figures, appeared in The they could not refuse for fear of In wartime, Lloyd George merely Times on 14 May 1915, suggesting seeming to run away at a moment expanded his enthusiasm for state that British troops were being held of supreme national crisis.14 Labour, intervention to include organising back by a shortage of ammunition. too, accepted a Cabinet post to pro- the country for victory. This was At the same time, Churchill’s brain- tect trade union interests, while the certainly not a dispute between one child of a landing at the Dardanelles Irish Nationalists declined as they approach that was Liberal and one merely provided another military did not wish to be too closely associ- that was not: Liberalism before 1914 stalemate and neither forced the ated with a British government, or had accommodated itself to a great Ottoman Empire out of the war nor face taunts at home that they had deal of state intervention, espe- brought the neutral Balkan states accepted paid posts from the British cially in the field of social welfare.8 into the war on Britain’s side.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fitzgerald in the Late 1910S: War and Women Richard M
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Duquesne University: Digital Commons Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2009 Fitzgerald in the Late 1910s: War and Women Richard M. Clark Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Clark, R. (2009). Fitzgerald in the Late 1910s: War and Women (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/416 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FITZGERALD IN THE LATE 1910s: WAR AND WOMEN A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty College and Graduate School Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Richard M. Clark August 2009 Copyright by Richard M. Clark 2009 FITZGERALD IN THE LATE 1910s: WAR AND WOMEN By Richard M. Clark Approved July 21, 2009 ________________________________ ________________________________ Linda Kinnahan, Ph.D. Greg Barnhisel, Ph.D. Professor of English Assistant Professor of English (Dissertation Director) (2nd Reader) ________________________________ ________________________________ Frederick Newberry, Ph.D. Magali Cornier Michael, Ph.D. Professor of English Professor of English (1st Reader) (Chair, Department of English) ________________________________ Christopher M. Duncan, Ph.D. Dean, McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts iii ABSTRACT FITZGERALD IN THE LATE 1910s: WAR AND WOMEN By Richard M. Clark August 2009 Dissertation supervised by Professor Linda Kinnahan This dissertation analyzes historical and cultural factors that influenced F.
    [Show full text]
  • World War I Timeline C
    6.2.1 World War I Timeline c June 28, 1914 Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophia are killed by Serbian nationalists. July 26, 1914 Austria declares war on Serbia. Russia, an ally of Serbia, prepares to enter the war. July 29, 1914 Austria invades Serbia. August 1, 1914 Germany declares war on Russia. August 3, 1914 Germany declares war on France. August 4, 1914 German army invades neutral Belgium on its way to attack France. Great Britain declares war on Germany. As a colony of Britain, Canada is now at war. Prime Minister Robert Borden calls for a supreme national effort to support Britain, and offers assistance. Canadians rush to enlist in the military. August 6, 1914 Austria declares war on Russia. August 12, 1914 France and Britain declare war on Austria. October 1, 1914 The first Canadian troops leave to be trained in Britain. October – November 1914 First Battle of Ypres, France. Germany fails to reach the English Channel. 1914 – 1917 The two huge armies are deadlocked along a 600-mile front of Deadlock and growing trenches in Belgium and France. For four years, there is little change. death tolls Attack after attack fails to cross enemy lines, and the toll in human lives grows rapidly. Both sides seek help from other allies. By 1917, every continent and all the oceans of the world are involved in this war. February 1915 The first Canadian soldiers land in France to fight alongside British troops. April - May 1915 The Second Battle of Ypres. Germans use poison gas and break a hole through the long line of Allied trenches.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crime of Material Culture, the Condition of the Colonies And
    The Crime of Material Culture, the Condition of the Colonies and Utopian/Dystopian Impulses, 1908-10 Robyn Walton During the years 1908-10 in Britain and Northern Europe, a number of liter- ary authors were producing fictions that both reflected and critiqued what Joseph Conrad later described as “the crudely materialistic atmosphere of the time.”1 In 1908, Conrad and his literary collaborator Ford Madox Ford (Hueffer) were completing The Nature of a Crime , a slight tale of one Lon- don professional’s addiction to embezzlement .2 Taking this Conrad-Ford microcosm of Edwardian materialism as its point of departure, this article first analyses how a range of 1908-10 fictions represent local financial prac- tices and the impacts of Northern money-making and materialistic culture. It notes that the narratives concentrate on upwardly mobile and creative characters of the middle classes, rather than on aristocrats or on the work- ing poor and unemployed who were the subject of contemporaneous social surveys and were the most immediately affected by their social superiors’ financial criminality and mismanagement. The article then asks why – given that Northern incomes, raw materials, and finished goods frequently had their origins in the colonies and developing nations – these fictions rarely examined the impacts of global resource exploitation on regions outside Europe. A number of possible reasons why the 1908-10 authors did not at- tend to the colonies are explored. The fictions’ few allusions to colonies and developing nations are found to further the authors’ collective critique of COLLOQUY text theory critique 21 (2011). © Monash University. www.arts.monash.edu.au/ecps/colloquy/journal/issue021/walton.pdf 116 Robyn Walton ░ Europe’s materialist, capitalist culture rather than to investigate colonial cir- cumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • The War and Fashion
    F a s h i o n , S o c i e t y , a n d t h e First World War i ii Fashion, Society, and the First World War International Perspectives E d i t e d b y M a u d e B a s s - K r u e g e r , H a y l e y E d w a r d s - D u j a r d i n , a n d S o p h i e K u r k d j i a n iii BLOOMSBURY VISUAL ARTS Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 50 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3DP, UK 1385 Broadway, New York, NY 10018, USA 29 Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland BLOOMSBURY, BLOOMSBURY VISUAL ARTS and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published in Great Britain 2021 Selection, editorial matter, Introduction © Maude Bass-Krueger, Hayley Edwards-Dujardin, and Sophie Kurkdjian, 2021 Individual chapters © their Authors, 2021 Maude Bass-Krueger, Hayley Edwards-Dujardin, and Sophie Kurkdjian have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identifi ed as Editors of this work. For legal purposes the Acknowledgments on p. xiii constitute an extension of this copyright page. Cover design by Adriana Brioso Cover image: Two women wearing a Poiret military coat, c.1915. Postcard from authors’ personal collection. This work is published subject to a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives Licence. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher Bloomsbury Publishing Plc does not have any control over, or responsibility for, any third- party websites referred to or in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Thecoalition
    The Coalition Voters, Parties and Institutions Welcome to this interactive pdf version of The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Please note that in order to view this pdf as intended and to take full advantage of the interactive functions, we strongly recommend you open this document in Adobe Acrobat. Adobe Acrobat Reader is free to download and you can do so from the Adobe website (click to open webpage). Navigation • Each page includes a navigation bar with buttons to view the previous and next pages, along with a button to return to the contents page at any time • You can click on any of the titles on the contents page to take you directly to each article Figures • To examine any of the figures in more detail, you can click on the + button beside each figure to open a magnified view. You can also click on the diagram itself. To return to the full page view, click on the - button Weblinks and email addresses • All web links and email addresses are live links - you can click on them to open a website or new email <>contents The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Edited by: Hussein Kassim Charles Clarke Catherine Haddon <>contents Published 2012 Commissioned by School of Political, Social and International Studies University of East Anglia Norwich Design by Woolf Designs (www.woolfdesigns.co.uk) <>contents Introduction 03 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Introduction The formation of the Conservative-Liberal In his opening paper, Bob Worcester discusses Democratic administration in May 2010 was a public opinion and support for the parties in major political event.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did the United States Enter World War I in 1917?
    Why did the United States Enter World War I in 1917? Matt Moore Mankato West High School Mankato, Minnesota Grade Level: 9 - 12 Objectives: At the conclusion of this lesson, students will be able to Explain why the United States hesitated to get involved in World War I at its onset Explain the series of events that eventually drew the United States into World War Guiding Question: Why did the United States enter World War I in 1917? Connections to Common Core: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.1 - Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.2 - Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary of the source distinct from prior knowledge or opinions. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.6 - Identify aspects of a text that reveal an author’s point of view or purpose (e.g., loaded language, inclusion or avoidance of particular facts). Connections to C3 Framework: D2.His.1.9-12 – Evaluate how historical events and developments were shaped by unique circumstances of time and place as well as broader historical contexts. D2.His.5.9-12 – Analyze how historical contexts shaped and continue to shape people’s perspectives. D2.His.11.9-12 – Critique the usefulness of historical sources for a specific historical inquiry based on their maker, date, place of origin, intended audience, and purpose. D2.His.14.9-12 – Analyze multiple and complex causes and effects of events in the past. D2.His.16.9-12 – Integrate evidence from multiple relevant historical sources and interpretations into a reasoned argument about the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of Parliament Disqualified Since 1900 This Document Provides Information About Members of Parliament Who Have Been Disqu
    Members of Parliament Disqualified since 1900 This document provides information about Members of Parliament who have been disqualified since 1900. It is impossible to provide an entirely exhaustive list, as in many cases, the disqualification of a Member is not directly recorded in the Journal. For example, in the case of Members being appointed 5 to an office of profit under the Crown, it has only recently become practice to record the appointment of a Member to such an office in the Journal. Prior to this, disqualification can only be inferred from the writ moved for the resulting by-election. It is possible that in some circumstances, an election could have occurred before the writ was moved, in which case there would be no record from which to infer the disqualification, however this is likely to have been a rare occurrence. This list is based on 10 the writs issued following disqualification and the reason given, such as appointments to an office of profit under the Crown; appointments to judicial office; election court rulings and expulsion. Appointment of a Member to an office of profit under the Crown in the Chiltern Hundreds or the Manor of Northstead is a device used to allow Members to resign their seats, as it is not possible to simply resign as a Member of Parliament, once elected. This is by far the most common means of 15 disqualification. There are a number of Members disqualified in the early part of the twentieth century for taking up Ministerial Office. Until the passage of the Re-Election of Ministers Act 1919, Members appointed to Ministerial Offices were disqualified and had to seek re-election.
    [Show full text]
  • Italy at War, 1915-1918*
    Italy at War, 1915-1918* Francesco L. Galassi University of Warwick and Università di Ferrara and Mark Harrison University of Warwick * This paper appeared as a chapter in The Economics of World War I, pp. 276-309. Edited by Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Particular thanks for assistance with bibliographic information and research are owed to Alessandro Massignani and to Lieutenant Vettannio of the Historical Archive of the Army General Staff, Rome. The usual disclaimers apply. 1. Introduction Italy had long nursed the ambition to complete its national unification by annexing the territories held by Austria around Trento and Trieste before the Great War. Yet Italy’s diplomacy and armed forces reached war unprepared. It will be argued in this chapter that this reflected international constraints as well as domestic political and social forces before 1914, and it will shown how these influenced the Italian war effort. As an economic power Italy is most easily compared with the Habsburg Empire, her chief adversary in World War I. These two powers were both economically of middle size and development level, but the Italian economy was a little smaller and also somewhat more developed than the Austro-Hungarian. Thus Italy’s prewar population numbered 36 millions compared with Austria-Hungary’s 51 millions while Italy’s real GDP was roughly 90 per cent of Austria-Hungary’s. Thus the average citizen of the Austro-Hungarian empire was roughly 25 per cent poorer than the average Italian (see chapter 1, tables 1 and 2). In turn, Italians were substantially poorer than the Germans, French, or British.
    [Show full text]
  • Lloyd George Chris Wrigley Examines the Roots of Lloyd George’S Political Beliefs the Nonconformist Mind of David Lloyd George
    Lloyd George Chris Wrigley examines the roots of Lloyd George’s political beliefs The Nonconformist Mind of David Lloyd George avid Lloyd George has often proved extra-parliamentary speechmaking’ which to be an elusive figure to pin down, made for a national political debate. He further Dboth for his contemporaries and, later, commented: for historians. Like Disraeli, he was not part of the English public schoolboys’ milieu; nor was The decline of Whiggery and the loss of Cham- he aided by family connections in the way that berlain meant that the upper levels of the Lib- Arthur Balfour was by the ‘Hotel Cecil’, the eral Party increasingly depended on rhetoric as term used to describe Lord Salisbury’s govern- their link with the party as well as the electorate. ments with its many places for his relatives. Lloyd Men such as Gladstone, Morley and Asquith had George was, as he liked to put it, a ‘cottage-bred no base for power within their party save their man’ or, as opponents put it in doggerel verse, a rhetoric and their legislative achievements. They ‘bounder from Wales’.1 He reached Westminster controlled no machine, they spent no money on through grass-roots activism, not family or social politics, they had no base in the localities, no real connections. patronage except when in office.4 Keynes famously wrote: Lloyd George was different in so far as he did have Lloyd George is rooted in nothing; he is void a base in north Wales and more broadly in Non- and without content; he lives and feeds on his conformity, at least until the First World War immediate surroundings; he is an instrument but arguably later.
    [Show full text]
  • British Masculinity and Propaganda During the First World War Evan M
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2015 British Masculinity and Propaganda during the First World War Evan M. Caris Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Caris, Evan M., "British Masculinity and Propaganda during the First World War" (2015). LSU Master's Theses. 4047. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/4047 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BRITISH MASCULINITY AND PROPAGANDA DURING THE FIRST WORLD WAR A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Evan M. Caris B.A. Georgia College & State University, 2011 December 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTACT ..................................................................................................................................... iii 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 2. MASCULINITY IN BRITISH PROPAGANDA POSTERS DURING THE FIRST WORLD
    [Show full text]
  • Cooper County Marriages 1910 to 1919
    COOPER COUNTY MARRIAGE RECORDS 1910 to 1919 Not Necessarily Complete or Accurate DATE GROOM BRIDE D / M / Y Bauer, William Andrew Thoma, Dora 18 / Jan / 1910 Lusk, Boyd Sterling Scott, Nellie 19 / Jan / 1910 Torbeck, Henry F. Schwitzky, Anna 23 / Feb / 1910 Schler, Anton Henry Gerhardt, Katharina 29 / Mar / 1910 Selbach, Johann Jacob Duermeier, Maria 6 / Apr / 1910 Gerke, Henry William Franken, Anna 19 / Apr / 1910 Gerhardt, Albert Stegner, Bertha 22 / Sep / 1910 Durland, Dewitt Chilton II Mittelbach, Julia 29 / Sep / 1910 Gerhardt, Albert Stegner, Bertha K. 22 / Sep / 1910 Robien, John W. Anderson, Anna 18 / Oct / 1910 Brickner, Walter Johnmeyer, Nellie 26 / Oct / 1910 Brueckner, Walter Johnmeyer, Nellie M. 26 / Oct / 1910 Barnet, Carl Aloysus Koenig, Louise 2 / Nov / 1910 Matthews, Andrew J. Bader, Mary 11 / Nov / 1910 Jaeger, William Schierholtz, Bettie M. 20 / Dec / 1910 Pogue, Lewis Anderson Chenault, Eliva 24 / Dec / 1910 Esser, Adam John Day, Theresa M. 22 / Feb / 1911 Friedrich, George Marcus Smith, Ethel M. 21 / Mar / 1911 Meyer, Henry Schuster, Lena 25 / Apr / 1911 Johnmeyer, Frederick Henry Leonard Schler, Marie Annie 2 / May / 1911 Payne, Finis E. Wittmann, Ella 5 / Jun / 1911 Gerling, John Conrad Vollrath, Mary 14 / Nov / 1911 Roberts, Frank Broomer, Mary 13 / Dec / 1911 Geiger, George Victor Hoflander, Dorothea 10 / Jan / 1912 Neef, Frederick Ernst Selck, Eva 13 / Apr / 1912 Hurt, Clarence Lee Blanck, Lulu 22 / May / 1912 Fredrich, John Lawrence George Wallje, Rosa Meta 14 / Aug / 1912 Ries, Johannes G. Schneck, Ida 1 / Sep / 1912 Stegner, Walter Gottlieb Lambert, Edna 25 / Sep / 1912 Rothgeb, Daniel Leonard Ziegel, Grace M. 23 / Oct / 1912 Meyer, Francis Michael Langlotz, Bessie E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great War Cycling Trail in Artois Winds Its Despite the Heavy Shelling and Fierce Fighting
    NORTHERN FRANCE 16 SITES The Great to visit War Cycling Trail in Artois CYCLE GUIDE The first French attack, the First Battle of Artois out a remarkably well-prepared lightning strike The Great War (17–19 December 1914), was a failure and on Vimy Ridge, taking the position at a cost of cost the lives of 8,000 poilus. After the Second 3,600 lives. This success had a profound effect Battle of Artois (9 May–25 June 1915) the on the Canadians back home and was a defining Cycling Trail in Artois French started calling Notre-Dame-de-Lorette moment in the budding nation’s history. la colline sanglante (the bloody hill). They took The First World War in Artois Lorette Spur but failed to reach Vimy Ridge The Great War Cycling Trail in Artois winds its despite the heavy shelling and fierce fighting. way through a landscape that shows few scars The rim of the Artois plateau that lies 10 km In October 1914, during the “Race to the Sea” In total 40,000 French soldiers were killed and of the devastation once inflicted upon it. The north of Arras was a strategically important which preceded the war in the trenches, the 64,000 wounded for the gain of twenty square trees have been replanted, the trenches have position throughout the First World War. Lorette Germans managed to seize the high ground kilometres. German losses amounted to 75,000 been filled in, the battlefields ploughed, and the Spur (165 m) and Vimy Ridge (145 m) overlook along the Western Front and occupy the coal men either killed, wounded or taken prisoner.
    [Show full text]