DOCSLIB.ORG

Hilary of Poitiers and the Concept of Divine Personhood Ann Thorp A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Hilary of Poitiers and the Concept of Divine Personhood Ann Thorp A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Otago Dunedin, New Zealand September 2018 In loving memory of my mother Abstract The primary focus of this dissertation is the development of the notion of divine personhood in the writings of Hilary of Poitiers, doctor and bishop of the Church. The impetus for this study was my Licence thesis, where I first discovered Hilary and began exploring his profound contribution to the understanding of the Trinity in the early Church.1 This initial thesis has served as an important foundation for my further understanding of Hilary’s doctrine, which is expressed in this doctorate. Although Hilary never set out to present a systematic understanding of the divine persons, in his efforts to combat Arianism, and Sabellianism, this is what he effectively did, primarily in relation to the Father and the Son.2 I have chosen to approach his Trinitarian theology through this lens in order to bring out the fundamental insights and contributions, which he made to the development of doctrine. The significance of these, as I show, can be seen in the manner in which they were taken up and developed by important theologians such as Augustine and Aquinas. In chapter 1, I give an account of the milieu in which Hilary flourished, focusing on the reasons behind the theological crisis which characterised this period, and the significance of the council of Nicaea. In this chapter, I also provide an overview of Hilary’s life, which was greatly impacted by the Arian crisis; and in chapter 2, I summarize his most important doctrinal work, De Trinitate, which he wrote in response to this crisis. Given that this is the primary source of information for this study, included in my summary is an examination of the methodology which Hilary employed in writing this treatise. Chapters 3-8 encompass the main body of this dissertation. In these, I analyse in detail Hilary’s Trinitarian theology, focusing on his development of the notion of divine personhood. In chapter 3, I explore Hilary’s understanding of the divine nature, which is intrinsically linked to his concept of divine personhood; while chapter 4 serves as an introduction to chapters 5-7. In chapters 5 and 6, I examine Hilary’s notion of divine 1 Ann Thorp, “Substantia and Persona in Hilary of Poitiers’ De Trinitate”, Licence Thesis (University of the Holy Cross, 2011). 2 I use the term Sabellianism throughout this thesis to depict the heretical view that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are not three subsistant persons but rather different modes of the one Godhead. I have chosen this term as Sabellius is mentiond by name in some of the documents from the mid-fourth century such as those drafted at the council of Antioch in 345. (For example, see anathema 6 of the Ekthesis Makrostichos, Athanasius, Syn. 26). v vi personhood in terms of the Father and the Son, and in chapter 7, their unity within the one divine substance. In chapters 8 and 9, I examine Hilary’s pneumatology. This is a challenging task, given that the Holy Spirit is not the main focus of his theology, and thus his pneumatology is not developed extensively. Furthermore, Hilary does not always express his views on the Spirit clearly and coherently. In order to understand Hilary’s pneumatology, I begin my analysis in chapter 8 with a review of the influences upon Hilary’s thought, followed by an extensive examination of the phenomenon known as Spirit Christology, which is prevalent in his works. This phenomenon is characterised by the use of the term spiritus in reference to the Holy Spirit as well as the Father, the Son and the divine nature, and was prevalent from the 2nd to the 4th century. Such a practice often led to ambiguity in the presentation of doctrine, as it does at times in Hilary’s writings, and has been associated by some scholars with binitarianism. Using the understanding gained in chapter 8, I examine Hilary’s perception of the person and being of the Holy Spirit in chapter 9. Finally, I draw the results of my analysis together, and present Hilary’s most significant insights into the divine personhood of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, showing the importance of this concept to the resolution of the Arian crisis. Table of Contents Contents Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... v Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................... vii Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ xi Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. xiii Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1. Hilary & the Fourth Century Theological Crisis .................................................................... 3 I. The Fourth Century Milieu ..................................................................................... 3 II. A Crisis Emerges .................................................................................................... 4 III. The Council of Nicaea ............................................................................................ 5 IV. The Aftermath ......................................................................................................... 6 V. The Different Theological Trends ........................................................................... 7 VI. Terminological Confusion .................................................................................... 13 VII. The Decades Following Nicaea ............................................................................ 15 VIII. The Life of Hilary ................................................................................................. 18 A. From Birth to the Synod of Beziers ....................................................................... 18 B. The Synod of Beziers ............................................................................................. 19 C. In Exile ................................................................................................................... 21 D. The Return to Gaul ................................................................................................. 22 E. Hilary’s Life – A Summary .................................................................................... 23 IX. Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 23 2. De Trinitate – Composition and Content ............................................................................. 25 I. De Trinitate - Composition ................................................................................... 25 II. Introduction to De Trinitate .................................................................................. 27 III. Aim........................................................................................................................ 28 IV. Methodology ......................................................................................................... 29 A. Scriptural and Liturgical Foundations .................................................................... 29 B. The Triune God in Matthew’s Baptismal Formula ................................................ 30 C. Philosophical Principles ......................................................................................... 30 D. The “Obedience of Faith” ...................................................................................... 32 vii E. The Role of Analogy in Hilary’s Thought ............................................................. 33 F. Defeating the Heretics ........................................................................................... 33 V. De Trinitate, De synodis and the Council of Nicaea ............................................ 34 VI. De Trinitate - a Dialogue with God ...................................................................... 35 VII. Content of De Trinitate ........................................................................................ 36 A. Book 1 .................................................................................................................... 36 B. Books 2 & 3 ........................................................................................................... 36 C. Books 4-6 ............................................................................................................... 37 D. Books 7-12 ............................................................................................................. 38 E. Summary ................................................................................................................ 39 3. The Nature of God ............................................................................................................... 41 I. “I am who am” ...................................................................................................... 41 II. The Attributes of the Divine Nature ..................................................................... 42 III. Defending the Divinity of Christ .........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Brethren of the Lord and Two Recently Published Papyri John J

    The Brethren of the Lord and Two Recently Published Papyri John J

    THE BRETHREN OF THE LORD AND TWO RECENTLY PUBLISHED PAPYRI JOHN J. COLLINS, S.J. Weston College s~> ATHOLics agree and disagree about the brethren of the Lord. They ^ disagree on the question who exactly were the parents of these near relatives of the Savior. They all agree that they are not sons of the Blessed Mother, a truth which is an obvious conclusion from the dogma of the perpetual virginity of our Lady and which is firmly proved by Scripture and tradition. My present purpose is to present briefly the arguments from Scripture and the early tradition of the Church which show that the brethren of the Lord cannot be children of our Lady. At the end of the article I shall discuss two recently pub­ lished papyri which exemplify the use of the word brother in the sense of near relative. THE NEW TESTAMENT TEXTS First let us examine the texts, as they are found in the Gospels, the Acts, and the Epistles. We can collect the following data. From the Annunciation until the end of the hidden life at Nazareth there is no mention of any brethren. In the public life these brethren appear four times. The first occasion is after the miracle at the marriage feast of Cana. Jesus' mother and brethren and disciples went down to Cap- harnaum and stayed there some days (John 2:12). The second inci­ dent occurred once while the Savior was speaking to the crowds. His mother and brethren were standing outside and sought to speak to Him (Matt. 12;46-50; Mark 3:31-35; Luke 8:19-21).
  • NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories by Socrates Scholasticus

    NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories by Socrates Scholasticus

    NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories by Socrates Scholasticus Christian Classics Ethereal Library About NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories by Socrates Scholasticus Title: NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf202.html Author(s): Socrates Scholasticus Schaff, Philip (1819-1893) (Editor) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Print Basis: New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886 Source: Logos Inc. Rights: Copyright Christian Classics Ethereal Library Status: This volume has been carefully proofread and corrected. CCEL Subjects: All; Proofed; Early Church; LC Call no: BR60 LC Subjects: Christianity Early Christian Literature. Fathers of the Church, etc. NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories Socrates Scholasticus Table of Contents About This Book. p. ii Title Page.. p. 1 The Ecclesiastical History of Socrates Scholasticus.. p. 2 Title Page.. p. 2 Prefatory Note.. p. 2 Introduction.. p. 3 Sources and Literature.. p. 3 Life of Socrates.. p. 4 Socrates© Ecclesiastical History.. p. 11 History of Socrates© Work.. p. 17 Book I. p. 19 Introduction to the Work.. p. 19 By what Means the Emperor Constantine became a Christian.. p. 20 While Constantine favors the Christians, Licinius, his Colleague, persecutes them.. p. 22 War arises between Constantine and Licinius on Account of the Christians.. p. 22 The Dispute of Arius with Alexander, his Bishop.. p. 23 Division begins in the Church from this Controversy; and Alexander Bishop of Alexandria excommunicates Arius and his Adherents.. p. 24 The Emperor Constantine being grieved at the Disturbance of the Churches, sends Hosius the Spaniard to Alexandria, exhorting the Bishop and Arius to Reconciliation and Unity.
  • THE CATHOLIC CHARISMATIC RENEWAL Pope Francis’ Assessment of Its Challenges

    THE CATHOLIC CHARISMATIC RENEWAL Pope Francis’ Assessment of Its Challenges

    THE CATHOLIC CHARISMATIC RENEWAL Pope Francis’ Assessment of its Challenges FRANK CUMBO A note to the reader: the direct quotes from cernment of the guidance and inspiration of Pope Francis’ address in this article are taken the Holy Spirit. Pope Francis borrows the from the English translation of the address phrase ‘the danger of getting too organised’ provided in the papal documents section of the to refer to this first factor contributing to the Vatican website. For ease of reading, text from disharmony in the contemporary CCR, but it this source has been placed in quotation marks is perhaps more readily understood as the ex- but is not succeeded by parentheses specifying ecutive approach to leadership. The pontiff its source. All other direct quotes have their contends that adopting this approach causes sources specified in this way. a leader in the CCR to think ‘of himself or herself as being more important or greater A First Look at the Text than the others’. In place of this executive model of leadership, Pope Francis’ address Pope Francis’ June 2014 address to the 37th promotes a return to the servant leadership National Convocation of Renewal in the Holy model which characterised the early CCR. He Spirit challenges leaders of the Catholic argues that this latter model allows the Holy Charismatic Renewal, hereafter termed the Spirit to lead the CCR and therefore promotes CCR, to abandon attitudes and practices which harmony ‘because unity comes from the Holy the pontiff contends have contributed to Spirit’. ‘infighting’ within and amongst CCR groups. The second divisive attitude which Pope Given the brevity of this address and its focus Francis discusses is related to the first.
  • V Demig 61311511311 Xterature Nmem. Edited by Professor George

    V Demig 61311511311 Xterature Nmem. Edited by Professor George

    E AR LY CHR I ST I AN L I T E RAT UR E P R I ME R S . T H E A P OS T OL I C FAT H E R S AND T H E AP OL OGI S T S O F T H E S ECON D E NT U R Y - 1 80 C D . , A . 95 T H E FAT H E R S OF T H E I R E N U R Y D 1 80- 2 T H D . C T , A 3 5 T H E - 2 — . P O T E E EE H E 0 N I C N R K T R S D . S G F . III A , A 3 5 75 I n re aration p p . - - P O T E H E R D 2 0. S N I N E T I N T S . C L A FA A . 3 5 59 V dEmI 61115 113 11 xterature n mem g 3 fi fi . d ited b P ro essor GE OR E P G . FI H E R D E S . D y f , . T H E MAR 1 2 1914 P OS T -N I CE N K FAT H E R G R E E S . o E A A KS ON E V G OR GE . C . R . J N E W Y O R K : N D C O M P A N Y D . A P P L E T O N A , I A N D B O N D S R E E .
  • Exiling Bishops: the Policy of Constantius II

    Exiling Bishops: the Policy of Constantius II

    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Classical Studies Faculty Publications Classical Studies 2014 Exiling Bishops: The olicP y of Constantius II Walter Stevenson University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/classicalstudies-faculty- publications Part of the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Stevenson, Walt. "Exiling Bishops: The oP licy of Canstantius II." Dumbarton Oaks Papers 68 (2014): 7-27. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classical Studies at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classical Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Exiling Bishops: The Policy of Constantius II Walt Stevenson onstantius II was forced by circumstances to all instances in which Constantius II exiled bishops Cmake innovations in the policy that his father and focus on a sympathetic reading of his strategy.2 Constantine had followed in exiling bishops. While Though the sources for this period are muddled and ancient tradition has made the father into a sagacious require extensive sorting, a panoramic view of exile saint and the son into a fanatical demon, recent schol- incidents reveals a pattern in which Constantius moved arship has tended to stress continuity between the two past his father’s precedents to mold a new, intelligent regimes.1 This article will attempt to gather
  • Fr Cantalamessa Gives First Advent Reflection to Pope and Roman Curia

    Fr Cantalamessa Gives First Advent Reflection to Pope and Roman Curia

    Fr Cantalamessa gives first Advent reflection to Pope and Roman Curia The Preacher of the Papal Household, Fr Raniero Cantalamessa, gives his first Advent reflection at the Redemptoris Mater Chapel in the Apostolic Palace. Below is the full text of his sermon. P. Raniero Cantalamessa ofmcap BLESSED IS SHE WHO BELIEVED!” Mary in the Annunciation First Advent Sermon 2019 Every year the liturgy leads us to Christmas with three guides: Isaiah, John the Baptist and Mary, the prophet, the precursor, the mother. The first announced the Messiah from afar, the second showed him present in the world, the third bore him in her womb. This Advent I have thought to entrust ourselves entirely to the Mother of Jesus. No one, better than she can prepare us to celebrate the birth of our Redeemer. She didn’t celebrate Advent, she lived it in her flesh. Like every mother bearing a child she knows what it means be waiting for somebody and can help us in approaching Christmas with an expectant faith. We shall contemplate the Mother of God in the three moments in which Scripture presents her at the center of the events: the Annunciation, the Visitation and Christmas. 1. “Behold, / am the handmaid of the Lord” We start with the Annunciation. When Mary went to visit Elizabeth she welcomed Mary with great joy and praised her for her faith saying, “Blessed is she who believed there would be a fulfillment of what was spoken her from the Lord” (Lk 1:45). The wonderful thing that took place in Nazareth after the angel’s greeting was that Mary “believed,” and thus she became the “mother of the Lord.” There is no doubt that the word “believed” refers to Mary’s answer to the angel: “Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word (Lk 1:38).
  • F.F. Bruce, "The Earliest Latin Commentary on the Apocalypse,"

    F.F. Bruce, "The Earliest Latin Commentary on the Apocalypse,"

    F.F. Bruce, “The Earliest Latin Commentary on the Apocalypse,” The Evangelical Quarterly 10 (1938): 352-366. The Earliest Latin Commentary on the Apocalypse F.F. Bruce [p.352] The Book of the Revelation was unanimously recognized by the churches of the West long before the eastern churches made up their minds to accept it as canonical. Various reasons might be suggested for this: at any rate there was something about the book which immediately appealed to the souls of the western Christians and convinced them. of its divinity. It might have been thought that its peculiar Greek would not lend itself readily to translation into Latin but as: a matter of fact; the Vulgate Apocalypse is a masterpiece of literature and comes home to the reader with a charm and a vigour all its own. It is quite in keeping with these fact’s that, the earliest complete commentary on the Apocalypse which has come down to us should be in Latin: Its author was Victorinus, bishop of Poetouio in Upper Pannonia, now Ptuj on the Drava in Yugoslavia (until recently Pettau in Austria). Victorious suffered martyrdom, under Diocletian, probably about the year 303. Before his day others had commented on the Apocalypse, but in Greek. Fragments of exposition appear in the works of Justin Martyr and Irenaeus; Melito of Sardis and Hippolytus of Rome wrote complete commentaries on it (both, unfortunately, lost); while Clement of Alexandria and Origen are also said to have commented on it. So, apart from Clement and Origen, even the earliest Greek commentators on the Apocalypse represent the western churches and the churches of the province of Asia.
  • ABSTRACT the Apostolic Tradition in the Ecclesiastical Histories Of

    ABSTRACT the Apostolic Tradition in the Ecclesiastical Histories Of

    ABSTRACT The Apostolic Tradition in the Ecclesiastical Histories of Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodoret Scott A. Rushing, Ph.D. Mentor: Daniel H. Williams, Ph.D. This dissertation analyzes the transposition of the apostolic tradition in the fifth-century ecclesiastical histories of Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodoret. In the early patristic era, the apostolic tradition was defined as the transmission of the apostles’ teachings through the forms of Scripture, the rule of faith, and episcopal succession. Early Christians, e.g., Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Origen, believed that these channels preserved the original apostolic doctrines, and that the Church had faithfully handed them to successive generations. The Greek historians located the quintessence of the apostolic tradition through these traditional channels. However, the content of the tradition became transposed as a result of three historical movements during the fourth century: (1) Constantine inaugurated an era of Christian emperors, (2) the Council of Nicaea promulgated a creed in 325 A.D., and (3) monasticism emerged as a counter-cultural movement. Due to the confluence of these sweeping historical developments, the historians assumed the Nicene creed, the monastics, and Christian emperors into their taxonomy of the apostolic tradition. For reasons that crystallize long after Nicaea, the historians concluded that pro-Nicene theology epitomized the apostolic message. They accepted the introduction of new vocabulary, e.g. homoousios, as the standard of orthodoxy. In addition, the historians commended the pro- Nicene monastics and emperors as orthodox exemplars responsible for defending the apostolic tradition against the attacks of heretical enemies. The second chapter of this dissertation surveys the development of the apostolic tradition.
  • THE EXEGETICAL ROOTS of TRINITARIAN THEOLOGY MICHAEL SLUSSER Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pa

    THE EXEGETICAL ROOTS of TRINITARIAN THEOLOGY MICHAEL SLUSSER Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pa

    Theological Studies 49 (1988) THE EXEGETICAL ROOTS OF TRINITARIAN THEOLOGY MICHAEL SLUSSER Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pa. N RECENT YEARS systematic theologians have been showing increased I interest in studying the doctrine of the Trinity. An integral part of that study should be an exposition of the origins of the doctrine. The question of origins can be posed in an analytical fashion, as Maurice Wiles has done: .. .we seem forced to choose between three possibilities: either (1) we do after all know about the Trinity through a revelation in the form of propositions concerning the inner mysteries of the Godhead; or (2) there is an inherent threefoldness about every act of God's revelation, which requires us to think in trinitarian terms of the nature of God, even though we cannot speak of the different persons of the Trinity being responsible for specific facets of God's revelation; or (3) our Trinity of revelation is an arbitrary analysis of the activity of God, which though of value in Christian thought and devotion is not of essential significance.1 I think that this analytical approach is in important respects secondary to the genetic one. The first Christians spoke about God in the terms which we now try to analyze; surely the reasons why they used those terms are most relevant to a sound analysis. The main words whose usage needs to be fathomed are the Greek words prosöpon, hypostasis, ousia, andphysis.2 Prosöpon is the earliest of these terms to have attained an accepted conventional usage in early Christian speech about God, and therefore the chief determinant of the shape which the complex of terms was to take.
  • The Assumption of All Humanity in Saint Hilary of Poitiers' Tractatus Super Psalmos

    The Assumption of All Humanity in Saint Hilary of Poitiers' Tractatus Super Psalmos

    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Dissertations (1934 -) Projects The Assumption of All Humanity in Saint Hilary of Poitiers' Tractatus super Psalmos Ellen Scully Marquette University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu Part of the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Scully, Ellen, "The Assumption of All Humanity in Saint Hilary of Poitiers' Tractatus super Psalmos" (2011). Dissertations (1934 -). 95. https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/95 THE ASSUMPTION OF ALL HUMANITY IN SAINT HILARY OF POITIERS’ TRACTATUS SUPER PSALMOS by Ellen Scully A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2011 ABTRACT THE ASSUMPTION OF ALL HUMANITY IN SAINT HILARY OF POITIERS’ TRACTATUS SUPER PSALMOS Ellen Scully Marquette University, 2011 In this dissertation, I focus on the soteriological understanding of the fourth- century theologian Hilary of Poitiers as manifested in his underappreciated Tractatus super Psalmos . Hilary offers an understanding of salvation in which Christ saves humanity by assuming every single person into his body in the incarnation. My dissertation contributes to scholarship on Hilary in two ways. First, I demonstrate that Hilary’s teaching concerning Christ’s assumption of all humanity is a unique development of Latin sources. Because of his understanding of Christ’s assumption of all humanity, Hilary, along with several Greek fathers, has been accused of heterodoxy resulting from Greek Platonic influence. I demonstrate that Hilary is not influenced by Platonism; rather, though his redemption model is unique among the early Latin fathers, he derives his theology from a combination of Latin-influenced biblical exegesis and classical Roman themes.
  • Sulpicius Severus and Martin of Tours: Defending a Mentor, Securing a Saint Matthew Yar N Reed Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

    Sulpicius Severus and Martin of Tours: Defending a Mentor, Securing a Saint Matthew Yar N Reed Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2009 Sulpicius Severus and Martin of Tours: defending a mentor, securing a saint Matthew yaR n Reed Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Reed, Matthew Ryan, "Sulpicius Severus and Martin of Tours: defending a mentor, securing a saint" (2009). LSU Master's Theses. 3232. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/3232 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SULPICIUS SEVERUS AND MARTIN OF TOURS: DEFENDING A MENTOR, SECURING A SAINT A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Matthew R. Reed B.A., University of Louisiana at Lafayette, 2006 May, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... iii CHAPTER 1. NOW FOR THE DEFENSE: SULPICIUS SEVERUS ......................................................1 2. A SOLDIER AND SIMPLETON ......................................................................................16
  • The Importance of Athanasius and the Views of His Character

    The Importance of Athanasius and the Views of His Character

    The Importance of Athanasius and the Views of His Character J. Steven Davis Submitted to Dr. Jerry Sutton School of Divinity Liberty University September 19, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I: Research Proposal Abstract .............................................................................................................................11 Background ......................................................................................................................11 Limitations ........................................................................................................................18 Method of Research .........................................................................................................19 Thesis Statement ..............................................................................................................21 Outline ...............................................................................................................................21 Bibliography .....................................................................................................................27 Chapter II: Background of Athanasius An Influential Figure .......................................................................................................33 Early Life ..........................................................................................................................33 Arian Conflict ...................................................................................................................36