The Humanitarian Operation Yobe State Nigeria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Humanitarian Operation Yobe State Nigeria STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR PREVENTION OF AND RESPONSE TO GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE THE HUMANITARIAN OPERATION YOBE STATE NIGERIA Developed under the leadership of Ministry of Women Affairs in Collaboration with: Ministry of Health,SPHCMB,MOBEP MYSD,MORA, Ministry of Justice,NSCDC,NPF, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF,UNOCHA, FHI360,COOPI, FIDA, MSF, NEMA, SEMA,FOMWAN , NCWS, GESDI, NAWOJ,RED CROSS, INOL,G&SI, JNI,CAN,NEIYF,Market Women Association,YYPL, ICRC, NTRL Initial; April 2016 Final SOP; June 2016 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 3 2. Setting and Persons of Concern .............................................................................................. 5 3. Definitions and Terms ............................................................................................................. 5 4. Guiding Principles ................................................................................................................... 6 5. Reporting and Referral Mechanisms ..................................................................................... 7 5.1. Disclosure and reporting .............................................................................................. 7 5.2. Help-seeking and referral pathway .............................................................................. 7 5.3. Consent and information sharing ................................................................................. 9 5.4. Special procedures for child victims/survivors ............................................................. 9 6. Responsibilities for Survivor/Victim Assistance (Response) .............................................. 10 6.1. Health/medical response ............................................................................................ 10 6.2. Psychosocial response ................................................................................................ 10 6.3. Security and safety response ....................................................................................... 13 6.4. Legal/justice response ................................................................................................ 13 6.4.1. Special consideration for child survivors in the legal justice system ......................... 13 6.4.2. Traditional justice mechanisms .................................................................................. 13 7. Responsibilities for Prevention ............................................................................................. 14 7.1. All parties to these SOPs ............................................................................................ 14 7.2. Community leaders ..................................................................................................... 14 7.5. Other sectors/clusters/ coordination structure/UN Agencies & INGO ...................... 16 8. Informing the Community about these SOPs ...................................................................... 17 8.1. Information dissemination to the community ............................................................. 17 8.2. Information dissemination to other organizations and government ........................... 17 9. Documentation, Data, and Monitoring ................................................................................ 18 9.1. Data management, reported incidents ........................................................................ 18 9.2. Indicators .................................................................................................................... 18 9.3. GBV monitoring report ............................................................................................... 19 10. Coordination ........................................................................................................................... 20 Annex 1: Yobe state referral mechanism/pathway (simplified version) ....................................... 23 Annex 2: Consent form ..................................................................................................................... 24 Annex 3: UNFPA Supported Health Facilities in Yobe State. ....................................................... 25 Annex 4: Health Facilities being supported by UNICEF in Yobe ................................................. 27 Annex 5: UNFPA Participant’s list for Health Training in Yobe ................................................. 29 Annex 7: Participant’s list for CMR ................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 2 1. Introduction The Gender-Based Violence (GBV) Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) is developed to facilitate joint referral pathway for women, men, boys and girls at risk in the humanitarian operation, including Reception Centers, camps and host communities where the IDPs live. Gender Based Violence (GBV) is a life threatening protection, health, and human rights issue that can have devastating impact on women and children in particular, as well as families and communities. Standard Operating Procedures are developed to facilitate joint action by all actors to respond to GBV in a humanitarian crisis setting. It describes clear procedures, roles, and responsibilities for all actors. Furthermore all organizations listed above agree to the same procedures, guiding principles and working together for the best interest of women, men, boys and girls in the humanitarian setting in YOBE state. These SOPs, initially drafted in April 2016, are updated and expanded to reflect more comprehensive prevention and response interventions. The members agreed to review the SOPs bi-annually. ACRONYMS USED CAN Christian Association of Nigeria CBO Community-Based Organization CCCM Camp Coordination and Camp Management CCS Caring for Child Survivors CCSAS Clinical Management for sexual assault survivors CMR Clinical Management of Rape FBO Faith Based Organizations FHI360 Family Health International 360° FIDA International Federation of Women Lawyers, FOMWAN Federation of Muslim Women's Associations in Nigeria GBV Gender-Based Violence GBVIMS Gender-Based Violence Information Management System HIV/AIDS Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee IDP Internally Displaced Person IEC Information Education Communication INGO International Non-Governmental Organization IPV Intimate Partner Violence LGA Local Government Area MISP Minimum Initial Service Package MoH Ministry of Health MoJ Ministry of Justice MHPSS Mental Health and Psychosocial Support MSF Médecins Sans Frontière MWA&SD Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Development NEMA National Emergency Management Agency NCWS National Council of Women Societies NGO Non-Governmental Organization NPF Nigeria Police Force PEP Post-Exposure Prophylaxis PSEA Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse RH Reproductive Health SEA Sexual Exploitation and Abuse SGBV Sexual and Gender-Based Violence 3 SOP Standard Operating Procedures TOR Terms of Reference TOTs Training of Trainers UN United Nations UNHCR UN High Commissioner for Refugees UNFPA UN Population Fund UNICEF UN Children’s Fund WG Working Group 5Ws Who, What, Where When Why 4 2. Setting and Persons of Concern These SOPs have been developed for use in the following settings: IDPs camps and Host communities in YOBE State. 3. Definitions and Terms Actor(s) refers to individuals, groups, organizations, and institutions involved in preventing and responding to gender based violence. Gender based violence (GBV) is an umbrella term for any harmful act that is perpetrated against a person’s will, and that is based on socially ascribed (gender) differences between males and females. Acts of GBV violate a number of universal human rights protected by international instruments and conventions. Incident refers to the specific act of gender based violence or rights violation. Survivor: Refers to any person woman, man or child who suffers any act of violence or rights violation. Perpetrator: Refers to any person woman, man or child who commits or alleged to have committed an act of gender based violence. GBV Classification Types 1. The GBV classifications relate directly to the GBV Information Management System (GBVIMS), and has the following tools: Incident classification Tool: standardizes incidents, making the data easy to compile, compare and analyze. 2. Intake and Consent Form: collects information from survivors and protects survivors control over information 3. Incident recorder : An excel database that gathers corresponding information from the intake form and automatically generates data(Please note that the IDP location await the roll out of the GBVIMS) 4. Information Sharing Protocol: regulates the sharing of GBV data with other actors such as coordinating agencies. The classification types are: 1. Rape 2. Sexual assault 3. Physical assault 4. Forced marriage 5. Denial of resources or opportunities or services 6. Psychological /Emotional Abuse Rape: non-consensual penetration (however slight) of the vagina, anus or mouth with a penis or other body part. Also includes penetration of the vagina or anus with an object. Sexual Assault: any form of non-consensual sexual contact that does not result in or include penetration. Examples include: attempted rape, as well as unwanted kissing, fondling, or touching of genitalia and buttocks. This incident type does not include rape,
Recommended publications
  • Nigeria's Constitution of 1999
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 constituteproject.org Nigeria's Constitution of 1999 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 Table of contents Preamble . 5 Chapter I: General Provisions . 5 Part I: Federal Republic of Nigeria . 5 Part II: Powers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria . 6 Chapter II: Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy . 13 Chapter III: Citizenship . 17 Chapter IV: Fundamental Rights . 20 Chapter V: The Legislature . 28 Part I: National Assembly . 28 A. Composition and Staff of National Assembly . 28 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of National Assembly . 29 C. Qualifications for Membership of National Assembly and Right of Attendance . 32 D. Elections to National Assembly . 35 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 36 Part II: House of Assembly of a State . 40 A. Composition and Staff of House of Assembly . 40 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of House of Assembly . 41 C. Qualification for Membership of House of Assembly and Right of Attendance . 43 D. Elections to a House of Assembly . 45 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 47 Chapter VI: The Executive . 50 Part I: Federal Executive . 50 A. The President of the Federation . 50 B. Establishment of Certain Federal Executive Bodies . 58 C. Public Revenue . 61 D. The Public Service of the Federation . 63 Part II: State Executive . 65 A. Governor of a State . 65 B. Establishment of Certain State Executive Bodies .
    [Show full text]
  • Borno State, Nearly Tarmuwa Magumeri Kala/ Fune Jere Mafa 60 000 People Face the Threat of Famine Balge Nangere Dikwa (Phase 5)
    N°32 SAHEL AND MAPSMARCH & FACTS 2016 WEST AFRICA Club No 44, November 2016 ONE OUT OF THREE PEOPLE IN NORTHEASTERN NIGERIA FACED WITH ACUTE FOOD INSECURITY August-September 2016 ccording to the fi ndings of the 1 Lake A Cadre harmonisé analysis of Abadam Yusufari Chad August 2016, some 4.4 million people in Yunusari Machina Mobbar Kukawa northeastern Nigeria were facing acute Nguru Karasuwa Guzamala food insecurity (phases 3-5) requiring Bade Borsari Mobbar urgent humanitarian assistance. In Bade Geidam Nganzai Monguro the worst affected and less acces- Jakusko Marte Yobe Ngala sible pockets of Borno state, nearly Tarmuwa Magumeri Kala/ Fune Jere Mafa 60 000 people face the threat of famine Balge Nangere Dikwa (phase 5). Boko Haram attacks and Damaturu Kaga Maiduguru Potiskum Konduga Bama suicide bombings continue to cause Fika Gujba fatalities and large-scale population Borno Gwoza displacement. This has had a negative Damboa Gulani impact on food consumption and Biu Chibok Madagali livelihood activities within both Askira/Uba Kwaya Michika displaced and host community house- Kusar Hawul Hong Bayo Mubi North holds. The situation continues to Shani Girie be particularly alarming in Borno, Mubi South Shelleng Maina Adamawa and Yobe which host large Song Adamawa numbers of internally displaced Lamurde people (IDPs). According to the Inter- Numan Gombi Demsa Yola North national Organization for Migration’s Yola South (IOM) June 2016 report, there are over Fufore Mayo- 1.4 million IDPs in Borno, 159 445 in Lake Abadam Bel Yusufari Chad Jada Yunusari Machina Mobbar Kukawa Adamawa and 111 671 in Yobe. New Phases of food insecurity Nguru Karasuwa Guzamala Bade Borsari Mobbar Bade Geidam Nganzai Monguro Jakusko Marte Yobe Ngala Tarmuwa Magumeri Kala/ Fune Jere Mafa Balge Nangere Dikwa Damaturu Kaga Maiduguru Potiskum Konduga Bama Fika arrivals of IDPs put additional stress Gujba Borno Gwoza Phase 1: Minimal Gulani Damboa Ganye Biu Chibok Madagali Askira/Uba Kwaya Michika Kusar Hawul Hong Bayo Mubi North Shani Girie Mubi South Shelleng Maina on host communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought Occurrences and Its Implications on the Households in Yobe State, Nigeria Jude Nwafor Eze
    Eze Geoenvironmental Disasters (2018) 5:18 Geoenvironmental Disasters https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-018-0111-7 RESEARCH Open Access Drought occurrences and its implications on the households in Yobe state, Nigeria Jude Nwafor Eze Abstract The study assesses the extent of droughts and its implications on the households in the study area. This is to highlight the need to integrate drought adaptation options into the government development plans. Strategies for drought adaptation options in the study area have often been made without experimental foundations placed on the extent of drought and its implications on the households. To achieve this, the study employed Normalized Rainfall Index (NRI) to determine the extent of droughts and its implications on the households, which has much to offer in terms of policy decisions. The study also utilized questionnaire administrated to 400 households to determine the annual income from different occupations that yielded more income to the people in the study area using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The NRI shows that the study area was characterized by mild to severe drought events. The first (1986–1995) and third (2006–2017) decades experienced high incidences of droughts, while the second decade (1996–2005), witnessed the least incidences of droughts. The result of the economic activities of the households reveals that 65% of the total household respondents were involved in farming, while 35% were involved in non-farming activities as their major source of livelihood. The analysis of variance on the economic activities that generated more income to the households in Yobe State shows that farming activities provided more opportunities for income generation.
    [Show full text]
  • States and Lcdas Codes.Cdr
    PFA CODES 28 UKANEFUN KPK AK 6 CHIBOK CBK BO 8 ETSAKO-EAST AGD ED 20 ONUIMO KWE IM 32 RIMIN-GADO RMG KN KWARA 9 IJEBU-NORTH JGB OG 30 OYO-EAST YYY OY YOBE 1 Stanbic IBTC Pension Managers Limited 0021 29 URU OFFONG ORUKO UFG AK 7 DAMBOA DAM BO 9 ETSAKO-WEST AUC ED 21 ORLU RLU IM 33 ROGO RGG KN S/N LGA NAME LGA STATE 10 IJEBU-NORTH-EAST JNE OG 31 SAKI-EAST GMD OY S/N LGA NAME LGA STATE 2 Premium Pension Limited 0022 30 URUAN DUU AK 8 DIKWA DKW BO 10 IGUEBEN GUE ED 22 ORSU AWT IM 34 SHANONO SNN KN CODE CODE 11 IJEBU-ODE JBD OG 32 SAKI-WEST SHK OY CODE CODE 3 Leadway Pensure PFA Limited 0023 31 UYO UYY AK 9 GUBIO GUB BO 11 IKPOBA-OKHA DGE ED 23 ORU-EAST MMA IM 35 SUMAILA SML KN 1 ASA AFN KW 12 IKENNE KNN OG 33 SURULERE RSD OY 1 BADE GSH YB 4 Sigma Pensions Limited 0024 10 GUZAMALA GZM BO 12 OREDO BEN ED 24 ORU-WEST NGB IM 36 TAKAI TAK KN 2 BARUTEN KSB KW 13 IMEKO-AFON MEK OG 2 BOSARI DPH YB 5 Pensions Alliance Limited 0025 ANAMBRA 11 GWOZA GZA BO 13 ORHIONMWON ABD ED 25 OWERRI-MUNICIPAL WER IM 37 TARAUNI TRN KN 3 EDU LAF KW 14 IPOKIA PKA OG PLATEAU 3 DAMATURU DTR YB 6 ARM Pension Managers Limited 0026 S/N LGA NAME LGA STATE 12 HAWUL HWL BO 14 OVIA-NORTH-EAST AKA ED 26 26 OWERRI-NORTH RRT IM 38 TOFA TEA KN 4 EKITI ARP KW 15 OBAFEMI OWODE WDE OG S/N LGA NAME LGA STATE 4 FIKA FKA YB 7 Trustfund Pensions Plc 0028 CODE CODE 13 JERE JRE BO 15 OVIA-SOUTH-WEST GBZ ED 27 27 OWERRI-WEST UMG IM 39 TSANYAWA TYW KN 5 IFELODUN SHA KW 16 ODEDAH DED OG CODE CODE 5 FUNE FUN YB 8 First Guarantee Pension Limited 0029 1 AGUATA AGU AN 14 KAGA KGG BO 16 OWAN-EAST
    [Show full text]
  • April – June 2020
    Nigeria: Yobe - Health Sector Reporting Partners (April - June, 2020) Number of Local Reporting PARTNERS PER TYPE OF ORGANIZATIONS BREAKDOWN OF PEOPLE REACHED PER CATEGORY Government Area Partners NGOs/UN People Reached PiN/Target IDP Returnee Host 08 Agencies Community 17 Partners including 204,102 LGAs with ongoing International NGOs and activities 87,507 10,531 165 76,811 UN Agencies 4/4 151,047 KARASUWA (1 Partner) YUSUFARI (2 Partners) YUNUSARI (1 Partner) WHO PLAN, WHO WHO REACHED: 713 REACHED: 1,558 REACHED: 3,377 MACHINA (1 Partner) YUSUFARI GEIDAM (1 Partner) WHO YUNUSARI WHO NGURU REACHED: 1,068 MACHINA REACHED: 6,539 KARASUWA BADE BURSARI (2 Partners) NGURU (2 Partners) BURSARI PLAN, WHO PLAN, WHO BADE GEIDAM REACHED: 2,458 REACHED: 1,715 JAKUSKO TARMUA (2 Partners) BADE (1 Partner) TARMUA WHO AAH, WHO REACHED: 6,625 REACHED: 1,092 DAMATURU NANGERE DAMATURU (5 Partners) JAKUSKO (1 Partner) POTISKUM IRC, PLAN, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO WHO FUNE REACHED: 9,705 REACHED: 1,815 FIKA GUJBA GUJBA (5 Partners) NANGERE (2 Partners) AAH, IOM, IRC, UNICEF, WHO AAH, WHO GULANI Number of Organizations REACHED: 24,292 REACHED: 5,525 0 5 GULANI (3 Partners)P POTISKUM (2 Partners) IOM, UNICEF, WHO RHHF, UNFPA REACHED: 17,229 REACHED: 23 FIKA (1 Partner) FUNE (2 Partners) .WHO PLAN, WHO REACHED: 2,769 REACHED: 1,105 ORGANIZATION ACRONYMS AAH Action Against Hunger YOBE Reached Benificiaries by Age CRS Catholic Relief Services Number of Individuals Displaced FHI 360 Family Health International by Insurgency 127,613 24,000 IFRC International Federation of Red Cross 20,000 IRC International Rescue Commitee 16,000 Estimated Number of IDPs 12,000 MSF - Spain Medecin Sans Frontieres Spain 133,183 8,000 UNFPA United Nations Population Fund 4,000 UNICEF United Nations Children's Education Fund Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Women Men Women Men Children (Under 1 years) Children (1 - 5 years) Children (6 - 17 years) Adults (18 - 59 years) Elderly (60+ years) WHO World Health Organization * DTM baseline assessment round XXXI OUR PARTNERS.
    [Show full text]
  • Yobe State Situation Analysis June 2020
    Yobe State Humanitarian Situation Analysis | 1 Nigeria-Yobe State Humanitarian Situation Analysis As of 30 June 2020 Context Humanitarian needs in Yobe State increased marginally Targeted People for Humanitarian Aid in 2020 during the reporting period, mainly as a result of an upsurge in attacks by non-state armed groups (NSAG) and clashes between them and government forces displacing local populations. Hazards affecting civilian populations include improvised explosive devices and unexploded ordinance, flash flooding, and COVID-19 pandemic. Flash flooding and windstorms destroyed nearly 400 houses, six public facilities and claimed at least eight lives across the LGAs during the reporting period marking the onset of the rainy season. Populations from inaccessible areas in Yobe and northern Borno State, and Nigerian refugees from the Niger Republic continue to arrive in Gujba, Damaturu, Gashua, and Geidam local government areas (LGAs), due to an upsurge in violence in those areas. The impacts on essential available services due to the influx of new arrivals and the COVID-19 aggravate the situation facing the communities. Also, given stigmatization of people with COVID-19 and an increase in cases in host communities, there are fears that new arrivals, including IDPs and returnee-refugees, might face rejection for fear that they might bring and spread COVID-19. This could potentially result in increased vulnerability for people displaced and returnees. Mitigations strategies such as the Government-imposed border closure and movement restrictions to contain the spread of COVID-19 continue to disrupt agricultural activities and markets. The impact on livelihoods and the economy underlines the need for proactive actions to set up mechanisms that will improve the economic impact of the pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • BRIEF HISTORY Yobe State Was Curved out of the Defunct Borno State in 1991. the State Covers an Estimated Area of 47,153 Square
    YOBE BRIEF HISTORY Yobe State was curved out of the defunct Borno State in 1991. The state covers an estimated area of 47,153 square kilometer and shares international boundary to the north with the Republic of Niger, to the west with Jigawa and Bauchi states, to the east with Borno State, and to the south with Borno and Gombe states. The northern part of the state is characterized by desert, active sand dunes and difficult terrain, while the southern part is mountainous and undulating hills. Yobe State has a population of 2,321,591 as per the national head count of 2006. The major spoken languages are English, Kanuri, Hausa and Fulfulde. The state has 17 Local Government Areas, and with 14 Emirate Councils. The Emir of Fika is the Chairman of tghe Traditional Council of Chiefs. SENATORIAL DISTRICTS S/N DISTRICT COMPOSITION RA PU COLLATION CENTRE 103 Yobe East Bursari/Damaturu/Geidam/Gujb 74 644 Federal Polytechnic SD/103/YB a/Gulani/Tarmuwa/Yunusari Damaturu 104 Yobe North Bade/Jakusko/Karasuwa/Machin 60 517 College Of Education a/Nguru/Yusufari Gashua 105 Yobe South Fika/Fune/Nangere/Potiskum 44 553 FCE (Tech) Potiskum FEDERAL CONSTITUENCIES S/N CONSTITUENCY LGA COMPOSITION RA PU COLLATION CENTRE 346 Bade/Jakusko Bade/Jakusko 20 183 GSS. Gashua FC/346/YB 347 Bursari/Geidam/Yunusari Bursari/Geidam/Yunusari 31 303 GSS, Geidam 348 Damauru/Tarmuwa/Gujb Damaturu/Tarmuwa/Gujba/Gul 43 341 Federal Secretariat, /Gulani ani Damaturu 349 Fika/Fune Fika/Fune 23 258 GSS, Damagum 350 Karasuwa/Machina/Ngur Karasuwa/Machina/Nguru/Yus 40 334 Govt.
    [Show full text]
  • YOBE STATE MINISTRY of HEALTH Situation Report
    YOBE STATE MINISTRY OF HEALTH Situation Report TITLE COVID-19 Pandemic Situation Report SERIAL NUMBER 173 EPID-WEEK 27 DATE 5 – 11 July 2021 HIGHLIGHTS: No new confirmed case was reported in week 27 The total number of confirmed COVID-19 cases remains four hundred and ninety-nine (499) Sample testing is stalled due to the stock-out of the testing reagents for nearly 5 weeks. 1472 samples have been taken to the National Reference Laboratory in Abuja. Sample results are pending Yobe SPHCMB has completed the administration of the second dose of Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine in all 17 LGAs of the state including the security-compromised LGAs From 29 May - 7 July 2021, 18,866 people were provided with the second dose. This represents about 64% of people vaccinated with the first dose of the vaccine (29,528) across the state. So far, 275 non- serious AEFIs were reported. No serious AEFI % of First Dose Recipients AEFI Total Vaccinated (1st Total Vaccinated Vaccinated with the LGA Dose) (2nd Dose) Second Dose Serious Non-Serious Bade 2052 1,284 63% 0 24 Bursari 742 602 81% 0 7 Damaturu 3216 1,710 53% 0 16 Fika 2951 1,869 63% 0 17 Fune 1219 831 68% 0 3 Geidam 1343 619 46% 0 0 Gujba 1324 946 71% 0 20 Gulani 1393 1,132 81% 0 41 Jakusko 1795 1,214 68% 0 3 Karasuwa 1606 1,363 85% 0 11 Machina 959 728 76% 0 30 Nangere 1082 929 86% 0 35 Nguru 1759 1,036 59% 0 37 Potiskum 4080 1,947 48% 0 3 Tarmuwa 649 607 94% 0 4 Yunusari 1780 919 52% 0 3 Yusufari 1578 1,130 72% 0 21 Total/Average 29528 18,866 64% 0 275 Yobe SMOH in collaboration with the FMOH Ministerial Expert Advisory Committee on COVID-19 (MEACoC) and WHO, completed sample collection as part of the national ‘Population-Based Age- Stratified Seroprevalence Survey in 12 states with high- and low-burden of COVID-19 infection’ in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Sightsavers Deworming Program, Nigeria –Yobe State
    Sightsavers deworming program, Nigeria –Yobe State GiveWell: schistosomiasis (SCH) and soil transmitted helminths (STH) project Year two annual report: April 2018 – March 2019 Country: Nigeria Location (region/districts): Yobe State Project goal: The reduction in the prevalence and intensity of schistosomiasis (SCH) in school age children. Project summary Yobe state is situated in the North-East geopolitical zone and has 17 Local Government Areas (LGAs) with an estimated population of 3,122,280 (2018). It shares borders with Borno state to the East, Gombe state to the South, Bauchi and Jigawa states to the West and Niger Republic to the North. The state began its NTD activities in 1996 with the control of onchocerciasis in 12 LGAs. It has since expanded its activities to include control/elimination programmes for lymphatic filariasis (LF), trachoma and sporadic SCH treatments. GiveWell funding has allowed the state to scale-up the SCH activities to meet WHO standards. None of the LGAs are above the WHO-defined prevalence thresholds for soil transmitted helminths (STH) mass drug administration (MDA). April 2018 – March 2019 is the first year of GiveWell funded implementation in Yobe state, despite being in the second year of the overall GiveWell deworming programme. Yobe is one of the four Nigerian states supported by the NGOs CBM and HANDS in the implementation of NTD programmes. Sightsavers implements the Yobe deworming project through these NGO partners at the request of the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH), who identified the funding gap and requested Sightsavers’ support. The result of parasitological surveys conducted in the state in 2013 and 2016 indicated all 17 LGAs are endemic for SCH, with eight at low (≥0 but <10%) and nine at moderate (≥10 but <50%) risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Sector Needs Assessment (Msna)
    MULTI-SECTOR NEEDS ASSESSMENT MSNA | 2020 Yobe State (MSNA) KEY FINDINGS Nigeria CONTEXT METHODOLOGY North East Nigeria continues to experience This Yobe State factsheet presents composite enumerators then undertook the household significant humanitarian needs after over 11 analysis at the multi-sectoral and sectoral level survey on the phone with the respondents. years of conflict affecting the Lake Chad region. for six key sectors: Food Security & Livelihoods Where there was weak or no phone signal, the The 2020 Humanitarian Needs Overview (FSL), Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH), household surveys were conducted face to face, (HNO) identified 7.9 million individuals in the Health, Shelter and Non-Food Items (SNFI), following strict COVID-19 protocols. three states of Borno, Adamawa and Yobe Education and Protection. This analysis includes (collectively, the “BAY” states) to be in need of the intersection of Living Standards Gaps Five LGAs in Borno State were not assessed humanitarian assistance.1 (LSGs), Capacity Gaps (CGs) and vulnerability. due to security concerns and are considered inaccessible to most humanitarian actors. To respond to persisting information gaps on Data collection took place between the 13th For the remaining 45 LGAs in the BAY states, humanitarian needs severity and to inform July and 21st August, with a total of 6,888 household surveys were conducted remotely response planning, United Nations Office for household surveys being conducted across the by phone with snowball sampling from contacts Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)’s BAY states. provided by past MSNA key informants. Inter-Sector Working Group (ISWG), with support from REACH, conducted a Multi-Sector OCHA identified 15 priority Local Government The findings presented in this factsheet are state- Needs Assessment (MSNA) in the BAY States.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria: Yobe State Weekly Situation Report No
    Nigeria: Yobe State Weekly Situation Report No. 11 20 August 2021 This report is compiled by OCHA Nigeria in collaboration with humanitarian partners. Calculation of IDPs does not include recent displacements from Geidam and Yunusari Local Government Areas. Government estimates that about 54,000 IDPs from the two LGAs are still in the places of displacement across 11 LGAs in Yobe while an estimated 126,000 individuals have returned. HIGHLIGHTS • As the lean season and rainy season progresses, food insecurity in Yobe state is also rising. LGAs in the state that are hard to reach are the most vulnerable. • The number of Acute Watery Diarrhea (AWD)/Cholera cases continue to rise with 671 cases reported on 20 August 2021. • The Yobe State Government led the World Humanitarian Day celebration on 19 August 2021 along with humanitarian partners in Yobe. • A total of 2,899 households (17,394 persons) living in lowland communities across 11 local government areas (LGAs) in Yobe State have been affected by severe flooding. SITUATION OVERVIEW Increasing vulnerability resulting in rising levels of hunger The combination of conflict, COVID-19, increased food prices and the effects of climate change are pushing people to resort to negative coping mechanisms. This is detrimentally affecting livelihoods and access to food, whether it is the reduction of people’s buying power due to the economic downturn, security instability preventing people from planting and harvesting in open fields, or the condition of the soil and environment due to climate change. Localized herder/farmer conflicts in 8 Local Government Areas (LGAs) in 2020 resulted in the destruction of crops and population displacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Yobe OP Map Dec 2018
    Damaturu CHILD PROTECTION SUB SECTOR OPERATIONAL PRESENCE MAP - DECEMBER 2018 Tarmua YOBE STATE, NORTH EAST, NIGERIA Bursari Nguru CHAD/ UNICEF SMYSSCD, Yobe/ UNICEF Kalallawa Gabai SMYSSCD, Yobe/ UNICEF Legend for Child Protec�on Core Commitments Kukareta Warsala Provision of psychosocial support Case management of UASC and children at risk Socio Economics reintegration assistance for former CAAG and SGBV survivors Yusufari Yunusari Damaturu Mine Risk Education Toshia Damakasu Njiwaji Gwange Dilala Bindigari Pawari Yunusari Damaturu Central Yunusari Zabudum Dachia Fune Nayinawa Machina Kafiya COOPI/ UNICEF Ngelzarma A Maisandari Wi Nguru Karasuwa Asheikri 1 Zango Masaba Mozogun Hausari Asheikri 2 Gambir Moduri Dawayo Katuzu Jororo Balle Murfakalam Bayamari Bade Bade Ma'Anna Bursari COOPI/ UNICEF Geidam SMYSSCD, Yobe/ UNICEF Geidam COOPI/ UNICEF Bade Gujba Ngurbuwa Kusur Gujba Gumsa Dapchi Buni Gari Jakusko Jumbam Damaturu CHAD/ UNICEF COOPI/ UNICEF DRC/ DDG Tarmua Tarmua SMYSSCD, Yobe/ UNICEF IRC Babangida SMYSSCD, Yobe/ UNICEF Kayeri Fune SMYSSCD, Yobe/ UNICEF Kalallawa Gabai Nangere Nangere Kukareta Warsala SMYSSCD, Yobe/ UNICEF Nangere Fune Damaturu Njiwaji GwangeDamakasu Mamudo Nayinawa Potiskum Dogon Nini Maisandari Wi YerimaramPotiskum ChilariyeBare Bari Ngelzarma A Gambir Moduri COOPI/ UNICEF Murfakalam Ngojin SMYSSCD, Yobe/ UNICEF Ngurbuwa Janga Goniri Garu Gujba Fika Gujba Fika CHAD/ UNICEF COOPI/ UNICEF Gujba DRC/ DDG Gudi Dozi Gadaka Wagir IOM Shoye Mutai Fika Anze Buni Yadi NEYIF/ Street Child Mubi Fussami NEYIF/ UNICEF SMYSSCD,
    [Show full text]